written_pleading

INTRODUCTION
WRITTEN STATEMENT
OF
THE REPUBLIC OF YEMEN
25 July 2023
1. The Republic of Yemen has the honour to submit this Written Statement in accordance with
the Order of the International Comi of Justice of3 February 2023 in the matter concerning
Legal Consequences arising fiwn the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied
Palestinian Territo,y, including East Jerusalem. This Written Statement briefly addresses
the issues referred to the Court by the United Nations General Assembly in resolution
77 /24 7 of 30 December 2022.

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION
LEGAL CONSEQUENCES ARISING FROM THE
POLICIES AND PRACTICES OF ISRAEL IN THE
OCCUPIED PALESTINIAN TERRITORY, INCLUDING
EAST JERUSALEM
WRITTEN STATEMENT OF ITALY
WRITTEN STATEMENT OF ITALY
INTRODUCTION
By Resolution 77/247 adopted on 30 December 2022, the General Assembly decided, in
accordance with Article 96 of the Charter of the United Nations, to request the International
Court of Justice, pursuant to Article 65 of the Statute of the Court, to render an advisory opinion

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
LEGAL CONSEQUENCES ARISING FROM THE
POLICIES AND PRACTICES OF ISRAEL IN THE OCCUPIED PALESTINIAN TERRITORY, INCLUDING EASTERN JERUSALEM
(REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION)
Written Comments of the Principality of Liechtenstein
Pursuant to the Order of the Court of 3 February 2023
17 July 2023
1

VOLUME I
24 July 2023
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
REQUEST FOR AN ADVISORY OPINION BY THE UNITED NATIONS
GENERAL ASSEMBLY IN RESOLUTION 77/247 OF 30 DECEMBER 2022
PERTAINING TO THE QUESTION OF PALESTINE
WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE STATE OF PALESTINE

Sr.q.rnuaNToFTHE Srnrn or Isru,nr, pURSUANT TorHE CouRt's OnnnRor3 Fnnnu.q,Rv
2023 nnIauNG To THE ADVISoRY PRoCEEDINGS INITIATED sy UN GTNNN,q.L ASSNMSI,Y
Rnsolurrox771247
The State of Israel attaches great importance to the peaceful settlement of disputes and to the significant
role carved out for the Intemational Court of Justice for this purpose. It moreover respects and
welcomes the appropriate use of the Court's advisory function in a manner consistent with the Court's
Statute.

OBSERVATIONS Of THE STATE OF ISRAEL ON THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA'S "URGENT
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL MEASURES UNDER ARTICLE 75(1) OF THE RULES OF COURT"
DATED 12 FEBRUARY 2024
1. Israel regrets that South Africa seeks once again to misuse the Court's provisional
measures procedure, this time by a highly peculiar and improper request that makes reference
to Article 75(1) of the Rules of Court.
2. At the outset, Israel again places on record its principled position that South Africa's

APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF
THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE IN THE GAZA STRIP (SOUTH AFRICA V. ISRAEL)
URGENT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL MEASURES UNDER ARTICLE 75(1) OF THE
RULES OF COURT OF THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
1. By way of an order dated 26 January 2024, the International Court of Justice ('IO') indicated
six provisional measures against Israel (Application of the Convention on the Prevention and
Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. Israel), Order of 26 January

1
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO INTERVENE
BY THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF NICARAGUA
in the case concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the
Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. Israel)
1. The Government of the Republic of Nicaragua has the honour to request permission of the Court
to intervene in the case concerning the Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment

1 APPLICATION INSTITUTING PROCEEDINGS To the Registrar of the International Court of Justice, the undersigned, being duly authorised by the Government of the Republic of South Africa, state as follows: In accordance with Articles 36 (1) and 40 of the Statute of the Court and Article 38 of the Rules of Court, I have the honour to submit this Application instituting proceedings in the name of the Republic of South Africa (“South Africa”) against the State of Israel (“Israel”).

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE_____________________________________________QUESTION OF THE DELIMITATION OF THECONTINENTAL SHELF BETWEENNICARAGUAAND COLOMBIA BEYOND 200 NAUTICAL MILES FROM THE NICARAGUANCOAST(NICARAGUA v. COLOMBIA)REJOINDEROF THE REPUBLIC OF COLOMBIA11 February2019