INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
DISPUTE CONCERNING
CERTAIN ACTIVITIES CARRIED OUT BNICARAGUA
IN THEBORDER A REA
(COSTA RICA . NICARAGUA )
COUNTER- MEMORIAL
OF THREPUBLIC ON ICARAGUA
V OLUME III
(ANNEXES FROM 27TO111)
06 August 2012 LIST OF ANNEXES
VOLUME III
Annex Page
No.
LAWS, DECREES, ADMINISTRATIVE RESOLUTIONS AND
REGULATIONS
27 Excerpts of the Political Constitution of the Republic of Nicaragua. 1
28 Nicaraguan Decree No. 45-94, 28 October 1994. 5
29 Nicaraguan Law No. 217, 6 June 1996. 13
30 Excerpt of “ Dictamen Juridico 351, (C-351-2006), Mauricio Castro 39
Lizano, Deputy Attorney General (Procurador Adjunto)”, 31 August
2006 (1).
Excerpt of “Northern Channels (Tortuguero)” (2).
31 Nicaraguan Decree No. 01-2007, Regulation of Protected Areas in 47
Nicaragua, 8 January 2007.
32 Nicaraguan Law No. 647, 3 April 2008. 71
33 MARENAAdministrative Resolution No. 038-2008, 22 December 77
2008.
34 Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources (MARENA) 89
Administrative Resolution No. 038-2008-A1, 30 October 2009.
35 Official Daily Gazette No. 46, Decree No. 36440-MP,Year CXXXIII. 95
La Uruca, San José, Costa Rica, 7 March 2011 (1).
By-laws and regulations, Presidency of the Republic, National
Commission on Risk Prevention andAttention to Emergencies, Decision
No. 0362-2011, Specific By-Laws regarding purchasing and contracts
procedures under exception mechanisms regime by virtue of the
Declaration of a State of Emergency by virtue of Decree No. 36440,
21 September 2011 (2).
iii MILITARY DOCUMENTS
36 Order n° 005 from the Chief of the South Military Detachment for 107
compliance of order from the Chief of staff regarding the implementation
of special measures based on provisional measures of protection ordered
by the International Court of Justice and maintenance of the anti-drug
trafficking plan, rural, security plan and presidential Decree 79/2009 at
the San Juan de Nicaragua directorate, 9 March 2011.
CORRESPONDENCE
37 Letter from Ricardo Echandi Z., Minister of Transport to the Manager o111
the Institute of Lands and Colonies,11 February 1965.
38 Work Report of Official Pedro José Minas Núñez, National Police to 115
theAssistant Commissioner, Chief of the National Police, Rio San Juan,
2 August 2000.
39 Letter from Mr. Norman Caldera Cardenal, Former Minister of Foreign 119
Affairs of Nicaragua to Mr.Alejandro Fiallos, Executive President of the
National Ports Company, Reference MRE/DM/037/01/06, 10 January
2006.
40 Letter from Mr. Alejandro Fiallos Navarro, Executive President of 123
National Ports Company to Mr C.Arturo Harding Lacayo, Ministry for
the Environment and Natural Resources, 18 January 2006.
41 Letter from Hilda Espinoza, General Director for Environmental Quality127
Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources to Mr. Alejandro
Fiallos Navarro Executive President of National Ports Company,
3 February 2006.
iv42 Memorandum from Mr. Engineer Cristóbal (Tito) Sequeira Minister, 131
Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources to Mr. Bayardo
Quintero, Director General for ProtectedAreas, Reference CSG-091-02-
06, 28 February 2006 (1).
Memorandum from Mr. Engineer Cristóbal (Tito) Sequeira Minister,
Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources to Dr. Iván Ortega
Director, Secretariat of the Southeast Nicaragua Biosphere Reserve,
Reference CSG-091-02-06, 28 February 2006 (2).
Memorandum from Mr. Engineer Cristóbal (Tito) Sequeira Minister,
Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources to Dr. Juan José
Romero Coordinator, PROCUENCA Río San Juan, Reference CSG-
091-02-06, 28 February 2006 (3).
Memorandum from Mr. Engineer Cristóbal (Tito) Sequeira Minister,
Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources to Engineer
Arcadio Choza Head of the General Directorate for Natural Resources
and Biodiversity, Reference CSG-091-02-06,28 February 2006 (4).
43 Letter from Mr. Engineer Cristóbal (Tito) Sequeira Minister, Ministry 141
for the Environment and Natural Resources to Mr. Claudio Gutierrez,
Executive Director, INETER, Reference DM-CSG-101-02-06,
28 February 2006 (1).
Letter from Mr. Engineer Cristóbal (Tito) SequeiraMinister, Ministry for
the Environment and Natural Resources to Mr. Ricardo Vega Jackson,
Minister MTI, Reference DM-CSG-101-02-06, 28 February 2006(2).
44 Memorandum from Arcadio Choza, Director General of MARENA’s 147
Department of Natural Resources and Biodiversity to Silvia Martinez E.,
MARENADirector for Water Resources, 3 March 2006.
45 Letter from Hilda Espinoza, General Director for Environmental Quality, 151
Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources to Mr. Alejandro
Fiallos Navarro Executive President of National Ports Company,
Reference DGCA-HEU-C 189-03-2006, 20 March 2006.
46 Letter from Engineer Noel S. Salinas Alvarado, Technical Manager, 155
National Ports Company to Members of the Institutional Commission,
Río San Juan Dredging Project, Engineer Milton Medina MARENA
Delegate, Engineer Sergio Cordonero INETER delegate, Reference
GT-0237-03-2006, 25 March 2006.
v 47 Letter from Hilda Espinoza, General Director for Environmental Quality, 159
Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources to Mr. Alejandro
Fiallos Navarro Executive President of National Port Authority,
Reference DGCA-HEU-C-413-07-2006, 3 July 2006 (1).
Memorandum from Hilda Espinoza, General Director for Environmental
Quality, Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources to
Dr. Ivan Ortega G. Director of the Secretariat of the Biosphere Reserve
of Southeast Nicaragua, Reference DGCA–HE–324–07-06, 4 July 2006
(2).
48 Memorandum from Edda Martínez, Director of Environmental Evaluation 163
and Protection, Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources
(MARENA) to Adelina Ramírez, Documentation Center MARENA,
Reference DGCA– EM – M291, 2August 2006 (1).
Memorandum from Edda Martínez, Director of Environmental
Evaluation and Protection, Ministry for the Environment and Natural
Resources (MARENA) to José Luis Galeano, MARENA Delegate Río
San Juan, Reference DGCA– EM – M292, 2August 2006 (2).
Letter from Edda Martínez, Director of Environmental Evaluation
and Protection, Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources
(MARENA) to Mr. Francisco Díaz Rivas, Municipality El Castillo,
Reference DGCA– EM – C208, 2August 2006 (3).
Letter from Edda Martínez, Director of Environmental Evaluation
and Protection, Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources
(MARENA) to Mr. César Collado Parada, Municipality San Juan del
Norte Reference DGCA– EM – C209, 2August 2006 (4).
Letter from Edda Martínez, Director of Environmental Evaluation
and Protection, Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources
(MARENA) to Alejandro Fiallos, engineer, Reference DGCA – EM –
C210, 2August 2006 (5).
49 Letter from Ing. Leonardo Zacarias Coreo T. General Manager Corea y 171
Asociados S.A. (CORASCO) to Liliam Osejo Sacasa, Deputy Minister
Environment and Natural Resources (MARENA), 21 September 2006.
50 Letter from Ing. Noel S. SalinasAlvarado Technical Manager , National 175
PortAuthority to Hilda Espinoza General Directorate of Environmental
Quality Control, Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources
(MARENA) Reference GT-0791-09-2006, 22 September 2006.
vi51 Letter from Ing. Noel S. SalinasAlvarado Technical Manager, National Port 179
Authority to Cristóbal Sequeira Minister, Ministry for the Environment
and Natural Resources (MARENA) Reference GT-0794-09-2006,
25 September 2006.
52 Letter from Ing. Leonardo Zacarías Corea T. General Manager Corea y 183
Asociados S.A. (CORASCO) to Ing. Noel S. SalinasAlvarado Technical
Manager, National PortAuthority, 2 October 2006.
53 Letter fromAlejandro Fiallos Navarro Executive President, National Port189
Authority to Mr. Tito Sequeira Minister, Ministry for the Environment
and Natural Resources (MARENA), Reference PE-AFN-0855-0-06,
3 October 2006.
54 Letter from IngAlejandro Fiallos Navarro Executive President, National 195
PortAuthority to Cristóbal Sequeira Minister, Ministry of Environment
and Natural Resources (MARENA), 5 October 2006.
55 Letter from Edda Martínez Director for Environmental Oversight and 207
Protection DGCA, MARENAto Mr. Jurgen Sengelman Director DGTA/
MTI, Reference DGCA-EM-C258, 10 October 2006 (1).
Letter from Edda Martínez Director for Environmental Oversight and
Protection DGCA, MARENA to Mr. Luis Palacios Director for Water
Resources INETER, Reference DGCA-EM-C259, 10 October 2006 (2).
Memorandum from Edda Martínez Director for Environmental Oversight
and Protection DGCA, MARENA to José Luis Galeno Director SERB
– SENMARENA, Reference DGCA-EM-M 396, 10 October 2006 (3).
Memorandum from Edda Martínez Director for Environmental Oversight
and Protection DGCA, MARENAto Iván Ortega Director for Protected
Areas, MARENA, Reference DGCA-EM-M 397, 10 October 2006 (4).
56 Memorandum from Iván Ortega Gasteazoro, MARENA General 215
Director for ProtectedAreas to Hilda Espinoza Urbina, Director General
of MARENA’s Department of Environmental Quality, 25 October 2006.
57 Letter from Noel S. Salinas Alvarado of EPN to Zacarías Corea of 221
CORASCO, Reference GT-0954-11-2006, 23 November 2006.
58 Work Report of Enrique Jardiel Arteaga Núñez, Second Chief of the 225
National Police, Río San Juan Delegation to Commissioner José Miguel
Pérez Solis, Head of Police Division, Río San Juan, 20 June 2008.
vii 59 Letter from EPN Executive President, Virgilio Silva Munguía to Hilda 229
Espinoza Urbina, Director General of MARENA’s Department of
Environmental Quality, Reference PE-VSM-0754-07-2008, 15 July
2008.
60 Memorandum from Julio C. Ordoñez L. to Executive President, Virgilio 233
Silva Munguía ( accompanying report), 13August 2008.
61 EPN Memorandum from Arosman Mendieta Jerez, Supervising 241
Engineer to Lester Quintero Gomez, Technical Div. Manager, National
Ports Company (accompanying minutes), Reference IS-AMJ-12-09-08,
23 September 2008.
62 Letter from Engineer Leonardo Zacarias Corea T. General Manager 247
Corea &Associates (CORASCO) to RobertoAraquistaín Vice Minister
MARENA, 21 October 2008.
63 Letter from Carlos Robelo Raffone, NicaraguanAmbassador in Geneva 251
and Permanent Representative of Nicaragua before the United Nations
and other International Organizations toAnada Tiéga, Ramsar Secretary
General, RAMSAR, 30 November 2010.
64 Letter from Carlos Robelo Raffone, NicaraguanAmbassador in Geneva 255
and Permanent Representative of Nicaragua before the United Nations
and other International Organizations toAnada Tiéga, Ramsar Secretary
General, 2 December 2010.
65 Letter from Eng. Lester A. Quintero G. Technical Manager, National 259
Port Authority to Ms. Hilda Espinoza Director General Environmental
Quality MARENA, Reference GT-LACQG-0402-04-2011, 5April 2011.
66 Letter from H.E. Mr. Jorge Urbina-Ortega, co-Agent of Costa Rica to t263
Registrar of the ICJ, Reference ECRPB-025-12, 3 July 2012.
DIPLOMATIC CORRESPONDENCEAND RECORDS
67 Diplomatic Note from the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Nicaragua 275
to the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Costa Rica, Reference MRE/
DGAJ/127/03111, 24 March 2011.
viii68 Diplomatic Note from the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Costa Rica 279
to the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Nicaragua, Reference DM-
DVM-217-2011,30 March 2011.
69 Diplomatic Note from the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Nicaragua to 283
the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Costa Rica, Reference MRE/DM/
AJST/349/04/11, 1 April 2011.
70 Diplomatic Note from the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Costa Rica to 289
the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Nicaragua, Reference DM-225-11,
4 April 2011.
71 Note from the Minister of ForeignAffairs of Nicaragua to the Minister o293
Foreign Affairs of Costa Rica, Reference MRE/DVM/AJST/500/11/11,
29 November 2011.
72 Diplomatic note from the Minister of Foreign Affairs and Worship of 297
Costa Rica to the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Nicaragua, Reference
DM-AM-601-11, 29 November 2011.
73 Note from the Minister of ForeignAffairs of Nicaragua to the Minister o301
Foreign Affairs of Costa Rica, Reference MRE/DVS/VJW/0685/12/11,
10 December 2011.
74 Diplomatic note from the Minister of Foreign Affairs and Worship of 305
Costa Rica to the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Nicaragua, Reference
DVM-AM-286-11, 20 December 2011.
75 Diplomatic Note from the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Costa Rica to t309
Minister of Foreign Affairs of Nicaragua, Reference DM-AM-046-12,
27 January 2012.
76 Diplomatic Note from the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Nicaragua to 313
the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Costa Rica, Reference MRE/DM-
AJ/116/02/12, 13 February 2012.
ix 77 Diplomatic Note from the Minister of Foreign Affairs and Worship of 317
Costa Rica to the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Nicaragua, Reference
DM-AM-045-12, 26 January 2012 (1).
Diplomatic Note from the Minister of ForeignAffairs of Nicaragua to the
Minister of ForeignAffairs and Worship of Costa Rica, Reference MRE/
DM-AJ/118/02/12, 13 February 2012 (2).
Diplomatic Note from the Minister of Foreign Affairs and Worship of
Costa Rica to the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Nicaragua, Reference
DM-AM-144-12, 14 March 2012 (3).
MINUTES OF MEETINGS
78 Joint Declaration of the Presidents of the Republics of Costa Rica, 325
RafaelAngel Calderon Fournier and Nicaragua, Mrs. Violeta Barrios de
Chamorro, Managua, Republic of Nicaragua, 31 January 1991 (1).
Final Record of the IV Binational Nicaragua-Costa Rica meeting,
12 – 13 May 1997 (2).
Final Record of the V Binational Nicaragua-Costa Rica meeting,
19 – 20 October 2006 (3).
VII Meeting of the Nicaragua-Costa Rica, Bi-national Commission,
3 October 2008 (4).
79 Minutes of the Public Consultation in San Juan de Nicaragua, 9August 329
2006 (1).
Certification of the Municipal Council of San Juan de Nicaragua,
10August 2006 (2).
AFFIDAVITS
80 Affidavit of Jose Magdiel Perez Solis (POLICE), 15 December 2010. 333
81 Affidavit of Gregorio de Jesús Aburto Ortiz (POLICE), 15 December 339
2010.
82 Affidavit of Luis Fernando Barrantes Jiménez (POLICE), 15 December 345
2010.
83 Affidavit of Douglas Rafael Pichardo Ramírez (POLICE), 15 December 351
2010.
x84 Affidavit of SubanAntonioYuri Valle Olivares (POLICE), 15 December 357
2010.
85 Affidavit of Juan Francisco Gutiérrez Espinoza (MILITARY), 363
15 December 2010.
86 Affidavit of Manuel Salvador Mora Ortiz (MILITARY), 15 December 367
2010.
87 Affidavit of Norman Javier Juárez Blanco (MILITARY), 15 December 371
2010.
88 Affidavit of Denis Membreño Rivas (MILITARY), 15 December 2010. 377
89 Affidavit of Farle Isidro Roa Traña, 16 December 2010. 383
90 Declaration of Elsa Maria Vivas Soto, Agrocultural Engineer, General 395
Department of Environmental Quality of the Ministry of the Environment
and Natural Resources, 20 December 2010.
PRESS REPORTS
91 El Nuevo Diario, Press Notice of theAvailability of the Environmental 407
Impact Document for the Project “Dredging of the San Juan River”,
7 August 2006.
92 El Nuevo Diario, Nicaragua Ticotimes.net, “Costa Rican Police Forces 411
Sent to Nicaraguan Border”,
22 October, 2010 (1).
El Nuevo Diario, Nicaragua Encourages Costa Ricans to join the military ▯
reserves on the anniversary of the abolition of the Costa Rican army, 1
December 2010 (2).
93 El 19 Digital, “Nicaragua will go to The Hague for delimitation of the417
border with Costa Rica”, 2 November 2010.
94 A.M. Costa Rica Third NewsPage, “Costa Rica mobilizes troops along 423
Nicaraguan line”, available at http://www.amcostarica.com/102210.htm
(last visited 21 July 2012), 22 October 2010.
95 TicoTimes.net,Adam Williams, “Tough talk as Costa Rica - Nicaragua 427
border tightens”, 14 January 2011.
xi 96 La Prensa, Nicaragua, “Costa Rican Foreign Minister starts tour agains433
Nicaragua” 17 January 2011.
97 EFE, “Deputies call the Foreign Minister of Costa Rica a ‘bully’and 437
‘outdated’”, 20 September 2011.
98 University Seminar, “Environmental damage feared due to construction 441
of highway parallel to Rio San Juan”, 1 November 2011.
99 El País, Costa Rica, “Chinchilla Defends Highway Criticized by 447
Nicaragua, Rejects Dialogue”,(Source: EFE / 13 December 2011),
14 December 2011.
100 El Nuevo Diario, Nicaragua, “Outrage everywhere over San Juan 451
River parallel highway, No Studies Done for Costa Rican Highway”,
15 December 2011.
101 El Nuevo Diario, Nicaragua, “Costa Rica affirms Central American 457
Court is politicized in favor of Nicaragua” (Source: EFE│7/1/2012),
7 January 2012.
102 El Nuevo Diario, Nicaragua, “Costa Rican Vice-President suggests 461
eating the San Juan”, 23 January 2012.
103 La Nación, Costa Rica “Conavi Built a Dirt Road along the Border with-465
out a Single Design Plan”, 23 May 2012.
104 La Nación, Costa Rica “Government avoided applying environmental 469
control in border trail”, 24 May 2012.
105 Press release from CONAVI to the public, 25 May 2012. 473
106 El Pais, Costa Rica, “Faced with Criticism, Conavi Confirms to Have 477
Done Work on 332 Kilometers of Roads around Route 1856”, 26 May
2012.
107 La Nación, Costa Rica “Serious errors expose trail to risk of collapse481
during the rainy season”, 28 May 2012.
108 Crhoy.com, “EngineersAssociation: ‘Emergency Decree does not justify 485
absence of engineering principles”, 30 May 2012.
xii109 Diario Extra, “Government acknowledges mistakes in the construction 489
of the trail”, available athttp://www.diarioextra.com/2012/mayo/30/
nacionales13.php, 30 May 2012.
110 La Nación, Costa Rica, “Chinchilla: There may be errors, but road project 493
should continue”, 31 May 2012.
111 Crhoy.com, “Path construction supervisors informed problems and the 497
lack of oversight”, available at http://www.crhoy.com/supervisores-de-
trocha-senalaron-problemas-e-inexistencia-de-controles/,11 June 2012.
xiii Annex 27
Excerpts of the Political Constitution of the Republic of Nicaragua
12 Annex 27
POLITICAL CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF NICARAGUA
* * *
TITLE IV
RIGHTS, DUTIES, AND GUARANTEES OF THE NICARAGUAN PEOPLE
* * *
CHAPTER I
INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS
* * *
Art. 38 The Law does not have retroactive effect, except in criminal matters when
favorable to the defendant.
* * *
CHAPTER II
POLITICAL RIGHTS
* * *
Art. 60 Nicaraguans have a right to live in a healthy environment. It is the obligation of
the State to preserve, conserve, andrestore the environment and natural resources.
* * *
TITLE VI
NATIONAL ECONOMY, AGRARIAN REFORM, AND PUBLIC FINANCE
CHAPTER I
NATIONAL ECONOMY
* * *
Art. 102 Natural resources are national assets. The preservation of the environment and
the conservation, development, and rational use of natural resources is the duty of the
state; it may enter into contracts for the rational use of these resources, when the national
interest so requires.
* * *
Art. 105 It is the obligation of the State to promote, facilitate, and regulate the provision
of the basic public services regarding energy, communication, water, transportation, road
3Annex 27
infrastructure, ports and airports to t he people, and it is their inalienable right to have
access thereto. Private investments and the modalities thereof and concessions to private
parties to operate in these areas shall be governed by the law in each case.
Education, health, and social security services are irrevocable duties of the State, which is
bound to provide them without exclusions, to improve them and to expand them. The
facilities and infrastructure for those services belonging to the State may not be alienated
in any way.
Free healthcare is guaranteed for the vulnerable sectors of the population, with priority
given to the provision of mother -child programs. The state health and education services
must be expanded and strengthened. The right to establish private services in the areas of
health and education is guaranteed.
It is the duty of the State to guarantee quality control over goods and services, and to
prevent speculation and the hoarding of basic consumer goods.
4 Annex 28
Nicaraguan Decree No. 45-94
Environmental Impact Permit and Evaluation Regulation
28 October 1994
56 Annex 28
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT PERMIT AND EVALUATION REGULATION
DECREE No. 45-94
The President of the Republic of Nicaragua
WHEREAS
I
It is the responsibility of the State to ensure that Nicaraguans live in a healthy environment.
II
Development may lead to consequences that affect the environment, which makes necessary the
application of environmental evaluation, regulation, and control systems, in accordance with the
various laws existing in matters of environmental protection and the rational exploitation of
natural resources.
III
The environmental impact evaluation, so as not to constitute an obstacle to sustainable
development, must be performed under homogenous technical criteria using a suitable
mechanism and procedures, to which end effective regulations are required.
THEREFORE
In use of the authorities granted by the Political Constitution
The following Decree on:
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT PERMIT AND EVALUATION REGULATION
HAS BEEN ISSUED
Art. 1. This Regulation establishes the procedures that the Mi nistry of the Environment and
Natural Resources (MARENA) will use for the granting of an environmental permit, as a
mandatory administrative document for products that require an environmental impact study.
Art. 2. Art. 5 specifically lists projects for which an environmental impact study shall be
performed.
Art. 3. For the purposes of this law, the following definitions shall be used:
a) ENVIRONMENT: The system of biotic, abiotic, socioeconomic and elements
7Annex 28
that interact with each other, with individu als, and with the community where
they live, determining their relationships and survival.
b) ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT: A document issued by MARENA, [upon] request
of the proponent of a project, which certifies that from the environmental
protection point of view the activity can be executed under the condition of
fulfilling the established measures.
c) ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY: A set of technical and scientific
activities aimed at identifying, predicting, and controlling the environmental
impacts of a project and its alternatives presented in the form of a technical report
and undertaken as per the criteria established in current regulations.
d) ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT DOCUMENT: A document prepared by a
multidisciplinary team, under the responsibility of the proponent, which reports,
to the competent authority and other interested parties the results and conclusions
of the Environmental Impact Study, translating the technical information and data
into clear and easy to understand language.
e) ECOLOGICALLY FRAGILE AREAS. An area vulnerable or susceptible to
being damaged by the effect of certain environmental impacts, low stability and
resistance and weak capacity for regeneration: springs, aquifers, rivers, lakes,
crater lagoons or estuaries, deltas, beaches, rocky coasts, keys, coral reefs, marine
plains, wetlands, dunes, lands with inclines of more than 35%, forests and their
respective transition areas, and areas declared under protection.
f) PROPONENT. A public or private, national or foreign, natural or l egal person
who proposes the execution of a project, for which he requests an environmental
permit.
g) ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: Any positive or negative material alteration of
one or more of the biotic, abiotic, socioeconomic, cultural, and aesthetic
components of the environment.
h) AREA OF INFLUENCE. The space and the surface where the direct or indirect
actions of a project or activity have an effect.
i) MITIGATION MEASURE. (An action) aimed at preventing and avoiding the
negative impacts caused by the execution of a project, or to reduce the magnitude
of those that cannot be avoided.
j) MONITORING. Periodic measuring of one or more parameters indicating the
environmental impact caused by the execution of a project.
k) ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. Set of plans and their
respective actions for a project to be performed in accordance with the
8 Annex 28
environmental protection principles established in the environmental permit.
l) RESOLUTION. This is the administrative act by which an environmental permit
is granted or denied.
m) OPINION. An administrative act prepared under the technical responsibility of
the General Environmental Office (DGA) of the Ministry of the Environment and
Natural Resources, which presents the results of the review of an environmenta l
impact study and document, to be used to justify the decision by MARENA on
the granting of an environmental permit for a project.
Art. 4. Having obtained an environmental permit is indispensable for the performance of the
new, expansion, rehabilitation, or reconversion projects cited in Art. 5. The granting of such
permit is without Prejudice to such other obligations as are required by domestic law.
Art. 5. The submission of an environmental impact study and document shall be a requirement
for the gr anting of an environmental permit for the projects deriving from the following
activities:
a) exploration and exploitation of gold, zinc, copper, iron, silver, hydrocarbons, and
geothermal resources;
b) exploration and exploitation of other minerals when the deposits are located in
ecologically fragile areas or areas protected by law;
c) semi-intensive and intensive shrimp farms and semi -intensive and intensive
aquiculture of other species;
d) changes in the use of forestry land, forestry management plans in areas greater
than 5,000 hectares, forestry exploitation on gradients greater than or equal to
35% or that require the full-time opening of forest roads;
e) electricity generation plants from any source above 5 MW in power; and
electricity transmission lines with voltage greater than 69 KW;
f) ports, airports, crop-dusting aerodromes, terminals for mining, and hydrocarbons
along with their derivatives;
g) new trunk railways and highways;
h) oil pipelines, gas pipelines, and ore slurry pipelines;
i) macro-drainage systems and woks, purification stations, sewer systems, and
discharges of sewage water, dams, micro-dams, and reservoirs;
j) dredging works and works to change the courses of bodies of surface water;
9Annex 28
k) incinerators for industrial use a nd chemical substances, other forms of handling
toxic substances, controlled sanitary landfills and safety fills;
l) fills for land recovery, tourism complexes, and other development and sports
projects when they are located in ecologically fragile areas or areas protected by
law;
m) industrial fishing complexes and plants, industrial slaughterhouse; food and
beverage industries; sugary refineries and alcohol distilleries; textile and cloth
finishing industries; industrial curing of leather; the manufactu re of pulp, paper,
and cardboard; production of resins and synthetic products; manufacturers and
formulators of agrichemicals; fabrication of paints, varnishes, lacquers, and
solvents; oil refineries; iron and steel industries; nonferrous metal industry;
chromium industries; chemical, petrochemical, chlorine chemical industries;
cement industry; industrial production of batteries or accumulators.
Art. 6. MARENA may request from the office of the president of the Republic expansion of
the specific list of projects that require an Environmental Impact Study.
Art. 7. MARENA, upon consultation with the other state entities, whether national, regional,
or municipal, will issue the technical and administrative rules that are necessary to implement
this Decree.
Art. 8. It is the obligation of the proponent to submit the documentation and information that is
requested of it, in accordance with this decree and such supplementary provisions as MARENA
issues.
Art. 9. Once the Environmental Permit application is s ubmitted, MARENA may undertake the
necessary inspections and visits to the properties, facilities, or places related to the Project.
Art. 10. MARENA, in coordination with the corresponding sectoral body, based on the general
Terms of Reference for Enviro nmental Impact Studies, shall define the specific Terms of
Reference for each project with the proponent.
Art. 11. The environmental impact study shall be submitted by the proponent, who shall be
responsible for it and shall be obligated to submit any re sponse or clarification that MARENA
requires.
Art. 12. The costs of the studies, mitigation measures, monitoring, environmental management
programs, and other procedures related to the permit process, shall be borne by the proponent.
Art. 13. MARENA sh all consult with the competent sectoral bodies with respect to the
environmental impact document, in accordance with the established procedure.
Art. 14. The Environmental Impact Document may be discussed, in accordance with the
10 Annex 28
established procedures, wi th the MARENA Territorial Offices, and governments of the
Municipalities where the project is located.
Art. 15. MARENA shall publish just once, in two national -circulation newspapers, the
availability of the Environmental Impact Document for public consultation, as well as the times,
places for consultation, and the time frames established to receive opinions, in accordance with
the established procedure.
Art. 16. MARENA shall have a maximum period of 10 business days for the preliminary review
of the documents received and, if necessary, it shall request additional information in accordance
with the terms of reference established. Once they are satisfactorily received, the period starts.
Art. 17. MARENA shall have a minimum period of 30 business days and no more than one -
third of the time used to prepare the environmental impact study, without this exceeding
120 business days, to proceed with its technical review and issue the corresponding resolution.
Such period may be interrupted upon notification until the information requested is provided.
Art. 18. The Resolution issued by the General Environmental Office, when it is positive, shall
establish the mitigation measures the negative impacts generated by the project, the monitoring
requirements, and the environmental management program that the proponent commits to.
Art. 19. Against the resolution by the General Environmental Office there is a Motion for
Reconsideration by that selfsame body, which shall be filed within a period of 5 business days
after notification; against the foregoing resolution there exists only a motion for review by the
Minister, which shall be filed within a period of 10 business days after notification. The
foregoing motion exhausts administrative remedies.
Art. 20. Noncompliance with the measures established in a MARENA resolution shall be
punished as established in the procedures and in accordance with current legal provisions.
Art. 21. The permit may be cancelled because of nonperformance of the actions established for
conserving and protecting the environment. The cancellation of the environmental permit implies
the suspension or definitive closure of the project’s operations.
Art. 22. The application of the provisions on the granting of the Environmental Impact Perm it
cited in this Decree shall be subject to the issuance by MARENA of the supplementary
administrative procedures and general terms of reference.
1112 Annex 29
Nicaraguan Law No. 217
General Environmental and Natural Resources Act
06 June 1996
1314 Annex 29
LA GACETA
OFFICIAL GAZETTE
TelePO Box 868 3791
Print Run: 1,100 Copies Price CS 10.00
Córdobas Oro
YEAR C Managua, Thursday 6 June 1996 No. 105
[…]
NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF THE
REPUBLIC OF NICARAGUA
GENERAL ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES ACT
Law No. 217
[…]
Title 1
Chapter I
General Provisions
Art. 1. The objective of this General Environment and Natural Resources Act is to establish the
standards for the conservation, protection, improvement, and restoration of the environment and
the natural resources that constitute it, ensuring the rational and sustainable use thereof, pursuant
to the provisions of the Political Constitution.
Art. 2. The provisions contained in this Act are of a public policy nature. All persons may have
citizen participation to bring administrative, civil, or criminal actions against those who violate
this Act.
Art. 3. The following are specific objectives of this Act:
1) The prevention, regulation, and control of any of the causes or activities that give r ise to
the deterioration of the environment and contamination of ecosystems.
2) To establish the means, forms, and opportunities for the rational exploitation of natural
resources within a National Plan based on sustainable development, with equality and social
justice, and taking into account the cultural diversity of the country and respecting the rights
15Annex 29
granted to our autonomous regions of the Atlantic Coast and Municipal Governments.
3) The correct use of physical space through territorial regulations that take into account the
protection of the environment and natural resources as a basis for the performance of human
activities.
4) To strengthen the National System of Protected Areas, in order to guarantee biodiversity
and other resources.
5) To guarantee the use and rational management of water basins and systems, thus ensuring
their sustainability.
