Questions of jurisdiction and/or admissibility

Code
26

Parties' responses to questions put by Judge Vereshchetin during oral proceedings

29 June 2000

QATAR'S RESPONSE TO THE QUESTION PUT BY JUDGE VERESHCHETIN TO

QATARANDBAHRAIN

On 15 June 2000, Judge Vereshchetinput the following question to the Parties:

"Before 1971, were there any international agreements concluded by the United

K.ingdom with Qatar and Bahrain respectively other than those establishing their
relationshipf protection?

Act to Comply with Paragraphs (3) and (4) of Operative Paragraph 41 of the Judgment of the Court Dated 1 July 1994 filed by Qatar

The M"uti.ster Legal Adviser

ln the case concerning Maritime Delimitation and Territorial Questions between

Omar and Bahrain

\Oatar \". Bahrain}. Jurisdiction and t\dmissibility

ACT

10comply with para~ra p)and 4} of o.perative paracraph 41 of tJud~me nft

the CourJ date<! 1 Ju1y 1994

Report of the State of Bahrain to the International Court of Justice on the Attempt by the Parties to Implement the Court's Judgment of 1 July 1994

,...(,...,n''
:ROMMOFA-LEB GA L213ô38 (WED I, 30'94 1J:Oô No •3.old.}.t.cr~ 3

STATEOFBAHRAIN

MINISTRYFSTATEFORLEGAAFFAlAS
MIN1STER'SffiCE

Ret: __ ~------ -------- r--'..J'

Daltl:0th Novernber. 1994 -------- ~_,~!

Written Replies to Questions put by Vice President of the Court: Bahrain and Qatar

Attachment to the letter of Dr. Najeeb Al-Nauinû to the Registrar dated 11 March
1994

Response to

Questions of Vice-President Schwebel to Counsel

Question 1

The Doha Minutes (in the U.N. translation) specify that "the good offices" of the King of

Saudi Arabia "in addressing the dispute between the two countries" shaU continue until
May 1991; "Once thal period has elapsed, the two parties may submit the case to the

Links