INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
CASE CONCERNING
APPLICATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE SUPPRESSION
OF THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM AND OF THE INTERNATIONAL
CONVENTION ON THE ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF RACIAL
DISCRIMINATION
(Ukraine v. Russian Federation)
COUNTER-MEMORIAL ON THE CASE CONCERNING APPLICATION OF
THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON THE ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS
OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION
Submitted by the Russian Federation
Volume XIV
(Annexes 1214 - 1333)
9 August 2021
The Annexes contained in this Volume are either true copies of the original documents referred to in
the Counter-Memorial, or translations (marked accordingly) from their original language into
English, an official language of the Court, pursuant to Article 51 of the Rules of Court.
Pursuant to Article 51(3) of the Rules of Court, some translations are confined to parts of the annexes,
as indicated at the beginning of the respective annexes. In further compliance with this Rule, the
Russian Federation has provided two certified copies of the full documents in their original language
with its submission. The Russian Federation stands ready to provide more extensive partial
translations or a complete translation of submitted documents should the Court so require.
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
VOLUME XIV
Annex 1214 YouTube, “A requiem evening in memory of Noman Ḉelebicihan was held at the
CEPU”, 24 February 2015
Annex 1215 YouTube, “Prayer service dedicated to the victims of the deportation that took place
in Simferopol”, 18 May 2015
Annex 1216 YouTube, “Crimean authorities promise Crimean Tatars a memorial to the victims of
the deportation (video)”, 18 May 2015
Annex 1217 YouTube, “The world’s biggest Crimean Tatar flag unfurled in Simferopol”,
27 June 2015
Annex 1218 YouTube, “Automobile rally with Crimean Tatar flags”, 26 June 2015
Annex 1219 YouTube, “Crimean Tatar Flag Day in Crimea”, 26 June 2015
Annex 1220 YouTube, Ukraine Crisis Media Center, “Civil blockade of Crimea: how it will be”,
8 September 2015
Annex 1221 BBC, “Ukraine crisis: Crimea in the dark in Russia power row”, 26 November 2015
Annex 1222 School Academy of Bakhchisaray official website, “Visit to an exhibition in the
Khan’s Palace”, 10 October 2016
Annex 1223 “The wooden elements of the Mosque roofing”, photographic materials from the
archive of the State Budgetary Institution of the Republic of Crimea “Bakhchisaray
Historical, Cultural and Archaeological Museum-Reserve”, December 2016
Annex 1224 “Condition of the load-bearing part of the rafter system of the northern roof pitch of
the Mosque”, video materials from the archive of the State Budgetary Institution of
the Republic of Crimea “Bakhchisaray Historical, Cultural and Archaeological
Museum-Reserve”, 9 February 2017
Annex 1225 Video footage of the public event in the form of a demonstration using automobiles
in Bakhchisaray, 18 May 2017 as attached to the Letter of the Acting Chair of the
Bakhchisaray District Court of the Republic of Crimea No. 2020-2/1265 of 20 May
2020
Annex 1226 YouTube, “Day of Remembrance for the victims of the deportation from Crimea.
Sudak”, 18 May 2017
Annex 1227 5th Channel, “Time. Daily Round-up”, Interview with Mr Refat Chubarov, 8 March
2018
Annex 1228 Crimean Tatars Club website, “Crimean Tatars stand united on a day of mourning”,
18 May 2018
2
Annex 1229 YouTube, Millet, “Reconstruction of the Mosque of the Khan’s Palace in
Bakhchisaray (Crimea)”, 14 September 2018
Annex 1230 YouTube, “Memory of Noman Ḉelebicihan has been honored in Sevastopol”,
23 February 2019
Annex 1231 Collegium School of Alushta, Ethnographic museum “Bereginya”, 2021
Annex 1232 Fevzi Yakubov Crimean Engineering and Pedagogical University, Photographs of
the display of the Museum of Ukrainian Ethnic Studies, 2021
Annex 1233 Yalta Secondary School No. 15, Photographs from cultural events held at school
between 2014 and 2021
Annex 1234 Types of migration statuses acquired by Crimean residents as a result of Crimea’s
accession to the Russian Federation
Annex 1235 Diplomas of Kiramet LLC
Annex 1236 Letters of appreciation of Kiramet LLC
Annex 1237 Website “Mirotvorets”, page dedicated to , 29 April 2018
Annex 1238 List of federal cultural heritage sites belonging to the Crimean Tatar culture and
registered in the unified state register of cultural heritage sites (historical and cultural
monuments) of the peoples of the Russian Federation
Annex 1239 Restoration assignment for development of research and design documents for the
restoration of the architectural monument of the 16th – 18th centuries: the Great
Khan Mosque, approved by the Head of the State Service for Cultural Heritage
Protection of Ukraine, М.М. Kucheruk, 2003 (excerpts)
Annex 1240 Letter of the Head of the National Writers’ Union of Ukraine to the Head of the
Council of Ministers of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea No. 502/01-12,
6 September 2005
Annex 1241 Letter of non-governmental organizations to the Mayor of Yalta, 14 March 2007
Annex 1242 Letter of Chairman of the Congress, Coordination Council of Ukrainians of the South
of Crimea to the Mayor of Yalta, 11 October 2010
Annex 1243 Al-Wa’i (Consciousness), Muslims, declare a righteous Caliphate according to the
method of prophecy with Hizb ut-Tahrir and do not ask for help from the West, No.
291, March 2011 (excerpts)
Annex 1244 Mr Kuzmin’s employment record book
Annex 1245 Lease agreement No. A-46/12, 28 September 2012 (excerpts)
Annex 1246 Leaflet on the procedure for opting out of Russian citizenship, 2014
Annex 1247 Website of the Mejlis, “Mustafa Dzhemilev: Crimean Tatars will hold their own
referendum to determine the future of Crimea”, 27 March 2014
3
Annex 1248 Website of the Mejlis, “Head of the Mejlis: When we see that it is necessary to show
a clear and explicit will of the Crimean Tatar people, we will hold a referendum”,
29 March 2014 (excerpts)
Annex 1249 Website of the Mejlis, Decision of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People “On
addressing practical issues relating to the settlement of the Crimean Tatar people
under the existing circumstances of Crimea”, 1 April 2014 (excerpts)
Annex 1250 Website “Mirotvorets”, page dedicated to Mr Zaur Smirnov, 29 April 2015
Annex 1251 Website of the Mejlis, Resolution of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People “On the
situation regarding the Russian Federation officials’ ban for Mustafa Dzhemilev to
enter his homeland – Crimea”, 2 May 2014
Annex 1252 Decision of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People No. 24 “On a member of the
Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People Remzi Ilyasov”, 23 August 2014
Annex 1253 Decision of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people No. 21 “On a member of the
Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People, the Deputy Chairman of the Mejlis of the
Crimean Tatar People, Zaur Smirnov”, 23 August 2014
Annex 1254 Decision of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people No. 22 “On a member of the
Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People, the Head of the Legal Department of the Mejlis
of the Crimean Tatar People, Teyfuk Gafarov”, 23 August 2014
Annex 1255 Facebook page of Anton Geraschenko, former Deputy of the Verkhovna Rada, “To
me, as well as to many well-known journalists...”, 16 December 2014
Annex 1256 Website “Mirotvorets”, page dedicated to Mr Seytumer Nimetullaev, 18 January
2015 (excerpts)
Annex 1257 Center for Journalist Investigations, “Natalia Kokorina left the FSB building”,
13 March 2015
Annex 1258 Council under the auspices of the President of the Russian Federation for the
Development of Civil Society and Human Rights, “Crimean Tatars turned to Putin
with a request to preserve the heritage of the people – ATR TV channel”, 24 March
2015
Annex 1259 Website “Mirotvorets”, page dedicated to Mr Lenur Usmanov, 19 March 2015
Annex 1260 Intentionally omitted
Annex 1261 Website “Mirotvorets”, page dedicated to Mr Eyvaz Umerov, 20 September 2015
Annex 1262 Donbass Info Website, “Mustafa Dzhemilev. Criminal road to wealth. Part 2”,
4 December 2015 (excerpts)
Annex 1263 Anha, “What is the Tahrir party doing in the Shahba areas?”, 24 February 2016
(excerpts)
Annex 1264 Facebook page of Ms Lilya Budzhurova, post of 2 April 2016
4
Annex 1265 Voinka village administration, Decree No. 111 “On holding events on 18 May
2016”, 29 April 2016
Annex 1266 Center for Journalist Investigations, “Now they are our children”, 24 May 2016
Annex 1267 Documents submitted to the Registry of the ICJ by the Russian Federation in
connection with Ukraine’s Request for the indication of provisional measures and
Judges’ Folder submitted by the Russian Federation for the Hearings on Provisional
Measures, 6-9 March 2017
Annex 1268 CV ,
4 April 2017
Annex 1269 Website “Mirotvorets“, page dedicated to 4 January 2018
Annex 1270 Website of the Mejlis, “Appeal of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People“, 12 March
2018
Annex 1271 Hizb ut-Tahrir in Ukraine, Fazyl Amzaev, Hizb ut-Tahrir’s activities in non-Muslim
countries: goals and methods, 16 August 2019 (excerpts)
Annex 1272 Crimean Digest, No. 3, September 2020
Annex 1273 Official website of the International Festival Great Russian Word, “Overview on the
International Festival GREAT RUSSIAN WORD”, 14 February 2020
Annex 1274 Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir in Wilayah, “Neither America, nor Russia, nor
Europe, Trusting these Kuffar is a Political and Military Suicide!”, 29 February 2020
Annex 1275 Statement of the Chairman of the Mejlis on the possibility of water supply to Crimea,
6 March 2020
Annex 1276 Supreme Court of the Republic of Crimea official website, “Supreme Court of the
Republic of Crimea reads out the sentence to L.E. Islyamov”, 10 December 2020
(excerpts)
Annex 1277 Mustafa Dzhemilev Talks, Reports at sessions and conferences of Qurultay of the
Crimean Tatar People 1991-2001, Simferopol, Odzhak, 2001 (excerpts)
Annex 1278 Wikipedia, “Noman Ḉelebicihan”, as at 4 March 2021
Annex 1279 Wikipedia in Russian, “Qurultay of the Crimean Tatar People”, as at 4 March 2021
(excerpts)
Annex 1280 Table of contradictions in the evidence presented by Ukraine in connection with the
scuffle that occurred at the conference in Simferopol on 17 January 2015
Annex 1281 President of the Russian Federation official website, “Sanctions for offences during
the preparation of and holding mass demonstrations, comparative table”
Annex 1282 Electronic Justice, Court proceedings data confirming the absence of any legal action
taken by Krymska Svitlytsya against “Krymsoyuzpechat” before Russian courts
5
Annex 1283 CV of
Annex 1284 CV of
Annex 1285 CV of
Annex 1286 Website of the “Myrotvorets.center” (“Mirotvorets”), as at 12 June 2021 (excerpts)
Annex 1287 K.N. Akhmadeev, “The Turkish factor in the Crimean Tatar ethnopolitical process”,
Society: politics, economics, law, No. 3, 2018 (excerpts)
Annex 1288 A.V. Yurasov (ed.), History of Crimea: in two volumes, Institute of Russian History
of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vol. 1, Kuchkovo pole, Moscow, 2019
(excerpts)
Annex 1289 V.V. Fedunov, A.V. Staritsyn, “Organisational and Legal Activities of the Taurida
Governorate’s Zemstvo in 1887–1908”, Topical Issues of Russian Law, No. 10, 2017
(excerpts)
Annex 1290 M.A. Aradzhioni, “The Greeks of Crimea: on the History of Community Formation
in the Late Middle Ages – Modern Times”, Materials on Archaeology, History, and
Ethnography of Tavria: Collection of Research Papers, Simferopol, Issue XIII, 2007
(excerpts)
Annex 1291 Ya.E.Vodarsky, O.I. Eliseeva, V.M. Kabuzan, “Crimean Population in the Late 18th
– the Late 20th Centuries (Number, Settlement, Ethnic Composition)”, Institute of
Russian History of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow , 2003 (excerpts)
Annex 1292 O.A. Gabrielyan, V.P., Petrov, Crimean Repatriates: Deportation, Return, and
Settlement, Simferopol, 1998 (excerpts)
Annex 1293 Milliy Firqa website, “The Crimean Tatar People’s Front is established in Crimea”,
30 January 2012 (excerpts)
Annex 1294 T.A. Senyushkina, “The Islamic factor in the confessional space of Crimea”, Russian
and the Muslim World”, No. 3, 2018 (excerpts)
Annex 1295 T. Senyushkina, “Social and Political Situation in Crimea”, Russian and the Muslim
World, No. 10, 2013 (excerpts)
Annex 1296 Territorial Body of the Federal State Statistics Service for the Republic of Crimea,
“Main Trends of Migratory Movement of the Population of the Republic of Crimea
in 2014”, Press issue, 2015
Annex 1297 Territorial Body of the Federal State Statistics Service for the Republic of Crimea,
“Main Results of Migratory Movement of the Population of the Republic of Crimea
in 2015”, Press issue, 2016
6
Annex 1298 Territorial Body of the Federal State Statistics Service for the Republic of Crimea,
Report “Social and Economic Situation of the Republic of Crimea in January 2017”,
Simferopol, 2017 (excerpts)
Annex 1299 Territorial Body of the Federal State Statistics Service for the Republic of Crimea,
Report “Social and Economic Situation of the Republic of Crimea in January–
December 2017”, Simferopol, 2018 (excerpts)
Annex 1300 Directorate of the Federal State Statistics Service for the Republic of Crimea and
Sevastopol, “Main Results of Migratory Movement of the Population of the Republic
of Crimea in 2018”, Press issue, Simferopol, 2019
Annex 1301 Directorate of the Federal State Statistics Service for the Republic of Crimea and
Sevastopol, Report “Social and Economic Situation of the Republic of Crimea in
January–December 2019”, Simferopol, 2020 (excerpts)
Annex 1302 A. A. Ibraimov, “Ethnopolitical processes in Crimea and their impact on Russia’s
interests in the region”, Bulletin of the University, No. 8, 2013 (excerpts)
Annex 1303 Directorate of the Federal State Statistics Service for the Republic of Crimea and
Sevastopol, Report “Social and Economic Situation of the Republic of Crimea in
January–December 2020”, Simferopol, 2021 (excerpts)
Annex 1304 Directorate of the Federal State Statistics Service for the Republic of Crimea and
Sevastopol, “Main Results of Migratory Movement of the Population of Sevastopol
in 2017”, Press issue, Sevastopol, 2018
Annex 1305 Directorate of the Federal State Statistics Service for the Republic of Crimea and
Sevastopol, Report “Social and Economic Situation of Sevastopol in January 2019”,
Sevastopol, 2019 (excerpts)
Annex 1306 Directorate of the Federal State Statistics Service for the Republic of Crimea and
Sevastopol, Report “Social and Economic Situation of Sevastopol in January 2020”,
Sevastopol, 2020 (excerpts)
Annex 1307 State Statistics Committee of Ukraine, “Statistical Yearbook of Ukraine for 2008”,
Kiev, 2009 (excerpts)
Annex 1308 State Statistics Committee of Ukraine, “Statistical Yearbook of Ukraine for 2009”,
Kiev, 2010 (excerpts)
Annex 1309 State Statistics Service of Ukraine, “Population of Ukraine for 2010. Demographic
Yearbook”, Kiev, 2011 (excerpts)
Annex 1310 State Statistics Service of Ukraine, “Population of Ukraine for 2011. Demographic
Yearbook”, Kiev, 2012 (excerpts)
Annex 1311 Milliy Firqa website, “Russia recognised Milliy Firqa”, 31 July 2014
7
Annex 1312 Mass media outlets registered during the period from 18 March 2014 to 3 June 2021,
whose products are mainly aimed at the Crimean Tatar and/or Ukrainian community
and are distributed/was distributed (i) in the territory of the Republic of Crimea, (ii)
in the territory of the city of Sevastopol, or (iii) in the territory of the Russian
Federation with the editorial office address in the Republic of Crimea and the city of
Sevastopol, 2021
Annex 1313 Roskomnadzor, List of Ukrainian printed periodicals which received a permit to
distribute the products of foreign periodicals in the territory of the Russian
Federation, as at 3 June 2021
Annex 1314 Website of the Mejlis, Resolution of the 2nd (Extraordinary) Session of the 3rd
Qurultay of the Crimean Tatar People, 20 December 1997
Annex 1315 FederalPress, “Court of Nizhnevartovsk convicted a member of a terrorist
organization”, 26 April 2006
Annex 1316 Federal Constitutional Law No. 1-FKZ ”On amending Article 4 of the Federal
Constitutional Law ‘On the admission of the Republic of Crimea into the Russian
Federation and the formation of new constituent entities within the Russian
Federation - the Republic of Crimea and the federal city of Sevastopol’”, 11 June
2021
Annex 1317 UNIAN, “Baloha admits involvement in funding Right Sector”, 23 July 2015
Annex 1318 Hromadske, “Far-Right Group C14 Wins Funding From Ukrainian Government”,
14 June 2018
Annex 1319 Unified State Register of Cultural Heritage Sites (Historical and Cultural
Monuments) of the Peoples of the Russian Federation, entries for the “Moscow
Kremlin” and the “Khan’s Palace”, 14 July 2021 (excerpts)
Annex 1320 RIA Novosti, “The Ukrainian Community of Crimea calls on Kiev to stay out of
Russia’s affairs”, 15 November 2017 (excerpts)
Annex 1321 Letter of the Co-Agent of Ukraine to the President of the International Court of
Justice, 18 January 2019
Annex 1322 Regnum, “Decision issued in Tyumen in a case on extremism in the social media”,
5 November 2013
Annex 1323 Rossiyskaya Gazeta, “Members of Hizb ut-Tahrir cell arrested in Crimea”, 13 May
2016
Annex 1324 Interfax, “The decision against the participants of the Bakhchisaray cell of Hizb ut-
Tahrir will be announced on 16 September”, 10 September 2020
Annex 1325 RIA Novisti Krym, “Neutralizing a terrorist: past and present of Hizb ut-Tahrir* in
Crimea”, 27 March 2019 (excerpts)
Annex 1326 RIA Novosti Krym, “Kurtseit Abdullayev: criminal profile”, 23 November 2017
Annex 1327 TASS, “Number of extremist crimes halves in the course of 2019”, 17 March 2020
8
Annex 1328 Directorate of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia for the Republic of Crimea
and Sevastopol, Information note on measures taken to assist people confined in the
penitentiary institutions of the Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol in exercising their
right to obtain Russian citizenship in accordance with Federal Constitutional Law of
21 March 2014 No. 6-FKZ “On the admission of the Republic of Crimea into the
Russian Federation and the formation of new constituent entities within the Russian
Federation - the Republic of Crimea and the federal city of Sevastopol” and to
decline to obtain it, 15 July 2021
Annex 1329 Directorate of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia for the Republic of Crimea
and Sevastopol, Information note on places where the convicts O.G. Sentsov and
A.Z. Chiygoz served their sentences, 15 July 2021
Annex 1330 Information and reference material on procedure of acquiring citizenship of the
Russian Federation by Crimean residents as attached to the Letter of the Main
Migration Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation
No. 20/25495, 27 July 2021
Annex 1331 Intentionally omitted
Annex 1332 O.M. Kostikova, M.S. Lisenko, Literature Reading, 4th grade, Study guide for
general educational institutions with instruction in Ukrainian and Russian,
Prosveshchenie, Moscow, 2018 (excerpts)
Annex 1333 N.M. Borisyuk, Ukrainian language (Native), 4th grade, Study guide for general
educational institutions with instruction in Ukrainian and Russian, Prosveshchenie,
Moscow, 2018 (excerpts)
Annex 1214
YouTube, “A requiem evening in memory of Noman Ḉelebicihan was
held at the CEPU”, 24 February 2015
YouTube, “A requiem evening in memory of Noman Ḉelebicihan was held at the CEPU”, 24 February 2015,
available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v= NvM1KWhURE
Annex 1214
Annex 1215
YouTube, “Prayer service dedicated to the victims of the deportation
that took place in Simferopol”, 18 May 2015
YouTube, “Prayer service dedicated to the victims of the deportation that took place in Simferopol”,
18 May 2015, available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cP6FE-QhupI
Annex 1215
Annex 1216
YouTube, “Crimean authorities promise Crimean Tatars a memorial to
the victims of the deportation (video)”, 18 May 2015
YouTube, “Crimean authorities promise Crimean Tatars a memorial to the victims of the deportation
(video)”, that shows the foundation of the memorial to the victims of the deportation in Bakhchisaray,
18 May 2015, available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ba2Q96mBk9o
Annex 1216
Annex 1217
YouTube, “The world’s biggest Crimean Tatar flag unfurled in
Simferopol”, 27 June 2015
YouTube, “The world’s biggest Crimean Tatar flag unfurled in Simferopol” 27 June 2015, available at:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYXzoW0925s
Annex 1217
Annex 1218
YouTube, “Automobile rally with Crimean Tatar flags”, 26 June 2015
YouTube, “Automobile rally with Crimean Tatar flags” that shows the largest motor rally dedicated to
Crimean Tatar Flag Day, 26 June 2015, available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41qI6vsk-0Q
Annex 1218
Annex 1219
YouTube, “Crimean Tatar Flag Day in Crimea”, 26 June 2015
YouTube, “Crimean Tatar Flag Day in Crimea”, 26 June 2015, available at:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MuRbl2HlMs0
Annex 1219
Annex 1220
YouTube, Ukraine Crisis Media Center, “Civil blockade of Crimea:
how it will be”, 8 September 2015
Translation
Ukraine Crisis Media Center, “Civil blockade of Crimea: how it will be”, 8 September 2015,
available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RBS9FgXCBtg
Partial transcript of the video
(Time period: 18:15 - 19:03)
Mustafa Dzhemilev: So the purpose of this campaign is to draw the public’s attention to outrageous things
happening at this border and to settle our relations with the occupation authorities somehow. Bandits who
despise and mock our compatriots in the occupied territory should not be fed. We will lay down our terms
but, of course, we would not want our actions to be contrary to those of our leadership, so we will try to
coordinate our actions as much as possible. A meeting with the President is planned today, and we will
discuss our steps in detail.
(Time period: 21:09 – 23:08)
Lenur Islyamov: Good afternoon, gentlemen, journalists, colleagues. I’ve been here for four months
already, and all these four months I’ve been hearing such things from Ukrainians who say, “well, Crimean
Tatars, Crimea is annexed, it’s a pity, but what can we do? It just turned out that way, we’re still weak,
Ukraine is still like this” – this is what some Ukrainians are telling themselves, it’s a kind of psychoanalysis
of this situation. The others say, “Well, what could have we done? Anyway, Crimea is a different territory”.
Ukrainians – some of them – are already ready to – they got used to the idea of Crimea being lost. And this
happens more and more day by day. Besides, there are regions in Ukraine that believe that the return to
Crimea will be even disadvantageous to them – you know what regions I’m talking about, I won’t name
them, they’ve become border regions now, and you understand what business processes are arising out of
this.
Who are we? If we’re a state, if society has demand for its statehood, Crimea, gentlemen, should be returned.
So I’m glad that I was one of those who made the blockade decision, that Ukraine as a state would join the
sanctions in the person of Crimean Tatar leaders, the sanctions, the international sanctions against Crimea.
I’m glad about that. I think that the headquarters Refat [Chubarov] has just mentioned that will be situated at
that address – it is 22 Sedovtsev Street, am I right, Refat? Yes, 22 Sedovtsev Street – I encourage all patriots
– Ukrainians or Crimean Tatars, it doesn’t matter – all those who care about the statehood of Ukraine, all
those who think that Ukraine should have its statehood, Ukraine will have none without Crimea. So I invite
all patriots to the headquarters at 22 Sedovtsev Street, and we’ll be planning this campaign in cooperation
with all patriots of Ukraine. Thank you very much.
Annex 1220
Annex 1221
BBC, “Ukraine crisis: Crimea in the dark in Russia power row”,
26 November 2015
BBC, “Ukraine crisis: Crimea in the dark in Russia power row”, video confirming the lack of urgent
measures of the Ukrainian authorities required to restore power supply to Crimea”, 26 November 2015,
available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34922789
Annex 1221
Annex 1222
School Academy of Bakhchisaray official website, “Visit to an
exhibition in the Khan’s Palace”, 10 October 2016
Annex 1223
“The wooden elements of the Mosque roofing”, photographic materials
from the archive of the State Budgetary Institution of the Republic of
Crimea “Bakhchisaray Historical, Cultural and Archaeological
Museum-Reserve”, December 2016
1
Translation
The wooden elements of the Mosque roofing, photographic materials from the archives of the State
Budgetary Institution of the Republic of Crimea “Bakhchisaray Historical, Cultural and
Archaeological Museum-Reserve”, December 2016
Photograph 1
Photograph 2
Annex 1223
2
Photograph 3
Photograph 4
Annex 1223
3
Photograph 5
Photograph 6
Annex 1223
Annex 1224
“Condition of the load-bearing part of the rafter system of the
northern roof pitch of the Mosque”, video materials from the archive
of the State Budgetary Institution of the Republic of Crimea
“Bakhchisaray Historical, Cultural and Archaeological Museum-
Reserve”, 9 February 2017
1
Translation
“Condition of the load-bearing part of the rafter system of the northern roof pitch of the
Mosque”, video materials from the archive of the State Budgetary Institution of the Republic
of Crimea “Bakhchisaray Historical, Cultural and Archaeological Museum-Reserve”,
9 February 2017:
1. Video “Main Beam”, archive of the State Budgetary Institution of the Republic of
Crimea “Bakhchisaray Historical, Cultural and Archaeological Museum-Reserve”, transcript,
9 February 2017:
“The central pole of the tent. It rests on two main beams. Now film closer so you can see the
condition of the load-bearing part of one of the beams. It is completely decayed. The load-bearing
part is rotten through. It does not work.”
2. Video “Filled Load-Bearing Parts of Roof Beams and Rafters”, archive of the State
Budgetary Institution of the Republic of Crimea “Bakhchisaray Historical, Cultural and
Archaeological Museum-Reserve”, transcript, 9 February 2017:
“During the restoration works in around 1968, the ends of the rafter system were filled with
rubber to the level of sheathing. As a result, the microclimate changed, there was no ventilation
altogether, and all load-bearing parts of the load-bearing rafters started to rot. Tellingly, all loadbearing
parts on the northern roof pitch are rotten through.”
Annex 1224
2
3. Video “Condition of the Load-Bearing Part of the Rafter System of the Northern Roof
Pitch”, archive of the State Budgetary Institution of the Republic of Crimea “Bakhchisaray Historical,
Cultural and Archaeological Museum-Reserve”, transcript, 9 February 2017:
“Corporation ATTA Group is performing emergency works on the northern roof pitch. In this
fragment, you can see load-bearing parts of the rafter systems that were opened. All the load-bearing
parts are subject to rot. Rafter plates on both sides were changed. The old rafters will be replaced
during restoration works. They are left here so far.”
4. Video “Coupling of the Eastern and Southern Roof Pitches”, archive of the State
Budgetary Institution of the Republic of Crimea “Bakhchisaray Historical, Cultural and
Archaeological Museum-Reserve”, transcript, 9 February 2017:
“You can see that this beam that couples the eastern and southern roof pitches is closed. The
central part of this [inaudible] is also supported by a distributing supporting strut so that this beam
will not collapse.”
Annex 1224
3
5. Video “Load-Bearing Parts of Rafters are Damaged by Fungi and Backfilled”, archive
of the State Budgetary Institution of the Republic of Crimea “Bakhchisaray Historical, Cultural and
Archaeological Museum-Reserve”, transcript, 9 February 2017:
“As there is no ventilation, all wooden structures are subject to fungoid disease. You can see
white mold on these robust beams and sheathing. It dries up in summer when it is warm and covers
extensively all wooden structures in winter.”
Annex 1224
Annex 1225
Video footage of the public event in the form of a demonstration
using automobiles in Bakhchisaray, 18 May 2017 as attached to
the Letter of the Acting Chair of the Bakhchisaray District Court
of the Republic of Crimea No. 2020-2/1265 of 20 May 2020
Translation
Excerpts
BAKHCHISARAY DISTRICT COURT
OF THE REPUBLIC OF CRIMEA
1 Kooperativnaya Street, Bakhchisaray. 298400
tel.: (36554) 4-26-91
fax.: (36554) 4-24-54
e-mail: [email protected]
20 May 2020 Ref. No. 2020-2/1265
To the Vice Chair of the Supreme Court
of the Republic of Crimea
T.A. Shklyar
In response to Ref. No. 07-01/2020 of 18 May 2020, the following copies of materials contained in
the case files of the Bakhchisaray District Court of the Republic of Crimea in Case No. 5-239/2017 initiated
against Server Dilyaverovich Umerov into an administrative offence under Part 5 of Article. 20.2 of the Code
on Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation are provided, including the video footage featuring
automobiles moving in a column […]
Acting Chair
of the Bakhchisaray District Court
of the Republic of Crimea
/Signed/ I.A. Yanin
Action by: M.V. Lomantseva
Tel.: […]
Annex 1225
Annex 1226
YouTube, “Day of Remembrance for the victims of the deportation
from Crimea. Sudak”, 18 May 2017
YouTube, “Day of Remembrance for the victims of the deportation from Crimea. Sudak”, 18 May 2017,
available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5mBJyUFxn0
Annex 1226
Annex 1227
5th Channel, “Time. Daily Round-up”, Interview with Mr Refat
Chubarov, 8 March 2018
Translation
5th Channel, “Time. Daily Round-up”, Interview with Mr Refat Chubarov,
8 March 2018
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ftyz--
I5pTk&ab channel=5%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%BB
Partial transcript of the video
20:39–21:32
“I think that this thesis that Crimea-related sanctions should be ramped up, they should be supplemented by
additional specific steps that Russia has to be ready to face even now, and it is not the rulers but the people
who, in various situations – including, for example, if they just do not think about it – they may face such
situations when they will not have a normal way out. In other words, all Russians should know that, if they
have any intentions or, God forbid, they have already done it and moved permanently to Russia-occupied
Crimea, they should know that they will have to leave. There can be simply no other way out. Otherwise, this
will amount to the recognition of the results of the occupation.”
Annex 1227
Annex 1228
Crimean Tatars Club website, “Crimean Tatars stand united on a
day of mourning”, 18 May 2018
Crimean Tatars Club website, “Crimean Tatars stand united on a day of mourning”, video of the
commemorative events dedicated to Sürgün in Aqmescit (Simferopol), 18 May 2018, available at:
https://www.crimeantatars.club/life/society/v-den-skorbi-krymskih-tatar-podderzhivaet-edinstvo
Annex 1228
Annex 1229
YouTube, Millet, “Reconstruction of the Mosque of the
Khan’s Palace in Bakhchisaray (Crimea)”,
14 September 2018
Translation
YouTube, Millet, “Reconstruction of the Mosque of the Khan’s Palace in Bakhchisaray (Crimea)”,
14 September 2018, available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7j66xx K4Pg
Partial transcript of the video
[…]
0:00 – 0:10: The Big Khan Mosque in Bakhchisaray is open for visitors. For now, it is allowed to
perform only the Friday Namaz here, as only the first stage of the restoration has been finished.
[…]
0:51 – 1:05: This is the most ancient mosque. It should be exemplary and the most beautiful. I am
happy that restoration works are being conducted here. Great attention should be paid to this mosque,
it should be made the best one and shown to whole Crimea.
[…]
1:23 – 1:32: I am happy with the work conducted; everything has been done well and competently. I
thank Allah and everyone who took part in this undertaking.
[…]
Annex 1229
Annex 1230
YouTube, “Memory of Noman Ḉelebicihan has been honored in
Sevastopol”, 23 February 2019
YouTube, “Memory of Noman Ḉelebicihan has been honored in Sevastopol” that shows the ceremony of
laying flowers at the memorial plaques of Mr Ḉelebicihan in Sevastopol and the concert, 23 February 2019,
available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbKmhmQYl6s
Annex 1230
Annex 1231
Collegium School of Alushta, Ethnographic museum
“Bereginya”, 2021
1
Translation
Municipal General Education Institution “Collegium School” of Alushta
Ethnographic museum “Bereginya”
Annex 1231
2
Annex 1231
3
Annex 1231
4
Annex 1231
5
Annex 1231
6
Annex 1231
7
Annex 1231
8
Annex 1231
9
Annex 1231
10
Annex 1231
11
Annex 1231
12
Annex 1231
13
Annex 1231
Annex 1232
Fevzi Yakubov Crimean Engineering and Pedagogical University,
Photographs of the display of the Museum of Ukrainian Ethnic Studies,
2021
Museum of Ukrainian Ethnic Studies within the State Budgetary Educational
Institution of Higher Education of the Republic of Crimea “Fevzi Yakubov
Crimean Engineering and Pedagogical University”
1
[Sign on a door in Ukrainian: “Class No. 172 of the Ukrainian language and literature”]
Translation
Annex 1232
2
Ann ex 1232
3
Ann ex 1232
4
Ann ex 1232
5
Ann ex 1232
6
Ann ex 1232
7
Ann ex 1232
8
Ann ex 1232
9
Ann ex 1232
10
Ann ex 1232
11
Ann ex 1232
12
Ann ex 1232
13
Ann ex 1232
14
Ann ex 1232
15
Ann ex 1232
16
Ann ex 1232
17
Ann ex 1232
18
Ann ex 1232
19
Ann ex 1232
20
Annex 1232
Annex 1233
Yalta Secondary School No. 15, Photographs from cultural
events held at school between 2014 and 2021
Performance of students at the 5th anniversary of the reunification of Crimea with Russia
Photographs from cultural events held at the Municipal budgetary general educational institution
“Yalta Secondary School No. 15” of the municipality of the urban district Yalta
between 2014 and 2021
Performance of a student at the 5th anniversary of the reunification of Crimea with Russia
1
Translation
Annex 1233
Performance of a student at the 5th anniversary of the reunification of Crimea with Russia
2
Annex 1233
Anniversary of Lesya Ukrainka, 2018
Anniversary of T.G. Shevchenko, 2019
3
Annex 1233
The Day for Tolerance, 2018
The Day for Tolerance, 2020
4
Annex 1233
The Day for Tolerance
Anniversary of T.G. Shevchenko, 2016
5
Annex 1233
Contest for design work
Legends of Crimea
6
Annex 1233
National holiday Maslenitsa, 2019
National holiday Maslenitsa, 2019
7
Annex 1233
Festival of national doll (Russian national costume)
Festival of national doll (Ukrainian national costume)
8
Annex 1233
Folklore festival
Holiday Concert
9
Annex 1233
Christmas carols, 2018
A play based on a Ukrainian folk tale, 2019
10
Annex 1233
An English lesson about the nationalities of Crimea
Participation in the city's Legends of the Crimea event
11
Annex 1233
Participation in the city's Legends of the Crimea event
12
Annex 1233
Annex 1234
Types of migration statuses acquired by Crimean residents as a
result of Crimea’s accession to the Russian Federation
Annex 1235
Diplomas of Kiramet LLC
1
Translation
(Logo)
UNION OF ARCHITECTS OF THE REPUBLIC OF CRIMEA
REVIEW CONTEST OF THE BEST WORKS OF CRIMEA
GOLDEN DIPLOMA
in the nomination
PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND COMPLEXES
Museum complex “Scythian Neapolis”
Simferopol
KIRAMET LLC. Authors: Tkachuk A.A., Kalinovskaya Ya.B., Kostinsky M.V.
/Seal: UNION OF ARCHITECTS OF THE REPUBLIC OF CRIMEA * the Republic of Crimea *
Simferopol/
Chairman of the Jury /Signature/ Mityunin A.R.
Annex 1235
2
National Association of Surveyors and Designers
NOPRIZ
PROFESSIONAL CONTEST FOR THE BEST INNOVATIVE PROJECT
DIPLOMA
2nd place in the nomination
BEST CONCEPT OF AN UNREALIZED PROJECT
Museum complex “Scythian Neapolis”
Archeologicheskaya St., 1, Simferopol, the Republic of Crimea,
Presented by
KIRAMET LLC
The project is included in the NOPRIZ catalog
Chairman of the Contest Commission,
President of the National Association of
Surveyors and Designers, People's Architect of Russia,
Academician /Signature/ M.M. Posokhin
2016
Annex 1235
3
archnasledie.ru
II ALL-RUSSIAN FESTIVAL WITH INTERNATIONAL PARTICIPATION
ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE
BRONZE DIPLOMA
REVIEW CONTEST “THE BEST SITE OF PRESERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT”
SECTION IMPLEMENTATION
NOMINATION OBJECTS OF CIVIL ARCHITECTURE
IS AWARDED TO KIRAMET LLC
AUTHOR'S TEAM: SERGEEVA O.I., LITOVCHENKO P.A., KALINOVSKAYA YA.B., GORBACH A.
S., KUROCHKIN V.G.
PROJECT NAME: RESTORATION OF A REGIONAL CULTURAL HERITAGE SITE “KENESA”
(1891-1896) AT THE ADDRESS: Karaimskaya St., 6, letter A, Simferopol, the Republic of Crimea
THE REPUBLIC OF CRIMEA, SIMFEROPOL
22-26 MAY 2019 KAZAN KREMLIN
KAZAN
/Signature/ President of the Union of Architects of Russia N.I. Shumakov
/Signature/ Mayor of Kazan I.R. Metshin
Annex 1235
4
UNION OF ARCHITECTS OF THE REPUBLIC OF CRIMEA
REVIEW CONTEST OF THE BEST WORKS OF CRIMEA
GOLDEN DIPLOMA
Section Buildings
Nomination Restoration and Reconstruction
RESTORATION OF A REGIONAL CULTURAL HERITAGE SITE “KENESA”
(1891-1896)
KIRAMET LLC; Chief Project Architect Tkachuk A.A., Chief Project Engineer: Litovchenko P. A.,
architects: Kalinovskaya Ya.B., Gorbach A. S., engineer: Kurochkin V.G. Contractor: Corporation
ATTA Group LLC, N.V. Kryakvina
Chairman of the Jury /Signature/ Kravchenko V.G.
/Seal: UNION OF ARCHITECTS OF THE REPUBLIC OF CRIMEA * the Republic of Crimea *
Simferopol/
Annex 1235
5
NOPRIZ
National Association of Surveyors and Designers
INTERNATIONAL PROFESSIONAL CONTEST FOR THE BEST PROJECT
•2019•
1st GRADE DIPLOMA
IN THE NOMINATION “THE BEST RESTORATION (RECONSTRUCTION) PROJECT OF A
CULTURAL HERITAGE SITE”
Preservation of the cultural heritage site of regional significance “Kenassa” (1891-1896) (Karaimskaya St.,
6, letter A, Simferopol, the Republic of Crimea)
Presented by
KIRAMET LLC
The project is included in the NOPRIZ catalog
Chairman of the contest commission,
President of the National Association of Surveyors and Designers, People's Architect of Russia, Academician
M.M. Posokhin
/Signature/
Annex 1235
6
UNION OF ARCHITECTS OF THE REPUBLIC OF CRIMEA
Regional branch of the all-Russian non-governmental organization ‘Union of Architects of Russia’
2017-2019 REVIEW CONTEST
“ARCHITECTURAL WORKS OF CRIMEA”
GOLDEN DIPLOMA
IN THE NOMINATION RESTORATION AND RECONSTRUCTION
“Restoration of Khan's Palace” (XVI-XIX centuries): Dilara Bikec Dürbe Tomb (1764), Northern Dürbe
Tomb (XVI century), Southern Dürbe Tomb (XVII century), at address – Rechnaya St., 133, Bakhchisaray,
the Republic of Crimea
KIRAMET LLC
Chairman of the Jury /Signature/ Shumakov N.I.
/Seal: UNION OF ARCHITECTS OF THE REPUBLIC OF CRIMEA * the Republic of Crimea *
Simferopol/
Annex 1235
7
archnasledie.ru
Union of architects of Russia
Union of Architects of Saint-Petersburg
III ALL-RUSSIAN FESTIVAL
ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE
DIPLOMA
OF UNION OF ARCHITECTS OF RUSSIA
REVIEW CONTEST “THE BEST SITE OF PRESERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT”
SECTION Project
NOMINATION architectural heritage sites. Architectural monuments, ensembles, complexes
IS AWARDED TO KIRAMET LLC
AUTHOR'S TEAM: O.I. SERGEEVA, A.V. TOKAREV, P.A. LITOVCHENKO, S.P. LITOVCHENKO,
P.I. GOLOVKO, V.G. KUROCHKIN, M.N. BAKHUTA, D.A. KOGTINA, Ya.B. KALINOVSKAYA, A.S.
GORBACH, V.Yu. DERBENEV, V.A. KOLESNIKOVA, O.I. FISINA
Project name: Restoration of “Khan's Palace” ensemble sites: “Northern Dürbe Tomb”, “Southern Dürbe
Tomb”, “Dilara Bikec Dürbe Tomb”
17-19 SEPTEMBER 2020
St. Petersburg
/Signature/ President of the Union of Architects of Russia N. I. Shumakov
/Signature/ President of the Union of Architects of St. Petersburg O.S. Romanov
Annex 1235
8
NOPRIZ
National Association of Surveyors and Designers
2nd GRADE DIPLOMA
IN THE NOMINATION “THE BEST RESTORATION (RECONSTRUCTION) PROJECT OF A
CULTURAL HERITAGE SITE”
Project documentation for the preservation of the cultural heritage site of federal significance Sary Guzel
Bath”, 1533 (Rechnaya str., 133, Bakhchisaray, Republic of Crimea)
Presented by
KIRAMET LLC
The project is included in the NOPRIZ catalog
Chairman of the Contest Commission,
President of the National Association of Surveyors and Designers,
People's Architect of Russia, Academician M. M. Posokhin
(Signed)
Annex 1235
9
archnasledie.ru
II ALL-RUSSIAN FESTIVAL WITH INTERNATIONAL PARTICIPATION
ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE
SILVER DIPLOMA
REVIEW CONTEST “THE BEST SITE OF PRESERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT”
SECTION RESTORATION PROJECTS
NOMINATION CIVIL ARCHITECTURE SITES
IS AWARDED TO KIRAMET LLC
AUTHOR'S TEAM: SERGEEVA O.I., LITOVCHENKO P.A., LITOVCHENKO P.A., LITOVCHENKO
S.P., KALINOVSKAYA Ya.B., GORBACH A.S., KUROCHKIN V.G., TKACHUK A.A.
Project name: RESTORATION OF THE FORTRESS AND THE CAVE CITY OF “CHUFUT KALE” (VXV
CENTURIES), KARAITE KENESAS (LARGE AND SMALL) OF THE XIV, XVIII CENTURIES
AT THE ADDRESS: BASENKO ST, 57, BAKHCHISARAI, REPUBLIC OF CRIMEA
22-26 MAY 2019
KAZAN KREMLIN
KAZAN
/Signature/ President of the Union of Architects of Russia N. I. Shumakov
/Signature/ Mayor of Kazan I. R. Metshin
Annex 1235
10
UNION OF ARCHITECTS OF THE REPUBLIC OF CRIMEA
Regional branch of the all-Russian non-governmental organization ”Union of Architects of Russia”
2017-2019 REVIEW CONTEST
“ARCHITECTURAL WORKS OF CRIMEA”
SILVER DIPLOMA
in the nomination RESTORATION AND RECONSTRUCTION
“Restoration of the Fortress and the cave city “Chufut Kale” (V-XV centuries), Karaite Kenesas (Big and
Large) of the XIV, XVIII centuries at the address: Basenko st. 57,
Bakhchisaray, Republic of Crimea"
Authors: KIRAMET LLC
Chairman of the Jury (signed) Shumakov N.I.
