INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
Peace Palace, Carnegieplein 2, 2517 KJ The Hague, Netherlands
Tel.: +31 (0)70 302 2323 Fax: +31 (0)70 364 9928
Website Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
Press Release
Unofficial
No. 2023/17
3 April 2023
Arbitral Award of 3 October 1899 (Guyana v. Venezuela) The Court to deliver its Judgment on Thursday 6 April 2023 at 3 p.m.

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
Peace Palace, Carnegieplein 2, 2517 KJ The Hague, Netherlands
Tel.: +31 (0)70 302 2323 Fax: +31 (0)70 364 9928
Website Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
Press Release
Unofficial
No. 2023/16
31 March 2023
Legal Consequences arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem (Request for Advisory Opinion) The Court authorizes the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation to participate in the proceedings

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
Peace Palace, Carnegieplein 2, 2517 KJ The Hague, Netherlands
Tel.: +31 (0)70 302 2323 Fax: +31 (0)70 364 9928
Website Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
Press Release
Unofficial
No. 2023/15
30 March 2023
Certain Iranian Assets (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America) The Court delivers its Judgment on the merits of the case

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
Peace Palace, Carnegieplein 2, 2517 KJ The Hague, Netherlands
Tel.: +31 (0)70 302 2323 Fax: +31 (0)70 364 9928
Website Twitter Account YouTube LinkedIn
Summary
Unofficial
Summary 2023/3
30 March 2023
Certain Iranian Assets (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America) Summary of the Judgment of 30 March 2023
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND (PARAS. 21-32)

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE AD HOC MOMTAZ
[Translation]
Jurisdiction of the Court  Claims relating to Bank Markazi’s rights under Articles III, IV and V of the Treaty of Amity  Jurisdiction ratione materiae of the Court  Primacy of the criterion of the nature of the transaction over the criterion of its function  Article I of the Treaty of Amity —Article I as a lodestar for interpretation of the Treaty’s provisions.

SEPARATE OPINION, PARTLY CONCURRING AND PARTLY DISSENTING, OF JUDGE AD HOC BARKETT
Abuse of rights — Iran seeking to exercise rights conferred on it by the Treaty “for purposes other than those for which the rights at issue were established”.
Exhaustion of local remedies — Exhaustion of local remedies not futile.
Article XX (1) (d) — United States demonstrated that Executive Order 13599 necessary to protect its essential security interests.