Reply of Nicaragua

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

TERRITORIAL AND MARITIME DISPUTE
(NICARAGUA v. COLOMBIA)

REPLY OF THE

GOVERNMENT OF NICARAGUA

VOLUME I

18 SEPTEMBER 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................1 

I. ROCEDURAL H ISTORY ........................................................................................ 1 

Request by Costa Rica for the Indication of new Provisional Measures

REQUEST FOR THE INDICATION OF NEW PROVISIONAL MEASURES

A. INTRODUCTION

1. I have the honour to refer to the Application submitted to the Court on

18November 2010 by which proceedings were instituted on behalf of the Republic of Costa

Rica (Costa Rica) against the Republic of Nicaragua (Nicaragua) in Certain Activities Carried

Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua) and to the Court's Order on
1
provisional measures of 8 March 2011.

Statement of Mr Marc Mangel (expert called by Australia)

Appendix 2: M Mange!, An Assessment of Japanese Whale Research Programs
Under Special PermitAntarctic (JARPA, JARPA II) as Programsfor
of Whales, April 2011cResearch in the Context of Conservation and Management

An Assessment of Japanese Whale
Research Programs Under Special

Permit in the Antarctic (JARPA,
JARPA II) as Programs for

Purposes of Scientific Research in the
Context of Conservation and

Management of Whales

MarcMangeLPhD,FAAASF , RSE

Observations of Japan on the statements submitted by the experts called by Australia

MaiJr.JM)ebouœnt .m~aeetmUilëbysP~rJttdith E..Zeb,
a f'OI"erkair of·theJWC SâeutifieCunllittee

(PmvidedU1:t~P fP:~Oil i,~tQ ~ bythe(JQV~QfJt'iplfl)

Zeh-1tornmeŒs.oAnppendix2 ofAdated 3DeŒmbe 2012
Zeh--2:Commentsn15Apri110l3 MangetSnpplernentandOa:lesStdate19t.

May2:01~

• Clç:aCQ~ ~work fQr JARPAït ~11-ddi ole,lje tcstiJ~,
h~ .·~why th~~h isileede~ cleaï~ribëd iril.pla·n

eônsideŒbdëmit {p.9o:fZeh·l; leh~Z)

Written Statement of the International Fund for Agricultural Development

International Court of Justice

________________________

Judgment No. 2867 of the

Administrative Tribunal of the

International Labour Organization upon
a Complaint against the International

Fund for Agricultural Development

(Request for an Advisory Opinion)

Written Statement of the International

Fund for Agricultural Development

29 October 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Written Observations of Colombia

EMBAJADD AECOLOMBIA
LaHaya-LosPaisesBajos

Ubertodrden
The Hague, 26 May 2010

Dear Sir,

I refer to your letter dated 25 February 2010 informing that the Court has fixed
26 May 2010 as the time-limit for the filing ofwritten observations by the Parties in
the case concerning Territorial and Maritime Dispute (Nicaragua v. Colombia) with

regard to Costa Rica's Application for permission to intervene.

Written Observations of Thailand

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

REQUEST FOR INTERPRETATION OFTHE JUDGMENT OF 15 JUNE
1962 IN THE CASE CONCERNING THE TEMPLE OF PREAH VIHEAR
(CAMBODIAv.THAILAND)

(CAMBODIAv. THAILAND)

WRITTEN OBSERVATIONS

OF THE KINGDOM OF THAILAND

21 NOVEMBER 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION .................... 1

A. Procedural Matters ............................... 1

Memorial of Peru

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

MARITIME DISPUTE
(PERU vCHILE)

MEMORIAL OF THE
GOVERNMENT OF PERU

VOLUME 1

20 MARCH 2009 "States should bem:in mind:
(a) That legal disputes should as a
generalmle be refelTed by the parties

to the International Court of Justice , in
accordance with the provisions of the
Stahlte of the Court.

Recourse to judicial settlement of
legal disputes , palticularl y refen·al to
the Intemational Court of Justice ,

Reply of Peru

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

MARITIME DISPUTE
(PERUv.CHILE)

REPLY OF THE
GOVERNMENT OF PERU

VOLUME 1

9 NOVEMBER 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION 1

I. The Main Characteristics of Chile's Couoter­

Memorial 1

II. Peru and the Law of the Sea 8

Subscribe to
Links