DISSENTING OPINION OF SIR LOUIS MBANEFO

DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE FORSTER
[Translation]

DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE PADILLA NERVO

DISSENTING OPINlON OF JUDGE JESSUP

DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE TANAKA

DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KORETSKY

DISSENTING OPINION OF VICE-PRESIDENT

WELLINGTON KOO

1 regret to be unable to concur in the Judgment of the Court which
"finds that the Applicants cannot be considered to have established any
substantive right or legalinterest appertaining to them in the subject-
matter of the present claims". Nor am 1 able to agree with the reasons
upon which it is based. Pursuant to Article 57 of the Statute 1propose
to state the grounds for my dissent.

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE VAN WYK

GENERAG LROUND SOR DISMISSINA GPPLICANTS S'UBMISSIONS

1agree that the claim should be disrnissed and 1agree with the reasons

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE MORELLI

[Translation]
1. 1wish to give the reasons why, in my view, the Court's 1962Judg-
ment on the preliminary objections was no bar to the rejection of the
claim on the merits on the ground of its not being based on substantive
rights pertaining to the Applicants.

can indeed be very considerable,-but this is a differentthing. It operates
on the political not the legal level: it does not make these resolutions
binding in law. If the "necessity" argument were valid therefore, it
would be applicable as much to trusteeships as it is said to be to man-
dates, because in neither case could the administering authority be
coerced by means of the ordinary procedures of the organization.
Theconclusion to be drawn is obvious.