Note: This translation has been prepared by the Registry for internal purposes and has no official
character
18836
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
LEGAL CONSEQUENCES ARISING FROM THE POLICIES
AND PRACTICES OF ISRAEL IN THE OCCUPIED PALESTINIAN TERRITORY,
INCLUDING EAST JERUSALEM
(REQUEST FOR AN ADVISORY OPINION)
WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE KINGDOM OF MOROCCO
25 July 2023
[Translation provided by the Kingdom of Morocco and revised by the Registry]
1
Unofficial translation
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

INTRODUCTION
WRITTEN STATEMENT
OF
THE REPUBLIC OF YEMEN
25 July 2023
1. The Republic of Yemen has the honour to submit this Written Statement in accordance with
the Order of the International Comi of Justice of3 February 2023 in the matter concerning
Legal Consequences arising fiwn the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied
Palestinian Territo,y, including East Jerusalem. This Written Statement briefly addresses
the issues referred to the Court by the United Nations General Assembly in resolution
77 /24 7 of 30 December 2022.

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION
LEGAL CONSEQUENCES ARISING FROM THE
POLICIES AND PRACTICES OF ISRAEL IN THE
OCCUPIED PALESTINIAN TERRITORY, INCLUDING
EAST JERUSALEM
WRITTEN STATEMENT OF ITALY
WRITTEN STATEMENT OF ITALY
INTRODUCTION
By Resolution 77/247 adopted on 30 December 2022, the General Assembly decided, in
accordance with Article 96 of the Charter of the United Nations, to request the International
Court of Justice, pursuant to Article 65 of the Statute of the Court, to render an advisory opinion

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
LEGAL CONSEQUENCES ARISING FROM THE
POLICIES AND PRACTICES OF ISRAEL IN THE OCCUPIED PALESTINIAN TERRITORY, INCLUDING EASTERN JERUSALEM
(REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION)
Written Comments of the Principality of Liechtenstein
Pursuant to the Order of the Court of 3 February 2023
17 July 2023
1

VOLUME II
ANNEXES
24 July 2023
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
REQUEST FOR AN ADVISORY OPINION BY THE UNITED NATIONS
GENERAL ASSEMBLY IN RESOLUTION 77/247 OF 30 DECEMBER 2022
PERTAINING TO THE QUESTION OF PALESTINE
WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE STATE OF PALESTINE

VOLUME I
24 July 2023
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
REQUEST FOR AN ADVISORY OPINION BY THE UNITED NATIONS
GENERAL ASSEMBLY IN RESOLUTION 77/247 OF 30 DECEMBER 2022
PERTAINING TO THE QUESTION OF PALESTINE
WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE STATE OF PALESTINE

ANNEXES
Annex 1 C. Greenwood, ‘Judicial Integrity and the Advisory Jurisdiction of
the International Court of Justice’
Annex 2 Bill Clinton, My Life (2005) 944-945
Annex 3 Condoleezza Rice, No Higher Honor: A Memoir of My Years in
Washington (2011) 724
Annex 4 ‘Full Transcript: Prince Bandar bin Sultan's interview on Israel-
Palestine Conflict’, Al Arabiya, 5 October 2020
Annex 5 Security Council Resolution 242 (22 November 1967)
Annex 6 Security Council Resolution 338 (22 October 1973)
Annex 7 Declaration of Principles on Interim Self-Government

Sr.q.rnuaNToFTHE Srnrn or Isru,nr, pURSUANT TorHE CouRt's OnnnRor3 Fnnnu.q,Rv
2023 nnIauNG To THE ADVISoRY PRoCEEDINGS INITIATED sy UN GTNNN,q.L ASSNMSI,Y
Rnsolurrox771247
The State of Israel attaches great importance to the peaceful settlement of disputes and to the significant
role carved out for the Intemational Court of Justice for this purpose. It moreover respects and
welcomes the appropriate use of the Court's advisory function in a manner consistent with the Court's
Statute.

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
Peace Palace, Carnegieplein 2, 2517 KJ The Hague, Netherlands
Tel.: +31 (0)70 302 2323 Fax: +31 (0)70 364 9928
Website X YouTube LinkedIn
Press Release
Unofficial
No. 2024/16
16 February 2024
Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. Israel) Decision of the Court on South Africa’s request for additional provisional measures

OBSERVATIONS Of THE STATE OF ISRAEL ON THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA'S "URGENT
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL MEASURES UNDER ARTICLE 75(1) OF THE RULES OF COURT"
DATED 12 FEBRUARY 2024
1. Israel regrets that South Africa seeks once again to misuse the Court's provisional
measures procedure, this time by a highly peculiar and improper request that makes reference
to Article 75(1) of the Rules of Court.
2. At the outset, Israel again places on record its principled position that South Africa's