SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE KOROMA

DECLARATION OF JUDGE RANJEVA

DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ODA

Lack ofjurisdiction of'the Court - Absence of'u legal dispute 117ithithepur-
view of Article 36, paragraph 2, qf'the Sratutr - Mere hclief of the Congo that
the Belgiun LUIVviolated irîternationul IUIInot c,videnceor pro(?f'thcita dispute
e.ui.stedhetkiwn it and Belgiunî Failure of'the Application irîstituting pro-
ceedings to specifiv the legul gro~1nd.sporlit3hicl1thejurisdictiorîof the Court is

SEPARATE OPINION OF PRESIDENT GUILLAUME

[English Original 7;cictl

Criminul jurisdiction of' rzutionul courts-- Plue? qf' cornrnission uf'rlle
qfjbnce - Otlirr criteritr of'connect-on Universalji~ri.s -diAh.reoceoj.'

70

DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE AD HOC BERMAN

DUI ies and funet ions of a judge ad hoc.

FirSI preliminary objection: lack of dispute - Germany precluded, by ordi­
nary considerations of good faith, from now arguing "no dispute".

69

DECLARATION OF JUDGE AD HOC FLEISCHHAUER

47

DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE OWADA

40

DTSSENTING OPTNTON OF JUDGE ELARABY

29

DISSENTlNG OPINION OF JUDGE KOOIJMANS

471

DISSENTING OpINION OF JUDGE DONOGHUE

Disagreement with outcome and approach of the Court in rejecting Honduras’s
Application to intervene — Maritime claims overlapping area at issue sufficient to
show an interest of a legal nature that may be affected — Court’s practice of using
a directional arrow demonstrates its appreciation that its decisions “▯may affect”