6) To develop and promote environmental education as a means to promote a society in
harmony with nature.
7) To foster a healthy environment that cont ributes in the best manner to the promotion of
health and the prevention of diseases amongst the Nicaraguan people.
8) To promote and incentivize activities and programs that lead to the implementation of
and compliance with this Act.
9) Such others as are contained in this Act.
Art. 4. The economic and social development of the country shall be subject to the following
guiding principles:
1) The environment is the common property of the nation and it constitutes a basis for the
sustainable development of the country.
2) It is the duty of the State and of all inhabitants to protect the natural resources and the
environment, to improve them, to restore them, and to attempt to eliminate unsustainable patterns
of production and consumption.
3) The policy of prevention shall prevail over any other in the public and private
management of the environment. The lack of absolute scientific certainty may not be used as a
reason not to adopt preventive measures in all the activities that affect the environment.
4) The State must recognize and provide support to the indigenous peoples and
communities, whether they are part of the Autonomous Regions, the Pacific Region, or the
Center of the Country, in their activities for the preservation of the environment and sustainable
use of natural resources.
5) Property rights have a socio- environmental function that limits and conditions the
absolute, abusive, and arbitrary exercise thereof, pursuant to the provisions of this Act and of the
special environmental Law in force or those that are approved in the future.
16 Annex 29
6) The freedom of inhabitants, within the framework of economic and social activities, is
limited and conditioned on the social interest, pursuant to the provisions of the Political
Constitution, this Act, and current special environmental laws or such as are issued in the future.
7) The conditions and agreements regarding the rational exploitation of natural resources
granted by the State in the autonomous regions of the Atlantic Coast shall have the approval of
the corresponding Autonomous Council. In rational Exploitation agreements for natural
resources located in the respective municipalities, the State shall request and take into account
the opinions of the municipal governments, before authorizing them.
Chapter II
Definitions
Art. 5. For the purposes of this law, the following definitions shall be used:
ENVIRONMENT: The system of biotic, abiotic, cultural, socioeconomic and aesthetic elements
that interact with each other, with individuals, and with the community where they live,
determining their relationships and survival.
EXPLOITATION: The use or rational sustainable exploitation of natural and environmental
resources.
BIODIVERSITY: Thecollection of each and every one of the species of living beings and the
varieties thereof, whether terrestrial, aquatic, or if they live in the air or in the ground, whether
they are plants or animals or of any type it includes the diversity of a single species, amongst
species, and between ecosystems, as well as genetic diversity.
CONSERVATION: The a pplication of all necessary measures needed to preserve, improve,
maintain, rehabilitate and restore populations, and ecosystems, without affecting the exploitation
thereof.
CONTAMINATION: The presence and/or introduction into the environment of elements
harmful to life, flora, or fauna, or such as degrade the quality of the atmosphere, the water, the
ground, or natural assets and resources in general.
CONTAMINANT: All materials, elements, compounds, substances, chemical or biological
derivatives, energy, radiation, vibrations, noise, or a combination thereof in any of their physical
states which when incorporated into being or acting on the atmosphere, water, soil, flora, fauna,
or any other element of the environment, alters or modifies its natural composition and degrades
its quality, jeopardizing the health of persons and the preser vation and conservation of the
environment.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL: The supervision, inspection, monitoring, and application of
conservation within the environment.
measures for the
17Annex 29
ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE: All losses, reductions, deterioration, or harm caused to the
environment or to one or more of the components thereof.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT DOCUMENT: A document prepared by a mu ltidisciplinary
team, under the responsibility of the proponent, which reports to the competent authority and
other interested parties the results and conclusions of the Environmental Impact Study,
translating the technical information and data into clearand easy to understand language.
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: To improve the quality of human life without exceeding
the capacity of the ecosystems that sustainit.
CAPACITY: These are the limits that ecosystems and the biosphere can bear without suffering
serious deterioration.
ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION: A permanent process of citizen training, formal and
informal, for becoming aware of and developing values, concepts, and attitudes regarding the
protection and sustainable use of natural resources and the environment.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY
A set of technical and scientific activities aimed at identifying, predicting, and controlling the
environmental impacts of a project and its alternatives presented in the form of a technical report
and undertaken as per the criteria established in current regulations.
ECOSYSTEMS: The basic Unit of interaction of living organisms with each other and their
relationship to the environment.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT EVALUATION:
Environmental Impact Evaluation (EIA) is defined as the environmental policy and management
instrument comprised of the set of procedures, studies, and technical systems that allow for an
estimate of the effects that the execution of a specific work, activity, or project can have on the
environment.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: Any positive or negative material alteration of one or more of
the components of the environment caused by human action and/or natural events in a defined
area of influence.
REGULATION: A Planning Process aimed at evaluating and scheduling the use of the land in
the National Territory, depending on its potential characteristics and suitability taking into
account natural and environmental resources, economic and social activities, and the distribution
of the population, within the framework of an ecological system conservation and sustainable use
policy.
ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT: A document granted by the competent authority upon request of
the proponent of a project that certifies that from the environmental protection point of view the
activity can be executed under the condition of performing the established measures.
18 Annex 29
NATURAL RESOURCES: Natural elements that man has to meet his economic, social, and
cultural needs. (Natural elements subject to being exploited by man.)
EMISSION LEVELS: The release of greenhouse gases or the precursors thereof into the
atmosphere in one area during a specified time period.
PROTECTED AREAS: Those areas whose purpose is the conservation, rational management,
and restoration of the flora, wild fauna, and other similar life forms, as well as biodiversity and
the biosphere.
Likewise included in this category are those species in the national territory that are protected in
order to restore and conserve geomorphologic phenomena, sites of historic, ar cheological,
cultural, scenic, or recreational importance.
HAZARDOUS WASTE: Hazardous waste is defined as that which, in any physical state, has
significant quantities of substances that may be hazardous to the life or health of living
organisms when they are released into the environment or if they are handled improperly due to
their size based on their corrosive, toxic, poisonous, reactive, explosive, inflammable,
biologically pernicious, infectious, irritating or any other characteristics that represen ts a hazard
to human life, the quality of life, environmental resources or ecological equilibrium.
Title II
Environmental Management
Chapter I
The Environment Commission
Art. 6. The National Commission is created as a forum for analyzing, discussing, and setting
environmental policies. It will function as the coordinating authority between the State and Civil
Society to obtain the harmonious action of all sectors, as well as a consultative and advisory
body of the Executive Branch in relation to the f ormalization of policies, strategies, design and
execution of environmental programs.
Art. 7. The Commission shall be made up permanently of the representatives of the following
Institutions and entities:
1) Ministry of the environment and Natural Resources, which will preside over it.
2) Ministry of the Economy and Development.
3) Ministry of Finance.
4) Ministry of Construction and Transportation.
19Annex 29
5) Ministry of Health.
6) Ministry of Foreign Relations.
7) Nicaraguan Institute of Territorial Studies.
8) Nicaraguan Aqueduct and Sewer Institute.
9) One delegate from each one of the Autonomous Regional Councils of the South
Atlantic.
10) One delegate from the Association of Municipalities of Nicaragua.
11) Two delegates from environmental nongove rnmental organizations, one of them
on behalf of the Nicaraguan Environmental Movement.
12) Two delegates from Private Enterprise: One from the Industrial Sector and the
other from the Agricultural and Livestock Sector.
13) One delegate from the Union Sector.
14) One delegate from the National Board of Universities.
15) One delegate from the National Assembly’s Environmental and Natural
Resources Committee.
When the subject matter so warrants, R epresentatives of other Institutions and Entities of the
State or Civil Society shall be invited to participate.
The commission shall operate in accordance with such Internal Regulation as it itself issues.
Art. 8. The Ministry of the Environment and National Resources, as the regulatory and
normative entity of the environmental policy of the country, shall be the one responsible for
compliance with this Act and it shall monitor the implementation of the provisions established
herein.
Art. 9. The Environmental and Natural Resource Defense Office is created, as a specialized
branch of the Department of Justice. It shall represent and defend the interests of the State and
society in this matter.
Art. 10. The Environmental Office shall have the following attributes:
1) Take actions and represent the public i nterest, with the capacity as a party to the
proceeding, in all actions for violations of environmental laws.
20 Annex 29
2) Take the other actions stipulated in this Act, in the Organic Act of the Justice
Department, and in the other pertinent Acts.
Chapter II
The Instruments for Environmental Management
Art. 11. The set of policies, directives, technical and legal provisions, activities, Programs,
projects and institutions that allow for the application of the General Environmental Principles
and the achievement of the environmental objectives of the country are instruments for managing
the environment, among which are the following:
1) Planning and legislation
2) Environmental Regulations of the Territory
3) Protected Areas
4) Environmental Impact Permits and Evaluations
5) National Environmental Reporting System
6) Education, Dissemination, and Scientific and Technological Development
7) Incentives
8) Public Investments
9) The National Environmental Fund
10) The Declaration of Contaminated Areas and Environmental Emergencies.
Section I
Planning and Legislation
Art. 12. The planning for the national, regional, and municipal development of the country shall
include environmental elements in their economic and social plans, programs, and projects,
respecting the principles of transparency and citizen participation. Within the scope of their
competencies, all entities of the government, decentralized entities, and municipal authorities
must provide and plan for no irreversible effects, with environmental protection, and recovery of
the environment and natural resources to prevent their deterioration and extinction.
Art. 13. The agencies responsible for the formulation and application of Environmental Policy,
technical standards and other instruments sti pulated in the law, shall observe the following
principles:
21Annex 29
1) The life and productive abilitie s of the country depend on the e quilibrium of the
ecosystems.
2) The ecosystems and their elements must be used in a manner that ensures optimal
and sustained productivity, compatible with their equilibrium and integrity.
3) The protection of the environmental equilibrium is a shared responsibility of the
State and the citizens.
4) The responsibility to ensure the ecological equilibrium includes both present
conditions and those that will determine the quality of life of future generations.
5) The efficiency of environmental actions requires inter -institutional coordination
and agreement with civil society.
6) Prevention is the most effective means to avoid ecological disequilibrium.
7) The exploitation of renewable natural resources must be performed in a manner
that ensures their biodiversity and renewability.
8) The optimal exploitation of nonrenewable natural resources prevents adverse
ecological effects from occurring.
9) The quality of life of the people depends on the control and prevention of
environmental contamination, the adequate exploitation of natural elements and
the improvement of the natural environments in human settlements.
10) Such activities as are performed within the natural territory, shall respect the
ecological equilibrium of other countries or areas under international jurisdiction.
Section II
Environmental Regulations in the Territory
Art. 14. The principal objective of the environmental regulations of the country shall be to
achieve the utmost harmony possible in the interrelationships between society and its
environmental surroundings, taking into account:
1) The topographical, geomorphologic, and meteorological characterist ics of the
different environmental regions in the country.
2) The vocations of each region as a function of its natural resources, conservation,
recovery, and improvement of the quality of sources of water.
3) The distribution and cultural criteria of the people.
22 Annex 29
4) The ecological disequilibria existing due to human or natural causes.
Art. 15. The Nicaraguan Institute of Territorial Studies and the Ministry of the Environment and
Natural Resources shall issue and put into effect the rules, guidelines, and policies for regulating
the territory, taking into account:
1) The priority uses that will be given to the areas of the National territory according
to their economic potentials, specific conditions, and ecological capacities.
2) The location of the principal industrial, agro-industrial, agricultural and livestock,
forestry, mining, and services areas.
3) The general guidelines for the urban development and city system process.
4) The delimitation of protected natural areas and other spaces subject to a special
environmental conservation and improvement regime, with absolute protection
and restricted management.
5) The location of large works and infrastructure related to energy, communications,
transport, exploitation of water resources, cleanup of extreme areas, and other
analogous ones.
6) The general guidelines for road and transportation corridors.
Art. 16. The preparation and execution of territorial regulation plans will be the responsibility of
the municipal authorities who shall make them based on the established guidelines and
directives. In the case of the Autonomous regions of the Atlantic Coast, it shall fall under the
jurisdiction of the Autonomous Regional Councils with Technical Assistance from the
specialized Institutions.
Section III
Protected Areas
Art. 17. The National System of Protected Areas is created, which includes all of the areas
declared as such on the date this Act takes effect, and such as are declared in the future.
Art. 18. The basic objective of the establishm ent and legal declaration of protected natural areas
is:
1) To preserve the ecosystems representative of the different bio -geographic and
ecological regions of the country.
2) To protect water basins, water cycles, aquifers, specimens of biotic communiti es,
genetic resources, and wild genetic diversity of flora and fauna.
23Annex 29
3) To favor the development of technologies appropriate for the improvement and
rational and sustainable exploitation of natural ecosystems.
4) To protect natural landscapes and the ar eas surrounding historic, archeological,
and artistic monuments.
5) To promote recreational and tourism activities in harmony with nature.
6) To favor environmental education, scientific research, and the study of
ecosystems.
Art. 19. The inhabitants of protected areas shall be recruited and become the true guardians of
these sites, the State guaranteeing them all the rights and guarantees to which Nicaraguans have a
right.
Art. 20. The declaration of protected areas shall be established by Law; and i ts initiatives shall
therefore be regulated pursuant to the provisions of Cn. Article 140. The following shall be
taken into account prior to the declaration:
1) The identification and delimitation of the area.
2) The technical Study, which contains the biophysical, social, cultural, and
environmental characteristics and conditions.
3) The socioeconomic conditions of the people and surrounding areas.
4) The management categories recognized internationally and those that are
formulated nationally.
5) The budget line to pay, in cash and in advance, any owners who are affected.
6) The indigenous communities when the protected area is established on the lands
of those communities.
7) For the effects of this Act the following shall be the recognized categ ories of
protected areas:
7.1 Natural Reserve
7.2 National Park
7.3 Biological Reserve
7.4 National Monument
7.5 Historic Monument
7.6 Wildlife Refuge
7.7 Biosphere Reserve
7.8 Genetic Resource Reserve
24 Annex 29
7.9 Protected Land and Marine Landscape.
Art. 21. All the activities that are performed in protected areas shall necessarily be performed in
accordance with management plans supervised by MARENA, which shall be in accordance with
the categories that are established for each area. Both in the achievement of the protection
objectives and in management and supervision, attempts will be made to include the community.
Art. 22. The regulation and control of the protected areas shall be the responsibility of the
Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources, which may authorize the construction of
service and research stations, as well as give the protected areas owned by the State to third
parties under management, provided that they are nonprofit Nicaraguan legal persons, under the
conditions and rules that are established in that regard in the respective management plan.
Art. 23. All private property lands situated in protected areas are subject to the management
conditions established in the laws that govern the matter. The acquired rights of the owners who
do not agree to the new conditions that are established shall be subject to a declaration of public
utility prior to payment in cash of fair compensation.
Art. 24. Buffer zones shall be established around the protected areas with the dimensions and the
usage limitations that are stipulated in the respective Management Plan.
Environmental Impact Permit and Evaluation
Art. 25. Projects, works, industry, or any other activity which by its nature might cause
deterioration of the environment or natural resources, shall obtain, prior to their execution, an
environmental permit granted by the Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources. The
regulation shall establish the specific list of types of works and projects.
The projects that are not include d on the specific list shall be obligated to submit to the
corresponding Municipality the environmental form that the Ministry of the Environment and
Natural Resources establishes as a requirement for the respective permit.
Art. 26. Public or private, and national or foreign investment activities, works, or projects,
during their pre-investment, execution, expansion, rehabilitation, or reconversion phases, shall be
subject to the performance of environmental impact studies and evaluation, as a requirement for
the granting of an Environmental Permit.
Those which do not meet the requirements, recommendations or controls set shall be sanctioned
by the Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources. The cost of the Environmental
Impact Study shall be borne by the party interested in developing the work or project.
Art. 27. The system of Environmental Impact permits and Evaluations shall be administered by
the Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources in coordination with the corresponding
institution. With respect to the study, MARENA shall be obligated to consult with the competent
sectoral bodies as well as Municipal governments. In the case of the autonomous regions of the
Atlantic Coast, the system shall be governed by the respective regional c ouncil, in coordination
25Annex 29
with the authority that administers or authorizes the activity, work, or project, based on the
regulatory provisions, respecting citizen participation and guaranteeing the corresponding
dissemination.
Art. 28. The Environmental Pe rmits shall include all the obligations of the owner of the project
or institution responsible for it, establishing the method of follow-up and compliance with the
Permit obtained.
Art. 29. The permit binds the person to whom it is granted:
1) To maintain the controls and recommendations established for the execution or
performance of the activity.
2) To assume administrative, civil, and criminal liability for the damages caused to
the environment.
3) To observe the provisions established in the special rules and regulations in effect.
Art. 30. The Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources, based on the classification of
the investment works and the sizing thereof, shall issue the technical rules, provisions, and
methodologies that are necessary for the preparation of the Environmental Impact Studies.
[…]
Title III
Natural Resources
Chapter I
Common Rules and Methods of Acquiring Rights
Art. 54. Natural resources are the property of the nation; their ownership, use, and exploitation
shall be regulated by the provisions of this act, the special laws, and their respective regulations.
The State may grant a right to exploit natural resources, through concessions, permits, licenses,
and fees.
Art. 55. For the sustainable use and exploitation of renewable natural resources, the following
criteria, amongst others, must be taken into account:
1) The sustainability of the natural resources.
2) The convenience of preserving the environment, the socioeconomic costs and
benefits thereof.
3) The plans and priorities of the country, municipality, or autonomous region and
26 Annex 29
indigenous community where the resources are found and the benefit of
exploiting them for the communities.
Art. 56. The term for exploiting the natural resource shall be set in t he specific laws taking into
account the nature of the resource, its availability, and its individual and social profitability.
Art. 57. The State, for reasons of public interest, may limit, in whole or in part, permanently or
temporarily, the use and exploitation of natural resources. This matter shall be governed through
the specific laws.
Art. 58. Noncompliance with this Act and the special laws shall be general causes for the
termination of exploitation permits.
Art. 59. The special laws that regu late the ownership, use, and exploitation of natural resources
shall fall within the provisions of this Act.
Art. 60. The Ministry of the Economy and Development has the authority to manage the use of
the natural resources under the ownership of the Stat e that have been assigned or are assigned to
it by law, guaranteeing compliance with the technical rules and regulations established by the
Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources. In the Autonomous Regions this
management shall be undertaken in coordination with the Autonomous Regional Councils.
Art. 61. The Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources has the authority to regulate
the use of renewable and nonrenewable natural resources, and to monitor and control the quality
and appropriate use thereof. In the Autonomous Regions this regulation shall be undertaken in
coordination with the Autonomous Regional Councils.
Chapter II
Biodiversity and National Genetic Assets
Art. 62. It is the duty of the State and all of its inhabitants towatch over the conservation and
exploitation of biological diversity and national genetic assets, in accordance with the principles
and rules contained in national legislation and in International Treaties and Conventions signed
and ratified by Nicaragua.
In the case of indigenous peoples and ethnic communities who provide genetic resources, the
State shall guarantee that such usage shall be granted in accordance with conditions determined
in consultation with them.
Art. 63. The natural or legal persons that perform studies on biotechnology, shall have approval
from the competent authority in accordance with the Regulation established to that end. In the
authorized cases the effective participation of the people must be ensured, especially those
groups that provide genetic resources, and all the information available on the use, safety, and
possible effects derived from the transfer, manipulation, and utilization of any resulting organism
must be provided to them.
27Annex 29
Art. 64. In virtue of this Act, the germoplasms and each one of the native species in the national
territory, particularly the endemic ones, are registered and patented in favor of the Nicaraguan
State and People, for their sole or preferential use. A Regulation shall be established to that end,
which shall set the procedure.
Art. 65. For the use and exploitation of Biological Diversity, both Wild and domesticated, the
following shall be taken into account:
1) The diversity of the animal and plant species.
2) The endemic species and those indanger of extinction.
3) The biological inventorying and monitoring of Biodiversity.
4) Knowledge and traditional use by the local and indigenous communities.
5) The technology for managing the species of greatest use.
Art. 66. The Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources shall determine the list of the
species in danger of extinction, threatened, or protected, which shall be subjected to rigorous
control and protection mechanisms in situ and ex situ , that guarantee their recovery and
conservation according to the special laws and/or regional and international conventions.
Art. 67. The establishment of wild animal breeding farms for commercial purposes or scientific
activities for threatened species, endangered species, or species in danger of extinction, shall be
regulated by Law.
Art. 68. The introduction into the country and the removal therefrom of animal and plant
species, must be authorized in advance by the competent authority, according to the principles
and standards set in nationa l law, in the International Treaties and Conventions signed and
ratified by Nicaragua.
Art. 69. The Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources shall inventory and record the
biological diversity of the country, for which it may coordinate with and rely on national and
Foreign research centers.
Art. 70. In order to regulate the safekeeping and preservation of the biological diversity of the
country, a maximum period of six months is established to present a draft Biodiversity Act, from
the effective date of the present Act, which shall reflect, among other things, the following:
1) The Protected Natural Areas.
2) Genetic Resources.
3) Species – animal and plant.
28 Annex 29
4) In situ and ex situ conservation.
5) Sustainable use and exploitation of the Biodiversity resources.
Art. 71. For the purposes of safeguarding biological diversity, the Ministry of the Environment
and Natural Resources shall:
1) Establish closed systems.
2) Set export quotas for species of fauna, hunting and capture.
3) Prohibit shipments of wildlife products, both those originating in Nicaragua and
those in transit, in any phase of their shipment or transfer, when it is suspected
that it is an illegal trade or the provisions of this Law and its Regulations are
being violated, remaining exempt from any type of liability.
Chapter II
Water
Section I
Common Rules
Art. 72. Water, in any of its states, is in the public domain. The State also reserves ownership of
ocean, river, and lake beaches; the beds of flowing waters an d the beds of natural deposits of
water; salty lands, dry land up to thirty meters after the maximum line or the permanent course of
rivers and lakes and the stratums or deposits of subterranean waters.
Art. 73. It is the obligation of the State and of a ll natural or legal persons who perform activities
in the national territory and its jurisdictional waters to protect and conserve the aquatic
ecosystems, guaranteeing their sustainability.
Art. 74. The use, handling, and exploitation of aquatic, coastal ecosystems and the hydro -
biological resources contained therein, shall be performed on a sustainable basis and in
accordance with management plans that guarantee the conservation thereof.
Art. 75. Human consumption and public service needs shall enjoy priority in the use of water.
Health Centers and Health Stations, where there are such, and the Municipal and Communal
authorities, shall include in their programs related to environmental health, a chapter that
establishes and expands upon the subject of Education on the Management, Obtainment,
conservation and use of water for human consumption. The use thereof does not protect any form
of abuse of the resource.
29Annex 29
Art. 76. All people have a right to use water to meet their basic needs, provided that this does
not cause harm to third parties nor imply diversions or storage, nor the use of a machine or the
performance of activities that in any manner damage the bed and its shores, alter them,
contaminate them or prevent their exploitation by third parties.
Art. 77. Save the exceptions contained in this law, the use of water shall require prior
authorization, especially in the following cases:
1) Establishing transportation, tourism, recreation, or sporting services in lakes,
lagoons, rivers, and other bodies or currents of water.
2) Commercial Exploitation of the Fauna and other life forms contained therein.
3) Exploitation of the biodiversity existing in the aquatic resources.
4) Use of beaches or riverbanks.
5) Dumping wastewater or water from rainwater drainage systems.
6) Injecting wastewater resulting from geothermal activity.
7) Any other use that leads to profit for those that undertake it.
Art. 78. To authorize the use of water, institutions with a mandate shall take the following
provisions into account:
1) Consider the balanced interrelationship with the other resources and the
functioning of the water cycle, especially protection of the soil, wooded areas,
geological formations, and the areas where aquifers are recharged.
2) Promote the integrated management of water basins.
3) Protect the species of the Ecosystem of the aquatic and coastal land System,
especially the endemic and threatened ones, and those in danger of extinction.
4) Avoid the use or processing of any element in the wate r system that could harm
the physical, chemical, or bacteriological conditions of the water.
Art. 79. The competent authority, if the sustainable use of the water resource is jeopardized
because of accidents, natural disasters, contamination, or abuse of use, may restrict, amend, or
cancel such concessions, permits, or authorizations granted.
Art. 80. The duration of the concessions and authorizations, their requirements and procedures
for processing, shall be subject insofar as applicable to the provisions established by law.
For the granting of water rights, the principle of transparency and public bidding shall be used as
30 Annex 29
basic criteria, with preference given to those that lead to the most rational use of the water and its
surroundings.
Art. 81. The following constitute obligations of the beneficiaries of water -usage concessions or
authorizations:
1) Obtaining prior approval for works to capture, control, conduct, store, or
distribute water.
2) Having instruments that allow them to ascertain and measure the amount of water
diverted or consumed.
3) Exploiting the water with efficiency and economy, using optimal capture and
utilization systems.
4) Returning excess water to its original source or give it the use stipulated in the
concession or authorization.
5) Avoiding overflows, on public roadways and other properties, of stored water or
rainwater.
6) Performing on a provisional basis defensive works in case of flash flooding or
other similar situations of force majeure.
7) Setting up the system s necessary to allow the passage of aquatic fauna, when
waterworks are built.
8) Assisting the competent authority in its monitoring and inspection work and
providing it such information as it requires on the use of water.
9) Contributing in the terms th at are established in the concession or authorization,
to the conservation of hydraulic structures, suitable plant coverage, security roads
and other common works and facilities.
10) Immediately establishing the necessary measures and building works that prevent
physical, chemical, or biological contamination that implies a hazard to the
ecosystem and to human health.
Art. 82. Authorizations for the exploitation of subterranean waters may be revised, amended, or
canceled, when the hydrogeological circums tances of overexploitation or the risk of such so
require. Likewise, closed periods for the use of the water in the subsoil may be established.
Art. 83. The competent authority, in view of the use that is given to the water, the availability
thereof, and the special characteristics of the water table, may establish annual volume standards
for maximum extraction, the control and application of which shall fall under the jurisdiction of
the Autonomous Regional Governments and the Municipalities.
31Annex 29
Section II
Continental Waters
Art. 84. Continental surface waters, as well as the subterranean water that forms part of the
water cycle, constitute a single resource, subordinated to the general interest, which forms part of
the public domain. The ownership, use, and limitations thereof must be regulated.
Art. 85. In no case may private parties artificially modify the atmospheric phase of the water
cycle, without express authorization from a competent authority,
Art. 86. Compliance with the rules, recommenda tions, and other measures that the Ministry of
the Environment and Natural Resources establishes shall be binding upon the owners, holders, or
managers of water usage.
Art. 87. Thermal, medicinal waters, and waters with other special properties shall be exploited
by the State, through its own entities or through concessions.
[…]
Chapter III
The Soil
Section I
Common Rules
Art. 95. For the use and management of the Soil and terrestrial ecosystems, the following shall
be taken into account:
1) Compatibility with the natural use thereof, ensuring maintenance of the
physiochemical characteristics and productive capacity thereof. All human
activities shall respect the equilibrium of the ecosystems.
2) Avoid practices that cause erosion, degradation, or modification of the
Topological and geomorphologic characteristics with negative effects.
Art. 96. In lands with a slope Greater than or equal to 35%, the owners, tenants, or users shall
maintain the plant coverage of the soil and introduce crops and te chnologies suitable to prevent
or correct the degradation thereof.
Art. 97. In those areas where the soil has high levels of degradation or the threat thereof, the
Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock, in coordination with the Ministry of the Environment and
Natural Resources and the respective Municipal Councils and Autonomous Regions, may declare
32 Annex 29
soil conservation areas within defined limits, establishing standards for management whose
purpose is to stop the its deterioration and ensure its recovery and protection.
Section II
Rules for Protection of Forestland
Art. 98. Lands defined as forested or suitable for forestry must be exploited on a sustainable
basis and they may not be subjected to changes of use.
Art. 99. The management of forestland shall be governed by the following classification:
1) Forestry production area: Where the use must be for the sustainable development
of forestry resources.
2) Forestry conservation area: That which must be kept permanently with forest
coverage for the protection and conservation of the biodiversity, soil, and/or
water.
Art. 100. For the use and exploitation of the forestry production areas with timber -yielding non-
timber-yielding products [sic], they must be subjected to forestry management on a sustai nable
basis, with the application of suitable methods and technologies that guarantee an optimal yield.
Art. 101. For the use, administration, and management of forestland, the following principles
shall be taken into account:
1) The sustainability of the forestry ecosystem.
2) The interdependence existing between the forest and the soil.
3) The function that the forests perform in the water cycle.
4) The protection of the Soil, sources and flows of water, such that they maintain
their quality and basic volume flows.
5) The importance of the forest as a habitat for wild fauna and flora, protecting
biodiversity.
6) The economic, social, and cultural benefits consistent with sustainable
development.
Chapter IV
Nonrenewable Natural Resources
Art. 102. Nonrenewable Resources are those which cannot be returned to their natural state,
33Annex 29
such as minerals, hydrocarbons, and other substances in the soil and subsoil, the purpose of the
exploitation of which is the extraction and utilization thereof.
Art. 103. Nonrenewable natural resources, as they are under the ownership of the State, may
have their exploration and exploitation assigned by the latter through a concessions regime in
such manner and under such conditions as are established in the specific laws and their
regulations.
Art. 104. For the exploration and exploitation of nonrenewable natural resources, beyond
respecting the restrictive measures of protection for the mineral resources or the subsoil in
general, the competent authority shall necessarily:
1) Ensure the rational exploitation of raw materials and the rational exploitation of
deposits.
2) Demand safe processing and disposal of waste materials.
3) Promote the efficient use of energy.
4) Prevent the direct or indirect alteration of ecosystem elements, especially cuttings,
tailings, and runoffs from mines.
5) Ensure the protection of protected areas and fragile ecosystems and the restoration
of the environments that are degraded because of the activities exploiting
nonrenewable resources.
Art. 105. Concessionaires of mining and hydrocarbon explorations and exploitations are
prohibited from dumping toxic and nontoxic waste on land, in rivers, lakes, lagoons, and any
other course or source of water without being properly treated, which harm human health and the
environment.
Art. 106. Renewable and nonrenewable natural resources that are in legally protected areas shall
not be subject to exploration and exploitation.
Art. 107. Mineral deposits and other geological resources are classified for the effects of this act
into the following groups:
1) Minerals whose principal commercial or industrial content are metallic elements.
2) Minerals whose principal commercial or industrial content are nonmetallic
elements.
3) Mineral substances and rocks used directly in infrastructure and construction
works that do not require operations other than digging, fragmentation, and
classification.
34 Annex 29
Art. 108. The Extraction of metallic and nonmetallic minerals, the extraction of stone and sand,
the extraction and industrialization of salt and the manufacturing of cement, shall be subject to
the technical rules that are established by the specific law and the regulation thereof in order to
prevent the negative impact that such activities might cause to the environment and to human
health.
Title IV
Environmental Quality
Chapter I
Common Rules
Art. 109. All inhabitants have a right to enjoy a healthy environment in natural landscapes and
the duty to contribute to the preservation thereof. The Stat e has the duty to guarantee the
prevention of adverse environmental factors that affect the health and quality of life of the
people, by establishing the corresponding rules.
Art. 110. To promote and preserve the environmental quality of human settlement s, it shall be
obligatory to ensure a balanced relationship between the natural elements that serve as support
and surroundings, delimiting the industrial, services, and residential areas, urban/rural transition
areas, green spaces, and areas of contact wi th nature, as well as the prevention and adoption of
good environmental quality criteria in building construction.
