other_document

Title
Other documents

Reply of the Kingdom of Thailand to the question put to the Parties by Judge Cançado Trindade

Question: In the present request for the indication of provisional measures by the
Court, it is stated, inter alia, that, as a result of the incidents occurred since 22 April
2011 in "the area of the Temple ofPreah Vihear", as weil as at other places along the

boundary between the two contending States, "fatalities, injuries and the
displacement of local inhabit~ n trs"aused.

What further information can be provided by the Parties to the Court about

Written replies of Nicaragua to the questions put to it by Judges Simma, Bennouna and Greenwood

Reply of the Republic ofNicaragua to the questions put by Judges Simma, Bennouna

and Greenwood at the end ofhearing on provisional measures requested by Costa Rica

in the case concerning Certain Activities carried out by Nicaragua in the Border Area

(Costa Rica v. Nicaragua)

Judge SIMMA:

1. Before the hearing of 11 January 2011, did Nicaragua ever make, or attempt to

Document submitted to the Court - Agreement between Australia and the Republic of Nauru for the Settlement of the Case

COUK INTERNATIONALEDE JUSTICE

MEMOIRE SLAIDOIRIES ET DOCUMENTS

AFFAIRE DE CERTAINESTERRES
A PHOSPHATESÀ NAURU

(NAURU c.AUSTRALIE)

VOLUME III
Contre-mémoirede l'Australie; procédureorale;
réponsesaux questionsosrespoilda;docurnenr

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

PLEADINGS, ORAL ARGUMENTS, DOCUMENTS

CASE CONCERNING
CERTAIN PHOSPHATE LANDS IN NAURU

(NAURU vAUSTRALIA)

Written comments of Belgium on the replies or supplementary replies of Senegal to the questions put by Members of the Court at the close of the hearing held on 16 March 2012 (translation)

INTERNATIONAL C OURT OF J USTICE

Questions relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite
(Belgium v. Senegal)

Comments of the Kingdom of Belgium on the replies given by the
Republic of Senegal to the questions put by certain judges

I. Comments on the replies given by Senegal to the question put by Judge Greenwood

Written Reply of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia to Question put by Judge Guillaume at the Hearing of 2 April 1993

The Hague,
THE EMBASSY OF THE SOCIALIST FEDERAL 30, GROOT HERTOGINNELAAN
REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA
INTHE NETHERLANDS

A 41/93-22
No. ....-.···-----··-······

Sir,

I have the honour to transmitt to you the answer from the legal

Adviser of the ~ederal Ministry of ~oreign Affairs, which revresents
the formal reply of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia to the questi­

Response of Senegal to the question put by Judge Cançado Trindade at the end of the public sitting of 8 April 2009 (translation)

Letter to the Registrar dated 15 April 2009 from

the Agent of the Republic of Senegal

[Translation]

Subject: Caseconcerning Questions relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite
(Belgium v. Senegal)

I have the honour to transmit to you the response of the Republic of Senegal to the question
put by Judge Cançado Trindade on 8 April 2009. It reads as follows:

“Senegal has the honour to respond to the question put to it by

Links