/Seal: UNION OF ARCHITECTS OF THE REPUBLIC OF CRIMEA * Republic of Crimea * Simferopol/
Annex 1235
3
100 years of the Bakhchisaray Museum
LETTER OF APPRECIATION TO
I would like express my sincere gratitude to you personally and to the employees of for
their assistance in the preservation of cultural heritage sites under supervision of the Bakhchisaray Museum-
Reserve. Your professionalism, competence, responsibility, and ability to team-work deserve sincere respect.
I wish you success, prosperity and all the best.
General Director of the State Budgetary
Institution of the Republic of Crimea Bakhchisaray
Historical-Cultural and Archeological Museum-Reserve /Signature/ Martynyuk V.L.
/Seal: Bakhchisaray historical-cultural and archeological Museum-Reserve * OGRN Illegible/
Annex 1236
5
CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATION
Self-regulatory organization
Association “Alliance of Urban Planning and Design”
AWARDS
or the work achievements and in connection with
the professional holiday Builder's Day.
President /Signature/ A.S. Shamuzafarov
/Seal: Alliance of Urban Planning and Design * Association * OGRN (Main State Registration Number)
1087799040229 * Moscow/
Annex 1236
Annex 1237
Website “Mirotvorets”, page dedicated to
29 April 2018
Annex 1238
List of federal cultural heritage sites belonging to the Crimean Tatar
culture and registered in the unified state register of cultural heritage
sites (historical and cultural monuments) of the peoples of the
Russian Federation
1
Translation
Prepared based on the information from the unified state register of cultural heritage sites (historical and
cultural monuments) of the peoples of the Russian Federation, available in Russian at:
https://opendata.mkrf.ru/opendata/7705851331-egrkn.
List of federal cultural heritage sites belonging to the Crimean Tatar culture and registered in the unified
state register of cultural heritage sites (historical and cultural monuments) of the peoples of the Russian
Federation includes:
Item
No.
Name of the
federal cultural
heritage site
Location of the federal
cultural heritage site
Number and date of the resolution of the state
authority on inclusion of the site in the register
Order of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian
Federation
Registration number in the register
1 Dervish lodge “A”, “B”, “b”, “V” 18
Karayev St.,
Evpatoriya, the
Republic of Crimea
Resolution of the Government of the Russian
Federation of 17.10.2015 No.2073-r
Order of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian
Federation
of 04.12.2015 No.24605-r
911520358920006
2 Juma-Jami
Mosque
36/1/3 “B” Revolyutsii
St., Evpatoriya, the
Republic of Crimea
Resolution of the Government of the Russian
Federation of 17.10.2015 No. 2073-r
Order of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian
Federation
of 04.12.2015 No. 25087-r
911510358930036
3 Mosque 1 Karaimskaya St.,/6
Lenin St.,
Feodosiya, the
Republic of Crimea
Resolution of the Government of the Russian
Federation of 17.10.2015 No. 2073-r
Order of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian
Federation
of 27.11.2015 No. 23205-r
911510360650006
4 Zincirli
Madrasa School
57A Basenko St.,
Bakhchisaray, the
Republic of Crimea
Resolution of the Government of the Russian
Federation of 17.10.2015 No. 2073-r
Order of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian
Federation
of 27.11.2015 No.23676-r
911510357750006
5 Haci Geray
Dürbesi Tomb
57 “O” Basenko St.,
Bakhchisaray, the
Republic of Crimea
Resolution of the Government of the Russian
Federation of 17.10.2015 No.2073-r
Order of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian
Federation
of 04.12.2015 No.24586-r
911510357670006
6 Cubiform Dürbe
Tomb
16-a “A” Budyonniy
St.,
Bakhchisaray, the
Republic of Crimea
Resolution of the Government of the Russian
Federation of 17.10.2015 No.2073-r
Order of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian
Federation
of 04.12.2015 No.24381-r
911510357920006
7 Mimbar Budyonniy St.,
Bakhchisaray, the
Republic of Crimea
Resolution of the Government of the Russian
Federation of 17.10.2015 No.2073-r
Order of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian
Federation
of 27.11.2015 No.21402-r
Annex 1238
2
911510359750006
8 Eski Dürbe
Tomb
12-a “A” Zoya
Kosmodemyanskaya
St.,
Bakhchisaray, the
Republic of Crimea
Resolution of the Government of the Russian
Federation of 17.10.2015 No.2073-r
Order of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian
Federation
of 04.12.2015 No.25609-r
911510357640006
9 Tahtali-Jami
Mosque
7 Gasprinsky St.,
Bakhchisaray, the
Republic of Crimea
Resolution of the Government of the Russian
Federation
of 17.10.2015 No.2073-r
Order of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian
Federation
of 27.11.2015 No.22020-r
911510357730006
10 Large Octagon
Dürbe Tomb
9-a “A” Budyonniy St.,
Bakhchisaray, the
Republic of Crimea
Resolution of the Government of the Russian
Federation of 17.10.2015 No.2073-r
Order of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian
Federation
of 12.12.2017 No.133944-r
911711273820006
11 Small Octagon
Dürbe Tomb
1-a “A” Pervomaiskiy
Lane,
Bakhchisaray, the
Republic of Crimea
Resolution of the Government of the Russian
Federation of 17.10.2015 No.2073-r
Order of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian
Federation
of 04.12.2015 No.25990r
911510358000006
12 Khan’s Palace,
XVI-XIX
centuries
133 Rechnaya St.,
Bakhchisaray, the
Republic of Crimea
Resolution of the Government of the Russian
Federation of 17.10.2015 No.2073-r
Order of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian
Federation
of 27.11.2015 No.20380-r
911520357970006
13 Main Building 133 “D”, “E”, “Z”,
“Zh”, “I” Rechnaya St.,
Bakhchisaray, the
Republic of Crimea
Resolution of the Government of the Russian
Federation of 17.10.2015 No.2073-r
Order of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian
Federation
of 27.11.2015 No.21173-r
911510357970156
14 Harem 133 “K” Rechnaya St.,
Bakhchisaray, the
Republic of Crimea
Resolution of the Government of the Russian
Federation of 17.10.2015 No.2073-r
Order of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian
Federation
of 04.12.2015 No.24147-r
911510357970106
15 Earl’s (Secular)
Building
133 “A”, “B”
Rechnaya St.,
Bakhchisaray, the
Republic of Crimea
Resolution of the Government of the Russian
Federation of 17.10.2015 No.2073-r
Order of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian
Federation
of 04.12.2015 No.25305-r
911510357970146
16 Khan's Kitchen 133 “V”, “G”
Rechnaya St.,
Bakhchisaray, the
Republic of Crimea
Resolution of the Government of the Russian
Federation of 17.10.2015 No.2073-r
Order of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian
Federation
of 27.11.2015 No.23541-r
911510357970046
Annex 1238
3
17 Stable Building 133 “O”, “P”, “R”, “C”
Rechnaya St.,
Bakhchisaray, the
Republic of Crimea
Resolution of the Government of the Russian
Federation of 17.10.2015 No.2073-r
Order of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian
Federation
of 04.12.2015 No.24912-r
911510357970136
18 Library
Building
133 “N” Rechnaya St.,
Bakhchisaray, the
Republic of Crimea
Resolution of the Government of the Russian
Federation of 17.10.2015 No.2073-r
Order of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian
Federation
of 04.12.2015 No.24071-r
911510357970096
19 Falcon Tower 133 “L” Rechnaya St.,
Bakhchisaray, the
Republic of Crimea
Resolution of the Government of the Russian
Federation of 17.10.2015 No. 2073-r
Order of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian
Federation
of 27.11.2015 №22255-r
911510357970026
20 Khan Mosque 133 “Sh” Rechnaya St.,
Bakhchisaray, the
Republic of Crimea
Resolution of the Government of the Russian
Federation of 17.10.2015 No.2073-r
Order of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian
Federation
of 27.11.2015 No.21170-r
911510357970016
21 Dilara Bikec
Dürbe Tomb
133 “M” Rechnaya St.,
Bakhchisaray, the
Republic of Crimea
Resolution of the Government of the Russian
Federation of 17.10.2015 No.2073-r
Order of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian
Federation
of 27.11.2015 No.24014-r
911510357970076
22 Sary Guzel Bath 133 “F” Rechnaya St.,
Bakhchisaray, the
Republic of Crimea
Resolution of the Government of the Russian
Federation of 17.10.2015 No.2073-r
Order of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian
Federation
of 04.12.2015 No.26108-r
911510357970086
23 Northern Dürbe
Tomb
133 “U” Rechnaya St.,
Bakhchisaray, the
Republic of Crimea
Resolution of the Government of the Russian
Federation of 17.10.2015 No.2073-r
Order of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian
Federation
of 04.12.2015 No.25138-r
911510357970126
24 Southern Dürbe
Tomb
133 “T” Rechnaya St.,
Bakhchisaray, the
Republic of Crimea
Resolution of the Government of the Russian
Federation of 17.10.2015 No.2073-r
Order of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian
Federation
of 04.12.2015 No.25291-r
911510357970066
25 Grave Rotunda 133 Rechnaya St.,
Bakhchisaray, the
Republic of Crimea
Resolution of the Government of the Russian
Federation of 17.10.2015 No.2073-r
Order of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian
Federation
of 27.11.2015 No.21161-r
911510357970036
Annex 1238
4
26 Three-Bridge
Embankment
133 Rechnaya St.,
Bakhchisaray, the
Republic of Crimea
Resolution of the Government of the Russian
Federation of 17.10.2015 No.2073-r
Order of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian
Federation
of 04.12.2015 No.25681-r
911510357970116
27 Gardens and
Park Sites
133 Rechnaya St.,
Bakhchisaray, the
Republic of Crimea
Resolution of the Government of the Russian
Federation of 17.10.2015 No.2073-r
Order of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian
Federation
of 04.12.2015 No.25719-r
911520357970166
28 Old Dürbe
Tomb
10-a “A” Frunze St.,
Bakhchisaray, the
Republic of Crimea
Resolution of the Government of the Russian
Federation of 17.10.2015 No.2073-r
Order of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian
Federation
of 27.11.2015 №23394-r
911510359810006
29 Caravan-saraiy Lunacharskiy St.,
Belogorsk, the
Republic of Crimea
Resolution of the Government of the Russian
Federation of 17.10.2015 No.2073-r
Order of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian
Federation
of 04.12.2015 No.24939-r
911510359860006
30 Mosque and
Madrasa
5 Chapayev Lane,
Staryi Krym, the
Republic of Crimea
Resolution of the Government of the Russian
Federation of 17.10.2015 No.2073-r
Order of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian
Federation
of 04.12.2015 No.25344-r
911520363380006
31 Mosque (ruins) 2 “A” Eski-Jami St.,
Dobrovskoye Village
Settlement,
Pionerskoye Village,
Simferopol District,
the Republic of Crimea
Resolution of the Government of the Russian
Federation of 17.10.2015 No.2073-r
Order of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian
Federation
of 04.12.2015 No.24900-r
911510362980006
Annex 1238
5
List of regional cultural heritage sites belonging to the Crimean Tatar culture and registered in
the unified state register of cultural heritage sites (historical and cultural monuments) of the peoples of
the Russian Federation includes:
Item
No.
Name of the regional
cultural heritage site
Location of the regional
cultural heritage site
Number and date of the resolution
of the state authority on inclusion of
the site in the register
Order of the Ministry of Culture of
the Russian Federation
Registration number in the register
1 Yukhary-Jami
Mosque, mid-XIX
century
5 “A” Verkhnyaya St.,
Alushta, the Republic of
Crimea
Regulation of the Council of
Ministers of the Republic of Crimea
of 20.12.2016 No.627
Order of the Ministry of Culture of
the Russian Federation
of 11.08.2017 No.100391-r
911710955520005
2 Haji Ramazan
Nebiev Fountain,
late XIX century
Between buildings No. 30
and No. 34, Karl Marx St.,
Alushta, the Republic of
Crimea
Regulation of the Council of
Ministers of the Republic of Crimea
of 20.12.2016 No.627
Order of the Ministry of Culture of
the Russian Federation
of 11.08.2017 No.99064-r
911710955510005
3 Minaret,
late XVIII century
Krutoy Lane,
Partenit Urban-type
Settlement, the
Republic of Crimea
Regulation of the Council of
Ministers of the Republic of Crimea
of 20.12.2016 No.627
Order of the Ministry of Culture of
the Russian Federation
of 11.08.2017 №100715-r
911710955570005
4 Mosque,
XIX century
Peshekhodnaya St.,
Maly Mayak Village, the
Republic of Crimea
Regulation of the Council of
Ministers of the Republic of Crimea
of 20.12.2016 No.627
Order of the Ministry of Culture of
the Russian Federation
of 11.08.2017 No.100148-r
911710955670005
5 Juma-Jami Mosque,
early ХХ century
8 “A” Pushkin St.,
Kerch, the
Republic of Crimea
Regulation of the Council of
Ministers of the Republic of Crimea
of 20.12.2016 No.627
Order of the Ministry of Culture of
the Russian Federation
of 11.08.2017 No.99104-r
911710946600005
6 Seit-Nafe Mosque,
XIX century
3 “A” Kolodezniy Lane,
Simferopol, the
Republic of Crimea
Regulation of the Council of
Ministers of the Republic of Crimea
of 20.12.2016 No.627
Order of the Ministry of Culture of
the Russian Federation
of 19.09.2017 No.107347-r
911710988670005
7 Kebir-Jami Mosque,
XVI-XX centuries
4 Kurchatov St./ 3 “A”
Volodarsky St.,
Simferopol, the
Republic of Crimea
Regulation of the Council of
Ministers of the Republic of Crimea
of 20.12.2016 No.627
Order of the Ministry of Culture of
Annex 1238
6
the Russian Federation
of 18.09.2017 No.105088-r
911710988690005
8 Madrasa,
XIX century
8 “B” Samokish St.,
Simferopol, the Republic of
Crimea
Regulation of the Council of
Ministers of the Republic of Crimea
of 20.12.2016 No.627
Order of the Ministry of Culture of
the Russian Federation
of 19.09.2017 No.106409-r
911710989390005
9 Monument to Ismail
Gasprinsky,
1998
Salgir Embankment,
Vorovskiy St.,
Simferopol, the Republic of
Crimea
Regulation of the Council of
Ministers of the Republic of Crimea
of 20.12.2016 No.627
Order of the Ministry of Culture of
the Russian Federation
of 13.04.2017 No.84407-r
911710883860005
10 Aji Bay Mosque,
XVIII century
Gornaya St.,
Dachnoye Village, Sudak,
the Republic of Crimea
Regulation of the Council of
Ministers of the Republic of Crimea
of 20.12.2016 No.627
Order of the Ministry of Culture of
the Russian Federation
of 11.08.2017 No.99510-r
911710937360005
11 Bust of twice hero of
the Soviet Union
Amet-Khan Sultan,
1955
Alupka,
Yalta Township, the
Republic of Crimea
Regulation of the Council of
Ministers of the Republic of Crimea
of 20.12.2016 No.627
Order of the Ministry of Culture of
the Russian Federation
of 14.04.2017 No.87251-r
911710901010005
12 Caravan-saraiy 1910 44 Sevastopol Highway,
Koreiz Urban-type
Settlement,
Yalta Township, the
Republic of Crimea
Regulation of the Council of
Ministers of the Republic of Crimea
of 20.12.2016 No.627
Order of the Ministry of Culture of
the Russian Federation
of 18.09.2017 No.104897-r
911711012660005
13 Burma Cheshme
Fountain,
1748
3 Kommunarov St.,
Bakhchisaray, the Republic
of Crimea
Regulation of the Council of
Ministers of the Republic of Crimea
of 20.12.2016 No.627
Order of the Ministry of Culture of
the Russian Federation
of 26.04.2017 No.87793-r
911710919840005
14 Asma Koyu
Fountain,
XIX century
35 Krasnoflotskaya St.,
Bakhchisaray, the Republic
of Crimea
Regulation of the Council of
Ministers of the Republic of Crimea
of 20.12.2016 No.627
Order of the Ministry of Culture of
the Russian Federation
of 28.04.2017 No.90513-r
911710919860005
15 Iskudar Kahvehane,
late XVIII century
81 Lenin St., Regulation of the Council of
Ministers of the Republic of Crimea
Annex 1238
7
Bakhchisaray, the Republic
of Crimea
of 20.12.2016 No.627
Order of the Ministry of Culture of
the Russian Federation
of 26.04.2017 No.88760-r
911710920000005
16 Building of the
printing-house and
editorial office of
Terjiman newspaper
where Ismail
Gasprisky used to
work,
late XIX –
early XX centuries
47-a Gasprinsky St.,
Bakhchisaray, the
Republic of Crimea
Regulation of the Council of
Ministers of the Republic of Crimea
of 20.12.2016 No.627
Order of the Ministry of Culture of
the Russian Federation
of 28.04.2017 No.90716-r
911710919820005
17 Court cemetery,
XVI-XVIII centuries
113 Rechnaya St.,
Bakhchisaray, the
Republic of Crimea
Regulation of the Council of
Ministers of the Republic of Crimea
of 20.12.2016 No.627
Order of the Ministry of Culture of
the Russian Federation
of 28.04.2017 No.90092-r
911720919910005
18 Molla-Mustafa
Mosque,
XVIII century
41-a Sevastopolskaya St.,
Bakhchisaray
Regulation of the Council of
Ministers of the Republic of Crimea
of 20.12.2016 No.627
Order of the Ministry of Culture of
the Russian Federation
of 28.04.2017 No.89846-r
911710919900005
19 Ismi-Khan Mosque,
XVII – XVIII
centuries
80 Sevastopolskaya St.,
Bakhchisaray, the
Republic of Crimea
Regulation of the Council of
Ministers of the Republic of Crimea
of 20.12.2016 No.627
Order of the Ministry of Culture of
the Russian Federation
of 28.04.2017 No.89516-r
911710919930005
20 Monument to Ismail
Gasprinsky,
2004
Near 4 Lenin St.,
Bakhchisaray, the
Republic of Crimea
Regulation of the Council of
Ministers of the Republic of Crimea
of 20.12.2016 No.627
Order of the Ministry of Culture of
the Russian Federation
of 11.08.2017 No.96176-r
911710945250005
21 Yusupov Mosque,
early XX century
37 Lenin St.,
Sokolinoye Village,
Golubinskoye Village
Settlement,
Bakhchisaray District, the
Republic of Crimea
Regulation of the Council of
Ministers of the Republic of Crimea
of 20.12.2016 No.627
Order of the Ministry of Culture of
the Russian Federation
of 11.08.2017 No.96328-r
911710956290005
22 Kutler Mosque,
XIX century
46-a Titov St.,
Sokolinoye Village,
Regulation of the Council of
Ministers of the Republic of Crimea
of 20.12.2016 No.627
Annex 1238
8
Golubinskoye Village
Settlement,
Bakhchisaray District, the
Republic of Crimea
Order of the Ministry of Culture of
the Russian Federation
of т 11.08.2017 No.94672-r
911710956310005
23 Ali-Bay Bulgakov
Mosque,
XVIII century
30-a Frunze St.,
Sokolinoye Village,
Golubinskoye Village
Settlement,
Bakhchisaray District, the
Republic of Crimea
Regulation of the Council of
Ministers of the Republic of Crimea
of 20.12.2016 No.627
Order of the Ministry of Culture of
the Russian Federation
of 11.08.2017 No.98697-r
911710945810005
24 Fountain,
late XVIII century –
early XIX century
Krasnomakskoye Village
Settlement, 6 km south-west
of Novoulyanovka Village,
at the place of former Adym-
Chokrak (Istoki) Village, 4
km south-east of Hoji-Sala
Village, Bakhchisaray
District, the Republic of
Crimea
Regulation of the Council of
Ministers of the Republic of Crimea
of 20.12.2016 No.627
Order of the Ministry of Culture of
the Russian Federation
of 11.08.2017 No.98048-r
911710946000005
25 Dürbe,
XVII-XVIII
centuries
Aivovoye Village,
Tenistovskoye Village
Settlement, Bakhchisaray
District, the Republic of
Crimea
Regulation of the Council of
Ministers of the Republic of Crimea
of 20.12.2016 No.627
Order of the Ministry of Culture of
the Russian Federation
of 11.08.2017 №99860-r
911710946450005
26 Memorial sign to
partisan Seydali
Kurtseitov,
1944, 1975
Kolan-Bair mountain area,
0.15 km east of 884.0 height
(Glory Mound), Belogorsk
District, the Republic of
Crimea
Regulation of the Council of
Ministers of the Republic of Crimea
of 20.12.2016 No.627
Order of the Ministry of Culture of
the Russian Federation
of 26.04.2017 No.88243-r
911710919520005
27 Beybars Mosque
(ruins),
late XIII century
59 Krasnoarmeyskaya St.,
Staryi Krym, the Republic of
Crimea
Regulation of the Council of
Ministers of the Republic of Crimea
of 20.12.2016 No.627
Order of the Ministry of Culture of
the Russian Federation
of 11.08.2017 No.95420-r
911710951130005
28 Kurshun-Jami
Mosque
(ruins),
XIV century
18 Lenin St./ 40 Stamov St.,
Staryi Krym,
Kirovsky District, the
Republic of Crimea
Regulation of the Council of
Ministers of the Republic of Crimea
of 20.12.2016 No.627
Order of the Ministry of Culture of
the Russian Federation
of 11.08.2017 No.100596-r
911710951140005
29 Caravan-saraiy
(ruins),
XIII – XIV centuries
40 Partizanskaya St.,
Staryi Krym,
Regulation of the Council of
Ministers of the Republic of Crimea
of 20.12.2016 No.627
Order of the Ministry of Culture of
Annex 1238
9
Kirovsky District, the
Republic of Crimea
the Russian Federation
of 11.08.2017 No.97220-r
911710951220005
30 Myusk-Jami Mosque
(ruins),
XV century
18 Sadovaya St.,
Staryi Krym, the Republic of
Crimea
Regulation of the Council of
Ministers of the Republic of Crimea
of 20.12.2016 No.627
Order of the Ministry of Culture of
the Russian Federation
of 11.08.2017 No.96607-r
911710951230005
Annex 1238
11
Yalta, the Republic of
Crimea
Order of the Ministry of Culture of
the Russian Federation
of 13.04.2017 No.86303-r
911710906400005
8 Memorial sign
dedicated to Lesya
Ukrainka,
1971
4th km of detour road,
Yalta, the Republic of
Crimea
Regulation of the Council of
Ministers of the Republic of Crimea
of 20.12.2016 No.627
Order of the Ministry of Culture of
the Russian Federation
of 13.04.2017 No.86539-r
911710906480005
9 Tomb of the
Ukrainian poet E.M.
Gregoruk,
1922
Cemetery,
Polikurovskaya St.,
Yalta, the Republic of
Crimea
Regulation of the Council of
Ministers of the Republic of Crimea
of 20.12.2016 No.627
Order of the Ministry of Culture of
the Russian Federation
of 13.04.2017 No.85854-r
911710906460005
10 Tomb of Ukrainian
poet S.V. Rudansky,
1873
Cemetery,
Polikurovskaya St.,
Yalta, the Republic of
Crimea
Regulation of the Council of
Ministers of the Republic of Crimea
of 20.12.2016 No.627
Order of the Ministry of Culture of
the Russian Federation
of 13.04.2017 No.84701-r
911710906570005
11 Monument to T.G.
Shevchenko,
2007
T.G. Shevchenko Garden
Square, Yalta, the Republic
of Crimea
Regulation of the Council of
Ministers of the Republic of Crimea
of 20.12.2016 No.627
Order of the Ministry of Culture of
the Russian Federation
of 13.04.2017 No.85077-r
911710906980005
Annex 1238
Annex 1239
Restoration assignment for development of research and design
documents for the restoration of the architectural monument of the 16th
– 18th centuries: the Great Khan Mosque, approved by the Head of the
State Service for Cultural Heritage Protection of Ukraine,
М.М. Kucheruk, 2003 (excerpts)
Translation
Excerpts
Translated from Ukrainian
Approved by
The Head of the State
Service for Cultural
Heritage Protection of
Ukraine
/Signature/
M.M. Kucheruk
2003
L.S.
/Seal: Coat of Arms of
Ukraine * State Service
for the Cultural Heritage
Protection *
Identification code
2629605 *
The Ministry of Culture
and Arts of Ukraine * City
of Kiev/
RESTORATION ASSIGNMENT
for development of research and design documents
1. Project name: Architectural monument of the XVI-XVIII centuries. The Great Khan Mosque.
[…]
8. Characteristics and technical condition of the project: The roofing of the mosque is in an
emergency state. The wooden suspended ceiling over the Khan’s Lodge is destroyed. Drainage is
violated. Wooden staircases leading to the Khan’s Lodge are in an emergency state. Wooden column
of the wooden eastern facade is sagging and damaged by pests.
[…]
Annex 1239
Annex 1240
Letter of the Head of the National Writers’ Union of Ukraine to
the Head of the Council of Ministers of the Autonomous Republic
of Crimea No. 502/01-12, 6 September 2005
1
Translation
Translated from Ukrainian
/Signature/
(Coat of Arms)
THE NATIONAL WRITERS’ UNION OF UKRAINE
SECRETARIAT
01024, Kiev, Bankova St., 2
6 September 2005 Ref. No. 502/01-12
In reply to Ref. No. _____ dd ______
01024, Kiev, vul. Bankova
e-mail: nspu@і.kіеу.u
web-site: www.nspu.kiev.u
tel/fax (044) 253-45-8
tel (044) 253-95-5
[In handwriting: A.A. Vysych
L.M. Ivanova
Please prepare an answer by 19 September 2005
/Signature/]
TO HEAD OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS
OF THE AUTONOMOUS REPUBLIC OF CRIMEA
A.S. MATVIENKO
Dear Anatoliy Sergeevich,
For many years, the National Writers’ Union of Ukraine has expressed concern about the situation
around the outstanding historical-architectural literary and memorial monuments in the Autonomous Republic
of Crimea associated with the names of famous Ukrainian writers and public figures.
Back in 1993, the Congress of Ukrainians of the South of Crimea requested the Council of People’s
Deputies of Yalta “to create a museum of Stepan Rudansky on the basis of the memorial house on Radin
Square in Yalta.” The museum was not created, and the memorial house was privatized by Resolution of the
Yalta City Executive Committee No. 616 dated 31 December 1997.
The official applications of the Yalta City Society “Prosvita”, the Yalta City Center “Union of
Ukrainian Women”, the collective letters to the Government of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, the Yalta
City Executive Committee, the Culture Department of the Yalta City Council do not have proper understanding
and constructive solutions.
Instead, it was proposed to create... “expositions dedicated to the life and work of Stepan Rudansky in
the new exposition of the Lesya Ukrainka Museum” or “a public museum of the writer at a school with the
Ukrainian language of teaching, which seeks to have the name of S.V. Rudansky.”
By the way, the Lesya Ukrainka Museum in Yalta as a department with the status of a museum of the
Yalta State Historical and Literary Museum since 1993 has required reconstruction for a long time.
Also, referring to the recent letter to the National Writers’ Union of Ukraine, signed by a group of
writers and residents of the village of Simeiz, we ask you to pay attention to the rather tragic fate of the roommuseum
of M.M. Kotsyubinsky in the village of Simeiz, which simply ceased to exist in 2000.
/Signature/
16 September 2005
/Stamp: Ministry of Culture of the Crimea/ /Stamp/
Annex 1240
2
[In handwrtiting: Ivanov] The classic of Belarusian literature M. Bogdanovich also deserves a memorial and
museum honoring in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, because his ashes were buried at the Yalta
cemetery, which fact was noted many times by the Writers’ Union of Belarus.
We believe that a comprehensive solution to these problems will contribute not only to popularizing
the works of classics, but also to the cultural and patriotic education, mainly, of young people being citizens
of the independent Ukraine, as well as to strengthening the intercultural and interethnic relations, primarily,
within the Autonomous Republic of Crimea.
We count upon your understanding and support.
Respectfully yours,
Head of the National Writers’
Union of Ukraine, People’s
Deputy of Ukraine /Signature/ V. YAVOROVSKY
Annex 1240
Annex 1241
Letter of non-governmental organizations to the
Mayor of Yalta, 14 March 2007
Translation
Translated from Ukrainian
14 March 2007
Attn: Mayor of Yalta
Dear Sergey Borisovich,
The Ukrainian society of the city is concerned about the condition of the Lesya Ukrainka Museum in
Yalta. The building, registered as a state monument, is being destroyed before our eyes. The carved balcony,
the disrepair of which is not in doubt, loses its appearance. For several years, the information about
reconstructing the building-museum has been circulated. In particular, in the current sixth issue of “The
Yuzhnaya Gazette”, published on the eve of Lesya Ukrainka’s birthday, it is reported that the final annual
meeting of cultural workers of the city discussed what was planned for this year: “restoration of the Lesya
Ukrainka Museum”. However, in our opinion, no real step has been taken in this direction.
The name of Lesya Ukrainka is a national symbol, the writings of the poetess are recognized as an
asset of the world culture, and the Lesya Museum is an iconic landmark of Yalta for all guests of the Crimean
resort interested in the culture of the titular nation of the Ukrainian State. The current condition of the Lesya
Ukrainka Museum is shameful. We hope that you share our position and do not abandon the declared plans for
restoring the museum. Please inform us of the specific dates and the scope of repair works. We consider it
necessary to take public control over the restoration of the Lesya Ukrainka Museum.
On behalf of the general meeting of the Yalta national democratic organizations:
/Seal: “PROSVITA” (Illegible)/
Head of the Yalta Society “Prosvita” /Signature/ V. Oliynyk
Head of the Yalta City
Non-governmental Organization “Union of
Ukrainian Women”
/Seal: UKRAINE *
THE
AUTONOMOUS
REPUBLIC OF
CRIMEA * YALTA
* YALTA NONGOVERNMENTAL
ORGANIZATION
“UNION OF
UKRAINIAN
WOMEN”/
/Signature/ B. Shevchuk
Head of the Spiritual and Educational Information Center /Signature/ V. Golenko
/Stamp: Spiritual And Educational Center * 98612 Yalta, P.O. Box 63/
Annex 1241
Annex 1242
Letter of Chairman of the Congress,
Coordination Council of Ukrainians of the
South of Crimea to the Mayor of Yalta,
11 October 2010
1
Translation
Translated from Ukrainian
Dear Sergey Borisovich,
The letter of the Commission on Culture and Spiritual Revival at the Verkhovna Rada of the Ukrainian
Soviet Socialist Republic No. 06-13/20-154 dated 20 April 1991 says “about the creation of the Lesya
Ukrainka Memorial House-Museum in Yalta”, but only the apartment-museum has been opened.
The letter of the Yalta City Council of Deputies No. M-34/3 290/2 dated 28 September 2005 states
that “the Lesya Ukrainka Museum (Department of the Yalta Historical and Literary Museum) needs expansion,
and the house, in which it is located (8 Yekaterininskaya Street), needs restoration. This problem has been put
under the control of the Council of Ministers of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea; the repair and restoration
works of the Lesya Ukrainka Museum together with the Chekhov Theater are planned in the near future.”
The Chekhov Theater was restored and opened officially in 2008, “and the Lesya Ukrainka Museum
was forgotten” (the newspaper “Galichina” dated 10 April 2008, Ivano-Frankivsk, Regional Council of
Deputies).
Dear Sergey Borisovich, when will the memorial house be restored and when will the Lesya Ukrainka
House-Museum be opened?
Enclosure: 4 sheets.
Respectfully yours,
Chairman of the Congress,
Coordination Council of
Ukrainians of the South of
Crimea /Signature/
11 October 2010
Mysyak,
Myroslav P.
27/32 Suvorovskaya Street.
Yalta - 7
Phone […]
[In handwriting:
M 54/3724/2
of 11 October 2010
Attn: Ms. Larisa
Viktorova,
Correspondence Office
[phone number]
To Mayor of Yalta,
the Autonomous Republic of
Crimea
S.B. Braiko
Annex 1242
2
VERKHOVNA RADA OF THE UKRAINIAN SSR
——
Commission on Culture and Spiritual Revival
Ref. No. 06.13/20.154 20 April 1991
To E.S. Leshchuk
Dear Evgenia Stepanovna,
Thank you for your letter. After its consideration, the Commission addressed a request to the
Chairman of the Council of Ministers of the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic V.P. Fokin so that he
would assign once again the consideration of the issue of establishing the Lesya Ukrainka Memorial
House-Museum in Yalta to the relevant executive bodies and oblige them to solve this problem as soon
as possible.
Respectfully
yours,
Chairman of the
Commission
/Signature/
L.S. TANYUK
Annex 1242
4
• Heritage
And They Have Forgotten About the Lesya Ukrainka Museum
Not long ago, after the reconstruction, the Chekhov Theater was officially opened in Yalta. The opening
ceremony was attended by honored guests: Chairman of the Supervisory Board of NRB-Ukraine
Vyacheslav Yutkin, a big fan of Chekhov's works; Minister of Defense of Ukraine Yuriy Yekhanurov; and
other well-known politicians, people of culture and arts of Ukraine and Russia.
The Honored Artist of Ukraine, Director of the
A. Chekhov Yalta Theater Mykola Rudnyk said:
“The ancient Greeks said: a city becomes a city
when there is a theater in it. The Chekhov Theater
has returned to Yalta. It is waiting for you.”
However, the resort pearl of the State, Yalta, needs
not only the A. Chekhov Theater, but also the
Museum of Lesya Ukrainka, Stepan Rudansky and
other sons and daughters of Ukraine who lived and
worked here. However, for some reason, numerous
speakers have not even mention this. And the Lesya
Ukrainka Museum and monument are located next
to the Chekhov Theater. And the secretary of the
Yalta City Council O. Chabanov in the letter to my
request back in 2005 said: the Lesya Ukrainka
Museum (Department of the Yalta Historical and
Literary Museum) needs now to be expanded, and
the house, in which it is located (8 Yekaterininskaya
Street), needs to be restored.
This problem has been put under the control of the
Council of Ministers of the Autonomous Republic
of Crimea; the repair and restoration works of the
Lesya Ukrainka Museum together with the A.
Chekhov Theater are planned in the near future. The
theme of the expanded exhibition provides for
coverage of the role of Stepan Rudansky in the
social and cultural life of Yalta and his creative
heritage, as well as other Ukrainian writers and
cultural workers who lived and worked on the
southern coast of the Crimea.
But the promises have not been kept and seen
by the Crimeans followers of the works of Lesya
Ukrainka and Stepan Rudansky. Why are Russian
classics honored in Crimea, but Ukrainian classics
forgotten? The question, of course, is rhetorical.
Myroslav MYSYAK.
Chairman of the Congress, Coordination Council
of Ukrainians of the South of Crimea
The city of Yalta
The city of Ivano-Frankivsk
Regional Council of Deputies
The “Galichina” newspaper
10 April 2008
Phone/fax: […]
Annex 1242
Annex 1243
Al-Wa’i (Consciousness), Muslims, declare a righteous Caliphate
according to the method of prophecy with Hizb ut-Tahrir and do
not ask for help from the West, No. 291, March 2011 (excerpts)
Translation
Excerpts
No. 291
[…] March 2011
Al-Wa’i
[…]
Muslims, declare a righteous Caliphate
according to the method of prophecy
with Hizb ut-Tahrir and do not
ask for help from the West
[…]
Page 2
[…]
Yes, real change in Muslim countries must encompass two facets:
1) That Islam by its doctrine and Shariah should guide the Muslims by establishing an Islamic state where its
Muslim and non-Muslim citizens would have all their rights that Islam has endowed them with. And that it
through Jihad spread Islam and lead people to its good, freeing them from the evils of the capitalist West.
2) Eliminate all foreign interference in Muslim countries Muslims and forbid them to resort to their help.
[…]
[Contain materials recognised as extremist in the Russian Federation]
Annex 1243
Annex 1244
Mr Kuzmin’s employment record book
1
Translation
Translated from Ukrainian
AO No. 049240
Employment Record Book
Last name Kuzmin
Name Leonid
Patronymic Aleksandrovich
Date of birth 11 April 1990
(day, month, year)
Date of completion 25 August 2011
Signature of the holder /Signature/
Signature of the employee
responsible for keeping
employment record books
Place of
Signature /Signature/
(legibly)
EMPLOYMENT RECORDS
Date Information on employment, transfer to a different
position, and employment termination
(indicating the reasons and references to the
statutory article, clause)
Basis for making the
entry (document, its
date and number)
Day Month Year
2 3 4
Student in Taurida Humanitarian-Ecological
Institute from 1 September 2007 to 30 June 2011
Diploma
KR No. 41277546
of 30 June 2011
25 08 2011
Appointed to the position of a teacher in the
Educational Complex “Kindergarten – School”
No. 15
Order of City Education
Department No. 1172-k
of 25 August 2011
05 01 2015 On 5 January 2015, the Educational Complex
“Kindergarten – School” No. 15 of Simferopol
City Council was renamed to Municipal
Budgetary General Educational Institution
“Kindergarten –School” No. 15 of
Decree of Simferopol
City Administration,
Republic of Crimea
No. 20 of 16 December
2014
Annex 1244
2
AO No. 049240 AO No. 049240
EMPLOYMENT RECORDS
Date Information on employment, transfer to a different
position, and employment termination
(indicating the reasons and references to the
statutory article, clause)
Basis for making the
entry (document, its
date and number)
Day Month Year
2 3 4
the Simferopol Urban District Municipality
Director /Signature/ I.V. Potemkina
10 03 2015
Dismissed from the position of a teacher
voluntarily according to Paragraph 3 of Part 1 of
Article 77 of the Labor Code of the Russian
Federation
Director /Signature/ I.V. Potemkina
Order No. 20-k
dated 10 March 2015
Annex 1244
Annex 1245
Lease agreement No. A-46/12, 28 September 2012
(excerpts)
1
Translation
Excerpts
LEASE AGREEMENT No. А-46/12
(NON-RESIDENTIAL PREMISES)
Bakhchisaray 28 September 2012
The Lessor, Utilities Enterprise Housing Repair and Operation Enterprise of the Bakhchisaray City
Council, represented by Dmitry Vasilievich Zhigulin, the Director, acting under the contract, on the one part,
and
The Lessee, Non-Profit Organization Teachers’ Council represented by Dilyara Abduldzhemilovna
Seytvelieva, the chairman, acting under the Minutes of the General Meeting of 5 January 2012, on the other
part,
on the grounds of Record No. 4 of the meeting of the tender committee to determine the lessee of a communal
property facility of the Bakhchisaray territorial community of 21 September 2012, received and registered in
the Lessor’s incoming correspondence book under incoming No. 957 of 27 September 2012, enter into this
Agreement and hereby agree as follows:
1. Subject matter of the Agreement
1.1. The Lessor shall provide, and the Lessee shall accept, under a hand-over certificate (Appendix 1), for
temporary paid use, non-residential premises in the basement recorded in the balance sheet of Utilities
Enterprise Housing Repair and Operation Enterprise of the Bakhchisaray City Council on ulitsa Pushkina, 1.
1.1.2. Address: Bakhchisaray, Pushkina St. 1.
1.1.3. Total area: 115 sq.m.
1.1.4. The value of the leased non-residential premises amounts to one hundred seventy-four thousand seven
hundred forty (174,740) hryvnias, VAT excluded, on the grounds of the Independent Appraisal Report as of 4
April 2012, provided by the Lessee.
1.1.5. The conditions of the leased facility are specified in the hand-over certificate (Appendix 1).
2. Purposes and conditions of use of the leased facility
2.1. The leased facility is leased to accommodate the non-profit organization.
[…]
4. Rent
4.1. The price for the property was determined based on an appraisal report drawn up by an appraiser in
accordance with the requirements of the Methods for the Appraisal of Leased Facilities approved by Decree
of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 629 of 10 August 1995, the Property Appraisal Methods approved
by Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 1891 of 10 December 2003. The base rate for calculation
of the rent for September 2012 amounts to 17.47 hryvnias, VAT included (Appendix 2).
4.2. The rent for the first month of the lease, i.e. September 2012, amounts to Seventeen hryvnias 47 kopecks
(17.47), VAT included.
4.3. The rent for each subsequent month shall be determined by adjusting the rent for the past month by
the inflation index for the current month, set by the State Statistics Committee of Ukraine. The rent shall be
paid monthly by the Lessee against the invoices issued by the Lessor.
[…]
6. Rights and obligations of the Lessor
6.1. The Lessor shall:
6.1.1. transfer the facility to the Lessee in accordance with Clause 3.1 hereof;
6.1.2. refrain from any actions which may hinder the use of the leased property by the Lessee on the terms
and conditions set forth herein;
6.2. The Lessor shall have the right to:
6.2.1. check that the Lessee is using the leased facility for the purpose specified herein;
Annex 1245
2
6.2.2. not give the Lessee its consent to improve the leased facility;
6.2.3. demand the termination of the Agreement if:
а) the Lessee transferred the leased facility to a third party without the Lessor's consent;
b) the Lessee, by its actions, creates a risk of deterioration of the quality of the facility or its destruction;
c) the Lessee fails to pay for the leased property for 3 months without a valid reason;
6.2.4. demand that the Lessee duly perform its obligations;
6.2.5. access the premises without the Lessee's consent in the event of an accident (emergency situation) to
eliminate or prevent the accident (emergency situation);
6.2.6. restrict the Lessee's access to the leased premises in the events provided for by the Agreement and
the applicable laws, including in the event of overdue payments under this Agreement;
6.2.7. initiate amendments and supplements to the Agreement in respect of the leased premises, in
accordance with the laws of Ukraine and this Agreement.
7. Rights and obligations of the Lessee
7.1. Obligations of the Lessee:
7.1.1. Use the leased property in accordance with its intended purpose and on the terms and conditions of
this Agreement, namely Clause 2.1;
7.1.2. Pay rent timely and in full: on the 20th–21st day of the month following the reporting month, the Lessee
shall collect the invoice from the Lessor and pay it within 5 days;
7.1.3. Keep the leased facility in good standing order;
7.1.4. Grant access to the leased facility to the Lessor's representatives to check its use, and on other
grounds in accordance with this Agreement;
7.1.5. maintain the leased facility in proper conditions, take measures to protect the environment to comply
with environmental standards for the operation of the facility; create safe and harmless working conditions;
ensure fire safety in accordance with the Fire Safety Rules of Ukraine;
7.1.6. The Lessee shall, autonomously and in its own name, enter into agreements with specialized
organizations for the provision of utilities in full, namely, to enter into a power supply agreement with
the Bakhchisaray regional transmission company; water and sewage utilities plant (PPVKKh);
provision of heat supply services with Utilities Enterprise Housing Repair and Operation Enterprise of
the Bakhchisaray City Council, etc.
7.1.7. In the event of expiry or termination of the Agreement, return the leased property to the Lessor in
good conditions, no worse than at the time it was leased, taking into account normal wear and tear, and
reimburse the Lessor for any losses in the event of deterioration or loss (full or partial) of the leased property
through the Lessee's fault;
7.1.8. be fully responsible for compliance with the laws, the rules for the operation of utilities networks, the
sanitary conditions of the leased property;
7.1.9. agree with the Lessor on amendments to the composition of the leased property, its reconstruction,
which will cause an increase in its value;
7.1.10. to improve the area adjacent to the facility within 1 year from the date of entry into the agreement;
7.1.11. privatization, sublease and transfer of the property title to the leased property to third parties without
the Lessor's consent are prohibited;
7.1.12. keep the Premises in proper conditions, namely: in accordance with technical, fire and sanitary
standards, prevent damage and deterioration, maintain the external and internal appearance of the Premises by
performing routine repairs when needed. At the end of the lease term, and/or in case of damage to the Premises
through the Lessee's fault, at its own expense, eliminate malfunctions and breakdowns of utilities and
equipment of the Premises. The Parties have agreed that, for the purposes of this Agreement, such repairs are
not improvements to the Premises, since they are carried out for the Lessee's internal needs and exclusively
for the purposes of its economic activities.