Art. 111. The Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources, in coordination with the
institutions of the State, Autonomous Governments and municipal governments:
1) Shall guide the monitoring and control of the fixed and mobile sources of
contamination, contaminants, and the quality of ecosystems.
2) Shall issue ecosystem quality standards and rules, which shall act as guidelines
for environmental regulation and management.
3) Shall issue rules for technology, processes, treatment and standards for emissions,
spillage, waste and noise.
4) Shall issue rules on the location of contaminating or hazardous activities and on
the areas of influence thereof.
Art. 112. All processes, machinery and equipment, consumables, products, and waste, whose
importation, exportation, use, or handling could damage the environment or natural resources or
affect human health, shall be subject to regulation and control by the competent authorities.
Art. 113. The direct dumping of contaminating substances or waste in the soil, rivers, lakes,
35Annex 29
lagoons, and any other course of water, is prohibited.
The Ministry of Health, in coordination with the Ministry of the Environment and natural
Resources, shall issue regulations for the disposal, discarding, or elimination of Substances,
materials, and products, or their containers, which because of their toxic nature could
contaminate the soil, the subsoil, aquifers, or surface waters.
Art. 114. The Natural or Legal Persons responsible for an activity who because of their own or
accidental actions have caused environmental degradation, shall immediately take the measures
necessary to control the effect thereof, and s hall notify the Ministry of the Environment and
Natural Resources, and the Ministry of Health.
Art. 115. All natural or legal persons are obligated to provide any information requested to the
environmental authority, and to facilitate inspections, in accordance with established procedures,
on the properties, in the facilities or places where contaminating activities originate.
Art. 116. In case of noncompliance with resolutions issued in environmental matters, the
competent authority shall limit or suspend that activity, temporarily or permanently.
Art. 117. In urban development Plans the competent authority shall take into account the
topographical, geomorphologic, climatologic, and meteorological conditions in order to reduce
the risk of any contamination that might occur.
Art. 118. No contaminating systems, procedures, materials, or products whose use is prohibited
in the country of origin may be introduced into the national territory.
Art. 119. The importation of equipment, processes, or systems and materials that use atomic
energy, cobalt, or another radioactive material, shall be regulated by the competent authority.
Art. 120. Industrial, commercial, or service activities deemed hazardous because of the
seriousness of the effects that they can cause on ecosystems or to human health, shall be
governed and controlled by the Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources and the
Ministry of Health. The Regulation shall include rules on the location, construction, functioning,
and rescue plans to reduce the risk and impact of a possible accident.
Chapter II
Air, Water, and Ground Contamination
Art. 121. Activities that affect health through their odor, noise, or lack of hygiene shall be
governed and regulated by the Ministry of Health.
Art. 122. The Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources, in coordination with the
Ministry of Construction and Transport and the National Police, shall regulate the control of
contaminating gaseous emissions caused by motor vehicles.
36 Annex 29
Art. 123. Filmi ng in closed public locations is prohibited, among them: cinemas, theaters,
transportation media, restaurants, public offices, and hospitals as is, the burning of toxins on
public roads, such as tires and other toxins that damage the respiratory systems of people.
Art. 124. Crop dusting with agricultural chemicals shall be governed by the competent authority,
establishing application distances and concentrations, further considering the existence of towns,
hamlets, tourism centers, and sources of water.
Art. 125. The Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources, as the competent authority,
shall determine, in consultation with the sectors involved, the ultimate destination of wastewater,
the characteristics of receptacle, and prior treatment, as well as allowable concentrations and
quantities.
Art. 126. The location in potable water storage areas, of facilities whose waste, even when
treated, causes contamination of physical, chemical, organic, thermal, radioactive objects or
objects of any other nature, or that have potential risks of contamination, shall be prohibited.
Art. 127. Sewage may be used only after having been subjected to purification processes and
upon authorization from the Ministry of Health.
Art. 128. Any activity that causes s alinization, alteration, desertification, or aridification, is
prohibited.
Chapter III
Nonhazardous Solid Waste
Art. 129. Municipal governments shall operate systems for the collection, treatment, and final
disposal of the Municipality’s nonhazardous s olid waste, pursuant to the official standards that
are issued by the Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources and the Ministry of Health,
to protect the environment and health.
Art. 130. The State shall foster and incentivize the recycling of household and commercial waste
for industrialization thereof, through the technical and sanitary procedures that are approved by
the competent authorities.
[…]
Chapter III
Applicable Penalties
Art. 148. The following are established as administrative s anctions: retention or intervention,
closing, cancellation, suspension, and fines.
Art. 149. Violations of this Act and its regulations shall be penalized administratively, gradually,
37Annex 29
with the following penalties:
1) Warning through notification by a c ompetent authority, evaluated under an
evaluation criterion of the magnitude of the environmental impact, establishing
the measures and times for the correction of the factors that damage the
environment.
2) A fine whose amount shall be established by taking into account the seriousness
of the consequences and recidivism, in a Range of one thousand to fifty thousand
cordobas, depending on economic capacity and the damage caused.
3) Temporary suspension or cancellation of permits, authorizations, licenses,
concessions, and/or any other right to perform the activity.
4) Partial, full, temporary, or permanent suspension of activities or closing of
facilities.
Art. 150. When the seriousness of the violation so warrants, the competent authority shall
suspend, revoke, or cancel the concession, permit, license, and in general the authorization
granted for the performance of partial, industrial, or service activities or for the exploitation of
natural resources that has given rise to paying for the violation.
Art. 151. All fines or penalties shall become active within the time frames that are established
for each case. Twenty-five percent of the revenue derived from fines shall be deposited with the
Government of the Municipality where the damage occurred, and the remaining seventy -five
percent to the national Environment fund, to be used for programs for the preservation of the
environment and quality of life of the inhabitants of the Country.
38 Annex 30
Excerpt of “Dictamen Juridico 351, (C-351-2006),
Mauricio Castro Lizano, DeputyAttorney General
(ProcuradorAdjunto)”, 31August 2006. (1)
Available at: http://www.pgr.go.cr/scij/busqueda/normativa/
pronunciamiento/pro_ficha.asp?param6=1&nDictamen=14094
Excerpt of “Northern Channels (Tortuguero)” (2)
Available at http://www.japdeva.go.cr/adm_desarrollo/
proyectos_regionales/canales.html
3940 Annex 30
Excerpt of "Dictamen Juridico 351, (C-351-2006), Mauricio Castro Lizano, Deputy Attorney
General (Procurador Adjunto)", 31 August 2006.(1)
Available at:
http://www.pgr.go.cr/scij/busqueda/normativa/pronunciamiento/pro_ficha…
ictamen=14094
"5) Twentieth Century, development of canals in the lagoons, springs and rivers of
the Northern Caribbean.
On 21 April 1908, engineer Luis Fournier presented a report to the Public Works
Directorate on the Palmas Spring canal project and a study on the connection of Norte
Tortuguero Lagoon with Simon Lagoon and the Colorado River. The report indicated that
the Palmas Spring was very swampy and twisted and required draining 18 kilometres,
therefore, it was a very costly and unrealistic route . In its place, he suggested use of
Northern Tortuguero Lagoon which has a 13 kilometre 822 meter stretch which can be
navigated, and only four kilometres 200 meters would have to be opened for the canal.
(1907-08 Development Archives quoted by the Public Works Ministry, Preliminary Canal
Project, Atlantic Lagoons, 1961, pgs. 10- 13; see also the plan design 7015, dated 26
February 1908, developed by engineer Fournier – in the National Archives).
Law No. 45 of 4 August 1916 authorized the Executive Branch t o allocate 50 million
colones for the opening of the springs that connect Simón Lagoon of the Colorado River
with Tortuguero Lagoon, which have capacity for the navigation of ships that could transit
the Parismina Rivera. (Second Semester Laws and Decrees,pgs. 118-119.)”
Further: “Law No. 20 of 17 June 1924 allocated resources for the Executive Branch to
appoint a Commission to study engineer Fournier’s reports, and issue a report regarding
the difficulty of navigating through the lagoons, how to facilit ate use of the waterway and
how much that would cost (First Semester Laws and Decrees, pg. 312).
41Annex 30
Law 21 of 22 June 1888 was cited as an antecedent as it declared that the territory
between the mouth of Tortuguero through to Cape Santa Elena in Murciélago could not be
ceded (National Archives of the 9498 Congress). The budget was increased through Law
No. 69 of 6 February 1925. This law included a study regarding the connection of the
Northern Zone and the Tortuguero Plains with a port in any area of the c oast from the
Colorado River to Moín. Engineer W. Sprung was in charge of the study (First Semester
Laws and Decrees, pg. 355; National Archives of the 14.120 Congress).
In his report on the creation of a canal between Colorado River and Moín, engineer
Sprung explained the advantages Moín presented as a natural port, and the
geomorphologic factors that came into play in the formation of the coastal strip:
“The Moín Lagoon has the advantage that it drains into a protected bay, the Moín bay, and
it has no je tties as is generally the case at the mouths of rivers. Thus, that lagoon could
give easy and safe exit to the ocean at any time of year and in any weather conditions.
This circumstance, as such very rare, is explained by the fact that the Moín Lagoon has a
scant current because the water that feeds into it does not flow from rivers at high
altitudes; also by the fact that its current does not carry much sediment… a peninsula that
extends north forms a natural barrier against the currents of the ocean and t heir
movements. This neutralizes the negative effect of the northern winds that blow there.
Through this circumstance and the sudden depths of the water, nature has made this area
appropriate for a natural port, contrary to the Limón roadstead which is exposed to the
effect of its winds. However, we are not attempting to demonstrate the advantages of the
Moín Port, but rather to indicate that the projected waterway will give easy access to the
railroad and to the ocean. Costa Rica’s northern coast between L imón and San Juan del
Norte is irrigated by a number of rivers which through their carriage of debris and
sediment have contributed to the formation of the coastal strip. According to the opinion
42 Law 21 of 22 June 1888 was cited as an antecedent as it declared that the territory
between the mouth of Tortuguero through to Cape Santa Elena in Murciélago could not be
ceded (National Archives of the 9498 Congress). The budget was increased through Law
No. 69 of 6 February 1925. This law included a study regarding the connection of the
Northern Zone and the Tortuguero Plains with a port in any area of the c oast from the
Colorado River to Moín. Engineer W. Sprung was in charge of the study (First Semester
Laws and Decrees, pg. 355; National Archives of the 14.120 Congress).
In his report on the creation of a canal between Colorado River and Moín, engineer
Sprung explained the advantages Moín presented as a natural port, and the
geomorphologic factors that came into play in the formation of the coastal strip:
“The Moín Lagoon has the advantage that it drains into a protected bay, the Moín bay, and
it has no je tties as is generally the case at the mouths of rivers. Thus, that lagoon could
give easy and safe exit to the ocean at any time of year and in any weather conditions.
This circumstance, as such very rare, is explained by the fact that the Moín Lagoon has a
scant current because the water that feeds into it does not flow from rivers at high
altitudes; also by the fact that its current does not carry much sediment… a peninsula that
extends north forms a natural barrier against the currents of the ocean and t heir
movements. This neutralizes the negative effect of the northern winds that blow there.
Through this circumstance and the sudden depths of the water, nature has made this area
appropriate for a natural port, contrary to the Limón roadstead which is exposed to the
effect of its winds. However, we are not attempting to demonstrate the advantages of the
Moín Port, but rather to indicate that the projected waterway will give easy access to the
railroad and to the ocean. Costa Rica’s northern coast between L imón and San Juan del
Norte is irrigated by a number of rivers which through their carriage of debris and
sediment have contributed to the formation of the coastal strip. According to the opinionAnnex 30
project for the canals in the Atlantic Lagoons could be completed (First Semester Laws
and Decrees, pgs. 993-994).
After almost ten years of work, Decree No. 3729 of 3 May 1974 (La Gaceta, No. 85 of
7 May 1974) declared the inauguration of a navigation system in the 112 kilometres of
natural and artificial canals between Moín and Barra de Colorado, with the Moín, Pacuare,
Parismina, Tortuguero and Barra del Colorado terminals. The canals were created between
the following areas: 1. Moín – Dos Bocas; 2. Dos Bocas – Matina River; 3. Matina River
– Urpiano Lagoon; 4. Urpiano Lagoon – Santa Marta River; 5. Santa Marta River –
Pacuare River; 6. Pacuare River – Chiquero River; 7. Chiquero River – Parismina; 8.
Parismina – Northern Penitencia Spring; 9. Northern Penitencia Spring – Samay Lagoon;
10. Samay Lagoon – Barra de Colorado.
44 Annex 30
Excerpt of "Northern Channels (Tortuguero)" (2)
Available at:
http://www.japdeva.go.cr/adm_desarrollo/proyectos_regionales/canales.ht…
Through its Northern Canals Department, JAPDEVA issued a study which indicated that:
“One of the activities JAPDEVA has invested in and which has stimulated development of the
tourism sector for years, has been the northern canals. This investment has been concerned
with good maintenance of water arteries in order that tourists may enjoy the best eco -tourism
in the zone and that the populace may easily engage in its daily activities.
The whole of the northern basin of Limón Province drains into the Northern Canals,
large amounts of sediment are carried by rivers from higher lands to the water arteries where
the sediment settles and obstructs the navigation of vessels loaded with merchandise, tourists,
etc. In recent decades, this is where JAPDEVA has invested a part of its financial resources in
order to maintain these arteries in optimal conditions for navigation. It has continuously
carried out suction dredging and other maintenance activity here.
The earthquake that hit Limón Province in 1991 accelerated deterioration of the canals
leaving some stretches obstructed.
Besides that, different projects including banana growing and other agricultural
activities, cattle raising, work by the ICE, the municipalities and the MINAE, involved
cultivation, draining, building of roads, extraction of rocks from the rivers, cleaning of dams
(Cachi) and rerouting the paths of waterways. This affected and significantly increased the
sediment deposited in the canals.
The study goes on to state that “As the result of an accord of Special Session 5- 97 of
the Administration Council, Article XX, which took place on 30 October 1997, Public
Solicitation AD-3-97 was granted for the purchase of suction draining equipment from the HT
45Annex 30
Purdy Company, Inc., for a total of 598.560.12 us dollar ( 144 millon colones). Another piece
1
of equipment was purchased for a total of ¢41.500.000 million colones."
The same document indicates that “On the operational level the Northern Canals
Region is responsible for:
• Dredging 350,000 cubic meters of sediment, and the elimination of 100,000 square
meters of water vegetation.
• Controlling land use and development (control of de -forestation, and extreme
exploitation of the land).
• Elimination of tree trunks and other objects that may obstruct the waterways.
• Support to government and private institutions as well as other divisions of JAPVEDA
involved in the development of the zone.
In order to engage in these maintenance functions, the Northern Canals has two suction
drainage machines, boats and motors, and other equipment, as well as 15 workers
including the secretary and the chief officer.”
The study also indicates that “In this study the Northern Canals are considered to
encompass the whole of the waterways network where the canals are located between the
Moín Terminal all the way to Puerto Lindo , including Moín Lagoon, Las Vueltas River,
the Moín Plaset artificial canal, Plaset Lagoon, Matina River, the Matina River canal, the
Madre de Díos Lagoon, Pacuare River, the Pacuare -Chiquero artificial canal, Chiquero
River, Parismina River, the Black Spring, Tortuguero Lagoon, Penitencia River, artificial
canal, the Penitencia- Sammy Spring, Sammy River, Colorado River, Aguas Dulces
Lagoon.”
1
http://www.japdeva.go.cr/adm_desarrollo/proyectos_regionales/canales.ht…
46 Annex 31
Nicaraguan Decree No. 01-2007
Regulation of Protected Areas in Nicaragua
8 January 2007
4748 Annex 31
OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE
REPUBLIC OF NICARAGUA
DECREE No. 01-2007
The President of the Republic of Nicaragua
In use of the authorities granted to him by the Political Constitution
HAS ISSUED
The following:
DECREE
REGULATION OF PROTECTED AREAS IN NICARAGUA
CHAPTER I
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Art. 1. The objective of this Regulation is to establish the necessary provisions related to the
protected areas under Title II, Chapter II, Section III of the General Environment and Natural
Resources Act.
Art. 2. When reference is made in this Regulation to the Act, it shall be understood as referring
to Law No. 217, General Environment and Natural Resources Act, published in La Gaceta
Official Gazette No. 105 on June 6, 1996.
CHAPTER II
DEFINITIONS
Art. 3. For the effects of this Regulation, the following concepts have the definitions that are
herein assigned to them:
1. MANAGEMENT OF PROTECTED AREAS: This includes the performance of planning,
organization, management and control actions that are permed in a protected area of the
National Protected Areas System, SINAP, for the development and protection of the natural
resources existing therein, as established in the management category and the respective
management plan for the protected area. The management of the SINAP protected areas
appertains to the Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources, MARENA, which may
assign it in Co-Management pursuant to the laws in force and the procedures established to that
end.
2. PROTECTED AREAS : Those a reas whose purpose is the conservation, rational
management, and restoration of the flora, wild fauna, and other similar life forms, as well as
biodiversity and the biosphere. Likewise included in this category are those species in the
49Annex 31
national territory that are protected in order to restore and conserve geomorphologic phenomena,
sites of historic, archeological, cultural, scenic, or recreational importance.
3. MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES: Those activities that are performed by legal and/or natural
persons who, without having been granted co-management of a protected area or part thereof, are
authorized by MARENA to perform management and conservation activities in the protected
area.
4. CAPACITY: These are the limits that ecosystems and the biosphere can bear without
suffering serious deterioration.
5. CATEGORY OF PROTECTED AREA MANAGEMENT : The name that is given to a
protected area as a function of the evaluation of the biophysical and socioeconomic
characteristics intrinsic to the area and the conserv ation objectives that it must meet. Each
management category represents different degrees of human involvement and has its own
restrictions regarding the use of its resources.
6. CONSERVATION: The application of the measures that are necessary to preser ve,
improve, maintain, rehabilitate and restore populations, and ecosystems, without affecting the
sustainable exploitation thereof.
7. BIOLOGICAL CORRIDOR: A geographical space that provides connectivity between
landscapes, ecosystems, natural habitats and the protected areas, whose objective is conservation
of biodiversity, sustainable local development, and the ecological viability of the system.
8. CO-MANAGEMENT OF PROTECTED AREAS: This is a model for managing protected
areas, under which MARENA, as administrator of the National Protected Areas System
(SINAP), pursuant to the management directives of each protected area, may assign the
management of a protected area to nonprofit Nicaraguan entities and institutions, municipalities,
universities, sc ientific institutions, cooperatives, and indigenous and ethnic communities as
established in the legislation that governs the matter, called Co -Managers in a relationship of
shared responsibilities, that involves and coordinates all of those involved who a ffect a protected
area.
9. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: To improve the quality of human life without
exceeding the capacity of the ecosystems that sustain it.
10. DGAP : Initials of the General Department of Protected Areas of the Ministry of the
Environment and Natural Resources (MARENA).
11. TERRITORIAL OFFICES : A decentralized technical, operational, and administrative
unit in the national territory, with the mandate to represent MARENA in its institutional
management of natural resources and the environment.
12. BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY: Biological diversity is construed as the variability of living
50 Annex 31
organisms of any source, including, among other things, land and marine ecosystems and other
aquatic ecosystems and the ecological complexes of which they are part; it includes diversity
within each species, amongst species, and ecosystems.
13. ECOSYSTEMS: A basic unit of interaction among living organisms and their relationship
with the environment.
14. EXOTIC SPECIES: These are those species that are not native to a zone or region.
15. NATIVE SPECIES : Plant or fauna species that are inherent to a zone or region, whose
ability to reproduce and survive depends on the environment conditions in their natural
environment.
16. WILD FAUNA: Animal spec ies that subsist subject to processes of natural selection,
whose populations develop in nature.
17. WILD FLORA : Plant species that subsist subject to process of natural selection and that
develop freely in nature.
18. PARK RANGER: A person authorize d by the competent authority to perform security,
promotion, education, interpretation, monitoring, maintenance and control activities in the
SINAP protected areas, as established in the Management Plan, this regulation, and other
resolutions that are issued by the competent authority.
19. SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH : An activity that involves gathering or not gathering data,
gathering or not gathering samples, for the subsequent processing and analysis thereof in order to
deepen or discover new theories, hypotheses, or ideas. Included within this context are all
specific forms and activities of research, such as applied research, and action or participatory
research, recompilations and/or systematizations of traditional knowledge, etc.
20. COLLABORATIVE MANAGE MENT: An institutional mechanism or arrangement
through joint agreement between MARENA and others, for the implementation of actions in a
specific part of a protected area, in order to achieve the final conservation and sustainable use
objectives in the a rea. This agreement is not subject to the criteria established under the
definition of co-management.
21. MANAGEMENT PLAN: A technical / scientific instrument required to manage and/or
operate a SINAP Protected Area and its buffer zone.
22. ANNUAL OPERATING PLAN (POA): An annual planning document that facilitates the
management of a SINAP protected area.
23. PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN : This is a planning tool that guides the
management of properties located in SINAP protected areas, according to the management
directives of each protected area.
51Annex 31
24. ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT : A document granted by the competent authority upon
request by the proponent of a project, that certifies that from the environmental protection point
of view, the activity can be ex ecuted under the condition of complying with the measures
established in the respective permit.
25. PRESERVATION: Maintaining the original condition of a protected area, reducing human
involvement itself.
26. PROVISION OF SERVICES : Those activities p erformed by natural or legal persons
within the protected area, authorized by the Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources,
aimed at providing a service compatible with the management category and/or management plan
of the protected area.
27. SP ORTS FISHING . That which is done for recreational, tourism, entertainment, or
competitive sports purposes.
28. PRIVATE WILDLIFE RESERVES : Private areas used for the conservation of
biodiversity and representative ecosystems, recognized by MARENA.
29. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES: These are benefits that ecosystems provide to society
and that directly or indirectly affect the protection and improvement of the environment and the
quality of life of people.
30. NATIONAL SYSTEM OF PROTECTED AREAS (SINAP): Set of Protected Areas
declared in accordance with current law and those that will be declared in the future, whose
natural, social, and cultural relevance, locally, nationally, and internationally, are recognized in
the management categories established byLaw and this Regulation. Private Wildlife Reserves, as
well as the legal and administrative environmental management instruments, for part of this
system with their specific regulations.
31. DEPARTMENT OF BIOSPHERE RESERVES . A decentralized administrat ive agency
of MARENA, whose objective is the management, planning, coordination, and fostering of
integrated development and protection of the Biosphere Reserves.
32. WILDLIFE : Species of undomesticated flora and fauna that develop freely in nature
without human intervention.
33. BUFFER ZONE : An adjacent or surrounding area that has a direct effect on the SINAP
protected areas, subject to the promotion of sustainable development activities, which support the
management objectives and minimize the nega tive impacts inside of the SINAP protected areas.
Buffer zones perform biological connection and corridor functions, where sustainable production
models are implemented that reduce vulnerability and environmental impacts and foster social
and inter-institutional cooperation.
34. ZONING. A concept used in the planning of protected areas, which allows us to organize
the territory in accordance with its potentials, to facilitate the management and operation thereof.
52 Annex 31
CHAPTER III
JURISDICTION AND AUTHORITIES
Section I
Competent Authority
Art. 4. The Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources (MARENA) is the competent
authority to apply this Regulation and such other provisions as are issued on the matter.
Art. 5. MARENA may agree with the Regional Governments and Municipal Governments upon
the performance of actions to manage the protected areas within the framework of their
competencies.
Section II
Jurisdiction of MARENA in the SINAP Protected Areas
Art. 6. MARENA, as the governing, regulatory , management, and administrative entity of the
protected areas, shall have the following competencies:
1. To promote and facilitate processes for the conservation of the natural and cultural resources
and biodiversity in the SINAP protected areas, throug h the formulation and execution of plans
and programs that favor the protection of biodiversity and the application of the existing legal
and regulatory framework.
2. To promote management, scientific research, environmental education, and sustainable
development activities in the SINAP protected areas.
3. To administer such resources as are assigned in the Budget of the Republic and other forms of
financial revenue, for the performance of its functions and authorities.
4. In the cases of protected areas located in border zones, to manage for the Ministry of Foreign
Relations the signing of cooperation agreements with the neighboring country or countries, to the
benefit of the respective protected areas. These agreements, to be valid and take effect, s hall be
published in La Gaceta, the Official Gazette.
Art. 7. The General Department of Protected Areas is responsible for:
1. Administering the National System of Protected Areas.
2. Preparing, executing, and ensuring compliance with the national, r egional, and international
policies and strategies for the development of the National System of Protected Areas, in
coordination with the Offices of the Biosphere Reserves, if applicable.
3. Proposing to the corresponding authorities the creation of new national protected areas and/or
the expansion or reduction of the existing ones based on the pertinent technical studies.
53Annex 31
4. Defining and establishing the limits of the SINAP protected areas to be made official by the
Nicaraguan Institute of Territorial Studies (INETER).
5. Preparing rules, laws, regulations, and procedures to facilitate the sustainable management
and use of the national protected areas and Private Wildlife Reserves.
6. Directing and coordinating the processes of granting protected a reas in co-management with
interested entities.
7. Approving the terms of reference for the formulation of Management Plans.
8. Providing technical assistance to the Territorial Offices of MARENA in the processes of
formulating and monitoring the annual operating plans of the SINAP protected areas.
9. Reviewing, reporting on, and approving the Management Plans for the SINAP protected ares.
10. Preparing the criteria, requirements, and administrative procedures for the performance of
activities to us e and exploit natural resources and produce goods and services in the SINAP
Protected Areas.
11. Promoting and coordinating the formulation and implementation involving the communities,
municipal governments, government institutions, productive sectors, and autonomous regions, in
a manner in accord with the management mechanisms and sustainability criteria in the buffer
zones of the SINAP protected areas,
12. Authorizing the Scientific study and research activities in the SINAP protected areas.
13. Pr eparing the SINAP training schedule and plan and coordinating the implementation
thereof with the persons involved.
14. Providing technical assistance to the Territorial Offices in the processes of issuing
authorizations for activities to use and exploit natural resources and produce goods and services
in Protected Areas.
15. Promoting and supporting integrated sectoral programs and projects for developing and
exploiting the protected areas and their resources for the national economic benefit and as a
function of the self-sustainability of the protected areas.
16. Ensuring compliance with international agreements in matters of national and cross -border
protected areas.
17. Implementing technical guidelines and operational practices in protected areas for the
management of ecosystems shared bi-nationally.
18. Facilitating inter -institutional support of the activities for consolidating local sustainable
54 Annex 31
development biological corridors that ensure the connectivity of the National System of
Protected Areas.
19. Establishing and managing a permanent database of the current information existing or
which might be generated in the future in the SINAP protected areas, which shall fall within the
guidelines of the National Environmental Information System. The database shall include
information on at least the following subjects:
19.1 Legal basis of the protected areas.
19.2 Statistical records of visits.
19.3 Information on land tenancy in the protected areas.
19.4 Annual summary of the most important matters occurring in the SINAP protected areas.
19.5 Legal and administrative provisions appertaining to the management of the protected areas.
19.6 Studies and research on biodiversity undertaken in the protected areas.
19.7 Record of permits issued annually in the protected areas.
19.8 Record of current personnel who work in the protected areas.
19.9 Governmental structures related to the administration thereof.
Art. 8. The Offices of the Biosphere Reserves are responsible for:
1. Directing, organizing, and administering the Biosphere Reserves in accordance with the
policies, rules, and other regulations that are approved.
2. Proposing and participating in the preparation of policies, rules, and regulations to be applied
in the Reserve.
3. Preparing t he terms of reference for the formulation of management plans for Biosphere
Reserves and the protected areas that form them, in coordination of the respective Territorial
Offices.
4. Monitoring the process of formulating, approving, and implementing mana gement plans for
the Biosphere Reserve and its protected areas.
5. Promoting and proposing research, tourism, and sustainable production activities in the
Biosphere Reserves and the protected areas that form them.
6. Monitoring the scientific study and research activities in the Biosphere Reserves and the
protected areas that form them, in coordination with the corresponding Territorial Offices.
7. Participating in the processes for authorizing forestry management plans in the Biosphere
Reserves, at the sites allowed in accordance with current law.
8. Providing technical assistance to the MARENA Territorial Offices in the process of
formulating and monitoring the annual operating plans of the Biosphere Reserves and the
protected areas that form them, in coordination with the General Department of Protected Areas.
55Annex 31
9. Assisting the Territorial Offices of MARENA in such administrative processes as are
instituted by the commission for an offense or crime in a Biosphere Reserve.
10. Systematizing the information generated in the Biosphere Reserves to feed the SINAP
information database.
Art. 9. The MARENA Territorial Offices are responsible for:
1. Enforcing and ensuring compliance with environmental law in matters regarding protected
areas.
2. Proposing and participating in the preparation of policies, rules, and regulations to be applied
in the SINAP Protected Areas.
3. Directing, accrediting, and training the Park Ranger Corps, who shall watch over the
conservation of natural resources within the SINAP protected areas.
4. Approving the annual operating plans prepared by the co-managers of protected areas.
5. Participating in the process of approving management plans for the SINAP protected areas.
6. Monitoring the implementation of manage ment plans, annual operating plans, and co -
management agreements in the SINAP protected areas.
7. Authorizing and monitoring the infrastructure transportation and installation activities for the
storage of hydrocarbons destined for local consumption and production in the SINAP protected
areas, in coordination with DGAP and the Offices of the Biosphere Reserve, if applicable.
8. Monitoring the sustainable production and development activities in the SINAP protected
areas, in coordination with the General Department of Protected Areas and the Biosphere
Reserve Offices, if applicable.
9. Monitoring the scientific research activities for natural resources and biodiversity in the
SINAP protected areas, duly authorized by the competent authority.
10. Authorizing firewood exploitation activities in the SINAP protected areas, in accordance
with the procedures established by MARENA for that purpose.
11. Systematizing the information generated in the protected areas of their corresponding
territorial jurisdiction, to feed the SINAP information database.
12. Promoting the implementation of management mechanisms and sustainability criteria in the
buffer zones of the SINAP protected areas.
13. As established in the regulations established to this end, issuing a ministerial certification to
the owners of real property, who fall under any of the following categories:
56 Annex 31
13.1 Properties in protected areas used for research activities, protection, development, and
conservation of the environment and natural resources.
13.2 Properties used in their entirety or in part for Private Wildlife Reserves, provided that
investment projects are being performed such as reforestation, land conservation, wild species
conservation, security and control, among others.
13.3 Properties in protected areas and buffer zones where investment is being made in
conservation projects, duly supported by the General Department of Protected Areas.
CHAPTER IV
NATIONAL SYSTEMS OF PROTECTED AREAS SINAP
Section I
Declaration of Protected Areas
Art. 11. For the declaration of new protected areas, the following shall be performed
beforehand:
1. Identification and delimitation of the proposed area and its potential buffer zone:
1.1 Definition of the objectives of its creation.
1.2 Location and delimitation of the area and its potential buffer zone in coordination with
INETER with its limits expressed in rectangular coordinates.
1.3 Specification of the criteria used to define the limits of the proposed area.
1.4 Preliminary study of the landholdings with an indication of the following components:
1.4.1 Study of property registry of the properties located in the area whose protection is sought,
where applicable.
1.4.2 Certifications from the Public Property Registry, for the recorded re al properties located
within the area, for the purpose of considering the potential effect on property rights.
1.4.3 Identification of properties subject to being declared of public usefulness as established in
the laws that regulate the matter, given the importance and significance of the resources they
house, which shall limit to a large degree the possibilities of uses other than the preservation of
the resources.
