Jadhav (India v. Pakistan) - Conclusion of the public hearings on the request for the indication of provisional measures submitted by India - The Court to begin its deliberation

Document Number
19434
Document Type
Number (Press Release, Order, etc)
2017/20
Date of the Document
Document File
Document

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

Peace Palace, Carnegieplein 2, 2517 KJ The Hague, Netherlands
Tel.: +31 (0)70 302 2323 Fax: +31 (0)70 364 9928
Website: www.icj-cij.org Twitter Account: @CIJ_ICJ

Press Release
Unofficial

2017/20 No.

Jadhav Case (India v. Pakistan)

Conclusion of the public hearings on the request for the indication of provisional measures
submitted by India

The Court to begin its deliberation

THE HAGUE, 15May2017. The public hearings on the request for the indication of
provisional measures made by India in the Jadhav Case (India v. Pakistan) were concluded today.
The Court will now begin its deliberation.

A single round of oral observations on the request took place on Monday 15 May 2017 at the

Peace Palace in The Hague, the seat of the Court. During the hearings, the delegation of India was
led by Dr. Deepak Mittal, Joint Secretary, Ministry of External Affairs, as Agent. The delegation
of Pakistan was led by H.E.Mr.MoazzamAhmadKhan, Ambassador of the Islamic Republic of
Pakistan to the United Arab Emirates, and Dr. Mohammad Faisal, Director-General (South Asia &
SAARC), as Agents. The Court’s decision on the request for the indication of provisional

measures will be delivered at a public sitting, the date of which will be announced in due course.

Requests of the Parties

At the end of their oral observations, th e Agents of the Parties made the following
statements:

For India:

“On behalf of the Republic of India, I request that pending final judgement in this case, the
Court indicate:

(a) that the Government of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan take all measures necessary to ensure
that Mr. Kulbhushan Sudhir Jadhav is not executed;

(b) that the Government of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan report to the Court the action it has
taken in pursuance of sub-paragraph (a); and

(c) that the Government of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan ensure that no action is taken that
might prejudice the rights of the Republic of India or Mr.Kulbhushan Sudhir Jadhav with
respect to any decision the Court may render on the merits of the case.” - 2 -

For Pakistan:

The Agent of Pakistan asked the Court to reject India’s request for the indication of
provisional measures.

History of the proceedings

The history of the proceedings can be found in Press Releases Nos. 2017/16 and 2017/17,
available on the Court’s website (www.icj-c ij.org) under the heading “Press Room”/“Press
Releases”.

Multimedia

The video of these hearings is available on demand (VOD) on the Court’s website
(www.icj-cij.org/multimedia), as well as on UN Web TV. Selected high-resolution video footage

(cover shots) of the event are available for TV use on the Court’s website. Still photographs of
the hearings have been posted on the ICJ and UN Photo websites, as well as on the Court’s Twitter
feed (@CIJ_ICJ).

All the photographs and videos made available to the media by the ICJ are free of charge and
free of copyright for editorial, non-commercial use.

___________

Note: The Court’s press releases do not cons titute official documents. The complete
verbatim records of the hearings held on 15 May 2017 will be published s hortly on the website of
the Court (www.icj-cij.org).

___________

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations.
It was established by the United Nations Char ter in June1945 and began its activities in

April1946. The seat of the Court is at the Peace Palace in The Hague (Netherlands). Of the six
principal organs of the United Nations, it is the only one not located in New York. The Court has a
twofold role: first, to settle, in accordance with international law, legal disputes submitted to it by

States (its judgments have binding force and are w ithout appeal for the parties concerned); and,
second, to give advisory opinions on legal questi ons referred to it by duly authorized United
Nations organs and agencies of the system. The Court is composed of 15judges elected for a
nine-year term by the General Assembly and the Security Council of the United Nations.

Independent of the United Nations Secretariat, it is assisted by a Registry, its own international
secretariat, whose activities are both judicial and diplomatic, as well as administrative. The official
languages of the Court are French and English. Also known as the “World Court”, it is the only
court of a universal character with general jurisdiction.

The ICJ, a court open only to States for cont entious proceedings, and to certain organs and
institutions of the United Nations system for advisory proceedings, should not be confused with the

other  mostly criminal  judicial institutions based in The Hague and adjacent areas, such as the
International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yu goslavia (ICTY, an adhoc court created by the
Security Council), the International Criminal Court (ICC, the first permanent international criminal
court, established by treaty, which does not bel ong to the United Nations system), the Special

Tribunal for Lebanon (STL, an international judici al body with an independent legal personality,
established by the United Nations Security Council upon the request of the Lebanese Government - 3 -

and composed of Lebanese and in ternational judges), or the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA,
an independent institution which assists in the est ablishment of arbitral tribunals and facilitates

their work, in accordance with the Hague Convention of 1899).

___________

Information Department:

Mr. Andrey Poskakukhin, First Secretary of the Court, Head of Department (+31 (0)70 302 2336)
Mr. Boris Heim and Ms Joanne Moore, Information Officers (+31 (0)70 302 2337)

Mr. Avo Sevag Garabet, Associate Information Officer (+31 (0)70 302 2394)
Ms Genoveva Madurga, Administrative Assistant (+31 (0)70 302 2396)

Document file FR
Document
Document Long Title

Jadhav (India v. Pakistan) - Conclusion of the public hearings on the request for the indication of provisional measures submitted by India - The Court to begin its deliberation

Links