7.1.13.The Lessee shall provide round-the-clock access to the rented premises to the Lessor's employees in
the event of any accident, emergency, etc. to eliminate an incident or emergency;
7.1.14.immediately notify the Lessor of any damage caused to the Premises through its fault, third parties'
fault and/or due to natural causes;
7.1.15. have all the necessary permits, licenses and other documents required to perform economic activities
in accordance with the applicable laws of Ukraine, and, at the Lessor's request, provide duly certified copies
of these documents;
7.1.16.Within one month from the entry into this Agreement, insure the leased property for the whole term of
Annex 1245
3
the lease, for an amount no less than its market value specified in the independent appraisal report, in favor of
the Asset Holder as the party which bears the risk of accidental loss or damage of the facility, in accordance
with the procedure established by the applicable laws. Provide the Lessor with a copy of the insurance contract
certified by the Lessee's seal and a copy of the order for payment of the insurance premium within five days
from the date of receipt of the insurance contract;
7.1.17. guarantee the payment of rent: pay rent one month in advance.
[…]
8 Liability of the Parties and dispute resolution
8.1.The Parties shall be liable for nonperformance or improper performance of their obligations hereunder in
accordance with the applicable laws of Ukraine.
8.2. Any disputes arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, which cannot be settled through
negotiations. shall be settled in court.
8.3. If the Lessee fails to pay rent for three months, the Agreement shall be deemed terminated from the date
of receipt by the Lessee of the Lessor's termination letter. The property shall be returned in accordance with
Section 3 of the Agreement.
8.4. The Party which, by its actions, caused losses to the other Party, shall compensate them in full.
8.5. The expiry of the Agreement shall not release the Parties from their liability for any violations committed
during the term of this Agreement.
8.6. The Parties shall not be held liable under this Agreement in the event of force majeure circumstances
(man-caused, natural or environmental emergencies) that make it impossible to fulfill the terms of the
Agreement.
8.7. Should the circumstances specified in Clause 8.6. arise, the affected Party shall immediately notify the
other Party about the said circumstances; otherwise, the Parties shall lose the right to refer to these
circumstances.
9. Term, conditions for the amendment and termination of the agreement, miscellaneous
9.1. This Agreement is made for 2 years and 11 months, and shall be in force from 28 September 2012
through 27 August 2015 inclusive.
9.2. Any amendments or supplements to this Agreement may be made by mutual agreement between the
Parties, with mandatory execution of a written document. Any proposed amendments or supplements shall be
considered by the Parties and drawn up as supplementary agreements to the lease agreement.
9.4. The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall remain in force throughout its term, including in the
cases when, after its conclusion, the laws establish any rules which may worsen the Lessee's position in
connection with rent and discharge of obligations. The Agreement may be terminated by agreement between
the Parties.
This Agreement may be terminated by a judgement of the Commercial Court at either Party's initiative, in
accordance with the applicable laws of Ukraine and this Agreement.
9.5. The reorganization of the Lessor or of the Lessee shall not provide the grounds for the amendment or
termination of this Agreement.
9.6. This Agreement shall be terminated in the following cases:
- expiry of its term;
- loss of the leased property;
- early termination of the Agreement by mutual agreement between the Parties or under a judgement of the
Commercial Court;
- the Lessee’s bankruptcy;
- in other cases provided for by the applicable laws of Ukraine.
9.7. The relations between the Parties not regulated by this Agreement shall be governed by the applicable
laws of Ukraine.
9.8. Upon expiry of the Agreement, the Lessee shall have the right to extend it for a new term in accordance
with the applicable laws of Ukraine and this Agreement.
9.9. This Agreement is made in two equally authentic copies.
Annex 1245
Annex 1246
Leaflet on the procedure for opting out of
Russian citizenship, 2014
Translation
Leaflet
I, […], have been informed of the procedure for obtaining the citizenship of the Russian Federation by the
persons detained at Simferopol pretrial detention center described below.
As on 21 March 2014, the Federal Constitutional Law “On the admission of the Republic of Crimea
to the Russian Federation and the formation of new constituent entities within the Russian Federation – the
Republic of Crimea and the federal city of Sevastopol” was adopted, as of 21 March 2014 the Ukrainian
nationals and stateless persons permanently residing on the territory of the Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol
as at the said date are recognized to be the citizens of the Russian Federation.
Individuals, who do not wish to take the citizenship of the Russian Federation, may manifest
their wish to preserve their other citizenship or to remain stateless within one month, that is, until 18
April 2014.
Under paragraph 21 of the Regulation on the Passport of a citizen of the Russian Federation (Decree
of the Government of the Russian Federation of 8 July 1997 No. 828): Passport of the individual detained or
convicted to imprisonment shall be temporarily seized by the preliminary investigation authority or the court
and attached to the case file of the said person. The passport shall be returned to the individual upon his release
from custody or upon completion of service of the sentence of imprisonment.
Obtaining the passport upon release from service of the sentence.
Under the provisions of Article 173(4) of the Criminal Law Enforcement Code of the Russian
Federation upon release from the prison, the passport kept on file shall be handed out to the convict. In case of
absence of the passport in the file, the convict shall have the right to submit an application for the issuance of
the passport with the administration of the correctional facility.
Based on the above, in accordance with the rules of the effective legislation of the Russian Federation,
the persons in custody have the right to obtain passport of a citizen of the Russian Federation during the service
of the sentence or upon release from the pretrial detention centers.
________________ 2014 _______________________
(signature)
Annex 1246
Annex 1247
Website of the Mejlis, “Mustafa Dzhemilev: Crimean Tatars will hold
their own referendum to determine the future of Crimea”,
27 March 2014
1
Translation
News
qtmm.org/новости/4393-мустафа-джемилев-крымские-татары-проведут-свой-референдум-по-определению-будущего-крыма
Mustafa Dzhemilev: “Crimean Tatars will hold their own referendum to determine the future of
Crimea” 27 March 2014
The unscheduled 2nd meeting of the Kurultai of Crimean Tatars, which will take place in Bakhchisaray on 29
March 2014, will make an important decision for the future of Crimea. “We will hold our representative
referendum among Crimean Tatars”, Mustafa Dzhemilev said in Brussels on 27 March 2014.
Press service of People’s Deputy of Ukraine Mustafa Dzhemilev shared this information on the official
website.
During his working visit to Brussels, Mustafa Dzhemilev gave a report before parliamentarians at the Council
of Europe. Mustafa Dzhemilev arrived in Brussels ahead of his visit to America; he took part in the Democratic
Reforms and the Ukrainian Example forum where he shared his opinion on the referendum held on 16 March
2014 in Crimea. He also mentioned that the Kurultai will take an important step to determine the future of
Crimea. “Our referendum will not be fake, unlike the Russian one. I intend to touch upon this subject in New
York, at the United Nations Security Council. Crimean Tatars will hold their own referendum on the status of
Crimea”, said Mustafa Dzhemilev.
According to Dzhemilev, Crimean Tatars are neither dreamers nor fortune-seekers, and their referendum will
show the rest of the world what kind of path has been chosen by imperialists and occupants. “It's possible that
Russia will ban the broadcast of the referendum for the freedom-loving world”, Dzhemilev said. “In that case,
the entire world will see that Russia has no intention of protecting the rights of Crimean Tatars. Their actions
will show the consequences of the occupation to the rest of the world”.
Mustafa Dzhemilev said that a particular part of Crimean Tatars – some women and children – had to leave
Crimea out due to the threat of violence. He also said that the reaction to the occupation of the Crimea was
underwhelming.
Annex 1247
2
In Brussels, Mustafa Dzhemilev was greeted by Vytautas Landsbergis, former Head of the Seimas of the
Republic of Lithuania, currently – Member of the European Parliament. Here is what Landsbergis had to say
regarding the annexation of Crimea: “Nazi Germany no longer exists, but fascist Russia does”.
Emanuelis Zingeris, a Lithuanian parliamentarian, who chaired the forum, said in his closing speech: “On the
outside, things seem to be quiet in Europe. But, on the inside, it's high time to wake up and become aware of the
dangers. We are facing new geopolitical realities”.
While in Brussels, Mustafa Dzhemilev was accompanied by Economic Advisor of the Mejlis of the Crimean
Tatar People Rustem Umerov, and Representative of the Mejlis in Germany Ahmet Özay.
Annex 1247
Annex 1248
Website of the Mejlis, “Head of the Mejlis: When we see that it is
necessary to show a clear and explicit will of the Crimean Tatar people,
we will hold a referendum”, 29 March 2014 (excerpts)
Annex 1249
Website of the Mejlis, Decision of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar
People “On addressing practical issues relating to the settlement of the
Crimean Tatar people under the existing circumstances of Crimea”,
1 April 2014 (excerpts)
Annex 1250
Website “Mirotvorets”, page dedicated to Mr Zaur Smirnov,
29 April 2015
https://myrotvorets.center/criminal/smirnov-zaur-ruslanovich/
Translation
20 December 2020 Zaur Ruslanovich Smirnov - Mirotvorets.center
MIROTVORETS
Center for Research of Signs of Crimes against the National Security of Ukraine, Peace, Humanity, and
the International Law
Information for law enforcement authorities and special services about pro-Russian terrorists, separatists,
mercenaries, war criminals, and murderers
Search
Smirnov Zaur Ruslanovich / Смирнов Заур Русланович / Смирнов Заур Русланович
Date of Birth: 18 January 1976
Country: Ukraine
Address: Autonomous Republic of Crimea, Simferopol
Accomplice of the invaders. Traitor.
Position: Chairman of the State Committee for Interethnic Relations and Deported Citizens of the Republic
of Crimea (appointed in April 2014).
From 1999 to 2013, he worked as the Head of the Department for Interethnic Migration Affairs of the Yalta
City Council.
Date of Birth: 18 January 1976 (Leninabad, Tajikistan). Married, two sons.
Residence address: Autonomous Republic of Crimea, Simferopol
http://rk.gov.ru/rus/info.php?id=603942
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/zaur.smirnov
The Mirotvorets Center asks law enforcement agencies to consider this publication on the website as a
statement about the commission of deliberate acts by this citizen against the national security of Ukraine,
peace, human security and international law, as well as other offenses.
#R197191X176A107A184A167N
29 April 2015 NATO Complain
Annex 1250
Annex 1251
Website of the Mejlis, Resolution of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar
People “On the situation regarding the Russian Federation officials’
ban for Mustafa Dzhemilev to enter his homeland – Crimea”,
2 May 2014
Translation
News
qtmm.org/новости/4473-решение-меджлиса-крымскотатарского-народа-о-ситуации-сложившейся-в-свя
зи-с-запретом-официальными-властями-российской-федерации-въезда-мустафе-джемилеву-на-свою-родину-к
рым
Resolution of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people “On the situation regarding the Russian Federation
officials’ ban for Mustafa Dzhemilev to enter his homeland – Crimea”
2 May 2014
Resolution
of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People
“On the situation regarding the Russian Federation officials’ ban for Mustafa Dzhemilev to enter his
homeland —Crimea”
On 2 May 2014, for the leader of the Crimean Tatar People, delegate of the Qurultay of the Crimean Tatar
People, People’s Deputy of Ukraine Mustafa Dzhemilev overwhelming circumstances were created which
prevented him from entering his homeland – Crimea.
Having arrived to Moscow by a flight from Kiev, purposing to continue his trip to Simferopol, by
responsible authorities of the Russian Federation Mustafa Dzhemilev was informed that he was
banned from entering Crimea and prescribed to return to Kiev.
This act of outrageous violation of the human right to freedom of movement, especially against the legendary
human rights activist, leader of the Crimean Tatar People Mustafa Dzhemilev who was returning to his
homeland – Crimea, where his family, relatives and friends live, caused tremendous resonance and indignation
among Crimean Tatars.
Given the current situation and aiming to prevent future violations of the rights of Crimean Tatars – indigenous
people of the Crimea, who suffered total deportation from their land and were forced to live in places of
eviction for about half a century in the former USSR,
the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People has decided to:
1. Condemn the Russian Federation officials’ ban to freely enter his homeland against the legendary human
rights activist, leader of the Crimean Tatar People Mustafa Dzhemilev as an act of outrageous violation of the
human right to freedom of movement, as a cynical prohibition of one’s homeland.
2. Cancel the celebration of all-Crimean event “Crimean Tatar national holiday ‘Hidirlez’” on 3 May 2014 in
the entertainment center “Scheherazade”, as incompatible due to outrageous violations of human rights and the
rights of Crimean Tatars.
3. Put the delegates of the Qurultay of Crimean Tatars and chairmen of regional Mejlises in charge of
explaining the reasons for such decision of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people to the public.
4. On 3 May 2014 at 9 a.m., hold a peaceful event dedicated to welcoming the legendary human rights activist,
leader of the Crimean Tatar People Mustafa Dzhemilev at the entry to the Crimea near the Armyansk
checkpoint (gathering on the Simferopol–Kherson highway at the exit from Armyansk).
Chairman
of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People Refat Chubarov
2 May 2014
Annex 1251
Annex 1252
Decision of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People No. 24 “On a
member of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People Remzi Ilyasov”,
23 August 2014
Translation
DECISION of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People No. 24 of 23 August 2014 On a member of the
Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People Remzi ILYASOV
qtmm.org/о-члене-меджлиса-крымскотатарского-народа-ильясове-ремзи
Home
DECISION
of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People
No. 24 of 23 August 2014
On a member of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People,
Remzi ILYASOV
The member of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People Remzi ILYASOV, personally, without a
corresponding decision of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People, agreed to take an office of the Deputy
Chairman of the State Council of the Republic of Crimea and on 21 May 2014 took this office.
At the same time, Remzi ILYASOV, in disregard of Decision of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People
No. 16, of 12 June 2014, “On the upcoming elections of deputies of the State Council and representative
bodies of the municipalities in the Republic of Crimea” in accordance to which the bodies of national selfgovernment
of the Crimean Tatars are ordered not to nominate candidates for the election of deputies of the
State Council of Crimea and the representative bodies of the municipalities of the Republic of Crimea,
registered as a candidate for deputy of the State Council of the Republic of Crimea for the multi-mandate
constituency under the lists of the political party “United Russia” and withdrew from participation in the
activities of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People.
At the same time, Remzi ILYASOV appears in the mass media with statements and comments incompatible
with the status of a delegate of the Qurultay of the Crimean Tatar People and a member of the Mejlis of the
Crimean Tatar People, determined by the Regulations of the Qurultay of the Crimean Tatar People and the
Statut on the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People, openly opposes the implementation of the decisions taken
by the Qurultay of the Crimean Tatar People and the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People.
Remzi ILYASOV took above mentioned actions against the background of increased open opposition by the
Crimean authorities to the implementation of the legitimate political and other activities of the Mejlis of the
Crimean Tatar People, by the discriminatory actions taken by the security agencies against the Crimean
Tatars resulting in the persecution of Muslims, illegal searches in mosques and madrasahs, the ban on
holding peaceful assemblies and meetings by the Crimean Tatars, the ban for the leader of the Crimean Tatar
people Mustafa Dzhemilev, the Chairman of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People Refat Chubarov, the
Adviser to the Chairman of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People Ismet Yuksel, on entering the territory of
the Crimea.
In view of the aforesaid and according to the decisions of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People No. 16 of
12 June 2014 and No. 20 of 5 July 2014,
the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People HAS DECIDED:
1. To suspend the membership of Remzi ILYASOV in the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People until the
next session of the Qurultay of the Crimean Tatar People is convened.
2. To propose to the Audit Commission of the Qurultay of the Crimean Tatar People to consider the
compliance of the activities of Remzi ILYASOV, the delegate of the Qurultay of the Crimean Tatar People,
with the Regulations of the Qurultay of the Crimean Tatar People and the Regulation on the Mejlis of the
Crimean Tatar People and to introduce an appropriate conclusion for consideration by the delegates of the
Qurultay of the Crimean Tatar People.
The Chairman
of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People Refat Chubarov
Annex 1252
Annex 1253
Decision of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people No. 21 “On a
member of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People, the Deputy
Chairman of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People, Zaur
Smirnov”, 23 August 2014
Translation
Decision of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People No. 21 of 23 August 2014 On Zaur SMIRNOV, a
member of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People, the Deputy Chairman of the Mejlis of the Crimean
Tatar People
qtmm.org/о-члене-меджлиса-крымскотатарского-народа-заместителе-председателя-меджлиса-
крымскотатарского-народа-смирнове-зауре
Home
DECISION
of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People
No. 21 of 23 August 2014
On a member of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People,
the Deputy Chairman of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People Zaur
SMIRNOV
By its Decision No. 20 of 5 July 2014 “On the cancellation of the decision of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar
People No. 13 of 1 April 2014 “On solving practical issues related to the settlement of the Crimean Tatar
People in the real conditions of Crimea” the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People recalled the member of the
Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People, the Deputy Chairman of the Mejlis Zaur SMIRNOV, previously
delegated to the office of the Chairman of the State Committee on Interethnic Relations and Deported
Citizens of the Republic of Crimea, from participating in the executive bodies of the Republic of Crimea.
Zaur SMIRNOV did not implement the specified decision of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People and he
made a number of political statements incompatible with the status of the delegate of the Qurultay of the
Crimean Tatar People and a member of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People, determined by the
Regulations of the Qurultay of the Crimean Tatar People and the Statute on the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar
People.
In view of the aforesaid, the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People HAS DECIDED:
1. To dismiss Zaur SMIRNOV from the office of the Deputy Chairman of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar
People — Head of the Department of work with national self-governance bodies, state executive power of
Crimea, local self-governance bodies, deputies of councils of all levels.
2. To propose to the Audit Commission of the Qurultay of the Crimean Tatar People to consider the
compliance of the activities of the delegate of the Qurultay of the Crimean Tatar People Zaur SMIRNOV,
with the Regulations of the Qurultay of the Crimean Tatar People and the Statute on the Mejlis of the
Crimean Tatar People and to introduce an appropriate conclusion for consideration by the delegates of the
Qurultay.
The Chairman
of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People Refat Chubarov
Annex 1253
Annex 1254
Decision of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people No. 22 “On a
member of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People, the Head of the
Legal Department of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People, Teyfuk
Gafarov”, 23 August 2014
Translation
DECISION of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People No. 22 of 23 August 2014 On a member of the
Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People, the Head of the Legal Department of the Mejlis of the Crimean
Tatar People Teifuk GAFAROV
qtmm.org/о-члене-меджлиса-крымскотатарского-народа-руководителе-юридического-управления-
меджлиса-крымскотатарского-народа-гафарове-тейфуке
Home
DECISION
of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People
No. 22 of 23 August 2014
On a member of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People, the Head of the Legal Department of the
Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People Teifuk GAFAROV
The member of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People, the Head of the Legal Department of the Mejlis
Teifuk GAFAROV, personally, without a corresponding decision of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People
and notwithstanding the written objection of the Chairman of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People, agreed
to take an office of the Deputy Mayor of Simferopol.
Teifuk GAFAROV took this action against the background of increased open opposition by the Crimean
authorities to the implementation of the legitimate political and other activities of the Mejlis of the Crimean
Tatar People, by the discriminatory actions taken by the security agencies against the Crimean Tatars
resulting in the persecution of Muslims, illegal searches in mosques and madrasahs, the ban on holding
peaceful assemblies and meetings by the Crimean Tatars. At the same time, Teifuk GAFAROV made a
number of statements and comments in the media that were incompatible with the status of a delegate of the
Qurultay of the Crimean Tatar People and a member of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People, determined
by the Regulations of the Qurultay of the Crimean Tatar People and the Statute on the Mejlis of the Crimean
Tatar People.
In view of the aforesaid and according to the decisions of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People No. 20 of
5 July 2014, the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People HAS DECIDED:
1. To dismiss Teifuk GAFAROV from the office of the Head of the Legal Department of the Mejlis of the
Crimean Tatar People
2. To suspend the membership of Teifuk GAFAROV in the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People until the
next session of the Qurultay of the Crimean Tatar People is convened.
3. To propose to the Audit Commission of the Qurultay of the Crimean Tatar People to consider the
compliance of the activities of the delegate of the Qurultay of the Crimean Tatar People Teifuk GAFAROV,
with the Regulations of the Qurultay of the Crimean Tatar People and the Statute on the Mejlis of the
Crimean Tatar People and to introduce an appropriate conclusion for consideration by the delegates of the
Qurultay.
The Chairman
of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People Refat Chubarov
Annex 1254
Annex 1255
Facebook page of Anton Geraschenko, former Deputy of the
Verkhovna Rada, “To me, as well as to many well-known
journalists...”, 16 December 2014
1
Translation
Anton Gerashchenko - To me, as well as to many well-known journalists... | Facebook
Anton Gerashchenko is with Borys Filatov and 5 others.
16 December 2014, 00:27 a.m.
To me, as well as to many well-known journalists, bloggers and just nice people who are trusted on
Facebook, dozens of people every day wrote direct messages about certain persons who help terrorists and
separatists or are terrorists and separatists themselves.
I was not able to process such information flows on my own and asked everyone to report this information to
the address:
[email protected]
I asked this not unintentionally.
This information was slowly but surely accumulated on the website of the Center for Research of Crimes
against the National Security of Ukraine, Peace, Citizens’ Safety, founded by a group of volunteers led by
George Tuka.
Website address:
http://psb4ukr.org
Today in the database of the Center, as a result of the painstaking work of dozens of volunteers united by a
single impulse of love for Ukraine, more than 7,500 profiles of terrorists and separatists and their
accomplices have been collected.
The work on collecting information on them, as well as on their potential acquaintances, contacts in a
terrorism – free Ukraine continues.
Information from the website of the Center Mirotvorets has long been used by the Ministry of Internal
Affairs, the Security Service of Ukraine, the Intelligence Service, and the Border Guard Service to collect
information for opening criminal cases and obtaining a court decision on the detention and arrest of
separatists and terrorists.
To date, the Ministry of Internal Affairs alone has received court permits for the detention and arrest of more
than 500 separatists and terrorists. Including, based on data from the website of the Center Mirotvorets.
It is also recommended to use data from the website of the Center Mirotvorets by the soldiers of the antiterrorist
operation (ATO) forces when verifying documents at checkpoints when leaving the ATO zone and
entering a part of Ukraine free of terrorists.
If a document check reveals that a person is in the Center’s database, the person should be detained and sent
to the nearest police station for further verification of the person’s identity, connections, and contacts.
It should be understood that the mere fact of being in the database is not a guaranteed fact of committing a
crime by this person
However, this means that this person may be involved in crimes against the people of Ukraine. Therefore, if
this person is within the reach of law enforcement agencies, they should at least be interrogated.
I foresee screams that this website is violating the law on personal data. That you cannot collect the personal
data of other citizens.
No, you can!
First, because Article 17 of the Constitution of Ukraine reads: “Protecting the sovereignty and territorial
integrity of Ukraine, ensuring its economic and information security is the most important function of the
state, the matter of the entire Ukrainian people.”
Annex 1255
2
Therefore, everyone who reports to the law enforcement agencies or to the website of the Center Mirotvorets
or to Stopterror or other similar information and analytical portals is doing the right thing, according to the
state policy, helping to fight terrorism and separatism.
Secondly, the website of the Center Mirotvorets contains data obtained on the basis of open sources - the
analysis of websites Russian Spring, Novosti Novorosii and other informational hell-holes seeking to praise
yesterday’s drug addicts, alcoholics and perverts.
Thank you so much for giving us so much useful information with photos and videos about your so-called
“heroes”, whose place is at the slop-pail, where they will sooner or later find themselves.
I ask all concerned citizens of Ukraine and our foreign friends to help the Center Mirotvorets to collect data
on bandits and terrorists.
The technology of cooperation with the website of the Center Mirotvorets is simple:
1. You saw somewhere in the network or on the lying Russian media a message about some next
“hero” of Novorossiya.
2. Then go to the website of the Center Mirotvorets and search the name of the terrorist in the existing
database.
3. If the name is not in the database, then send information on the terrorist or separatist to the website’s
mail address.
4. If there is information on such terrorist or separatist in the database, then still send information on
the crime of this lowlife of which you became aware.
5. Volunteers will summarize the information you send and post it on the website.
6. Help, if you can, financially to the website of the Center Mirotvorets by transferring money to the
Privatbank card, which is indicated on the website in the right column. Money is needed to pay for the
services of highly qualified specialists who protect the website from powerful DDOS attacks that constantly
trying to interrupt its work. It is clear who organizes these attacks - those who thought that their crimes
would remain unknown and unpunished, but now they realize that all their crimes are known and recorded.
As the Holy Scripture says: “Meneh, tekel, upharsin”.
But we ask Cyberberkut and other evil spirits not to worry. Information about the profiles of terrorists and
separatists has been repeatedly mirrored and duplicated.
As the famous quote says: “Manuscripts don’t burn!”
The website of the Center Mirotvorets for me today is a prototype of the Ukrainian Simon Wiesenthal Center
created after the Second World War in Vienna to search for and punish Nazi criminals who killed millions of
innocent victims of all nationalities in Nazi concentration camps.
Yes, Ukraine is now too weak to find and eliminate terrorists and separatists on foreign territory. But sooner
or later, we will punish everyone who killed, tortured and crippled Ukrainian citizens and citizens of other
countries in our Donbas and Crimea.
Glory to Ukraine!
MAXIMUM REPOST PLEASE!
P. S. From now on, I urge you to send all available information on terrorists and separatists directly to the
website of the Center Mirotvorets.
Annex 1255
Annex 1256
Website “Mirotvorets”, page dedicated to Mr Seytumer Nimetullaev,
18 January 2015 (excerpts)
https://myrotvorets.center/criminal/nimetullaev-sejtumer-nuridinovich/
Translation
Excerpts
17 December 2020 Sejtumer Nuridinovich Nimetullaev - Mirotvorets.center
MIROTVORETS
Center for Research of Signs of Crimes against the National Security of Ukraine, Peace, Humanity, and
the International Law
Information for law enforcement authorities and special services about pro-Russian terrorists, separatists,
mercenaries, war criminals, and murderers
Search
Nimetullaev Sejtumer Nuridinovich / Ниметуллаев Сейтумер Нуридинович / Німетуллаєв Сєйтумєр
Нурідінович
Day of Birth: 10 June 1952
Country: Ukraine
Address: Kherson Oblast, Henichesk District, Novoalekseevka urban settlement, 162 Petrovsky St.
Separatist, Ex-Head of the Henichesk District Regional Administration.
Wanted by the Security Service of Ukraine under Part 1 of Art. 110 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.
Day of Birth: 10 June 1952
Wanted in connection with criminal proceedings under Part 2 of Art. 110 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine
(assault on the territorial integrity and inviolability of Ukraine). It was established that in the period from
May 2014 until now, the Former Head of the Henichesk District Regional Administration, by prior
conspiracy with the residents of the temporarily occupied territory of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea,
publicly called on the Internet to change the borders of the state border of Ukraine and violate the order
established by the Constitution of Ukraine. Read more here: http://112.ua/obshchestvo/prokuratura-nachalatri-
proizvodstva-protiv-eks-glavy-genicheskoy-oga-on-obyavlen-v-rozysk-134881.html
Nimetullaev promises not to give up Crimea
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wDxnaUwjLFo
The Mirotvorets Center asks law enforcement agencies to consider this publication on the website as a
statement about the commission of deliberate acts by this citizen against the national security of Ukraine,
peace, human security and international law, as well as other offenses.
#R89777X89A249A64A203N
18 January 2015 NATO Complain
[…]
Annex 1256
Annex 1257
Center for Journalist Investigations, “Natalia Kokorina left the
FSB building”, 13 March 2015
Translation
Center for Journalist Investigations Natalia Kokorina left the… https://investigator.org.ua/news/150844/print/
- Center for Journalist Investigations - https://investigator.org.ua -
Natalia Kokorina left the Federal Security Service (FSB) building
Posted By khurmanova On 13 March 2015 @ 7:04 pm In Yandex, Lenta Novostey | No Comments
Correspondent Natalia Kokorina of the Center for Journalist Investigations together with her attorney left the
FSB building, where she was interrogated for more than six hours.
As Natalia said at the exit, she had been interrogated as a witness in a criminal case. However, no details
have been released yet.
Be reminded that on Friday morning in Simferopol, FSB officers conducted a search in the apartment located
at the address of registration of Natalia Kokorina, the editor of the Center for Journalist Investigations. After
the search, the FSB detained the journalist. The interrogation took several hours.
Also, this morning the FSB conducted a search in the Crimean apartment of the parents of Anna
Andrievskaya, the author of the articles and former editor of the Center for Journalist Investigations, who no
longer lives in Crimea. As the journalist writes, the case was allegedly instituted on the basis of her material
about the volunteers of the battalion “Krym” (Crimea).
Head of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine Pavel Klimkin and Dunya Miyatovich, the OSCE
(Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe) Representative on Freedom of the Media, addressed
the Crimean “authorities” calling for release of Natalia Kokorina, correspondent of the Center for Journalist
Investigations, detained by the FSB. In addition, the OSCE said that the actions of the Crimean “authorities”
against journalists were repressions.
Article printed from the Center for Journalist Investigations: https://investigator.org.ua
URL to article: https://investigator.org.ua/news/150844/
Copyright © 2011 Center for Journalist Investigations.
1 of 1 14 April 2020, 1:01 AM
Annex 1257
Annex 1258
Council under the auspices of the President of the Russian Federation
for the Development of Civil Society and Human Rights, “Crimean
Tatars turned to Putin with a request to preserve the heritage of the
people – ATR TV channel”, 24 March 2015
1
Translation
http://www.president-sovet.ru/presscenter/publications/read/2660/
Crimean Tatars turned to Putin with a request to preserve the heritage of the people - ATR TV
channel
Crimean Tatars turned to Putin with a request to preserve the heritage of the people - ATR TV
channel
24 March 2015
The national movement of Crimean Tatars appealed to the President of the Russian Federation Vladimir
Putin with a request to help preserve the ATR media holding, which is “the treasure of the Crimean Tatar
people.” Similar statements are addressed to Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev, Head of the Human Rights
Council Mikhail Fedotov and Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation Yuri Chaika.
According to the “15minut” publication, the threat of broadcast ceasing has been talked about since 1 April
of the current year. This will happen if the ATR management fails to register the channel as a mass media by
the end of the month in accordance with Russian law.
According to the “Krym Media” (Crimea Media), the TV channel “Lyale” and the radio station “Meydan-
FM” are under threat of closing as well. The documents required for registration have been repeatedly
submitted to Roskomnadzor, but have not been approved.
“This has become a direct threat of closure of the world’s first and only Crimean Tatar TV channel and
radio, which deprives Crimean Tatars of the opportunity to preserve and develop the Crimean Tatar
language, culture, and national traditions. Since its foundation, the mentioned media resources have become
high-demand and popular not only among Crimean Tatars, but also among Kumyks, and Karachais, and
Balkars, Tatars, many other Turkic-speaking peoples, as well as among representatives of other nationalities
within the multinational Crimea and the entire Russian Federation”, says the open letter to President Putin
posted on Facebook by ATR employee Elzara Batalova.
The authors of the appeal indicate that the closing of two TV channels and a radio station “contravenes the
decree of Russian President Vladimir Putin on the rehabilitation of the Crimean Tatar people, and will also
negatively affect the development of interethnic concord in the Republic of Crimea”.
It should be noted that the Minister of Internal Policy, Information and Communications of the Republic
Crimea Dmitry Polonsky previously stated in a commentary to Crimean Mass Media that the Republic’s
media had enough time and opportunities to re-register. “Throughout this year, Roskomnadzor and I did
everything in our powers to persuade the media representatives to submit documents and register,” the
minister said in early March.
The process, according to Polonsky, “had minimal bureaucracy”: "The conditions were absolutely
transparent: just create a legal entity or re-register under Russian law, submit the documents and receive the
registration of the mass medium.”
As an example, the minister cited the television and radio company “Krym” (Crimea), which “registered five
mass media outlets in a week.” Dmitry Polonsky also reminded that after the 1st of April, media outlets that
did not undergo re-registration are not prohibited from registering a new publishing house.
A provocation or a crime against humanity?
The head of the Republic of Crimea Sergey Aksyonov believes that the problems with the Crimean Tatar TV
Annex 1258
2
channel broadcasting can be provoked by anti-Russian forces and used to stir up a scandal. According to RIA
Novosti, he claimed that at the press conference, answering the question of the ATR journalist, asked during
the teleconference. According to the Head of the Region, mistakes in the documents returned by
Roskomnadzor for revision might have been made deliberately. “Roskomnadzor has returned the documents
for revision.
This might be a deliberate use of precedent to cause a scandal. That is, the errors why Roskomnadzor returns
documents,” the prime minister said.
Aksyonov assured that the authorities of the Crimean peninsula are willing to discuss the problems with the
ATR leadership and assist in resolving them. In this regard, he added, “we agreed to keep in touch with the
channel”.
In the meantime, the Head of Crimea noted that “it would be wrong to act today, exclusively resolving issues
of protecting the interests of Ukraine on the territory of Crimea”. “We want the mass media to objectively
cover everything that happens. I do not understand why somebody would need to encourage people to hold
some rallies,” he explained, adding that regardless of the ATR functioning, the Crimean Tatar Public
Television will operate on the peninsula.
It is worth mentioning that this statement by Sergey Aksyonov was softer than his own statements a week
ago. Back then, he said that in “paramilitary time” work of such TV channels as ATR in Crimea is
unacceptable.
“It was made clear to the channel’s management that escalating the situation and creating tension among the
population, associated with the fact that the channel gives hope for the return of Crimea to Ukraine,
encouraging other people to act, and talking about how they would deal with those who got Russian
passports, the operation of such channels on the territory of the republic in the current paramilitary period is
unacceptable,” Aksyonov said during a meeting with journalists in Moscow. He emphasized that it was
unacceptable to “clash people against one another based on their ethnicity; they are trying to drive a wedge
between us, the Russians and the Crimean Tatars who have lived here for centuries”.
In turn, journalist Aydar Muzhdabaev in his blog on “Ekho Moskvy” channel perceives the fourth iteration
of documents submitted to Roskomnadzor as “actions aimed at oppressing people on a national basis. Which
is a crime against humanity”. In his telling,“almost nobody in Russia, including, alas, the liberal community,
cares about the tragedy of the Crimean Tatars, torn between countries, and suffocating in Crimea from
threats and repressions from the authorities and special services. In our country, we will not hear voices in
defense of ATR TV company”.
In such a situation, Muzhdabaev is sure, the last resort to rely on is the international organizations and
international sanctions. “Why does the Russian state television freely broadcast around the world, while the
Crimean Tatar people do not have the right to watch television in their homeland in their own language? I
would very much like to ask this question to both Russian and Western governments and elected officials,”
he writes.
“And speaking as a human, I would like to add something. Aren’t you ashamed of yourself, my Russia,
while calling yourself a great country, bullying a small and peaceful people? Who is your role model, Hitler
may be? Lord, what a shame that is,” the journalist exclaims.
In addition to that, on Wednesday, 25th of March, a telethon will start on ATR air, dedicated to the threat of
the resource’s closing. It will run daily with a break for newscasts until March 31 inclusive.
Annex 1258
Annex 1259
Website “Mirotvorets”, page dedicated to Mr Lenur Usmanov, 19
March 2015
1
https://myrotvorets.center/criminal/usmanov-lenur-abdulkhamitovich/
Translation
17 December 2020 Lenur Abdulhamitovich Usmanov - Mirotvorets.Center
MIROTVORETS
Center for Research of Signs of Crimes against the National Security of Ukraine, Peace, Humanity, and
the International Law
Information for law enforcement authorities and special services about pro-Russian terrorists, separatists,
mercenaries, war criminals, and murderers
Search
Usmanov Lenur Abdulhamitovich / Усманов Ленур Абдулхамитович / Усманов Ленур Абдулхамитович
Date of Birth: 29 August 1979
Country: Ukraine
Address: Autonomous Republic of Crimea, Sevastopol, 93 Forosskaya St.
Accomplice of Russian invaders. Participant to the Russian special operation to seize the Autonomous
Republic of Crimea.
1. An active participant in the so-called "Crimean Spring" (a special operation carried out by the Russian
authorities for the annexation of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea). He was awarded with the “For the
Return of Crimea” medal.
2. Participation in the so-called elections of deputies of the Council of the Orlinovsky Municipal District of
the City of Sevastopol of the second convocation (voting of 18 September 2016).
Source: http://www.sevastopol.vybory.izbirkom.ru.
Date of Birth: 29 August 1979
SRNP code: 2909519471.
Native city: Sevastopol
Military Unit: VCh A-3100, Ukraine, 1998-1999.
Place of work: in the same place. Sevastopol, 1979-2009, consultant.
Place of work:
20702589 — CJSC Shop No. 70 00.00.1900 00.00.1900;
24301396 — 28th Garrison House of Officers of the Ukrainian Navy 00.00.1900 00.00.1900;
2944917 — Sevastopol Chamber of Commerce and Industry 00.00.1900 00.00.1900;
26152948 — Sevastopol branch of JSC 00.00.1900 00.00.1900; 33581295 — IN MILITA PE
00.00.1900 00.00.1900;
33642923 — Black Sea State Basin Administration for the Protection of Water Resources 00.00.1900
00.00.1900.
Wife: Zarema Abdurashitova.
Brothers, sisters: Eskin Osmanov, Lilya Ibragimova.
Social media pages: https://vk.com/id20595397, http://ok.ru/profile/264522918444.
On awarding — http://milli-firka.org/content/DBAGHDHA.
Interview —
http://news.sevas.com/politics/lenur_usmanov_vystupil_protiv_politiki_medzhlisa_na_mitinge_v_sevastopol
e
Annex 1259
2
https://myrotvorets.center/criminal/usmanov-lenur-abdulkhamitovich/
On 26 February 2014, another rally of many thousands took place on Nakhimov Square. Among others, Lenur
Usmanov, a representative of the Crimean Tatar community of Sevastopol, spoke at it.
Lenur Usmanov stressed in his speech that he opposes the policy of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar
people. “The Mejlis usurped power among the Crimean Tatars, but it does not represent the entire Crimean
Tatar people. There are many organizations among us that are against its actions,” Lenur Usmanov said.
He told those who gathered in the square “a little terrible thing” - that he has personally been engaged in
countering extremist organizations for 14 years, and expressed confidence that the adoption of a relevant law
is necessary in Ukraine.
“Crimean Muslims are against extremism, but we are not asked, indeed exploited. For the last 20 years,
Crimean Tatars have been used all the time as a club against Russia, against Russians. But Crimean Tatars
want to live together, in peace. And we do not want to be exploited,” Lenur Usmanov emphasized.
Throughout the entire performance, the square chanted “Well done” to him.
Let us recall, on 26 February, four buses of activists in support of the pro-Russian protesters of Simferopol,
who were opposed by the Crimean Tatars, who supported the new government in Kiev, at the building of the
Supreme Council of the ARC, left Sevastopol.
Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mAavGl4Xnvs, http://fbc.net.ua/video/9361.
On 15 December 2017, another rally (100 people) took place —the rhetoric changes dramatically, now we are
talking about “ausweiss from the Russian Federation”.
Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ttytJPcZfA&feature=youtu.be.
The Mirotvorets Center asks law enforcement agencies to consider this publication on the website as a
statement about the commission of deliberate acts by this citizen against the national security of Ukraine,
peace, human security and international law, as well as other offenses.
#R148171X89A249A64A203N
19 March 2015 NATO Complain
Annex 1259
Annex 1260
Intentionally omitted
Annex 1261
Website “Mirotvorets”, page dedicated to Mr Eyvaz Umerov,
20 September 2015
Translation
17 December 2020 Ejvaz Asanovich Umerov - Mirotvorets.Center
MIROTVORETS
Center for Research of Signs of Crimes against the National Security of Ukraine, Peace, Humanity, and
the International Law
Information for law enforcement authorities and special services about pro-Russian terrorists, separatists,
mercenaries, war criminals, and murderers
Search
Ejvaz Asanovich Umerov
Date of birth: 17 September 1981
Country: Ukraine
Address: Autonomous Republic of Crimea, Sudak, 56 Alushtinskaya St., Apt. 2
Accomplice of the invaders.
Pro-Russian activist, organizer of anti-Ukrainian actions of collaborators. Deals with identification of pro-
Ukrainian Crimean Tatars and the transfer of information about them to the FSS (Federal Security Service).
Heads the Sector of Interethnic Relations at the occupation administration of Sudak.
Date of birth: 17 September 1981. Place of birth: Russia.
Code in the state register of individuals: 2984513350.
Video record of the activity
Video message to Sudak residents
http://sudak.me/news/society/krymskotatarskaja-molodezh-nash-flag-na-podorvannoi-opore-yeto-pozor.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2vE-Ww32EAQ
The Mirotvorets Center asks law enforcement agencies to consider this publication on the website as a
statement about the commission of deliberate acts by this citizen against the national security of Ukraine,
peace, human security and international law, as well as other offenses.
#R314134X89A249A64A203N
20 September 2015 NATO Complain
https://myrotvorets.center/criminal/umerov-ejvaz sanovich/
Annex 1261
Annex 1262
Donbass Info Website, “Mustafa Dzhemilev. Criminal road to
wealth. Part 2”, 4 December 2015 (excerpts)
Translation
Excerpts
Donbass Info Website
4 December 2015
Mustafa Dzhemilev. Criminal road to wealth. Part 2
donbass-info.com/content/view/25482/25493
[...]
Members of Mejlis, including Dzhemilev, acted as co-founders of Imdat Bank. The only audit of a financial
institution was held in 1995 with the involvement of independent specialists from Kharkov. And it was that
time a part of the bank’s criminal activities became known to public.
[...]
Throughout the existence of the bank, funds have been transferred to it both from foreign funds and from the
Ukrainian budget. It is worth saying separately that for the latter, this bank turned out to be a black hole. All
the funds of the UKS (Сapital Сonstruction Management) transferred into it were to be passed to individual
developers for the construction of housing for Crimean Tatars. However, most of this money went to
Dzhemilev’s Crimea Foundation, from where it went for other purposes. As a result, thousands of Crimean
Tatars lived for years without housing and did not even know what funds were allocated for them. As of 1st
January 1997, and only for one tranche, “Krym” Fund got 866 thousand hryvnias of budgetary funds on the
nod and has not returned it yet.
[...]
https://donbass-info.com/content/view/25482/25493
Annex 1262
Annex 1263
Anha, “What is the Tahrir party doing in the Shahba areas?”,
24 February 2016 (excerpts)
Translation
Excerpts
What is the Tahrir party doing in the Shahba areas?
____________________________________________________________________________
https://web.archive.org/web/20160807110604/http://hawarnews.com/ /الشھباء؟-مناطق-في-التحریر-حزب-یفعل-ما
24 February 2016
[…]
[…]
ANHA
Annex 1263
Annex 1264
Facebook page of Ms Lilya Budzhurova, post of 2 April 2016
Translation
https://www.facebook.com/lilya.takosh/posts/870614403060805
Lilya Budzhurova
2 April 2016
When will it all be over? In a while, Crimean Tatars will be caught on the streets, in public transport, in the
marketplace. Half a step is left before they will oblige us to wear a yellow arm band on our sleeve, so that it
will be easier to distinguish us from Slavs or, for example, Chechens.
