Costa Rica brings a case against Nicaragua to the Court in a dispute concerning navigational and related rights of Costa Rica on the San Juan River

Document Number
133-20050929-PRE-01-00-EN
Document Type
Number (Press Release, Order, etc)
2005/20
Date of the Document
Document File

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF WSTICE

Peace Palace, 2517 KJ The Hague. Tel: +31 (0)70 302 23 23. Cables: Intercourt,
The Hague. Fax: +31 (0)70 364 99 28. Telex: 32323. E-mail address:

[email protected]. Internet address: http://www.icj-cij.org.

Press Release
Unofficial

No. 2005/20
29 September 2005

Costa Rica brings a case against Nicaragua to the Court in a dispute
concerning navigational and related rights of Costa Rica on the San Juan River

THE HAGUE, 29 September 2005. Today Costa Rica brought a case against Nicaragua to
the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the principal judicial organ of the United Nations, in a
dispute conceming navigational and related rights of Costa Rica on the San Juan River.

In its Application, Costa Rica states that "[it] seeks the cessation of [the] Nicaraguan conduct

which prevents the free and full exercise and enjoyment of the rights that Costa Rica possesses on
the San Juan River, and which also prevents Costa Rica from fulfilling its responsibilities" under
certain agreements between itself and Nicaragua.

According to Costa Rica,"Nicaragua has- in particular since the late 1990simposed a

number of restrictions on the navigation of Costa Rican boats and their passengers on the
San Juan River", in violation of "Article VI of the Treaty of Limits [, signed in 1858 between
Costa Rica and Nicaragua, which] granted to Nicaragua sovereignty over the watershe San Juan
River, recognizing at the same time important rights to Costa Rica". Costa Rica maintains that
these rights were confirmed and interpreted by an arbitral award issued by the President of the

United States of America, Mr. Graver Cleveland, on 28 March 1888, and by a judgment of the
Central American Court of Justice of 1916, as weil as by the "Agreement Supplementary to
Article N of the [1949] Pact of Amity, Washington, 9 January 1956".

lt also contends that "these restrictions are of a continuing character".

Costa Rica further argues that on 28 September 2005 the National Assembly of Nicaragua
passed a resolution (No. 17-2005), "threatening to impose economie sanctions against Costa Rica
in the event of its bringing the present dispute to the Court", to which is annexed "the text of a draft
law which would impose an import tax of 35 per cent on all goods and services of Costa Rican
origin".

The applicant adds that "[it] has proposed many times to Nicaragua a diplomatie solution as
weil as the use of available mechanisms of peaceful resolution of differences, including mediation
through the Organization of American States and international arbitration", but that "[t]he
Govemment of Nicaragua has rejected ali those alternatives".

Accordingly, Costa Rica now requests the Court "to adjudge and declare that, by its conduct,
Nicaragua has violated:

W the obligation to facilitate and expedite traffic on the San Juan River within the terms of the
Treaty of 15 April 1858 and its interpretation given by arbitration on 22 March 1888; - 2 -

.G:ùthe obligation to allow Costa Rican boats and their passengers to navigate freely and without
impediment on the San Juan River for commercial purposes, including the transportation of

passengers and tourism;

(ç} the obligation to allow Costa Rican boats and their passengers while engaged in such
navigation to moor freely on any of the San Juan River banks without paying any charges,

unless expressly agreed by both Governments;

@ the obligation not to require Costa Rican boats and their passengers to stop at any Nicaraguan
post along the river;

W the obligation not to impose any charges or fees on Costa Rican boats and their passengers for
navigating on the river;

ill the obligation to allow Costa Rica the right to navigate the nver m accordance with

Article Second of the Cleveland Award;

_(g)the obligation to allow Costa Rica the right to navigate the San Juan River in official boats for
supply purposes, exchange of personnel of the border posts along the right bank of the

San Juan River, with their official equipment, including the necessary arms and ammunitions,
and for the purposes of protection, as established in the pertinent instruments;

.(hlthe obligation to collaborate with Costa Rica in order to carry out those undertakings and

activities which require a common effort by both States in order to facilitate and expedite traffic
in the San Juan River within the terms of the Treaty of Limits and its interpretation given by the
Cleveland Award, and other pertinent instruments;

ill the obligation not to aggravate and extend the dispute by adopting measures against Costa Rica,

including unlawful economie sanctions contrary to treaties in force or general international law,
or involving further changes in the régime of navigation and associated rights on the
San Juan River not permitted by the instruments referred to above.

Further, the Court is requested to determine the reparation which must be made by
Nicaragua."

As a basis for the Court's jurisdiction Costa Rica invokes the declarations of acceptance of

the Court's jurisdiction (under Article 36, paragraph 2, of its Statute) made by Costa Rica on
20 February 1973 and by Nicaragua on 24 September 1929, as weil as the Tovar-Caldera
Agreement signed between the Parties on 26 September 2002. Costa Rica further invokes
Article 36, paragraph 1, of the Statute of the Court by virtue of the operation of Article XXXI of

the "Pact of Bogota" of 30 April 1948.

Costa Rica points out that both States had agreed a three-year standstill period between them
under the Tovar-Caldera Agreement, during which Nicaragua would maintain the legal status
existing with respect to its declaration of acceptance of the jurisdiction of the Court while

Costa Rica would not initiate any action before the Court. Costa Rica states that during this period,
"the two Parties were indeed able to make progress on a number of important issues for the Central
American region, to their mutual benefit. Unfortunately, however, the dispute over Costa Rica's
navigational and related rights on the San Juan River remains unresolved." - 3 -

The full text of Costa Rica's Application will be available shortly on the Court's website
(http://www.icj-cij.org).

Information Department:
Mrs. Laurence Blairon, Head of the Department (+ 31 70 302 23 36)

Mr. Boris Heim, Information Officer (+ 31 70 302 23 37)
E-mail address: information @icj-cij.org

Document file FR
Document Long Title

Costa Rica brings a case against Nicaragua to the Court in a dispute concerning navigational and related rights of Costa Rica on the San Juan River

Links