Volume I - Annexes 1-60
Annex 1
Annex 1
1958] COMMERCIAL TREATIES 805
MODERN TREATIES OF FRIENDSHIP, COMMERCE
AND NAVIGATION
HERMAN w ALKER, JR.*
The bilateral "treaty of friendship, commerce and navigation" is
one of the most familiar instruments lmown to diplomatie tradition.
The title, commonly used to describe a basic accord fixing the
ground-rules goveming day-to-day intercourse between two countries,
designates the medium par ezcellence through which nations
have sought in a general settlement to secure reciprocal respect for
Volume III - Annexes 46-72
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
CASE CONCERNING CERTAIN IRANIAN ASSETS
(ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)
ATTACHMENTS AND ANNEXES TO THE MEMORIAL OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
VOLUME IV
01 February 2017
IN THE NAME OF GOD
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
CASE CONCERNING CERTAIN IRANIAN ASSETS
(ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)
ATTACHMENTS AND ANNEXES TO THE MEMORIAL OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
VOLUME IV
01 February 2017
Volume III - Annexes 46-72
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
CASE CONCERNING CERTAIN IRANIAN ASSETS
(ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)
ATTACHMENTS AND ANNEXES TO THE MEMORIAL OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
VOLUME III
01 February 2017
IN THE NAME OF GOD
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
CASE CONCERNING CERTAIN IRANIAN ASSETS
(ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)
ATTACHMENTS AND ANNEXES TO THE MEMORIAL OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
VOLUME III
01 February 2017
Volume II - Annexes 27-45
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
CASE CONCERNING CERTAIN IRANIAN ASSETS
(ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)
ATTACHMENTS AND ANNEXES TO THE MEMORIAL OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
VOLUME II
01 February 2017
IN THE NAME OF GOD
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
CASE CONCERNING CERTAIN IRANIAN ASSETS
(ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)
ATTACHMENTS AND ANNEXES TO THE MEMORIAL OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
VOLUME II
01 February 2017
Volume I - Annexes 1-26
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
CASE CONCERNING CERTAIN IRANIAN ASSETS
(ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)
ATTACHMENTS AND ANNEXES TO THE MEMORIAL OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
VOLUME I
01 February 2017
IN THE NAME OF GOD
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
CASE CONCERNING CERTAIN IRANIAN ASSETS
(ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)
ATTACHMENTS AND ANNEXES TO THE MEMORIAL OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
VOLUME I
01 February 2017
Declaration of Judge ad hoc Momtaz
Note: This translation has been prepared by the Registry for internal purposes and has no official
character
DECLARATION OF JUDGE AD HOC MOMTAZ
[Translation]
Security Council resolution 2231 (2015) — Binding effect of the obligations imposed by
resolution 2231 (2015) on United Nations Member States — Iran has complied with its
commitments under the JCPOA — Unlawfulness of the extraterritorial measures taken by the
United States in international law — Sanctions with extraterritorial effect do not fall within the
Separate opinion of Judge Cançado Trindade
SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE CANÇADO TRINDADE
Table of Contents
Paragraphs
I. Prolegomena. .............................................................................................................. 1-6
II. International Peace: Treaties as Living Instruments, in the Progressive Development of International Law. ............................................................................ 7-13
III. Provisional Measures: The Existence of the Court’s Prima Facie Jurisdiction. ....... 14-20
Dissenting opinion of Judge ad hoc Daudet
Note: This translation has been prepared by the Registry for internal purposes and has no official
character
DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE AD HOC DAUDET
[Translation]
Existence of an obligation to negotiate “Acta Protocolizada” of 1920 1950 exchange
of Notes Charaña process No contextualization by the Court of the obligation to negotiate
Effect of the accumulation of elements Legal rule and moral rules Excessive formalism
Obligation of means and obligation of result Need for continuation of the dialogue between the
Dissenting opinion of Judge Salam
DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SALAM
Vote against the operative part of the Judgment Disagreement with the reasoning of the Court concluding that no obligation to negotiate can be inferred from the documents presented by the Parties Agreement with the conclusion that the conditions for the application of the principles of estoppel, acquiescence and legitimate expectations are not satisfied Existence of an obligation of conduct and not an obligation of result.