DISSENTING OPINION OF VICE-PRESIDENT GEVORGIAN
The Court lacks prima facie jurisdiction to indicate provisional measures — Conditions under Article 30 (1) of the Convention Against Torture are not met — No genuine attempt to resolve the dispute through negotiations.

1
Before the
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
DECLARATION OF INTERVENTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF MALDIVES
Intervention pursuant to Article 63 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice
In the case of
APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND
PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE
(THE GAMBIA v. MYANMAR)
10 November 2023
2
To the Registrar, International Court of Justice (the “Court”), the undersigned being duly
authorised by the Government of the Republic of Maldives:

ANNEXA
COUR INTERNATIONAL COURT
OF JUSTICE
153168 24 January 2020
I have the honour to refer to my letter (
No. 152867) dated 11 November 2019 informing
your Government that the Republic of The Gambia filed in the Registry of the Court an Application
instituting proceedings against the Republic of the Union of Myanmar in the case concerning
Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide
(The Gambia v. Myanmar). A copy of the Application was appended to that letter. The text of the

JOINT DECLARATION OF INTERVENTION OF
CANADA, THE KINGDOM OF DENMARK, THE FRENCH REPUBLIC, THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF
GERMANY, THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS, AND THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN
AND NORTHERN IRELAND
Pursuant to Article 63 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice
In the case of
APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF
GENOCIDE
(THE GAMBIA v. MYANMAR)
To the Registrar of the International Court of Justice (“the Court”), the undersigned being duly