Declaration of Judge Spiropoulos (as appended immediately after the judgment)

Document Number
048-19631202-JUD-01-01-EN
Parent Document Number
048-19631202-JUD-01-00-EN
Document File
Bilingual Document File

of which will be placed in the archives of the Court and the others
transmitted to the Government of the Federal Republic of Cam-
eroon and to the Government ofthe United Kingdom ofGreat Britain
and Northern Ireland, respectively.

(Signed) B. WINIARÇKI,
President.

(Signed) GARNIERC - OIGNET,

Registrar.

Judge SPIROPOULO Sakes the following declaration:

1 do not share the view of the Court. 1consider that the Appli-
cation of the Republic of Cameroon is admissible and that the Court
has jurisdiction to examine the merits of the dispute of which it is
seised.

Judge KORETSKY makes the following declaration
1 cannot agree with the Judgment of the Court, as it has been
reached without observance of relevant rules and principles laid
down in the Rules of Court.
The Judgment was adopted in the stage of an examination of a
preliminary objection, which delimits itself quite precisely from the
stage of an examination of the ments of an Application. The Court
passed by the question of iis jurisdiction and turned to the question

of the inadmissibility of the claims of the Republic of Cameroon.
If the question of inadmissibility is raised, not on the ground
of non-observance of the purely formal requirements of the Rules,
e.g. non-observance of Article 32 (2) of the Rules, but in respect
of the substance of the Application (rationemateriae),then the Court
should first decide on its jurisdiction and subsequently consider the
plea of inadmissibility. This is a broadly accepted ru1eventure to
cite, from among many authoritative opinions, the statement of
Judge Sir Percy Spender in his Separate Opinion in the Interhandel
case (I.C.J. Reports 1959, p. 54) that the Court was obliged first
to satisfy itself that it has jurisdiction and then to treat a plea to
the admissibility of the Application. The same was said by Judge
Sir Hersch Lauterpacht in his Dissenting Opinion (ibid ..,100)
"that according to the established practice of the Court preliminary
objections must be examined-and rejected-before the plea of
admissibility is examined".

Bilingual Content

of which will be placed in the archives of the Court and the others
transmitted to the Government of the Federal Republic of Cam-
eroon and to the Government ofthe United Kingdom ofGreat Britain
and Northern Ireland, respectively.

(Signed) B. WINIARÇKI,
President.

(Signed) GARNIERC - OIGNET,

Registrar.

Judge SPIROPOULO Sakes the following declaration:

1 do not share the view of the Court. 1consider that the Appli-
cation of the Republic of Cameroon is admissible and that the Court
has jurisdiction to examine the merits of the dispute of which it is
seised.

Judge KORETSKY makes the following declaration
1 cannot agree with the Judgment of the Court, as it has been
reached without observance of relevant rules and principles laid
down in the Rules of Court.
The Judgment was adopted in the stage of an examination of a
preliminary objection, which delimits itself quite precisely from the
stage of an examination of the ments of an Application. The Court
passed by the question of iis jurisdiction and turned to the question

of the inadmissibility of the claims of the Republic of Cameroon.
If the question of inadmissibility is raised, not on the ground
of non-observance of the purely formal requirements of the Rules,
e.g. non-observance of Article 32 (2) of the Rules, but in respect
of the substance of the Application (rationemateriae),then the Court
should first decide on its jurisdiction and subsequently consider the
plea of inadmissibility. This is a broadly accepted ru1eventure to
cite, from among many authoritative opinions, the statement of
Judge Sir Percy Spender in his Separate Opinion in the Interhandel
case (I.C.J. Reports 1959, p. 54) that the Court was obliged first
to satisfy itself that it has jurisdiction and then to treat a plea to
the admissibility of the Application. The same was said by Judge
Sir Hersch Lauterpacht in his Dissenting Opinion (ibid ..,100)
"that according to the established practice of the Court preliminary
objections must be examined-and rejected-before the plea of
admissibility is examined".archives de la Cour et dont les autres seront transmis respective-
ment au Gouvernement de la République fédéraledu Cameroun et
au Gouvernement du Royaume-Uni de Grande-Bretagne et
d'Irlande du Nord.

Le Président,
(Signé) B. WINIARSKI.

Le Greffier,

(Sig91é)GARNIER-COIGNET.

M. SPIROPOULOS ju,ge, fait la déclaration suivan:e

Je ne partage pas l'opinion de la Cour. Je considère que la
requête de la République du Cameroun est recevable et que la
Cour est compétente pour examiner au fond le différend dont elle
est saisie.

M. KORETSKYj,uge, fait la déclaration suivante:
Je ne puis souscrireà l'arrêtde la Cour, en tant qu'il n'a pas été
établi conformément aux règles et principes pertinents définispar
le Règlement de la Cour.
Cet arrêtest rendu au stade de l'examen des exceptions prélimi-
naires, stade qui se distingue trèsprécisémentde celui de l'examen

de la requêtequant au fond. Négligeant la question de sa compé-
tence, la Cour a traité de la question de l'irrecevabilité des deman-
des de la Ré~ubliaue du Cameroun.
Si la question de l'irrecevabilité est soulevéenon point à raison
de l'inobservation des prescriptions purement formelles du Règle-
inent, telles que l'article 32, paragraphe2,mais à l'égard du fond
de la requête (ratione rnateriae),la Cour doit tout d'abord se pro-
noncer sur sa compétence, pour examinerensuitel'exception d'irre-
cevabilité. C'estlà une règle largement admise. Je me permettrai
de citer, parmi de nombreux avis autorisés, celui que sir Percy
Spender a énoncédans son opinion individuelle en l'affaire de
l'lnterhandel (C.I.J. Recueil 1959 ,. 54) et aux termes duquel la
Cour est tenue de s'assurer qu'elle est compétente avant de se
prononcer sur une exception ayant trait à la recevabilité de la
requête. Lemêmepoint de vue a étéexprimépar sir Hersch Lauter-
pacht dans son opinion dissidente (ibid p.,100): «les exceptions
préliminaires, conformément à la pratique établie par la Cour,

doivent être examinées - et rejetées - avant l'examen de la
demande portant sur la recevabilité ».

Document file FR
Document Long Title

Declaration of Judge Spiropoulos (as appended immediately after the judgment)

Links