17 June20l3
DearSfr~
Wilhtef~t~ tthe:case.çop;cgrhalimc.iii ilie.Antarctic.
(Australia"v. NewZeaia:nd intervehavetnedïonou· ·
aèJqic;Jwl~dg~·r.eèë .1:fO9·ddf1di\flet,tirqer9
cov~ofwlïichyotra:ns.m.copy·oftl~t temthe'·Ageni·.of
Awtralia.eott:nnühisGov.enin ibsrt~,dnn·çoilnëction
"v.lry.·:....... .. .. ... · ···· ···
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
WHALING IN THE ANTARCTIC
(AUSTRAL/A v.JAPAN)
STATEMENT BY DR NICK GALES BVMS PhD
Chief Scientist, Australian Antarctic Program
15 APRIL 2013
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. fu this statement I draw on my direct experience as: an active member of the
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
TERRITORIAL AND MARITIME DISPUTE
(NICARAGUA v. COLOMBIA)
REPLY OF THE
GOVERNMENT OF NICARAGUA
VOLUME I
18 SEPTEMBER 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................1
I. ROCEDURAL H ISTORY ........................................................................................ 1
REQUEST FOR THE INDICATION OF NEW PROVISIONAL MEASURES
A. INTRODUCTION
1. I have the honour to refer to the Application submitted to the Court on
18November 2010 by which proceedings were instituted on behalf of the Republic of Costa
Rica (Costa Rica) against the Republic of Nicaragua (Nicaragua) in Certain Activities Carried
Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua) and to the Court's Order on
1
provisional measures of 8 March 2011.
Appendix 2: M Mange!, An Assessment of Japanese Whale Research Programs
Under Special PermitAntarctic (JARPA, JARPA II) as Programsfor
of Whales, April 2011cResearch in the Context of Conservation and Management
An Assessment of Japanese Whale
Research Programs Under Special
Permit in the Antarctic (JARPA,
JARPA II) as Programs for
Purposes of Scientific Research in the
Context of Conservation and
Management of Whales
MarcMangeLPhD,FAAASF , RSE
MaiJr.JM)ebouœnt .m~aeetmUilëbysP~rJttdith E..Zeb,
a f'OI"erkair of·theJWC SâeutifieCunllittee
(PmvidedU1:t~P fP:~Oil i,~tQ ~ bythe(JQV~QfJt'iplfl)
Zeh-1tornmeŒs.oAnppendix2 ofAdated 3DeŒmbe 2012
Zeh--2:Commentsn15Apri110l3 MangetSnpplernentandOa:lesStdate19t.
May2:01~
• Clç:aCQ~ ~work fQr JARPAït ~11-ddi ole,lje tcstiJ~,
h~ .·~why th~~h isileede~ cleaï~ribëd iril.pla·n
eônsideŒbdëmit {p.9o:fZeh·l; leh~Z)
International Court of Justice
________________________
Judgment No. 2867 of the
Administrative Tribunal of the
International Labour Organization upon
a Complaint against the International
Fund for Agricultural Development
(Request for an Advisory Opinion)
Written Statement of the International
Fund for Agricultural Development
29 October 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS
EMBAJADD AECOLOMBIA
LaHaya-LosPaisesBajos
Ubertodrden
The Hague, 26 May 2010
Dear Sir,
I refer to your letter dated 25 February 2010 informing that the Court has fixed
26 May 2010 as the time-limit for the filing ofwritten observations by the Parties in
the case concerning Territorial and Maritime Dispute (Nicaragua v. Colombia) with
regard to Costa Rica's Application for permission to intervene.
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
REQUEST FOR INTERPRETATION OFTHE JUDGMENT OF 15 JUNE
1962 IN THE CASE CONCERNING THE TEMPLE OF PREAH VIHEAR
(CAMBODIAv.THAILAND)
(CAMBODIAv. THAILAND)
WRITTEN OBSERVATIONS
OF THE KINGDOM OF THAILAND
21 NOVEMBER 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION .................... 1
A. Procedural Matters ............................... 1
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
MARITIME DISPUTE
(PERU vCHILE)
MEMORIAL OF THE
GOVERNMENT OF PERU
VOLUME 1
20 MARCH 2009 "States should bem:in mind:
(a) That legal disputes should as a
generalmle be refelTed by the parties
to the International Court of Justice , in
accordance with the provisions of the
Stahlte of the Court.
Recourse to judicial settlement of
legal disputes , palticularl y refen·al to
the Intemational Court of Justice ,