Order of 16 November 2023

Document Number
191-20231116-ORD-01-00-EN
Document Type
Date of the Document
Document File
Bilingual Document File

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
YEAR 2023
2023
16 November
General List
No. 191
16 November 2023
RIGHT TO STRIKE UNDER ILO CONVENTION NO. 87
REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION
ORDER
Present: President DONOGHUE; Vice-President GEVORGIAN; Judges YUSUF, XUE, SEBUTINDE, BHANDARI, SALAM, IWASAWA, NOLTE, CHARLESWORTH, BRANT; Registrar GAUTIER.
The International Court of Justice,
Composed as above,
After deliberation,
Having regard to Articles 48, 65 and 66, paragraphs 2 and 4, of the Statute of the Court and to Articles 104 and 105 of the Rules of Court,
Makes the following Order:
Whereas on 10 November 2023, at its 349th bis (special) Session, the Governing Body of the International Labour Organization (ILO) adopted, in accordance with Article 37, paragraph 1, of the Constitution of the ILO and Article IX, paragraph 2, of the Agreement between that Organization and the United Nations, a resolution by which it decided, pursuant to Article 65 of the Statute of the Court, to request the International Court of Justice to render an advisory opinion;
- 2 -
Whereas certified true copies of the English and French texts of that resolution were transmitted to the Court under cover of a letter from the Director-General of the ILO dated 13 November 2023 and received in the Registry of the Court on the same day;
Whereas the operative part of this resolution reads as follows:
“The Governing Body,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Decides, in accordance with article 37, paragraph 1, of the Constitution of the International Labour Organization,
1. To request the International Court of Justice to render urgently an advisory opinion under Article 65, paragraph 1, of the Statute of the Court, and under Article 103 of the Rules of Court, on the following question:
Is the right to strike of workers and their organizations protected under the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87)?
2. Instructs the Director-General to:
(a) transmit this resolution to the International Court of Justice, accompanied by all documents likely to throw light upon the question, in accordance with article 65, paragraph 2, of the Statute of the Court;
(b) respectfully request that the International Court of Justice allow for the participation in the advisory proceedings of the employers’ and workers’ organizations that enjoy general consultative status with the ILO;
(c) respectfully request that the International Court of Justice consider possible steps to accelerate the procedure, in accordance with Article 103 of the Rules of Court, so as to render an urgent answer to this request;
(d) inform the United Nations Economic and Social Council of this request, as required under article IX, paragraph 4, of the Agreement between the United Nations and the International Labour Organization, 1946”;
Whereas the Director-General of the ILO indicated in his letter that, pursuant to Article 65 of the Statute of the Court, all documents likely to throw light upon the question would be transmitted to the Court as soon as possible;
Whereas, by letters dated 14 November 2023, the Registrar gave notice of the request for an advisory opinion to all States entitled to appear before the Court, pursuant to Article 66, paragraph 1, of the Statute;
Whereas, in view of the fact that the Governing Body of the ILO has requested that the advisory opinion of the Court be rendered urgently, it is incumbent upon the Court to take necessary steps to accelerate the procedure, as contemplated by Article 103 of its Rules,
1. Decides that the International Labour Organization and the States parties to the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention (No. 87) are considered likely to be able to furnish information on the question submitted to the Court for an advisory opinion;
- 3 -
2. Fixes 16 May 2024 as the time-limit within which written statements on this question may be presented to the Court, in accordance with Article 66, paragraph 2, of the Statute;
3. Fixes 16 September 2024 as the time-limit within which States and organizations having presented written statements may submit written comments on the other written statements, in accordance with Article 66, paragraph 4, of the Statute;
4. Decides further that, in light of the particular tripartite structure of the International Labour Organization, which is comprised of representatives of Governments, employers and workers, six organizations having been granted general consultative status at the International Labour Organization by the Governing Body (the International Organisation of Employers, the International Trade Union Confederation, the World Federation of Trade Unions, the International Cooperative Alliance, the Organization of African Trade Union Unity and Business Africa) are also considered likely to be able to furnish information on the question submitted to the Court for an advisory opinion; and decides therefore to invite those organizations to make written contributions to the Court within the above time-limits;
Reserves the subsequent procedure for further decision.
Done in English and in French, the English text being authoritative, at the Peace Palace, The Hague, this sixteenth day of November, two thousand and twenty-three.
(Signed) Joan E. DONOGHUE,
President.
(Signed) Philippe GAUTIER,
Registrar.
___________