The abused people must speak up. We must protest against this in every lawful way. And even if we are 100%
confident that the “world’s most fairest” court won’t take their side, we still should create precedents. Silence
is the best ground for repeated outrages.
Annex 1264
Annex 1265
Voinka village administration, Decree No. 111 “On holding events on
18 May 2016”, 29 April 2016
Annex 1266
Center for Journalist Investigations, “Now they are our children”,
24 May 2016
1
Translation
Now they are our children
https://investigator.org.ua/blogs/180390/
24 May 2016
In Crimea, there are 18 Crimean Muslims behind the bars now, 17 of them are Crimean Tatars.
I am not going to write here how the criminal cases against them were fabricated. It was written
about this more than once and obvious facts do not require confirmation. I would like to write
about something else.
Most of those who are in prison now, have minor children at home. It's scary to even imagine what
is happening in their little hearts after their bright and kind worlds, guarded by the care and protection
of their father, has collapsed in an instant. Father is no longer around. And it is not because he
"misbehaved", drank, swore and offended other people. Why, then? Because he is good? Of course,
one could reassure the child with a quote of Mahatma Gandhi that “every decent man should stay in
prison for a while”, but the child's mind is unlikely to take this paradox from the adults’ world
reasonably. But there is another and the most important point in this sad story, in my opinion. Muslim
families tend to be patriarchal (and most of those arrested are true Muslims). This means that a woman
in such a family does not earn money, since her job is to take care of her husband, children, older
relatives and the order in the house. The responsibility to maintain the family rests with the man. And
now this breadwinner has been taken away from his family and put in jail. How the children of those
arrested are supposed to live? What will they eat and what will they wear? Will they have toys, sweets,
warm winter clothes and a schoolbag? Children grow up quickly, and they need a lot for normal life,
something that simply cannot be done without. There are not so many of them, these children, who
are left today in our large Crimean Tatar family as orphans with a living father. Here is an approximate
list (it does not include those prisoners who have no children or whose children are adults): The
detained in Sevastopol in winter of 2015 and staying in prison for more than a year:
1. Ruslan Zeitullaev has 3 children,
2. Rustem Vaitov has 1 sick child,
3. Nuri Primov has 1 child,
4. Ferat Saifullaev has 3 children.
The detained under the case of 26 February and staying in prison for more than a year:
5. Ali Asanov has 4 children (the youngest child was born when the father was already in prison),
6. Ahtem Chiygoz has 1 minor child.
The detained on 11 February this year:
7. Emir-Usein Kuku has 2 children,
8. Vadim Siruk has 1 child, and another child will be born in August,
9. Enver Bekirov has 3 children,
10. Muslim Aliev has 4 children.
Annex 1266
2
The detained on 17 April:
11. Arsen Dzhepparov has 1 child.
The detained on 12 May:
12. Enver Mamutov has 7 children (the youngest daughter is under 2 months),
13. Roustem Abeltarov has 4 children,
14. Remzi Memetov has 2 children,
15. Zevri Abseitov has 4 children.
Crimean Tatars have never left a child in trouble. There are no somebody else’s children for our
people. Now they are all OUR CHILDREN. And our common national duty, our duty of Muslims is
to help raise them and give a start in their lives while their fathers are deprived of such an opportunity.
I do not know what to do yet or how it should be done, but I am sure that one-time help is not enough
in this case. The Poklonskaya’s justice is aimed to sentence 18 Muslims for lengthy prison terms.
Perhaps it makes sense to think about an Aid Fund for children of prisoners or to create some kind of
an initiative group to contact the wives and parents of prisoners in order to be able to help them on a
regular basis. We just need to find people who can suggest ideas and assume the organizational work.
Those who are eager to do it, please, respond and send your contacts by e-mail to
[email protected] or by phone +7 (978) 208-56-55. As soon as we have contacts of those
willing to help, we shall gather and decide what we can do.
Tags: Putin’s prisoners, Crimea, Crimean Tatars, Lilya Budzhurova, political prisoners, pre-trial
detention facility
Annex 1266
Annex 1267
Documents submitted to the Registry of the ICJ by the Russian
Federation in connection with Ukraine’s Request for the indication
of provisional measures and Judges’ Folder submitted by the
Russian Federation for the Hearings on Provisional Measures,
6-9 March 2017
COLLECTION OF DOCUMENTS PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED
BY THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION IN THE ICJ IN CONNECTION WITH UKRAINE’S REQUEST
FOR THE INDICATION OF PROVISIONAL MEASURES
(DOCUMENTS FROM DOSSIER FOR PROVISIONAL MEASURES HEARINGS, “DOSSIER”,
AND JUDGES’ FOLDER FOR PROVISIONAL MEASURES HEARINGS, “JUDGES’ FOLDER”)
INDEX
No. Title Source Page No.
1. Letter No. A-80-1313 of N. Vodorezov, Deputy
Plenipotentiary Representative of the President
of the Russian Federation to the Crimean Federal
District of the Russian Federation, to A.D.
Viktorov, Director of the Department for
Humanitarian Cooperation and Human Rights of
the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 26 April 2016
Dossier, Vol. I,
Annex 1, reproduced
at Judges’ Folder,
Tab 62
5
2. Excerpts from the Law of the Republic of Crimea
“On measures of social support to certain
categories of citizens and persons residing in the
Republic of Crimea”, 10 December 2014
Dossier, Vol. I,
Annex 2, Document
1
7
3. Statement delivered by the deputy Mufti of
Spiritual administration of the Republic of
Crimea and the city of Sevastopol (unofficial
translation), Mr. A.S. Ismailov, during the
Human dimension implementation meeting
(Working session 10 «Tolerance and nondiscrimination
») of the OSCE, Warsaw, 19-30
September 2016
Dossier, Vol. I,
Annex 3, Document
2
9
4. List of Crimean Media Outlets in the Crimean
Tatar and in the Ukrainian Language; Charter of
the Public Crimean Tatar TV and Radio
Broadcaster adopted by Order No. 5-r of the
State Committee on interethnic relations and
deported citizens of the Republic of Crimea of 30
June 2015
Dossier, Vol. I,
Annex 4, Documents
1, 2
12
5. Documents relating to Milli Firka, Qirim Birligi
and other Crimean Tatar organisations
(“Crimean Tatars, 21st Century Strategy – Milliy
Firqa Programme (extracts)”; List of Crimean
Tatar Non-Governmental Organizations;
“Examples of Information contained on the
website of “Milli Firka” public organization”;
Charter of the Crimean regional public
organization for social and cultural development
“Milli Firqa”, Simferopol; The goals and
objectives of the Interregional Public movement
Dossier, Vol. I,
Annex 5, Documents
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
28
1
Annex 1267
of the Crimean Tatar People “Qirim”; Charter of
the Regional public organization to Promote the
Revival of the Crimean Tatar People “Qirim
Birligi”, 9 June 2014)
6. Decree of the President of the Russian
Federation of 21 April 2014 No. 268 “On
Measures aimed at Rehabilitation of Armenian,
Bulgarian, Greek, Crimean Tatar and German
peoples and State support of their revival and
development”
Dossier, Vol. I,
Annex 8, Document
1
44
7. Material “International organizations on the
situation with the Crimean Tatars in the
‘Ukrainian’ period (1992-2014)”
Dossier, Vol. I,
Annex 9, Document
2
46
8. Documents relating to blockade of Crimea
(“Trade blockade? Ukrainian activists block
food trucks on checkpoints to Crimea”, Russia
Today, 20 September 2015; Decree No. 1035 of
the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, 16
December 2015 on restriction of supply of
certain goods (works, services) from the
temporarily occupied territory to the other
territory of Ukraine and/or from the other
territory of Ukraine to the temporarily occupied
territory, and the appended list of embargoed
basic food products; “The Right Sector Decided
to Commence the “Electric Power Blockade” of
Crimea”, RIA Crimea, 12 October 2015; “Two
Line Poles Leading to Crimea Were Blown Up
Near Kherson”, RIA Crimea, 20 October 2015;
“Destruction of the Remaining Electric Power
Line Poles in Ukraine Led to Blackout in
Crimea”, RBC, 22 November 2015; “Ukraine
Gave Some Light to Crimea”, RIA, 8 December
2015; “Aksyonov Called the Blasting of the Pole
of Electric Power Supply Line in Kherson
Region A Terrorist Attack”, Lenta.ru, 31
December 2015)
Dossier, Vol. I,
Annex 10,
Documents 3, 5, 10,
11, 12, 14, 15
63
9. Declaration on the National Sovereignty of the
Crimean Tatar people, 28 June 1991; Address of
Qurultay to the Crimean Tatar People, 29 June
1991
Dossier, Vol. III.2,
Annex 1
77
10. Ruling of the Supreme Council of Crimea “On
the gathering (Qurultay) of the Crimean Tatar
representatives”, 29 July 1991 (extract)
Dossier, Vol. III.2,
Annex 5
79
11. Statement of the Presidium of the Mejlis “On the
situation in Crimea”, 19 February 1992 (extracts)
Dossier, Vol. III.2,
Annex 6
80
2
Annex 1267
12. Press reports: the events in Krasniy Ray and
Alushta, 1992
Dossier Vol. III.2,
Annex 10
81
13. Supreme Council of the Republic of Crimea,
Minutes of the Plenary Meeting No. 19 of the
Ninth Session of the First Convocation. 8
October 1992 (extracts)
Dossier Vol. III.2,
Annex 11
84
14. Judgment of the Zheleznodorozhniy District
Court of Simferopol in the case of Zair
Sitbellyalovich Smedlyaev, 30 January 2012
(extracts)
Dossier Vol. III.2,
Annex 12
87
15. Press reports: events around the Svyato-
Uspenskiy Monastery in Bakhchisaray
Dossier Vol. III.2,
Annex 13
89
16. Press reports: events on the Ay-Petri mountain,
2007
Dossier Vol. III.2,
Annex 14
97
17. Press reports: events around the Bakhchisaray
Central Market, 2006
Dossier Vol. III.2,
Annex 15
105
18. Information Bulletin of the National Movement
of Crimean Tatars “Areket”, Statement of the
Informational Working Group, 20 February
1998 (extracts)
Dossier, Vol. III.2,
Annex 16
111
19. Requests of Mr Oleg Rodivilov, Deputy of the
Verkhovnaya Rada of the Autonomous Republic
of Crimea, 21 June 2006 and 19 November 2007
Dossier, Vol. III.2,
Annex 19
112
20. Judgment of the Central District Court of
Simferopol in the case of Mr Eskender Nebiev,
12 October 2015; Judgement of the Central
District Court of Simferopol in the case of Mr
Talyat Yunusov, 28 December 2015
Dossier, Vol. III.2,
Annex 21
115
21. Judgment of the Armyansk City Court in the case
of Mr Tair Smedlyaev, 7 December 2015;
Judgment of the Armyansk City Court in the case
of Mr Edem Osmanov, 10 December 2015
Dossier, Vol. III.2,
Annex 23
127
22. “Bakharev: Blackout Caused Over a Billion in
Damages to Simferopol Enterprises”, RIA
Novosti Krym, 11 May 2016
Dossier, Vol. III.2,
Annex 25
144
23. Transcript of interviews with Mr Lenur Islyamov
(extracts)
Dossier Vol. III.2,
Annex 27
145
24. Appeal from the representatives of 5 Crimean
Tatar organizations to the Office of the
Prosecutor of the Republic of Crimea, doc. no.
VGL-56-16, 2 February 2016
Dossier, Vol. III.2,
Annex 29
146
3
Annex 1267
25. “Lentun Bezaziyev: Majlis has Never Been
Engaged in Creation”, Krymskaya Pravda, 13
March 2013
Dossier, Vol III.2,
Annex 30
148
26. “Crimean blockade organizer launches guerrilla
‘Tatar battalion’ with ‘Turkish help’”, RT News,
27 December 2015
Dossier, Vol. III.2,
Annex 31
158
27. “Poroshenko said that the aim of the blockade is
the return of Crimea to Ukraine”, Regnum, 22
September 2015
Judges’ Folder, Tab
31
166
28. Positive statements of Crimean Tatars about the
situation in Crimea after the reunification with
the Russian Federation
Judges’ Folder, Tab
40
167
29. Quotes of Crimean Tatars about the Situation in
(translation and original)
Judges’ Folder, Tab
41
171
30. Statements made by deputy mufti of Crimea A.
Ismailov during the OSCE Human dimension
implementation meeting (Warsaw, 19-30
September 2016)
Judges’ Folder, Tab
42
177
31. Decree of the Supreme Council of the Crimean
ASSR, 8 October 1992
Judges’ Folder, Tab
54
180
32. “Meeting of President of Ukraine L.M.
Kravchuk with Chairman of the Supreme
Council of the Republic of Crimea N.V.
Bagrov”, Krymskiye izvestia No. 201, 14
October 1992
Judges’ Folder, Tab
55
183
33. “The Ministry of Education of Crimea pays
particular attention to establishment of
conditions for studying of native languages”,
Ministry of Education, Science and Youth of the
Republic of Crimea, 2 March 2017
Judges’ Folder, Tab
65, Document 2
185
4
Annex 1267
Stat ments ma e by d put muft of C a A I mai ov
duri g e OS E Human i en i mplemen
m et n
Fol
D cr f the Suprem Counc of the SR 8
O b 19 2
Fol
t s f r . K k
an Sup C of
Crim a
T inis ry o Education of Cr m pay
a e tion to esta
n g ge , y S nce a
out of t Repu 01
The Right Sector Decided to Commence the "Electric Power Blockade" of Crimea
Crimea.ria.ru
12:4112.10.2015
(updated: 01:06 10.11.2015)
86002
The website of the Ukrainian extremist organization "The Right Sector" says that the electric
power supply line that was damaged in Kherson Region will not be repaired. The repair
works by Dneprenergo have been blocked with the participation of activists from Azov
battalion and Majlis of the Crimean Tatar People.
SIMFEROPOL, 12 Oct - RIA Novosti (Crimea). Extremists from The Right Sector organization
supported the activists of Azov battalion and members of the Majlis of the Crimean Tatar
People that is not registered in Russia who obstruct the repairs of the electric power line
going from Ukraine to Crimea that was damaged in Kherson Region. According to the
communication published at the website of the organization, the specialists from
Dneprenergo have recently arrived to repair the damaged electric power line, however, they
were unable to conduct the repair works because the activists who were also involved in the
food blockade of Crimea did not allow them to commence the works.
Ukrenergo: Crimea is receiving 200 Mega Watts less that needed »
The words of deputy head of the operative staff of civil blockade of Crimea lzet Gdanov were
published at the website of the Right Sector: "The electric power supply, as well as supply of
consumer goods to Crimea need to be terminated. Electric power is a commodity too. Here,
the activists saw that repairs are underway and asked the workers to stop".
Egorov: in case of electric power blockade, emergency outages will begin in Crimea »
According to the Right Sector, at present, the repair works of the electric power line have
been fully suspended, activists are keeping the watch by the damaged line pole.
Transport blockade of Crimea: the planes are not flying, the trains are not moving »
67
Annex 1267
The regional authorities believe that, among others, Mustafa Dzhemilev - the head of Majlis of the
Crimean Tatar People, which has not been registered in Russia, is responsible for the energy blockade
of Crimea. Together with another Maj I is leader- Refat Chubarov - he previously organized the food
blockade of Crimea and called for cessation of electric power supply of Crimea. Criminal proceedings
were initiated against both in the Russian Federation, 5-year bans on their entry in Russia have been
introduced in connection with extremist statements.
According to the Prosecutor of the Republic of Crimea Natalia Poklonskaya, arrest warrants will be
issued against the organizers of the electric power blockade of Crimea that inflicted significant
damage on the peninsula, and their property in Russia will be arrested. The Crimean Directorate of
the Federal Security Service, having reviewed the materials provided by the Crimean Prosecutor's
Office, initiated criminal proceedings under Article 281(2) of the Criminal Code of the RF (subversive
activity), which is punishable by up to 20 years of imprisonment.
On Monday, Chubarov stated that the supporters of the blockade of Crimea gave consent to supply
of electric power via one of the lines - Kakhovka-Titan. But the members of another organization -
The Rights Sector - interfered who said that late at night on Sunday they disrupted the attempts of
the work brigades to partially restore the electric power supply. Eventually, the electric power supply
was resumed late at night on Monday.
The head of State Committee for inter-ethnic Relations and Deported Individuals of the Crimean
government Zaur Smirnov told RIA Novosti that the position of Majlis leaders in the past few days
does not release them from responsibility for electric power blockade of the peninsula.
"The law enforcement authorities have taken all necessary steps and confirmed the clear connection
between Majlis and the electric power blockade. The solicitations to connect one of the electric
power supply lines by no means mitigate the actions of the officers of security agencies aimed at
establishing justice and identification of those guilty in the carrying out of the electric power
blockade, nor does it change the condemnation of their actions by the Crimean residents," said
Smirnov.
Crimean news in details - at crimea.ria.ru>>
Power Bridge from Kuban to Crimea
3/3
74
Annex 1267
77
Annex 1267
78
Annex 1267
79
Annex 1267
80
Annex 1267
81
Annex 1267
82
Annex 1267
83
Annex 1267
84
Annex 1267
85
Annex 1267
86
Annex 1267
87
Annex 1267
88
Annex 1267
89
Annex 1267
90
Annex 1267
91
Annex 1267
92
Annex 1267
93
Annex 1267
94
Annex 1267
95
Annex 1267
96
Annex 1267
97
Annex 1267
98
Annex 1267
99
Annex 1267
100
Annex 1267
101
Annex 1267
102
Annex 1267
103
Annex 1267
104
Annex 1267
105
Annex 1267
106
Annex 1267
107
Annex 1267
108
Annex 1267
109
Annex 1267
110
Annex 1267
111
Annex 1267
112
Annex 1267
113
Annex 1267
114
Annex 1267
115
Annex 1267
116
Annex 1267
117
Annex 1267
118
Annex 1267
119
Annex 1267
120
Annex 1267
121
Annex 1267
122
Annex 1267
123
Annex 1267
124
Annex 1267
125
Annex 1267
126
Annex 1267
127
Annex 1267
128
Annex 1267
129
Annex 1267
130
Annex 1267
131
Annex 1267
132
Annex 1267
133
Annex 1267
134
Annex 1267
135
Annex 1267
136
Annex 1267
137
Annex 1267
138
Annex 1267
139
Annex 1267
140
Annex 1267
141
Annex 1267
142
Annex 1267
143
Annex 1267
144
Annex 1267
145
An nex 1267
146
Annex 1267
147
Annex 1267
148
Annex 1267
149
Annex 1267
150
Annex 1267
151
Annex 1267
152
Annex 1267
153
Annex 1267
154
Annex 1267
155
Annex 1267
156
Annex 1267
157
Annex 1267
158
Annex 1267
159
Annex 1267
160
Annex 1267
161
Annex 1267
162
Annex 1267
163
Annex 1267
164
Annex 1267
165
Annex 1267
Unofficial translation
The ministry of education of Crimea pays particular attention to establishment of
conditions for studying of native languages1
The Ministry of Education of Crimea pays particular
attention to creating conditions for studying native languages.
This statement is made by the Minister of education, science and
youth of the Republic of Crimea in the follow-up to the Day of
native language. Thus, the Ministry of Education, Science and Youth organizes and carries out
regular events, which contribute to the promotion of native languages, respect for the languages
and culture of the peoples of the Republic of Crimea and support of talented children.
„Through creating conditions for the promotion, preservation and study of native languages
by schoolchildren of the Republic of Crimea we shape the historical memory and nurture
patriotism“, N.Goncharova said.
According to N.Goncharova, in the framework of celebration of the International Day of
“ of the city of Simferopol a
creative competition „Language – the soul of the nation“ was held, this year devoted to the 200
anniversary of the birthday of the famous painter, collector and philanthropist I.Aivasowsky.
Representatives of 6 peoples of the Russian Federation living in Crimea participated in this
event. Children recited poems by S.Marshak, A.Pushkin, E.Schemyi-zade, Lesya Ukrainka,
M.Bogdanovich, Shakir Selim, Georgius Afanis, Ovanes Tumanyan, Cherkeza Ali and other
poets in the Armenian, Bulgarian, Greek, Crimean Tatar, Russian and Ukrainian languages. In
the nomination „The competition of rhetoric „Artist in words“ senior high school students
demonstrated their skills on working with the audience on the topic „How do you understand the
rapprochement of cultures?“
(on the International decade of the rapprochement of cultures (2013-2022)). Almost 300 pupils
of Crimean general education institutions participated in this event.
In the near future the 14th Republican festival of pupils’ creativity in the Crimean Tatar
language „Native language is priceless, and spiritual wealth of the nation is inexhaustible” will
1 http://monm.rk.gov.ru/rus/index.htm/news/355733.htm
185
Annex 1267
take place. A significant number of children, studying their native languages participate in this
type of events.
N.Goncharova has also explained that in the 2016/2017 school year 556 general education
institutions function in the Republic of Crimea, where 192,3 thousand children study. Out of this
number 186,5 thousand pupils receive education in the Russian language (96,9% of the total
number), 5,4 thousand receive education in the Crimean Tatar language (3% of the total number)
and 371 receive education in the Ukrainian language (0,1 %).
There are 15 educational organizations that teach in Crimean-Tatar (3651 pupils in 201
classes), one teaches in Ukrainian (132 pupils in 9 classes) – the Municipal budgetary general
In addition to this, general educational institutions with Russian language of education
include classes with Ukrainian language of education (19 classes, 239 pupils in 12 schools) and
with the Crimean Tatar language of education (137 classes, 1730 pupils in 37 schools,).
Schools of Crimea also provide an opportunity to learn and study native languages in
different forms (e.g. as a subject, as an additional course, in non-school classes): in one of these
forms the Crimean Tatar language is studied by 19254 pupils, the Ukrainian language - by
12892, Armenian - by 54, Bulgarian – by 62, Greek – by 136, German – by 56.
The study of native language in general educational institutions with education in native
language is provided 3-5 hours per week, in schools with Russian language of education – 2-3
hours per week. Such a time-table enables pupils to study their native language, literature,
culture and history.
In 2015 the Ministry of Education prepared exemplary programs „Crimean Tatar language
(mother tongue)“, „Crimean Tatar language (non-mother tongue)“, „Crimean Tatar literature”,
“Ukrainian language (mother tongue), “Ukrainian language” (non-mother tongue) and
„Ukrainian literature” for preschool and general education schools. According to the decision of
the Federal educational and methodological unit on general education of the Ministry of
Education and S
are approved and included into the list of exemplary general education programs of the Ministry
of Education and Science of the Russian Federation.
In 2015-2016 the Ministry organized and conducted activities on translation, editing,
printing, publication and supply of 66 publications, including in the Crimean Tatar language – 61
thousand copies (in 2015 – 45 publications, in 2016 –
21 publications). Among them were translated textbooks on subjects from 1 to 9 grades:
geography, history, biology, music etc. Exemplary programs on „Crimean Tatar language“
186
Annex 1267
(mother tongue), „Crimean Tatar literature“, „Crimean Tatar language“ (non-mother tongue) and
Crimean Tatar – Russian school vocabulary“.
In accordance with the number of enrolled pupils these textbooks are distributed in schools
and classes with Crimean Tatar language of education. The budget of the Republic of Crimea
provides 46,7 million of rubles for these activities.
In the Crimean Federal University named after V. Vernadsky and in the Crimean
engineering and pedagogical university the following courses are taught: „Ukrainian language“,
“Crimean Tatar language”.
On the basis of the Crimean engineering and pedagogical university there is a scientific and
research Institute of Crimean Tatar philology, history and culture of the peoples of Crimea.
Refresher courses for teachers of languages, who teach native languages, are held on a
regular basis.
In 2016 the Ministry of Education, Science and Youth organized for the first time training
for teachers who teach the Armenian, Bulgarian, Greek and Crimean Tatar languages according
to the program “Theory and methods of teaching of native languages“.
187
Annex 1267
Annex 1269
Website “Mirotvorets“, page dedicated to ,
4 January 2018
Annex 1270
Website of the Mejlis, “Appeal of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar
People“, 12 March 2018
1
Translation
News
qtmm.org/новости/5869-обращение-меджлиса-крымскотатарского-народа
Appeal of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People dated 12 March 2018.
At the end of February and in the course of March 2014 the Russian Federation, in violation of all rules of
international law and the existing agreements with Ukraine, carried out a military invasion of the territory of
sovereign Ukraine and occupied a part of its territory – the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of
Sevastopol.
The Russian occupiers who invaded Crimea, at gunpoint and with the direct participation of the officers of
the Federal Security Service (FSS) and other special services of Russia, simulated a “referendum” on 16
March 2014, to which they managed to drive only 34% of Crimean voters.
The Crimean Tatar people, having supported the decision of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People,
completely boycotted the illegal “referendum” that was simulated by the Russian occupiers at that time.
None of the tricks of the Russian occupiers around the fantastic “referendum results” put down by them
could deceive the international community.
Non-recognition of the legitimacy of the illegal annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation and
condemnation of the actions of the Russian aggressor with call for the restoration of the territorial integrity of
Ukraine are reflected in the resolutions of the General Assembly of the United Nations, the European Union,
the Council of Europe, OSCE, NATO and other international organisations as well as in the resolutions of
the absolute majority of the national governments of the countries which are members of the UN.
The said resolutions also contain demands to Russia, the occupying country, to stop the persecutions and
repressions against the Crimean Tatar people, the native people of Crimea, including numerous illegal
arrests, abductions, murders, torture and movement of people as well as the persecutions against all residents
of the peninsula who do not accept the temporary occupation of Crimea by Russia.
The Russian Federation is still able to openly ignore the decisions of international organisations, including
also the decision of the UN International Court of Justice to lift the ban on the activities of the Mejlis of the
Crimean Tatar People and to lift the ban on Crimean Tatar leaders and activists from entering home, to
Crimea.
But the time is already relentlessly approaching when Russia, as a result of economic, political and
civilizational isolation, will be forced to return to the framework of international law, to liberate Crimea and
the other territories of Ukraine that have been occupied by it.
Sensing the inevitability of punishment for the international crimes they have committed and are committing
against Ukraine and against the Crimean Tatar people, Putin and the people around him are trying to involve
as many civilians, residents of Crimea, as possible in the crimes that they are committing.
That is why the Russian authorities, continuing to blatantly violate the UN Charter and the fundamental rules
of international law, are planning to hold elections for the President of the Russian Federation in the
temporarily occupied territory of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol on 18
March 2018.
Holding of elections for the President of the Russian Federation in the temporarily occupied territory of
Crimea is illegal and, accordingly, the citizens who are directly involved in the preparation and holding of
elections will be considered to have violated the Ukrainian legislation in force.
The Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People notes the unprecedented pressure and direct threats against Crimean
Tatars from the side of the Russian occupiers and local collaborators aimed at forcing them to participate in
Annex 1270
2
the illegal elections.
Prominent sections of the population – clergy, teachers, doctors, businessmen, employees of public utility
companies and organisations, students, athletes, retirees – find themselves under severe moral and
psychological blackmail.
At the same time, the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People, being in constant and close interaction with
compatriots living in all cities and districts of Crimea, notes that the absolute majority of Crimean Tatars are
full of dignity and courage not to succumb to blackmail and threats from the Russian occupiers.
Crimean Tatars demonstrate adherence to the principles of international law and the firmness of their
position in terms of assessing the Russian occupation of Crimea, show solidarity with all Crimean political
prisoners and express unity with the families of their compatriots killed and forcibly abducted.
Thus, Crimean Tatars will not take part in the illegal elections on 18 March 2018, which will be held by the
Russian occupiers in the temporarily occupied Crimea.
Supporting the Crimean Tatar people as well as the other residents of Crimea, regardless of nationality and
religion, in their non-participation in the illegal elections on 18 March 2018, which will be held by the
Russian Federation, the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People will continue to take all measures to ensure the
state sovereignty of Ukraine over the Crimean peninsula and restore the status of Crimea on the basis of the
right of the Crimean Tatar people to self-determination as an indigenous people of Ukraine.
Adopted under the procedure of the emergency mode of operation
of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People,
which was introduced on 26 April 2016.
Refat Chubarov,
Chairman of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People,
Kiev, 11 March 2018
Annex 1270
Annex 1271
Hizb ut-Tahrir in Ukraine, Fazyl Amzaev, Hizb ut-Tahrir’s
activities in non-Muslim countries: goals and methods,
16 August 2019
(excerpts)
1
Translation
Excerpts
Hizb ut-Tahrir’s Activities in Non-Muslim Countries: Goals and Methods
16 AUGUST 2019
I, Fazyl Nedimovich Amzaev, am the Head of the Information Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir in Ukraine.
[…]
Page 3
Beyond the Islamic world (in the so-called “countries outside the Majal” according to Hizb ut-Tahrir’s
terminology), in Europe, America, Russia, Ukraine, Australia, and other non-Muslim countries, Hizb ut-Tahrir
conducts outreach activities focused on spreading the ideas of Islam among Muslims and non-Muslims.
[…]
Hizb ut-Tahrir’s activities beyond the Islamic world (in the so-called “countries outside the Majal”)
[…]
Page 4
Returning to Hizb ut-Tahrir’s activities in non-Muslim counties, it should be mentioned that:
The fact that the party is not trying to establish a Caliphate in non-Muslim countries does not mean that our
organization has nothing to do in these countries.
Islam requires Muslims – irrespective of whether the Islamic State exists or not or whether the country in
which they live is Muslim or not – to spread the light of their religion in the society in which they live. Islam
provides that care should be taken of society and individuals regardless of whether the Islamic State exists or
not.
As part of this duty, Hizb ut-Tahrir has adopted the following goals in non-Muslim countries:
1. The first area is to enlighten the Muslims of these countries with Islam so that they can be formed and
follow the rules and principles of Islam.
Given the existing historical background, the level of enlightenment about the rules and principles of Islam
among Muslims living in non-Muslim counties is low. This affects their way of life, both in personal and
public fields. Eventually, according to Islam, this state of things leads Muslims to hardship in this life and to
punishment in the afterlife.
All this requires Muslims to study the fundamentals of Islamic beliefs and religious solutions stemming
therefrom that Muslims should follow in their everyday life.
2. The second area of Hizb ut-Tahrir’s activities includes work with non-Muslims.
Hizb ut-Tahrir has taken on the task of extending the light of Islam to non-Muslims.
Annex 1271
2
Hizb ut-Tahrir urges non-Muslims to join Islam as a universal human doctrine and an all-encompassing
worldview. When working with non-Muslims, we show that numerous stereotypes about Islam, its laws, and
Muslims are unsubstantiated. By refuting such false information about Islam, we adduce examples of the
wonderful centuries-old co-existence of various ethnicities and denominations in the shade of Islamic laws,
and examples of how different problems have been successfully solved in Islamic practice based on the Quran
and Sunnah.
In particular, in pursuance of the two goals above, the Ukrainian branch of Hizb ut-Tahrir has organised a
number of outreach campaigns over more than 20 years of its operation in the territory of Ukraine: the
importance of Islamic rule; the reasons behind the global financial crisis and its solution from the point of view
of Islam; the Islam’s view on the so-called “ethnic and religious minorities”; the distribution of rights and
obligations between men and women; the difference between culture and tangible objects of civilisations; the
prohibition of accepting an alien culture by Muslims and the permissibility of accepting objects of civilization
that do not contradict Islam; the importance of raising children in keeping with the Islamic worldview and the
responsibility of parents and teachers for this.
This is just a very brief list of outreach campaigns that our organisation has held. Hizb ut-Tahrir is known in
Ukraine and Crimea for its conferences, classes in mosques, press conferences, rallies, peaceful processions,
radio and television appearances, and other public outreach campaigns.
This is a brief overview of Hizb ut-Tahrir’s outreach activities in non-Muslim counties.
Fazyl Amzaev
Head of the Information Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir in Ukraine
13 August 2019
Annex 1271
Annex 1272
Crimean Digest, No. 3, September 2020
Annex 1273
Official website of the International Festival Great Russian Word,
“Overview on the International Festival GREAT RUSSIAN WORD”,
14 February 2020
1
Translation
Overview on the International Festival GREAT RUSSIAN WORD
mfvrs.org/content/obzornaya_informatsiya
(Logo) International Festival Great Russian Word
Since 2007, the International Festival of Russian, Slavic culture GREAT RUSSIAN WORD has been
annually held in Crimea, which has become a humanitarian project of the Republic of Crimea. The
festival is held under the auspices of the State Council of the Republic of Crimea and the Council of
Ministers of the Republic of Crimea with the support of government bodies of the Russian Federation,
Ukraine (until 2014), the Moscow Government, Russkiy Mir Foundation.
The goals and objectives of the Festival are aimed at developing Russian culture, strengthening the position
of the Russian language, and developing international cooperation in the humanitarian sphere.
Within the framework of the events of the Festival in Crimea, concerts, art and educational programs, public
forums, scientific conferences, creative meetings, literature and church-pedagogical readings are traditionally
held, in these events take part Crimean, Ukrainian and Russian figures of culture, science, education,
representatives of the Orthodox clergy, social and political organizations, government bodies of Ukraine and
the Russian Federation.
Traditionally, delegations from the regions of the Russian Federation, Ukraine and other countries participate
in the events of the Festival. During the existence of the Festival, prominent Russian and Ukrainian public
and political figures have become its special guests. Greetings to the organizers and participants of the
Festival were sent by the leaders of the Russian Federation and Ukraine.
The leadership of the Republic of Crimea pays great attention to the organization of the festival of
Russian, Slavic culture at a high international level.
Festival events are held in a number of cities and regions of the Republic of Crimea. In accordance with the
tasks set for the festival, the Organizing Committee of the next International Festival GREAT RUSSIAN
WORD is approved annually by the Decision of the State Council of the Republic of Crimea, the Committee
develops and adopts the festival program.
The opening ceremony of the VIII International Festival GREAT RUSSIAN WORD, which took place
on 6 June 2014 in Yalta, in the concert hall Yubileiniy, was attended by over 150 special guests, 2
thousand residents and guests of Crimea. More than 10 thousand people took part in the events of the
VIII Festival. Among them: representatives of the Russian Presidential Executive Office, deputies of the
Federation Council and the State Duma of the Russian Federation, heads of the legislative assemblies of the
regions of Russia, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, the Government of Moscow,
governors and heads of a number of regions of the Russian Federation, including Moscow, Rostov, Kursk,
Bryansk, Samara, Vladimir Regions, Krasnodar Territory and the Chechen Republic, the State of Eritrea.
On 7 June, the VIII International Social and Political Forum Interaction-2014 (Vzaimodeystvie-2014)
was held in the Livadia Palace-Museum in Yalta, the forum was attended by public and political figures,
political experts, as well as representatives of cultural, educational and scientific circles. Chairman of the
State Council of the Republic of Crimea Vladimir Konstantinov made a report at the forum.
Annex 1273
Annex 1274
Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir in Wilayah, “Neither America, nor
Russia, nor Europe, Trusting these Kuffar is a Political and Military
Suicide!”, 29 February 2020
Annex 1275
Statement of the Chairman of the Mejlis on the possibility of water
supply to Crimea, 6 March 2020
Translation
Translated from Ukrainian
News
qtmm.org/новости/6222-заява-голови-меджлісу-кримськотатарського-народу
Statement of the Chairman of the Mejlis on the possibility of water supply to Crimea
6 March 2020
The scandalous statement of the newly elected Prime Minister Denis Shmygal about the possibility of water
supply through the North Crimean Canal to temporarily occupied Crimea, made by him in the midst of
intensified repressions in Crimea and persecution of Crimean Tatars and ethnic Ukrainians by the Russian
occupiers, was a vile blow in the back of those who has not accepted the occupation of Crimea and remain
loyal to the Ukrainian state.
The situation has not changed by the urgent explanation of Prime Minister Denis Shmygal that he later
posted on his Facebook page.
It should also be honestly noted that a number of recent capitulation statements on Crimea by certain
Ukrainian politicians and officials have disoriented international organizations and international partners
seeking to support Ukraine in restoring its territorial integrity within internationally recognized borders,
including the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the City of Sevastopol.
At the same time, attempts to cover up such “initiatives” with the alleged concern for the citizens of Ukraine
who live in Russia-occupied Crimea are absolutely unacceptable.
In fact, any concessions to Russia by Ukraine or its international partners only strengthen the Kremlin’s
repressive policy against Ukrainian citizens living in temporarily occupied Crimea, primarily against the
Crimean Tatar people.
Restoring the water supply to Crimea through the North Crimean Canal is necessary for Moscow to
strengthen and expand the Russian military presence in Crimea it occupies, as well as to set up new
settlements to colonize the occupied peninsula by Russian citizens, who settle in order to displace the
indigenous people of Crimea – Crimean Tatars and ethnic Ukrainians.
It is obvious that a radical breakthrough in restoring Ukraine’s territorial integrity and protecting the state
sovereignty of Ukraine requires the maximum mobilization of Ukrainian society.
In order to consolidate, both inside Ukraine and at the international level, all efforts aimed at the soonest
deoccupation of Crimea and restoration of the state sovereignty of Ukraine over Crimea, the Mejlis of the
Crimean Tatar People calls the Prime Minister of Ukraine Denis Shmygal and the newly appointed Cabinet
of Ministers of Ukraine, as well as all political and public organizations of Ukraine, for constant
consultations and interaction with the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People.
Refat Chubarov,
Chairman of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People,
Kiev - New York (UN Security Council),
6 March 2020
Annex 1275
Annex 1276
Supreme Court of the Republic of Crimea official website,
“Supreme Court of the Republic of Crimea reads out the sentence
to L.E. Islyamov”, 10 December 2020
(excerpts)
Annex 1277
Mustafa Dzhemilev Talks, Reports at sessions and conferences of
Qurultay of the Crimean Tatar People 1991-2001, Simferopol, Odzhak,
2001 (excerpts)
Translation
Excerpts
Mustafa Dzhemilev Talks
Reports at sessions and conferences of
Qurultay of the Crimean Tatar People
1991-2001
Simferopol, “Odzhak” 2001
[…]
Page 9
At the first stage, the electors were elected at general meetings at the place of residence of Crimean Tatars,
who at the second stage at their conferences (district, city, regional or republican) elected delegates to the
Congress. Quotas were established - 1 elector from 30 people of the Crimean Tatar population, 1 delegate to
the Congress - from 1,000 people (33-34 electors). Every Crimean Tatar man or woman who has reached the
age of 18 had the right to participate in the elections. The electors were elected by open (at the discretion of
the meeting - by secret) voting, and the delegates to the Congress - by secret voting at the conference.
[…]
Page 10
The Qurultay was opposed by a small group of activists of the National Movement, united in a group led by
Yuri Osmanov and called the National Movement of Crimean Tatars (NMCT). This group conducted an
intensive campaign at the local level, calling on compatriots to sabotage the election of delegates.
The Organizing Committee did not have reliable statistical data on the number of Crimean Tatars (according
to official data, there were 272 thousand Crimean Tatar people, although it was assumed that this number
was significantly underestimated).
[...]
Annex 1277
Annex 1278
Wikipedia, “Noman Ḉelebicihan”, 4 March 2021
Annex 1279
Wikipedia in Russian, “Qurultay of the Crimean Tatar People”,
as at 4 March 2021
(excerpts)
Translation
Excerpts
4 March 2021
Wikipedia
Qurultay of the Crimean Tatar People
[…]
First Qurultay
The February Revolution of 1917 in Russia led to the activation of national movements throughout the
country. On 25 March 1917, the All-Crimean Muslim Congress was convened in Simferopol. The congress
elected the Provisional Crimean-Muslim Executive Committee (Musispolkom), the head of which was
Noman Ḉelebicihan (Çelebi Çelebiev).
Members of the Qurultay of 1917.
On 1-2 October 1917 (according to the Julian calendar), at a congress of representatives of Crimean Tatar
organizations convened by the Musispolkom, it was decided that in the current political situation, the
question of the further fate of Crimea should be decided by the Qurultay of the Crimean Tatar People. The
elections of delegates took place on 17 (30) November. Qurultay was opened on 26 November (9 December)
in the Khan’s Palace (Bakhchisaray). It assumed all the powers of the Muslim Executive Committee,
proclaimed the creation of the Crimean People’s Republic, adopted its Constitution and state symbols, after
which it declared itself the parliament of the Crimean People’s Republic. Noman Ḉelebicihan headed the
government.
[…]
Annex 1279
Annex 1280
Table of contradictions in the evidence presented by Ukraine in
connection with the scuffle that occurred at the conference in
Simferopol on 17 January 2015
1
Table of contradictions in the evidence presented by Ukraine
in connection with the scuffle that occurred at the conference in Simferopol on 17 January 2015
No. Memorial of Ukraine
Report of the Human
Rights Assessment Mission
on Crimea
(Annex 812 to the Memorial
of Ukraine)
Bariiev Statement
(Annex 15 to the Memorial
of Ukraine)
Video
(Annex 1101 to the Memorial of
Ukraine)
Comments
1
Ukraine’s Memorial states
that (para. 491):
“A conference organized by
the Committee in a private
hotel a month later was
delayed when a group of
approximately 20 thugs
sought to physically block
the participants from taking
their seats.”
Report states that (para. 135):
“On 17 January 2015, the
organizers finally held a
human rights conference, at
which their Committee
discussed issues of concern
and adopted decisions – then
transmitting their
conclusions to the Ukrainian
and Turkish governments, as
well as the UN Secretary-
General.”
-------- ------
(1) In its Memorial Ukraine
claims that the conference was
delayed. Ukraine blames it on the
Russian authorities, which,
according to Ukraine,
discriminate against Crimean
Tatars and suppress their right to
peaceful assembly.
(2) At the same time the Report
states the opposite: the conference
was held, “…Committee
discussed issues of concern and
adopted decisions.” The Report
says nothing about disrupting or
delaying the conference.
(3) It is obvious that Ukraine in its
Memorial deliberately
exaggerates the nature and
significance of the scuffle that
took place at the conference.
(4) A closer analysis of the video
presented by Ukraine shows that
the scuffle at the conference took
place between its participants and
was probably the result of the
Annex 1280
2
improper organization of the
conference: too many participants
for such a small room; illconceived
registration system; the
lack of minimum security.
2
Ukraine’s Memorial states
that (para. 491):
“…approximately 20 thugs
sought to physically block
the participants from taking
their seats.”
--------
Bariiev claims in his
statement that (para. 18):
“…a group of 30-40
athletic young men in
track suits with hoods
appeared.”
(1) The video constantly shows
the same two young men in red
and blue sports jackets with
hoods.
(2) The video shows the moment
when a woman leads these two
young men out of the hall with
the words:
“boys, I won't let you in without
registration”.
[0:00:49-0:00:53].
(3) The video also shows
women lead out other young
men who are not registered.
[0:00:30-0:00:40]
[0:01:03-0:01:12]
(4) At the same time, it is
obvious that all these persons
are familiar with participants of
the conference and no one
considers them as “thugs”.
(5) The video also shows a
conversation between a young
man and an older man. Both
appear to be Crimean Tatars and
familiar with each other, as the
elderly man calls the other by
the name. During the
(1) Ukraine deliberately misleads
the Court about the nature of the
events that took place at the
conference. The video that was
presented by Ukraine shows that:
(i) The young men, whom
Ukraine calls “thugs” in its
Memorial, were familiar with the
participants of the conference,
talked with them.
