Preliminary objections

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
Peace Palace, Carnegieplein 2, 2517 KJ The Hague, Netherlands
Tel.: +31 (0)70 302 2323 Fax: +31 (0)70 364 9928
Website X YouTube LinkedIn
Press Release
Unofficial
No. 2025/4
22 January 2025
Aerial Incident of 8 January 2020 (Canada, Sweden, Ukraine and United Kingdom v. Islamic Republic of Iran) Preliminary objections raised by Iran Fixing of the time-limit for the filing by the Applicants of a written statement of their observations and submissions

17 JANUARY 2025
ORDER
AERIAL INCIDENT OF 8 JANUARY 2020 (CANADA, SWEDEN, UKRAINE AND UNITED KINGDOM v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN)
___________
INCIDENT AÉRIEN DU 8 JANVIER 2020 (CANADA, ROYAUME-UNI, SUÈDE ET UKRAINE C. RÉPUBLIQUE ISLAMIQUE D’IRAN)
17 JANVIER 2025
ORDONNANCE
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
YEAR 2025
2025
17 January
General List
No. 190
17 January 2025
AERIAL INCIDENT OF 8 JANUARY 2020
(CANADA, SWEDEN, UKRAINE AND UNITED KINGDOM v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN)
ORDER

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
Peace Palace, Carnegieplein 2, 2517 KJ The Hague, Netherlands
Tel.: +31 (0)70 302 2323 Fax: +31 (0)70 364 9928
Website X YouTube LinkedIn
Press Release
Unofficial
No. 2024/74
12 November 2024
Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Azerbaijan v. Armenia) The Court finds that it has jurisdiction on the basis of Article 22 of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination to entertain the Application filed by Azerbaijan

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
Peace Palace, Carnegieplein 2, 2517 KJ The Hague, Netherlands
Tel.: +31 (0)70 302 2323 Fax: +31 (0)70 364 9928
Website X YouTube LinkedIn
Summary
Unofficial
Summary 2024/10
12 November 2024
Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Azerbaijan v. Armenia) Summary of the Judgment of 12 November 2024
I. INTRODUCTION (PARAS. 22-28)

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
Peace Palace, Carnegieplein 2, 2517 KJ The Hague, Netherlands
Tel.: +31 (0)70 302 2323 Fax: +31 (0)70 364 9928
Website X YouTube LinkedIn
Press Release
Unofficial
No. 2024/73
12 November 2024
Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Armenia v. Azerbaijan) The Court finds that it has jurisdiction on the basis of Article 22 of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination to entertain the Application filed by Armenia

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
Peace Palace, Carnegieplein 2, 2517 KJ The Hague, Netherlands
Tel.: +31 (0)70 302 2323 Fax: +31 (0)70 364 9928
Website X YouTube LinkedIn
Summary
Unofficial
Summary 2024/9
12 November 2024
Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Armenia v. Azerbaijan) Summary of the Judgment of 12 November 2024
I. INTRODUCTION (PARAS. 31-37)

DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE TLADI
Jurisdiction ratione temporis — Interpretation of Article 22 of the Convention — Applicability of other relevant rules and principles of international law under Article 31 (1) (c) of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties —Reciprocity — Non-retroactivity  Concept of erga omnes partes not undermined by Judgment.

DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE CLEVELAND
Jurisdiction ratione temporis — Admissibility — Standing — Obligations erga omnes partes — Non-retroactivity — Reciprocity — State responsibility — Inter-State complaint process.
Armenia’s objection raises question of admissibility and standing — Court has jurisdiction to hear the claims — CERD compromissory clause contains no limitation ratione temporis — No issue of retroactivity was presented.

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE CHARLESWORTH
Jurisdiction ratione temporis  Distinction between jurisdiction and admissibility  Qualification of the first preliminary objection as one of legal standing.
The applicability of CERD to pre-existing disputes  The need for explicit limitations in order to rule out pre-existing disputes from a treaty’s temporal scope  The general rule on pre-existing disputes otherwise being covered by a treaty’s temporal scope.

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE IWASAWA