Provisional measures

Code
1

Request for the indication of provisional measures submitted by the Republic of India

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

Case Concerning the Vienna Conventionon Consula1r

Relations
(India vs. Pakistan)

REQUEST FOR THE INDICATION OF

PROVISIONAL MEASURES OF
PROTECTION

The Hague , 8 May 2017 REQUEST FOR THE INDICATION OF
PROVISIONAL MEASURES OF PROTECTION

SUBMITTED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF
THE REPUBLIC OF INDIA

1. 1 have the honor to refer to the Application

Request for the indication of provisional measures of protection submitted by Ukraine

REQUEST FOR THE INDICATION OF
PROVISIONAL MEASURES OF PROTECTION
SUBMITTED BY UKRAINE

1. I have the honor to refer to the Application filed with the Court on 13
January 2017, instituting proceedings on behalf of Ukraine against the Russian Federation,
and to submit, in accordance with Article 41 of the Statute of the Court and Articles 73,

Order of 7 December 2016

7 DÉCEMBRE 2016

ORDONNANCE

IMMUNITÉS ET PROCÉDURES PÉNALES

(GUINÉE ÉQUATORIALE c. FRANCE)

DEMANDE EN INDICATION DE MESURES CONSERVATOIRES

___________

IMMUNITIES AND CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS

(EQUATORIAL GUINEA v. FRANCE)

REQUEST FOR THE INDICATION OF PROVISIONAL MEASURES

7 DECEMBER 2016

Request for the indication of provisional measures submitted by Equatorial Guinea

R EQUEST FOR THE INDICATION OF PROVISIONAL MEASURES SUBMITTED
BY THE G OVERNMENT OF E QUATORIAL G UINEA

[Translation]

I. Introduction

1. I have the honour to refer to the Application submitted to the Court on 13 June 2016
instituting proceedings in the name of the Republic of Equatorial Guinea (hereinafter “Equatorial

Replies of Senegal to questions put during the hearings (translation)

[Translation]

Reply by Senegal to the questions put on 12 February 1990
by Judge Oda

First Question

Under what internal law or acts of Senegal did the Senegalese Navy

board the fishing vessel Hoyo Maru No. 8 and take it to the port of

Dakar on 9 October 1989, and was the Captain of the vessel subjected to

judicial proceedings as a result of which he was ord.ered to pay a fine of

Answers by the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya to the questions put by Members of the Court

Annex to LUK92/18

Replies by Libya to the questions put by Judge SChwebel

Libya understands that the thrust of the three questions put by
Judge Schwebel is to obtain the views of the Parties on the question
whether the Montreal Convention (various Articles thereof, particularly
10 and 12) applies when the "persan" who has committed the offence and is

Links