DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE TARASSOV
1have unfortunately been obliged to vote against the Order by which
the Court has decided that the Application by Nicaragua for permission
to intervene under Article 62 of the Statute in the case concerning the
Land, Island and Maritime FrontierDispute (El Salvador/Hondurasj
shouldbe dealt with by the Chamber formed to deal with the case.
DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ELIAS
DECLARATION OF JUDGE ODA
While 1am in full agreement withthe Court in itsviewthat :
"it is forthe Chamber formed to deal withthe present case to decide
whether the application forpermission to interveneunder Article 62
of the Statute filed by the Republic of Nicaragua on 17November
1989should be granted",
SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE SHAHABUDDEEN
SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE SCHWEBEL
DECLARATlON OF JUDGE ODA
DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SCHWEBEL
1 have voted in favour of the Court's rejection of the United States
request to dismiss Nicaragua's case onjurisdictional grounds. 1have sup-
ported the Court's indication of three provisional measures, namely :
SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGES MOSLER AND JENNINGS
We have voted in favour of this Order indicating interim measures of
protection, but in doing so we wish to emphasize two things :
DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE EL-KHAN1
[Translation ]
On 20 January 1982the Court adopted an Order settingup, for the first
time,aChamber in accordance withArticle 26,paragraph 2,of the Statute.
This Chamber willbe dealing with aparticular case concerning the course
of the singlemaritimeboundary in the Gulf of Maine between the areas of
continental shelfand fishingzonesappertaining to Canada and theUnited
States of America.
On 25 November 1981 the two Parties' diplomatic representatives at
DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MOROZOV