written_pleading

Title
Written proceedings

Reply of the Republic of India

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
JADHAV CASE
(India v. Pakistan)
REPLY
OF
THE REPUBLIC OF INDIA
17 APRIL 2018
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
JADHAV CASE
(India v. Pakistan)
REPLY
OF
THE REPUBLIC OF INDIA
17 APRIL 2018
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................ 1
II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND...................................................................................... 9

Counter-Memorial of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
THE JADHA V CASE
THE REPUBLIC OF INDIA v. THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF
PAKISTAN
COUNTER-MEMORIAL OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF
PAKISTAN
13TH DECEMBER 2017
Page 1 of 147
Contents
I. INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................. 5
II. F ACTUAL BACKGROUND .............................................................................................. 10

Memorial of the Republic of India

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
JADHAV CASE
(India v. Pakistan)
MEMORIAL
OF
THE REPUBLIC OF INDIA
13 SEPTEMBER 2017
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
JADHAV CASE
(India v. Pakistan)
MEMORIAL
OF
THE REPUBLIC OF INDIA
13 SEPTEMBER 2017
Table of Contents
I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 1
II. JURISDICTION .................................................................................................. 6

Written observations of Japan on the Declaration of Intervention by New Zealand

Written Observations of J a pan on the Declaration of Intervention of New ZeàÏaiid
1. J~pâii takès .notè ofthë decisicîn biNêw-Z.ëaj.âlid tô ë:i:èr9ise its rlght of iritervéntj~ri
:fu the case conceming Vlhalini:!· in the.Antarctic· fAustralia: v. Jaoan) pürstiant to Artide ....... ··•··-··' ··- - . ---·.
63: ofth~ Stafute oftbé Cow°(as ,;v~ll a$'.Ar.tides ·82:t<;> 85. qfthe: Rwes .~f Coμrt ,..,.:_ith the
·conseq_uënce tlïaMhe ëOD.stiilction'gtV~_n; p~/ ih~Ju~ffiJreQt: "-'ill, bê' ~ua~y "QindJng ûpdrj

Written observations of Australia on the Declaration of Intervention by New Zealand

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF füSTICE
WHALING IN THE ANTARCTIC
(A USTRALIA v. JAPAN)
WRJTTEN OBSERVATIONS OF AUSTRALIA ON
THE DECLARATION OF INTERVENTION BY THE
GOVERNMENTOFNEWZEALAND
18 DECEMBER2012
On 20 November 2012, New Zealand, invoking Article 63 of the Statute of the Comt
("the Statute"), filed a Declaration of h1tervention ("the New Zealand Declaration")1 in this
case. By letter of the same date, the Registrar of the Court, acting in accordance with

Observations and submissions of the Islamic Republic of Iran on the preliminary objections of the United States of America

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
CASE CONCERNING
CERTAIN IRANIAN ASSETS
(ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)
OBSERVATIONS AND SUBMISSIONS
ON THE U.S. PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS
SUBMITTED BY THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
01 SEPTEMBER 2017
IN THE NAME OF GOD
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
CASE CONCERNING
CERTAIN IRANIAN ASSETS
(ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)
OBSERVATIONS AND SUBMISSIONS
ON THE U.S. PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS
SUBMITTED BY THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN

Preliminary objections submitted by the United States of America

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
CERTAIN IRANIAN ASSETS
(ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)
PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS
SUBMITTED BY
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
MAY 1, 2017
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1: Introduction and Overview ........................................................................ 1
Section A: Iran’s Case ..................................................................................................... 2

Written Comments of the Republic of Seychelles

1. The Gnn:rnment or the Republic or Seychelles submitted 011 28 Februar) 2018 a
writlc11 statcmcnt to the International Court or .Justioe in relation to the l IN
Gencral Assembly's rcquest for an Advisory Opinion or the Court on the Legat
Co11scq11c11ces of lhe 5,'epora/ion ol thc Clwgo.,· ArchiJJc/ogo .fi'o111 Mauritius in
/965.
rhe questions put Lo the Court ure as roi lm, s:
a) ··Wus the prooess or decolonization or Mauritius lawrully completed whcn

Links