1.4.4 Study and Analysis of the landholdings in the area of interest, which includes among other
things existing easements, history of the landholdings and properties in tenancy conflicts.
2. Technical studies of the proposed area that contain the following environmental,
socioeconomic, and cultural characteristics and conditions:
2.1 Ecological representativeness and viability.
2.2 Identification of the environmental goods and services.
2.3 Identification of genetic importance, endemicity, and threatened and endangered species.
57Annex 31
2.4 Identification of the principal environmental impacts that affect the area.
2.5 Identification of the principal socioeconomic, cultural, and historic activities in the proposed
area.
2.6 Identification of indigenous communities and areas that those communities cover.
2.7 Cultural traditions in the use of the natural resources.
3. Consideration of the management category.
Establish the compatibility of the demand for goods and services with respect to the objectives
that are established for the management categories. MARENA shall define through a ministerial
resolution the scheme for determining the management categories of the SINAP protected areas.
4. Calculate the budget line required to pay the affected property owners in cash and in advance,
as well as the pertinent information related to the size, q uality of the land, market value and
assessed value.
Art. 12. Prior to the formulation of a draft law to declare a new protected area, the interested
entities shall establish the respective technical coordination with MARENA, through the General
Department of Protected Areas, for compliance with the requirements established in Art. 11 of
this Regulation.
Section II
Protected Area Management Categories
Art. 13. The designation of the category of each Protected Area and the management thereof,
shall be in accordance with the following provisions:
1. BIOLOGICAL RESERVE
Definition.
Surfaces that have unaltered representative eco -regions and ecosystems, ethnic values and
species of importance, used principally for scientific research and/or ecological monitoring
activities.
Management Objectives:
1. Preserve the essential ecosystems, habitat, species, and ecological processes in the most
natural state possible.
2. Maintain the genetic and hydrological resources and processes in a dynamic and evolving
state.
3. Safeguard the structural features of the countryside.
Criteria for the designation of the category;
1. Have a large area, with significant diversity and biological wealth, well conserved so as to
guarantee the integrity of the eco- region and allow for the achievement of the management
objectives for which it is protected.
2. Be a representative sample of an eco -region or of plant formations as ecological units and be
exempt from direct human intervention to remain in that condition.
58 Annex 31
Directives for management:
1. Be managed by MARENA.
2. Allow, only within the limits of the reserve, the building of the infrastructure required for
protection, research, and monitoring.
3. Allow scientific research, activities, and monitoring in the area with the c orresponding
authorization from MARENA.
4. Limit access to the general public, except persons authorized by MARENA to perform
allowable actions in accordance with the Protected Area’s management plan.
5. Not allow the establishment of human settlements w ithin the limits of the protected area,
respecting indigenous rights.
6. Prohibit the introduction of exotic species within the limits of the reserve.
7. Prohibit, within the limits of the protected area, mining, oil exploration and exploitation,
forestry, fishing concessions, and others in conflict with the objectives of the area.
Art. 17. WILDLIFE REFUGE
Definition
A land and/or aquatic surface subject to active intervention to guarantee maintenance of the
habitat and/or to meet the needs of certain resident or migratory animal species or communities
that are of national or international importance, unique, threatened, and/or in danger of
extinction.
Management objectives:
1) Conserve the habitat and flora and fauna of national and/or international interest.
2) Improve knowledge through scientific research and the monitoring of the biological species in
the area as main activities related to the sustainable use of the resources.
3) Establish limited areas for educational purposes and for the public to appreciate the
characteristics of the habitat that is being protected and the wildlife management activities.
4) Manage the habitat for the protection of one or more resident or migratory species of national,
regional, or worldwide interest.
Criteria for the designation of the category:
1) They are areas that can perform an important function in the protection of nature and the
survival of species of aquatic or terrestrial fauna that are unique, threatened, or in danger of
extinction through the protection of their reproductive population, feeding or reproduction areas,
and critical habitats.
2) The size of the area will depend on the needs of the habitat of the species that must be
protected and can vary between small to very large.
Management directives:
1) Be managed by MARENA, though it may be assigned under co-management.
2) Allow research, monitoring, education, and environmental interpretation activities, ecotourism
and recreation in accordance with the regulations and procedures established by MARENA.
3) Allow for the sustainable exploitation and use of flora and fauna and their products only under
proven practices in the management of wild species in accordance the exploitation standards and
plans approved by MARENA in accordance with the laws in force.
59Annex 31
4) Allow the handling of species, animal or plant populations, and products when required to
ensure the ecological equilibrium.
5) Allow infrastructure in the area, upon approval from MARENA, in accordance with the
approved management and design plan.
6) Allow the planting of noninvasive trees in degraded areas, as established in the protected
area’s management plan and the law that governs the matter.
7) Allow for the performance of silvicultural, agricultural, wildlife breeding and livestock
practices in accordance with the management objects and the provisions established in the
corresponding management plan, as well as other activities that are implicit in sustainable
development.
8) Condition the use of the land on the regulations established in t he corresponding management
plan and other instruments that regulate the matter.
9) Prohibit mining, petroleum exploration and exploitation concessions, forestry, fishing
concessions, or others in conflict with the objectives of the area within the limits of the protected
areas.
Art. 18. GENETIC RESOURCE RESERVE
Definition
A land and/or aquatic surface that protects some species of wildlife because of the quality of
their genetic resources, which are of national interest and which might be used for geneti c
improvement programs for species of flora or fauna of economic or nutritional interest.
Management objectives:
1) Conserve wild genetic resources in order to obtain selected germoplasms.
2) Maintain the habitat in the conditions necessary to protect and restore particular species,
groups of species, and biotic communities with genetic resources of commercial or scientific
importance.
3) Facilitate scientific research and the biological monitoring of selected species, as principal
activities associated with the sustainable use of genetic resources.
Criteria for designation of the category:
1) The area must play an important role in the protection of wild aquatic or land species, that
have commercial or scientific importance due to their genetic quality.
2) The size of the area will depend on the needs of the habitats of the species that must be
protected.
Directives for management:
1) Be managed by MARENA, though it may be assigned under co-management.
2) Allow scientific research and monitoring in the A rea, as well as the exploitation of its
resources in accordance with the rules and procedures established by MARENA.
3) Allow for selective enrichment and exploitation practices for the species that it protects in
order to improve genetic quality; promote research, education, and environmental interpretation;,
the monitoring of the selected species and the sustainable use of the genetic resources for
socioeconomic purposes as established in the respective management plan.
4) Allow for manipulation of the genetic, biological, and habitat resources in accordance with the
provisions of the respective management plan.
60 Annex 31
5) Allow infrastructure in the area, upon approval from MARENA, in accordance with the
management plan for the area.
6) Condition the use of the land on the regulations established in the corresponding management
plan and other instruments that regulate the matter.
7) Prohibit the construction of infrastructure that fragments the habitats of the endemic species
[or] that alters the natural processesof those species.
8) Prohibit the introduction of exotic species within the limits of the reserve.
9) Prohibit mining, petroleum exploration and exploitation, forestry and fishing concessions, or
others in conflict with the objectives of the area within the limits of the protected areas.
Art. 19. NATURE RESERVE
Definition
A land surface and/or marine or lacustrine coastal surface conserved or influenced that contain
species of fauna and/or flora of interest that produce environmental benefits of national and/or
regional interest. Those termed Forestry Reserves shall be considered as Nature Reserves.
Management Objectives:
1) Conserve and restore the natural ecosystems and habitat of wildlife that is in the process of
reduction and degradation because of natural and human intervention in their ecological
environments.
2) Produce goods and services in a sustainable manner, when these may be: water, energy,
wood, or wildlife, including fishes or other marine products, and outdoor recreation.
Criteria for the designation of the category:
1) Be surface areas that allow for the production of goods and services and that have natural or
scenic traits of unique or exceptional national significance, such as: volcanoes, crater lagoons
with their hillsides, and other geological formations.
2) Contain ecological traits of interest for conservation of the wild flora and fauna of importance
for the regional economy and/or local subsistence.
3) Be surfaces that are protecting ecosystems of interest and that are function ing as biological
corridors, which are zones that produce water or surfaces that protect the high parts of basins to
prevent erosion.
Art. 20. PROTECTED LANDSCAPE OR SEASCAPE
Definition
Surface of land, coasts, and/or seas, as the case may be, where theinteractions of human beings
and nature over the years has produced an area with a character defined by cultural practices,
with important aesthetic, ecological, and/or cultural values, and which often house rich
biological diversity whose protection, maintenance, and evolution requires safeguarding of the
integrity of that traditional interaction.
Management Objectives:
1) Improve and protect the harmonious interaction between nature and culture, by protecting
landscapes and/or seascapes and maintaining the traditional practices for land use, building
methods, and manifestations of society and culture.
2) Conserve the diversity of the landscape, habitat, species, and associated ecosystems, and
61Annex 31
promote recreation and tourism.
3) Maintain the environmental quality of the landscape.
Criteria for designation of the category:
1) The area must have a landscape and/or seascape with coasts and islands, as the case may be,
of great scenic quality, with different habitats and associated species of flora and fauna, as well
as examples of land use practices and unique or traditional social organizations, which must give
witness to human settlements and customs, the means of subsistence and local beliefs.
Directives for management:
1) Be managed by MARENA, though it may be assigned under co-management.
2) Allow sustainable productive activities, research, restoration of landscapes, monitoring,
education, and environmental interpretation, sustainable tourism and recreation.
3) Allow the performance of economic activities that are in harmony with nature and the
preservation of the social and cultural web of the communities involved.
4) Allow for the performance of agricultural and livestock production activities under
silvopastoral and agroforestry systems, as established in the corresponding management plan for
the protected area or the annual operating plan.
5) Allow the manipulation of species or populations of animals and plants to ensure ecological
sustainability.
6) Allow the planting of noninvasive trees in degraded areas, as established in the protected
area’s management plan and the law that governs the matter.
7) Condition the use of the land on the regulations established in the corresponding management
plan and other instruments that govern the matter.
8) Allow the planting of noninvasive exotic species in degraded areas, provided that the genetic
integrity and survival of the native species existing in the protected area are not jeopardized, in
accordance with the feasibility of the technical proposal that is pre sented in advance by the
interested parties, as well as the provisions of the corresponding management plan and the
technical standards that are established by MARENA for these purposes.
9) Prohibit mining, petroleum exploration and exploitation concessions, forestry, fishing
concessions, or others in conflict with the objectives of the area within the limits of the protected
areas.
Art. 21. BIOSPHERE RESERVES
Definition
Biosphere Reserves are land and/or aquatic territories or a combination thereof, with significant
and diverse natural and cultural biodiversity assets of national and international importance, that
contain one or more protected areas, which when administered as a whole achieve sustainable
development. They are comprised of one or several core zones and a buffer zone and they are
created to promote and demonstrate a balanced relationship between human beings and the
biosphere.
The areas proposed as a Biosphere Reserve may also include territories that are legally declared
to be protected a reas in any category, and others not protected by law. The management of the
SINAP protected areas that comprise the Biosphere Reserve shall be in accordance with the
62 Annex 31
management category, the conservation objectives and the management directives of the
respective category of the protected areas in accordance with the provisions of the law, this
regulation, and the corresponding management plans.
Management Objectives:
1) Conserve units and/or samples representative of eco-regions and/or natural ecosystems and
cultural values through one or more protected areas and the interconnections thereof, which
contribute to the economic, social, ecological, and cultural feasibility and sustainability of the
region.
2) Promote regional development based on the sustaina ble production and use of natural
resources, diversifications, and application of low environmental impact technologies,
maintaining natural environments with high environmental service values and ecological
processes essential for sustainability, respecti ng the management of each protected area that
forms part of it.
The criteria for the designation of a Biosphere Reserve:
1) Contain a mosaic of ecological systems representative of important bio -geographical regions,
which includes a progressive series of forms of human intervention.
2) Maintain the importance of the conservation of biological diversity.
3) Offer possibilities to test and prove methods of sustainable development on a regional scale.
4) Apply organizational rules that enable the adequate and effective integration and participation
of key social sectors such as public institutions, local communities, indigenous ethnicities and
communities, private producers, universities, and NGO’s, among others, in the implementation
of the concept and functions of the Biosphere Reserves.
Zoning of Biosphere Reserves
1) Biosphere Reserves may have one or several core zones dedicated to long -term protection in
accordance with the conservation objectives thereof, which in turn may contain one, several, or
part of protected areas declared by Law.
2) Biosphere Reserves shall establish a buffer zone, where socioeconomic activities may be
performed with an eco- systemic focus, which ensure the conservation objectives of their core
zone(s). Protected areas located in the buffer zone of a Biosphere Reserve shall be administered
and managed in accordance with their respective management plans.
Functions of Biosphere Reserves
1) Conservation function: Contributing to the conservation of landscapes, ecosystems, speci es,
and genetic variation.
2) Development function: Fostering sustainable economic and human development, from the
sociocultural and ecological point of view.
3) Support function: Providing support to demonstration, education, environmental training,
research, and ongoing observation projects in relation to local, regional, and worldwide
conservation and sustainable development matters.
63Annex 31
Directives for the Management of Biosphere Reserves
1) Be administered by MARENA through the Offices of the Biosphere Reserves.
2) Guide the management of this type of reserve, through a zoning system that has room for
different degrees of intervention that allow for conservation, research, education, tourism, and
sustainable productive activities, respecting the provisions inherent to the categories of the
protected areas that comprise it.
3) Zoning based on biophysical evaluation and the identification and definition of core zones or
areas, interconnection areas, buffer zones, the socioeconomic development plans and the area of
interest for the regional economy.
4) Allow for scientific research and monitoring in the area in accordance with the rules of
MARENA.
5) Allow for the planting of noninvasive trees in degraded areas, as established in the
management plan for the area and the law that governs the matter.
6) The indigenous areas demarked and named by Law located in the protected areas that
comprise the Biosphere Reserves shall be managed under the joint management system with the
indigenous communities through the Office of Biosphere Reserves.
7) Allow, in the buffer zone of a Biosphere Reserve, agribusiness, agriculture and livestock,
forestry, fishing, and tourism production activities, in accordance with the laws in force.
CHAPTER V
MANAGEMENT OF PROTECTED AREAS
Art. 30. The SINAP Protected Areas shall have a management plan, which guides their short -,
medium- and long-term development, which shall be approved by MARENA upon consultation
with the municipalities, regional governments, private -property owners, local communities, and
indigenous communities living in the protected area.
If there is no approved management plan then there shall be an annual operating plan, which
guides the performance of management activities within the protected area and the preparation of
the respective management plan.
Art. 31. MARENA, through the management plans, shall define the limits of the protected areas
that have not been defined through its creation instrument. Likewise, in the implementation of
the corresponding management plans, land marking and signage activities shall be performed for
the physical delimitation of the area, in coordination with INETER.
In the case of protected areas that do not have approved management plans, MARENA shall
establish and make official a priori the limits of the respective protected area, through the
application of technical criteria for the preliminary delimitation of such areas.
Art. 32. MARENA shall support the consolidation of biological corridors to provide biological
interconnection areas between the protected areas, coordinating such action with the
municipalities, communities, and private-property owners.
64 Annex 31
Section I
Management Plan
Art. 33. The content of the Terms of Reference for the preparation of the management plans for
the SINAP protected areas, shall include the particularities of each protected area, as well as the
mechanisms that facilitate a participative process with local and regional authorities, private -
property owners, local communities and indigenous communities existing in the protected area.
Art. 34. The Terms of Reference for the preparation of management plans shall be issued by
MARENA within a maximum period of thirty (30) business days from the date on which the
request is received. The management plans for SINAP protected areas shall be prepared by a
multidisciplinary technical team.
Art. 35. MARENA, through the DGAP, may prepare an administrative file for each process to
prepare a Management Plan, which evidences the consultation, review, approval, and monitoring
process thereof, assigning it a permanent number and paginating it properly.
Art. 36. DGAP, within a period of 10 business days from receipt of the proposal for the
management plan, through an institutional technical team, shall review and verify that the
general content of the proposal agrees with the Terms of Reference. If it does not agree with the
Terms of Reference, it shall request that the interested party supplement the corresponding
information.
Art. 37. Once the management plan proposal is satisfactorily received, it shall have a period of
five (5) business days to send, officially, the Management Plan proposal to the corresponding
Municipal and Regional Council, if applicable, for them to issue their opinions within a period of
30 business days from receipt thereof.
Art. 38. If DGAP does not receive the opinions requested from the Municipal and/or regional
Council, if applicable, it shall continue with the approval process for the management plan
proposal.
Art. 39. Once the f oregoing criteria have been met, DGAP shall request from the Minister of
MARENA approval for the management plan, through a Ministerial Resolution which shall be
published in La Gaceta, the Official Gazette, for it to take effect.
Art. 40. The management plan shall be signed and sealed by the Director of MARENA’s
General Department of Protected Areas, on all its pages.
Art. 41. The management plans for the SINAP protected areas shall have five -year planning
periods, which may be revised when deemed necessary by the competent authority.
Art. 42. MARENA shall through a Ministerial Resolution approve a manual which shall
establish the content of the management plan for the protected areas.
65Annex 31
Section II
Buffer Zone
Art. 43. The management plan shall establish the delimitation of the buffer zone for each
protected area. In this zone social and inter-institutional cooperation processes will be fostered to
promote sustainable production models.
Art. 44. If a protected area has no management plan, MARENA shall preliminarily establish the
buffer zone for the protected area, in cooperation with social and inter -institutional sectors based
on management directives,
Art. 45. To delimit the buffer zone of each protected area, the technical criteria established i n
the manual for the methodology of the preparation of management plans prepared by MARENA
must be followed.
Section IV
Environmental Permits in Protected Areas
Art. 51. The works, activities, and projects to be performed in protected areas that require an
environmental permit, shall be subject to:
1) The procedures established in the Ministerial Resolutions that regulate the matter.
2) The management plans and/or annual operating plans for current protected areas.
3) The technical conservation policies for their natural resources, biodiversity, landscapes,
habitats, and ecosystems, which ensure continuity of the ecological and evolutionary functions
and processes in the protected areas.
4) The other sectoral regulations in effect which obligate the unde rtaking of an environmental
impact study (EIA).
Art. 52. The process for obtaining an environmental permit is applicable to new projects, which
includes: expansion, rehabilitation, or re -conversion within the protected areas, during the pre -
investment and planning phase, which because of their characteristics might cause damage to the
environment and natural resources, introduce changes to the landscape or directly or indirectly
affect the environmental quality, biological diversity, and cultural heritage.
Art. 53. The MARENA Territorial Offices shall be responsible for the monitoring and control
of the environmental permits applied in SINAP.
Section V
Authorizations for Activities in Protected Areas
Art. 54. All activities using or exploiting natura l resources and producing goods and services in
Protected Areas require authorization from MARENA, in order to ensure that they are performed
in accordance with the management plan, annual operating plan, and management objectives and
directives for the area.
66 Annex 31
Art. 55. The authorization cited in the prior article shall be granted by the Territorial Delegate
of MARENA in coordination with the General Department of Protected Areas, upon completion
of the requirements and procedures established in the rules t hat regulate the matter. The
respective authorization shall establish the conditions and type of charges for performing the
activity.
Art. 56. MARENA shall establish through Ministerial Resolutions the technical criteria and
administrative procedures for the authorization of sustainable use and exploitation activities for
natural resources in the SINAP protected areas.
CHAPTER X
VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES
Section I
Violations
Art. 77. All actions or omissions that violate the provisions of this Regulation shall be deemed a
violation and shall be penalized administratively in accordance with the procedure established in
the General Environment and Natural Resources Act, Law No. 217, Executive Branch
Organization, Jurisdiction, and Procedures Act, Law No. 290, and the respective Regulations
thereof, without prejudice to the crimes and violations established in the Criminal Code and
other laws.
Art. 78. MARENA, as a regulatory, standards, and administrative agency for the environmental
management of the p rotected areas, shall be the authority competent to take cognizance of,
decide, and apply the corresponding administrative penalties.
Art. 79. Violations of this Resolution are classified as minor, serious, and very serious.
Art. 80. The following constitute minor violations:
1. Violating the provisions established in the management directives and management plan for
the protected areas in accordance with this regulation without causing damage to the
environment and to natural resources.
2. Cutting a nd/or extracting from the protected area without due authorization, wild flora and
fauna products and/or sub-products, for household purposes.
3. Denying or preventing inspections by duly identified MARENA officials within the protected
area under its jurisdiction.
4. Conducting grazing activities in areas where this activity is restricted as established in the
management plan.
5. Holding sports fishing events and competitions without authorization.
6. Performing within the protected area tourism servic e activities for commercial purposes
without the corresponding authorization.
7. Performing research and monitoring activities in the protected area without authorization.
8. Entering into the protected area with weapons and hunting gear.
67Annex 31
Art. 81. the following constitute serious violations:
1. Cutting and/or extracting from the protected area without authorization, wild flora and fauna
products and/or sub-products for commercial purposes.
2. Depositing nontoxic solid waste and contaminants on the l and or in the water within the
protected areas.
3. Performing wild animal hunting activities within the limits of the protected area.
4. Performing fishing activities without authorization for commercial purposes.
5. Firing weapons within the protected areas.
6. Destroying signs and landmarks in the protected area.
7. Developing infrastructure without the corresponding environmental permit within the SINAP
protected areas.
8. The use of explosives, poisonous substances, pesticides, or other chemical products within the
limits of the SINAP protected areas.
9. Presenting completely or partially false data to the competent authorities.
10. Recidivism of minor violations.
Art. 82. The following constitute very serious violations:
1. Recidivism in the violation of the provisions established in the management directives and the
management plans of the protected areas, producing changes and damage to the environment and
to natural resources.
2. Burning without authorization.
3. Causing fires in protect ed areas as a result of a negligent situation attributable to a natural or
legal person authorized to perform controlled burnings.
4. Hunting, fishing, or capturing species, products or sub-products of threatened wild animals or
those in danger of extinction.
5. Not respecting closed seasons for established flora and fauna.
6. Performing activities replacing natural forest with forest plantings, grazing land, or other uses
in the SINAP protected areas.
7. Collecting protected species of flora, products, and sub-products without the corresponding
permit.
8. Depositing or discharging, within the limits of the protected areas, hydrocarbons or oily
mixtures and toxic substances, as well as contaminated water and solid waste.
9. Extracting genetic material from the SINAP protected areas without the corresponding
authorization.
10. Performing unauthorized activities which cause or may cause effective and/or irreversible
damage to the protected areas
11. Recidivism of serious violations.
MARENA though minis terial resolution shall establish the criteria that will determine the
volumes and quantities of natural resources from the protected areas to be used for household
purposes and the volumes and quantities to be used for commercial purposes, as established in
the management categories of the SINAP protected areas.
68 Annex 31
Section II
Penalties
Art. 83. Minor violations shall be punished with a warning that MARENA shall make through
notification, establishing the measures and the time for correcting the damage and factors related
to the violation that damaged the environment. The seizure of products and/or sub-products
extracted illegally from the protected area is also possible.
Art. 84. Serious violations shall be punished by fines equivalent to twice the commer cial value
of the product or sub-product extracted or the damage caused, plus the cost of curing the damage
caused. Jointly with the fine, the seizure of the products and/or sub-products extracted illegally,
as well as the seizure of the means and instruments used to commit the violation, shall be
applicable.
Art. 85. Very serious violations shall be punished with fines equivalent to four times the
commercial value of the product or sub-product extracted or the damage caused, plus the cost of
curing the damage caused, as well as the temporary suspension or permanent cancellation of the
permits, authorizations, licenses, and/or any other type of right in the Protected Area. Jointly
with the fine the seizure of the products and/or sub-products extracted illegally and the seizure of
the means and instrument used in the commission of the violation, shall be applied.
Through a Ministerial Resolution, MARENA shall establish the mechanism for establishing the
value of the damage caused in the SINAP protected areas.
6970 Annex 32
Nicaraguan Law No. 647
3 April 2008
7172 Annex 32
LA GACETA
OFFICIAL GAZETTE
Telephone: 228-3791 /222-7344
Print Run: 850 Copies Price C$ 45.00
32 Pages Córdobas Oro
YEAR CXII Managua, Thursday April 3, 2008 No. 62
[…]
NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF THE
REPUBLIC OF NICARAGUA
LAW No. 647
[…]
AMENDMENT AND ADDITIONS ACT TO LAW No. 217, “GENERAL
ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES ACT,”
Article 1 . The objective of this Act is to amend and add to Law No. 217, the “General
Environmental and Natural Resources Act,” approved by the National Assembly on March 27,
1996 and published inLa Gaceta, Official Gazette No. 105 of June 6 of the same year, in
accordance with the provisions established herein.
Art. 2. An addition is made to Art. 4 of Law 217, number 8), which shall read thus:
“8) The principle of precaution shall prevail over any other in the public and private management
of the environment. The State shall take preventive measures in case of doubt on the negative
environmental impact or consequences of any action or omission, even if there is nficcienti
evidence of the damage.”
[…]
Art. 7. Art. 17 of Law No. 217 is amended, which shall read thus:
“Art. 17. The National System of Protected Areas (SINAP) is created, which includes all of the
protected areas declared to date and those that will be declared in the future. Private Wildlife
Reserves, as well as the legal, environmental management, and administrative instruments
required for the implementation thereof, are incorporated into this system, along with their
particular regulations.
Protection of the natural resources of the country is a national security concern, as well as the
most important responsibility and priority of the State, and within that spirit a full and complete
73Annex 32
prohibition is established for forestry resources in the protected areas.
Art. 8. Two numbers are added to Art. 18 of Law No. 217, which shall read thus:
“7) Promote sustainable local development; foster the implementation of clean processes and
technologies for the improvement and rational and sustainable exploitation of natural
ecosystems.
8) Systematically strengthen the environmental services provided by the protected areas for the
benefit of the inhabitants in the area, the national economy, and sustainable development.”
Art. 9. Art. 21 of Law No. 217 is amended, which shall read thus:
“Art. 21. All of the activities that are performed in protected areas must be performed in
accordance with the provisions of the respective Management Plan approved by the Ministry of
the Environment and Natural Resources (MARENA), which shall be in accordance with the
categories that are established for each area. In the case of protected areas that do not have a
management plan, the activities shall be performed in accordance with the provisions of an
Annual Operating Plan approved b y MARENA, which shall be discussed with the institutions
that have an effect on the area, including the respective Municipal Governments, aimed at
creating the conditions for the preparation of the respective management plan within a period of
no more than two years. Both in the achievement of the protection objectives and in management
and supervision, the participation of the community shall be guaranteed.”
Art. 10. Art. 22 of Law No. 217 is amended, which shall read thus:
“Art. 22. The Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources shall be the institution with
jurisdiction for the administration, standardization, authorization of activities, supervision,
monitoring, and regulation of the protected areas that form part of SINAP. It may likewise grant
the management of the protected areas, under the status of co- management, in accordance with
the criteria, requirements, and administrative procedure established to that end.”
Art. 11. Art. 24 of Law No. 217 is amended, which shall read thus:
“Art. 24. A Buffer Zone shall be established bordering or surrounding each Protected Area, for
which the following shall be adhered to:
1. In the case of a declaration of new protected areas, the buffer zone shall be established by
the Law creating such.
2. When t here are already declared protected areas, that do not have buffer zones, the
provisions of the approved Management Plan or that which is approved, in accordance with the
provisions of Art. 8 of this Act, shall be adhered to.
For effective control, monitoring, and follow -up that guarantees sustainable development in the
buffer zones, the instruments that are necessary shall be crated with the participation of and in
74 Annex 32
coordination with the institutions and/or participants who have an effect on the zone.
In the buffer zones of the Bosawas Biosphere Reserve, the Protected Area of the Southeast, and
the Cerro Wawashang Nature Reserve, as well as the future ones that are granted, an external
perimeter area of ten kilometers is established measured from the borde r of the protected area
that constitutes it, in which only forestry exploitation for domestic noncommercial purposes and
for exclusive use in the area shall be allowed.”
Art. 12. The name of SECTION IV of CHAPTER II, “ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
PERMITS AND EVALUATION” of Law No. 217 shall be amended, as well as Articles 25, 26,
and 27, which shall read thus:
“SECTION IV
THE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION SYSTEM
Art. 25. The Environmental Evaluation System shall be administered by the Ministry of the
Environment and Natural Resources in coordination with the corresponding institutions.
In the case of the Autonomous Regions, the Environmental Evaluation System shall be
administered by the respective Regional Council in coordination with MARENA, for the purpose
of being involved in the decision-making process, in the control and follow -up of the provisions
of the Environmental permits granted by the respective Regional Council.
Art. 26. The Municipal and Sectoral Investment and Development Plans and Programs shall be
obligated to perform a Strategic Environmental Evaluation (EAE), for which MARENA shall
establish the criteria, methodologies, requirements, and administrative procedure to follow.
Art. 27. The projects, works, industries, or any other activity, whether public or private,
domestic or foreign investment, or during the pre -investment, execution, expansion,
rehabilitation, or reconversion phase which because of the characteristics thereof can cause
damage to the environment or to natural resources, in accordance with the specific list of the
categories of the works or projects which are established in the respective Regulation, shall
obtain an Environmental Permit or Environmental Authorization prior to the performance
thereof. All tourism or urban development usage projects in coastal regions shall have an
Environmental Impact Study to obtain the corresponding permit.
The works or projects that require an Environmental Permit based on the specific list, shall first
perform an Environmental Impact Study. MARENA and the Autonomous Regional Councils are
obligated to discuss the studies with the competent sectoral bodies as well as with the respective
Municipal governments. If an Environmental Authorization is required, the work, industry, or
project shall be subjected to an Environmental Evaluation, under penalty of Law.
The fragmentation of works or projects to avoid the responsibility of all the aspects of the Study
is prohibited. The proponent shall present the Full Project Investment Master Plan to MARENA.
Obtaining the land usage and building permits for any type of horizontal and/or vertical works or
75Annex 32
infrastructure, necessarily require having the corresponding Environmental Permit in advance,
issued by MARENA in accordance with the provisions of the Strategic Evaluation System.”
Art. 13. Three new articles are added to SECTION IV, THE ENVIRONMENTAL
EVALUATION SYSTEM, which shall read thus:
“Art. 31. The activities that are not in the standard list of works or projects cited in the preceding
article, shall b e obligated, to request the corresponding Environmental Permit from the
Municipality prior to execution thereof, after completing the environmental form established by
MARENA. The Autonomous Regional Councils and the Municipal Governments shall evaluate
the request to approve or deny such permit.
Art. 32. All those natural or legal persons who do not comply with the requirements, provisions,
or controls that are set, shall be sanctioned by MARENA, without prejudice to such civil or
criminal actions as may be taken against them in accordance with current law.
Art. 33. The Environmental Bond is established as a financial guaranty, in favor of the State of
Nicaragua, taken out by all natural or legal persons who in virtue of performing an activity,
work, or project, are obligated to have an Environmental Permit. The purpose thereof is to
guarantee compliance with the conditions established in the Environmental Permit and
compensation of the costs for such environmental damage as is caused.”
Art. 14. The full force and effect of Arts. 44 and 34 of Law No. 217, which were repealed by
Law No. 257, “Tax and Commercial Justice Act,” approved by the National Assembly on May
15, [truncated] and published in La Gaceta , Official Gazette No. 106 of June 6, [truncated], is
reestablished, becoming, respectively, Articles 47 and 48. Art. 48, which has been reestablished,
is amended, and shall read thus:
“Art. 48. Equipment and machinery whose use is identified as clean technology shall be exempt
from import duties, upon ce rtification from the Ministry of the Environment and Natural
Resources.”