Bilingual Content

2023
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
REPORTS OF JUDGMENTS,
ADVISORY OPINIONS AND ORDERS
RIGHT TO STRIKE UNDER
ILO CONVENTION NO. 87
(REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION)
ORDER OF 16 NOVEMBER 2023
COUR INTERNATIONALE DE JUSTICE
RECUEIL DES ARRÊTS,
AVIS CONSULTATIFS ET ORDONNANCES
DROIT DE GRÈVE AU REGARD
DE LA CONVENTION NO 87 DE L’OIT
(REQUÊTE POUR AVIS CONSULTATIF)
ORDONNANCE DU 16 NOVEMBRE 2023
Official citation:
Right to Strike under ILO Convention No. 87,
Order of 16 November 2023, I.C.J. Reports 2023, p. 583
Mode officiel de citation :
Droit de grève au regard de la convention no 87 de l’OIT,
ordonnance du 16 novembre 2023, C.I.J. Recueil 2023, p. 583
© 2024 ICJ/CIJ, United Nations/Nations Unies
All rights reserved/Tous droits réservés
printed in france/imprimé en france
ISSN 0074-4441
ISBN 978-92-1-003345-9
e-ISBN 978-92-1-106917-4
Sales number
No de vente : 1305
RIGHT TO STRIKE UNDER
ILO CONVENTION NO. 87
(REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION)
DROIT DE GRÈVE AU REGARD
DE LA CONVENTION NO 87 DE L’OIT
(REQUÊTE POUR AVIS CONSULTATIF)
16 NOVEMBER 2023
ORDER
16 NOVEMBRE 2023
ORDONNANCE
583
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
YEAR 2023
16 November 2023
RIGHT TO STRIKE UNDER
ILO CONVENTION NO. 87
(REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION)
ORDER
Present: President Donoghue; Vice-President Gevorgian; Judges Yusuf,
Xue, Sebutinde, Bhandari, Salam, Iwasawa, Nolte, Charlesworth,
Brant; Registrar Gautier.
The International Court of Justice,
Composed as above,
After deliberation,
Having regard to Articles 48, 65 and 66, paragraphs 2 and 4, of the Statute
of the Court and to Articles 104 and 105 of the Rules of Court,
Makes the following Order:
Whereas on 10 November 2023, at its 349th bis (special) Session, the
Governing Body of the International Labour Organization (ILO) adopted, in
accordance with Article 37, paragraph 1, of the Constitution of the ILO and
Article IX, paragraph 2, of the Agreement between that Organization and
the United Nations, a resolution by which it decided, pursuant to Article 65
of the Statute of the Court, to request the International Court of Justice to
render an advisory opinion;
Whereas certified true copies of the English and French texts of that resolution
were transmitted to the Court under cover of a letter from the
Director-General of the ILO dated 13 November 2023 and received in the
Registry of the Court on the same day;
2023
16 November
General List
No. 191
583
2023
16 novembre
Rôle général
no 191
COUR INTERNATIONALE DE JUSTICE
ANNÉE 2023
16 novembre 2023
DROIT DE GRÈVE AU REGARD
DE LA CONVENTION NO 87 DE L’OIT
(REQUÊTE POUR AVIS CONSULTATIF)
ORDONNANCE
Présents : Mme Donoghue, présidente ; M. Gevorgian, vice-président ;
MM. Yusuf, Mmes Xue, Sebutinde, MM. Bhandari, Salam,
Iwasawa, Nolte, Mme Charlesworth,
M. Brant, juges ;
M. Gautier, greffier.
La Cour internationale de Justice,
Ainsi composée,
Après délibéré en chambre du conseil,
Vu les articles 48, 65 et 66, paragraphes 2 et 4, du Statut de la Cour et les
articles 104 et 105 de son Règlement,
Rend l’ordonnance suivante :
Considérant que, le 10 novembre 2023, à sa 349e bis session (spéciale), le
Conseil d’administration de l’Organisation internationale du Travail (OIT) a
adopté, conformément au paragraphe 1 de l’article 37 de la Constitution de
l’OIT et au paragraphe 2 de l’article IX de l’accord entre les Nations Unies et
l’OIT, une résolution par laquelle il a décidé, se référant à l’article 65 du
Statut, de demander à la Cour internationale de Justice de donner un avis
consultatif ;
Considérant que des copies certifiées conformes des versions anglaise
et française de la résolution susmentionnée ont été transmises à la Cour
sous le couvert d’une lettre du directeur général de l’OIT datée du
13 novembre 2023 et reçue au Greffe le même jour ;
584 right to strike (order 16 XI 23)
Whereas the operative part of this resolution reads as follows:
“The Governing Body,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Decides, in accordance with article 37, paragraph 1, of the Constitution