(ii) None of the conference
participants considered these
young men as “thugs”. The
women who took these persons
out of the hall addressed them
with the words: “boys, I won't let
you in without registration”.
(iii) Most of the order violators, if
not all of them, were the
participants of the conference.
Annex 1280
3
conversation the young man
says the following:
“There is no need here to pit
us, the youth, the Crimean
Tatars, against those whom we
are living with. Why are you
doing all this? Why are you
doing all this?”
[0:00:09-0:00:29]
(6) The video also shows a
scene where one of the
organizers of the conference
says:
“They came to our conference.
They are our guests. Let them
stay”
[0:01:35-0:01:40]
(7) Voice-over says:
“we can't go inside for two
hours.”
[0:01:40-0:01:42]
3
Ukraine’s Memorial states
that (para. 491):
“Although the police were
present in numbers, they
did nothing to restore order
until they realized that their
complicity in the disruption
was being filmed by
activists.”
--------
Bariiev claims in his
statement that (paras. 18-
19):
(i) “When the Committee
members began to gather in
the hotel’s conference room
on the appointed day, a
large number of local
police and a group of 30-40
athletic young men in track
suits with hoods
appeared.”
(1) Bariiev’s allegations that the
police were present at the
conference from the very
beginning contradict the video.
(2) The first seconds of the
video show the area adjacent to
the hotel. There are no police
officers or police cars in this
footage.
[0:00:00-0:00:05]
(1) The role of the Russian police,
contrary to what Ukraine claims,
was to restore order and ensure
the safety of the conference
participants.
(2) The police were not present at
the conference from the very
beginning. It was called after the
scuffle started.
(3) Arriving at the conference, the
police restored order, and then
Annex 1280
4
(ii) “Until that point, the
police had ignored my
requests to remove from the
room the unidentified men
who were trying to prevent
the gathering from taking
place. The police helped the
men enter the conference
room and then refused to
get involved.”
(iii) “I understood that the
police presence had
nothing to do with
maintaining public order.
They were just waiting for
one or more Crimean
Tatars at the conference to
react to provocation by the
unidentified men, which
would have given them
cause to detain and arrest
Crimean Tatars.”
(3) There are also no police
officers in the next footage in
the hall of the hotel.
(4) It is obvious that the police
arrived after the scuffle started.
The footage at the end of the
video shows how the police
detain and take away violators
of the order. Now at least two
police cars and about 10 police
officers were filmed on the
territory adjacent to the hotel.
[0:01:56-0:02:43]
stayed to ensure the safety of the
conference participants.
Annex 1280
Annex 1281
President of the Russian Federation official website, “Sanctions for
offences during the preparation of and holding mass demonstrations,
comparative table”
Annex 1282
Electronic Justice, Court proceedings data confirming the absence of
any legal action taken by Krymska Svitlytsya against
“Krymsoyuzpechat” before Russian courts
Translation
https://kad.arbitr.ru/
ELECTRONIC JUSTICE
Party to a case
Krymsoyuzpechat
as a Respondent
10 cases
are found
Case Judge | Current judicial authority Plaintiff Respondent
21 February 2020
A83-2672/2020
Yu. A. Radvanovskaya
Arbitrazh Court of the Republic of Crimea
DG FINANCE RUS LLC KRYMSOYUZPECHAT JSC
27 November 2019
A83-20484/2019
N.Yu. Yakimchuk
Arbitrazh Court of the Republic of Crimea
ENTERTAINMENT ONE UK LIMITED KRYMSOYUZPECHAT JSC
27 November 2019
A83-20483/2019
N.Yu. Yakimchuk
Arbitrazh Court of the Republic of Crimea
ENTERTAINMENT ONE UK LIMITED KRYMSOYUZPECHAT JSC
27 November 2019
A83-20482/2019
V.N. Skuro
Arbitrazh Court of the Republic of Crimea
ENTERTAINMENT ONE UK LIMITED KRYMSOYUZPECHAT JSC
27 November 2019
A83-20448/2019
N.M. Lagutina
Arbitrazh Court of the Republic of Crimea
ENTERTAINMENT ONE UK LIMITED KRYMSOYUZPECHAT JSC
27 November 2019
A83-20447/2019
N.Yu. Yakimchuk
Arbitrazh Court of the Republic of Crimea
ENTERTAINMENT ONE UK LIMITED KRYMSOYUZPECHAT JSC
6 December 2018
A83-19075/2018
N.M. Lagutina
Arbitrazh Court of the Republic of Crimea
STATE UNITARY ENTERPRISE OF THE
REPUBLIC OF CRIMEA KRYMAVTOTRANS
KRYMSOYUZPECHAT JSC
20 September 2016
A83-6514/2016
V.I. Gayvoronsky
Arbitrazh Court of the Republic of Crimea
AUTONOMOUS NON-PROFIT
ORGANISATION “FOND ZASCHITY”
(PROTECTION FUND)
ASSOCIATION FOR THE
ADVANCEMENT OF SMALLAND
MEDIUM-SIZED
ENTERPRISES
SK MASTER LLC
10 March 2016
A83-1699/2016
M.I. Kurtlushaev
Arbitrazh Court of the Republic of Crimea
FINANCIAL SUPERVISION SERVICE OF
THE REPUBLIC OF CRIMEA
KRYMSOYUZPECHAT JSC
26 January 2016
A83-441/2016
S.O. Lukachev
Arbitrazh Court of the Republic of Crimea
ADMINISTRATION OF SIMFEROPOL OF
THE REPUBLIC OF CRIMEA
O.I. Stadnyuk
KRYMSOYUZPECHAT JSC
Individual Entrepreneur Olga
Ivanovna Stadnyuk
Annex 1282
Annex 1286
Website of the
“Myrotvorets.center” (“Mirotvorets”), as at
12 June 2021 (excerpts)
2
Annex 1286
4
© Myrotvorets Research Center, 2014-2021
All texts and graphic materials are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0
International License.
About the security of Ukraine
OUR PROTECT
SEA
KRIME
ORDILO
Dump storage
Site icon
JURA
Mobile application
for military servicemen
Annex 1286
Annex 1287
K.N. Akhmadeev, “The Turkish factor in the Crimean Tatar
ethnopolitical process”, Society: politics, economics, law, No. 3, 2018
(excerpts)
Translation
Excerpts
Akhmadeev Kamil Nailevich
PhD student, Russian Politics Department, Saint Petersburg State University
THE TURKISH FACTOR IN THE CRIMEAN TATAR ETHNOPOLITICAL PROCESS
Summary:
The paper considers the Turkish factor which affects the Crimean Tatar ethnopolitical process. The historical
impact of Turkey (the Ottoman Empire) on the Crimean Peninsula is investigated. The study determines the
mental attitude of Turkey towards the Crimean Tatar segment in Crimea. The research analyzes the diaspora
prerequisites for the influence of the Turkish state on the ethnopolitical processes arising in Crimea. The
author defines the ideological platform of pan-Turkism as an ideological and political justification for the
Turkish presence in the political and economic processes of the Crimean Peninsula. The paper identifies the
main agents and contractors of Turkish impact on the Crimean Tatar community. The processes of this
influence on economy and culture are described. It was argued that the Crimean Tatar ethnic community was
a link between the Turkish Republic and Ukraine until the latter had lost the effective control over the Crimean
Peninsula in 2014. The author substantiated that Turkey occupied the middle ground on the Crimean issue
which arose in 2014.
Keywords: ethnopolitical processes, Turkey, Ukraine, Crimean Tatars, pan-Turkism, national movements.
[…]
Page 3
[…]
Turkey supported the Ukrainian authorities’ efforts in assisting with the repatriation of Crimean Tatars.
The Turkish International Cooperation and Coordination Agency (TİKA) implemented a number of projects
in Crimea, the total cost of which amounted to USD 25 million, including the project “1,000 Houses” for
Crimean Tatars [14, p. 147]. The financial aspect of Turkey’s influence over the Crimean Tatar ethnopolitical
process consists in considerable investments involved into Crimea’s economy through TİKA’s channels. The
Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People, which is as an intermediary when Turkish capital was attracted to the
peninsula, acts as a counterparty in Turkish and Crimean Tatar cooperation in Crimea. As noted by O.V.
Ryabtsev, the Mejlis “for obvious reasons, has cart blanche” when it comes to the distribution of investments.
Moreover, some Crimean experts believe that Turkish capital has become pretty much the only source of
personal enrichment for the Mejlis’ leaders. At the same time, as the agency was ramping up its activities on
the Crimean “ground”, Crimea Foundation was established under the auspices of the Mejlis, and M. Dzhemilev
became its Chairman. The Foundation acts as the main partner of TİKA not only in Crimea, but generally in
Ukraine” [15, p. 96].
[…]
Annex 1287
Annex 1288
A.V. Yurasov (ed.), History of Crimea: in two volumes, Institute of
Russian History of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vol. 1,
Kuchkovo pole, Moscow, 2019
(excerpts)
Translation
Excerpts
RUSSIAN HISTORICAL SOCIETY
INSTITUTE OF RUSSIAN HISTORY
OF THE RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
HISTORY OF CRIMEA
IN TWO VOLUMES
Editor in chief
A.V. Yurasov
Kuchkovo pole
Moscow
2019
[…]
Vol. 1
[…]
Page 452
One of the oldest educational institutions of the Khanate was a madrasa, which later received the name
“Zincirli” – an educational institution established and built by Khan Mengli I Giray in around 1500 on the
outskirts of Bakhchisaray – Salachik. It derived its modern name from the word “Zanjeer”, a chain hung above
the front door that opens inward; this iron chain forced everyone who entered the temple of wisdom to bow
their head in respect. This name came later and originated most likely no earlier than the beginning of the 19th
century (documents of the 17th–18th centuries, including the registry of 1200 (1785/6) call the madrasa by the
name of its founder – “Madrasa of Mengli Giray”).
The madrasa’s building was by no means built on some empty ground: there was some structure or
even a group of structures before that, i.e. a settlement potentially dating back to the times of the Golden Horde.
The wall of the building preserved a plate – apparently used again – with a three-line Arabic inscription. From
the architectural point of view, Zincirli is a stone building, almost a square in design. There is a gallery
stretching along the perimeter of a large four-corner courtyard; the gallery is covered by 10 semi-sphere domes
that rest on pointed arches and columns. There are 13 rooms (hujra or oda) for students (sohta) on three sides.
The tarih above the entrance to the building reads: “Khan Mengli Giray, son of Khan Hacı Giray,
ordered to build this madrasa with the help of God, the possessor of generosity, may God make his reign
eternal. Year 906.” Zincirli was perhaps the only Islamic educational institution in the European territory of
the Golden Horde where teaching was uninterrupted for more than 400 years until the beginning of the 20th
century.
[…]
Annex 1288
Annex 1289
V.V. Fedunov, A.V. Staritsyn, “Organisational and Legal Activities of
the Taurida Governorate’s Zemstvo in 1887–1908”, Topical Issues of
Russian Law, No. 10, 2017
(excerpts)
Translation
Excerpts
PAGES OF HISTORY
V.V. Fedunov*,
A.V. Staritsyn**
Organisational and Legal Activities
of the Taurida Governorate’s Zemstvo
in 1887–1908”
[…]
Pages 12–13
[…]
After 20 years, the composition of the Zemstvo Assembly of Taurida Governorate underwent changes
associated with practical results of peasant, zemstvo, urban, and judicial reforms. For example, the composition
of glasnye [members of zemstvo assemblies] changed during the period of the seventh triennial (1885–1887).
Of the total number of glasnyh (36 people), seven representatives of peasant-proprietors from Melitopolskiy,
Berdyanskiy, Dneprovskiy and Perekopskiy uyezds [administrative and territorial units] were elected to it. The
number of military retirees from Crimean uyezd zemstvos decreased to 18 people. Two members of the legal
profession (two candidates of laws) appeared in the governorate’s zemstvo: V.I. Fursenko from the
Simferopolsky uyezd and A.V. Novikov from the Feodosiyskiy uyezd. The Evpatoriyskiy and Feodosiyskiy
uyezds delegated representatives of Crimean Tatars to the governorate’s zemstvo.4 From 1885 to 1887,
elections were held to the Zemstvo Assembly of Taurida Governorate of the seventh triennial, which operated
in accordance with the law on elections under the Statute of 1864. According to Article 53, V.P. Popov,
Governorate Marshal of Nobility, acted as Chairman. On 15 January 1887, A.V. Vsevolozhsky, Taurida’s
Governor and Active State Councillor, opened the assembly. On 16 January, the zemstvo assembly approved
its own assembly regulations (rules of procedure).
[…]
Topical Issues of Russian Law, 2017, No. 10 (83) October
[…]
4 Set of resolutions of the Taurida Governorate’s Zemstvo Assembly since the opening of zemstvo institutions in the
Taurida Governorate. 1866–1886. Simferopol, 1908–1909. Vol. 1. P. 768; Debates and resolutions of the Taurida
Zemstvo Assembly of the 20th ordinary session on 25 January–5 February. Simferopol, 1886. P. 9–10.
Annex 1289
Annex 1290
M.A. Aradzhioni, “The Greeks of Crimea: on the History of
Community Formation in the Late Middle Ages – Modern
Times”, Materials on Archaeology, History, and Ethnography of
Tavria: Collection of Research Papers, Simferopol,
Issue XIII, 2007
(excerpts)
Translation
(Excerpts)
Materials on Archaeology, History, and Ethnography of Tavria. Issue XIII
M.A. ARADZHIONI
THE GREEKS OF CRIMEA: ON THE HISTORY OF COMMUNITY FORMATION
IN THE LATE MIDDLE AGES – MODERN TIMES
[…]
Pages 648–649
[…]
On 16 June 1778 the representatives of Crimean Christians signed a resolution on voluntary
resettlement to Russia. This decision was driven by promises that 30 dessiatins of land in the Russian Empire
will be allocated to each person included in the census list (i.e. to each male in the family), which considerably
exceeded the size of land plots of the richest Greeks in Crimea. Having sold their property, under the
supervision of the troops led by A.V. Suvorov, the Greeks left Crimea in different ways with cattle and the
most necessary things (only one araba was allocated for 2 families). In September, the generalissimo reported
that 18,395 Greeks and 12,598 Armenians, Wallachians, and Georgians had left the peninsula [43, p. 678-714;
44]. By the end of 1779, the resettlers founded Mariupol at the mouth of the Kalmius River (where Pavlovsk
was located) and 19 villages in its vicinity, to which they gave Crimean names – Yalta, Karan, Laspi, Mangush,
Sartana, Staryi Krym, and others [45, pp. 202–208].
[…]
Annex 1290
Annex 1291
Ya.E.Vodarsky, O.I. Eliseeva, V.M. Kabuzan, “Crimean Population in
the Late 18th – the Late 20th Centuries (Number, Settlement, Ethnic
Composition)”, Institute of Russian History of the Russian Academy
of Sciences, Moscow , 2003
(excerpts)
Translation
Excerpts
Ya. E.Vodarsky, O. I. Eliseeva, V. M. Kabuzan
CRIMEAN POPULATION IN THE LATE 18TH – THE LATE 20TH CENTURIES
(Number, Settlement, Ethnic Composition)
MOSCOW – 2003
RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
INSTITUTE OF RUSSIAN HISTORY
[…]
Page 111
[…]
There were not many Ukrainians who settled in Crimea. First of all, this was because they were
intensively developing most prolific territories of mainland uyezds [administrative and territorial units]:
Melitopolskiy, Dneprovskiy, and Berdyanskiy. Ukrainians began actively developing Crimea only since the
1850s after Tatars started moving to Turkey (since 1855). Because of this, from the end of the 18th century to
1917, the proportion of Ukrainians increased only from 0.7% to 8.6%. In 1917, their share in rural areas of
Crimea reached 12.5% of the entire population. Here they were mostly cultivating the Evpatoriyskiy uyezd
where they outnumbered Russians (25.9% and 22.6% respectively).
Thus, the Ukrainian ethnic territory in Crimea was not formed, and Ukrainians became only one of
ethnic minorities and lived mostly in rural areas of the Evpatoriyskiy and, in part, Perekopskiy uyezds.
[…]
Annex 1291
Annex 1292
O.A. Gabrielyan, V.P., Petrov, Crimean Repatriates:
Deportation, Return, and Settlement, Simferopol, 1998
(excerpts)
1
Translation
(Excerpts)
O.A. Gabrielyan, S.A. Efimov, V.G. Zarubin, A.E. Kisliy, A.V. Malgin, A.R. Nikiforov, V.M. Pavlov,
V.P. Petrov.
Crimean Repatriates: Deportation, Return and Resettlement. – Simferopol: Amena Publishing House,
1998. – 340 p.
General editorship: O.A. Gabrielyan, Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, V.P. Petrov, Candidate of
Historical Sciences
Foreword: N.A. Shulga, Doctor of Sociological Sciences
Recommended for publication by the Crimean Branch of the Institute of Oriental Studies of the
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
[…]
Page 154
[…]
The repatriates’ employment remains an acute problem. In general, less than 70 thousand people have
permanent or seasonal work in Crimea out of 133 thousand able-bodied people. About half of them are
employed in the agricultural sector, more than 11 thousand – in the manufacturing industry and construction.
The number of people working in education is 4.3 thousand, in healthcare – 3.7 thousand.
[…]
Pages 176-177
[…]
The differences between the organizations [the National Movement of Crimean Tatars (NMCT) and the
Organisation of the Crimean Tatar National Movement (OCTNM)], which initially seemed insignificant,
subsequently led to a serious division between them. These differences concerned both theoretical and
organizational issues. Whereas the NMCT advocated for the restoration of the Crimean Autonomous Soviet
Socialist Republic on the basis of Soviet legislation and “Lenin’s principles,”288 the OCTNM focused on the
traditions established in 1917 and the ideas of restoration of statehood that had been destroyed in 1783.289
Unlike the NMCT, the OCTNM acted from the extreme anti-communist standpoint leaning toward Turkey
and the West in “foreign affairs.”290 At the same time, the OCTNM demanded a strict organisational
structure, whereas the NMCT remained an intellectual and largely ideological association. Subsequently, the
OCTNM adopted an uncompromising stance towards the official authorities, while the NMCT was willing to
engage in a dialogue with them. This was particularly evident in relation to the squatting of land plots in
1990-1991. While the NMCT condemned the squatting as an action that pitched the authorities and local
residents against Tatars and thus deferring their return, the OCTNM leaders, accusing the NMCT of being in
complicity with the authorities, described unauthorized constructions as an example of civil disobedience and
Annex 1292
the first step toward the reclamation of statehood. In 1989–1992, there was a steady growth of the OCTNM’s
authority among Crimean Tatars, whereas the position and influence of the NMCT were weakening
(especially after the organisation’s leader Yu. Osmanov was killed in 1993).291
[…]
Pages 190-191
[…]
With the creation of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (which was entrusted with a “representative”
function), the role of a radical force was taken over by the OCTNM, and then by the Crimean Tatar national
party “Adalet”. The draft charter of the Adalet party states that it “strives to build a national state in Crimea
based on the realization by the Crimean Tatar people of their natural right to self-determination.”320 Overall,
according to the draft charter, the party is a more structured and radical organisation than the OCTNM. Its
draft charter lacks traditional references to “democratic” goals, but instead points to the promotion of the
Muslim religion. Western literature noted that Crimean Tatar radicals were connected with extremist pan-
Turkic and Islamic organisations in Turkey, particularly with the “Grey Wolves”.321 In one of the first
documents of the party’s organising committee – “Statements Relating to the Formation of Crimean
Cossacks Structures” – it was noted that Adalet reserves the right to create “traditional for Crimea groups of
Askers (warriors, fighters – author) with the purpose to protect their families and their fellow Crimeans from
the threat of the so-called Cossacks.”322 Even though the leaders of the party and the Mejlis323 later refuted
reports that such groups were organised,323 the existence of such groups was repeatedly discussed in the print
media.324
Events that took place in June 1995 in Eastern Crimea showed that some portion of Crimean Tatars were
ready not only for a parliamentary struggle for their rights, but for radical mass action. According to official
reports of the law enforcement authorities, mass riots were of an organized nature. The NMCT’s materials
confirm that members of “Adalet” were involved in them.325
[…]
Page 197
2.7.3. International aspects in the activities of the
Crimean Tatar movement
Appeals to the global community, regular and extensive contacts with various international organizations
were one of the characteristic features of the Crimean Tatar national movement.
Mustafa Dzhemilev in his report at the 1st Qurultay of the Crimean Tatar People expressed his gratitude
toward foreign printed media outlets and radio stations, including “Radio Freedom”, “Voice of America”,
“Deutsche Welle”, “BBC”, “Radio Canada”, human rights organisations “Amnesty International”, “Freedom
House”, “Centre for Democracy in the USSR”, and others. Especially the speaker thanked national forces
and parties of Turkey, which, in his opinion, had never given up on the Crimean Tatar people fighting for
their own rights.335
After the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People was created, the international activity of Crimean Tatar leaders
has increased even more, acquiring new forms
It is possible to identify three areas of activity of the Mejlis in international relations.
Annex 1292
3
First, they desire to establish close and diverse contacts with unrecognized states (not with every state, but
with carefully chosen ones) formed in the ruins of the USSR and beyond.
As an example, one could refer to the regular ties with Dudayev’s Chechnya. Tellingly, even before the
federal forces initiated a military operation, on 9 December 1994, the Presidium of the Mejlis made a
statement concerning the events in Chechnya, expressing its concern over the aggravation of the situation
around that republic and stating its support for the Dudayev regime.336 The Mejlis made another statement
after the Russian forces had launched the operation in Chechnya (issued on 29 December 1994).337
Page 198
The information on the dispatch of Crimean volunteers to Chechnya was leaked to mass media.338 And
although it was not the Mejlis, but the OCTNM, Mustafa Dzhemilev expressed his opinion on this
unequivocally: “The Mejlis has no moral right to dissuade the volunteers from this!”339
[…]
Apart from the Caucasian (eastern) direction, the Mejlis is working on the south-western one as well. Thus,
in early 1993, Mustafa Dzhemilev and Stepan Topal, the Head of the Gagauz Republic, paid a visit to the
Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus. After the northern part of the Republic of Cyprus (78% of the island’s
population are ethnic Greeks, and 18% are Turks) was occupied by Turkish forces in 1975, the so-called
“Turkish Federated State of Cyprus” was proclaimed there. In 1983, the island’s territory occupied by
Turkish forces (40% of its area) was named the “Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus” (TRNC).
Page 199
The Crimean Tatar and Gagauz delegations were received there by the President of Northern Cyprus Raif
Denktaş and other high-ranking officials of the unrecognised state.343
[…]
It should be noted that Turkey receives representatives of the Mejlis at the highest level as if they were state
officials. There was even a case when Mustafa Dzhemilev (rather than the head of the administration or
another official) held negotiations over the establishment of twin-city relations between Bakhchisaray and
the Turkish town of Çatalca and, jointly with the Minister of Health of Ukraine, signed a protocol on the
construction of a Turkish medicine manufacturing plant in Crimea.346 During the visit of Mustafa Dzhemilev
to Turkey in May 1996, he officially met the President of Turkey Süleyman Demirel, the Speaker of the
Parliament, and the Prime Minister. During the negotiations, the Prime Minister of Turkey Mesut Yılmaz
confirmed that Turkey’s attitude towards Ukraine would largely depend on the resolution of the Crimean
Tatar problem.
Page 200
Turkey provides considerable material, financial, and political assistance to Crimean Tatars returning to the
peninsula. It consists of the creation of joint Ukrainian and Turkish enterprises (the Ukrainian side is mainly
represented by Crimean Tatars), the foundation of educational institutions with the active participation of
Turkey (there are also agreements with Northern Cyprus and Azerbaijan, according to which the Mejlis
sends students to higher educational institutions and interns to research centers), the widely advertised
construction program “1,000 Houses for Repatriates” at Turkey’s expense, and much more.347
[…]
Annex 1292
Annex 1293
Milliy Firqa website, “The Crimean Tatar People’s Front is established
in Crimea”, 30 January 2012
(excerpts)
Translation
Excerpts
Milliy Firqa
The Crimean Tatar People’s Front is established in Crimea
milli-firka.org/в-крыму-создан-крымскотатарский-наро/
30 January 2012
30 January 2012
On 28 January 2012, the Crimean Tatar People’s Front was established in Crimea.
On Saturday, 28 January 2012, a unified conference of the Crimean Tatar public forces was held in
Simferopol. According to the information of Ministry of Internal Affairs, around 450 delegates from 15
Crimean Tatar non-governmental organizations and Muslim communities of Crimea took part in the
conference.
At this conference, the Foundation Memorandum of the Crimean Tatar People’s Front (CTPF) was signed
and the form of the Mandate-Invitation for Delegates was approved with the representative quota of 1
delegate from each Crimean Tatar family. The Emergency Nationwide Congress of the Crimean Tatar
People was scheduled for 18 May 2012.
The main goals of the Crimean Tatar People’s Front are:
- nationwide assistance to the Government of Ukraine in the development, adoption and enactment of the
Law of Ukraine “On the restoration of the rights and the rehabilitation of the repressed Crimean Tatar
people” until 18 May 2012;
- holding the Emergency Nationwide Congress of the Crimean Tatar People on 18 May 2012 with the
representative quota of 1 delegate from each Crimean Tatar family to determine the future fate and
actions of the Crimean Tatar people, taking into account the situation as of 18 May 2012.
[…]
Annex 1293
Annex 1294
T.A. Senyushkina, “The Islamic factor in the confessional space of
Crimea”, Russian and the Muslim World, No. 3, 2018
(excerpts)
1
Translation
Excerpts
Senyushkina T.A.
THE ISLAMIC FACTOR IN THE CONFESSIONAL SPACE OF CRIMEA
[Russian and the Muslim World, 2018, No. 3]
Abstract. The article examines the processes taking place in the Muslim community of Crimea, beginning
with the emergence of Islam in the region. Special attention is paid to Islam in Crimea during the period from
the destruction of the USSR to 2014, when Crimea’s reunification with Russia occurred on the basis of a
referendum. The new model of relations between the state and Islamic religious organizations, which
developed in Crimea in 2014-2016 under the conditions of integration of the Crimean Muslim community into
the Russian socio-cultural and legal space, was analyzed. Special attention is paid to issues related to the
funding of Islamic religious organizations and the Russian legislation in this area.
Keywords: Islam, Crimea, Ukrainian crisis, reunion of Crimea with Russia, non-traditional Muslim
movements, struggle with religious extremism.
[…]
Pages 224-226
Today 11% of the population of Crimea are Muslims. In general, the Muslim community in Crimea is not
homogeneous. This is due to the fact that before 2014 the functioning of Islamic religious organizations was
largely dependent on external influence, which was exercised mainly by Turkey and Saudi Arabia, and to a
lesser extent by such countries as Pakistan, Iran, Jordan, Egypt, and Kuwait. At the same time, the influence
of radical Islamists from Chechnya, North Caucasus, and Central Asia on Crimean Muslims was observed.
There was no visible influence of Russian Muslim organizations among the Crimean Tatars before 2014 [5].
By 2010, the influence of the external Islamic factor on the Crimean ummah led to an aggravation of conflicts
within the Muslim community of Crimea. As of 1 January 2010, there were 1,168 Islamic religious
communities, 503 clergymen, 8 religious educational institutions, and 292 attendees in Crimea. It should be
noted that from 2000 to 2010 the number of religious communities increased by 3.5 times. The number of
clergymen increased by 53,8 %; the number of religious educational institutions – by five times. The number
of attendees increased by two times; the number of Sunday schools – by three times.
As a rule, mosques and religious educational institution were built in Crimea at the expense of Turkish and
Arabic sponsors. The increasing influence of foreign religious organizations on Crimean Muslims manifested
itself in a corresponding reorientation of a certain part of the believers [5].
The institutional structure of Islam in Crimea before 2014 was not homogeneous. The region had communities
that were part of several spiritual directorates and centres: the Spiritual Directorate of Muslims of Crimea
(SDMC), the Spiritual Directorate of Muslims of Ukraine (SDMU), the Independent Spiritual Centre of
Muslims of Ukraine (ISCMU), the Spiritual Directorate of Muslims of Ukraine “Ummah” (SDMU “Ummah”),
the Spiritual Centre of Muslims of Crimea (SCMC).
Out of all registered Muslim communities of Crimea, 49 communities did not form part of any of the abovementioned
directorates and were independent. Of these, 25–30 communities belonged to Wahhabis who had
extended their influence among Crimean Muslims since the 1990s, 10 communities belonged to Hizb ut-Tahrir,
a religious and political movement banned in the Russian Federation and in a number of other countries. For
the first time this movement made its presence known in Crimea back in 2004. 11 communities belonged to
Al-Ahbash who came to Crimea in 2007. All of the above currents represent non-traditional Islam and spread
Annex 1294
2
in Crimea as a result of outside influences, primarily from such countries as Saudi Arabia and Turkey. In
particular, 15 mosques were built with funds from Saudi Arabia. One of the demands of the Arab sponsors was
that the party funding the mosque construction should recommend its own imam, and that the community
should not obey the Spiritual Directorate of Muslims of Crimea [11].
In 2010, external influence on Crimean Muslims led to a split within the Crimean ummah and a conflict
between communities belonging to non-traditional Islamic movements and the Spiritual Directorate of
Muslims of Crimea, which received widespread media coverage.
Since the spring of 2014, with the integration of Crimea into the Russian political and legal space, there have
been changes in the religious sphere. First of all, the Hizb ut-Tahrir organization ceased its activities on the
peninsula, as it is banned in Russia.
Since March 2014, a new system of relations between the state and Islamic religious communities has been
formed in Crimea. All Islamic religious organizations became part of the Spiritual Directorate of Muslims of
Crimea, which helped overcome the internal conflict in the Crimean ummah. The Taurida Muftiyat was also
established. There are training courses for imams with cooperation with Islamic universities operating in the
Russian Federation.
Along with the admission of Crimea into Russia, the flows of external funding for the construction of mosques
in Crimea were suspended. The regions of Russia, in particular, Tatarstan and the Chechen Republic, provide
a great deal of financial assistance to Islamic religious organizations in Crimea. After the withdrawal of the
Turkish contractor from Crimea (as a result of the incident with the Russian military plane), the construction
of the cathedral mosque in Simferopol was resumed under the patronage of the President of the Russian
Federation
V.V. Putin.
[…]
Annex 1294
Annex 1295
T. Senyushkina, “Social and Political Situation in Crimea”, Russian
and the Muslim World, No. 10, 2013
(excerpts)
1
Translation
Excerpts
T. Senyushkina,
Doctor of Science in Public Administration
(Taurida National Vernadsky University)
SOCIAL AND POLITICAL SITUATION IN CRIMEA
[Russian and the Muslim World, 2013, No. 10]
[…]
Pages 90-92
[…]
Religious life. One of the issues most widely discussed by the local community in 2011, as well as in
previous years, was related to the construction of the Cathedral Mosque. The decision to allocate a land plot
for building a mosque dragged on for seven years dating back to 2004, when the Crimean Tatars applied for
an allocation of a land plot for the construction of a Cathedral Mosque on Yaltinskaya Street in Simferopol.
On 15 February 2011, the Simferopol City Council finally made a decision to grant permission for the
development of a land management project for the allocation of a land plot to the Spiritual Directorate of
Muslims of Crimea (SDMC) for the construction of a Cathedral Mosque at 22 Yaltinskaya Street in
Simferopol. On 2 March 2011, the Simferopol City Council approved the land management project
developed by the SDMC for the allocation of 2.7 hectares of land at 22 Yaltinskaya Street and transferred
this site for permanent use to this religious association. Already on 17 June 2011, the Spiritual Directorate of
Muslims of Crimea received a state act for the land plot. According to the press service of the SDMC, the
site of 2.7 hectares was transferred for permanent use for the construction of Buyuk Juma-Jami Cathedral
Mosque. After the positive decision on the allocation of land, a tender for mosque construction projects was
announced, and a special commission proceeded to select the best one that would most fully reflect the
architectural traditions of the Crimean Tatar nation. According to Mustafa Dzhemilev, based on preliminary
estimates the construction of the Cathedral Mosque would require not less than 80 million dollars.
Foreign sponsors are ready to allocate funds for the construction of the Cathedral Mosque in Simferopol. In
previous years, the main financial assistance for Crimean Muslims came mainly from Turkey and Arab
countries. There are agreements between the Spiritual Directorate of Muslims of Crimea and the Spiritual
Directorate of Muslims of Turkey for financial support to be provided by the latter for the construction of the
Cathedral Mosque. However, if these funds are not enough, it is likely that other funding sources for the
project will be sought. As a new trend typical for 2011, it can be stated that the spectrum of possible
influences on the Crimean Islam was expanded to include the influence of Iran. In particular, Iran is ready to
provide financial assistance to the Spiritual Directorate of Muslims of Crimea (SDMC) for the construction
of the Cathedral Mosque. This information was shared with the journalists in Simferopol by Mustafa
Dzhemilev, the co-chairman of the supervisory board for the construction of this facility and the leader of the
Mejlis. “We have been contacted by Iran as well,” he said. “Apparently, if we do not receive sufficient
financial support for the construction of this mosque in Turkey, it is possible that we may also apply to Iran,”
said Mustafa Dzhemilev. Moreover, the SDMC intends to apply to the Muslims of Ukraine and other citizens
of the country for donations for the construction of this facility.
In 2011, there was an unexpected refraction in the tendencies demonstrating intra-Islamic contradictions in
Crimea. For example, the official registration of the Spiritual Centre of Muslims of Crimea (SCMC), which
is parallel to the Spiritual Directorate of Muslims of Crimea, representing the Al-Ahbash movement in Islam
and, most likely, created by the Spiritual Directorate of Muslims of Ukraine to neutralize the activity of the
Annex 1295
2
Muslim Brotherhood in the Crimean peninsula, can be viewed as a resonant event. This opinion was, in
particular, expressed by Igor Semivolos, Director of the Center for Middle Eastern Studies, at the round table
meeting “Political Islam and Political Orthodoxy – New Realities of Crimea,” which took place in
Simferopol on 27 July 2011. According to the expert, the activities of the Al-Ahbash in the Middle East are
characterized by their irreconcilable struggle with the Muslim Brotherhood and the Head of the Al-Ahbash
Spiritual Directorate of Muslims of Ukraine, Sheikh Ahmad Tamim, “simply transferred the Middle East
realities to Crimea.” The official position of the SDMC and the Mejlis on this matter is extremely negative.
In particular, Ayder Ismailov, Deputy Head of the Spiritual Directorate of Muslims of Crimea, believes that
the registration of the Al-Ahbash Spiritual Center of Muslims of Crimea as a parallel muftiyat is a violation
of the rights of Crimean Muslims to directly elect their mufti at the Muslim congress.
[…]
Annex 1295
Annex 1296
Territorial Body of the Federal State Statistics Service for the
Republic of Crimea, “Main Trends of Migratory Movement of
the Population of the Republic of Crimea in 2014”,
Press issue, 2015
Translation
TERRITORIAL BODY OF THE FEDERAL STATE STATISTICS SERVICE FOR THE REPUBLIC
OF CRIMEA
(KRYMSTAT)
PRESS ISSUE
Main Trends of Migratory Movement of the Population of the Republic of Crimea in 2014
Beginning from 2004, the Republic has had a migration increase, owing to which the population has
grown by 50.9 thousand people over 11 years, and the migration balance was 16.4 thousand people in 2014.
Last year, there was a migration increase both in urban settlements and in the country – 12.4
thousand people and 4.0 thousand people respectively.
The number of arrived migrants was 24.2 thousand people and that of departed migrants – 7.8
thousand people. As compared with 2013, the number of both arrived and departed people decreased – by
19.8% and 69% respectively. Krymstat recorded the number of departed migrants in 2014 without fully
accounting for those people who departed to other constituent entities of the Russian Federation.
Among the arrived migrants, 12.3 thousand people were men, or 50.9%; among the departed
migrants – 3.7 thousand people were men, or 47.0%. Among the arrived migrants, 11.9 thousand people
were women, or 49.1%; among the departed migrants – 4.1 thousand people were women, or 53.0%.
Working-age people are the most active group involved in migration processes (72.4% of the arrived
people and 76.1% of the departed people). As a result of migration, the population of the Autonomous
Republic of Crimea of this age increased by 11.6 thousand people.
The percentage of working-age arrived migrants aged 16–28 was 41.3%, departed migrants – 50.4%.
The migration increase of the population of this age group is 4.3 thousand people.
It should also be noted that, as a result of migration, the population aged 15–19 increased by 1.0
thousand people, of whom 56.0% were young men and 44.0% were young women.
The portion of migrants who changed their place of residence within the autonomy is 23.8% of the
arrived people and 74.0% of the departed people. Besides, the rural population increased by 163 people who
arrived from cities.
As concerns external migrants – both arrived and departed ones – most of them were residents of
Russian regions – 48.6% and 19.1% respectively (without fully accounting for those people who departed to
other constituent entities of the Russian Federation). As concerns inter-regional migrants, 6.6% of the total
number of inter-regional migrants arrived from the federal city of Sevastopol.
The CIS countries account for 49.8% of the arrived foreign migrants and 74.7% of the departed
foreign migrants. Migration processes involving the CIS countries are characterized by a considerable
number of arrived migrants (9.2 thousand people) and a small number of departed migrants (1.5 thousand
people). The main migratory movement was with Ukraine and Uzbekistan – respectively, 93.7% and 3.9% of
arrived migrants and 98.6% of departed migrants to Ukraine.
There is a positive migration balance with all CIS countries. The largest migration increase was with
Ukraine (7.1 thousand people) and Uzbekistan (0.4 thousand people).
Other countries of the world account for 1.6% of arrived external migrants and 6.2% of departed
external migrants. There was also a positive migration balance with other countries – 0.2 thousand people.
Most migrants in this category came from Turkey – 60 people, India – 47 people, Georgia – 31 people, Israel
– 24 people, Nigeria – 21 people, and most departed migrants also moved to Turkey – 70 people, Israel – 12
people, Germany – 10 people, and the USA – 10 people.
Of the autonomy’s regions, the highest rate of arrival was in the urban district of Sudak – 25.1
people per 1,000 of the de-facto population, whereas the highest rate of departure was recorded in the urban
district of Simferopol – 6.3 people per 1,000 of the de-facto population.
Please provide a link to the source.
Annex 1296
Annex 1297
Territorial Body of the Federal State Statistics Service for the Republic
of Crimea, “Main Results of Migratory Movement of the Population of
the Republic of Crimea in 2015”, Press issue, 2016
1
Translation
TERRITORIAL BODY OF THE FEDERAL STATE STATISTICS SERVICE FOR THE REPUBLIC
OF CRIMEA
(KRYMSTAT)
PRESS ISSUE
Main Results of Migratory Movement of the Population of the Republic of Crimea
in 2015
Beginning from 2004, the Republic of Crimea has had a migration increase in population, owing to
which the population has grown by 67.2 thousand people over 12 years, and the migration balance was 16.3
thousand people in 2015.
The number of arrived people in 2015 – in terms of all migration flows – amounted to 42.9 thousand
people and that of departed people – 26.6 thousand people. There was a migration increase both in urban
settlements and in the country, 10.0 thousand people and 6.3 thousand people respectively.
Of the arrived migrants, 71.6% were registered at the new place of residence and 27.8% – at the
place of stay for nine months and more.
The percentage of migrants who changed their place of residence within the republic is 24.9% of the
arrived people and 40.1% of the departed people. Besides, the urban population increased by 667 people who
arrived from the country.
The portion of foreign migrants was 75.1% of the arrived people and 59.9% of the departed people.
Of foreign migrants who arrived in the Republic of Crimea in 2015, migrants from Russian regions
amounted to 14.6 thousand people (45.5%), 17.6 thousand people (54.5%) from the CIS countries and other
countries. Of people who departed from the Republic of Crimea, 15.7 thousand people (98.6%) moved to
Russian regions, 0.2 thousand people (1.4%) to the CIS countries and other countries.
The number of departed people was higher than that of arrived people when it comes to population
exchange with the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. There was a migration decrease of 1.0
thousand people with Russian regions in 2015. Most Crimeans depart to such cities as Moscow, Sevastopol,
Saint Petersburg, and also the Moscow Region and the Krasnodar Territory.
Migration processes involving the CIS countries are characterised by a considerable number of
arrived migrants (16.9 thousand people) and a small number of departed migrants (0.2 thousand people). In
terms of population exchange, a considerable migration increase was with Ukraine – 15.5 thousand people,
and Uzbekistan – 0.7 thousand people.
There was also a positive migration balance with other counties of the world – 0.6 thousand people.
Most of the migrants in this category came from India – 302 people, Nigeria – 66 people, Israel – 44 people.
Among the regions, the highest rate of arrival was in the urban district of Alushta – 384.1 people per
10,000 people, whereas the highest rate of departure was recorded in the Leninskiy Municipal District –
176.4 people per 10,000 people.
Among the arrived migrants, 21.4 thousand people were men, or 49.8%, 21.5 thousand people were
women, or 50.2%. Among the departed migrants, 13.1 thousand people were men, or 49.1%, 13.5 thousand
people were women, or 50.9%.
Among the arrived migrants, the percentage of people aged 0–15 was 10.9%, among the departed
migrants – 12.1%. There was a migration increase of 1.4 thousand people in this age group.
Working-age people are the most active group involved in migration processes (73.7% of the arrived
people and 77.9% of the departed people). As a result of migration, the population of Crimea of this age
increased by 10.9 thousand people.
It should also be noted that the percentage of above-working-age arrived migrants was 15.4% and
that of above-working-age departed migrants – 10.0%. The population of this age group increased as a result
of migration by 4.0 thousand people.
Annex 1297
2
As concerns circumstances that made the arrived migrants aged 14 and above change their place of
residence, 54.5% cited family reasons (the spouse change his/her place of work, marriage, moved to
children, parents), 13.2% – work-related reasons, 12.8% – returned to their previous place of residence, 9.1%
– study.
As concerns circumstances that made the departed migrants aged 14 and above change their places
of residence, 44.1% cited family-related reasons (the spouse change his/her place of work, marriage, moved
to children, parents), 12.3% – [cited] work-related reasons, 7.7% – [cited] that they returned to their previous
place of residence, 19.3% – [cited] study-related.
Annex 1297
Annex 1298
Territorial Body of the Federal Service of State Statistics of the
Republic of Crimea, Report “Social and Economic Situation of the
Republic of Crimea in January 2017”, Simferopol, 2017
(excerpts)
2
[…]
Page 57
REPUBLIC OF CRIMEA
General characteristics of the migration situation in the Republic of Crimea.