76 Annex 33
MARENA Administrative Resolution No. 038-2008
22 December 2008
7778 Annex 33
[logo]
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ADMINISTRATIVE RESOLUTION No. 038-2008
Following examination of the application for an Environmental Permit dated the 25 thday of
January two thousand six, filed by the Empresa Portuaria Nacional company (EPN), for
execution of the “Improvement of Navigat ion on the San Juan de Nicaragua River” project,
the record for which is identified as Record Number 037- 2006, before the Ministry of the
Environment and Natural Resources, Directorate General of Environmental Quality.
The project consists of the design a nd construction of a navigation channel by means of the
dredging of 41,963.57 linear meters of the section extending from the site known as Punta
Chingo Petaca to the mouth of the San Juan de Nicaragua River, and the construction of an
access canal permitt ing the movement of dredge from the Caribbean Sea to the San Juan de
Nicaragua River, which shall have a length of 2,000 meters. The project is located in the
jurisdiction of San Juan de Nicaragua Municipality, Río San Juan Department, within the
boundaries of the San Juan de Nicaragua River Wildlife Refuge.
In response to this application, notices were sent to the agencies involved for the creation of the
inter-institutional group responsible for evaluating the project and issuing a technical
determination therein, in accordance with the established procedures, in which representatives of
the Office of Executive Secretary of the Southeast Nicaragua Biosphere Reserve, the Nicaraguan
Institute of Territorial Studies (INETER), the Directorate General of Water Transport of the
Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure (DGTA – MTI), and the MARENA San Juan River
Territorial Delegation participated, with coordination by the MARENA Directorate General of
Environmental Quality.
Three technical inspections were performed in the area of the proposed project, with the
participation of the inter-institutional group and the project’s representatives.
The Terms of Reference for the formulation of the Environmental Impact Study (EIS ) were
drawn up, the first prelimin ary and detailed technical reviews of the EIS and the Environmental
Impact Document (EID) were carried out, and the required meetings with the inter -institutional
team and the project’s representatives were held to clarify technical aspects reflected in th e
Terms of Reference, as well as in the period of detailed technical review of the Environmental
Impact Study and the review of Addendum I.
The Public Comment process was conducted during the period from Wednesday 9 August to
Tuesday 15 August 2006, and comments and remarks were received from five individuals, as
well as from the Director of the Office of Executive Secretary of the Southeast Nicaragua
Biosphere Reserve and the Municipal Mayor of San Juan de Nicaragua. All the comments were
analyzed and considered in the Administrative Resolution by the
[logo] Km 12 ½ Carretera Panamericana
Facing Corporación de Zonas Francas
Apartado Postal (PO Box) 5123, Managua, Nicaragua
Tel: (505) 263- 2620Fax: (505) 263-2620
[seal] Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources
MARENA – Directorate General of Environmental Quality
[Illegible Signature] [Handwritten: Received 9 July 2009]
79Annex 33
[logo]
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Inter-institutional team that issued a determination on the Environmental Impact Study submitted
by the Proponent.
In response to the substitution of authorities at the EPN following the election of two thousand
six, the request for complementary information by the institutional evaluation team, to correct
certain weaknesses found in the EI S, was sent to the MARENA by the EPN’s new authorities.
All the requests were fulfilled and the procedure for the co rresponding environmental impact
permit was resumed.
WHEREAS
I
The Political Constitution of Nicaragua prescribes the right of all Nicaraguans to live in a
healthful environment, and the Nicaraguan State is responsible for ensuring this right through the
implementation and use of environmental management arrangements and instruments. The
Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources is the agency charged with formulating,
proposing, and directing the national environmental policies.
II
Law 217, General Environment and Natural Resources Act, provides as follows in its Article 4,
part 3: “The criterion of prevention shall prevail over any other in the public and private
management of the environment. The absence of absolute scientific certainty cannot be invoked
as a reason for not taking preventive measures in all activities which have an impact on the
environment.” Additionaly, Article 4, part 5, provides that: “Property rights have a social and
environmental function which limits and conditions their absolute, abusive, and arbitrary
exercise, in conformity with the provisions of this act and the special environmental laws in
force.”
III
The Regulations on Protected Areas of Nicaragua (Decree No. 01 -2007) provide in their Article
51 “that the works, activities, and projects to be carried out in the protected areas which require
environmental permits must be in accordance with the procedures prescribed for them, the
approved Management Plans, and the technical criteria for conservation of their natural
resources biodiversity, landscapes, habitats, and ecosystems so as to ensure the continuity of the
ecological and evolutionary functions and processes in the protected areas.”
IV
The provisions of Law 585, Prohibition of Cutting, Utilization, and Marketin g of Forestry
Resources Act, published in Official Daily -Gazette No. 120 on the twenty first day of June, two
thousand six, and the provisions of Law 620, General National Waters Act, and its Regulations,
[logo] Km 12 ½ Carretera Panamericana
Facing Corporación de Zonas Francas
Apartado Postal (PO Box) 5123, Managua, Nicaragua
Tel: (505) 263- 2620Fax: (505) 263-2620
[seal] Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources
MARENA – Directorate General of Environmental Quality
80 Annex 33
[logo]
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
published in Official Daily-Gazette No. 169 of the fourth day of September, two thousand seven,
prescribe measures, restrictions, and prohibitions in the field for each legal instrument, which
cannot be reflected in the provisions of this Environmental Permit because they are Laws which
entered into force subsequent to the application, in fulfillment of the principle prescribed in
Article 38 of the Political Constitution of Nicaragua, whereby “The Law has no retroactive effect
….”
V
The San Juan River is the only communication route at the disposal of San Juan de Nicaragua
Municipality, wherefore the improvement of that river’s navigability is of vital importance to
satisfy the basic needs of said municipality’s inhabitants.
VI
The current degree of sedimentation in the last section of the San Juan River , from Punta Chigo
Petaca to the San Juan River’s mouth, poses serious problems for navigation, which impedes the
entire San Juan de Nicaragua Municipality’s full participation in the national life, impairing the
entire population’s access to basic public services and the enjoyment of their rights as
Nicaraguan citizens which are conferred on them by the Political Constitution of Nicaragua.
VII
The activities of the “Improvement of Navigation on the San Juan de Nicaragua River”
Project may cause potentially significant environmental impacts. According, in the framework of
Decree 45-94, Regulations for Environmental Permits and Environmental Impact Assessments,
Article 5, part j, it is mandatory to have an Environmental Permit prior to the project’s executio n,
which requires the performance of an Environmental Impact Study by the Empresa Portuaria
Nacional (EPN) company.
VIII
The procedures prescribed in the currently applicable legal framework have been fulfilled in the
procedure carried out in response to the application for an Environmental Permit, and the inter -
institutional technical team has determined that the project is environmentally viable, provided
the proponent strictly complies in its entirety with all the environmental measures and actions
stipulated in the Environmental Impact Study , its corresponding Environmental Management
Program, and the Addendum, which include all the preventive and mitigating actions prescribed
for handling of the material extracted from the river bed and its disposal at the final dumping
sites identified in the environmental impact study, as well as the final disposition of the domestic
effluents and handling of the project’s solid wastes.
[logo] Km 12 ½ Carretera Panamericana
Facing Corporación de Zonas Francas
Apartado Postal (PO Box) 5123, Managua, Nicaragua
Tel: (505) 263- 2620Fax: (505) 263-2620
[seal] Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources
MARENA – Directorate General of Environmental Quality
81Annex 33
[logo]
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
NOW, THEREFORE
The Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources, Directora te General of Environmental
Quality, acting in the use of the powers conferred on it by the Regulations of Law 290, Executive
Branch Organization, Competence, and Procedures Act, Decree 25-2006, Article 294, Law 217,
Article 27 of the General Environment a nd Natural Resources Act, and Articles 28 and 29 of
Decree 45-94, Regulations on Environmental Permits and Environmental Impact Assessments,
as well as on the basis of the technical criteria and considerations adopted by the inter -
institutional technical team which issued the determination on the Environmental Impact Study.
RESOLVES
First: To grant an Environmental Permit to the Empresa Portuaria Nacional (EPN) company
for execution of the “Improvement of Navigation on the San Juan River of Nicaragua.”
Second: For the intents and purposes of this environmental permit, the Empresa Portuaria
Nacional (EPN) company shall henceforth be referred to as the Proponent.
Third: Based on the criteria and recommendations of the inter-institutional technical team which
evaluated the Environmental Impact Study, and in compliance with the legal and environmental
provisions currently in force, the Directorate General of Environmental Quality of the MARENA
adopts the following provisions, which are mandatory and require strict compliance:
1) This Environmental Permit is issued exclusively for improvement of the navigation route
to permit the communities in the south- eastern corner of the national territory to be in
contact by river with the rest of the country. The naviga tion channel shall have the
following dimensions: in its cross -section it shall be 20 meters wide at the bottom, 30
meters wide at the surface, and with a minimum depth of 2 meters in the dry season,
throughout a section 41,963.57 meters in length which runs from the site known as Punta
Chingo Petaca to the [mouth] of the San Juan River, plus the construction of an access
channel to carry the equipment required for the clean -up operation from the Caribbean
Sea to the Estuary of the San Juan de Nicaragua Riv er, which shall have a cross -section
40 meters wide at the bottom, 60 meters wide at the surface, and with a minimum depth
of 6 meters, along a total length of 2,000 meters.
2) The material extracted from the river bed, calculated at (1,693,787 m ) shall be deposited
at the sites previously identified in the Environmental Impact Study , located on the left
bank of the San Juan River along the length of the section where the project’s activities
will be conducted. In consideration of the conditions in the ar ea and the project’s
importance at the national level, the MARENA accepts the use of the sites proposed in
[logo] Km 12 ½ Carretera Panamericana
Facing Corporación de Zonas Francas
Apartado Postal (PO Box) 5123, Managua, Nicaragua
Tel: (505) 263- 2620Fax: (505) 263-2620
[seal] Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources
MARENA – Directorate General of Environmental Quality
82 Annex 33
[logo]
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
the Environmental Impact Study as the only alternative for dumping of the extracted
material. The authorized sites, by UTM coordinates, are as follows:
No. NAMES OF THE UTM COORDINATES AREA VOLUM
DUMPING SITES NORTH EAST (MZ) E
M 3
0 Public property* 1 211 244 202 220 00
1 Public property 1 209 201 206 250 2.25 60,704
2 Public property 1 207 483 207 205 00 98,273
3 Public property 1 207 319 207 736 2.08 14,579
4 Juan Popa 1 206 540 207 309 15.73 110,532
5 Public property 1 205 357 207 314 5.61 39,404
6 Chepe Nuevo 1 204 649 208 162 1.19 16,744
7 Daniel Reyes 1 203 662 208 278 13.39 188,184
8 Noel Castillano 1 202 463 207 727 2.13 29,958
9 Calixto 1 200 692 207 477 14.65 102,941
10 José Gómez 1 199 981 207 762 4.73 66,436
11 José Gómez 1 198 453 208 250 27.41 192,571
12 Alejandro Reyes 1 197 832 208 809 19.22 135,019
Aragón
13 Socorro López S. 1 196 615 208 689 9.01 63,283
14 Darío Sánchez (El 1 194 306 205 891 2.40 33,700
Jobo)
14-A Isla Salomón 1 193 874 205 266 2.12 21,226
14-B Isla Salomón 1 194 151 204 172 2.12 21,226
15 Ricardo Salinas 1 194 453 203 651 1.86 26,090
16 Silvio Reyes 1 193 900 202 322 25.16
[logo] Km 12 ½ Carretera Panamericana
Facing Corporación de Zonas Francas
Apartado Postal (PO Box) 5123, Managua, Nicaragua
Tel: (505) 263- 26Fax: (505) 263-2620
[seal] Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources
MARENA – Directorate General of Environmental Quality
83Annex 33
[logo]
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
17 Rubén Reyes 1 193 247 200 549 13.73 363,801
18 Felipe Espinoza 1 193 136 199 890 5.34 75,074
19 Gregorio Chamorro 1 192 607 198 443 0.52 7,334
20 San Juan River Delta 1 192 386 197 532 1.19 2,050
21 Public property 1 192 429 197 088 1.30 --
22 Public property 1 192 535 196 203 0.39 5,544
23 Public property 1 191 939 194 134 1.20 16,874
24 Public property 1 189 857 189 947 6.65 46,742
3) It is necessary to protect and preserve the riverbank vegetation at all the sites used as
dumps for extracted materials. At th e sites where there is no riverbank vegetation or
where this type of vegetation may be adversely affected by the activities to be conducted,
the project’s executor is obligated to restore it in accordance with a reforestation plan,
making use of native spe cies. No exotic species may be introduced for recovery of the
vegetable cover in the ecosystem affected by the project’s activities. The protective
barriers on the left bank of the San Juan River must include the construction of a structure
that does not permit erosion or overflowing of the banks when the river rises; the
structures must be built prior to or concurrently with the process of extraction of the
sediment material from the river bed, according to the construction specifications shown
in the environmental impact study.
4) Thirty (30) days before commencing activities in the project, the Proponent must mark all
the sites that have been identified as material dumps in order to facilitate their
localization, identification, and management. Pennants, stakes, or other kinds of marking
devices which are easily identifiable from a distance may be used for this purpose. The
number or name given to the dump site, the area to be used, and the volume of material to
be dumped must appear on the markers.
5) Before material begins to be dumped in the spaces selected as dumping sites, each of said
sites must first be cleared of all vegetation and the barriers , which will ensure the
material’s confinement, must be built, to avoid the material’s return to the rive r bed.
Material may not be dumped on existing vegetation at the dump site. At no time may
material be dumped at a distance of less than 50 meters from the river bank, except at
those sites whose characteristics so permit, but this must be compensated for w ith the
conservation works to be built.
6) The wood resulting from the removal of vegetation at each of the dumping sites must be
offered to the nearby inhabitants for their use, for either energy or lumbering purposes.
The remains of plants which cannot be utilized shall be used in environmental recovery
[logo] Km 12 ½ Carretera Panamericana
Facing Corporación de Zonas Francas
Apartado Postal (PO Box) 5123, Managua, Nicaragua
Tel: (505) 263- 262Fax: (505) 263-2620
[seal] Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources
MARENA – Directorate General of Environmental Quality
84 Annex 33
[logo]
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
work in the affected spaced. These vegetable remains may not be buried under the
extracted material. The MARENA prohibits the burning of any residues of cut vegetation.
The Proponent must make a record of the origin and volume of the vegetation removed
(wood to be utilized), as well as a classification and the subsequent uses made thereof.
7) Tree remnants which are extracted from the river bed, such as trunks and branches, must
be used in the construction of barriers to confine the dumped dredged material or to
stabilize the river banks.
8) The Proponent must make certain that the fuel required for the dredging is supplied by
personnel trained for said operation, to prevent leaks or spills of substances of this kind
into the San Juan River.
9) The Proponent must ensure the permanent existence of floating barriers and absorbent
material in the vessel to be used for the cleaning process in the river, so as to respond to,
and quickly contain, any quantity o f hydrocarbons which might be generated by an
accidental leak or spill of substances of this kind, and to immediately extract from the
water any hydrocarbon residues that might be recovered, so as to prevent the propagation
of pollution in the event of an emergency.
10)The equipment and machinery to be used to clean the river must carry the containers and
recipients required to store the residues generated in the maintenance work on its motors
and equipment. Residues must be handled as prescribed in the i nternational maritime
navigation agreements. The MARENA does not permit residues of this kind to be
abandoned at any of the river ports on the San Juan River.
11)The Proponent must provide for environmental supervision of the project throughout its
period of execution, and to that end it must retain the services of a professional who has
the necessary qualifications and experience, who shall perform the function of permanent
environmental manager in the area and in all project activities. The Proponent must
inform the MARENA of the retained professional’s name prior to the project’s execution;
he shall receive instructions on the environmental aspects to be supervised and the reports
which must be submitted pursuant to this Resolution’s provisions, to ensure
environmental compliance and control in view of the area’s characteristics. The
MARENA Delegation at Río San Juan shall delegate an environmental inspector, who
shall provide ongoing monitoring throughout the performance of the activities, and his
expenses shall be borne by the project’s Proponent.
12)The Proponent must ensure that the company and/or personnel hired to perform the river
clean-up work respect and protect the local flora and fauna, as well as the rest of the
environmental factors presentin the area where the project’s activities are conducted. The
[logo] Km 12 ½ Carretera Panamericana
Facing Corporación de Zonas Francas
Apartado Postal (PO Box) 5123, Managua, Nicaragua
Tel: (505) 263- 2620 Fax: (505) 263-2620
[seal] Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources
MARENA – Directorate General of Environmental Quality
85Annex 33
[logo]
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
MARENA prohibits hunting, capture, and utilization of all kinds of fauna and flora
species present in the area, in accordance with the provisions of the currently applicable
legislation and the San Juan River of Nicaragua Wildlife Refuge Management Plan.
13)The inhabitants who live in places close to the dumping sites for dredged material must
be informed of the commencement of operations near their homes at least thirty (30)
business days in advance. The Proponent must guarantee the restrictions on movement at
the site where the dredged material will be dumped, as well as the necessary security.
14)In the event work is done at night, and at the sites where the machinery and equipment
must remain during the night, it is necessary to ensure lighted signs of the area, to prevent
accidents to persons and public and private vessels.
15)The material extracted from the river bed must be dumped at the selected sites in laminar
form over a relatively flat surface no more than 1.1 meters higher than the maximum
altitude of the land. All the material must be confined in order to prevent its return to the
riverbed, as prescribed in the Environmental Impact Study.
16)Dumping of material generated by the clean-up on the river bank and nearby areas
between the outlet of Caño Sucio and Boca de San Juanillo is to be avoided, so as to
prevent alterations in the circulation of waters in view of the very gentle slope in that
natural drainage area for the Ebo, L a Barca, and Sillico lagoons, in consideration of the
importance of the area’s primary production and to support the potential of its fishing
resources, with special protection for the swamp and mangrove habitats in the area of the
San Juan River’s mouth, which forms the tideland facing the sea, in accordance with the
fishing biology study’s findings.
17)When the dumping of material extracted from the river bed is completed at each dump, it
is necessary to immediately ensure the conditions for the natural regeneration,
reforestation, and restoration of the vegetation at the affected site. The Proponent must
coordinate with the MARENA Delegation at Río San Juan and the San Juan de Nicaragua
Municipal Government in regard to the measures taken for the protection and vigilance of
these spaces, so as to prevent their being used for the construction of houses.
18)The MARENA may authorize the dumping of extracted material at places where the
population needs it, and especially the populating living in hamlets a long the bank of the
San Juan de Nicaragua River, provided the technical assessment so permits, with the aim
of elevating the land and reducing the risk of flooding of said inhabited areas. The
measures for protection of the population must be coordinated between the Proponent,
the Municipal Government of San Juan de Nicaragua, and the local village leaders.
[logo] Km 12 ½ Carretera Panamericana
Facing Corporación de Zonas Francas
Apartado Postal (PO Box) 5123, Managua, Nicaragua
Tel: (505) 263- 2620Fax: (505) 263-2620
[seal] Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources
MARENA – Directorate General of Environmental Quality
86 Annex 33
[logo]
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
19)Since the use of the material extracted from the San Juan River in useful works for the
population is a good environmental practice, the MARENA re commends coordination of
efforts and resources between the Proponent and the government agency responsible for
the construction of the San Juan de Nicaragua airstrip, for the formation of a material
bank to be used in the construction of said airstrip, houses, streets, and sidewalks in the
municipality, with a view to reducing the volumes of material to be dumped in the most
vulnerable areas of wetlands.
20)The Proponent must allocate the human, technical, economic, and material resources
needed to fulfil l its undertakings for protection of the environment and the natural
resources of the area, arising from this Administrative Resolution and the provisions of
the Environmental Management Program, a copy of which is attached to this
Environmental Permit.
21)Any accident or event which occurs and threatens to adversely affect the environment
and natural resources in the area, even when it has been brought under control, must be
immediately reported by the Proponent to the representatives of the following author ities,
in verbal form (first notification) and in writing, with the details of the incident and the
actions taken to control it:
• The MARENA Departmental Delegation at Río San Juan.
• The Office of the Executive Secretary of the Southeast Nicaragua Biosphere
Reserve.
• The Directorate General of Environmental Quality at the MARENA Central
Headquarters.
• The Directorate General of Natural Patrimony at the MARENA Central
Headquarters.
• The Municipal Government of San Juan de Nicaragua.
• The Directorate General of Water Transport in the MTI.
22)The MARENA prohibits the construction of any temporary or permanent buildings on
“dry land up to 30 meters behind the line of maximum marks or that of the permanent
course of rivers and lakes …,” pursuant to Article 72 of Law 217, General Environment
and Natural Resources Act.
23)The MARENA Central Headquarters or the MARENA Territorial Delegation at Río San
Juan shall inspect the area of the project when they see fit, with or without prior notice.
24)In the event of any n oncompliance or the violation of any of the foregoing clauses, the
Proponent shall incur warnings, fines, temporary suspension, or cancellation of the
[logo] Km 12 ½ Carretera Panamericana
Facing Corporación de Zonas Francas
Apartado Postal (PO Box) 5123, Managua, Nicaragua
Tel: (505) 263- 2620Fax: (505) 263-2620
[seal] Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources
MARENA – Directorate General of Environmental Quality
87Annex 33
[logo]
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Environmental Permit, as prescribed in the environmental legislation in force in the
country.
25)The holder of the Environmental Permit undertakes to comply with the financial security
prescribed in A rticle 33 of Law 647, Reform of and Additions to Law No. 217,
General Environment and Natural Resources Act , once it has been defined by the
Ministry of the E nvironment and Natural Resources and published in The Gazette -
Official Journal.
The Environmental Permit granted hereby is valid only for the activities specified in the
information sent to the Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources. If the Proponent
intends to introduce any broadening or modification of the approved project, it must first apply to
MARENA for the appropriate permit.
This resolution determines that the project’s execution is environmentally feasible, subject to
compliance with the conditions prescribed therein, but it does not relieve the project’s legal
representative or owner of the obligation to comply with the other permits required by the laws
in force in the country, nor does it substitute for any other requirement which mi ght be
prescribed by other authorities.
This permit shall enter into force as of the date of delivery to the Proponent, a record of which
must be left, and if the project is not executed in the next 18 months, it must be renewed, for
which the MARENA shal l evaluate the conditions prevailing at the date thereof, being
empowered to authorize its renewal provided no changes or variations of the original
environmental parameters in the area of the project have occurred.
Done in the city of Managua on the twenty second day of December, 2008.
[SIGNED]
Hilda Espinoza Urbina
Director General
Directorate General of Environmental Quality
[seal]
[logo] Km 12 ½ Carretera Panamericana
Facing Corporación de Zonas Francas
Apartado Postal (PO Box) 5123, Managua, Nicaragua
Tel: (505) 263- 2620Fax: (505) 263-2620
[seal] Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources
MARENA – Directorate General of Environmental Quality
88 Annex 34
Ministry of the Enviroment and Natural Resources (MARENA)
Administrative Resolution No. 038-2008-A1
30 October 2009
8990 Annex 34
[logo]
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DGCA RESOLUTION No. 038-2008 – A1
Following examination of the application filed by Mr. Virgilio Silva, acting in his capacity as
Legal Representative of the Empresa Portuaria Nacional (EPN) company, for a broadening of the
Environmental Permit for the “I mprovement of Navigation on the San Juan de Nicaragua
River,” approved under Administrative Resolution No. 038- 2008 of the twenty eighth day of
August, two thousand nine, Registration No. 037-2006.
Following the review of the information in support of the change in the project’s components,
and specifically, part 1 of the environmental permit, which is reproduced verbatim as follows:
“This Environmental Permit is issued exclusively for improvement of the navigation route which
permits the communities in th e southeastern corner of the national territory to be in contact by
river with the rest of the country. The navigation channel shall have the following dimensions: in
its cross-section it shall be 20 meters wide at the bottom, 30 meters wide at the surface , and with
a minimum depth of 2 meters in the dry season, throughout a section 41,963.57 meters in length
which runs from the site known as Punta Chingo Petaca to the Estuary of the San Juan River,
plus the construction of an access canal to carry the equi pment required for the clean- up
operation from the Caribbean Sea to the Estuary of the San Juan de Nicaragua River, which
shall have a cross-section 40 meters wide at the bottom, 60 meters wide at the surface, and with
a minimum depth of 6 meters, along a total length of 2,000 meters.”
WHEREAS
I
The Environmental Permit under Administrative Resolution 038-2008, for the “Improvement of
Navigation on the San Juan de Nicaragua River” project stipulates that the Proponent must
submit a timely application to the Directorate General of Environmental Quality of MARENA
for the review and approval of any proposed modification of the project.
II
Law 217, General Environment and Natural Resources Act, as amended, provides in Article 27
that: “Projects, works, industries, or any other activity, whether public or private, by national or
foreign investment, during their pre -investment, execution, expansion, rehabilitation, or
conversion stages, which in view of their characteristics may provoke any deterioration of t he
environment or natural resources in accordance with the specified list of categories of works or
projects established in the respective Regulations must obtain an Environmental Permit prior to
their execution.”
III
According to the information submitte d by the P roponent, the changes consist of cleaning a
stream which connects the San Juan River with the Harbor Head Laguna in Nicaraguan territory,
[logo] Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources
Km 12 ½, North Highway, facing Corporación de Zonas Francas
Telephone: 22331112
e-mail: www.marena.gob.ni
91Annex 34
[logo]
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
using manual equipment. The clean- up work shall be performed along a length of 1,560 linear
meters with a ma ximum of 30 meters in width, with the starting point at reference coordinates
North 1208638 and East 863133, and the end point at coordinates North 1209823 and East
863450. The clean- up work will be performed with a dredge on a section that has become
sedimented, located at reference coordinates North 1208439 – East 863131, and (final)
coordinates North 1208134 – East 863136 and North 1208138 – East 963196, w3th a width of 59
meters by 300 meters in length and 6 meters in depth. A total of 37,500 m of sediment will be
removed in this activity, to facilitate navigation in these sections of the river.
Following performance of the technical inspection in the area in which the project’s field
activities will be conducted, in coordination with the project’s representatives.
THEREFORE:
The Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources, acting through the Directorate General
of Environmental Quality and in the use of the powers conferred by Law 290, Executive
Branch Organization, Competence, and Procedures Act, Article 28, part b, Regulations of
Law 290, Decree 25 -2006, Article 294, Law 217, General Environment and Natural
Resources Act, Articles 27, 28, 29, and all the foregoing technical considerations.
RESOLVES
First: To modify the Environmental Permit for the “Improvement of Navigation in the San
Juan River of Nicaragua” project, which has been requested by the Empresa Portuaria
Nacional company.
Second: Administrative Resolution No. 038-2008 is modified in regard to the components of the
third resolution, number 1, relating to the project’s location and components, so as henceforth to
read as follows:
Part 1) This Environmental Permit is issued exclusively for the rehabilitation of the navigation
route which improves contact by river between the communities in the southeastern corner of the
national territory and the rest of the country. The navigation channel shall have the following
dimensions: in its cross -section it shall be 20 meters wide at the bottom, 30 meters wide at the
surface, and with a minimum depth of 2 meters in the dry season, throughout a section 41,963.57
meters in length which runs from the site known as Punta Chingo Petaca to the Estuary of the
San Juan River. In addition, the company shall perform clean- up activities on a caño which
connects the San Juan River with the Harbor Head Lagoon, in Nicaraguan territory
The clean-up work shall be performed along a length of 1,560 linear meters with a maximum of
30 meters in width, with the starting point at reference coordinates North 1208638 and East
863133, and the end point at coordinates North 1209823 and East 863450. The clean -up work
will be performed with a dredge on a section that has increased in sediment, located at reference
[logo] Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources
Km 12 ½, North Highway, facing Corporación de Zonas Francas
Telephone: 22331112
e-mail: www.marena.gob.ni
92 Annex 34
[logo]
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
coordinates North 1208439 – East 863131, and (final) coordinates North 1208134 – East 863136
and North 1208138 – East 963196, with a width of 59 meters by 300 meters in length and 6
meters in depth. A total of 37,500 m 3of sediment will be removed in this activity, to facilitate
navigation in these sections of the river.
Third: The following modal charges are added to the third resolution element of this
environmental permit, under Administrative Resolution No. 038-2008:
26. The sediment dump sites must be identified and delimitated , chiefly making use of areas
cleared of vegetation to reduce the impact on the flora and fauna typical of the ecosystem in
question.
27. The sediments extracted as a consequence of the activities performed by the dredging
equipment may not be deployed within a minimum distance o f 50 meters in length from the
river bank, to avoid erosion and run- off of the sediments in question back to the river
channel.
28. Tree trunks or sections are to be used as barriers in the sediment dump areas.
29. All works must be supervised by EPN and have environmental monitoring by MARENA
specialists and the environment regent delegated by the EPN.
30. The clean-up work for maintenance of the stream must be done for the most part with
manual equipment such as (picks and shovels).
31. Ecological (mobile) latrines must be installed for use by the personnel working in the
project.
32. The equipment must be insured, and safety precautions must be taken to prevent
accidents among the workers, chiefly in the form of snake bites.
33. The requirements of the contingency program established in Resolution 038- 2008 must
be fulfilled for the movement and storage of hydrocarbons used in the project’s activities in
this stage.
34. During the performance of the activities, all domestic wastes must at all times be
collected and disposed of outside the area, in accordance with the technical environmental
rules for handling of non-hazardous wastes.
35. If it is not possible to avoid clearing vegetation, the affected vegetation must be replaced
and compensated for in the amount of 10 trees for every tree cut down, with species native to
the area. Natural regeneration of species must also be promoted.
[logo] Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources
Km 12 ½, North Highway, facing Corporación de Zonas Francas
Telephone: 22331112
e-mail: www.marena.gob.ni
93Annex 34
[logo]
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Fourth: All the remaining provisions of Administrative Resolution No. 038- 2008 remain in
force.
th
Done in the city of Managua on the 30 day of October, two thousand nine.
[SIGNED]
Hilda Espinoza Urbina
Director General
Directorate General of Environmental Quality
[seal]
[logo] Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources
Km 12 ½, North Highway, facing Corporación de Zonas Francas
Telephone: 22331112
e-mail: www.marena.gob.ni
94 Annex 35
Official Daily Gazette No. 46, Decree No. 36440-MP,Year CXXXIII.
La Uruca, San José, Costa Rica (1)
7 March 2011
By-Laws and Regulations, Presidency of the Republic,
National Commission on Risk prevention and attention to
emergencies Decision No. 0362-2011, Specific By-Laws regarding
purchasing and contracts procedures under exception mechanisms
regimen by virtue of the Declaration of a State of Emergency by
virtue of Decree No. 36440 (2)
21 September 2011
9596 Annex 35
(1) Official Daily Gazette No. 46
Decree No. 36440-MP
Year CXXXIII
La Uruca, San José, Costa RicaMonday, 7 March 2011
THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC AND THE MINISTER OF THE
PRESIDENCY
In the exercise of the authority conferred on them by Articles 140, sections 3) and 18)
and 180 of the Political Constitution, Articles 25 section 1), 2.7 section 1) 28 section b),
of Law No 6227 of 2 May 1978 which is the General Public Administration Law , and
Law No. 8488 of 11 January 2006 which is the National Law on Emergencies and Risk
Prevention.