of the International Labour Organization,
1. To request the International Court of Justice to render urgently an
advisory opinion under Article 65, paragraph 1, of the Statute of the
Court, and under Article 103 of the Rules of Court, on the following
question:
Is the right to strike of workers and their organizations protected
under the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to
Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87)?
2. Instructs the Director-General to:
(a) transmit this resolution to the International Court of Justice,
accompanied by all documents likely to throw light upon the
question, in accordance with article 65, paragraph 2, of the Statute
of the Court;
(b) respectfully request that the International Court of Justice allow
for the participation in the advisory proceedings of the employers’
and workers’ organizations that enjoy general consultative
status with the ILO;
(c) respectfully request that the International Court of Justice
consider possible steps to accelerate the procedure, in accordance
with Article 103 of the Rules of Court, so as to render an
urgent answer to this request;
(d) inform the United Nations Economic and Social Council of this
request, as required under article IX, paragraph 4, of the Agreement
between the United Nations and the International Labour
Organization, 1946”;
Whereas the Director-General of the ILO indicated in his letter that,
pursuant to Article 65 of the Statute of the Court, all documents likely to
throw light upon the question would be transmitted to the Court as soon as
possible;
Whereas, by letters dated 14 November 2023, the Registrar gave notice of
the request for an advisory opinion to all States entitled to appear before the
Court, pursuant to Article 66, paragraph 1, of the Statute;
Whereas, in view of the fact that the Governing Body of the ILO has
requested that the advisory opinion of the Court be rendered urgently, it is
incumbent upon the Court to take necessary steps to accelerate the procedure,
as contemplated by Article 103 of its Rules,
1. Decides that the International Labour Organization and the States
parties to the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise
droit de grève (ordonnance 16 XI 23) 584
Considérant que le dispositif de cette résolution est ainsi libellé :
« Le Conseil d’administration,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Décide, conformément à l’article 37, paragraphe 1, de la Constitution
de l’OIT :
1. de demander à la Cour internationale de Justice de rendre d’urgence,
en vertu de l’article 65, paragraphe 1, de son Statut et de l’article 103
de son Règlement, un avis consultatif sur la question suivante :
Le droit de grève des travailleurs et de leurs organisations est-il
protégé par la convention (no 87) sur la liberté syndicale et la protection
du droit syndical, 1948 ?
2. Charge le Directeur général :
a) de transmettre la présente résolution à la Cour internationale de
Justice, accompagnée de tout document pouvant servir à élucider
la question, conformément à l’article 65, paragraphe 2, du Statut
de la Cour ;
b) de demander respectueusement à la Cour internationale de
Justice de permettre que les organisations d’employeurs et de travailleurs
ayant un statut consultatif général auprès de l’OIT
participent à la procédure consultative ;
c) de demander respectueusement à la Cour internationale de Justice
d’examiner les mesures possibles pour accélérer la procédure,
conformément à l’article 103 du Règlement de la Cour, de
manière à répondre d’urgence à cette demande ;
d) d’informer le Conseil économique et social des Nations Unies de
cette demande, conformément à l’article IX, paragraphe 4, de
l’Accord entre les Nations Unies et l’Organisation internationale
du Travail, 1946 » ;
Considérant que le directeur général de l’OIT a indiqué dans sa lettre que,
conformément à l’article 65 du Statut, tous documents pouvant servir à
élucider la question seraient communiqués à la Cour dans les meilleurs
délais ;
Considérant que, par lettres datées du 14 novembre 2023, le greffier a notifié
