Separate opinion, partly concurring and partly dissenting of Judge ad hoc Tuzmukhamedov

SEPARATE OPINION, PARTLY CONCURRING AND PARTLY DISSENTING, OF JUDGE AD HOC TUZMUKHAMEDOV
Lack of evidence of terrorism financing — Lack of proof of terrorist intent.
No violation of Article 9 of ICSFT in light of absence of terrorism financing — Threshold adopted by the Majority for Article 9 of ICSFT too low — The Respondent fulfilled its obligations under Article 9 of ICSFT.
The meaning of “funds” excludes weapons — Treaty interpretation — Judicial practice.
The “clean hands” doctrine — Conditions met to apply the doctrine for ICSFT and CERD.

Declaration of Judge Brant

DECLARATION OF JUDGE BRANT
[Translation]
1. I am in general agreement with the reasoning and conclusions of the Court as set out in the present Judgment. However, I cannot endorse the decision in subparagraph (5) of the operative clause, by which the Court finds that the Russian Federation, as a result of the measure banning the Mejlis, has violated the Order of 19 April 2017 indicating provisional measures. I therefore wish to set out briefly the reasons why I disagree with the majority of the Court on this aspect of the Judgment.

Separate opinion of Judge Charlesworth

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE CHARLESWORTH
Concept of “funds” in the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism  Function of non-financial assets  Mental elements of the offence of terrorism financing.
Article 12 of the ICSFT  Unjustified delay as a failure to afford the greatest measure of assistance  Justification of a refusal to provide assistance.
Scope of Ukraine’s case under the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination  No requirement for a pattern of racial discrimination under CERD.

Declaration of Judge Abraham

DECLARATION OF JUDGE ABRAHAM
[Translation]
1. I voted in favour of all the subparagraphs of the operative part of the present Judgment, with the exception of subparagraph (6) whereby the Court finds that the Russian Federation has violated its obligation to comply with the provision of the Order indicating provisional measures of 19 April 2017 directing it to refrain from any action which might aggravate or extend the dispute, or make it more difficult to resolve.

Links