Table 3
General Migration Results
January-December
2016
For reference purposes
January-December
2015
people Per 10,000 people people Per 10,000 people
Migration - total
arrived 42032 220,1 42883 225,5
departed 30941 162,0 26586 139,8
migration increase (+),
decrease (-) +11091 +58,1 +16297 +85,7
including:
within Russia
arrived 30192 158,1 25316 133,1
departed 29061 152,2 26360 138,6
migration increase (+),
decrease (-) +1131 +5,9 -1044 -5,5
international migration
arrived 11840 62,0 17567 92,4
departed 1880 9,8 226 1,2
migration increase (+),
decrease (-) +9960 +52,2 +17341 +91,2
including:
with CIS member states
arrived 9918 51,9 16874 88,7
departed 741 3,9 175 0,9
migration increase (+),
decrease (-) +9177 +48,0 +16699 +87,8
with non-CIS foreign
countries
arrived 1922 10,1 693 3,7
departed 1922 5,9 51 0,3
migration increase (+),
decrease (-) +783 +4,2 +642 +3,4
In January-December 2016, there was a migration increase of 11091 people in population exchange. There
was a positive migration balance both within the regions of the Russian Federation – 1131 people and with
CIS states and other foreign countries – 9960 people. The largest population increase is observed in
international migration as part of migration exchange with Ukraine (8085), India (455), and Uzbekistan
(356 people)
[…]
Annex 1298
Annex 1299
Territorial Body of the Federal State Statistics Service for the
Republic of Crimea, Report “Social and Economic Situation of the
Republic of Crimea in January–December 2017”,
Simferopol, 2018
(excerpts)
2
[…]
Page 64
REPUBLIC OF CRIMEA
Table 3
General Migration Results
January-November
2017
For reference purposes
January-November
2016
people Per 10,000 people people Per 10,000 people
Migration - total
arrived 39175 223,8 37362 213,9
departed 30988 177,0 27341 156,5
migration increase (+),
decrease (-) +8187 +46,8 +10021 +57,4
including:
within Russia
arrived 29720 169,7 27246 156,0
departed 28518 162,9 26120 149,5
migration increase (+),
decrease (-) +1202 +6,8 +1126 +6,5
international migration
arrived 9455 54,1 10116 57,9
departed 2470 14,1 1221 7,0
migration increase (+),
decrease (-) +6985 +40,0 +8892 +50,9
including:
with CIS member states
arrived 8461 48,4 8734 50,0
departed 1719 9,8 654 3,8
migration increase (+),
decrease (-) +6742 +38,6 +8080 +46,2
with non-CIS foreign
countries
arrived 994 5,7 1382 7,9
departed 751 4,3 567 3,2
migration increase (+),
decrease (-) +243 +1,4 +815 +4,7
In January-November 2017, there was a migration increase of 8187 people in population exchange. There was
a positive migration balance both within the regions of the Russian Federation – 1202 people and with CIS
states and other foreign countries – 6985 people. The largest population increase is observed in international
migration as part of migration exchange with Ukraine (5810), Uzbekistan (455), Belarus (134) and Armenia
(116).
[…]
Annex 1299
Annex 1300
Directorate of the Federal State Statistics Service for the Republic of
Crimea and Sevastopol, “Main Results of Migratory Movement of
the Population of the Republic of Crimea in 2018”, Press issue,
Simferopol, 2019
1
Translation
DIRECTORATE OF THE FEDERAL STATE STATISTICS SERVICE FOR THE REPUBLIC OF
CRIMEA AND SEVASTOPOL
(KRYMSTAT)
PRESS ISSUE
Main results of migratory movement of the population of the Republic of Crimea in 2018
Beginning from 2004, the Republic of Crimea has had a migration increase in population, by which
the population has grown by 91 thousand people over 14 years, including 4.8 thousand people in 2018.
The number of arrived people in 2018 – in terms of all migration flows – amounted to 44.9 thousand
people and that of departed people – 40.1 thousand people.
Of the arrived migrants, 48% were men and 52% were women. Of the departed migrants, 49% were
men and 51% were women.
Of the arrived migrants, slightly more than 41% were registered at the new place of residence and
40% – at the place of stay for nine months and more, and one in five people returned to his or her place of
residence after temporarily staying in another territory.
Of the departed migrants, 42% were deregistered at their previous place of residence, one in three
people left the place of residence for the place of stay, and also one in three people left for the previous place
of residence from the territory of temporary stay.
The percentage of migrants who changed their place of residence within the republic is 36% of the
arrived people and 40% of the departed people. Besides, the urban population increased by 0.7 thousand
people who arrived from the countryside.
The percentage of foreign migrants was 64% of the arrived people and 60% of the departed people.
Of foreign migrants who arrived in the Republic of Crimea in 2018, migrants from Russian regions
amounted to 19 thousand people, 8 thousand people from the CIS countries and 1 thousand people from
other foreign countries. Of people who departed from the Republic of Crimea, 18 thousand people moved to
Russian regions, 5 thousand people to the CIS countries and 1 thousand people to other foreign countries.
As concerns population exchange with Russian regions, there was a general migration increase of 1.0
thousand people in 2018.
In 2018, migration processes involving the CIS countries are characterised by a considerable number
of arrived migrants (8 thousand people), with the number of departed migrants (5 thousand people) lower by
almost a third. In terms of population exchange, the most migration increase is with Ukraine – 2 thousand
people.
There was also a positive migration balance with other counties of the world – 0.3 thousand people.
The most migration increase in this category is with India – 0.2 thousand people.
Of the arrived migrants, there were 7 thousand people aged 0-15, of the departed migrants – 6
thousand people. There was a migration increase of 0.3 thousand people in this age group.
Working-age people are the most active group involved in migration processes (73% of the arrived
people and 74% of the departed people). As a result of migration, the population of Crimea of this age
increased by 3.0 thousand people.
It should also be noted that the percentage of above-working-age arrived migrants was 12% and that
of above-working-age departed migrants – 11%. The population of this age group increased as a result of
migration by 1.4 thousand people.
As concerns circumstances that made the arrived migrants aged 14 and above change their place of
residence, 18 thousand people cited family-related reasons (the spouse change his/her place of work,
marriage, moved to children, parents), 8 thousand people – [cited] that they were temporarily absent, 4
thousand people – [cited] study-related reasons, 3 thousand people – [cited] work-related reasons, 2 thousand
people – [cited] that they returned to their previous place of residence.
If you use the material, please provide a link to Krymstat.
Alexandra Zhorzhevna Kornienko
8 (3652) 27-57-08, +79789825588
Population Statistics and Health Department
Annex 1300
Annex 1301
Directorate of the Federal State Statistics Service for the Republic of
Crimea and Sevastopol, Report “Social and Economic Situation of the
Republic of Crimea in January–December 2019”, Simferopol, 2020
(excerpts)
2
[…]
Pages 69-70
REPUBLIC OF CRIMEA
Table 3
General Migration Results
January-November
2019
For reference purposes
January- November
2018
people Per 10,000
people people Per 10,000
people
Migration - total
arrived 45178 258,1 41293 235,8
departed 37124 212,1 36079 206,1
migration increase (+),
decrease (-) +8054 +46,0 +5214 +29,7
including:
within Russia
arrived 35511 202,9 32734 187,0
departed 32140 183,7 30880 176,4
migration increase (+),
decrease (-) +3371 +19,2 +1854 +10,6
international migration
arrived 9667 55,2 8559 48,8
departed 4984 28,4 5199 29,7
migration increase (+),
decrease (-) +4683 +26,8 +3360 19,1
including:
with CIS member states
arrived 8635 49,3 7532 43,1
departed 4000 22,8 4505 25,7
migration increase (+),
decrease (-) +4635 +26,5 +3027 +17,4
with non-CIS foreign countries
arrived 1032 5,9 1027 5,7
departed 984 5,9 694 4,0
migration increase (+),
decrease (-) +48 +0,3 +333 +1,7
In January-November 2019, there was a migration increase of 8054 people in population exchange. There was
a positive migration balance both within the regions of the Russian Federation – 3371 people and with CIS
states and other foreign countries – 4683 people. The largest population increase is observed in international
migration as part of migration exchange with Ukraine (3401), Uzbekistan (548), Armenia (226), Belarus and
Kazakhstan (143 and 116).
[…]
Annex 1301
Annex 1302
A. A. Ibraimov, “Ethnopolitical processes in Crimea and their impact
on Russia’s interests in the region”, Bulletin of the University,
No. 8, 2013
(excerpts)
Translation
Excerpts
Bulletin of the University, 2013, No. 8
A. A. Ibraimov
ETHNOPOLITICAL PROCESSES IN CRIMEA AND THEIR IMPACT ON RUSSIA’S
INTERESTS IN THE REGION
[…]
Page 5 [Page 212 in the Bulletin of the University, 2013, No. 8]
[…]
Let us consider technologies used in manipulations involving the ethnic issue. The Large Law
Dictionary has the following definition: victimisation is the process of being victimised or the end
result of becoming a victim of criminal encroachment. Victimisation is studied not only in psychology
but in legal sciences as well.
This is the policy now pursued in relation to the Crimean Tatar population in Crimea. In contrast to
other peoples deported to the territories of the USSR who had an opportunity to return to their
previous places of residence starting from 1956, Crimean Tatars were officially allowed to do it in
1989. Since the 1970s, there had been isolated cases when people returned, but the authorities took
drastic action by covert means to prevent that (the people who returned were not given employment
and residence registration in medium- and large-sized cities, and so on). Now the abovementioned
Mejlis is promoting an idea that it is not specific politicians who are responsible for bygone historical
mistakes but rather all Russians.
[…]
Annex 1302
Annex 1303
Directorate of the Federal State Statistics Service for the Republic of
Crimea and Sevastopol, Report “Social and Economic Situation of the
Republic of Crimea in January–December 2020”, Simferopol, 2021
(excerpts)
2
[…]
Pages 69-70
REPUBLIC OF CRIMEA
Table 2
General Migration Results
January-November
2020
For reference
purposes
January- November
2019
people Per
10,000
people
people Per
10,000
people
Migration - total
arrived 51251 292,7 45178 235,8
departed 41126 234,9 37124 212,1
migration increase (+),
decrease (-) +10125 +57,8 +8054 +46,0
including:
within Russia
arrived 40353 230,5 35511 202,9
departed 35612 203,4 32140 183,7
migration increase (+),
decrease (-) +4741 +27,1 +3371 +19,2
international migration
arrived 10898 62,2 9667 55,2
departed 5514 31,5 4984 28,4
migration increase (+),
decrease (-) +5384 +30,7 +4683 +26,8
including:
with CIS member states
arrived 10292 58,8 8635 49,3
departed 4541 25,9 4000 22,8
migration increase (+),
decrease (-) +5751 +32,9 +4635 +26,5
with non-CIS foreign countries
arrived 606 3,4 1032 5,9
departed 973 5,6 984 5,9
migration increase (+),
decrease (-) -367 -2,2 +48 +0,3
Annex 1303
3
In January-November 2020, there was a migration increase of 10125 people in
population exchange. There was a positive migration balance both with the regions of the
Russian Federation – 4741 people and with CIS states and other foreign countries – 5384
people. The largest population increase is observed in international migration as part of
migration exchange with Ukraine - 5017 people, Uzbekistan - 465 people, Azerbaijan – 102
people, Belarus – 55 people and Kazakhstan – 52 people.
[…]
Annex 1303
Annex 1304
Directorate of the Federal State Statistics Service for the Republic of
Crimea and Sevastopol, “Main Results of Migratory Movement of
the Population of Sevastopol in 2017”, Press issue, Sevastopol, 2018
1
Translation
DIRECTORATE OF THE FEDERAL SERVICE OF STATE STATISTICS SERVICE FOR THE
REPUBLIC OF CRIMEA AND SEVASTOPOL
(KRYMSTAT)
PRESS ISSUE
MAIN RESULTS OF MIGRATORY MOVEMENT OF THE POPULATION OF SEVASTOPOL IN
2017
Beginning from 2000 Sevastopol has had a migration increase in population by which the population
of the city has grown by 57.2 thousand people over 17 years, and the migration balance was 8.7 thousand
people in 2017.
The number of arrived people in 2017 – in terms of all migration flows – amounted to 20,205 people
and that of departed people – 11,472 people. There was a migration increase both in urban settlements and in
the country, 8,717 people and 16 people respectively.
Of the arrived migrants, 53.9% were registered at the new place of residence and 41.3% – at the
place of stay for nine months and more, 4.8% returned to their place of residence after temporarily staying in
another territory. Of the departed migrants, 51.6% were deregistered at their previous place of residence,
20.3% left the place of residence for the place of stay, 28.1% left for the previous place of residence from the
territory of temporary stay.
The percentage of migrants who changed their place of residence within the city is 20.0% of the
arrived people and 35.1% of the departed people.
The percentage of foreign migrants was 80.0% of the arrived people and 64.9% of the departed
people. Of foreign migrants who arrived in Sevastopol in 2017, migrants from Russian regions amounted to
12,439 people (76.9%), 3,652 people (22.6%) from the CIS countries and 82 people (0.5) from other foreign
countries. Of people who departed from Sevastopol, 6,497 people (87.3%) moved to Russian regions, 924
people (12.4%) to the CIS countries and 19 people (0.3%) to other foreign countries.
As concerns migration exchange with Russian regions, there was a general migration increase of
5,492 people in 2017. The highest migration increase was with the South Federal District – 2,345 people, the
Republic of Crimea – 1,542 people, the Volga Federal District – 668 people, and the Siberian Federal
District – 634 people.
Migration processes involving the CIS countries are characterised by a considerable number of
arrived migrants (3,652 people) and a small number of departed migrants (924 people). In terms of
population exchange, a considerable migration increase was with Ukraine – 2,519 people.
There was also a positive migration balance with other counties of the world – 63 people. The
highest migration increase in this area is with Germany –14 people, Israel – 12 people, and Estonia – 10
people.
Of the arrived migrants, 52.4% were men, 47.6% were women. Of the departed migrants, 51.9%
were men, 48.1% were women.
Of the arrived migrants, there were 3,527 people aged 0–15, or 17.5%; of the departed migrants –
1,861 people, or 16.2%. There was a migration increase of 1,666 people in this age group.
Working-age people are the most active group involved in migration processes (71.1% of the arrived
people and 74.1% of the departed people). It should also be noted that the percentage of above-working-age
arrived migrants was 11.4% and that of above-working-age departed migrants – 9.7%.
As concerns circumstances that made the arrived migrants aged 14 and above change their place of
residence, 8,247 people cited family reasons (the spouse change his/her place of work, marriage, moved to
children, parents), 3,380 people – [cited] work-related reasons, 1,601 people – [cited] that they returned
Annex 1304
2
acquired housing property, 1,312 people – [cited] -related reasons, and 575 people – [cited] that they
returned to their previous place of residence.
As concerns circumstances that made the departed migrants aged 14 and above change their places
of residence, 3,536 cited family reasons, 975 people – [cited] work-related reasons, 520 people – [cited]
study-related reasons, 320 people – [cited] that they returned to their previous place of residence.
If you use the material, please provide a link to Krymstat.
Department of Summary Statistics, Organisation and Holding of Censuses and Monitoring.
(8692)44-18-68
Annex 1304
Annex 1305
Directorate of the Federal State Statistics Service for the Republic of
Crimea and Sevastopol, Report “Social and Economic Situation of
Sevastopol in January 2019”, Sevastopol, 2019
(excerpts)
2
[…]
Page 53
CITY OF SEVASTOPOL
Table 3
General Migration Results
January-December
2018
For reference purposes
January- December
2017
people Per 10,000
people people Per 10,000
people
Migration - total
arrived 21126 480,2 20205 467,1
departed 13387 304,3 11472 265,2
migration increase (+),
decrease (-) +7739 +175,9 +8733 +201,9
including:
within Russia
arrived 17461 396,9 16471 380,8
departed 12241 278,3 10529 243,4
migration increase (+),
decrease (-) +5220 +118,6 +5942 +137,4
international migration
arrived 3665 83,3 3734 86,3
departed 1146 26,0 943 21,8
migration increase (+),
decrease (-) +2519 +57,3 +2791 +64,5
including:
with CIS member states
arrived 3586 81,5 3652 84,4
departed 1125 25,6 924 21,4
migration increase (+),
decrease (-) +2461 +55,9 +2728 +63,0
with non-CIS foreign countries
arrived 79 1,8 82 1,9
departed 21 0,5 19 0,4
migration increase (+),
decrease (-) +58 +1,3 +63 +1,5
Annex 1305
3
In January-December 2018, there was a migration increase of 7739 people in population
exchange. There was a positive migration balance both with the regions of the Russian Federation
– 5220 people and with CIS states and other foreign countries – 2461 and 2519 people
respectively. The largest population increase is observed in international migration as part of
migration exchange with Ukraine (2244 people), Republic of Moldova (57 people), Kazakhstan
– (46 people).
[…]
Annex 1305
Annex 1306
Directorate of the Federal State Statistics Service for the Republic of
Crimea and Sevastopol, Report “Social and Economic Situation of
Sevastopol in January 2020”, Sevastopol, 2020
(excerpts)
2
[…]
Page 52
CITY OF SEVASTOPOL
Table 3
General Migration Results
January-December1
2018
For reference
purposes
January- December
2017
people Per
10,000
people
people Per
10,000
people
Migration - total
arrived 21399 479,6 21126 480,2
departed 13970 313,1 13387 304,3
migration increase (+),
decrease (-) +7429 +166,5 +7739 +175,9
including:
within Russia
arrived 16409 367,8 17461 396,9
departed 12227 274,1 12241 278,3
migration increase (+),
decrease (-) +4182 +93,7 +5220 +118,6
international migration
arrived 4990 111,8 3665 83,3
departed 1743 39,1 1146 26,0
migration increase (+),
decrease (-) +3247 +72,7 +2519 +57,3
including:
with CIS member states
arrived 4822 108,1 3586 81,5
departed 1701 38,1 1125 25,6
migration increase (+),
decrease (-) +3121 +70,0 +2461 +55,9
with non-CIS foreign countries
arrived 168 3,7 79 1,8
departed 42 0,9 21 0,5
migration increase (+),
decrease (-) +126 +2,8 +58 +1,3
1 The data is preliminary.
Annex 1306
3
In January-December 2019, there was a migration increase of 7429 people in
population exchange. There was a positive migration balance both with the regions of the
Russian Federation – 4182 people and with CIS states and other foreign countries – 3121
and 126 people respectively. The largest population increase is observed in international
migration as part of migration exchange with Ukraine (2711 people), Kazakhstan (117
people), Republic of Belarus – (90 people).
[…]
Annex 1306
Annex 1307
State Statistics Committee of Ukraine, “Statistical Yearbook of Ukraine
for 2008”, Kiev, 2009
(excerpts)
1
Translation
Excerpts
STATE STATISTICS COMMITTEE OF UKRAINE
STATISTICAL YEARBOOK OF
UKRAINE
for 2008
Kiev 2009
Annex 1307
2
[…]
Pages 356-357 POPULATION
16.30. Population migration in 2008, by region
International migration Interregional migration
total
immigr
ants
total
emigra
nts
migration
balance
total
immigra
nts
total
emigrants
migration
balance
Persons
Ukraine 37323 22402 14921 265960 265960 x
Autonomous
Republic of Crimea 4239 1704 2535 10472 9537 935
oblasts
Vinnytsia 1196 552 644 8995 11304 –2309
Volyn 590 541 49 5094 5065 29
Dnepropetrovsk 1789 1313 476 12770 15018 –2248
Donetsk 3962 2976 986 12955 14828 –1873
Zhitomir 547 429 118 7481 9705 –2224
Zakarpattia 295 652 –357 2519 3542 –1023
Zaporozhie 1557 966 591 7644 8605 –961
Ivano-Frankovsk 519 319 200 5267 5606 –339
Kiev 933 304 629 18452 17726 726
Kirovograd 356 293 63 5446 9488 –4042
Lugansk 1548 1997 –449 7169 10350 –3181
Lvov 549 582 –33 8452 9150 –698
Nikolaev 868 425 443 6225 7813 –1588
Odessa 4852 886 3966 11537 8884 2653
Poltava 562 483 79 9085 9432 –347
Rovno 388 654 –266 6079 7685 –1606
Sumy 654 546 108 6143 7571 –1428
Ternopol 331 330 1 4553 6028 –1475
Kharkov 4018 2285 1733 18490 15818 2672
Kherson 594 586 8 5822 8589 –2767
Khmelnitskiy 636 452 184 8444 9439 –995
Cherkassy 622 369 253 9740 10313 –573
Chernovtsy 548 298 250 3911 3501 410
Chernigov 498 525 –27 7335 8135 –800
cities
City of Kiev 3618 1563 2055 51330 29985 21345
City of Sevastopol1 1054 372 682 4550 2843 1707
356 Statistical Yearbook of Ukraine for 2008
State Statistics Committee of Ukraine
Annex 1307
3
Table 16.30 is continued
International migration Interregional migration
total
immigr
ants
total
emigra
nts
migrati
on
balance
total
immigrants
total
emigrants
migration
balance
Per 100 thsd. present population
Ukraine 80,7 48,4 32,3 574,9 574,9 x
Autonomous
Republic of Crimea 215,2 86,5 128,7 531,8 484,3 47,5
oblasts
Vinnytsia 71,8 33,1 38,7 539,9 678,5 –138,6
Volyn 56,9 52,2 4,7 491,5 488,7 2,8
Dnepropetrovsk 52,8 38,8 14,0 377,1 443,5 –66,4
Donetsk 87,7 65,9 21,8 286,6 328,1 –41,5
Zhitomir 42,1 33,0 9,1 575,5 746,6 –171,1
Zakarpattia 23,7 52,4 –28,7 202,7 285,0 –82,3
Zaporozhie 85,2 52,9 32,3 418,4 471,0 –52,6
Ivano-Frankovsk 37,6 23,1 14,5 381,2 405,7 –24,5
Kiev 53,8 17,5 36,3 1065,0 1023,1 41,9
Kirovograd 34,5 28,4 6,1 527,0 918,1 –391,1
Lugansk 66,0 85,2 –19,2 305,9 441,6 –135,7
Lvov 21,5 22,8 –1,3 330,6 357,9 –27,3
Nikolaev 72,3 35,4 36,9 518,9 651,2 –132,3
Odessa 202,7 37,0 165,7 482,0 371,2 110,8
Poltava 37,0 31,8 5,2 598,4 621,3 –22,9
Rovno 33,7 56,8 –23,1 527,9 667,4 –139,5
Sumy 54,9 45,9 9,0 516,0 636,0 –120,0
Ternopol 30,2 30,1 0,1 415,4 550,0 –134,6
Kharkov 144,0 81,9 62,1 662,9 567,1 95,8
Kherson 53,8 53,1 0,7 527,7 778,5 –250,8
Khmelnitskiy 47,3 33,6 13,7 627,4 701,3 –73,9
Cherkassy 47,5 28,2 19,3 743,6 787,3 –43,7
Chernovtsy 60,6 33,0 27,6 432,5 387,2 45,3
Chernigov 44,1 46,5 –2,4 649,9 720,8 –70,9
cities
City of Kiev 131,4 56,8 74,6 1864,6 1089,2 775,4
City of Sevastopol1 277,5 97,9 179,6 1198,1 748,6 449,5
1 See the second footnote to Table 16.3
Statistical Yearbook of Ukraine for 2008 357
State Statistics Committee of Ukraine
[…]
Annex 1307
Annex 1308
State Statistics Committee of Ukraine, “Statistical Yearbook of Ukraine
for 2009”, Kiev, 2010
(excerpts)
1
Translation
Excerpts
STATE STATISTICS COMMITTEE OF UKRAINE
STATISTICAL YEARBOOK OF
UKRAINE
for 2009
Kiev 2010
Annex 1308
2
[…]
Pages 353-354 POPULATION
16.30. Population migration in 2009, by region
International migration Interregional migration
total
immigr
ants
total
emigra
nts
migration
balance
total
immigrant
s
total
emigrants
migration
balance
Persons
Ukraine 32917 1947
0
13447 242798 242798 x
Autonomous
Republic of Crimea 3534 1402 2132 8944 8054 890
oblasts
Vinnytsya 1376 586 790 8879 10216 –1337
Volyn 470 437 33 4719 4970 –251
Dnepropetrovsk 1580 1229 351 11888 13322 –1434
Donetsk 3118 2409 709 11059 13627 –2568
Zhitomyr 478 359 119 6812 8444 –1632
Zakarpattia 251 480 –229 2316 3254 –938
Zaporozhie 1482 880 602 6912 7397 –485
Ivano-Frankovsk 522 392 130 5136 5380 –244
Kiev 714 275 439 17121 15416 1705
Kirovograd 428 336 92 5510 7970 –2460
Lugansk 1382 1827 –445 6588 8765 –2177
Lvov 529 636 –107 8058 8494 –436
Nikolaev 927 429 498 5666 6881 –1215
Odessa 3793 842 2951 10679 7911 2768
Poltava 603 409 194 8691 8680 11
Rovno 313 448 –135 5969 7301 –1332
Sumy 609 429 180 5694 7112 –1418
Ternopol 336 329 7 4500 5726 –1226
Kharkov 2490 1967 523 16451 14989 1462
Kherson 618 461 157 5641 7007 –1366
Khmelnitskiy 580 335 245 8181 8764 –583
Cherkassy 645 316 329 9308 9262 46
Chernovtsy 614 219 395 3817 3286 531
Chernigov 783 465 318 6915 7117 –202
cities
City of Kiev 3970 1254 2716 43690 31002 12688
City of Sevastopol1 772 319 453 3654 2451 1203
Statistical Yearbook of Ukraine for 2009 353
State Statistics Committee of Ukraine
Annex 1308
3
Table 16.30 continued
International migration Interregional migration
total
immigrants
total
emigra
nts
migration
balance
total
immigrants
total
emigrants
migratio
n balance
Per 100 thsd. present population
Ukraine
Autonomous
71,5 42,3 29,2 527,2 527,2 x
Republic of
Crimea 179,7 71,3 108,4 454,9 409,6 45,3
oblasts
Vinnytsia 83,1 35,4 47,7 536,4 617,2 –80,8
Volyn 45,4 42,2 3,2 455,3 479,5 –24,2
Dnepropetrovsk 47,0 36,6 10,4 353,3 395,9 –42,6
Donetsk 69,5 53,7 15,8 246,6 303,9 –57,3
Zhitomir 37,0 27,8 9,2 528,1 654,6 –126,5
Zakarpattia 20,2 38,6 –18,4 186,2 261,6 –75,4
Zaporozhie 81,6 48,5 33,1 380,5 407,2 –26,7
Ivano-Frankovsk 37,8 28,4 9,4 371,9 389,6 –17,7
Kiev 41,4 15,9 25,5 992,6 893,8 98,8
Kirovograd 41,9 32,9 9,0 538,9 779,5 –240,6
Lugansk 59,5 78,7 –19,2 283,8 377,5 –93,7
Lvov 20,7 24,9 –4,2 315,8 332,9 –17,1
Nikolaev 77,7 36,0 41,7 475,1 576,9 –101,8
Odessa 158,6 35,2 123,4 446,5 330,8 115,7
Poltava 40,1 27,2 12,9 577,3 576,6 0,7
Rovno 27,2 38,9 –11,7 518,5 634,2 –115,7
Sumy 51,7 36,4 15,3 483,2 603,6 –120,4
Ternopol 30,8 30,2 0,6 412,4 524,8 –112,4
Kharkov 89,7 70,9 18,8 592,7 540,0 52,7
Kherson 56,4 42,1 14,3 514,5 639,1 –124,6
Khmelnitskiy 43,3 25,0 18,3 611,6 655,2 –43,6
Cherkassy 49,6 24,3 25,3 716,1 712,6 3,5
Chernovtsy 67,9 24,2 43,7 422,1 363,4 58,7
Chernigov 70,2 41,7 28,5 619,9 638,0 –18,1
cities
City of Kiev 143,0 45,1 97,9 1574,2 1117,1 457,1
City of
Sevastopol1
203,0 83,9 119,1 960,9 644,5 316,4
1 See the second footnote to Table 16.3
354 Statistical Yearbook of Ukraine for 2009
State Statistics Committee of Ukraine
[…]
Annex 1308
Annex 1309
State Statistics Service of Ukraine, “Population of Ukraine for 2010.
Demographic Yearbook”, Kiev, 2011
(excerpts)
1
Translation
Excerpts
STATE STATISTICS SERVICE OF UKRAINE
POPULATION OF UKRAINE
for 2010
Demographic Yearbook
Kiev 2011
Annex 1309
2
[…]
Page 424
6.4. Interregional migration by arrival and departure areas
in Ukraine in 2010
(persons)
Arrival
area
Departure
area
Ukraine
To regions
AR of Crimea Vinnytsia Volyn Dnepropetrovsk Donetsk
Ukraine 257685 9693 9458 5153 13437 12518
Form Regions
The Autonomous
Republic of Crimea 8553 - 206 62 568 472
Oblasts
Vinnytsia 10487 192 - 66 259 217
Volyn 5262 83 95 - 138 50
Dnepropetrovsk 14512 855 297 180 - 1446
Donetsk 14648 969 256 58 1579 -
Zhitomir 8463 167 647 111 159 145
Zakarpattia 3270 46 130 59 113 66
Zaporozhie 7879 670 106 41 1854 985
Ivano-Frankovsk 5593 74 142 101 94 51
Kiev 15557 178 664 158 243 209
Kirovograd 8371 209 288 29 1558 214
Lugansk 9470 381 137 35 442 2601
Lvov 9161 140 277 1085 224 104
Nikolaev 6868 290 193 30 616 188
Odessa 8472 378 1194 93 399 277
Poltava 9089 179 114 40 739 331
Rovno 7414 82 129 1266 120 68
Sumy 7160 175 92 68 200 269
Ternopol 5959 107 116 177 78 50
Kharkov 16075 1040 236 161 1279 3129
Kherson 7195 752 190 43 958 243
Khmelnitskiy 9359 167 948 149 159 135
Cherkassy 10347 237 594 45 451 199
Chernovtsy 3482 48 220 74 49 55
Chernigov 7571 100 137 70 145 159
City of Kyiv 34778 749 2028 940 917 767
City of Sevastopol (City
Council) 2690 1425 22 12 96 88
Annex 1309
3
[…]
Page 428
Continuation of the table. 6.4
Arrival
area
Departure
area
To regions
Chernivtsi Chernihiv The City of Kyiv
The City of
Sevastopol
(City Council)
Ukraine 3754 7223 43144 3882
From regions:
The Autonomous
Republic of Crimea 48 109 914 1806
Oblasts
Vinnytsia 308 148 2504 55
Volyn 83 66 1135 13
Dnepropetrovsk 46 186 1755 157
Donetsk 64 176 1808 278
Zhytomyr 55 140 3319 37
Zakarpattia 101 80 400 9
Zaporozhie 26 69 974 156
Ivano-Frankovsk 860 43 627 16
Kiev 60 760 8400 59
Kirovograd 43 94 1137 59
Luhansk 39 174 1097 122
Lvov 161 82 1102 29
Nikolaev 37 50 769 99
Odessa 131 98 870 91
Poltava 33 286 1740 64
Rovno 59 78 1479 58
Sumy 14 869 1577 137
Ternopol 522 47 642 18
Kharkov 42 488 768 155
Kherson 45 93 817 153
Khmelnitskiy 517 67 1919 59
Cherkassy 52 215 3723 47
Chernovtsy - 35 376 7
Chernigov 15 - 3083 36
City of Kiev 386 2754 - 162
City of Sevastopol
(City Council) 7 16 209 -
Annex 1309
Annex 1310
State Statistics Service of Ukraine, “Population of Ukraine for 2011.
Demographic Yearbook”, Kiev, 2012
(excerpts)
1
Translation
Excerpts
STATE STATISTICS SERVICE OF UKRAINE
POPULATION OF UKRAINE
for 2011
Demographic Yearbook
Kiev 2012
Annex 1310
2
[…]
Page 426
6.4. Interregional migration by arrival and departure areas
in Ukraine in 2011
(persons)
Arrival
area
Departure
area
Ukraine
To regions
AR of
Crimea
Vinnytsia Volyn Dnipropetrovsk Donetsk
Ukraine 258171 9490 9992 5251 13189 11608
From regions:
The Autonomous Republic of
Crimea 8027 - 190 52 561 492
Oblasts
Vinnytsia 10329 164 - 96 245 206
Volyn 4776 74 75 - 131 48
Dnepropetrovsk 14535 793 287 165 - 1408
Donetsk 13697 905 255 90 1339 -
Zhitomir 8679 146 748 138 146 108
Zakarpattia 3153 34 156 54 86 66
Zaporozhie 8571 699 120 65 1996 1046
Ivano-Frankovsk 5417 82 157 96 101 72
Kiev 15799 225 663 152 239 205
Kirovograd 8375 182 276 34 1549 203
Lugansk 9527 466 96 46 461 2373
Lvov 9434 133 335 1103 201 126
Nikolaev 6947 278 210 39 689 180
Odessa 8734 348 1201 133 324 277
Poltava 9123 161 113 46 821 299
Rovno 7764 75 146 1248 89 84
Sumy 6933 179 80 80 223 263
Ternopol 5758 76 127 159 101 59
Kharkov 15109 1018 227 167 1254 2497
Kherson 7079 834 193 42 866 292
Khmelnitskiy 9967 168 1204 131 161 118
Cherkassy 10156 141 655 36 427 173
Chernovtsy 3332 65 242 37 43 49
Chernigov 7381 139 149 61 160 133
City of Kiev 36814 721 2055 969 865 752
City of Sevastopol
(City Council) 2755 1384 32 12 111 79
Annex 1310
3
[…]
Page 430
Continuation of the table 6.4
Arrival
area
Departure area
To regions
Chernivtsi Chernihiv City of Kiev
The City of
Sevastopol
(City Council)
Ukraine 3844 7190 44977 3687
From regions:
The Autonomous Republic of
Crimea 44 114 1056 1665
Oblasts
Vinnytsia 295 159 2556 45
Volyn 62 64 1129 16
Dnepropetrovsk 62 177 1820 171
Donetsk 50 185 1928 297
Zhitomyr 53 194 3508 32
Zakarpattia 106 78 401 4
Zaporozhie 48 83 1109 222
Ivano-Frankovsk 816 46 691 7
Kiev 88 716 8520 60
Kirovograd 34 72 1138 66
Lugansk 31 140 1239 113
Lvov 169 92 1065 28
Nikolaev 50 69 845 103
Odessa 122 130 978 95
Poltava 31 257 1795 64
Rovno 66 71 1647 48
Sumy 21 870 1551 53
Ternopol 518 36 680 12
Kharkov 48 496 898 129
Kherson 44 91 842 157
Khmelnitskiy 603 99 2238 52
Cherkassy 45 204 3628 53
Chernovtsy - 27 372 9
Chernigov 33 - 3104 21
City of Kiev 381 2702 - 165
City of Sevastopol (City
Council) 24 18 239 -
[…]
Annex 1310
Annex 1311
Milliy Firqa website, “Russia recognised Milliy Firqa”,
31 July 2014
1
Translation
Russia recognised Milliy Firqa | Milliy Firqa
milli-firka.org/россия-признала-милли-фирка/
31 July 2014
Russia Recognised Milliy Firqa
The non-governmental organisation Milliy Firqa became one of the first Crimean organisations registered
under Russian law.
On 31 July 2014, a certificate of registration of the republican non-governmental organisation Milliy Firqa was
issued to Vasvi Abduraimov, Chairman of the Council of Milliy Firqa, in a solemn ceremony held in the Main
Directorate of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation of the Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol.
Annex 1311
2
MINISTRY OF JUSTICE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
CERTIFICATE
of State Registration of Non-Profit Organisation
CRIMEAN REPUBLICAN NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATION OF SOCIAL AND
CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT “MILLIY FIRQA”
(full name of the non-profit organisation)
3/5 Krylova Street, Simferopol, Republic of Crimea, 295001
(address (location) of the non-profit organisation)
The decision to carry out the state registration of the non-profit organisation upon its incorporation
was made on 16 July 2014
by the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation of the Republic of Crimea and
Sevastopol.
(full name of the authorised body that made the state registration decision)
An entry about the non-profit organisation was made into the Uniform State Register of Legal Entities
on 23 July 2014 under Main State Registration Number
1149102023377
Deputy Head
(position of the authorised person of the body that
made the state registration decision)
(Signed)
(signature)
E.O. Sotkinova
(last name, initials)
[Seal: Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation, Main Directorate of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian
Federation (illegible)]
Record No. 9112010018 Date of issue: 25 July 2014
MF-Inform
Annex 1311
Annex 1312
Mass media outlets registered during the period from 18 March 2014 to
3 June 2021, whose products are mainly aimed at the Crimean Tatar
and/or Ukrainian community and are distributed/was distributed (i) in
the territory of the Republic of Crimea, (ii) in the territory of the city of
Sevastopol, or (iii) in the territory of the Russian Federation with the
editorial office address in the Republic of Crimea and the city of
Sevastopol, 2021
Annex 1313
Roskomnadzor, List of Ukrainian printed periodicals which received
a permit to distribute the products of foreign periodicals in the
territory of the Russian Federation, as at 3 June 2021
1
Translation
List of Ukrainian printed periodicals which received a permit to distribute the products of
foreign periodicals in the territory of the Russian Federation, as at 3 June 2021
No. Title Permit
Number
Registration
Date
Registration
Country
1 Universe, Space, Time RP No. 2 3 October 2005 Ukraine
2 Crossword Puzzle Labyrinth RP No. 5 12 October 2005 Ukraine
3 Granny /Prescription for 100 Troubles/ RP No. 11 22 December
2005
Ukraine
4 Calendar of Exhibitions and Fairs RP No. 13 22 December
2005
Ukraine
5 Financial Director RP No. 10 22 December
2005
Ukraine
6 Master.Construction.Repair.Outfitting RP No. 28 23 January 2006 Ukraine
7 Autoprofi RP No. 30 23 January 2006 Ukraine
8 Domus Design RP No. 29 23 January 2006 Ukraine
9 Aerospace Bulletin RP No. 32 23 January 2006 Ukraine
10 Special-Purpose Machines in the CIS RP No. 31 23 January 2006 Ukraine
11 Pumps and Equipment RP No. 51 1 March 2006 Ukraine
12 Distribution and Logistics RP No. 50 1 March 2006 Ukraine
13 Arch Idea RP No. 49 1 March 2006 Ukraine
14 Electrical Networks and Systems RP No. 52 1 March 2006 Ukraine
15 Cosmetologist RP No. 54 28 March 2006 Ukraine
16 Nail Aesthetics RP No. 53 28 March 2006 Ukraine
17 2000 RP No. 57 28 March 2006 Ukraine
18 Humanitarian Environmental Journal RP No. 56 28 March 2006 Ukraine
19 Uhk Team RP No. 60 10 April 2006 Ukraine
20 Ukhtyshka RP No. 61 10 April 2006 Ukraine
21 Ukhmalysh RP No. 62 10 April 2006 Ukraine
22 ComicsUkha RP No. 59 10 April 2006 Ukraine
23 Powder Metallurgy RP No. 66 28 April 2006 Ukraine
24 Vegetable Farming RP No. 63 28 April 2006 Ukraine
25 Gorgeous Manor RP No. 64 28 April 2006 Ukraine
26 CABARET RP No. 70 28 May 2006 Ukraine
27 Autocar RP No. 69 3 June 2006 Ukraine
28 New Trade RP No. 74 8 June 2006 Ukraine
29 Summer Resident RP No. 71 8 June 2006 Ukraine
30 Real Master RP No. 72 8 June 2006 Ukraine
31 International scientific journal “Practical
Mechanics”
RP No. 73 16 June 2006 Ukraine
32 Landscape Plus RP No. 77 19 June 2006 Ukraine
33 Foods & Drinks RP No. 76 23 June 2006 Ukraine
34 Modelist RP No. 79 21 July 2006 Ukraine
35 Restaurateur RP No. 82 24 August 2006 Ukraine
36 Carte Blanche RP No. 84 24 August 2006 Ukraine
37 Superhard Materials RP No. 83 24 August 2006 Ukraine
38 Company Management RP No. 85 24 August 2006 Ukraine
39 Food & Drinks RP No. 75 24 August 2006 Ukraine
40 Artillery and Small Arms RP No. 86 24 August 2006 Ukraine
41 К9 RP No. 81 24 August 2006 Ukraine
Annex 1313
2
42 Journal of Mathematical Physics, Analysis,
and Geometry
RP No. 80 24 August 2006 Ukraine
43 Economic News daily newspaper RP No. 102 25 August 2006 Ukraine
44 New Staff RP No. 94 25 August 2006 Ukraine
45 Crisis Management RP No. 88 25 August 2006 Ukraine
46 Management and Manager RP No. 95 25 August 2006 Ukraine
47 Expert Ukraine RP No. 100 25 August 2006 Ukraine
48 Efficient Poultry Farming RP No. 89 25 August 2006 Ukraine
49 Power Industry News RP No. 65 25 August 2006 Ukraine
50 Safari-Ukraine RP No. 92 25 August 2006 Ukraine
51 Digital Photographer RP No. 87 25 August 2006 Ukraine
52 Ecology and Industry RP No. 101 25 August 2006 Ukraine
53 Marketing Department RP No. 93 25 August 2006 Ukraine
54 PR-Manager RP No. 90 25 August 2006 Ukraine
55 Endodontic Practice RP No. 91 25 August 2006 Ukraine
56 Voice of the Universe RP No. 103 25 August 2006 Ukraine
57 Expert Ukraine RP No. 99 25 August 2006 Ukraine
58 Locomotive-inform RP No. 97 1 September
2006
Ukraine
59 GRAIN RP No. 96 1 September
2006
Ukraine
60 Shipbuilding and Ship Repair RP No. 105 25 September
2006
Ukraine
61 Technical Gases RP No. 104 25 September
2006
Ukraine
62 Topical Economic Issues RP No. 106 25 September
2006
Ukraine
63 Satellite RP No. 109 10 November
2006
Ukraine
64 Property Times RP No. 108 10 November
2006
Ukraine
65 Trade Expert RP No. 110 10 November
2006
Ukraine
66 Marine Environmental Journal RP No. 113 26 December
2006
Ukraine
67 Hope of the Planet RP No. 112 26 December
2006
Ukraine
68 Hostile Takeovers in Ukraine RP No. 114 14 February 2008 Ukraine
69 Facts About Animals for All Kids RP No. 121 24 April 2008 Ukraine
70 Hunting and Fishing RP No. 132 15 August 2008 Ukraine
71 Be Kind RP No. 131 15 August 2008 Ukraine
72 AQUATERRA.ua RP No. 134 22 August 2008 Ukraine
73 The World of Automation RP No. 133 22August 2008 Ukraine
74 Land Improvement RP No. 138 18 September
2008
Ukraine
75 Dialogue (best stories + answers to
questions + love)
