INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
Peace Palace, Carnegieplein 2, 2517 KJ The Hague, Netherlands
Tel.: +31 (0)70 302 2323 Fax: +31 (0)70 364 9928
Website: www.icj-cij.org
Press Release
Unofficial
No. 2008/1
16 January 2008
Peru institutes proceedings against Chile with regard to a dispute
concerning maritime delimitation between the two States
THE HAGUE, 16 January 2008. Today Peru instituted proceedings against Chile before the
International Court of Justice (ICJ), the principal judicial organ of the United Nations, concerning a
dispute in relation, on the one hand, to “the de limitation of the boundary between the maritime
zones of the two States in the Pacific Ocean, beginning at a point on the coast called Concordia,1. . .
the terminal point of the land boundary established pursuant to the Treaty... of 3June1929 ”,
and, on the other, to the recognition in favour of Peru of a “maritime zone lying within 200 nautical
miles of Peru’s coast, and thus appertaining to Pe ru, but which Chile considers to be part of the
high seas”.
In its Application Peru claims that “the maritime zones between Chile and Peru have never
been delimited by agreement or otherwise” and that accordingly, “the delimitation is to be
determined by the Court in accordance with customary international law”. Peru explains that “since
the 1980s, [it] has consistently endeavoured to negot iate the various issues in dispute, but... has
constantly met a refusal from Chile to enter into negotiations”. It asserts that as a result of a Note of
10September2004 from the Minister for Foreign Affa irs of Chile addressed to the Minister for
Foreign Affairs of Peru, further attemptsat negotiations were no longer possible.
Peru now “requests the Court to determine th e course of the boundary between the maritime
zones of the two States in accordan ce with international law . . . and to adjudge and declare that
Peru possesses exclusive sovereign rights in the maritime area situated within the limit of
200 nautical miles from its coast but outside Chile’s exclusive economic zone or continental shelf”.
As the basis for the Court’s jurisdiction, Pe ru invokes Article XXXI of the American Treaty
on Pacific Settlement (Pact of Bogotá) of 30April1948, to which both States are parties without
reservation. This Article provides that: “In confor mity with Article 36, paragraph 2, of the Statute
of the International Court of Justice, the High Cont racting Parties declare that they recognize, in
relation to any other American State, the jurisdiction of the Court as compulsory ipso facto, without
the necessity of any special agreem ent so long as the present Treaty is in force, in all disputes of a
judicial nature that arise among them concerning:
1
Treaty between Chile and Peru for the settlement of th e dispute regarding Tacna a nd Arica, signed at Lima on
3 June 1929. - 2 -
(a) The interpretation of a treaty;
(b) Any question of international law;
(c) The existence of any fact which, if established, would constitute the breach of an international
obligation;
(d) The nature or extent of the reparation to be made for the breach of an international obligation.”
___________
The full text of Peru’s Application instituti ng proceedings will shortly be available on the
Court’s website (www.icj-cij.org).
___________
Information Department:
Mrs. Laurence Blairon, Secretary of the Court, Head of Department (+31 (0)70 302 2336)
Messrs. Boris Heim and Maxime Schouppe, Information Officers (+31 (0)70 302 2337)
Ms Joanne Moore, Associate Information Officer (+31 (0)70 302 2394)
Peru institutes proceedings against Chile with regard to a dispute concerning maritime delimitation between the two States