Questions of jurisdiction and/or admissibility

INTERNATIONCOURTOFJUSTICE

CASECONCERNINGAVENAANDOTHERMEXICANNATIONALS
(MEXICOv. UNITEDSTATESOFAMERICA)

COUNTER-MEMORIAL OF
THEUNITEDSTATESOFAMERICA

VOLUME 1
TEXTOFTHECOUNTER-MEMORIAL

3 NOVEMBER2003 Tableof Contents

1. INTRODUCTION.. ...................... 1

II. STATEMENTOFFACTS. ................ 1 1

MÉMOIREDU HONDURAS
(COMPÉTENCEETRECEVABILITÉ)

MEMORIALOFHONDURAS
(JURISDICTIONAND ADMISSIBILITY) Volume 1

INTRODUCTION

MEMORIAL ON JURISDICTION
SUBMITTED BY THE GOVERNMENT OP

THEUNITED KINGDOMOFGREATBRITAZN
AND NORTHERN IRELAND PART A

INTRODUCTION

1. This Memorial is subrnitted to the Court in Dursuanceof the Order made
by the Court on 18 August 1972, which Order iequired the Governrnent of

COUNTER-MEMORIALOFNICARAGUA
(JURISDICTIOAND ADMISSIBILITY) Volume 1

INTRODUCTION

MEMORIALOP THE GOVERNMENT OFTHE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

MÉMOIRE DU GOUVERNEMENT
DES ÉTATS-UNID'AMÉRIQUE PART 1

INTRODUCTION

INTERNATICOURTOF JUSTICE

PLEADINGS, ORAL ARGUMENTS, DOCUMENTS

CASE CONCERNING MILITARY AND

PARAMILITARYACTIVITIES IN AND
AGAINST NICARAGUA

(NICARAGUAvUNITED STATESOF AMERICA)

VOLUMEIl

COUR lNTERNATIDJUSTICE

MEMOIRES,PLAIDOIETDOCUMENTS

AFFAIREDES ACTIVITÉSMILITAIRES
ET PARAMILITAIRESAU NICARAGUA

ET CONTRE CELUI-CI
(NICARAGUA c. ÉTATS-UNISD'AMERIQUE)

VOLUMEII Abbreviatedreference:

MEMORIAL OF NICARAGUA
(QUESTIONS OF JURISDICTION
AND ADMISSIBILITY)

MÉMOIRE DU NICARAGUA
(QUESTIONS DE LA COMPÉTENCE
ETDE LA RECEVABILITÉ)362 MILITARY ANI) PARAMILITARY ACTIVITIES 13-51

of 14August 1946by a letter dated 6 Apnl 1984from Secretary of State George
Shultz to the Secn:tary-General of the United Nations was ineffective to ac-
complish either result (Part One, II, pp. 389-402,infra).
C. In addition, under Nicaragua's reserved right to amend its Application

MEMORIALONJURISDICTIOAND

ADMISSIBILISUBMITTEBYTHE
GOVERNMENT OFAUSTRALIA INTRODUCTION

1. This Meiiiorial is subiiiitted to the Court in pursuance of the Order made

by the Court on 22 June 1973, as amended in respect of finie-limits by its
0rder of 28 August 1973.
2. In the Order of 22 June 1973, the Court directed that "the written pro-

MEMORIALON JURISDICTZON
SUBMITTEDBY THE GOVERNMENT
OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC
OF GERMANY INTRODUCTION

1. This Memorial is siibniittcd in pursuancc of the Order of thc Coitrt datcd
18 August 1972 in the Fisheries Jiirisdictioii Case (Fi~I~~rrR tlep~iblica/ Ger-
many v. Icelaii<l). By this Ordcr the Court decided that the first plcadings in.