la requête pour avis consultatif à tous les États admis à ester devant la
Cour, conformément au paragraphe 1 de l’article 66 du Statut ;
Considérant que, le Conseil d’administration de l’OIT ayant demandé que
l’avis consultatif de la Cour soit donné d’urgence, il incombe à celle-ci de
prendre toutes les mesures utiles pour accélérer la procédure, comme prévu
par l’article 103 de son Règlement,
1. Décide que l’Organisation internationale du Travail et les États parties
à la convention (no 87) sur la liberté syndicale et la protection du droit syndi585
right to strike (order 16 XI 23)
Convention (No. 87) are considered likely to be able to furnish information
on the question submitted to the Court for an advisory opinion;
2. Fixes 16 May 2024 as the time-limit within which written statements
on this question may be presented to the Court, in accordance with Article 66,
paragraph 2, of the Statute;
3. Fixes 16 September 2024 as the time-limit within which States and
organizations having presented written statements may submit written
comments on the other written statements, in accordance with Article 66,
paragraph 4, of the Statute;
4. Decides further that, in light of the particular tripartite structure of the
International Labour Organization, which is comprised of representatives of
Governments, employers and workers, six organizations having been
granted general consultative status at the International Labour Organization
by the Governing Body (the International Organisation of Employers, the
International Trade Union Confederation, the World Federation of Trade
Unions, the International Cooperative Alliance, the Organization of African
Trade Union Unity and Business Africa) are also considered likely to be able
to furnish information on the question submitted to the Court for an advisory
opinion; and decides therefore to invite those organizations to make
written contributions to the Court within the above time-limits;
Reserves the subsequent procedure for further decision.
Done in English and in French, the English text being authoritative, at the
Peace Palace, The Hague, this sixteenth day of November, two thousand and
twenty-three.
(Signed) Joan E. Donoghue,
President.
(Signed) Philippe Gautier,
Registrar.
droit de grève (ordonnance 16 XI 23) 585
cal sont jugés susceptibles de fournir des renseignements sur la question
soumise à la Cour pour avis consultatif ;
2. Fixe au 16 mai 2024 la date d’expiration du délai dans lequel des exposés
écrits sur cette question pourront être présentés à la Cour, conformément
au paragraphe 2 de l’article 66 du Statut ;
3. Fixe au 16 septembre 2024 la date d’expiration du délai dans lequel les
États et les organisations qui auront présenté un exposé écrit pourront
présenter des observations écrites sur les autres exposés écrits, conformément
au paragraphe 4 de l’article 66 du Statut ;
4. Décide en outre que, compte tenu de la structure tripartite particulière
de l’Organisation internationale du Travail, composée de représentants des
gouvernements, des employeurs et des travailleurs, six organisations
auxquelles le Conseil d’administration a accordé le statut consultatif général
auprès de l’Organisation internationale du Travail (l’Organisation internationale
des employeurs, la Confédération syndicale internationale, la
Fédération syndicale mondiale, l’Alliance coopérative internationale, l’Organisation
de l’unité syndicale africaine et Business Africa) sont également
jugées susceptibles de fournir des renseignements sur la question soumise à
la Cour pour avis consultatif ; et décide par conséquent d’inviter ces organisations
à lui présenter des exposés écrits dans les délais susmentionnés ;
Réserve la suite de la procédure.
Fait en anglais et en français, le texte anglais faisant foi, au Palais de la
Paix, à La Haye, le seize novembre deux mille vingt-trois.
La présidente,
(Signé) Joan E. Donoghue.
Le greffier,
(Signé) Philippe Gautier.
ISBN 978-92-1-003345-9

ICJ document subtitle

Fixing of time-limits: Presentation of the written statements and written comments on those statements

Document file FR
Document Long Title

Order of 16 November 2023 

Links