RP No. 137 18 September
2008
Ukraine
76 Patent Attorney’s Bulletin RP No. 135 18 September
2008
Ukraine
77 Ecology Plus RP No. 136 18 September
2008
Ukraine
78 Ports of Ukraine Plus RP No. 147 19 September
2008
Ukraine
79 Photographer RP No. 143 19 September
2008
Ukraine
Annex 1313
3
80 Magic English RP No. 139 19 September
2008
Ukraine
81 Metallurgical Processes and Equipment RP No. 149 19 September
2008
Ukraine
82 Noosphere Education RP No. 142 19 September
2008
Ukraine
83 English for Everybody RP No. 140 19 September
2008
Ukraine
84 Machine Vibration: Measurement,
Reduction, Protection
RP No. 148 19 September
2008
Ukraine
85 Concrete and Reinforced Concrete in
Ukraine
RP No. 141 19 September
2008
Ukraine
86 Radiotechnics RP No. 145 19 September
2008
Ukraine
87 Excise Tax RP No. 144 19 September
2008
Ukraine
88 Industrial Hydraulics and Pneumatics RP No. 146 19 September
2008
Ukraine
89 UHmalysh RP No. 153 12 January 2009 Ukraine
90 Uhtyshka RP No. 154 13 January 2009 Ukraine
91 Familia RP No. 178 10 September
2009
Ukraine
92 News of Higher Educational Institutions.
Radio Electronics
RP No. 179 10 September
2009
Ukraine
93 RING RP No. 180 15 September
2009
Ukraine
94 Native Newspaper RP No. 192 6 November
2009
Ukraine
95 Family Estate RP No. 193 6 November
2009
Ukraine
96 Intelligent Design RP No. 190 6 November
2009
Ukraine
97 BULLETIN OF HUNTER AND
FISHERMAN
RP No. 189 6 November
2009
Ukraine
98 Mediasat RP No. 186 6 November
2009
Ukraine
99 Scientific and Technical Journal “Problems
of Management and Informatics”
RP No. 187 6 November
2009
Ukraine
100 General Aviation RP No. 191 6 November
2009
Ukraine
101 Marketing and Advertising RP No. 185 6 November
2009
Ukraine
102 English4U. Magazine for English
Language Learners
RP No. 184 6 November
2009
Ukraine
103 Young Designer Modeler RP No. 188 6 November
2009
Ukraine
104 International Scientific and Technical
Journal “Wagon Park”
RP No. 195 22 December
2009
Ukraine
105 WOMEN’S MAGAZINE RP No. 194 22 December
2009
Ukraine
106 International information and technical
magazine “Locomotive-Inform”
RP No. 196 22 December
2009
Ukraine
107 ICE AGE 3: AGE OF THE DINOSAURS RP No. 197 22 December
2009
Ukraine
108 ICE AGE 3: AGE OF THE DINOSAURS RP No. 200 29 January 2010 Ukraine
Annex 1313
4
109 Doublet RP No. 202 11 June 2010 Ukraine
110 EGO RP No.207 11 June 2010 Ukraine
111 Radiohobby RP No. 206 11 June 2010 Ukraine
112 Energy and Electrification RP No. 203 11 June 2010 Ukraine
113 WOMEN’S HEALTH MAGAZINE RP No. 205 11 June 2010 Ukraine
114 Own Game RP No. 204 11 June 2010 Ukraine
115 Jazz RP No. 214 24 September
2010
Ukraine
116 Nastenka RP No. 216 24 September
2010
Ukraine
117 Apiary, bee, health RP No. 215 24 September
2010
Ukraine
118 Metallurgical and mining industry RP No. 219 24 September
2010
Ukraine
119 Recipes from Oksana RP No. 210 24 September
2010
Ukraine
120 Wheel of Life RP No. 211 24 September
2010
Ukraine
121 Proposition RP No. 210 24 September
2010
Ukraine
122 Indoor plants RP No. 212 24 September
2010
Ukraine
123 Vegetables and Fruit RP No. 217 24 September
2010
Ukraine
124 Minaret RP No. 218 24 September
2010
Ukraine
125 POP IDOL RP No. 223 24 January 2011 Ukraine
126 Dinner is served! RP No. 227 11 February 2011 Ukraine
127 Ancestral Faith RP No. 231 11 February 2011 Ukraine
128 Kuzya RP No. 224 14 February 2011 Ukraine
129 Embroidered Paintings RP No. 230 14 February 2011 Ukraine
130 Delicious and simple RP No. 226 14 February 2011 Ukraine
131 Wellness RP No. 229 14 February 2011 Ukraine
132 Crossword Puzzle Boom RP No. 225 14 February 2011 Ukraine
133 Ideal Home RP No. 228 14 February 2011 Ukraine
134 Energy Technologies and Resource Saving RP No. 233 16 June 2011 Ukraine
135 “Poznaika” children’s magazine RP No. 234 16 June 2011 Ukraine
136 Flowers and Lawns RP No. 236 2 September
2011
Ukraine
137 Vegetables and Fruit RP No. 237 2 September
2011
Ukraine
138 Cosmetologist RP No. 238 2 September
2011
Ukraine
139 Nail Aesthetics RP No. 239 2 September
2011
Ukraine
140 MAKEUP RP No. 240 2 September
2011
Ukraine
141 Photographer RP No. 241 7 September
2011
Ukraine
142 Lunar Calendar. Daily Recommendations RP No. 252 14 September
2011
Ukraine
143 GREAT ACTORS RP No. 243 6 October 2011 Ukraine
144 Thermoelectricity RP No. 253 14 October 2011 Ukraine
145 Magic RP No. 251 14 October 2011 Ukraine
146 Modern Orthodontics RP No. 249 14 October 2011 Ukraine
Annex 1313
5
147 Alternative Fuel RP No. 247 14 October 2011 Ukraine
148 LQ RP No. 246 14 October 2011 Ukraine
149 Flowers and Lawns RP No. 248 14 October 2011 Ukraine
150 MURATOR RP No. 244 14 October 2011 Ukraine
151 SPIKELET RP No. 257 6 April 2012 Ukraine
152 Orthopedics, Traumatology and Prosthetics RP No. 259 24 April 2012 Ukraine
153 Electrician. International electrotechnical
journal
RP No. 258 24 April 2012 Ukraine
154 Land Benefactress RP No. 261 2 May 2012 Ukraine
155 House, Garden, Kitech Garden RP No. 263 21 June 2012 Ukraine
156 Pedagogy, Psychology and Socionics of
Education
RP No. 264 21 June 2012 Ukraine
157 Young Modeler - Designer Technician RP No. 269 25 September
2012
Ukraine
158 Delicious Cooking RP No. 267 25 September
2012
Ukraine
159 Land - My Benefactress RP No. 266 25 September
2012
Ukraine
160 Radioamateur. International Amateur
Radio Magazine
RP No. 268 25 September
2012
Ukraine
161 Balapan Bagy RP No. 270 28 November
2012
Ukraine
162 Land - My Benefactress RP No. 272 3 December 2012 Ukraine
163 Auto-Master RP No. 274 14 May 2013 Ukraine
164 Crocodile in Ukraine RP No. 275 14 May 2013 Ukraine
165 HR Manager RP No. 280 2 September
2013
Ukraine
166 Manual Wonders RP No. 286 3 December 2013 Ukraine
167 The Spire! RP No. 285 3 December 2013 Ukraine
168 Auto-Master RP No. 288 10 January 2014 Ukraine
169 Plant Physiology and Genetics RP No. 291 5 May 2014 Ukraine
170 UNIVERSE RP No. 294 25 August 2014 Ukraine
171 Save Our Souls RP No. 293 25 August 2014 Ukraine
172 PERSONS RP No. 299 10 July 2015 Ukraine
173 International professional magazine
“Wagon Park”
RP No. 300 12 November
2015
Ukraine
174 Love and Light Territory RP No. 302 16 November
2015
Ukraine
175 International professional magazine
“Locomotive-Inform”
RP No. 301 16 November
2015
Ukraine
176 Parent Committee RP No. 310 10 May 2016 Ukraine
177 Pharmaceutical Industry RP No. 342 15 June 2020 Ukraine
Deputy Head (Signed) M.E. Vagner
Annex 1313
Annex 1314
Website of the Mejlis, Resolution of the 2nd (Extraordinary) Session of
the 3rd Qurultay of the Crimean Tatar People, 20 December 1997
1
Translation
http://qtmm.org/public/images/ckeditor/file/quick-folder/dokumenty 3 sessii 2 kurultaya.doc
Resolution
of the Extraordinary Session
of the 3rd Qurultay of the Crimean Tatar People
“On Measures to Overcome the Crisis
in the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People”
On 26 November 1997, a number of members of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People sent to various
news agencies and print media an appeal signed by them addressed to the delegates of the Qurultay of the
Crimean Tatar People.
Several accusations were advanced in this appeal against the Chairman and other members of the Mejlis
of the Crimean Tatar People, “Imdat” Bank, and Crimea Foundation established by the decision of the 2nd
Qurultay of the Crimean Tatar People.
On examining all arguments and assertions of the authors of the appeal, the extraordinary session of the
Qurultay found them unsubstantiated and biased. That fact alone that the above group, knowing that the issues
raised in their appeal formed part of the agenda that would be necessarily addressed in detail in the upcoming
session of the Qurultay, sent its document not to the session or delegates of the Qurultay but above all to news
agencies, indicates that this group does not intend to contribute to the civilised and unbiased consideration of
the said issues but attempts to exert pressure on the delegates of the Qurultay and impose their point of view
on the latter.
Besides, the authors of the appeal could not help but anticipate that such action would undermine the
prestige of the Qurultay of the Crimean Tatar People and the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People elected by it
and contribute to the revival and strengthening of forces operating against the unity of the Crimean Tatar
people and obstructing the restoration of its legitimate rights.
Violations in supervision over the intended use of budget funds cannot serve as an excuse for the
conclusions made by the authors of the appeal, moreover, for the purpose of a large-scale propaganda campaign
– since the relevant governmental authorities have been aware of these violations for a long time and have
been taking necessary action.
Some members of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People who signed the appeal have been taking
destructive action within the Mejlis for a long time, which resulted in the division of the Mejlis, impaired the
system of national self-governing bodies, and damaged the prestige of the Crimean Tatar National Movement.
In view of the above, the extraordinary session of the Qurultay of the Crimean Tatar People
Resolves:
1. to confirm the powers of Mustafa Dzhemilev, Chairman of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People.
2. to remove from the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People: Reshat Ablaev, Enver Ametov, Lennur Arifov,
Lilya Budzhurova, Rustem Karashaev, Server Kerimov, Khubedin Kurtbedinov, Bekir Kurtosmanov,
Ruslan Kurtseitov, Server Tairov, Izzet Khairov, Ziya Khalikova, Emir Medzhitov, Seitkhalil Dzhaksin,
Sadyk Berberov, Niyazi Selimov.
3. to remove Enver Muedinov from the Supervisory Committee of the Qurultay of the Crimean Tatar People.
4. to hold additional elections to the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People and the Supervisory Committee of the
Qurultay of the Crimean Tatar People.
5. As a temporary measure for a time period until the 4th Qurultay, to vest the following powers with the
Chairman of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People:
- when members of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People are elected, to reject up to one third of
nominees without consideration and voting;
- to veto decisions of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People which can be overcome by two thirds of
votes of members of the Mejlis;
Annex 1314
2
- to create executive and advisory bodies under the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People;
- to convene extraordinary sessions of the Qurultay if the decision of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar
People is supported by at least one third of members of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People.
6. to instruct the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People to elaborate a procedure under which a delegate of the
Qurultay of the Crimean Tatar People can be potentially removed and to submit the same to the regular
session of the Qurultay of the Crimean Tatar People for approval.
7. until the regular session of the Qurultay of the Crimean Tatar People, to vest the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar
People with a power to approve and remove the First Deputy Chairman upon the recommendation of the
Chairman of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People.
8. To support the decision of the Supervision Committee of the Qurultay of the Crimean Tatar People of 4
November 1997 and to approve Ayder Mustafaev as Chairman of the Supervisory Committee.
9. the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People:
- to develop and implement efficient supervision measures relating to the use of funds directed at the
achievement of goals connected with the return and settlement of the Crimean Tatar people;
- to resume and improve the work of the Advisory Council for supervision over the efficient use of funds
directed at the return and settlement programme for Crimean Tatars;
- to address the question of confidence in persons that the previous composition of the Mejlis of the
Crimean Tatar People recommended to be appointed to important positions in various governmental
bodies.
20 December 1997
Annex 1314
Annex 1315
FederalPress, “Court of Nizhnevartovsk convicted a member of a
terrorist organization”, 26 April 2006
Translation
Court of Nizhnevartovsk convicted a member of a terrorist organization
https://fedpress.ru/news/russia/policy/156438
© Expert channel “UralPolit.Ru”
26 April 2006
By the decision of the Nizhnevartovsk City Court, Ismoil Nurmatov, a citizen of Uzbekistan,
was found guilty of committing a crime under Part 2 of Article 282.2, Part 1 of Article 205.1 of
the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.
By the decision of the Nizhnevartovsk City Court, Ismoil Nurmatov, a citizen of Uzbekistan, was
found guilty of committing a crime under Part 2 of Article 282.2, Part 1 of Article 205.1 of the
Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. He was accused of participating in the activities of the
terrorist organization “Hizb ut-Tahrir al-Islami”, the Islamic Party of Liberation, the press office of
the Prosecutor’s Office of the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Area reports.
Nurmatov, being a citizen of Uzbekistan and having reliable knowledge of that the said political party
is banned in the Russian Federation, became a member thereof. He was involved in the political
activity for a significant period of time and kept the party’s literature in his apartment – brochures in
a foreign language titled “How Caliphate Was Destroyed”, “From the Life of Followers of Allah”,
“Dalals of Hizb ut-Tahrir”, “Al-Wai” and “Soznaniye” magazines, and leaflets.
By the decision of the Nizhnevartovsk City Court, Nurmatov was found guilty of committing a crime
under Part 2 of Article 282.2, Part 1 of Article 205.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation
and sentenced to 4 years and 3 months of imprisonment in a general regime penal colony.
It should be noted that, according to mass media reports, the organization is most active in the
traditionally Muslim areas of the country – the North Caucasus and the Volga Region. However,
according to the Ministry of Internal Affairs, extremist organizations have recently appeared in other
regions as well. According to certain sources in the Ministry of Internal Affairs, “the movement of
extremists to Tyumen Oblast can be explained in part by a large number of Muslims working on a
rotational basis in the oil industry of this region.”
Note of the UralPolit.Ru: “Hizb ut-Tahrir al-Islami”, the “Islamic Party of Liberation”, is a
transnational Islamic religious and political organization of Sunni Islam. According to the available
information, it was established in 1952 in Jerusalem by a judge of Sharia-based court of appeal Taqi
al-Din al-Nabhani on the basis of a fraction of the “Muslim Brotherhood Movement”. Its long-term
political program is the return to the fundamental virtues of Islam; overthrow of secular regimes and
creation of the United Islamic State Caliphate. Its supreme leader (amir) is Abdul Qadeem Zallum
(based in Jordan). The exact number of members of the organization is unknown. The party members
take a special oath and are characterized by a high level of fanaticism, ascetism, discipline and
readiness for sacrifice. Its main activity is propaganda aimed at the forceful change of state order.
The legal branches of the party are active in Jordan, Tunisia, Palestine, Kuwait, the USA, France,
Germany, Norway, Sweden, China, and Japan. In Russia, the activity of the organization is banned
by the decision of the Supreme Court of 14 February 2003.
Annex 1315
FederalPress
Annex 1316
Federal Constitutional Law No. 1-FKZ ”On amending Article 4 of the
Federal Constitutional Law ‘On the admission of the Republic of
Crimea into the Russian Federation and the formation of new
constituent entities within the Russian Federation - the Republic of
Crimea and the federal city of Sevastopol’”, 11 June 2021
1
Translation
(Coat of Arms)
RUSSIAN FEDERATION
FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
On Amending Article 4 of the Federal Constitutional Law “On the admission of the Republic of
Crimea into the Russian Federation and the formation of new constituent entities within the Russian
Federation - the Republic of Crimea and the federal city of Sevastopol”
Approved by the State Duma on 26 May 2021
Approved by the Federation Council on 2 June 2021
Article 1
To amend Article 4 of the Federal Constitutional Law of 21 March 2014 No. 6-FKZ “On the admission
of the Republic of Crimea into the Russian Federation and the formation of new constituent entities within the
Russian Federation - the Republic of Crimea and the federal city of Sevastopol” Legislation Bulletin of the
Russian Federation, 2014, No. 12, Art. 1201; 2015, No.1, Art. 1) as follows:
[Bar code: 2100052984919]
1) part 4 shall be hereby amended to read as follows:
“4. Citizens of the Russian Federation who were recognized as such in accordance with part 1 of this
Article and who received an identity document of a citizen of the Russian Federation, as well as the citizens
of the Russian Federation who were citizens of Ukraine and permanently resided on the territory of the
Republic of Crimea or Federal City of Sevastopol as of the date of the admission of the Republic of Crimea
into the Russian Federation and the formation of new constituent entities within the Russian Federation, and
who acquired or submitted applications for the acquisition of citizenship of the Russian Federation before the
date of the admission of the Republic of Crimea into the Russian Federation and the formation of new
constituent entities within the Russian Federation, shall be recognized to be citizens of the Russian Federation
not having citizenship of Ukraine, provided they submit a statement of reluctance to be citizens of Ukraine.”;
2) the following parts 5-7 shall be added:
“5. Citizens of the Russian Federation who as of the date of the admission of the Republic of Crimea into
the Russian Federation and the formation of new constituent entities within the Russian Federation were minor
children, whose only parent is or whose both parents are citizens of the Russian Federation mentioned in part
4 of this Article, including the adopted children who were citizens of Ukraine, shall be recognized to be citizens
of the Russian Federation not having citizenship of Ukraine, provided they submit a statement of reluctance to
be citizens of Ukraine after reaching the age of eighteen.
Annex 1316
2
6. The statement of reluctance to be a citizen of Ukraine mentioned in parts 4 and 5 of this Article shall
be submitted with the federal executive authority responsible for elaboration and implementation of state
policy and statutory regulation in the sphere of migration. Alongside the said statement, documents confirming
their Ukrainian citizenship shall be submitted. Citizens of the Russian Federation who were citizens of Ukraine
and who permanently resided in the Republic of Crimea or Federal City of Sevastopol as of the date of the
admission of the Republic of Crimea into the Russian Federation and the formation of new constituent entities
within the Russian Federation, and who acquired or submitted applications for the acquisition of citizenship
of the Russian Federation before the date of the admission of the Republic of Crimea into the Russian
Federation and the formation of new constituent entities within the Russian Federation, shall also submit the
documents confirming their permanent residence in the Republic of Crimea or Federal City of Sevastopol as
of the date of the admission of the Republic of Crimea into the Russian Federation and the formation of new
constituent entities within the Russian Federation.
7. The provisions of the laws of the Russian Federation that establish limitations in relation to the citizens
of the Russian Federation who hold citizenship of a foreign state do not apply to the citizens of the Russian
Federation who under parts 4 and 5 of this Article were recognized to be Russian citizens not holding the
Ukrainian citizenship and who do not hold citizenship of any other state.”.
Article 2
This Federal Constitutional Law comes into effect as of 1 July 2021.
[Seal: President of the Russian Federation * 5 * Secretariat]
President
of the Russian Federation V. Putin
Moscow, Kremlin
11 June 2021
No. 1-FKZ
Annex 1316
Annex 1317
UNIAN, “Baloha admits involvement in funding Right Sector”,
23 July 2015
Annex 1318
Hromadske, “Far-Right Group C14 Wins Funding From Ukrainian
Government”, 14 June 2018
Annex 1319
Unified State Register of Cultural Heritage Sites (Historical and
Cultural Monuments) of the Peoples of the Russian Federation, entries
for the “Moscow Kremlin” and the “Khan’s Palace”, 14 July 2021
(excerpts)
1
Translation
Excerpts
Public data of the Ministry of Culture of Russian Federation
Information from the Unified State Register of Cultural Heritage Sites (Historical and Cultural
Monuments) of the Peoples of the Russian Federation
[Source: https://opendata.mkrf.ru/opendata/7705851331-egrkn/]
[…]
Page 1
[…]
PASSPORT TABLE MAP Scheme: 6 of 14 July 2021 Data: 50 of 14 July 2021
Filter Khan’s Palace of the Republic of Crimea
Object Number in
register
Region Full
address
Category
of
historical
and
cultural
significan
ce
Object
type
Affiliati
on with
UNESC
O
Especial
ly
valuable
object
On
the
ma
p
Khan’s
Palace
9115203579
70006
Republ
ic of
Crimea
Republic of
Crimea,
Bakhchisar
ay District,
Bakhchisar
ay, 133
Rechnaya
St.
Federal
significan
ce
Ensemb
le
No No
[…]
Annex 1319
2
Page 2
[…]
Information from the Unified State Register of Cultural Heritage Sites
(Historical and Cultural Monuments) of the Peoples of the Russian
Federation
[…]
PASSPORT TABLE MAP Scheme: 6 of 14 July 2021 Data: 50 of 14 July 2021
Filter Moscow Kremlin – Ensemble of architectural monuments
Object Register
umber
Region Full
address
Category
of
historical
and
cultural
significan
ce
Object
type
Affiliati
on with
UNESC
O
Especial
ly
valuable
object
On
the
map
Moscow
Kremlin –
Ensemble of
architectural
monuments
of the 15th–
16th, 17th,
18th, 19th
centuries
7715203021
10006
Mosco
w
Moscow,
Kremlin
Federal
significan
ce
Ensemb
le
Yes Yes
[…]
Annex 1319
Annex 1320
RIA Novosti, “The Ukrainian Community of Crimea calls on Kiev to
stay out of Russia’s affairs”, 15 November 2017
(excerpts)
Translation
Excerpts
RIA Novosti (RIA News)
12:22 15 November 2017
The Ukrainian Community of Crimea calls on Kiev to stay out of Russia’s affairs
ria.ru/20171115/1508855263.html
[…]
SIMFEROPOL, 15 November – RIA Novosti, Viktor Lyashchenko. Kiev invents cases
of violations of human rights in Crimea instead of dealing with the problems of its country
– Anastasia Gridchina, acting Chairman of the Ukrainian community of the peninsula, told
RIA Novosti.
[…]
Annex 1320
Annex 1321
Letter of the Co-Agent of Ukraine to the President of the
International Court of Justice, 18 January 2019
151573 18 ^ п и а гу 2019
\\• !Ь геРегепсе !о 1Ье сазе сопсегшп § АррПса !юп оР !Ье 1п !егпа !юпа 1 Сопуепйоп Рог !Ье
5ирргеззюп оР !Ье Ртапста оРТеггопзт апс ! оР !Ье 1п !егпа !юпа ! Сопуепйоп оп !Ье ЕНтта !юп
оР АН Рогтз оР Касга ! Р 1зсптта !юп Шкгате V. Кизз 1ап Рес 1ега !юп ), I Ьауе !Ье Ьопоиг !о
аскпо \у 1ес 1§е гесе 1р ! оР а 1еИег Ргот Меззг . ЬоЬасЬ апс ! Ьик 1уап !8еу с 1а !ес 1 18 1апиагу 2019 апс !
гесе 1уед т !Ье Ке §1з !гу оп {Не зате с !ау ипс !ег соуег оР а 1е !!ег а 1зо с !а !ес ! 18 Дапиагу 2019 Ргот
Н .Е . Мг . А . 8Ьи 1§т ? АтЬаззаёог оР !Ье Кизз 1ап Рес 1ега !юп !о !Ье Клп §с 1от оР !Ье Т • е !Ьег 1апс 1з .
Ву !Ьа ! 1ейег , тРогтайоп \аз • ргоуМес ! ге §агс 11п § теазигез !акеп Ьу !Ье Кизз 1ап Рес 1ега !юп
!о 1тр 1етеп 1 рот ! (1)(а ) о !' орегайуе рага §гарЬ 106 о !7 !Ье Соиг !’з Огс 1ег оР 19 Арп 1 2017
тсНса !т § рюУ 1310па 1 теазигез .
Сор 1ез о !' !Не заМ 1ейег апс ! !Ье соуепп § 1ейег Ьауе Ьееп соттитса !ес 1 !о !Ье о !Ьег Раг !у .
I а 1зо Ьауе 1Ье Ьопоиг !о !гапзгт ! !о уои Ьеге \У 1!Ь а сору оР а 1е !ег! ас 1с гез! 8ес 1 Ьу
Н .Е . Мг . Узеуо 1ос 1 СЬеп !зоу , Со -А §еп 1 оР Шгате , !о !Ье Ргез 1с 1еп ! оР !Ье Соиг !, с !а !ес 1
18^пиагу 2019 апс ! гесе 1Уес ! т !Ье Ке §1з !гу оп 1Ье зате с !ау . Ву Ыз 1е !!ег , !Ье Со -А §еп ! оР
Шгате ргоу 1с !ес 1 тРогта !юп оп !Ье 1тр 1етеп !а !юп Ьу !Ье Яизз 1ап Рес 1ега !юп оР рот !(1)(а ) оР
орега !1уе рага §гарЬ 106 оР !Ье Соиг !’з Огс !ег оР 19 Арп 1 2017 тсПса !т § ргоУ 1зюпа 1 теазигез .
Ассер !, 81гз , !Ье аззигапсез оР ту Ы §Ьез ! сопз 1с 1ега !юп .
Шз ЕхсеПепсу
Мг . РтИху ЬоЬасЬ
А §еп ! оР !Ье Кизз 1ап Рес 1ега !юп
ЬеРсге !Ье 1п !ета !юпа 1 Соиг ! оР Лизисе
ЕтЬаззу оР !Ье Яизз 1ап Рес 1ега !юп
ТЬе На §ие
Мг . Нуа Ко §асЬеу
А §еп ! оР !Ье Кизз 1ап Рес 1ега !юп
ЬеРоге !Ье 1п !егпа !1опа 1 Соиг ! оР ^з !юе
ЕтЬаззу оР !Ье Кизз 1ап Рес 1ега !юп
ТЬе На §ие
Мг . Оп §огу Ьик 1уап !зеу
А §еп ! оР !Ье Кизз 1ап Рес 1ега !юп
ЬеРоге !Ье 1п !егпа !юпа 1 Сои !*! оР ]из !юе
ЕтЬаззу оР !Ье Иизз 1ап Реёега !юп
ТЬе На §ие
Ра 1а 15 с е! 1а Ра 1х , Сагпе §1ер 1ет 2 Реасе Ра 1асе , Сагпе §1ер 1ет 2
2517 КЛ Ьа Науе - Рауз -Ваз 2517 Ю ТЬе На §ие - Ые 1Ьег 1апс 1$
Annex 1321
Annex 1321
<>1.4 9/
• Ье 11а ^ис , 1К .Ьпшжу 1 (Н ‘
И .1‘1. А 1к ик ! а|\у | АЬиич ! УизпГ
• (с ‘-;к !с 1)(
1п (ета 1юиа 1 С 'опг ! ЫМикйее
Рейсе Ра Iасе
11)е I Парне
Не : Сазе Оопсегпт ^ АррПса ^оп о !’ (Ье Ра ^егпайопа ! Союуеи ^оп Гог
Й )С $ирргсшсш оГ (Не Ршамет ^ <>Г • еггопкт ам ! о !- (Не
1Ы .сгп »(м >паё Св »уе «(го » оп (Не Е ^ттайшк оГ АН Кот *» оГ
Кас «а 1 0»8сптта (»оп (Шсгате у . К .шш »п Гсйсгайоп ):
{плотна (шп Сопсегп 1в & • Не Киззшг УОДегайоп 'в I юрКстепЫшп
о ?(Не СоипРз Опйег оГ 19АргйК 201.7
Мг . РгезМеп !:
1 Ьаус (Ье Ьопог 1о геГег 1о (Ье К .е &15(гаг ’з 1е ((ег оГ 18 ]ц !у 201.8 туШп § (Ье
Соуегптсп ! оГ I Легате 1о ргоугёе тГогта (юп оп (Ье 1тр 1етеп (а (1оп Ьу (Ье
Яиз 8!ап Рейегаиоп оГ (Ье СоигГз Огёег оГ 19 Арп » 2017 тсНса (т §, рптзюпа !
теазигез ((Ье “Огс !ег ”), апё зресШеаНу (Ьа ( (Ье Киззгап Реёсгай ’ол “|г |еГгат Ггот
тат (атт § ог нпрозтё ПтйаШпз оп (Ье аЫШу оГ (Ье Сптеап • а (аг соттиш (у
1о сопзегус йз гергезеп (а (1Уе тзШи 1юпз ,тс 1ис !т § (Ье Ме ]Н 5.”
Аз зе ! ГойЬ Ьс !о \д /, (Ье &изз 1ап Рес 1ега (юп еоп (тиез (о ую 1а (е (Ье СоигГз
Ыпё 1п % ОгсИег . К .изз 1а Ьаз ёопе по (Ьт § (о геуегзе йз Ьап оп (Ье асЙуШез оГ (Ье
Ме ]Нз - а Ьап нпрозеё т Арп 1 2016 Ьу (Ье Зиргете Соиг ( оР Сптеа а ( (Ье
гециез ! оГ К .изз 1а ,з ргозесиШг т Сптеа , апс ! зиЬзедиеп (1у ирЬеИ Ьу (Ье 8иргете
Соиг 1 оГ (Ье К .изз 1ап Рейегайоп . Аз а сЪгес ( гези !( оР (Ьа ( соп (тит § Ьап апс ! (Ье
теазигез (акеп Ьу (Ье Кизз 1ап аиЙгопйез (о еоГогсе Рц (Ье гергезеп (а (1уе
тз (йи 1юпз ог 1Ье Сптеап • а (аг реор 1е Ьауе Ьай (о гезог ( (о ех (гаог <1тагу
теазигез ]из ( (о гетат 111 ех 18(епсе .
Annex 1321
Annex 1321
• 'оПоууищ (• е Гххштее оГ (Не СоигГх ( )и !ег , хеусга ! тетЬегх о Г (• е Ме |• х
хощ >• ( (о {2.1ус (• а ! Огскч еПсеГ , Ьу арр !утд , (о (• е Сптеап еоиг (х (о ПИ 1 • е Ьап .
Г • охе еГГо • х \усгс еопч 1х 1еп (1у геЬиГГес ! он рге 1ех (иа 1, ргоссс 1ига 1 {2,гоиш 1х ,
1пс 1и 1Йп § ап аххегПоп (• а ( 1• с еошЧх шеге ипаЫс 1« сопхк !ег (• е гециех ! т (.• е
аЬхепее оГа еегПГшс ! Кихх ^ап усгхнш о • • е СоигГх ( )гс !ег , по 1\У 1(Ьй 1апс 11П ^, (• а ! (• е
аррПсаШх 1ик 1 хиЬпиИес ! а сеИШес ! усгхнш »п Икгайшп , опс оГ (• е оПкаа !
• шршщех оГ Сптеа . I )кгашс IX хтп ’1аг 1у ипа \уаге оГапу 1пс 1срспс !см 1 еГГог ! Ьу (• е
Сптеап ог кихх 1’ап а (]тмнх (га (!Уе аШИогШех (о рсП !к >и (• е оонПх 1о гсуегхе (• е
Ьап хтсс (• е Соиг ( 1ххиес 1 Их Огс 1ег .
Т • е Кпхх 1ап 1;ес 1ега 1к >п \х ГаПиге 1о гсуегхе (• ехе (пс • Чаа ! гех (пс (к )пх оп (• е
ас (1У 1(1ех оГ (• е Ме |Пх • ауе Ьееп хщшПсап (1у сотроишкс ! Ьу (• е теахигех (I 1)ах
(акеп к > спГогсс (• е соиг • трохес ] Ьап . МетЬегх оГ 1• е Ме |• х \у • о • ауе 1гёсс 1 (о
тес ! (о согк 1ис 1 (• е Ьихтехх о • • охе тхШи (к >пх • ауе Гасес ! • агаххтеп ( (гот (• е
киххшп аи (Иопаех . 1;ог ехатр 1е , (• е Ки 881ап Ке (1ега (к >п «трохей Гтех оп е 1§И (
Ме |Пх тетЬегх т Ос 1оЬег ап с ! ЫоуетЬег 2016 Гог • ок 1т & а тсе (т § а ! опс оГ
(• ек Потех . 1п аскШюп , (• е (ор 1са (1егхЫр о Г (• е Ме )• х - тЫис • п ^ кх Гогтег
е • актап Мпх (аГа 1)/.• спп 1су апс ! кх ештепЛ е • актап кеГа ( С • иЬагоу - • ауе Ьееп
ГогЫсМеп (гот еп 1епп §, Сптеа аКо ^еЛПег , такт § II йпроххЛЫе Гог (• е Ме ^х (о
сопс 1ис ( кх Ьихтехх (• еге .
ГНе соп(кш а(ю п о Г (Не Ьап оп 1Не Ме|Нх 1о 11118 ёау апё (Не еГГог(х о Г (Не
К иххкт аи(НопНех (о епГогсе 1Не Ьап §,(уе пхе 1о а |их(ШаЫе (саг оп (.Не раг( оГ
МеЩх апс] ()иги1(ау те т Ь е гх 1На1 (Неу \уП1 Ье ритхНес! Гог сопскю(т§, 1Не Ьизтехх
оГЧНохе ЬосПех. ТНа( Геаг Х1&тГ1сап(1у и п ё е гтте х 1Не аЬИку оГ (Не С п т е а п Та(аг
реор1е (.о сопхегуе 1Нохе гергехсп(а(!Уе тхШ иПопх. 8ресШса11у, 1Ье ги1ех оГ (Не
ОигиНау гецике I I 1о о г§а т/е а п е 1ес(юп е уегу Пуе уеагх т \уЫсИ (Не С п т е а п
гГа1аг реор1е хе1ее1 250 тсНу1(1иа1х 1о хегуе ах те тЬ е гх оГ 1Не С)ига1(ау. 1п (игп,
еуегу Пуе уеагх а р!епагу хеххюп оГ(Не С)иги1(ау е1ес(х 33 оГ кх т е т Ь е гх (о хегуе
оп (Не МеЩх, ап ехесийуе Ьос!у гехропх|Ые Гог гергехеп(т§ (Не т(егех(х оГ (Не
С п т е а п Та1аг реор!е шНеп 1Не Оигикау 13 по1 т хеххтп. ТНе 1ах1 е!ес1!опх (о 1Не
Оигикау Шок р!асе т Ое1оЬег 2013. Но\уеуег, Ьесаихе оГШ е хиЬх1ап11а! пхк 1На1
О и т к а у т е т Ь е гх ш оиМ хиГГег ге1г1Ьи110п Г го т Ше Киххгап аиЙюпйех, 11 Нах
ргоуеё 1трохх1Ые 1о НоМ !Ье хиЬхециеп! е!ес1!оп 1Ьа1 шах 1о Науе 1акеп р!асе Ьу
Ос1оЬег 2018. ТНе К.ихх1ап Реёегайоп шах \уе11 ашаге • Т йпх Ос1оЬег 2018
<1еас1Ппе, Ьи1 сНс! П01Н1П§ (о сНап§е 11з роПс1ех 1о сотр1у луИН 1Ых Соиг1’х Огдег.
81тЛ а г1у, 11 Нах по1 Ьееп рохх1Ые 1о еопуепе а р!епагу хехх10п оГ 1Не О иш кау,
е11Нег 1п С п т е а ог е1хе\уНеге.
1пх 1еаё , оп 12 ЫоуетЬег 2018, Ше Ригикау • еМ а сопхикайуе сопГегепсе т
Ку 1у . И \уах Г • е Пгх ! йте 111 Г • е ЫхГогу оГ 1• е Сгтеап Та 1 а 1‘ реор 1е 1\Ш апу
тее !т § оГ 1• е Оигикау • ад 1акеп р 1асе ои !х 1(!е оГ Сптеа . Оп 1у 76 оГ (• е
Ригикау ’х 250 <1е 1е §а (;ех соиМ 1гауе 11о Ку 1У 1о аиепд Ше сопГегепсе - Гешег Лап
(• е иуо -Ш ^гёх пееёеё 1о ехШЬ • хЬ а ^ио ^ит . Ах а сопзеяиепсе , (• е сопГегепсе \уах
Annex 1321
Annex 1321
• • Ые 1о 1аке ЫпсШщ с 1ее 18ЮП 8 сопсегтп & (Не Ои • Нау 'к апс ) МщНк ' мсй Vп Iсн
Лк Ию оп !у У !аЫе ор 1юи (о рго !ее 1 (Не е .\1к (енсе оПИехе гсргексп • иус 1пяи !и !ктх ,
Ню оопГегепсе \уан Гогеес ! (о гемм ! (о ех 1гаогс !тагу теазигез , т (Не Гогт о 1 а
гесоттепс !а (тп (о сопШ • е !Не 1егтз о !(Не синен ! тетЬегх оГ (Не (,)иги 1(ау апс !
Ме |Нз . ГНа ! гесощтепеМюп \уН 1 (аке е (Тее ( оп !у аКег И 1• .ч Ьееп епс 1огхес ! •
\уп ‘Ипё Ьу НаН оПНе сиггеп ! • егпЬегх оПНе Ои • Нау .
ТНе таЫ 1*1у оГ (Не (,)ит 1(ау (о гепе \у Из тетЬегзЫр (Нти &Н (Не ек 'еиопз
(На ! \уеге с 1ие (о (аке р 1асс 111 Ое (оЬег 201К 8щ • Пеап (1у ппрсс 1с 8 (Не п • зктз оГ
Ьо 1Н (Не Ои • кау апс ! (Не Ме |Пз , аз с !етоегаиеа 11у -е 1ее !ес ! гергсяеп !а !»уех о ( (Не
Сптеап ’ГаСаг реор !е . Т !• Нагт (о (Не Сптеап Та (аг соттипку апс ! Из
гергенеп 1а (1уе тзШиШтз «8 сНгесИу а 11пЬи !аЫе 1о (Не соп (тиа 1кт т Гогсе оНПе
Кизх 1ап 1;ес !ега (нт ’з Ьап оп (Не асв 'уШез оГ (Не Ме |Н 8, т с 1еПапсе оГ (Не с !еаг
кт &иа &е оГ (Не СоигГз Огс 1ег оп 1>г 0У 1Х 10па 1 Меазигез . ТНе Ьап есиНтиез (о
гергезеп ! а зщтПсап ! 1ти (а 1юп оп (Не аЫП (у оГ (Не Сптеап Та (аг реор 1е 1о
еопзегуе 1(8 герге 8еп !аПуе тзШииопз ,те 1ис !т § Ьи ! по ! Нгт 1ес ! (о (Не Ме ]Пк .
1п кит , 1п сПгес ( ук >1а 1юп о Г (Не Соиг ! "к ()гс !ег , (Не Ки 881ап 1;ес !ега (лоп Пак
Ьо !Н тап !(атпес ! апс ! (трохее ! скаеотап “1н • 1а (к >пз оп (Не аЫПЧу о С (Не Сптеап
Та 1аг соттипку (о еопзегуе 1(8 гергезеп !а (луе тз !ки 1.к >пз , те 1ис !тё (Не Ме ^Нз .”
I Легате гееаПз 1Не Соиг !"» з 1а 1етеп 1, ах геройес ! т (Не Ке §181гаг ’ 8 1е !(ег , (На ! кз
Огс !ег тс 1к -а 1т § ргоу ^зкта ! теазигез 18 Ыпс 1т & оп 1Не раг !лез . !п у !с \у оГ 1Не
Кизз ^ап Рескга ^оп ’з еоп 1т • п ]Е » Га И иге 1о сотр !у \укН 1Не СоигГз Огс 1ег , Укгате
азкз (Не Соиг ! 1о !аке а !1 арргорпа !е теазигез . Штате Гиг 1Нег гезегуез Пне п §Ы (о
гес ]иез ! ас !с !кк )па ! ргоу !ЗЮпа 1 теазигез апс ! 1о зеек гедгезз т 1Ье тегкз рЬазе о Г
11118 ргосеесНп ^ Гог (Не Кизздап РейегаУоп ’з ореп соп !етр 1 Гог 1Ыз Соиг !’8
аийюгку .
Лесер !, 81Г , 1Не аззигапсез оГ ту ЬщЬез ! сопх 1с 1ега 1лоп .
Со -А §еп ! оГ Штате
ЛтЬаззаёог Ех !гаогс !тагу апс !
Р 1е • ро 1бпйагу оГ Штате 1о
Йю Клп §с !от оГ Ше Ыейюйапёз
Annex 1321
Annex 1321
Annex 1322
Regnum, “Decision issued in Tyumen in a case on extremism in the
social media”, 5 November 2013
Translation
Regnum
Decision issued in Tyumen in a case on extremism in the social media
https://regnum.ru/news/1728040.html
5 November 2013
Tyumen Region, 5 November 2013, 11:28 – REGNUM Leninskiy District Court of Tyumen issued a decision
in criminal case against a 34-years old resident of Nizhnetadinsk District Rustam Nazyrov. He was found
guilty under Part 1, Article 282 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (incitement of hatred or
animosity as well as violation of human dignity) REGNUM correspondent was told by the press office of the
Prosecutor’s Office of Tyumen Region on 5 November.
It was established by the investigation that on 10 January 2012, Nazyrov published a video on his account in
a social media refuting allegations made against “Hizb ut-Tahrir”.
In particular, the said video refutes critical statements in relation to “Hizb ut-Tahrir” terrorist organization; the
audience is being persuaded that its ideology is correct and the need for the use of violence in inter-ethnic and
inter-religious relations is being justified, while the target audience is encouraged to be positive about it, etc.
However, by virtue of a decision of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 14 February 2003, on
application of the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation, “Hizb ut-Tahrir al-Islami” (Islamic Party of
Liberation) is recognized as terrorist and its activity is banned in Russia. Nazyrov was aware of that.
The Court sentenced Rustam Nazyrov to 8 months of community service with the deduction of 10% of his
salary in favor of the state. The court took into account his confession and repentance and the fact that he has
four dependent minor children.
Annex 1322
Annex 1323
Rossiyskaya Gazeta, “Members of Hizb ut-Tahrir cell arrested in
Crimea”, 13 May 2016
Translation
Rossiyskaya Gazeta
Members of “Hizb ut-Tahrir” cell arrested in Crimea
https://rg.ru/2016/05/13/reg-kfo/v-krymu-arestovany-uchastniki-iachejki-hizb-ut-tahrir.html
13 May 2016, 8 p.m.
Category: Incidents
Today, the Kievskiy District Court of Simferopol issued a decision to arrest four members of the “Hizb ut-
Tahrir” cell in Bakhchisaray. This was reported by the press service of the Crimean Prosecutor’s Office.
The investigator applied for the selection of a restrictive measure in the form of detention in custody. The
motion was supported by the prosecutor’s office of the Republic of Crimea. The detainees were arrested for
two months - until 11 July.
Enver Mamutov is accused of organizing of a terrorist cell in Bakhchisaray, Remzi Memetov, Zevri Abseitov
and Rustem Abiltarov are accused of participation in the activities of “Hizb ut-Tahrir”. It is known that they
were recruiting supporters in Bakhchisaray.
Members of the Bakhchisaray cell of “Hizb ut-Tahrir” were detained yesterday. The detentions took place
within the framework of criminal cases initiated by the FSB department. The head of the “Hizb ut-Tahrir”
cell is criminally prosecuted under Part 1 Article 205.5 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation
(organization of terrorist activities), and ordinary members of the cell were prosecuted under Part 2, Article
205.5 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (participation in terrorist activities). Private houses of
the detainees in Bakhchisaray and the “Salachik” café were searched. Extremist literature prohibited in the
Russian Federation was seized.
The “Rossiyskaya Gazeta” note
“Hizb ut-Tahrir al-Islami” (Islamic Party of Liberation) is an international political party founded in 1953. Its
goal is the restoration of an Islamic way of life and an Islamic state (the Caliphate). In Russia, the
organization is recognized as terrorist and was banned by the Supreme Court in 2003.
Annex 1323
Annex 1324
Interfax, “The decision against the participants of the Bakhchisaray cell
of Hizb ut-Tahrir will be announced on 16 September”,
10 September 2020
1
Translation
Interfax
The decision against the participants of the Bakhchisaray cell of Hizb ut-Tahrir will be announced on
16 September
https://www.interfax-russia.ru/south-and-north-caucasus/news/prigovor-uchastnikam-bahchisarayskoyyacheyki-
hizb-ut-tahrir-oglasyat-16-sentyabrya
10 September 2020
Rostov-on-Don. 10 September. INTERFAX-YUG [INTERFAX-SOUTH] – The Southern District Military
Court in Rostov-on-Don will hold a pronouncement of the decision in criminal proceedings against the
members of Bakhchisaray cell of Hizb ut-Tahrir terrorist organization, which is banned in the Russian
Federation, the Court’s press office reports.
“The decision against eight members of Bakhchisaray cell of the terrorist organization is to be pronounced at
15:00 on 16 September,” the report says.
