390

DECLARATION OF JUDGE DONOGHUE

1. I have voted in favour of all operative paragraphs of the Judgment

and I agree in most respects with the Court’s reasoning. In this declhara -
tion, I offer observations about the parts of the Judgment that discuss thhe
actus reus of genocide, both with respect to Croatia’s claim and with
respect to Serbia’s counter-claim.

381

DECLARATION OF JUDGE XUE

1. Much to my regret, I have voted against the operative paragraph 1

202

DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE CANÇADO TRINDADE

table of contents

Paragraphs

I. RoleGomena 1-5

II. The Regrettable Delays ihn the Adjudication of theh
Present Case 6-18

194

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE SKOTNIKOV

Jurisdiction

1. According to paragraph 129 of the 2008 Judgment (Application of

178

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE KEITH

1. As my votes indicate, I agree with the conclusions the Court has
reached. My purpose in preparing this opinion is to give further reasonsh
in support of those the Court gives in rejecting Croatia’s claim and Ser-
bia’s counter-claim. The issue I address is the failure of each Party to

168

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE OWADA

1. I voted in favour of the Judgment as a whole, including subpara -
graphs (2) and (3) of the operative paragraph (para. 524), which con -

155

SEPARATE OPINION OF PRESIDENT TOMKA

Temporal scope of the Court’s jurisdictio— Issues left open by the Court’s

S EPARATE OPINION OF J UDGE AD HOC D UGARD

Table of Contents

Paragraphs

I. Separate opinion.....................................................................1-2.............................

II. Territorial integrity................................................................3................................

DECLARATION OF JUDGE AD HOC GUILLAUME
[Translation]
I. Case concerning Certain Activities carried out by Nicaragua in the Border Area  New submissions presented by Costa Rica at the close of the hearings seeking recognition of its sovereignty over the disputed territory  Submissions belated and hence inadmissible  Nicaragua’s compliance with the Order of 8 March 2011  Freedom of navigation on the San Juan River  Régime applicable to transboundary harm caused by river dredging.

D ECLARATION OF JUDGE G EVORGIAN

Paragraph 1 of the dispositif  The Court’s finding that Costa Rica has sovereignty over
the “disputed territory” is unnecessary  The limits of that territory are not clear  The
geography of the area is unstable  Possible source of future disagreement  Article II of the

Treaty of Limits of 1858  First, second and third Alexander Awards  “First channel met”.