Bearing in mind:
I.- That the constitutional system provides for special norms that allow the Executive
Branch to address emergency situations so that act ion in that regard can be as agile and
decisive as merited by the circumstances so as to discard or minimize the consequen ce
wrought by natural and human made disasters.
II.- That the Costa Rican State has the essential function of the protection of national
sovereignty, and in its preservation and defense the State is called upon to exercise all
necessary measures in observance of the civil and pacifist vocation that guides the Costa
Rican State, particularly those with regards to the abolition of the army, peace, neutrality
and the peaceful settlement of disputes by the use the mechanisms provided by
International Law.
III.- That the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is the vehicle by which the State carries out all
its tasks before any foreign Governments and Institutions. Further more, the Ministry for
Public Security is the entity responsible for defense of the territorial integrity of Costa
Rica. Equally, other entities of the State will be available to provide institutional support,
in conformity with their competence and responsibilities for those purposes.
IV.- That the military invasion and occupation of Costa Rica by Nicaragua, since October
2010, brought Nicaraguan troops that now occupy a part of the territory of Costa Rica, in
clear violation of its national sovereignty, territorial integrity and dignity.
V.- That the aforementioned represents a constant violation of the territorial, aerial and
maritime spaces of Costa Rica, thus impacting not only on its national sovereignt y, but
also causing serious environmental damage thr ough the destruction of fragile national
wetlands zones which are duly registered and recognized at the international level.
97Annex 35
VI.- That to this day Nicaragua continues to occupy and damage a part of the Costa Rican
territory with the presence of the Nicaraguan armed forces, in particular, in Isla Portillo -
Isla Calero, and that it also continues to carry out dredging activity which has caused
serious environmental damage to the abovementioned zone.
VII.- That as a result of actions carried out by the army of Nicaragua and the Government
of that country, normal functioning conditions for activity in several Costa Rican
communities along the border area, and of government institutions, have been disrupted,
because some have even become isolated as they lack the means to access basic services
such as health, food provisions, education, among others, and thus have been placed in an
evident vulnerable situation.
VIII.- That the zone that has been affected by the actions of the Nicaraguan Government
and Army is also under constant threat of natural phenomena that cause s flooding among
other effects.
IX.- That the National Law on Emergencies and Risk Prevention determines that “Those
within the national territ ory should count with the protection of their life, their physical
integrity, their property and the environment in the face of dangerous disasters or events
that may occur.”
X.- That the National Law on Emergencies and Risk Prevention defines as a disast er a
situation “or process that unfolds as the result of a phenomenon with a natural,
technological or man -made origin where a population is brought under conditions of
vulnerability, that cause s intense disruption of the community’s normal functioning
conditions, such as the loss of lives and health within the population, destruction or loss
of the collective’s property and severe damage to the environment.”
XI.- That the National Law on Emergencies and Risk Prevention understands an
emergency to be the crisis state created by the disaster.
XII.- That up until the present attention to the disaster created by the actions of the Army
and Government of Nicaragua has been enabled by resources and the ordinary procedures
that regulate Public Administration; ho wever, at the present moment resort to
mechanisms of exception provided by the Const itution and the Law is merited.
Therefore,
THEY DECREE:
“TO DECLARE THAT THE SITUATION UNFOLDED BY THE VIOLATION OF
COSTA RICAN SOVEREIGNTY ON THE PART OF NICARAGUA CONFORMS A
STATE OF EMERGENCY”
Article 1- A State of Emergency is declared in the following villages on the border with
Nicaragua: La Cruz, Upala, Los Chiles, S arapiquí, San Carlos and Pocosi; and also the
situations and/or processes that are being unleashed as a result of the activities illicitly
98 Annex 35
carried out by Nicaragua on Costa Rican territory, which threaten the life, physical
integrity and property of those within national territory, as well as the national
sovereignty and the environment.
Article 2-. To that effect, the present declaration of a state of emergency includes the
three phases established in the National Law on Emergencies and Risk Prevention which
are as follow:
a) Response phase.
b) Rehabilitation phase.
c) Reconstruction phase.
Article 3.- The present declaration of a state of emergency encompasses all the actions
and projects necessary for the protection of life, physical integrity, property and the
environment, as well as those necessary for attention , rehabilitation, reconstruction and
restoration of infrastructure, housing, communications and disrupted production activities
as well as all damaged public services within the zone covered under article 1) of this
Decree, all of which actions should be included in the General Emergency Plan approved
by the Governing Board of the National Commission on Risk Prevention and Attention to
Emergencies, in order that such attention and projects take place in conformity with the
concept of emergency.
Article 4.- In conformity with the stipulations of articles 15 and 38 and also the following
articles of the National Law on Emergencies and Risk Prevention, the Ministry for Public
Security will coordinate with the National Commission on Risk Prevention and Attention
to Emergencies, the Center for Emergency Operations (COE by its Spanish acronym),
and other coordination entities to facilitate the development of a General Emergency
Plan.
Article 5.- In conformity with stipulations of the National Law on Emergencies and Risk
Prevention, the Executive Branch, public institutions, autonomous and quasi autonomous
entities, State corporations, municipalities, as well as any other entity or public organism
are authorized to contribute, donate, transfer, and lend the necessary help and
collaboration t o the National Commission on Risk Prevention and Attention to
Emergencies.
Article 6.- For implementation of the present declaration of an emergency , the National
Commission on Risk Prevention and Attention to Emergencies, in conformity with the
National Law on Emergencies and Risk Prevention may assign funds and accept
donations from public and private entities.
Article 7-. As part of its attention to the present emergency, the National Commission on
Risk Prevention and Attention to Emergencies may use unassigned funds remaining from
other resolved or remaining emergencies as determined by the Governing Board of this
entity.
99Annex 35
Article 8-. The grounds of private property situated in the geographic area defined by this
declaration of an emergency state shall be bound to allow all the legal easements
necessary for the execution of these actions, processes and projects to be carried by
public entities in response to the emergency , as along as these are indispensable to the
opportune attention to the emergency in conformity with the stipulations of the Phase 1 of
the emergency.
Article 9-. The present declaration of an emergency state will be in effect during the
period of time det ermined by the Executive Branch, depending on reports issued by the
National Commission on Risk Prevention and Attention to Emergencies, or during the
maximum period of time established in Law 8488.
Article 10-. The present decree is in effect as of the moment of signature.
[The present decree was] s igned in the Presidency of the Republic the twenty-first of
February of the year two thousand eleven.
LAURA CHINCHILLA MIRANDA. – The Minister for the Preside ncy, Marco A.
Vargas Díaz. – 1 time. – O.C. No. 10971. – (Request No. 030- 2011). – C-64820. –
(D36440-IN2011016261).
100 Annex 35
(2)
BY-LAWS AND REGULATIONS, PRESIDENCY OF THE
REPUBLIC, NATIONAL COMMISSION ON RISK PREVENTION
AND ATTENTION TO EMERGENCIES Decision No. 0362– 2011,
SPECIFIC BY-LAWS REGARDING PURCHASING AND
CONTRACTS PROCEDURES UNDER EXCEPTION MECHANISMS
REGIMEN BY VIRTUE OF THE DECLARATION OF A STATE OF
EMERGENCY BY VIRTUE OF DECREE NO. 36440, 21 September
2011.
Digital signature of: José Luis Vargas Espinoza
/signature/
Identification number (DN, by its
Spanish acronym):
Serial number: CPF 02 -0255-0227,
sn: Vargas Espinoza
Given name: Jorge Luis,-CR, or
physical person
ou-citizen, cn - Jorge Luis Vargas
Espinoza/signature/
Date: 2011-09-22, 14:27:50-06 ‘00’
[Illegible] [Illegible] [Illegible]
BY-LAWS AND REGULATIONS
PRESIDENCY OF THE REPUBLIC
NATIONAL COMMISSION ON RISK PREVENTION
AND ATTENTION TO EMERGENCIES
Decision No. 0362 – 2011
SPECIFIC BY-LAWS REGARDING PURCHASING AND CONTRACTS
PROCEDURES UNDER EXCEPTION MECHANISMS REGIMEN
BY VIRTUE OF THE DECLARATION OF A
STATE OF EMERGENCY BY VIRTUE OF DECREE NO. 36440
Government of Costa Rica
BY LAWS AND REGULATIONS
PRESIDENCY OF THE REPUBLIC
NATIONAL COMMISSION ON RISK PREVENTION AND ATTENTION TO
EMERGENCIES
Governing Board
DECISION No. 0362-2011
101Annex 35
21 September 2011.
DECISION No. 0632-2011
SPECIFIC BY-LAWS REGARDING PURCHASING AND CONTRACTS
PROCEDURES UNDER EXCEPTION MECHANISMS REGIMEN
BY VIRTUE OF THE DECLARATION OF A
STATE OF EMERGENCY BY VIRTUE OF DECREE No. 36440
BEARING IN MIND:
1. That in carry out the specific purchasing and contracting process necessary by
virtue of the emergency resulting from the violation of Costa Rican sovereignty
by Nicaragua, on Isla Calero in particular, as well as the environmental damage
infringed on national territory, the declaration of an Emergency under Executive
Decree No. 36440 a specific mechanism under said decree is required for
purchasing and contracting processes.
2. That the specific nature of the event that created the emergency, which was an act
of aggression on the part of the neighbor country of Nicaragua, imposes taking
actions that are different from those generally carried out under the regimen of
exception and under the control of the National Commission on Risk Prevention
and Attention to Emergencies (from here on refe rred to as the Commission); the
situation requires highly specialized criteria from the institutions responsible for
attending to the problem, especially regarding characteristics of the equipment,
supplies and services that have to be purchased or contracted.
3. That the By -laws Regarding Procedures for the Institutional Purchasing by the
National Commission on Risk Prevention and Attention to Emergencies,
published in La Gaceta (The Gazette) No. 172 of Thursday, 3 September 2009, is
deficient regarding purchasing and contracting norms in the case of emergencies
in which it is not possible to delineate the first- response phase, rehabilitation and
reconstruction as established by article 30 of Law 8488. It is also deficient
regarding the option of extending Executive Units the purview, under the
exceptions mechanisms regimen, of institutional purchasing and contracting by
these institutions.
4. That by reason of the former the present procedure ha s the purpose of allowing
institutional purchasing by the entities appointed as Executive Units by the
Governing Board of the Commission carry out the purchasing and contracting
necessary for carrying out the General Emergency Plan, without undermining
obligations of the Commission of administering National Emergency Fund
regarding administration of designated resources, and to oversee procedures,
project development and disbursements, under Law No. 8488, the Executive
Units By -laws and the By -laws Regardin g Procedures for the Institutional
Purchasing by the Commission.
102 Annex 35
5. That under Law 8488, which regulates this Commission, the functions and scope
of the Governing Board arise from its stipulations:
a. By virtue article 180 of the Political Constitution and due to the budgetary
constraints declaration of the emergency allows for procedural exceptions
in order that the Government may swiftly obtain sufficient economic,
material, or other resources necessary for safeguarding persons, property
and services impacted upon by war, internal strife or public calamities.
(art. 31)
b. Declaration of an emergency is the option of the Executive Branch in
order that it may resort to flexible and agile mechanisms that override the
juridical order that regulates the ordinary activity of the Administration to
address urgent and unforeseen needs of persons and protect property when
surprise and unforeseen events take place, and even when they can be
foreseen but are inevitable; unusual situations that generally cannot be
controlled, managed or handled through ordinary measures.
In the face of such events the immediate need to address human needs and
protect endangered lives and property, the Constitution allows acts by way
of exception. This implies that criteria regarding need and urgency
override legal criteria that regulate the usual institutional activities (Vote
9410, Constitutional Chamber).
c. The exception mechanisms regimen encompasses administrative activity
and the designation of funds and public resources, so long as they a re
strictly necessary for the solution of commanding personal needs and for
the protection of property and services at a time of and unequivocal
connection between the event that provokes the state of emergency and the
damages provoked thereof. (art. 32)
d. Under the declaration of an emergency, all agencies, public institutions
and local governments are obliged to coordinate with the Commission,
which will have sole command over activities in the affected areas.
The general emergency plan developed by th e Commission must have
priority over the plan of each institution that affects it, until the Executive
Branch declares an end to the state of emergency. (art. 33)
e. In order to execute actions, projects and contracts, the Commission will
appoint as executive units public institutions with power over the area
where they are active, as long as they have the necessary structure to fulfill
commitments; the Commission as well as the executive units will be
obliged to develop investment plans with details regarding the actions,
projects and financial resources to be employed to address assigned roles,
which should be approved by the Governing Board of the Commission.
(art. 39).
103Annex 35
f. The Commission has exclusive jurisdiction over the administration of
National Emergency Fund resources which it will use to address and deal
with emergency situations, according to the declaration and in conformity
with the general emergency plan and the investment plans approved by the
Governing Board of the Commission.
g) In conformity with stipulations regarding compliance with jurisdiction and
responsibilities assigned to the Commission as contained in article No. 18
of the Law, it is within the purview of the Governing Board of the
Commission to approve the procedures regulating the a dministration and
use of National Emergency Fund resources.
THEREFORE:
In conformity with the above, the Governing board of the National Commission for Risk
Prevention and Attention to Emergencies decides:
A. To create SPECIFIC BY-LAWS REGARDING PURCHASING AND CONTRACTS
PROCEDURES UNDER EXCEPTION MECHANISMS REGIMEN BY VIRTUE OF
THE DECLARATION OF A STATE OF EMERGENCY BY VIRTUE OF DECREE
NO. 36440, which will be governed by the following articles:
Regarding procedures for the Authorization of Contracts:
1. Once a public institution is designated the Executive Unit in conformity with a
specific decision for that purpose, the governing Board of the Commission can
authorize the purchasing entity of the designated public institution to take
responsibility for contracting procedures for the purpose of executing the actions and
projects contained in the corresponding investment plan presented by the public
institution.
2. It is the responsibility of the Commission's Purchasing and Contracts division to advise
in the implementation of the Exceptions Mechanisms Regimen and the corresponding
norms that will govern the said regimen.
3. Oversight of procedures and contract compliance are the responsibility of the
comptroller department of the Executive Units.
Regarding Contract Procedures:
4. Prior to initiation of contract implementation the Executive Unit must sign a Letter of
Intention based on the stipulations of the Executive Unit's by -laws and on necessary
considerations for this special procedure.
5. In confo rmity with stipulations of the By -laws on Functions and Oversight of the
Executive Units, all contracts for goods and services requiring executive units shall be
undertaken in strict compliance with stipulations of the National Law on Emergencies
and Risk Prevention, its by -laws and the By -laws of the Purchasing and Contracts
division of the CNE with the necessary considerations regarding contracting under the
exceptions regimen, in complement to pertinent stipulations of the Administrative
contracting Law and its By-laws.
104 Annex 35
6. Authority in order that the Executive Units carry out their contractual activity shall be
exercised under the strict and exclusive application of the procedure described in article
no. 39, as of section b) of the By -laws of the Commi ssion's Purchasing and Contracts
division regarding the role of the division in contracts executed as a result of the
emergency.
7. Such authority does not include the purview over administration of National
Emergency Fund resources, it is limited to exec ution of emergency contracting
procedures in he framework of the Exceptions Mechanisms Regimen permitted by Law
8488. In this regard, prior to forwarding to the Executive Directorate investment plans to
be presented to the Governing Board, it is the responsibility of the Commission through
Executive Units comptroller departments to ensure garnering of the resources necessary
to ultimately honor monetary commitments, when the Executive Unit requests them.
These reserves ensure the budgetary content
required to give effect to the recruitment process, as required by the Law on
Administrative Contracting and its By-laws.
8. Payment procedures by the executive units shall be carried out in conformity with
article no. 27 of the By-law on Functions and Oversight of Executive Units.
Final Stipulations:
9. The present By -laws govern contracts related to the execution of the General
Emergency Plan developed on the basis of Decree No. 36440 which declares a state of
emergency in the face of the violations of Costa rican sovereignty by Nicaragua, and
regarding this particular situation, it suspend norms of inferior hierarchy.
10. The present By-laws shall be suspended and without effect once Decree No. 36440 is
overruled.
11. Supplementary application of the By -laws for Purchasing and Contracts, Law on
Administrative Contracting and its By-laws.
12. That which is not specifically governed by these By -laws shall be governed by the
By-laws for the Functions on Purchasing and Contracts division of the CNE, as well as
by theLaw on Administrative Contracts and its By-laws.
13. These By-laws shall be in effect as of their publication.
Msc. Sigifredo Pérez Fernández, Administrative Director for Finances.
- One time. - O. C. No. 14772. - Request No. 49892. - C-173650. -
(IN2011074828).
105106 Annex 36
Order n° 005 from the Chief of the South Military Detachment
for compliance of order from the Chief of staff regarding
the implementation of special measures based on provisional
measures of protection ordered by the International Court
of Justice and maintenance of the anti-drug trafficking plan,
rural, security plan and presidential Decree 79/2009 at
the San Juan de Nicaragua directorate.
9 March 2011
107108 Annex 36
ARMY OF NICARAGUA
“SECRET”
Copy No.02
C/Pages:-1-
SOUTH MILITARY DETACHMENT
ARMY OF NICARAGUA
SOUTH MILITARY DETACHMENT
TO: Chief, San Juan de Nicaragua Operations Directorate
ORDER N° 005 FROM THE CHIEF OF THE SOUTH MILITARY
DETACHMENT FOR COMPLIANCE OF ORDER FROM THE CHIEF OF
STAFF REGARDING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SPECIAL MEASURES
BASED ON PROVISIONAL MEASURES OF PROTECTION ORDERED BY
THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE AND MAINT AINANCE OF
THE ANTI-DRUG TRAFFICKING PLAN, RURAL SECURITY PLAN AND
PRESIDENTIAL DECREE 79/2009 AT THE SAN JUAN DE NICARAGUA
DIRECTORATE, MAP SCALE 1: 50.000 , LAST EDITION, DATED MARCH 9,
2011.
Pursuant to instructions from the Nicaraguan Army Chief of Staff regarding the
implementation of the resolution issued by the International Court of Justice on 8 March
2011 and the regulation and maintenance of the operational functionality of the San
Juan de Nicaragua Operations Directorate, I provideas follows:
1. It is prohibited to c arry out operations, patrols or any type of presence in the
territory defined by the International Court of Justice as Disputed Terri,ory
located north of the disputed channel, bordered on the west by the right bank of
the San Juan de Nicaragua River (0806-7), (1005-8) and on the east by Harbour
Head Lagoon (0907-6), (1007-3).
2. To maintain operations against drug- trafficking and other criminal activities in
the disputed territory , operations shall be conductedas provided by the
International Court of Justice. In thregard, operations and patrols shall be
carried out in the San Juan de Nicaragua River and Harbour Head Lagoon.
Owing to its content, this order shall remain in foruntil another order is issued to
revoke it.
Chief of the South Military Detachment
DEM Infantry Colonel
/s/ Illegible
CESAR BLADIMIR PERALTA JARQUIN
[Seal:] ARMY OF NICARAGUA
CHIEF
SOUTH MILITARY DETACHMENT
109Annex 36
110 Annex 37
Letter from Ricardo Echandi Z., Minister of Transport to
the Manager of the Institute of Lands and Colonies
11 February 1965
111112 Annex 37
San José, 11 February 1965
Mister
Manager of the Institute
of Lands and Colonies
Your Office
Dear Sir,
This ministry has initiated, with its own resources and assisted by funds derived from the
hiring of the refinery, the canalisation of Tortuguero in other words the opening of channels
for the inland waters of the Mohín Bay and San Juan River, to resolve in part the demand for
export and import, considering it advisable to make the Pacuar river suitable as a waterway,
up to a point near t he Indiana canal, where the Pacuar river receives the waters of the
Reventazón and allows entry of barges with medium wing engines.
As this latest project serves and greatly benefits the property recently acquired by your
Institute from the Compañía Bananera, I beg you to bring to the board of directors my request
for assistance to bring this project to a successful conclusion, especially if we could use the
dredger that in the negotiation of your Institute with the Compañía Bananera passed into your
possession and which is currently in Bataán.
Hoping for a prompt resolution of my petition , I take this opportunity to renew to you,
Mr. Manager, my most expressive thanks.
Sincerely,
Ricardo Echandi Z.
MINISTER OF TRANSPORT.
113114 Annex 38
Work Report of Official Pedro José Minas Núñez, National Police
to the Assistant Commissioner, Chief of the National Police,
Rio San Juan.
2 August 2000
115116 Annex 38
NATIONAL POLICE
RÍO SAN JUAN
Assistant Commissioner San Carlos, 2 August 2000
Luis Fernando Barrantes Jiménez
Chief of the National Police
Río San Juan
RE: WORK REPORT
Dear Chief,
According to your orders, we have concluded our information gathering visit to
San Juan del Norte related to the security of the President of the Republic, Dr. Arnoldo
Alemán Lacayo, during his upcoming visit there.
For this purpose we made a trip on the San Juan River from the place known as
The Delta, to the mouth of the river and and to the place known as Harbour Head
Lagoon, entering through a caño that connects to the same and to the place where there is
a small garrison of the Nicaraguan Army in a house on stilts.
This is a somewhat inhospitable area where conditions are not conducive to
stationing a permanent police outpost, although a security surveillance patrol could be
established there during the time or the days that the President will be there.
During our visit no member of the Costa Rican National Guard was observed
there. However, we did come to know that there are sometimes clandestine hunters in the
area who attempt to penetrate into the Indio Maíz Biological Reserve to steal wood,
mountain hogs and some bird species which they transport to Costa Rica in small boats.
Regarding security among the populace of San Juan del Norte, we obtained no
information that would indicate that anyone would attempt to undermine the President’s
visit, except that the populace complains about their economic and housing problems in
order to receive reconstruction aide from the government.
With nothing further to report, I extend my greeting to you and await your
instructions.
[Signed]
Official Pedro José Minas Núñez
117118 Annex 39
Letter from Mr. Norman Caldera Cardenal, Former Minister of Foreign Affairs
of Nicaragua to Mr. Alejandro Fiallos, Executive President of the National Ports
Company, Reference MRE/DM/037/01/06
10 January 2006
119120 Annex 39
REPUBLIC OF
NICARAGUA
CENTRAL AMERICA
[EMBLEM]
MINISTRY FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS
Managua, 10 January 2006
MRE/DM/037/01/06
Office of:
Mr. Alejandro Fiallos, Esq.
Executive President
National Ports Company
Dear Mr. Fiallos:
I have the pleasure of addressing y ou to inform you that as per my
recommendation, last Sunday, 4 December of the present year, a group from the Ministry
for Foreign Affairs and the National Army, and including the Nicaraguan representative
for the case regarding the Río San Jua n of Nicaragua, Dr. Mauricio Herdocia Sacasa,
toured the border posts along the river in the areas of San Carlos, Sarapiquí and San Juan
de Nicaragua. As a result of this visit an issue has come up which must be addressed as
an urgent matter.
The deputy mayor of San Juan de Nicaragua, José Juan Zambrana, brought up the
problem that the river dries up during the summer which becomes an obstacle for trade
with San Carlos because it forces trade to take place on the Costa Rican side of the river.
This increases the cost of the transactions, dependence and the trans -cultural dynamic in
the area, besides the circulation of foreign currency along with ours. I firmly believe that
Nicaragua should dredge the Río San Juan de Nicaragua as a task of prime importance
and urgency, even if only from the Delta area down to the mouth of the river at San
Juanillo (32 kms.)
This is a way of maintaining navigation unobstructed by sedimentation in view of
the rechanneling of water to the Colorado tributary. As Mr. Alejandro Bolaños would
say, this would be a way of returning to life a town that has been “Buried in oblivion,”
the title of one of his most patriotic and wonderful books. It goes without saying that
because it is a National River, we should protect it as histol and cultural patrimony
and as a source of development and national identity. Dredging is the best way to affirm
our Sovereignty.
________
Stamped
Received
121Annex 39
12 Jan 06
I have conversed with President Bolaños who has fully endorsed this project as a
matter of priority. I should note that there is the real possibility of working with the
Belgian company engaged in the Puerto de Corinto and El Escondido dredging projects.
Given the urgency of the matter , it is fundamental to proceed immediately with
this dredging project which the people of Nicaragua will surely receive with much
enthusiasm.
Dredging of the river, which has not been done in a long time, is a national
imperative indispensable to bring development to our people and facilitate navigation
along the river.
/Signed and sealed/
Norman Caldera Cardenal
122 Annex 40
Letter from Mr. Alejandro Fiallos Navarro Executive President of
National Ports Company to Mr C. Arturo Harding Lacayo,
Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources
18 January 2006
123124 Annex 40
National Ports Company
____________
[Stamped Received
by Environmental Protection
_25 June 2006]_
____________
[Stamped Received
by Minister’s office as MARENA
_25 June 2006]_
[Importance noted by hand on 25 June 2006 with instructions urgently respond and
advise material needs.]
PE-AFN-0051-01-2006
Managua, 18 January 2006
Office of:
Engineer
C. Arturo Harding Lacayo
Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources
Dear Mr. Harding:
In conformity with the decision made at the meeting held with Dr. Mauricio
Herdocia, Adviser to the Minister, on 21 December 2005 in the offices of the Ministry
under your command, I would like to cordially ask that you expedite as much as possible
the Environmental Impact Study (EIA, by the Spanish acronym) regarding the zone
known as Río San Juan.
This request is based on the fact that there are real possibilities that the Jan De
Nul Company, based in Belgium and which is presently engaged in dredging projects in
Puerto Corinto and El Bluff, can also carry out dredging projects needed in the above-
mentioned river in order to facilitate navigation and promote commerce along its length. I
should also mention the interest and unconditional support by the Presidency of
Bolonia Residences, From Nicaragua Optical 2 Streets to the Lake
One Street down; Managua Nicaragua
Tel.: 505-266-2545, 266-4271, Fax: 505-266-2555
Post Office Box 2727-3570, e-mail [email protected]
the Republic regarding this project, which is considered a project of national scope and
125Annex 40
much importance for the country.
Going ahead with the Environmental Impact Study will allow the Jan De Nul
Company to better plan its work and thus reduce as much as possible and take mitigation
measures regarding the negative impacts that may arise in the course of the project.
For your information, I am attaching the letter from the Foreign Minister of the
Republic requesting that this project be executed.
On the other hand, I wish to inform you that Engineer Julio C. Ordóñez, Deputy
Technical Manager, will be the EPN’s liaison in everything having to do with this
project. He may be contacted at the following telephone numbers: 222-059; and 222-
3837, Ext. 231 and 245.
I await your welcome instructions on this matter. It is a pleasure to convey my
best wishes and personal greeting.
Cordially,
[Signed]
Alejandro Fiallos Navarro
Executive President
cc: Engineer Julio Ordóñez L.
Deputy Technical Manager
126 Annex 41
Letter from Hilda Espinoza, General Director for Environmental
Quality, Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources to
Mr. Alejandro Fiallos Navarro Executive President of National
Ports Company
3 February 2006
127128 Annex 41
REPUBLIC OF
NICARAGUA
CENTRAL AMERICA
[EMBLEM]
MINISTRY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
M A R E N A
____________
[Stamped Received
by The Ministry for the Environment
and Natural Resources
_8 Feb 2006]_
____________
[Stamped Received
by the National Ports Co.
Executive President
and Natural Resources
_7 Feb 2006]_
____________
[Stamped Received
by Minister’s office atMARENA
_25 June 2006]_
General Directorate for
Environmental Quality
Managua, 3 February 2006
REF: DGCA-HEU-C083
Office of:
Mr. Alejandro Fiallos Navarro
Executive President
National Ports Company
Dear Mr. Fiallos:
This is i n response to your letter referenced PE -AFN-0051-01-2006, requesting
that the Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources (MARENA by its Spanish
acronym) proceed to carry out an Environmental Impact Study regarding the
Km. 12.5 Carretera Norte, In front of the Duty Free Zones Corp.
Telef.: 263-2830 and 263-2832/Fax: 263-2354, 263-2620, and 233-1505
Post Office Box 5123, Managua, Nicaragua, C.A.
129Annex 41
dredging of part of the Río San Juan. In this regard, I would like to convey that on the
basis of Decree 45 -94, “The Rules and Regulations for Permits and Evaluation of
Environmental Impact,” which defines the administrative procedures for the issuance of
Environmental Permits, the MARENA is empowered to determine the Points of
Reference for the Environmental Impact Study which must be prepared by the proponent
of the project and/or the party responsible for the execution of the project.
On the other hand, once information on water depth in the area is available, and
with information from other government entities and the MARENA itself, we will
proceed to establish the specific Points of Reference for this project. It is important to
notice tha t the Environmental Impact Study is a prerequisite for the granting of an
Environmental Permit.
It should also be mentioned that MARENA is committed to providing available
information, and to expediting review of the Environmental Impact Study and the
pertinent environmental permit.
With nothing further to add, I remain,
Cordially,
[signed]
Hilda Espinoza Urbina
General Director for
Environmental Quality
DGCA-MARENA
cc: Engineer Cristóbal Sequeira / Minister in MARENA
José Santos Mendoza, Esq., Secretary General of MARENA
Dr. Mario Meléndez, MARENA Legal Adviser
File
130 Annex 42
Memorandum from Mr. Engineer Cristóbal (Tito) Sequeira Minister,
Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources to
Mr. Bayardo Quintero, Director General for Protected Areas,
Reference CSG-091-02-06
28 February 2006 (1)
Memorandum from Mr. Engineer Cristóbal (Tito) Sequeira Minister,
Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources to
Dr. Iván Ortega Director, Secretariat of the Southeast
Nicaragua Biosphere Reserve, Reference CSG-091-02-06
28 February 2006 (2)
Memorandum from Mr. Engineer Cristóbal (Tito) Sequeira Minister,
Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources to
Dr. Juan José Romero Coordinator, PROCUENCA
Río San Juan, Reference CSG-091-02-06
28 February 2006 (3)
Memorandum from Mr. Engineer Cristóbal (Tito) Sequeira Minister,
Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources to
Engineer Arcadio Choza Head of the General Directorate for
Natural Resources and Biodiversity, Reference CSG-091-02-06
28 February 2006 (4)
131132 Annex 42
Memorandum from Mr. Engineer Cristóbal (Tito) Sequeira Minister,
Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources to
Mr. Bayardo Quintero, Director General for Protected Areas,
Reference CSG-091-02-06
28 February 2006 (1)
REPUBLIC OF
NICARAGUA
CENTRAL AMERICA
[EMBLEM]
GOVERNMENT OF NICARAGUA Office of the Minister
Ministry for the Environment
and Natural Resources
M A R E N A
____________
[Stamped Received
by Reception, MARENA General Directorate for
Environmental Control
2 March 2006
_(Reception)]_
MEMORANDUM
Ref. CSG-091-02-06
TO : Mr. Bayardo Quintero, Esq.
Director General for Protected Areas
FROM: Engineer Cristóbal (Tito) Sequei[Signed and sealed.]
MINISTER
CC : Lillian Osejo, Esq., Deputy Minister, MARENA
Hilda Espinoza, Esq., Dir, General Directorate, Environmental Protection
REF : Río San Juan Dredging Project
DATE: 28 February 2006
This is to inform you that we have received request for an environmental permit
for the Río San Juan Dredgi ng Project from the National Ports Company - EPN by its
Spanish acronym, which has been proposed for the Río San Juan Province.
I hereby cordially request your support to this project, which is of national
interest, in the form of the appointment of exper ts Milton Camacho, Esq., and Alejandro
Sevilla, Esq., from the Directorates for the Promotion of Protected Areas and
Management Directorate of the SINAP, respectively, in order that they become a part of
the institutional and multidisciplinary technicalam that will attend to this
environmental permit request.
