INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
Peace Palace, Carnegieplein 2, 2517 KJ The Hague, Netherlands
Tel.: +31 (0)70 302 2323 Fax: +31 (0)70 364 9928
Website X YouTube LinkedIn
Press Release
Unofficial
No. 2024/46
23 May 2024
Embassy of Mexico in Quito (Mexico v. Ecuador) Request for the indication of provisional measures The Court finds that the circumstances do not require the exercise of its power to indicate provisional measures

DECLARATION OF JUDGE AURESCU
The paramount importance of upholding and strongly defending the norms and principles of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations.

DECLARATION OF JUDGE CLEVELAND

DECLARATION OF JUDGE NOLTE
Prima facie jurisdiction as a precondition for the examination of “circumstances” under Article 41 of the Statute  Logical and substantive priority of certain conditions  Limits of flexibility and judicial economy.

DECLARATION OF JUDGE BHANDARI
Two kinds of application, to be treated differently — test for the indication of provisional measures under Article 41 of the Court’s Statute — binding assurances before the Court — the Court is required to examine only one element of the test, i.e. prima facie jurisdiction — unnecessary to examine other elements of the test.

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
Peace Palace, Carnegieplein 2, 2517 KJ The Hague, Netherlands
Tel.: +31 (0)70 302 2323 Fax: +31 (0)70 364 9928
Website X YouTube LinkedIn
Summary
Unofficial
Summary 2024/5
23 May 2024
Embassy of Mexico in Quito (Mexico v. Ecuador) Request for the indication of provisional measures