other_document

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL LAW
OF THE UN/LATERAL DECLARATION OF

INDEPENDENCE BY THE PROVJSIONAL INSTITUTIONS
OF SELF-GOVERNMENT OF KOSOVO

(REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION)

ANSWERS GIVEN BY THE KINGDOM OF SPAIN
TO THE QUESTIONS POSED BY JUDGES KOROMA,
BENNOUNA AND CANÇADO TRINDADE

Annex to LUS 92/17

Replies by Libya to the questions put by Judge SChwebel

Libya understands that the thrust of the three questions put by
Judge Schwebel is to obtain the views of the Parties on the question
whether the Montreal Convention (various Articles thereof, particularly

EMBASSY OF NICARAGUA

THE HAGUE

5 April2007

Sir,

1have the honour to refer to your letter of 29 March 2007 sent in relation to the
case concerning Maritime Delimitation between Nicaragua and Honduras in the
Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v. Honduras), by which you inform me that the President has

ESTADO PLURINACIONAL DE BOLIVIA

Embajada LaHaya - Paises Bajos

BOLIVIA'S COMMENTS ON CHILE'S REPLY

TO JUDGE OWADA'S QUESTION

1. Bolivia hereby respectfully submits its comments to Chile's 13 May 2015 reply to Judge

Owada's question to the parties. Chile's reply merely repeats its argument that the 1904Treaty

EMBASSY OF NICARAGUA
THEHAGUE

NICARAGUA'S COMMENTS ON COLOMBIA'SRESPONSE TO JUDGE
BENNOUNA'S QUESTION

1. Colombia makes three points in its summary response to Judge Bennouna's question,
each of which is either incorrect or misleading.

2. First, Colombia asserts that in the present case there are no areas of continental shelf

lying more than 200M from the nearest land territory.

1. Question Asked By Judge Koroma on 1 November 1995.

Part 1 of Question: Was resolution WHA 46.40 validly adopted?

Response:

Yes. Under Article 96 (2) of the United Nations Charter, specialized agencies may
request advisory opinions if authorized to do so by the General Assembly. Such

authorization is contained inArticle X.2 of the Agreement between the United Nations and
WHO.

Resolution WHA 46.40 was adopted in accordance with Article 76 of the

Annex Al to GEN90/13

Letter dated 13 February 1990 from the Agent of
Guinea-Bissau to the Registrar

[Translation)

Brussels, 13 February 1990
No. 1.57/EGBB/1990

Sir,

[Translation]

Reply of the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya
to the question of President SCHWEBEL

1.Libya's case, such as it was argued during the hearing on Wednesday 22 October 1997, is that there
has been an abuse or misuse of power if the Security Council has determined that there exists a
threat to the peace as the basis for requiring Liba to surrender the accused to the United States
or to the United Kingdom.

02/05 '9i 16:55 ~~ +421 i 5162355 MZVSR OMSD +·H OSPINA 141002

COMMENTS OF SLOVAKIA ON HUNGARY'S ANSWER
TO THE QUESTION OF JUDGE RANJEVA, POSED ON 7 MARCH 1997

Slovakia wishes to make a few, brief comments on Hungary·s Answer to the
following Question of Judge Ranjeva:

,Can Hungary draw up a table calling to mind:

(1) the financial commitmentsannouncedby the Union of Soviet Socialist
Republies;

CASE CONCERNING OIL PLATFORMS

ŒSLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)

PRELIMINARY OBJECTION

RESPONSE OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN TO
VICE-PRESIDENT SCHWEBEL'S QUESTION

"ln these proceedings, both Parties cite documents from the ratification processes of

treaties offriendship, commerce and navigation to shed light on their intentions in concluding

the 1955 Treaty of Amity, Economie Relations and Consular Rights in the terms in which it