Km. 12.5 Carretera Norte, In front of the Duty Free Zones Corp.
Telef.: 263-2830 and 263-2832/Fax: 263-2354, 263-2620, and 233-1505
Post Office Box 5123, Managua, Nicaragua, C.A.
133Annex 42
Further, it i s important to point out that we are in the stage where we need to
complete the Points of Reference which will be the basis for the Environmental Impact
Study of this project. For this reason it is of vital importance that we conclude the stage
where we at tend to the technical aspect that must be addressed based on your area of
expertise. This will facilitate the development of accurate Points of Reference.
We avail ourselves of the opportunity to invite the mentioned experts to a meeting
at the MARENA En vironmental Protection Directorate (DGCA) Conference Room, on
Monday, 6 March at 9:00am, where we will discuss and agree on criteria for the above
mentioned Points of Reference. This is something that needs to be concluded as soon as
possible due to its importance to this project.
Please confirm your participation in this meeting with Siglinda Baldelomar, Esq.,
at tel. 233-1504 and/or 263-2830, fax 263-2620 (General Directorate for Environmental
Protection. Attached is the proposed Points of Reference document.
Thank you in advance for your support. Please receive my cordial greeting.
134 Annex 42
Memorandum from Mr. Engineer Cristóbal (Tito) Sequeira Minister,
Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources to
Dr. Iván Ortega Director, Secretariat of the Southeast
Nicaragua Biosphere Reserve, Reference CSG-091-02-06
28 February 2006 (2)
REPUBLIC OF
NICARAGUA
CENTRAL AMERICA
[EMBLEM]
GOVERNMENT OF NICARAGUA Office of the Minister
Ministry for the Environment
and Natural Resources
M A R E N A
____________
[Stamped Received
by Reception, MARENA General Directorate for
Environmental Control
2 March 2006]
___________ _
____________
[Stamped Received
by Southeast Nicaragua Biosphere Reserve
2 March 2006
_(Excutive Secretary)]_
MEMORANDUM
Ref. CSG-091-02-06
TO : Dr. Iván Ortega
Director, Secretariat of the
Southeast Nicaragua Biosphere Reserve
FROM: Cristóbal (Tito) Sequeira
MINISTER
CC : Lillian Osejo, Esq., Deputy Minister, MARENA
Hilda Espinoza, Esq., Dir, General Directorate, Environmental Protection
REF : Río San Juan Dredging Project
DATE: 28 February 2006
This is to inform you that we have received request for an environmental permit
for the Río San Juan Dredging Project from the National Ports Comp- EPN by its
Spanish acronym, which has been proposed for the Río San Juan Province.
Km. 12.5 Carretera Norte, In front of the Duty Free Zones Corp.
Telef.: 263-2830 and 263-2832/Fax: 263-2354, 263-2620, and 233-1505
Post Office Box 5123, Managua, Nicaragua, C.A.
135Annex 42
I hereby cordia lly request your support to this project, which is of national
interest, by becoming part of the institutional and multidisciplinary technical team that
will attend to this environmental permit request.
Further, it is important to point out that we are in the stage where we need to
complete the Points of Reference which will be the basis for the Environmental Impact
Study of this project. For this reason it is of vital importance that we conclude the stage
where we attend to the technical aspect that must be addressed based on your area of
expertise. This will facilitate the development of accurate Points of Reference.
We avail ourselves of the opportunity to invite you to a meeting at the MARENA
Environmental Protection Directorate (DGCA) Conference Room, on Monday, 6 March
at 9:00am, where we will discuss and agree on criteria for the above mentioned Points of
Reference. This is something that needs to be concluded as soon as possible due to its
importance to this project.
Please confirm your participation in this meeting with Siglinda Baldelomar, Esq.,
at tel. 233-1504 and/or 263-2830, fax 263-2620 (General Directorate for Environmental
Protection. Attached is the proposed Points of Reference document.
Thank you in advance for your support. Please receive my cordial greeting.
136 Annex 42
Memorandum from Mr. Engineer Cristóbal (Tito) Sequeira Minister,
Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources to
Dr. Juan José Romero Coordinator, PROCUENCA
Río San Juan, Reference CSG-091-02-06
28 February 2006 (3)
REPUBLIC OF
NICARAGUA
CENTRAL AMERICA
[EMBLEM]
GOVERNMENT OF NICARAGUA Office of the Minister
Ministry for the Environment
and Natural Resources
M A R E N A
____________
[Stamped Received
by Reception, MARENA General Directorate for
Environmental Control
_2 March 2006]
___________ _
MEMORANDUM
Ref. CSG-091-02-06
TO : Dr. Juan José Romero
Coordinator, PROCUENCA
Río San Juan
FROM: Engineer Cristóbal (Tito) Sequei[Signed and sealed.]
MINISTER
CC : Lillian Osejo, Esq., Deputy Minister, MARENA
Hilda Espinoza, Dir., General Directorate, Environmental Protection
REF : Río San Juan Dredging Project
DATE: 28 February 2006
This is to inform you that we have received request for an Environmental Permit
for the Río San Juan Dredging Project from the National Ports Comp- EPN by its
Spanish acronym, which has been proposed for the Río San Juan Province.
I hereby cordially request your support to this project, which is of national
interest, by becoming a part of th e institutional and multidisciplinary technical team that
will attend to this environmental permit request.
Km. 12.5 Carretera Norte, In front of the Duty Free Zones Corp.
Telef.: 263-2830 and 263-2832/Fax: 263-2354, 263-2620, and 233-1505
Post Office Box 5123, Managua, Nicaragua, C.A.
137Annex 42
Further, it is important to point out that we are in the stage where we need to
complete the Points of Reference which will be the basis for the Environmental Impact
Study of this project. For this reason it is of vital importance that we conclude the stage
where we attend to the technical aspect that must be addressed based on your area of
expertise. This will facilitate the development of accurate Points of Reference.
We avail ourselves of the opportunity to invite the mentioned expert to a meeting
at the MARENA Environmental Protection Directorate (DGCA) Conference Room, on
Monday, 6 March at 9:00am, where we will discuss and agree on criteria for the above
mentioned Points of Reference. This is something that needs to be concluded as soon as
possible due to its importance to this project.
Please confirm your participation in this meeting with Siglinda Baldelomar, Esq.,
at tel. 233-1504 and/or 263-2830, fax 263-2620 (General Directorate for Environmental
Protection. Attached is the proposed Points of Reference document.
Thank you in advance for your support. Please receive my cordial greeting.
138 Annex 42
Memorandum from Mr. Engineer Cristóbal (Tito) Sequeira Minister,
Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources to
Engineer Arcadio Choza Head of the General Directorate for
Natural Resources and Biodiversity, Reference CSG-091-02-06
28 February 2006 (4)
REPUBLIC OF
NICARAGUA
CENTRAL AMERICA
[EMBLEM]
GOVERNMENT OF NICARAGUA Office of the Minister
Ministry for the Environment
and Natural Resources
M A R E N A
____________
[Stamped Received
by Reception, MARENA General Directorate for
Environmental Control
_28 Feb 2006]_
MEMORANDUM
Ref. CSG-091-02-06
TO : Engineer Arcadio Choza
Head of the General Directorate for
Natural Resources and Biodiversity
FROM: Cristóbal (Tito) Sequeira [Signed and sealed.]
MINISTER
CC : Lillian Osejo, Esq., Deputy Minister, MARENA
Hilda Espinoza, Esq., Dir., General Directorate, Environmental Protection
REF : Río San Juan Dredging Project
DATE: 28 February 2006
This is to inform you that we have received request for an environmental permit
for the Río San Juan Dredging Project from the National Ports Comp- EPN by its
Spanish acronym, which has been proposed for the Río San Juan Province.
I hereby cordially request your support to this project, which is of national
interest, in the form of the appointment of export Engineer Silvia Martínez, from the
Directorate for Water Resources, in order that she become a part of the institu tional and
multidisciplinary technical team that will attend to this environmental permit request.
Km. 12.5 Carretera Norte, In front of the Duty Free Zones Corp.
Telef.: 263-2830 and 263-2832/Fax: 263-2354, 263-2620, and 233-1505
Post Office Box 5123, Managua, Nicaragua, C.A.
139Annex 42
Further, it is important to point out that we are in the stage where we need to
complete the Points of Reference which will be the basis for the Environmental Impact
Study of this project. For this reason it is of vital importancthat we conclude the stage
where we attend to the technical aspect that must be addressed based on your area of
expertise. This will facilitate the development of accurate Points of Reference.
We avail ourselves of the opportunity to invite the mentione d expert to a meeting
at the MARENA Environmental Protection Directorate (DGCA) Conference Room, on
Monday, 6 March at 9:00am, where we will discuss and agree on criteria for the above
mentioned Points of Reference. This is something that needs to be concl uded as soon as
possible due to its importance to this project.
Please confirm your participation in this meeting with Siglinda Baldelomar, Esq.,
at tel. 233-1504 and/or 263-2830, fax 263-2620 (General Directorate for Environmental
Protection. Attached is the proposed Points of Reference document.
Thank you in advance for your support. Please receive my cordial greeting.
140 Annex 43
Letter from Mr. Engineer Cristóbal (Tito) Sequeira Minister,
Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources to
Mr. Claudio Gutierrez, Executive Director, INETER,
Reference DM-CSG-101-02-06
28 February 2006 (1)
Letter from Mr. Engineer Cristóbal (Tito) Sequeira Minister,
Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources to
Mr. Ricardo Vega Jackson, Minister MTI,
Reference DM-CSG-101-02-06
28 February 2006 (2)
141142 Annex 43
Letter from Mr. Engineer Cristóbal (Tito) Sequeira Minister,
Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources to
Mr. Claudio Gutierrez, Executive Director, INETER,
Reference DM-CSG-101-02-06
28 February 2006 (1)
REPUBLIC OF
NICARAGUA
CENTRAL AMERICA
[EMBLEM]
GOVERNMENT OF NICARAGUA Office of the Minister
Ministry for the Environment
and Natural Resources
M A R E N A
____________
[Stamped Received
by Reception, General Directorate for
Environmental Control
MARENA
_3 March 2006]_
Managua, 28 February 2006
Ref.: DM-CSG-101-02-06
Office of
Engineer CLAUDIO GUTIÉRREZ
Executive Director
INETER
Dear Mr. Gutiérrez,
This is to inform you that we have received request for an environmental permit
for the Río San Juan Dredging Project from the National Ports Company - EPN by its
Spanish acronym, which has been proposed for the Río San Juan Province.
I hereby cordiallyrequest your support to this project, which is of national
interest, in the form of the appointment of expert Engineer Isaías Montoya Blanco from
the Technical Directorate for Water Resources, in order that he become a part of the
institutional and multidisciplinary technical team that will attend to this environmental
permit request.
Km. 12.5 Carretera Norte, In front of the Duty Free Zones Corp.
Telef.: 263-2830 and 263-2832/Fax: 263-2354, 263-2620, and 233-1505
Post Office Box 5123, Managua, Nicaragua, C.A.
143Annex 43
Further, it is important to point out that we are in the stage where we need to
complete the Points of Reference which will be the basis for the Environmental Impact
Study of this project. For this reason it is of vital importance that we conclude the stage
where we attend to the technical aspect that must be addressed based on your area o f
expertise. This will facilitate the development of accurate Points of Reference.
We avail ourselves of the opportunity to invite the mentioned expert to a meeting
at the MARENA Environmental Protection Directorate (DGCA) Conference Room, on
Monday, 6 March at 9:00am, where we will discuss and agree on criteria for the above
mentioned Points of Reference. This is something that needs to be concluded as soon as
possible due to its importance to this project.
Please confirm your participation in this mee ting with Siglinda Baldelomar, Esq.,
at tel. 233-1504 and/or 263-2830, fax 263-2620 (General Directorate for Environmental
Protection. Attached is the proposed Points of Reference document.
Thank you in advance for your support.
Cordially,
[Signed and sealed]
CRISTOBAL (Tito) SEQUEIRA
Minister
cc: Engineer Lillian Osejo / Deputy Minister MARENA
Hilda Espinoza U. , Esq / Dir. DGCA - MARENA
Engineer Luis Palacios, Dir., General Directorate,
Water Resources, INETER
File
144 Annex 43
Letter from Mr. Engineer Cristóbal (Tito) Sequeira Minister,
Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources to
Mr. Ricardo Vega Jackson, Minister MTI,
Reference DM-CSG-101-02-06
28 February 2006(2)
REPUBLIC OF
NICARAGUA
CENTRAL AMERICA
[EMBLEM]
GOVERNMENT OF NICARAGUA Office of the Minister
Ministry for the Environment
and Natural Resources
M A R E N A
____________
[Stamped Received
by MTI Reception, Public Service Center
MARENA
_2 March 2006]_
______________
[Stamped Received
by MARENA General Directorate for
Environmental Control
_3 March 2006]_
Managua, 28 February 2006
Ref.: DM-CSG-101-02-06
Office of
MR. RICARDO VEGA JACKSON, ESQ.
Minister MTI
Dear Mr. Vega
This is to inform you that we have received request for an environmental permit
for the Río San Juan Dredging Project from the National Ports Compa-EPN by its
Spanish acronym, which has been proposed for the Río San Juan Province.
I hereby cordially request your support to this project, which is of national
interest, in the form of the appointment of experts Rosario Cajina, Esq., and Engineer
Enrique Torres from the Directorates for Environmental Initiatives and Maritime
Transport, respectively, in order that they become a part of the institutional and
multidisciplinary technical team that will attend to this environmental permit request.
Further, it is important to point out that we are in the stage where we need to
complete the Points of Reference which will be the basis for the Environmental Impact
Km. 12.5 Carretera Norte, In front of the Duty Free Zones Corp.
Telef.: 263-2830 and 263-2832/Fax: 263-2354, 263-2620, and 233-1505
Post Office Box 5123, Managua, Nicaragua, C.A.
145Annex 43
Study of this project. For this reason it is of vital importance that we con clude the stage
where we attend to the technical aspect that must be addressed based on your area of
expertise. This will facilitate the development of accurate Points of Reference.
We avail ourselves of the opportunity to invite the mentioned experts to a meeting
at the MARENA Environmental Protection Directorate (DGCA) Conference Room, on
Monday, 6 March at 9:00am, where we will discuss and agree on criteria for the above
mentioned Points of Reference. This is something that needs to be concluded as soon as
possible due to its importance to this project.
Please confirm your participation in this meeting with Siglinda Baldelomar, Esq.,
at tel. 233-1504 and/or 263-2830, fax 263-2620 (General Directorate for Environmental
Protection. Attached is the proposed Points of Reference document.
Thank you in advance for your support.
Cordially,
[Signed and sealed]
CRISTOBAL (Tito) SEQUEIRA
Minister
cc: Engineer Lillian Osejo / Deputy Minister MARENA
Hilda Espinoza U. , Esq / Dir. DGCA - MARENA
Libio Bendaña, Esq. / Dir. Environmental Initiatives MTI
Engineer Jurgen Senngelman / Dir. Maritime Transport MTI
File
146 Annex 44
Memorandum fromArcadio Choza, Director General of
MARENA’s Department of Natural Resources and Biodiversity
to Silvia Martinez E., MARENADirector for Water Resources
3 March 2006
147148 Annex 44
REPUBLIC OF
NICARAGUA
CENTRAL AMERICA
[EMBLEM]
GOVERNMENT OF NICARAGUA Directorate for Natural Resources
Ministry for the Environment and Biodiversity
and Natural Resources
M A R E N A
____________
[Stamped Received
by Reception, MARENA
General Directorate for
Environmental Control
_3 March 2006]_
MEMORANDUM
TO : Engineer Silvia Martínez E. [Signed and sealed]
Director for Water Resources
FROM: Engineer Arcadio Choza L., Director General
REF : AS INDICATED
DATE: 3 March 2006
This is to inform you that upon the request of the DISUP, we are assigning you to report
on 6 March at 9am to Environmental ProtectioDirectorate Conference Room in order
that you join the technical and multidisciplinary institutional team that will be in charge
of the request for an Environmental Permit regarding dredging of the Río San Juan.
The memorandum requesting this permit i s attached; it includes the Points of Reference
that will govern the Environmental Impact Study.
You attention to this matter would be appreciated. I extend greetings.
cc: Engineer Cristóbal (Tito) Sequeiro, Ministro at MARENA
Lillian Osejo, Deputy Minister, MARENA
Hilda Espinoza, Head of the General Directorate for Environmental Protection
Chron file
Km. 12.5 Carretera Norte, In front of the Duty Free Zones Corp.
Telef.: 263-2830 and 263-2832/Fax: 263-2354, 263-2620, and 233-1505
Post Office Box 5123, Managua, Nicaragua, C.A.
149150 Annex 45
Letter from Hilda Espinoza, General Director for Environmental
Quality, Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources to
Mr. Alejandro Fiallos Navarro Executive President of National
Ports Company, Reference DGCA-HEU-C 189-03-2006
20 March 2006
151152 Annex 45
REPUBLIC OF
NICARAGUA
CENTRAL AMERICA
[EMBLEM]
GOVERNMENT OF NICARAGUA
Ministry for the Environmentand Natural Resources
M A R E N A
____________
[Stamped Received
by Office of the Minister, MARENA
Protected Areas
_24 March 2006]_
____________
[Stamped Received
by Legal Division
MARENA
_24 March 2006]_
____________
[Stamped Received
by Public Service Center
MARENA
_24 March 2006]_
MEMORANDUM
Managua, 20 March 2006
DGCA-HEU-C 189-03-2006
Mr. Alejandro Fiallos N.
Executive President, EPN
Fax no. 222-2059
Managua
Dear Mr. Fiallos,
This is to follow up on decisions made at the meeting which took place at the
Foreign Ministry of the Republic on 20 Febru2006. Regarding duties required for
dredging projects by environmental legislation and which th e National Ports Company
(EPN by its Spanish acronym) must complied, last 9 March 2006 we forwarded
Km. 12.5 Carretera Norte, In front of the Duty Free Zones Corp.
Telef.: 263-2830 and 263-2832/Fax: 263-2354, 263-2620, and 233-1505
Post Office Box 5123, Managua, Nicaragua, C.A.
153Annex 45
to you the Official Points of Reference for the development of the Environment Impact
Study on the Río San Juan Dredging Project along the 42 kilometres singled out for
dredging the end of the river.
On 20 February 2006 we al so forwarded you the list of professionals with
expertise in the development of Environmental Impact Studies and who can be called
upon to integrate the team put together to carry out the Río San Juan Dredging Project
Environmental Impact Study on behalf of the EPN . Later, on 3 March 2006, we
forwarded the budget for the project’s onsite assessment visit.
Regarding your statement in correspondence PE -AFN-244-03-2006 on the t ime
and estimated cost of the studies, as well as issues to be taken into account in evaluating
bids you receive from consultants you contact, we regret we cannot help you because in
responding to this we would be getting involved in matters pertaining strictly to the
investor interested in launching a project, which would make us both judge and jury,
which would not be healthy for proper decision-making.
We reiterate our support for this project due to its importance for the nation.
Cordially,
[Signed and sealed.]
Hilda Espinoza U.
Director General for
Environmental Protection
MARENA
cc: Mr. Cristóbal Sequeira, Minister, MARENA
Mr. Norman Caldera, Foreign Minister of
the Republic
Mr. Mauricio Herdocia, Advisor to the
Foreign Ministry of the Republic
Mr. Noel Salinas, Technical Manager, EPN
Mr. Mario Meléndez, Legal Advisor, MARENA
File 037-2006
154 Annex 46
Letter from Engineer Noel S. Salinas Alvarado, Technical Manager,
National Ports Company to Members of the Institutional Commission,
Río San Juan Dredging Project, Engineer Milton Medina MARENA
Delegate, Engineer Sergio Cordonero, INETER delegate,
Reference GT-0237-03-2006
25 March 2006
155156 Annex 46
REPUBLIC OF
NICARAGUA
CENTRAL AMERICA
[EMBLEM]
GOVERNMENT OF NICARAGUA
National Ports Company
EPN, by its Spanish acronym
TECHNICAL MANAGEMENT DEPT.
____________
[Stamped Received
by Reception, MARENA
_27 March 2006]_
____________
[Stamped Received
by EPN Admin. Management
_27 March 2006]_
____________
[Stamped Received
by INETER
_27 March 2006]_
____________
[Stamped Received
by EPN Purchasing Unit
_27 March 2006]_
Managua, 25 March 2006
GT-0237-03-2006
Members of the Institutional Commission
Río San Juan Dredging Project
Engineer Milton Medina
MARENA Delegate
Engineer Sergio Cordonero
INETER Delegate
Km. 12.5 Carretera Norte, In front of the Duty Free Zones Corp.
Telef.: 263-2830 and 263-2832/Fax: 263-2354, 263-2620, and 233-1505
Post Office Box 5123, Managua, Nicaragua, C.A.
157Annex 46
Engineer Luis García
DGTA-MTI Delegate
Dear Engineers:
I hereby call you to a meeting on Tuesday, 28 March 2006 at 3pm in my office for
the purpose of discussion on several topics having to do with the Río San J uan Dredging
Project.
With nothing further to address, I thank you in advance for your punctual
attendance.
Cordially,
[Signed and sealed.]
Engineer Noel S. Salinas Alvarado
Technical Manager
cc: Advisor to the Executive President
Engineer A. Smith C.
Purchasing Unit (U. de A.)
Chronological File
158 Annex 47
Letter from Hilda Espinoza, General Director for Environmental Quality,
Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources to
Mr. Alejandro Fiallos Navarro Executive President of National Port Authority,
Reference DGCA-HEU-C-413-07-2006
3 July 2006 (1)
Memorandum from Hilda Espinoza, General Director for Environmental
Quality, Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources to
Dr. Ivan Ortega G. Director of the Secretariat of the Biosphere Reserve
of Southeast Nicaragua , Reference DGCA–HE–324–07-06
4 July 2006 (2)
159160 Annex 47
Letter from Hilda Espinoza, General Director for Environmental Quality,
Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources to
Mr. Alejandro Fiallos Navarro Executive President of National Port Authority,
Reference DGCA-HEU-C-413-07-2006
3 July 2006 (1)
[coat of arms]
Government of Nicaragua
Ministry of Environment
And Natural Resources
MARENA General Directorate of Environmental Quality
Managua, 3 July 2006.
DGCA-HEU - C -413- 07-2006
Engineer
Alejandro Fiallos
Executive President of
National Port Authority (EPN)
Fax 266 2555
Managua.-
Dear Mr. Fiallos,
In compliance with our work schedule related to the project "Dredging of the San Juan River"
we hereby inform you that it has been planned to perform the second visit from 11 to 15 July
2006, for which we have been in contact with Alberta Smith, EPN engineer, to make
arrangements with the other institutions that form part of the assessment team for the
Environmental Impact Study.
However, due to the limitations faced by the technical assessment team on the first inspection
visit conducted last March, regarding payment of accommodation, we request a modification
to the budget presented by MARENA in a communication of March 3, 2006, with specific
reference to the section on accommodation, defining a travel allowance of C$350.00 per
person per day, which corresponds to the travel allowance that MARENA has defined for that
area of the country.
Thanking you for your attention to this, I remain.
Sincerely,
[signature] [seal]
Lic. Hilda Espinoza U
General Director of Environmental Quality
MARENA
Cc. Archive.
161Annex 47
Memorandum from Hilda Espinoza, General Director for Environmental
Quality, Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources to
Dr. Ivan Ortega G. Director of the Secretariat of the Biosphere Reserve
of Southeast Nicaragua , Reference DGCA–HE–324–07-06
4 July 2006 (2)
[coat of arms]
Government of Nicaragua
MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MEMORANDUM
DGCA – HE – 324 – 07 - 06
To : Dr. Ivan Ortega G.
Director of the Secretariat of the Biosphere Reserve of Southeast Nicaragua
From : Lic. Hilda Espinoza, General Director ofEnvironmental Quality –DGCA
Date : 04 July 2006
Subject: SECOND VISIT SAN JUAN RIVER DREDGING
In compliance with our work schedule related to the project "Dredging of the San Juan River"
we hereby inform you that , in conjunction with the National Port Authority (EPN)
responsible for the project, it has been planned to perform the second visit from 11 to 15 July
2006. In this respect we request your cooperation in relation to the use of the panga boat,
since the fuel will be taken care of by the National Port Authority(EPN).
Likewise we inform you that we will be coordinating with the Delegation of MARENA / Río
San Juan and Mr. Roger G ómez, who is part of the assessment team for the Environmental
lmpact Study.
Thanking you for your attention to this, I remain.
Sincerely,
Cc: José Luis Galeano, engineer / Delegate San Juan River
Record 037 - 2006
162 Annex 48
Memorandum from Edda Martínez, Director of Environmental Evaluation
and Protection, Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources
(MARENA) to Adelina Ramírez, Documentation Center MARENA,
Reference DGCA – EM – M291
2 August 2006 (1)
Memorandum from Edda Martínez, Director of Environmental Evaluation
and Protection, Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources
(MARENA) to José Luis Galeano MARENA Delegate Río San Juan ,
Reference DGCA – EM – M292
2 August 2006 (2)
Letter from Edda Martínez, Director of Environmental Evaluation and
Protection, Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources
(MARENA) to Mr. Francisco Díaz Rivas, Municipality El Castillo,
Reference DGCA– EM – C208
2 August 2006 (3)
Letter from Edda Martínez, Director of Environmental Evaluation and
Protection, Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources
(MARENA) to Mr. César Collado Parada, Municipality San Juan
del Norte Reference DGCA– EM – C209
2 August 2006 (4)
Letter from Edda Martínez, Director of Environmental Evaluation and
Protection, Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources
(MARENA) to Alejandro Fiallos, engineer,
Reference DGCA – EM – C210
2 August 2006 (5)
163164 Annex 48
Memorandum from Edda Martínez, Director of Environmental Evaluation
and Protection, Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources
(MARENA) to Adelina Ramírez, Documentation Center MARENA,
Reference DGCA – EM – M291
2 August 2006 (1)
[coat of arms]
Government of Nicaragua
MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
GENERAL DIRECTORATE OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
MEMORANDUM
REF: DGCA – EM – M291
To : AdelinaRamírez
Documentation Center
MARENA
From : EddaMartínez
Director of Environmental Evaluation and Protection
Date : 02/08/2006
Subject: Public Consultation
I hereby inform you that the National P ort Authority – EPN has requested an environmental
permit for the P roject “Dredging San Juan River ”, to be developed in the R ío San Juan
Department. As part of the a dministrative procedures for granting such a permit, it is
necessary to do a publicthonsultationof thethforementioned project, which will be carried
out from Wednesday 9 until Tuesday 15 of August this year at the Municipality of El
Castillo, the Municipality of San Juan del Norte and the MARENA Delegation in Río San Juan
and on Wednesday 9 th, Friday 11thMonday 14 , Tuesday 15 th and Wednesday 16 thof
August this year at MARENA Central’s Documentation Center.
We request the support of the CEDOC in establishingthe necessary arrangementsto ensure
that the attached document is available to those interested (attached Environmental Impact
Document and formats for consultation) in the CEDOCin the period set forth above.
I request that after completion of this consultation, you send us the comments generated in
this process, properly sealed, to our address
With nothing further, I salute you.
Sincerely.
Cc: Hilda Espinoza / Director DGCA
Medardo lópez / Director DGCTOC
Luisamanda Castillo / Director PublicService
Record 037-2006
165Annex 48
Memorandum from Edda Martínez, Director of Environmental Evaluation
and Protection, Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources
(MARENA) to José Luis Galeano MARENA Delegate Río San Juan ,
Reference DGCA – EM – M292
2 August 2006 (2)
[coat of arms]
Government of Nicaragua
MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
GENERAL DIRECTORATE OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
MEMORANDUM
REF: DGCA – EM – M 292
To : José Luis Galeano
MARENA Delegate
Río San Juan
From : Edda Martínez
Director of Environmental Evaluation and Protection
Date : 02/08/2006
Subject: Public Consultation
I hereby inform you that the National P ort Authority – EPN has requested an environmental
permit for the P roject “Dredging San Juan River ”, to be developed in the Río San Juan
Department. As part of the a dministrative procedures for granting such a permit, it is
necessary to do a public consultationof the aforementioned project, which will be carried
out from Wednesday 9 thuntil Tuesday 15 thof August this year at the Municipality of El
Castillo, the Municipthity of San th,n del Nortethnd the MARENthDelegation in Río SathJuan
and on Wednesday 9 , Friday 11 Monday 14 , Tuesday 15 and Wednesday 16 of
August this year at MARENA Central’s Documentation Center.
We most cordially request your support in establish ing arrangements to ensure that the
attached document is available to those interested (att ached Environmental Impact
Document and formats for consultation) in the offices of the delegation in the period set
forth above.
I request that after completion of this consultation, you coordinate with the municipality of
El Castillo and the municipalit y of San Juan de l Norte, for dispatching of the Environmental
Impact Document and the comments generated in the processto the General Directorate of
Environmental Quality.
With nothing further, I salute you.
Sincerely.
Cc: Hilda Espinoza / Director DGCA
Medardo lópez / Director DGCTOC
Record: 037-2006
166 Annex 48
Letter from Edda Martínez, Director of Environmental Evaluation and
Protection, Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources
(MARENA) to Mr. Francisco Díaz Rivas, Municipality El Castillo,
Reference DGCA– EM – C208
2 August 2006 (3)
[coat of arms]
Government of Nicaragua
Ministry of Environment
And Natural Resources General Directorate of Environmental Quality
MARENA
Managua, Wednesday 2 August 2006
REF: DGCA — EM — C208
Mr. Francisco Díaz Rivas
Municipality
El Castillo
Your office.
Dear Mr. Díaz,
I hereby most cordially inform you that the National P ort Authority – EPN has requested an
environmental permit for the project “ Dredging San Juan River ”.As part of the
administrative procedures for granting such a permit , it is necessary to do a public
consultationof the aforementioned project, which will be carried out from Wednesday,
August 9 thuntil Tuesday August 15 , 2006, at the MARENA Delegation in Río San Juan, the
Municipality of El Castillo and Municipality of San Juan del Norte, and on Wednesday 9 th,
th, th th th
Friday 11 Monday 14 , Tuesday 15 and Wednesday 16 of August 2006 at MARENA
Central’s Documentation Center.
We most cordially request your support in esta blishing arrangements to ensure that the
attached document is available to those interested (attached Environmental Impact
Document and formats for consultation ) in the offices of the Municipality in the period set
forth above.
I request that, after compl etion of the period of this consultation, you forward the
Environmental Impact Document and the comments generated in the process in a sealed
envelope to the General Directorate of Environmental Quality.
With nothing further, I salute you.
Sincerely,
[signature] [seal]
EddaMartínez
Director of Environmental Evaluation and Protection
DGCA / MARENA
Cc: José Luis Galeano R. / MARENA Delegate in Río San Juan
Record 037-2006
167Annex 48
Letter from Edda Martínez, Director of Environmental Evaluation and
Protection, Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources
(MARENA) to Mr. César Collado Parada, Municipality San Juan
del Norte Reference DGCA– EM – C209
2 August 2006 (4)
[coat of arms]
Government of Nicaragua
Ministry of Environment
And Natural Resources General Directorate of Environmental Quality
MARENA
Managua, Wednesday 2 August 2006
REF: DGCA — EM — C209
Mr. César Collado Parada
Municipality
San Juan del Norte
Your office.
