Provisional measures

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
APPLICATION
INSTITUTING PROCEEDINGS
containing a
REQUEST
FOR PROVISIONAL MEASURES
filed in the Registry of the Court
on 11th April 2024
APPLICATION OF THE VIENNA CONVENTION ON DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS
(MEXICO v. ECUADOR)
____________
COUR INTERNATIONALE DE JUSTICE
REQUÊTE
INTRODUCTIVE D’INSTANCE
assortie d’une
DEMANDE
EN INDICATION DE MESURES CONSERVATOIRES
enregistrée au Greffe de la Cour
le 11 avril 2024
APPLICATION DE LA CONVENTION DE VIENNE SUR LES RELATIONS DIPLOMATIQUES

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
Peace Palace, Carnegieplein 2, 2517 KJ The Hague, Netherlands
Tel.: +31 (0)70 302 2323 Fax: +31 (0)70 364 9928
Website X YouTube LinkedIn
Press Release
Unofficial
No. 2024/28
9 April 2024
Alleged Breaches of Certain International Obligations in respect of the Occupied Palestinian Territory (Nicaragua v. Germany) Request for the indication of provisional measures Conclusion of the public hearings held on Monday 8 and Tuesday 9 April 2024

The Embassy oft!te Syrian
Arab Republic
Brussels
a., · 114.-.> -II a., ... -11 !.):,- .. :.r- .~~
μ.9_r.
Letter from the Charged' Affaires of the Embassy of the Syrian Arab Republic in
Brussels addressed to
the Registrar of the International Court of Justice
Brussels - October 10, 2023
1. Referring to the conespondence received by the Syria11 Arab Republic (Syria) on June
9, 2023 from the International Court of Justice including the joint application (The
application) "to initiate proceedings on behalf of Canada and the Kingdom of the

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE AD HOC BARAK

DECLARATION OF JUDGE CHARLESWORTH
1. I have voted for the three provisional measures indicated by the Court, which supplement the measures contained in the Order of 26 January 2024. I regret, however, that subparagraph (2) (b) of the operative paragraph is drafted in such opaque terms that it fails to provide clear guidance to the Parties.
2. The case before the Court is brought in the context of an ongoing conflict that is causing enormous loss of life and human suffering. In January, the Court described the immediate background to this conflict in these terms:

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE NOLTE
Preconditions for the modification of an order on provisional measures under Article 76 of the Rules of Court  Modification as a form of implementation of an earlier provisional measure  Whether change of the situation in the Gaza Strip since 26 January 2024 justifies the modification.
1. I agree with the present Order. Given the current horrific situation of the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, raising any apparently technical legal issues now may seem out of place. However, I will do so in the interest of the Court’s future practice.

JOINT DECLARATION OF JUDGES XUE, BRANT, GÓMEZ ROBLEDO AND TLADI
1. In this Order, the measures indicated in subparagraph (2) are the key part of the dispositif. Although we all voted in favour of subparagraph (2) (b) of the dispositif, we deeply regret that this measure does not directly and explicitly order Israel to suspend its military operations for the purpose of addressing the current catastrophic humanitarian situation in Gaza.