INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
Peace Palace, Carnegieplein 2, 2517 KJ The Hague, Netherlands
Tel.: +31 (0)70 302 2323 Fax: +31 (0)70 364 9928
Website: www.icj-cij.org
Press Release
Unofficial
No. 2009/13
19 February 2009
Belgium institutes proceedings against Senegal and requests the Court
to indicate provisional measures
THE HAGUE, 19 February 2009. Belgium instituted proceedings late this after noon before
the International Court of Justice (ICJ) against Senegal, on the grounds that a dispute exists
“between the Kingdom of Belgium and the Republic of Senegal regardi ng Senegal’s compliance
with its obligation to prosecute” the former Preside nt of Chad, Hissène Habré, “or to extradite him
to Belgium for the purposes of cr iminal proceedings”. It has also submitted a request for the
indication of provisional measures in order toprotect its rights pending the Court’s Judgment on
the merits.
Application instituting proceedings
In its Application, Belgium maintains that Senegal, where Mr. Habré has been living in exile
since 1990, has taken no action on its repeated re quests to see the form er Chadian President
prosecuted in Senegal, failing his extradition to Belgium, for acts including crimes of torture and
crimes against humanity. The Applicant recalls that, following a complaint filed on
25January2000 by seven individuals and an NG O (the Association of Victims of Crimes and
Political Repression), Mr.Habré was indicted on 3February 2000 in Dakar for complicity in
“crimes against humanity, acts of torture and barbarity” and placed under house arrest. Belgium
adds that this indictment was dismissed by the Chambre d’accusation of the Dakar Court of Appeal
on 4July2000, on the grounds that “‘crimes agai nst humanity’ d[id] not form part of Senegalese
criminal law”.
The Applicant further indicates that “[b]etween 30 November 2000 and 11 December 2001,
a Belgian national of Chadian origin and Chadian nationals” filed similar complaints in the Belgian
courts. Belgium recalls that, si nce the end of 2001, its competent legal authorities have addressed
numerous writs for judicial investigations to Senegal, and in September 2005 issued an
international arrest warrant against Mr. Habré on which the Senegalese courts did not see fit to take
action. At the end of 2005, according to the App licant, Senegal passed the case on to the African
Union. Belgium adds that in February 2007, Sene gal decided to amend its penal code and code of
criminal procedure so as to include “the offe nces of genocide, war crimes and crimes against
humanity”; however, it points out that the Respondent has cited financial difficulties preventing it
from bringing Mr. Habré to trial.
Belgium contends that under conventional international law, “Senegal’s failure to prosecute
Mr.H.Habré, if he is not extradited to Belgium to answer for the acts of torture that are alleged
against him, violates the [United Nations] Conve ntion against Torture [of 10December1984], in
particular Article5, paragraph2, Article7, para graph1, Article8, paragraph2, and Article9, - 2 -
paragraph1”. It adds that, under international custom, “Senegal’s failure to prosecute
Mr. H. Habré, or to extradite him to Belgium to answer for the crimes against humanity which are
alleged against him, violates the general obligation to punish crimes against international
humanitarian law which is to be found in numer ous texts of derived law (institutional acts of
international organizations) and treaty law”.
To found the Court’s jurisdiction, Belgiu m first invokes the unilateral declarations
recognizing the compulsory jurisdiction of the Cour t made by the Parties pursuant to Article36,
paragraph2, of the Statute of the Court on 17June 1958 (Belgium) and 2December 1985
(Senegal).
Moreover, the Applicant indicates that “both States have been parties to the United Nations
Convention against Torture of 10 December 1984” since 21 Augus1 t 986 (Senegal) and
25June1999 (Belgium). Article30 of the Convention provides that any dispute between two
States parties concerning its interpretation or application which it has not been possible to settle
through negotiation or arbitrati on may be submitted to the ICJ by one of the States. Belgium
contends that negotiations between the two States “have continued unsuccessfully since 2005” and
that it reached the conclusion that they had failed on 20 June 2006. Belgium states, moreover, that
it suggested recourse to arbitration to Senegal on 20June2006 and notes that the latter “failed to
respond to that request... whereas Belgium has persistently confirmed in Notes Verbales that a
dispute on this subject continues to exist”.
At the end of its Application, Belgium requests the Court to adjudge and declare that
“⎯ the Court has jurisdiction to entertain th e dispute [between Belgium and Senegal]
regarding Senegal’s compliance with its obligation to prosecute Mr.H.Habré or
to extradite him to Belgium for the purposes of criminal proceedings;
⎯ Belgium’s Application is admissible;
⎯ the Republic of Senegal is obliged to bring criminal proceedings against
Mr.H.Habré for acts including crimes of torture and crimes against humanity
which are alleged against him as author, co-author or accomplice;
⎯ failing the prosecution of Mr.H.Habré, the Republic of Senegal is obliged to
extradite him to the Kingdom of Belgium so that he can answer for his crimes
before the Belgian courts”.
Provisional measures
Belgium also submitted today a request for the indication of provisional measures. It
explains therein that while “Mr. H. Habré is [currently] under house arrest in Dakar . . . it transpires
from an interview which the President of Senegal, A.Wade, gave to Radio France International
that Senegal could lift his house arrest if it fails to find the budget which it regards as necessary for
the organization of the trial of Mr. H. Habré”. Th e Applicant emphasizes that “[i]n such an event,
it would be easy for Mr.H.Habré to leave Se negal and avoid any pr osecution”, which “would
cause irreparable prejudice to the rights confe rred on Belgium by international law [and] would
violate the obligations which Senegal must fulfil”.
Consequently, Belgium requests the Court “to indicate, pending a final judgment on the
merits”, provisional measures requiring the Respondent to take “all the steps within its power to
keep Mr. H. Habré under the control and surveillance of the judicial authorities of Senegal so that
the rules of international law with which Belgium requests compliance may be correctly applied”.
___________ - 3 -
The full text of Belgium’s Application will be available shortly on the Court’s website
___________
Information Department:
Messrs. Boris Heim and Maxime Schouppe, Information Officers (+31 (0)70 302 2337)
Ms Joanne Moore, Associate Information Officer (+31 (0)70 302 2394)
Mrs. Barbara Dalsbaek, Administrative Assistant (+31 (0)70 302 2396)
Belgium institutes proceedings against Senegal and requests the Court to indicate provisional measures