The suspects Marlen Asanov, Memet Belyalov and Timur Ibragimov are accused of the crimes envisaged by
Part 1, Article 205.5 (Organization of activity of a terrorist organization and involvement in the activity of
such organization), Part 1, Article 30 and Article 278 (Preparing to seize power) of the Criminal Code of the
Russian Federation.
Ernes Ametov, Server Zekiryayev, Server Mustafayev and Edem Smailov are accused of crimes envisaged by
Part 2, Article 205.5, Part 1 Article 30 and Article 278 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Seyran
Saliev is accused of the crimes envisaged by Part 2 Article 205.5, Part 1 Article 30, Article 278 and Part 2,
Article 205.5 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.
According to the investigation, in 2016-2017 in Bakhchisaray, Asanov, Belyalov and Ibragimov organized the
activity of a branch of Hizb ut-Tahrir terrorist organization (banned in Russia), which included Zekiryayev,
Saliev, Ametov, Mustafayev and Smailov.
Asanov, Belyalov and Ibragimov were the leaders of the organization’s branch, while Zekiryayev, Mustafayev,
Smailov, Saliev and Ametov were its members responsible for propaganda of Hizb ut-Tahrir ideas among the
people and induced the local people to participation in the terrorist organization as well as conducted secret
anti-constitutional activity aimed at facilitation of forceful seizure of power and change of the constitutional
order of the Russian Federation.
It was reported that the officers of the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation detained the men in
October 2017 and in May 2018. According to the Federal Security Service, they conducted “religious and
political training” and “disseminated the ideas” of Hizb ut-Tahrir.
The charges are based on that Hizb ut-Tahrir programme provides for unification of territories with Muslim
population into a single state – the caliphate. Since Russia has such regions, the investigation believes that the
accused, who promoted the ideas of an organization banned in the country, “carried out the activity aimed at
facilitation of seizure of power and forceful change of constitutional order of the Russian Federation”.
The suspects in the case pled not guilty.
Annex 1324
2
The public prosecutor asked the court to recognize the five residents of Crimea to be members of Bakhchisaray
cell of Hizb ut-Tahrir terrorist organization and another three to be organizers thereof and to sentence them to
15 to 21 years of imprisonment in the high security penal colony. They are also charged with an attempt to
seize power in the Russian Federation.
The Prosecutor asked for 15 years of imprisonment for Zekiryayev, 17 years for Mustafayev, 17.5 years for
Ametov and Smailov and 19 years for Saliev.
The public prosecution asked the court to sentence Ibragimov to 20 years in a penal colony and Asanov to the
same term plus a fine of 800 thousand rubles, and to sentence Belyalov to 21 years of imprisonment.
All of the arrested used to be engaged in social activity.
Thus, Mustafayev is one of the founders of Crimean Solidarity movement; Asanov is a restaurateur and
philanthropist. “They believe it was their social activity that caused the prosecution,” said the defence attorney.
In January 2020, “Memorial” human rights center recognized the eight Crimean residents to be political
prisoners and demanded their release.
“Crimean Solidarity”, an unformal union of lawyers, civil journalists and activists, appeared in 2016 in
response to the arrests of the Crimean Tatars on the Peninsula in cases of terrorist orientation, which the
accused believe to be politically driven.
“Hizb ut-Tahrir” (Islamic Liberation Party) was banned in Russia pursuant to the decision of the Supreme
Court of the Russian Federation in 2003.
Annex 1324
Annex 1325
RIA Novisti Krym, “Neutralizing a terrorist: past and present of Hizb
ut-Tahrir* in Crimea”, 27 March 2019
(excerpts)
Translation
Excerpts
RIA Novosti Krym (RIA News Crimea)
Neutralizing a terrorist: past and present of Hizb ut-Tahrir* in Crimea
crimea.ria.ru/society/20190327/1116316359.html
8:38 p.m. 27 March 2019
Watch video at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yH6OI-Kyh_I
RIA Novosti / FSB of the Russian Federation
Simferopol, 27 March – RIA Novosti Krym. Russian security forces conducted another operation in Crimea
to neutralize individuals suspected of involvement in terrorism. In the course of the initiated criminal cases,
officers of the regional FSB Directorate together with the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the National Guard
of the Russian Federation detained 20 individuals involved in the activity of Hizb ut-Tahrir al-Islami*, an
international terrorist organization banned in Russia. According to data available to the law enforcement
officials, the detainees “used conspiracy measures during the meetings to spread terrorist ideology among the
inhabitants of the peninsula, recruited Crimean Muslims”.
[…]
Page 7
“With the tacit consent of the Ukrainian authorities, these sects [Hizb ut-Tahrir] spread in Crimea among the
Crimean Tatar people. Apparently, it was beneficial for the Ukrainian authorities, according to the principle
of ‘divide and rule’ - Ayder Ismailov, Deputy Mufti of Crimea, said in a commentary to the RIA Novosti
Crimea. Therefore, these structures were quite free: they distributed literature, held assemblies, rallies and
even international conferences. They had registered print publications. They created public organizations
(women’s, youth, human rights), as well as religious communities independent of the Spiritual Directorate of
Muslims of Crimea, seizing mosques. Thus, they received a legitimate platform for promoting their ideas
among the masses”.
[…]
Page 10
After the reunification of Crimea with Russia, the position of Islamic radicals changed dramatically. Crimean
law enforcement officers regularly identify and detain individuals associated with the activities of Hizb ut-
Tahrir*. For example, in early 2015, residents of Sevastopol Ruslan Zeytullaev, Ferrat Sayfullaev, Rustem
Vaitov and Yuri Primov were arrested. They were accused of organizing and participation in the activities of
the terrorist organization
[…]
Page 14
* Terrorist organization banned in Russia
Annex 1325
Annex 1326
RIA Novosti Krym, “Kurtseit Abdullayev: criminal profile”,
23 November 2017
Translation
RIA Novosti Krym (RIA News Crimea)
Kurtseit Abdullayev: criminal profile
crimea.ria.ru/incidents/20171123/1112851785.html
Detention of Mejlis Members* (19)
13:49, 23 November 2017
(updated: 15:50, 23 November 2017)
395571
SIMFEROPOL, 23 Nov – RIA Novosti Krym. Kurtseit Abdullaev is a member of the Mejlis*, which is
banned in Russia. In 2004, he was convicted for the participation in a mass brawl between the Crimean Tatar
and Slavic youth at Cotton Club bar in Simferopol, as a result of which nine people were hospitalized with
injuries of various degrees of severity, including stab wounds. Criminal proceedings were initiated in
connection with the said incident and subsequently consolidated with the case of the beating of journalists in
Simeiz.
In 2004, he and a group of Crimean Tatars attacked the film crews of the Russian “Perviy Kanal” [“First
Channel”] and Ukrainian “Inter” TV channel who arrived in Simeiz to film a report on land squatting on the
Southern Coast of Crimea. As a result, camera operators Vadim Telichev of the “Perviy Kanal” and Denis
Pogorely of “Inter” were seriously injured. Criminal proceedings under Article titled “Intentional obstruction
of lawful professional activity of journalists” were initiated in connection with the incident. The court
sentenced Abdullayev to 9 years of imprisonment.
In July 2007, Ukrainian President Viktor Yuschenko signed a decree pardoning Kurtseit Abdullaev.
According to the document, Abdullaev, who had been sentenced to 9 years of imprisonment by a Simferopol
court, was released from further service of the sentence and a 1-year period of probation was established for
him.
On 23 November 2017, Abdullayev and other members of “Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People*” were
detained by the employees of the Crimean Directorate of the Federal Security Service over extortion of a
substantially large amount of money from a Turkish citizen.
*Organization banned in Russia
Annex 1326
Annex 1327
TASS, “Number of extremist crimes halves in the course of 2019”,
17 March 2020
Translation
17 March 2020, 2:11 pm
TASS
Number of extremist crimes halves in the course of 2019
Print version, full: https://tass.ru/obschestvo/8002335
Number of extremist crimes halves in the course of 2019
Last year, about 400 individuals were brought to administrative liability for inciting hatred or enmity.
MOSCOW, 17 March. /TASS/. The number of extremist crimes halved last year after Article 282 of the
Criminal Code of the Russian Federation was decriminalized. It was announced by Prosecutor General of the
Russian Federation Igor Krasnov at the supervisory body board’s meeting where the results of work in 2019
were discussed.
“Decriminalization of a number of acts led to halving (from 1,265 to 585) of the number of criminally
punishable extremist manifestations”, Krasnov said.
Article 282 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation prescribes punishment for incitement to hatred or
enmity as well as humiliation of human dignity.
Last year, prosecutors brought approximately 400 persons to administrative responsibility for incitement to
hatred or enmity.
“Prosecutors exercised new powers to impose responsibility on persons who are guilty of incitement to
hatred or enmity based on nationality, origin, attitude towards religion (427 cases initiated and around 400
persons punished). This practice should be developed further,” – Krasnov said.
Article 20.3.1 of the Code on Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation (“Incitement to hatred or
enmity as well as humiliation of human dignity”) was introduced in December 2018.
Following requests from prosecutors, more than 81 thousand websites containing extremist and terrorist
information were blocked last year.
“Upon consideration of prosecutors’ requests, more than 81 thousand Internet resources containing terrorist
and extremist threats, including calls for mass disobedience and violent actions, were blocked last year.
Illegal information was removed from 45 thousand websites,” – the General Prosecutor said. He noted that
when interacting with security services it is important to continue protecting the information space and
resisting attempts to involve young people into antisocial radical activities.
“Given high risks of terrorism and increase of the relevant crime rates, prosecutors must pay attention to the
antiterrorist agenda. This year there will be a lot of important events in our country, including international
ones. We must take all measures within our competence to ensure antiterrorist protection of the venues,” –
Krasnov concluded.
Annex 1327
Annex 1328
Directorate of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia for the
Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol, Information note on measures
taken to assist people confined in the penitentiary institutions of the
Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol in exercising their right to obtain
Russian citizenship in accordance with Federal Constitutional Law of
21 March 2014 No. 6-FKZ “On the admission of the Republic of
Crimea into the Russian Federation and the formation of new
constituent entities within the Russian Federation - the Republic of
Crimea and the federal city of Sevastopol” and to decline to obtain it,
15 July 2021
Translation
Measures taken to assist people confined in the institutions of the Directorate of the Federal
Penitentiary Service of Russia for the Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol in exercising their
right to obtain Russian citizenship in accordance with Federal Constitutional Law of 21 March 2014
No. 6-FKZ “On the admission of the Republic of Crimea into the Russian Federation and the
formation of new constituent entities within the Russian Federation - the Republic of Crimea and the
federal city of Sevastopol’” and to decline to obtain it
In March-April 2014, the work was carried out at the institutions of the Directorate of the Federal
Penitentiary Service of Russia for the Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol to explain the provisions
of Federal Constitutional Law of 21 March 2014 No. 6-FKZ “On the admission of the Republic of Crimea into
the Russian Federation and the formation of new constituent entities within the Russian Federation - the
Republic of Crimea and the federal city of Sevastopol’” (“Federal Constitutional Law of 21 March 2014 No.
6-FKZ”) relating to the procedure through which Ukrainian citizens and stateless persons permanently residing
in the Republic of Crimea were recognised as citizens of the Russian Federation.
The text of Federal Constitutional Law of 21 March 2014 No. 6-FKZ was placed at the units and places
of mass gathering of convicts.
Persons detained at the Simferopol pre-trial detention facility and convicts serving their sentences at
the correctional facilities in Simferopol and Kerch were informed about the provisions of Russian law
concerning the procedure of recognising Russian citizenship, preserving Ukrainian citizenship, obtaining a
Russian passport (both when serving their sentences and after release from custody). This information was
published as an information note, a copy of which was handed over to the said persons against signature with
another copy attached to their personal files.
In cooperation with representatives of the Federal Migration Service of Russia (the representatives of
the Federal Migration Service of Russia were directly present at the institutions of the penitentiary system (the
“PS”) in the period in question), the relevant applications were received from the persons who opted to retain
their Ukrainian citizenship (23 persons), one copy of which was attached to the prisoners personal files, and
the second copy was forwarded to the territorial subdivisions of the Federal Migration Service of Russia in the
Republic of Crimea through the representatives of the Federal Migration Service of Russia who were present
at each institution of the PS of the Republic of Crimea in the period in question.
There was no registration of the applications for the preservation of existing citizenship.
There were no appeals as part of administrative or judicial proceedings against actions (omission) of
the bodies of the PS of the Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol (other bodies) in connection with: a)
recognition of convicts or detained people who manifested their intention to retain their Ukrainian citizenship
as citizens of the Russian Federation; b) compulsion to obtain Russian citizenship; c) preventing convicts or
detained people from manifesting their intention to retain Ukrainian citizenship (for example, by refusing to
accept such applications); d) impossibility to file an application for the retention of Ukrainian citizenship
within the established time period; e) impossibility to register the renunciation of Russian citizenship by
individuals recognised as citizens of the Russian Federation who did not want to retain Russian citizenship
(including by individuals who did not have a Russian passport).
2,987 is the number of people detained and serving their sentence at the correctional facilities of the
Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol as at 18 March 2014 who had not submitted applications for the
preservation of their existing citizenship (or for remaining stateless persons) by 18 April 2014 and who were
recognised as citizens of the Russian Federation as provided for by Federal Constitutional Law No. 6-FKZ.
Each of these individuals was provided with a Russian passport. 23 people confined at the institutions of
the PS of the Republic of Crimea as at 18 March 2014 expressed their willingness to retain their existing
citizenship (Ukrainian citizenship).
Deputy Head of the Directorate of the Federal Penitentiary Service of
Russia for the Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol
Colonel of the Internal Service
(Signed) S.S. Suvorov
15 July 2021
Annex 1328
Annex 1329
Directorate of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia for the
Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol, Information note on places
where the convicts O.G. Sentsov and A.Z. Chiygoz served their
sentences, 15 July 2021
Translation
Places where the convicts O.G. Sentsov and A.Z. Chiygoz served their sentences
According to Report of the Federal Migration Service of Russia of 6 May 2016 No. Ms-2/6-3374, O.G.
Sentsov is a Russian citizen. No Russian passport was issued to him. He resided in the Republic of Crimea
prior to his arrest and had no convictions. He was convicted on 25 August 2015 by the North-Caucasian District
Military Court of Rostov-on-Don under Part 1 of Article 205.4, Part 2 of 205 (3 charges), Part 1 of Article 30,
Part 2 of Article 66, Part 3 of Article 30, Part 3 of Article 222 (2 charges), Part 3 of Article 66, Part 3 of Article
69 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation to 20 years of imprisonment with the sentence to be served
at a high-security penal colony.
According to Article Part 4 of 73 of the Penal Enforcement Code of the Russian Federation, after the
decision entered into force, pursuant to the decision of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia made subject
to the situation existing in the penitentiary institutions (including their occupancy level) at the time of adoption
of the decision, the convict O.G. Sentsov was sent to the Federal Budgetary Institution Correctional Facility-
1 of the Directorate of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia for the Republic of Sakha (Yakutiya).
Due to the threat posed to his personal safety, the convict O.G. Sentsov was transferred to the Federal
Budgetary Institution Correctional Facility-8 of the Directorate of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia
for the Yamalo-Nenetsk Autonomous Area in accordance with Part 2 of Article 81 of the Penal Enforcement
Code of the Russian Federation. On 28 August 2019, he was sent to the Federal Budgetary Institution Pre-
Trial Detention Facility-2 of the Directorate of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia in connection with
the adoption of the act of pardon by the President of the Russian Federation, a copy of which cannot be
provided due to its limited distribution.
With regard to the use of domestic remedies provided by Russian law, it should be noted that neither
O.G. Sentsov nor his representatives applied to the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia in relation to his
transfer for the service of the sentence at the place of residence (conviction) or in the nearest region of the
constituent entity which had the capacity to accommodate this category of convicts.
Moreover, neither the convict O.G. Sentsov nor his representatives filed any requests with the judicial
authorities contesting the decisions, actions (omission) of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia. They did
not raise any complaints in relation to the conditions of imprisonment at the correctional facilities either.
Akhtem Zeytullaevich Chiygoz, born in 1964, on 11 September 2017 found guilty by the Supreme
Court of the Republic of Crimea of committing a crime under Part 1, Article 212 of the Criminal Code of the
Russian Federation and convicted him to 8 years of imprisonment with the sentence to be served at a general
penal colony. The court’s decision entered into force on 22 September 2017.
A.Z. Chiygoz was not transferred outside the constituent entity in which he was convicted.
On 25 October 2017 A.Z. Chiygoz was released from the Federal Budgetary Institution Pre-Trial
Detention Facility-1 of the Directorate of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia for the Republic of Crimea
and Sevastopol in connection with the adoption of the act of pardon by the President of the Russian Federation,
a copy of which cannot be provided due to its limited distribution. Upon his release, he left to the place of his
residence: 46 Dostluk Str., Bakhchisaray, Republic of Crimea.
There were no complaints from A.Z. Chiygoz about threats (allegedly made by employees of the
Federal Security [Service] of Russia) that he would be sent to serve his sentence to correctional facilities
outside the Republic of Crimea (Magadan Region) where conditions were barely endurable for elderly people,
including about actions (omission) of officials of the Directorate of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia
for the Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol (other authorities) in connection with the said threats.
Deputy Head of the Directorate of the Federal Penitentiary Service of
Russia for the Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol
Colonel of the Internal Service
(Signed) S.S. Suvorov
15 July 2021
Annex 1329
Annex 1330
Information and reference material on procedure of acquiring
citizenship of the Russian Federation by Crimean residents as attached
to the Letter of the Main Migration Directorate of the Ministry of
Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation No. 20/25495, 27 July 2021
1
Translation
MINISTRY OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS
OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
(Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia)
Main Migration Directorate
12a Chistoprudniy Boulevard, Bld. 1,
Moscow, 101000
Tel. (495) 214-16-18; Fax: (495) 917-82-32
27 July 2021 No. 20/25495
to No. 8054/dgpch of 13 July 2021
On the provision of information concerning the case
“Ukraine v. Russian Federation” in the International
Court of Justice
To the Ambassador-at-Large of the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation
D.A. Lobach
(Signed)
[Stamp: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia 1110
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
Reg. No. 13364
27 July 2021]
Dear Dmitry Anatolyevich,
As the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia is protecting the interests of the Russian Federation in the
case “Ukraine v. Russian Federation”, the Main Migration Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of
Russia hereby sends you signed information and reference material prepared in accordance with Annex 1 to
the letter of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia.
Annex: on 10 pages in 1 counterpart.
Yours faithfully,
Acting Head
K.O. Adzinov
[DOCUMENT SIGNED BY ELECTRONIC
SIGNATURE
Certificate 02252E7F00C2AC1A8C4539C057F0053501
Owner Kirill Olegovich Adzinov
Valid from 1 February 2021 to 1 May 2022]
Action by E.N. Makeeva
Tel. [telephone number]
Annex 1330
2
Information and reference material
1. Exercise of the right of citizens of Ukraine and stateless persons permanently residing in the
Republic of Crimea or Sevastopol1 as at 18 March 2014 to retain their citizenship of another state and
(or) that of their minor children or to remain stateless.
Under Part 1, Article 4 of Federal Constitutional Law of 21 March 2014 No. 6-FKZ “On the
admission of the Republic of Crimea into the Russian Federation and the formation of new constituent entities
within the Russian Federation - the Republic of Crimea and the federal city of Sevastopol”2 as of the date of
admission of the Republic of Crimea to the Russian Federation and the formation of new constituent entities
within the Russian Federation, Ukrainian citizens shall be recognised as citizens of the Russian Federation,
save for the persons who within one month from the said date manifest their desire to retain their citizenship
of another state and (or) that of their minor children or to remain stateless.
The requirement for admission to the citizenship of the Russian Federation established by Paragraph
“d”, Part 1, Article 13 of Federal Law of 31 May 2002 No. 62-FZ “On the citizenship of the Russian
Federation”3 – submitting an application with the competent foreign authority for the renunciation of the
current citizenship of another state – does not apply to residents of the Crimean Peninsula since the procedure
of recognition of a person as a citizen of the Russian Federation in accordance with the rules of Federal
Constitutional Law No. 6-FKZ, subject to Article 17 of Federal Law No. 62-FZ4, does not imply compliance
with any obligations, which corresponds with the position of the Constitutional Court of the Russian
Federation.5
Therefore, residents of the Crimean Peninsula who indicated their desire to become citizens of the
Russian Federation were not required to present a document confirming the renunciation of their Ukrainian
citizenship when obtaining the passport of a citizen of the Russian Federation.
Around 4 thousand Ukrainian citizens filed an application for retaining their citizenship of another
state and (or) that of their minor children or to remain stateless6 within the deadlines established by Federal
Constitutional Law No. 6-FKZ (between 18 March and 18 April 2014). By virtue of the effective migration
laws of the Russian Federation, the said category of individuals had to obtain a Russian residence permit to
continue living in the territory of the Crimean Peninsula. Thus, around 1.2 thousand people obtained a Russian
residence permit and around 2 thousand people of this category left the Russian Federation.
An application was filed in arbitrary form, with no documents presented. Applications were received
on a daily basis, including on weekends, by employees of the territorial bodies of the Federal Migration
Service (“FMS”) of Russia who were temporarily attached to the Directorate of the FMS of Russia for the
Republic of Crimea, in the following subdivisions: Directorate of the FMS of Russia for the Republic of
Crimea, Department of the Directorate of the FMS of Russia for the Republic of Crimea in the Sakskiy
District, Department of the Directorate of the FMS of Russia for the Republic of Crimea in the city of
Evpatoria, Department of the Directorate of the FMS of Russia for the Republic of Crimea in the Belogorskiy
1 Hereinafter referred to as “Ukrainian citizens”.
2 Hereinafter referred to as “Federal Constitutional Law No. 6-FKZ”.
3 Hereinafter referred to as “Federal Law No. 62-FZ”.
4 If the State Border of the Russian Federation changes under an international agreement of the Russian Federation,
persons residing in the territory, the state affiliation of which is changed, have the right of choice of citizenship (option)
in accordance with the procedure and time limits established by the relevant international agreement of the Russian
Federation. The Agreement between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Crimea on the Admission of the
Republic of Crimea to the Russian Federation and the Formation of New Constituent Entities within the Russian
Federation (signed in Moscow on 18 March 2014).
5 Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of 19 March 2014 No. 6-P “On the review of the
constitutionality of the international agreement between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Crimea ‘On
Admission of the Republic of Crimea to the Russian Federation and Forming of New Constituent Entities within the
Russian Federation’ that was not yet effective”.
6 Hereinafter referred to as “application”.
Annex 1330
3
District, Department of the Directorate of the FMS of Russia for the Republic of Crimea in the
Bakhchisarayskiy District, Department of the Directorate of the FMS of Russia for the Republic of Crimea in
the city of Kerch, Department of the Directorate of the FMS of Russia for the Republic of Crimea in the city
of Yalta, Department of the Directorate of the FMS of Russia for the Republic of Crimea in the city of
Dzhankoy, and Directorate of the FMS of Russia in the city of Sevastopol. The reception capacity and the
number of subdivisions of the territorial bodies of the FMS of Russia that accepted applications met the needs.
Information concerning the filing of applications, including by mail via the federal post office, and the
submission deadlines were published in the mass media and on the Internet.
The provisions of Federal Constitutional Law No. 6-FKZ relating to the procedure of recognition of
an individual as a citizen of the Russian Federation and the submission of applications were explained at the
institutions of the Directorate of the Federal Penitentiary Service for the Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol.
For the said purposes, persons detained at the Federal Budgetary Institution “Detention Facility No. 1 of the
Directorate of the Federal Penitentiary Service for the Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol” and those serving
their sentence at the Federal Budgetary Institution “Correctional Penal Colony No. 1 of the Directorate of the
Federal Penitentiary Service for the Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol”, Federal Budgetary Institution
“Correctional Penal Colony No. 2 of the Directorate of the Federal Penitentiary Service for the Republic of
Crimea and Sevastopol” were informed accordingly by means of information notes, one copy of which was
served on these individuals against signature and the other one was attached to their personal case files.
Applications from persons who wished to retain the citizenship of another state (23 persons) were accepted,
with one copy attached to their personal case files and the other forwarded to the Directorate of the FMS of
Russia for the Republic of Crimea.
Federal Constitutional Law of 29 December 2014 No. 19-FKZ “On Amending Articles 4 and 12 of
the Federal Constitutional Law “On the admission of the Republic of Crimea into the Russian Federation and
the formation of new constituent entities within the Russian Federation - the Republic of Crimea and the
federal city of Sevastopol” introduced amendments to Federal Constitutional Law No. 6-FKZ whereby in the
Russian Federation a person who was recognised to be a citizen of the Russian Federation by virtue of Part 1,
Article 4 of Federal Constitutional Law No. 6-FKZ and was provided with an identity document of a citizen
of the Russian Federation shall be deemed to be a citizen of the Russian Federation that does not hold the
citizenship of another state, provided such person submitted an application indicating his or her unwillingness
to hold the citizenship of a foreign state.
The FMS of Russia prepared application forms concerning one’s unwillingness to retain the
citizenship of a foreign state and certificates concerning the acceptance of such an application, and
recommended its territorial bodies to use them. The application concerning one’s unwillingness to retain the
citizenship of a foreign state is accompanied by a copy of a Russian passport and a document confirming the
citizenship of another state (for instance, a Ukrainian passport or any other document issued by the Ukrainian
competent authorities confirming Ukrainian citizenship). Once presented with the application, the abovementioned
documents of a foreign state are returned to the applicant. Applications concerning one’s
unwillingness to retain the citizenship of a foreign state are registered in paper format.
Federal Constitutional Law No. 6-FKZ does not limit the time or place for the submission of
applications manifesting one’s unwillingness to hold the citizenship of a foreign state by Ukrainian citizens
who were recognised to be citizens of the Russian Federation under of Part 1, Article 4 of Federal
Constitutional Law No. 6-FKZ. Thus, such applications used to be accepted by the territorial bodies of the
Federal Migration Service of Russia and are currently accepted by migration subdivisions of the territorial
bodies of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia.
2. Procedure for the acquisition of the citizenship of the Russian Federation by residents of
the Crimean Peninsula.
The competent authorities of the Russian Federation did not hold any campaigns among residents
of the Crimean Peninsula persuading them to acquire Russian citizenship or to abstain from submitting
applications. According to Part 1, Article 4 of Federal Constitutional Law No. 6-FKZ, by filing applications
Annex 1330
4
for the issuance of a Russian passport, residents of the Crimean Peninsula express their free will to become
Russian citizens.
To ensure that residents of the Crimean Peninsula receive Russian passports in a timely manner, the
FMS of Russia established temporary subdivisions engaged in the issuance of Russian passports in the cities
of Saki, Kerch, and Sevastopol. To do that, 219 subdivisions were initially established to gather and process
documents required for the registration and issuance of Russian passports, with employees of the FMS of
Russia and employees of the Directorate of the FMS of Russia for the Republic of Crimea (starting from 1
April 2014) receiving citizens on a daily basis, including weekends and holidays. 255 employees of the
Directorate of the FMS of Russia for the Republic of Crimea and approximately 4 thousand employees of the
FMS of Russia temporarily attached to the Directorate of the FMS of Russia for the Republic of Crimea were
engaged in this activity.
The issuance of passports of a citizen of the Russian Federation to Ukrainian citizens is carried out
in compliance with the requirements established by Part 1, Article 4 of Federal Constitutional Law No. 6-
FKZ. The fact that Ukrainian citizens and stateless persons permanently reside in the territory of the Republic
of Crimea or Sevastopol is confirmed by relevant marks (stamps) made in Ukrainian passports, other identity
documents, or other documents confirming one’s permanent residence in the above-mentioned territories (for
instance, an extract from the house register, a copy of financial personal accounts). If a Ukrainian citizen or a
stateless person has no documented evidence that he/she permanently resides in the territory of the Republic
of Crimea or Sevastopol, under Clauses 51 and 52 of the Regulation on the Procedure for Addressing the
Issues of the Citizenship of the Russian Federation approved by Decree of the President of the Russian
Federation of 14 November 2002 No. 1325, a check is performed into the circumstances evidencing that
he/she has (does not have) the citizenship of the Russian Federation1 involving mutually supporting
documents (an employment record book, a copy of an employment agreement, certificates of employment,
certificates from educational, medical institutions, military enlistment offices concerning the dates of military
registration (deregistration) or a copy of a military service card, a certificate of marriage, a certificate of birth,
testimony of relatives, neighbours, acquaintances, and so on). The check was conducted within one month. If
the fact of one’s permanent residence in the territory of the Crimean Peninsula was not established in the
course of the check, this matter was settled in court (Article 264 of the Civil Procedural Code of the Russian
Federation).
The procedure for submitting an application for the issuance of a passport of a citizen of the Russian
Federation confirming the identity of a citizen of the Russian Federation in the territory of the Russian
Federation and a list of documents to be attached thereto used to be determined by Order of the FMS of Russia
of 30 November 2012 No. 391 “On the approval of administrative regulations of the Federal Migration Service
for the provision of a public service for the issuance and replacement of passports of a citizen of the Russian
Federation confirming the identity of a citizen of the Russian Federation in the territory of the Russian
Federation”.
Ukrainian citizens and stateless persons who were recognised to be citizens of the Russian
Federation under Part 1, Article 4 of Federal Constitutional Law No. 6-FKZ (including those who for whatever
reason failed to file an application) and were provided with a passport of a citizen of the Russian Federation,
can register their renunciation of Russian citizenship of their own free will in accordance with the procedure
established by Articles 19 and 20 of Federal Law No. 62-FZ. Moreover, the matters of Russian citizenship of
individuals residing abroad fall within the competence of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia, diplomatic
missions and consular offices of the Russian Federation located abroad.2
We do not possess any information concerning any cases when acts of employees of the FMS of
Russia (other authorities) were challenged in administrative or judicial proceedings with respect to compelling
anyone to file applications for obtaining the citizenship of the Russian Federation (issuance of a Russian
1 Hereinafter referred to as “check”.
2 Article 31 of Federal Law No. 62-FZ.
Annex 1330
5
passport), unwillingness to retain one’s Ukrainian citizenship, refusals to accept applications for retaining
one’s Ukrainian citizenship.
Regulation of the legal status of Crimean Tatars.
According to the 2001 All-Ukrainian Population Census, the Autonomous Republic of Crimea had
2,024,056 inhabitants – representatives of 133 ethnicities and peoples, including 1,180.4 thousand people or
58.5% – Russians, 492.2 thousand people or 24.4% – Ukrainians, 243.4 thousand people or 12.1% – Crimean
Tatars (144.5 thousand Crimean Tatars returned to the Republic of Crimea for permanent residence before
1991, before the effective date of Law of Ukraine of 18 January 2001 No. 2235-III “On the Citizenship of
Ukraine” and, in fact, became Ukrainian citizens. Others, mostly citizens of the Republic of Uzbekistan,
acquired Ukrainian citizenship by territorial origin under Article 8 of the Law of Ukraine “On the Citizenship
of Ukraine”.
As at 18 March 2014, 1.8 thousand citizens of the Republic of Uzbekistan resided in Crimea on the
basis of residence certificates issued to foreign citizens in Ukraine since they had no grounds for the
acquisition of Ukrainian citizenship by territorial origin.
According to the data available as at April 2015, 1,100 citizens of the Republic of Uzbekistan
changed their Ukrainian residence permits for Russian residence permits.
We also inform you that for the purposes of restoration of historical justice, the political, social and
spiritual revival of the peoples subjected to the unlawful deportation and political repressions on the grounds
of ethnicity and other reasons, as well as to ease social tension in the Republic of Crimea, Federal Law of 17
July 2017 No. 77-FZ “On amending Articles 8 and 9 of the Federal Law ‘On the legal status of foreign citizens
in the Russian Federation’” was adopted.
Under Federal Law No. 115-FZ “On the legal status of foreign citizens in the Russian Federation”,
individuals who themselves or whose relatives were subjected to the unlawful deportation from the territory
of the Crimean ASSR are allowed to obtain a residence permit on a preferential basis without procuring a
temporary residence permit, provided they present a certificate of rehabilitation issued by the bodies of
internal affairs, Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation or the court.
The issuance of documents to such persons shall be carried out in accordance with the established
procedure pursuant to the rules of Federal Law No. 115-FZ.
Moreover, under Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of 29 April 2019 No. 187 “On
certain categories of foreign citizens and stateless persons entitled to apply for Russian citizenship using the
simplified procedure”, such category of people may acquire Russian citizenship in accordance with the
simplified procedure under Part 8, Article 14 of Federal Law No. 62-FZ.
3. Procedure for obtaining a Russian residence permit by residents of the Crimean Peninsula.
3.1. After Federal Constitutional Law No. 6-FKZ came into effect, inhabitants of the Crimean
Peninsula who refused to obtain Russian citizenship and within one month after that declared their desire to
preserve their current citizenship of another state and (or) that of their minor children or to remain stateless
and submitted relevant applications1, were provided with Russian residence permits in accordance with the
Administrative Regulations of the Federal Migration Service for the Provision of a Public Service for the
issuance of Russian residence permits to foreign citizens and stateless persons approved by Order of the FMS
of Russia of 22 April 2013 No. 2152 in light of instruction of the Federation Migration Service of Russia of
22 April 2014 No. AK-1/2/2-5770 “On the issuance of resident permits and temporary residence permits”
(copy attached).
1 An application concerning one’s desire to preserve their citizenship of another state that Ukrainian citizens
and (or) their children have or to remain stateless.
2 Hereinafter referred to as “Administrative Regulations No. 215”.
Annex 1330
6
To obtain a Russian residence permit, Ukrainian citizens filed the following documents with the
territorial body of the FMS of Russia at their place of permanent residence in the Republic of Crimea or
Sevastopol:
An application for a Russian residence permit in arbitrary form;
Personal photographs, 35x45 mm in size, black and white or coloured, with the face clearly visible
with a full face, no headwear;
An identity document and its copy;
A certificate of birth (for minor children) and its copy;
A document confirming one’s permanent residence in the territory of the Republic of Crimea or
Sevastopol as at 18 March 2014 (a mark (stamp) made in a Ukrainian passport; a certificate of registration of
minor children at the place of residence; a court decision concerning one’s permanent residence; other
document confirming one’s permanent residence in the above-mentioned territories) and its copy.
No documents confirming proficiency in the Russian language, knowledge of Russian history and
fundamental principles of Russian legislation were provided by the said category of individuals since the rule
in question was introduced by Federal Law of 20 April 2014 No. 74-FZ “On amendment of the Federal Law
‘On the legal status of foreign citizens in the Russian Federation’” that became effective on 1 January 2015.
Under the Administrative Regulations, a Russian residence permit was issued for 5 years within
seven business days from receipt of the relevant application.
We do not possess any information concerning any refusal or delay in the issuance of Russian
resident permits to the above-mentioned category of persons.
3.2. During the transition period established by Article 6 of Federal Constitutional Law No. 6-FKZ,
foreign citizens permanently residing in the Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol as at 18 March 2014, based
on their permanent residence certificates issued by the official authorities of Ukraine, were provided with
residence permits in lieu of the above certificates, and in accordance with Administrative Regulations No. 215
and recommendations presented in the above instruction of the Federal Migration Service of Russia of 22 April
2014 No. AK-1/2/2-5770 and instruction of the FMS of Russia of 9 June 2014 No. AK-1/2/2-8358 “On
organizing work with foreign citizens permanently residing in the Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol” (copy
attached).
No documents confirming proficiency in the Russian language, knowledge of Russian history and
fundamental principles of Russian legislation were provided by the said category of individuals since the rule
in question was introduced by Federal Law of 20 April 2014 No. 74-FZ “On amendment of the Federal Law
‘On the legal status of foreign citizens in the Russian Federation’” that became effective on 1 January 2015.
The grounds for the refusal to accept the application for the issuance of a residence permit submitted
by a foreign citizen in the Russian Federation included failure to submit one of the documents envisaged by
the instructions or submission of an invalid identity document.
4. Procedure for submitting written notifications by residents of the Crimean Peninsula
holding Russian citizenship concerning their foreign citizenship or residence permit or any other valid
document confirming the right of permanent residence in a foreign state.1
Under Article 6(3) of Federal Law No. 62-FZ,2 unless otherwise provided by an international
agreement of the Russian Federation or federal law, a citizen of the Russian Federation (save for the citizens
of the Russian Federation who permanently reside abroad) who also holds citizenship of another state or a
permanent residence permit or any other valid document confirming his or her right of permanent residence
in a foreign state, shall submit a notification with a territorial office of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of
Russia at the place of residence of this citizen in the Russian Federation (and if there is no such place – at the
place of his or her stay in the Russian Federation, and if there is no place of residence and place of stay in the
Russian Federation – at the place of his or her actual stay in the Russian Federation) within sixty days of the
1 Hereinafter referred to as “notification”.
2 As amended by Federal Law of 4 June 2014 No. 142-FZ, effective as of 4 August 2014.
Annex 1330
7
date of acquisition of foreign citizenship by, or issuance of a foreign permanent residence permit, to such
individual.
According to Part 1, Article 4 of Federal Constitutional Law No. 6-FKZ, Ukrainian citizens are
recognised as Russian citizens. Thus, the abovementioned category is released from the obligation to file any
notifications since such citizens did not acquire any other citizenship of another state after Federal Law No.
142-FZ of 4 June 2014 entered into force. However, if a citizen of the above-mentioned category acquired
citizenship of another state after 1 January 2016, the citizen shall be obliged to file a notification under Article
6 of Federal Law No. 62-FZ1.
5. Statistical Data.
Parameter Statistical data
1. N umber of individuals who were recognised to be
citizens of the Russian Federation in accordance
with the procedure envisaged by Part 1, Article 4
of the Law on the Admission of the Republic of
Crimea;
Over 2 million people were recognised as
citizens of the Russian Federation in
accordance with the procedure envisaged by
Part 1, Article 4 of Federal Constitutional
Law No. 6-FKZ.
2. N umber of individuals from among those
mentioned in para. 1 who were not registered in
Crimea as at 18 March 2014 and whose
permanent residence in Crimea was established
on other grounds for them to be recognised as
citizens of the Russian Federation;
Following the checks conducted in
accordance with Clauses 51 and 52 of the
Regulation on the Procedure for Addressing
the Issues of the Citizenship of the Russian
Federation approved by Decree of the
President of the Russian Federation of 14
November 2002 No. 1325, including taking
into account the court decision on
establishing the legal fact of residence in the
territory of the Crimean Peninsula as at 18
March 2014, 83 369 people were recognised
as citizens of the Russian Federation.
3. N umber of people recognised as citizens of the
Russian Federation in accordance with the
procedure envisaged by Part 1, Article 4 of the
Law on the Admission of the Republic of Crimea
who submitted applications manifesting their
unwillingness to hold the citizenship of Ukraine
with the bodies of FMS of Russia within the
framework of the procedure envisaged by Part 4,
Article 4 of the Law on the Admission of the
Republic of Crimea;
107,827 applications manifesting one’s
unwillingness to hold the citizenship of a
foreign state (Ukraine) were filed in
accordance with the procedure envisaged by
Part 4, Article 4 of Federal Constitutional
Law No. 6-FKZ.
4. N umber of persons residing in the Republic of
Crimea and Sevastopol as at 18 March 2014 who
submitted applications (with the offices of
Federal Migration Service in Crimea, across
Russia or through consular offices of the Russian
Federation abroad) manifesting their desire to
Applications manifesting the desire to retain
citizenship of a foreign state (remain
stateless) were accepted in relation to 3,968
people (including 207 children).
1 Article 6(5) of Federal Law of 4 June 2014 No.142-FZ.
Annex 1330
8
retain their citizenship of a foreign state
(Ukraine) and(or) that of their minor children or
to remain stateless (including minors, in relation
to whom such applications were submitted);
5. N umber of people from among those who
manifested their desire to retain their citizenship
of a foreign state (Ukraine) and (or) that of their
minor children or to remain stateless who applied
for a residence permit in Crimea and/or
Sevastopol and received it;
1,322 Russian residence permits were issued
to Ukrainian citizens who filed applications
manifesting their desire to retain their
citizenship of a foreign state (remain
stateless).
6. N umber of persons recognised as citizens of the
Russian Federation under Article 4(1) of the Law
on the Admission of the Republic of Crimea who
subsequently renounced their Russian
citizenship.
6 persons previously recognised to be
Russian citizens under Part 1, Article 4 of
Federal Constitutional Law No. 6-FKZ
renounced their citizenship of the Russian
Federation.
[DOCUMENT SIGNED BY ELECTRONIC
SIGNATURE
Certificate 02252E7F00C2AC1A8C4539C057F0053501
Owner Kirill Olegovich Adzinov
Valid from 1 February 2021 to 1 May 2022]
Annex 1330
Annex 1331
Intentionally omitted
Annex 1332
O.M. Kostikova, M.S. Lisenko, Literature Reading, 4th grade, Study
guide for general educational institutions with instruction in Ukrainian
and Russian, Prosveshchenie, Moscow, 2018
(excerpts)
1
Translation
Excerpts
Translation from Ukrainian and Russian
[O.M. Kostikova, M.S. Lisenko
Literature Reading
4th grade]
Annex 1332
2
O.M. Kostikova, M.S. Lisenko
Literature Reading
Study guide for general educational institutions
with instruction in Ukrainian and Russian
4th grade
Moscow
Prosveshchenie
2018
[…]
O.M. Kostikova
Literature Reading. 4th grade: Study guide for general educational institutions with instruction in Ukrainian
and Russian / O.M. Kostikova, M.S. Lisenko – Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 2018 – 223 p. ISBN 978-5-09-
070053-5.
The study guide provides learning of the literature reading in the Ukrainian language at the 4th grade of general
educational institutions with instruction in Ukrainian and Russian in accordance with the Federal State
Educational Standard, develops students’ skills in analysing works of fiction, developing their oral and written
speech, and enriching their active vocabulary in their native Ukrainian language
Universal Decimal Classification 373:811.161.2+811.161.2(075.2)
Library-Bibliographic Classification 81.411.4ya71
ISBN 978-5-09-070053-5
© Prosveshchenie Publishing House, 2018
© Designed by Prosveshchenie Publishing House, 2018
All rights are reserved
[…]
Annex 1332
Annex 1333
N.M. Borisyuk, Ukrainian language (Native), 4th grade, Study guide
for general educational institutions with instruction in Ukrainian and
Russian, Prosveshchenie, Moscow, 2018
(excerpts)
1
Translation
Excerpts
Translation from Ukrainian and Russian
[N.M. Borisyuk
Ukrainian language (Native)
4th grade]
Annex 1333
2
N.M. Borisyuk
Ukrainian language (Native)
Study guide for general educational institutions
with instruction in Ukrainian and Russian
4th grade
Moscow
Prosveshchenie
2018
[…]
N.M. Borisyuk
Ukrainian language (Native). 4th grade: Study guide for general educational institutions with instruction in
Ukrainian and Russian / N.M. Borisyuk – Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 2018 – 191 p. ISBN 978-5-09-070057-3.
The study guide provides learning of the Ukrainian language as native at the 4th grade of general educational
institutions with instruction in Ukrainian and Russian in accordance with the Federal State Educational
Standard and aims at developing universal learning activities and achieving the intended learning outcomes:
personal, disciplinary and meta-disciplinary.
Universal Decimal Classification 373:811.161.2+811.161.2(075.2)
Library-Bibliographic Classification 81.411.4ya71
ISBN 978-5-09-070057-3
© Prosveshchenie Publishing House, 2018
© Designed by Prosveshchenie Publishing House, 2018
All rights are reserved
[…]
Annex 1333
Volume XIV - Annexes 1214-1333