written_pleading
Letter dated 19 June 1995 from the Minister for Foreign Affairs of San Marino
Lett ered 1June199hm-the Ivhkkr forForeAnSiirs
ofSanMarino REWBBUCA DISAN MARINO
SEGRmRU DiSTATOPEUGU AFFARI EmRl San Marino, 19th June 1995
With reference to your letter n. 95586 dated 8th February 1995, please take
note of the following:
The Republic of San Marino affirms that-the existence of nuclear weapons and,
Application for Permission to Intervene under Article 62 of the Statute - Declaration of Intervention under Article 63 of the Statute submitted by the Government of the Samoa Islands
- Annex 1to GEN95/81
INTERNATIONAL COURTOFJUSTICE
Dcssiar.
Cr~du~-Brin,,,,
NUCLEARTESTS
(NEWZEALAND v. FRANCE)
APPLICATIONFORPERMISSIONTO INTERVENEUNDERARTICLE62
DECLARATIONOF INTERVENTIONUNDERARTICLE63
SUBMllTED BY
THE GOVERNMENTOF SAMOA
Letter dated 13 June 1995 from the Ambassador of Finland, together with Written Statement of the Government of Finland
Lettdart13June1995.m the.Ambassaof-F&4 togethawith
Wn#en bkmnî oftheGovernmeotfFinland EMBASSY OF FIN LAN D
Groot ~e~oqinnelaan 16
2517 SG TIiE XAGm The iiaçue, 13 June 14?5
No. I iL5
Dezr Sir,
Referring to your lorter of 8 February 1995 please fine
enclosed the ansïer of the Ministry for Foreign Affairs
of Finlanc.
Application for Permission to Intervene under Article 62 of the Statute - Declaration of Intervention under Article 63 of the Statute submitted by the Government of the Federated States of Micronesia
INTERNATIONALCOURTOFJUSTICE
NUCLEARTESTS
(NEWZEALAND v.FRANCE)
APPLICATIONFORPERMISSIONTO INTERVENEUNDERARTICLE62
DECLARATIONOF INTERVENTIONUNDERARTICLE 63
SUBMlTiED BY
THE GOVERNMENTOFTHE FEDERATEDSTATES OFMlCRONESlA
24 AUGUST1995 NUCLEARTESTS CASE (NEW ZEALAND v. FRANCE)
APPLICATIONTO BE PERMITTED TO INTERVENEUNDER
ARTICLE 62
Written Comments of the Government of the United States of America
COUR INTERNATIONALE DE JUSTICE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
COMMENTS OF THE UNITED STATES
Pursuant to the Court's Order of August 10, 1998, the United States offers the following
comments on the written statements submitted to the Court concerning the request for an
advisory opinion on the question of the Difference Relating to Immunity from Legal Process
of a Special Rapporteur of the Commission on Human Rights.
Pagination
- Previous page
- Page 101
- Next page