Order of 9 July 2004

COURMïERNATMLEBEJUSTICE

RECUEID= ARR%TS,
AVICONSULTATIFSïORDONNANCES

AFFAIRE

DU DIFFÉREND FRONTALIER
(B~MNGER)

REPORTOFJUDGMEPJTS,
ADWRY OflNIoEANDmms

CASE CONCERNING

THE FRONTER DISPUTE CASE CONCERNING
THEFRONTERDISPUTE

niePmhht of Chamim of the intematCourtof J&
IdmLatodealiHiihcm conctrntihegrmk Dispute(BenhiNiger),

Hahg regartoWC 48 oftheSiatutd theCourtand to
mw 18,-ph 3,44and92ofthRulos ofCourt,
Hmhg regardttheSpiai Apment s@md by theRcpubliof
lBeniaarsdttteR~dNigeroa 15Jm~2Mifrindhavingeaitacdinto
f- on ILAN rn by aihithe~ m t s ortb~aitwo
agmd tosubmittoaChambeorfttaCourta dispuconceraigthe
dehitivd~~01p d thewkie boundarbctwacthmM,
Ha* re&ardto tOdM of27Novmlber2002wherebthecorn
üd 27Au@ 2ûû3 ash thdimitfoxtheîdhgofa Memorialby
etchorthePh and tn cdw of i1Scptcrnl2003w,kcby the
PresidPnitoftbChmbopkcd2$ May MfW astbtimdhit forthe
fa hm-Me~nOd by ofthem05;
Wh- th MwmrIaband lhu Counier-MernorofhBeainand
Ni havebm 834 with thabm drne-hits;
Wereas kti& 3, w h 1Te),01thabommtIond Spciai
Agmmnt @&des forthfiliofanyottieplen- IMre$ue~tedby
&theruThe Partad an&oti;e#itheChmbcr,arasdirectbythe
Chamber;
Wkw nt ameetingt- heM~ME oftheChber and th
repwm~tiw of thPWFtiMgd on2Juiy2ûû4atNich thevicwof AurhwIr~sthei%ofa%@yby 4 Party;

Fm t7~#W~Yfh6~~fot~e~bF~~
b; ad
REWW tbesahqmt prmdnm forFunbeclaision.

Doneh Fmgh$LO dW thFrqc4 mt bdq authoritaatve
thePeaa~?I~tIta~this"ninfh~oThdy, iwothousandand
htr,iii thmeEopies,oned~wiii~plrrcedithearchimofthk
Courtsinthotbe nluismi ttîoeGowmwnt oftheRepubîof
eni 4n the09ve-t ofrbe: epublcrNF, ~WIY.