Letter dated 10 June 2013 from the Agent of Japan

.10 June 2013

Dear Sir,

With reference to the case conceming Whaling in the Antarctic
(Australia v. Japan: New Zealand intervening), I have the honour to
acknowledge receipt ofyour letter No. 141981 dated 5 June 2013,
under caver ofwhich you transmitted a copy of the letter from Australia
submitting its observations with regard to my letter dated 31 May whereby
two notes prepared by Professor Judy Zeh ofthe University of Washington
were transmitted.

Reply of Nicaragua

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

TERRITORIAL AND MARITIME DISPUTE
(NICARAGUA v. COLOMBIA)

REPLY OF THE

GOVERNMENT OF NICARAGUA

VOLUME I

18 SEPTEMBER 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................1 

I. ROCEDURAL H ISTORY ........................................................................................ 1 

Request by Costa Rica for the Indication of new Provisional Measures

REQUEST FOR THE INDICATION OF NEW PROVISIONAL MEASURES

A. INTRODUCTION

1. I have the honour to refer to the Application submitted to the Court on

18November 2010 by which proceedings were instituted on behalf of the Republic of Costa

Rica (Costa Rica) against the Republic of Nicaragua (Nicaragua) in Certain Activities Carried

Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua) and to the Court's Order on
1
provisional measures of 8 March 2011.

Statement of Mr Marc Mangel (expert called by Australia)

Appendix 2: M Mange!, An Assessment of Japanese Whale Research Programs
Under Special PermitAntarctic (JARPA, JARPA II) as Programsfor
of Whales, April 2011cResearch in the Context of Conservation and Management

An Assessment of Japanese Whale
Research Programs Under Special

Permit in the Antarctic (JARPA,
JARPA II) as Programs for

Purposes of Scientific Research in the
Context of Conservation and

Management of Whales

MarcMangeLPhD,FAAASF , RSE

Observations of Japan on the statements submitted by the experts called by Australia

MaiJr.JM)ebouœnt .m~aeetmUilëbysP~rJttdith E..Zeb,
a f'OI"erkair of·theJWC SâeutifieCunllittee

(PmvidedU1:t~P fP:~Oil i,~tQ ~ bythe(JQV~QfJt'iplfl)

Zeh-1tornmeŒs.oAnppendix2 ofAdated 3DeŒmbe 2012
Zeh--2:Commentsn15Apri110l3 MangetSnpplernentandOa:lesStdate19t.

May2:01~

• Clç:aCQ~ ~work fQr JARPAït ~11-ddi ole,lje tcstiJ~,
h~ .·~why th~~h isileede~ cleaï~ribëd iril.pla·n

eônsideŒbdëmit {p.9o:fZeh·l; leh~Z)

Written Statement of the International Fund for Agricultural Development

International Court of Justice

________________________

Judgment No. 2867 of the

Administrative Tribunal of the

International Labour Organization upon
a Complaint against the International

Fund for Agricultural Development

(Request for an Advisory Opinion)

Written Statement of the International

Fund for Agricultural Development

29 October 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Written Observations of Colombia

EMBAJADD AECOLOMBIA
LaHaya-LosPaisesBajos

Ubertodrden
The Hague, 26 May 2010

Dear Sir,

I refer to your letter dated 25 February 2010 informing that the Court has fixed
26 May 2010 as the time-limit for the filing ofwritten observations by the Parties in
the case concerning Territorial and Maritime Dispute (Nicaragua v. Colombia) with

regard to Costa Rica's Application for permission to intervene.

Subscribe to
Links