other_document

Title
Other documents

Observations of the Republic of Djibouti on the reply given by the French Republic to the question put by Judge Simma at the close of the first round of oral argument (translation)

Letter dated 1 February 2008 to the Registrar from the Deputy Agent

of the Republic of Djibouti

[Translation]

In reference to the explanations given by the French Republic on 29 January 2008 during the
second round of oral argument in reply to a question put by JudgeSimma on 25January2008
during the first round of oral argument, I have the honour, on the instructions of the Agent of the
Republic of Djibouti, to submit the following observations to the Court.

Written response of Greece to the question put by Judge Cançado Trindade at the end of the public sitting held on 16 September 2011 (translation)

R ESPONSE TO THE QUESTION PUT TO G REECE
BY J UDGE C ANÇADO T RINDADE

1. It should first be recalled that the Special Supreme Court (SSC) does not rank as a
supreme court within Greece’s legal order. The SSC has a sui generis legal status in the Greek
system of courts. With its dual jurisdic tional role under Article100 of the 1975 Greek

Written response of Georgia to the questions put by Judges Koroma and Cançado Trindade at the end of the public sitting held on Friday 17 September 2010

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

APPLICATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL COl'i'VENTION ON THE
ELI1\1INATION OF ALL FOR1VISOF RAClAL DISCRIMINATION

(GEORGIA v. RUSSIAN FEDERATION)

ANS\VERS OF GEORGIA TO JUDGES' QUlrSTIONS

24 SEPTEMBER 2010 A.NSW"ERSTO JUDGES' QUESTIONS

ANSWER TO QUESTION FROM JUDGE KOROMA

The question:

What precisely, in the view of the Parties, is the abject and purpose of the clause

Written response of Germany to the questions put by Judge Bennouna, Judge Cançado Trindade and Judge ad hoc Gaja at the end of the public sitting held on 16 September 2011

[Translation by the Registry]

I.) Question put to Germany by Judge Bennouna at the end of the public sitting of
16 September 2011

If no other remedy is available for individual victims of serious violations of human rights or

humanitarian law committed on their territory by a foreign State, would it be admissible for the
latter to raise a plea of immunity from jurisdiction jure imperii before the courts of the forum
State?

Reply of the Kingdom of Cambodia to the question put to the Parties by Judge Cançado Trindade (translation)

- 2 -

Letter to the Registrar dated 6 June 2011 from

the Agent of Cambodia

[Translation]

Please find below the replies of Cambodia to the questions put by Judge Cançado Trindade
at the end of the sitting of 31 May.

Cambodia has understood the questions as pertaining to the population displacements, firstly,

Comments of the Kingdom of Cambodia on the written reply of Thailand to the question put by Judge Yusuf at the end of the public sitting held on Wednesday 17 April 2013 at 3 p.m.

Letter to the Registrar dated 3 May 2013

from the Agent of Cambodia

[Translation]

Please find enclosed, in both French and English, the comments of Cambodia on Thailand’s
reply to the question put by Judge Yusuf, together with an accompanying map.

___________

Subscribe to other_document
Links