INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
CERTAIN IRANIAN ASSETS
(ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)
COUNTER-MEMORIAL
SUBMITTED BY
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
October 14, 2019
ANNEXES
VOLUME VIII
Annexes 161 through 182
ANNEX 161
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
CERTAIN IRANIAN ASSETS
(ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)
COUNTER-MEMORIAL
SUBMITTED BY
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
October 14, 2019
ANNEXES
VOLUME VII
Annexes 141 through 160
ANNEX 141
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
CERTAIN IRANIAN ASSETS
(ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)
COUNTER-MEMORIAL
SUBMITTED BY
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
October 14, 2019
ANNEXES
VOLUME VI
Annexes 121 through 140
ANNEX 121
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
CERTAIN IRANIAN ASSETS
(ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)
COUNTER-MEMORIAL
SUBMITTED BY
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
October 14, 2019
ANNEXES
VOLUME V
Annexes 109 through 120
ANNEX 109
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
CERTAIN IRANIAN ASSETS
(ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)
COUNTER-MEMORIAL
SUBMITTED BY
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
October 14, 2019
ANNEXES
VOLUME IV
Annexes 80 through 108
ANNEX 80
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
CERTAIN IRANIAN ASSETS
(ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)
COUNTER-MEMORIAL
SUBMITTED BY
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
October 14, 2019
ANNEXES
VOLUME III
Annexes 56 through 79
ANNEX 56
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
CERTAIN IRANIAN ASSETS
(ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)
COUNTER-MEMORIAL
SUBMITTED BY
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
October 14, 2019
ANNEXES
VOLUME II
Annexes 33 through 55
ANNEX 33
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
CERTAIN IRANIAN ASSETS
(ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)
COUNTER-MEMORIAL
SUBMITTED BY
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
October 14, 2019
ANNEXES
VOLUME I
Annexes 1 through 32
ANNEX 1
DECLARATION OF JUDGE AD HOC KRESS Representation of Myanmar The Gambia’s standing Point of terminology The Gambia as a “non-injured State” or as an “injured State” Concept of préjudice juridique Similarity of the present case with the case concerning Questions relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite (Belgium v.
DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE XUE 1. Much to my regret, I am unable to concur with the decision of the Court that The Gambia has standing in the present case, which leads me to vote against paragraph 115 (4) and (5). Pursuant to Article 57 of the Statute, I will explain the reasons for my dissent. 2.