Dear Mr. Collado,
I hereby most cordially inform you that the National Port Authority – EPN has requested an
environmental permit for the project “ Dredging San Juan River ”.As part of the
administrative procedures for granting such a permit, it is necessary to do a public
consultatthnof the aforementioned pthject, which will be carried out from Wednesday,
August 9 until Tuesday August 15 , 2006, at the MARENA Delegation in Río San Juan, the
Municipality of El Castillo and Municipality of San Juan del Norte, and on Wednesday 9 t,
Friday 11 th,Monday 14 , Tuesday 15 thand Wednesday 16 thof August 2006 at MARENA
Central’s Documentation Center.
We most cordially request your support in establish ing arrangements to ensure that the
attached document is available to those interested (attached Environmental Impact
Document and formats for consultation ) in the offices of the Municipality in the period set
forth above.
I request that, after completion of the period of this consultation, you forward the
Environmental Impact Document and the comments generated in the processin a sealed
envelope to the General Directorate of Environmental Quality.
With nothing further, I salute you.
Sincerely,
[signature] [seal]
EddaMartínez
Director of Environmental Evaluation and Protection
DGCA / MARENA
Cc: José Luis Galeano R. / MARENA Delegate in Río San Juan
Record 037-2006
168 Annex 48
Letter from Edda Martínez, Director of Environmental Evaluation and
Protection, Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources
(MARENA) to Alejandro Fiallos, engineer,
Reference DGCA – EM – C210
2 August 2006 (5)
[coat of arms]
Government of Nicaragua
Ministry of Environment
And Natural Resources General Directorate of Environmental Quality
MARENA
Managua, Wednesday 2 August 2006
REF: DGCA — EM — C210
Alejandro Fiallos, engineer
Dredging San Juan River
Your office.
Dear engineer Fiallos,
I herebymost cordially request your efforts to dispatch the attached Environmental Impact
Documentsso that they can be delivered to the MARENA Delegation inRío San Juan, the
Municipality of El Castillo and the Municipality of San Juan del Norte.
Based on the above ,those documthts must be submitted to the locations listed above no
later than Monday August 7 of the current year and the receipt notes of the
documentation must be submitted no later than Wednesday August 9th of the current year,
to the Office of Environmental Impact Evaluation of MARENACentral.
Furthermore, I send you the format for the notice of availability which must be publishe d in
accordance with the attached provisions.
Any variation to what is stipulated here willbe a reason for cancellation of the public
consultation process.
With nothing further, I salute you.
Sincerely,
[signature] [seal]
EddaMartínez
Director of Environmental Evaluation and Protection
DGCA / MARENA
Cc: Hilda Espinoza / Director DGCA
Record 037-2006
169170 Annex 49
Letter from Ing. Leonardo Zacarias Coreo T. General Manager Corea y Asociados
S.A. (CORASCO) to Liliam Osejo Sacasa Deputy Minister
Environment and Natural Resources (MARENA)
21 Sepember 2006
171172 Annex 49
COREA Y ASOCIADOS S.A. (CORASCO)
Managua, 21 September 2006
Engineer
LILIAM OSEJO SACASA
Deputy Minister MARENA
Your office
Ref: Environmental Impact Study for the Improvement
of Navegation on the San Juan River (Delta – San
Juan de Nicaragua)
Dear Deputy Minister,
In fulfillment of the commitment made by our company in a meeting held at the offices of the
National Port Authority (EPN) with yourself and personnel of the institution that you run on
the day of 13 September 2006, I am hereby transmitting two (2) CD s containing the
electronic files from the following studies:
1 Environmental Impact Study, which contains the following folders:
a. Environmental Impact Study
i. Complete document of the Environmental Impact Study
ii. Annexes
b. Environmental Impact Document (EID)
These documents contain all of the information and analysis of the different specialists who
participated in the preparation of the Environmental Impact Study.
Hoping this information satisfies the requirements of MARENA, we are at your disposal
together with our team of specialists for any clarification relating to the document.
That being all, please receive my regards, wishing you success in your efforts.
Sincerely.
[signature]
Ing. Leonardo Zacarias Coreo T.
General Manager
Coreo y Asociados S.A. (CORASCO)
Cc: Ing. Milton Medina MARENA Reviewer Team Coordinator
Archive
173174 Annex 50
Letter from Ing. Noel S. Salinas Alvarado Technical Manager ,
National Port Authority to Hilda Espinoza General Directorate of Environmental
Quality Control, Ministry for the Environment and
Natural Resources (MARENA) Reference GT-0791-09-2006
22 September 2006
175176 Annex 50
[coat of arms]
Government of Nicaragua
National Port Authority
EPN TECHNICAL MANAGEMENT
Managua, 22 September 2006
GT-0791-09-2006
Licentiate
Hilda Espinosa U.
General Directorate of Environmental Quality Control
MARENA
Your Office
Dear LicentiateEspinosa,
I am pleased to send you enclosed with this letter a printed set of the Environmental Impact
Study of the Rio San Juan de Nicaragua on a stretch of 42 kilometers, between the delta of
the Colorado and San Juan de Nicaragua; it consists of three volumes that correspond to the
following:
• Environmental Impact Study
• Document (EID)
• Annexes containing separately the information prepared by each member of the
CORASCO team
That being all, we take this opportunity to send you a cordial greeting.
Sincerely,
[signature] [seal]
Ing. Noel S. Salinas Alvarado
Technical Manager
Cc: Lic. Alejandro Fiallos Executive President of EPN
Lic. Tito Sequeira Minister MARENA
Ing. Lilliam Osejo Deputy Minister of MARENA
Lic. Gonzalo Rodriguez Advisor to the Executive President EPN
Archive
Chronological
177178 Annex 51
Letter from Ing. Noel S. Salinas Alvarado Technical Manager,
National Port Authority to Cristóbal Sequeira Minister, Ministry for the
Environment and Natural Resources (MARENA)
Reference GT-0794-09-2006
25 September 2006
179180 Annex 51
[coat of arms]
Government of Nicaragua
National Port Authority
EPN
Managua, 25 September 2006
GT-0794-09-2006
Engineer
Cristóbal Sequeira
Minister of MARENA
Your Office
Dear Engineer Sequeira,
Enclosed with this letter I would like to send you the documents mentioned below, relating to
the project of IMPROVEMENT OF NAVEGATION ON THE SAN JUAN DE
NICARAGUA RIVER.
• A copy of the Design for the Improvement of Navigation in the San Juan River of
Nicaragua
• Three copies of the Environmental Impact Study of the San Juan de Nicaragua River
a) Environmental Impact Study
b) (EID) Environmental Impact Document
c) Annex to the Environmental Impact Study
That being all, I am pleased to send you my regards.
Sincerely,
[signature] [seal]
Ing. Noel S. Salinas Alvarado
Technical Manager
Cc: Executive Presidency EPN
Ing. Lilliam Osejo Deputy Minister of MARENA
Archive
Chronological
181182 Annex 52
Letter from Ing. Leonardo Zacarías Corea T. General Manager
Corea y Asociados S.A. (CORASCO) to Ing. Noel S. Salinas Alvarado
Technical Manager, National Port Authority
2 October 2006
183184 Annex 52
COREA Y ASOCIADOS S.A. (CORASCO)
Managua, 2 October 2006
Engineer
Noel Salinas
Technical Manager
National Port Authority
Your Offices
Dear Engineer Salinas,
On Thursday September 28, 2006 there was a work meeting in our offices with Marena
officials and staff of the interinstitutional commission (DGTA-MTI, Ineter, Marena and EPN)
that handles the dredging project in the San Juan de Nicaragua River. The list of attendees is
enclosed with this letter. Corasco was represented by all the consultants who worked on the
projects of Environmental Impact Study for the Improvement of Navigation on the San Juan
de Nicaragua River and on the project of Improvement of Navigation on the San Juan de
Nicaragua River, except Lic. David Ríos, who is out of the country.
A presentation was held on behalf of the E ngineers of the Project for Improvement of
Navigation on the San Juan de Nicaragua River (Design for the Dredging), by engineers Noel
Prado, Félix Romero andÁlvaro Flores Mendoza, who explained all the aspects of the design
of the navigation channel between Punta Petaca and San Juan de Nicaragua, a length of
approximately 42 kilometers.
Then each one of the specialists who carried out the environmental impact study, gave a
presentation on the aspects developed by their specialty.
Itis important tohighlight that the main focus ofthe questions raised by
Marenaofficialswasthat they wanteda guarantee that all discoveries made by the specialties
would be included in determining and evaluating the impacts, and in the respective
Environmental Management Plan, which is incorporated in the Final Report of the study ; the
Consultant still has to do a detailed review to ensure that the observations of the specialties
are included.
Marena officials proposed that the review by the Consultant should include the proposal of
solutions appropriate for the type of project that is being studied.
At the end we discussed visiting the project site to verify the results andconclusions of both
studies, especially regardingthe deposit sites. The Consultant explained that all the
information relating to the deposit sites is included in both studies such as: the dimensions of
each site, contour lines, storage capacity, the characteristics of each site, laboratory testing of
185Annex 52
soil with calculations of bearing capacity,granulometry and the classification of soils, and the
georeferencing for each one.
Given that non of the attendees had read the documents, it was decided to plan the visit to the
San Juan de Nicaragua river for the week of 9 to 13 october 2006, so that everyone could be
properly documented. The visit is expected to take 4 days, two days of travel and two days of
visiting the deposit sites. It was requested that EPN would send a copy of the studies to all the
members of the commission. (The DGTA-MTI official stated not to know said documents).
We are in the process of review ing the establishment and evalu ation of the impacts,
according to the suggestions and observations made during the work meeting, which we will
beincorporating into the final document where applicable and we will deliver it to EPN
Thursday, October 5. Any changes resulting from the revie w must be incorporated into the
final documents that Marena returned to EPN , so that they can be signed by the Consultants
and the legal representative of Corasco.
Awaiting your attention to this, I send my regards.
Sincerely,
[signature]
Ing. Leonardo Zacarías Corea T
General Manager
Corea y Asociados S.A. (CORASCO)
cc. Lic. CristóbalSequeira Minister of MARENA
Lic. Alejandro Fiallos Executive President of EPN
Ing. Lillian Osejo Deputy Minister MARENA
Archive
186 Annex 52
LIST OF ATTENDEES AT THE PRESENTATION
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY AND DESIGN OF THE DREDGING OF THE SAN JUAN RIVER
N o NAME AND SURNAMES OCCUPATION INSTITUTION / SPECIALTY SIGNATURE
01 Santiago Núñez S Ecologist CORASCO consultant
2 Alejandro J Cotto S Fisheries biologist Consultant / CORASCO
3 Yelba Flores Meza Geologist-hydrogeologist Consultant
4 Sylvia Ruth Hernández V Economics CORASCO consultant
5 Jorge Navas Morales Sociologist CORASCO consultant
6 Milton Medina Calero Mining and environmental engineer MARENA
7 Felix Romero Civil engineer CORASCO consultant
8 Sergio Cordonero González Hydrographer INETER
9 Francisco Mayorga T. Economist CORASCO consultant
10 María Lourdes Bravo S. Civil engineer EPN
11 Luis García '' '' DGTA
12 Milton G. Camacho Ecologist DGAP/MARENA
13 Maurico A. Molina Agronomist MARENA/SERBSEN
14 Alvaro Flores Mendoza Civil engineer CORASCO consultant
15 Mario Aguilar Leiva Agronomist CORASCO consultant
16 Elsa M Vivas Soto Agronomist MARENA
187188 Annex 53
Letter from Alejandro Fiallos Navarro Executive President,
National Port Authority to Mr. Tito Sequeira Minister,
Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources (MARENA),
Reference PE-AFN-0855-0-06
03 October 2006
189190 Annex 53
[coat of arms]
Government of Nicaragua
National Port Authority
EPN
PE-AFN-0855-0-06
Managua, 03 October 2006
Engineer
Tito Sequeira
Minister
MARENA
Your Office
Dear Engineer Sequeira,
As requested, in order to obtain the environmental permit fthe project IMPROVEMENT
OF NAVIGATION ON THE SAN JUAN DE NICARAGUA RIVER, I am sending you a list
of the professional staff that took part in elaborating the study, with their respective email
addresses and telephone numbers; I also attach an original lis t that contains the data,
specialty, Identity Card number, signature and photograph of these professionals who
elaborated said Study.
This document that we a re sending you in original and copy is being included along with
other observations in the final document in all its volumes that are already in our possession.
Thanking you for your kind attention to this, I send you my regards with the highest esteem
and consideration.
Sincerely,
[signature]
Alejandro Fiallos Navarro
Executive President
Cc: Technical Management
Archive
Chronological
GT-0823-10-2006
archive
191Annex 53
COREA Y ASOCIADOS S.A. (CORASCO)
Managua, 2 October 2006
Engineer
NOEL SALINAS ALVARADO
Technical Manager
National Port Authority (EPN)
Your Office
Dear Engineer,
As requested by you, I am sending attached to this letter, two (2) sheets with the information
of all professional staff that took part in gathering field information and in elaborating the
Environmental Impact Study for the improvement of navigation on the San Juan de
Nicaragua River.
That being all, please receive my regards.
Sincerely.
[signature]
Ing. Leonardo Zacarias Corea T.
General Manager
Corea y Asociados S.A. (CORASCO)
192 Annex 53
COREA Y ASOCIADOS S.A. (CORASCO)
PROFESSIONAL STAFF THAT TOOK PART IN ELABORATING THE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF
NAVEGATION ON THE SAN JUAN DE NICARAGUA RIVER
o
N Name and surnames Email Telephone
1 Lic. David Ríos Obando [email protected] 2498104 / 6989830
2 Lic. Francisco Mayorga [email protected] 6051951
3 Ing. Yelba Flores Meza [email protected] 2491432 / 8415370
4 Ing. Ramón Dávila López [email protected] 2774044
5 Lic. Alejandro Cotto [email protected] 2552635 / 8437502
6 Lic. Sylvia R. Hernández [email protected] 2333226 / 8812854
7 Lic. María A. Martínez [email protected] 8527155
8 Lic. Jorge Navas Morales [email protected] 8813289 / 8560631
9 Ing. América Coronado M. [email protected] 2632370
10 Ing. Mario Aguilar Leiva [email protected] 2685833 / 8126393
11 Ing. Leonel Corea Aguilar [email protected] 2685833 / 8897983
193Annex 53
PARTICIPATING SPECIALISTS
PROJECT OF IMPROVEMENT OF NAVEGATION ON THE SAN JUAN DE NICARAGUA RIVER
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY
N o Name and Occupation Specialty Study carried Period Identity Card Signature Photograph
Surname out No.
Lic. in Ecology and
Natural Resources.
MSc. in Environmental
Environmental
David Ríos Sciences, MSc. in Ecology and Impact Study, May- 126-060743-
1 Environmental Environment August
Obando Management, al Impact Biotic 2006 0003U
Specialist in Ecology Environment
and Environmental
Impact
Studies of
Francisco Lic. in Economics, Technical Economic May- 081-150644-
2 Mayorga MSc. in Transport August
Toruño Economics Economic Diagnostics 2006 0066X
Feasibility
Physical
Mining Engineer - Diagnostics -
Integrated
Yelba Flores Geologist. MSc. In Management Geology, May- 001-040466-
3 Mineralogical Hydrogeology, August 0021R
Meza Sciences, MSc. In of Hydrogeochemis 2006
Water Sciences Watersheds try and Water
Quality
Physical
Diagnostics -
Ramón Davila Hydrologist, Hydrology, May- 001-300858-
4 Agricultural engineer hydrogeologi August
Lopez st Dynamics of 2006 0024V
Segment to
Dredge
May-
5 Alejandro Lic. in Biology Fisheries Fisheries August 201-070460-
Cotto Sánchez Biology Biology Study 0004Q
2006
Lic. In Economics.
Sylvia Ruth MSc. In Perspectives Economic Economic May- 084-150756-
6 Hernández on Gender and Studies Diagnostics August 0003N
2006
Development
Maria May-
7 Antonieta Lic. in Biology Meteorology Climatic August 001-030665-
Martínez Specialist Characterization 2006 0020G
Specialist in
Researching
Lic. in Sociology, Lic. and May-
8 Jorge Navas in Psychology, performing Social August 001-201058-
Morales MSc. in Management Diagnostics 0005R
and Public Policy Socioeconom 2006
ic
Diagnostics
Geographic
América May-
9 Coronado Agronomist, Information Cartographic August 001-121162-
specializing in Forestry System Base in ARCGis 0057Q
Méndez Specialist 2006
Mario Aguilar Environment General May- 001-160464-
10 Leiva Agronomist al Specialist Coordination of August 0015W
the Study 2006
May-
Leonel Corea CAD Assistant 001-251084-
11 Aguilar Civil Engineer Specialist Engineer August 0030E
2006
194 Annex 54
Letter from Ing Alejandro Fiallos Navarro Executive President,
National Port Authority to Cristóbal Sequeira Minister,
Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources (MARENA)
5 October 2006
195196 Annex 54
[coat of arms]
Government of Nicaragua
National Port Authority
EPN
Managua, 5 October 2006
PE-AFN-868-10-06
Engineer
Cristóbal Sequeira
Minister
Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources
Your Office
Dear Engineer Sequeira,
I hereby submit the document of the Environmental Impact Study of the project for
Improvement of Navigation on the San Juan de Nicaragua River; one original and three
copies.
These documents have been reviewed and updated according to the recommendations of
the Interinstitutional Commission staff that handles this project, which were main a
working meeting with the Consultant just last week.
I also include a notarized record containing the list of professional staff that prepared the
Environmental Impact Study, with the i nformation required by MARENA and described
in the Terms of Reference provided for this study.
Thanking you for your kind attention to this, I take this opportunity to send you my
regards with consideration and respect.
Sincerely,
[signature] [seal]
Alejandro Fiallos Navarro
Executive President
Cc: Technical Management EPN
Directorate of Environmental Quality MARENA
Archive
Chronological
Gt-0834-10-2006
197Annex 54
REPORT
Regarding the Environmental Impact Study for the Project for improvement of navigation
on the Río San Juan de Nicaragua, the undersigned consultants hereby certify having
participated in the environmental impact study for the mentioned project and that we,
therefore, carr ied out the whole process of investigation, gathering of samples and
testing, and the pertinent tasks and conclusions presented in this environmental impact
document.
What follows is a brief list of participants in the study and the main environmental
impact projects in which the consultants participated. It is importanpoint out that all
projects that the consultants worked on are in the curriculum vitae t hey presented when
they applied to work on the study.
David Ríos Obando:
• Developed the environmental protection system for the municipality of La
Trinidad, FISE, 2005-2006.
• Carried out the environmental assessment in the design of twenty bridges along
the road (connecting) Siuna – Rosita – Puerto Cabezas. Corasco – MTI – PAST
Danida, 2005.
• Carried out the Environmental Impact Study for the road connecting Ticuantepe –
Masaya – Granada. MTI, 2004 – 2005.
• Inventory of the flora and fauna in Chiquilistagua. PROINTEC, 2004.
• Environmental supervision in the Upgrade and Rehabilitation Project for the road
between Muhan – Rama, TEC, 2001 – 2002.
• Consultant in the Environmental Impact Study for the Grand Pacific Resort
Tourism Project, 2000.
• Environmental restoration of the roads in the Chacocente protected area. MTI
1999.
198 REPORT
Regarding the Environmental Impact Study for the Project for improvement of navigation
on the Río San Juan de Nicaragua, the undersigned consultants hereby certify having
participated in the environmental impact study for the mentioned project and that we,
therefore, carr ied out the whole process of investigation, gathering of samples and
testing, and the pertinent tasks and conclusions presented in this environmental impact
document.
What follows is a brief list of participants in the study and the main environmental
impact projects in which the consultants participated. It is importanpoint out that all
projects that the consultants worked on are in the curriculum vitae t hey presented when
they applied to work on the study.
David Ríos Obando:
• Developed the environmental protection system for the municipality of La
Trinidad, FISE, 2005-2006.
• Carried out the environmental assessment in the design of twenty bridges along
the road (connecting) Siuna – Rosita – Puerto Cabezas. Corasco – MTI – PAST
Danida, 2005.
• Carried out the Environmental Impact Study for the road connecting Ticuantepe –
Masaya – Granada. MTI, 2004 – 2005.
• Inventory of the flora and fauna in Chiquilistagua. PROINTEC, 2004.
• Environmental supervision in the Upgrade and Rehabilitation Project for the road
between Muhan – Rama, TEC, 2001 – 2002.
• Consultant in the Environmental Impact Study for the Grand Pacific Resort
Tourism Project, 2000.
• Environmental restoration of the roads in the Chacocente protected area. MTI
1999.Annex 54
Ramón Dávila López:
• Water capacity of the Río Grande de Matagalpa basins, Basin 64, Basin 68, Río
Brito Basin.
• Hydrological study of Río Upa in La Verbena.
• Hydrological study of the Lago de Managua.
• Hydrological study of the Western Aquifer.
• Study on flooding with emphasis on territorial zoning in the Jinotega, Matagalpa,
and Nueva Segovia provinces.
• Municipal Study, Evaluation and Plan regarding possible natural disasters (such
as flooding and landslides) in the San Ramón and Matagalpa municipalities and
Segovia Province.
• Environmental Impact Study in the Río Ochomogo Basin.
Alejandro Cotto:
• Nicaragua FAO Office consultant for training on the codes of conduct required
for responsible fishery. Co-management of fishery resources and communication
issues in the development of the North Atlantic Region of Nicaragua. FAO, 2003
– 2005.
• Consultant regarding artisan fishery issues for the Spanish Agency for
International Cooperation (AECI). 2003.
• Specialist in fishery and aquiculture. General Directorate for the Biodiversity,
Policy and Regulations Unit, Ministry for the Environment and Natural
Resources. 1999 – 2002.
200 Annex 54
• Consultant as a biologist for the Executive Directorate of the MEDE Fishery
Division. (now the National Fishery and Aquiculture Administration; AdPesca, by
its Spanish acronym. 1996 – 1999.
• Biology expert. Research Department, Center for Research on Hydro -biological
Resources (CIRH, by its Spanish acronym) of MEDE PESCA.
• In charge of the Inspection Division. Center for Fishery Research (CIP, by its
Spanish acronym) of the Fishery Corporation of Nicaragua. 1991 – 1992.
Sylvia Ruth Hernández:
• Contracts and Purchasing Specialist. Supreme Court of Justice. Judicial
Consolidation and Access to Justice Program, P.O.[?]: 1074/SF-NI. CSJ-BID.
September 2003 to present.
• “Midlevel Qualitative Evaluation of the Program for Licensing and Local Offices
– Community Health Centers and Xochipilli Health Centers —in Nicaragua and
Honduras.” Marie Stopes International. September – October 2003.
• Eight-year evaluation of the Colchac Nac Luum Project (CNL, by its Spanish
acronym) in the towns of Yalambojoch, Yuxquéin and Aguacate de
Huehuetenando. ASDI FORUM SYD. Huehuetenando, Guatemala. May 2003.
• Member of policy development team for Institutional Gender Policy of the
Agricultural and Forestry Development Ministry (MAGFOR, by its Spanish
acronym) and Institutional Gender Strategy of MAGFOR. Arias Foundation for
Peace and Human Development. October 2002 – March 2003.
• Outside evaluator of the Juigalpa Community Education Project. FUNPRID.
SKN. January – February 2003.
201Annex 54
• Workshop: “How to implement the gender equality focus in rural development
projects.” Rural Development Institute of the Agro -industry Program for
Production Reactivation, IDR / BID. South Pacific Arid Zone Rural Development
Project (PROSESUR, by its Spanish acronym.) January 2003.
• Workshops: “Incorporation the gender equality focus at the municipal level in the
Municipalities of Matagalpa, San Ramón and Matiguás. Topics covered: Creating
Awareness regarding gender equality focus; Basic concepts; Evaluation of
Participation with a gender focus; Development of indicators and the participation
and empowerment process. Dutch Service for Development Cooperation (SNV).
December 2002. January 2003.
• Final Evaluation of the New Millennium Hope Project, of the Juigapa Chapter of
the “Los Pipitos” Association of Parents of Disabled Children. SKN. November –
December 2002.
Jorge Navas Morales:
• Nicaraguan Children’s Organizations Coordi nator (CODENI, by its Spanish
acronym). “Design for the Promotion of Children’s Participation by the
Municipal Commission on Childhood and Adolescence in 26 municipalities of
the country.” 2004.
• Canadian Agency for International Development (ACDI, by its Spanis h
acronym). Consultancy to the Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports
Directorate for P lanning and Policy regarding the development of a uniform
action plan for 2005 – 2008, and an Operational Action Plan 2005 (Strategic
Planning). 2004.
202 Annex 54
• Denmark Embassy. “Evaluation of Educational Options for D isabled Persons.”
2004.
• National Commission on Energy (CNE by its Spanish acronym). Social
Evaluation and Development Plan for the El Ayote and El Bote -Cua-Bocay
Communities, Project for Electricity Service in Isolated Rural Areas.”
• PLAN NICARAGUA: “Evaluation of the Pastries Project and Children’s Rights
in the Bluebird Home,” and development of the plan for Stage II of the project.
• Nicaraguan Children’s Organizations Coordinator (CODENI, by its Spanish
acronym). “Evaluation of participation regarding the situation of Children and
Adolescents in 25 municipalities of the country, including w orkshops for
developing skills amon g municipal personnel that work with children and
adolescents.” 2003.
América Coronado Méndez:
• Planning and implementation of Workshop for Training regarding ARC / VIEW
8.2 and ARCGIS 9X Programs. 2005.
• Planning and implementation of Workshop I for Training in the use of popular[?]
MapMarker in the development of Digital and GPS Cartography. 2000.
• Researcher on the different aspects of th e dry tropical f orest (inventory of fossil
trees and forestry). 1988 – 1990.
• Assistant, Technology Transfer Department of the “El Recreo” Experimental
Center. 1990 – 1992.
203Annex 54
I, t he undersigned Notary Public of the Republic of Nicaragua, residing at this
address and duly authorized by the Honorable Supreme Court of Justice to notarize
during the five-year period that concludes on the seventh day of July of the year two
thousand and nine, do hereby certify that the present photocopy was diligently
reviewed and that it is the same as the original version which consists of four pages
on regular paper.- And, in conformity with the Law on Photocopies, I hereby certify
the present in the City of Managua at twelve hours and five minutes on the fifth day
of October of the year two thousand and six.-
Managua, the fifth day of October of the year two thousand and six.-
[Signed and stamped with the
Notary Public stamp of Nelly Yadira Martínez Obando.]
Nelly Yadira Martínez Obando
Attorney and Notary Public
204 Annex 54
[A page containing a table regarding the Experts Participating in the Environmental
Impact Study for the Project for Improvement of navigation on the Río San Juan de
Nicaragua; with their F ull names, P rofession, Area of Expertise, Area of the
Environmental Impact Study covered, Dates of they carried out their particular study,
Identification Card Number, their Original signature, and their photograph.]
- - -
I, the undersigned Notary Public of the Republic of Nicaragua, residing at this address
and duly authorized by the Honorable Supreme Court of Justice to notarize during the
five-year period that concludes on the seventh day of July of the year two thousand and
nine, do hereby certify that the above signatures which say David Ríos Obando [s]
illegible.- Francisco Mayorga Toruño [s] illegible.- Yelba Flores Meza [s] illegible.-
Ramón Dávila López [s] illegible. - Alejandro Cotto Sánchez [s] illegible. - Jorge Navas
Morales [s] illegible.- América Coronado Méndez [s] illegible.- Leonel Corea Aguiar [s]
illegible.- were executed by the signers and that these signatures are those they use in all
the civilian and business affairs; and do certify this in the City of Managua at eleven
hours and thirty minutes of the fifth day of October of the year two thousand and six.-
Managua, fifth day of October of the year two thousand and six.-
[Signed and stamped
with the Notary Public stamp of Nelly Yadira Martínez Obando.]
Nelly Yadira Martínez Obando
Attorney and Notary Public
205206 Annex 55
Letter from Edda Martínez Director for Environmental Oversight
and Protection DGCA, MARENA to Mr. Jurgen Sengelman Director
DGTA/MTI, Reference DGCA-EM-C258
10 October 2006 (1)
Letter from Edda Martínez Director for Environmental Oversight
and Protection DGCA, MARENA to Mr. Luis Palacios Director
for Water Resources INETER, Reference DGCA-EM-C259
10 October 2006 (2)
Memorandum from Edda Martínez Director for Environmental Oversight
and Protection DGCA, MARENA to José Luis Galeno Director
SERB – SENMARENA, Reference DGCA-EM-M 396
10 October 2006 (3)
Memorandum from Edda Martínez Director for Environmental Oversight
and Protection DGCA, MARENA to Iván Ortega Director for
Protected Areas, MARENA, Reference DGCA-EM-M 397
10 October 2006 (4)
207208 Annex 55
Letter from Edda Martínez Director for Environmental Oversight
and Protection DGCA, MARENA to Mr. Jurgen Sengelman Director
DGTA/MTI, Reference DGCA-EM-C258
10 October 2006 (1)
REPUBLIC OF
NICARAGUA
CENTRAL AMERICA
[EMBLEM]
Government of Nicaragua
Ministry for the Environment
and Natural Resources General Directorate for
MARENA Environmental Protection
____________
[Signed Received
By Luis García
_11 Oct. 2006]_
Managua
10 October 2006
REF:DGCA – EM – C258
Mr. Jurgen Sengelman
Director DGTA/MTI
Dear Mr. Sengelman:
I am writing to inform you that we have received the Environmental Impact Study
for the Río San Juan Dredging Project to be executed in the Río San Juan Province.
Therefore, I am forwarding herewith a copy of the Final Environmental Impact
Study and Addenda for your comments and analysis. I should also express that we are
requesting your cooperation in order that we may receive your comments no lthan
Thursday, 26 October 2006.
Please forward your comments to Ms. Hilda Espinoza, General Director for
Environmental Protection – MARENA.
Km. 12.5 Carretera Norte, In front of the Duty Free Zones Corp.
Telef.: 263-2830 and 263-2832/Fax: 263-2354, 263-2620, and 233-1505
Post Office Box 5123, Managua, Nicaragua, C.A.
209Annex 55
With nothing further to add, I remain,
Cordially,
[Signed and sealed.]
Edda Martínez
Director for Environmental Oversight and Protection
DGCA, MARENA
cc: Hilda Espinoza, Dir. DGCA – MARENA
Luis García, DGTA - MTI
File 037-2006
210 Annex 55
Letter from Edda Martínez Director for Environmental Oversight
and Protection DGCA, MARENA to Mr. Luis Palacios Director
for Water Resources INETER, Reference DGCA-EM-C259
10 October 2006 (2)
REPUBLIC OF
NICARAGUA
CENTRAL AMERICA
[EMBLEM]
Government of Nicaragua
Ministry for the Environment
and Natural Resources General Directorate for
MARENA Environmental Protection
____________
[Stamped Received
By Juan R. Alemán
_16 Oct. 2006]_
____________
[Stamped Received
By the INETER
Administrative Office
___________
Managua
10 October 2006
REF:DGCA – EM – C259
Mr. Luis Palacios
Director for Water Resources
INETER
Dear Mr. Palacios:
I am writing to inform you that we have received the Environmental Impact Study
for the Río San Juan Dredging Project to be executed in the Río San Juan Province.
Therefore, I am forwarding herewith a copy of the Final Environmental Impact
Study and Addenda for your comments and analysis. I should also express that we are
requesting your cooperation in order that we may receive your comments no later than
Thursday, 26 October 2006.
Please forward your comments to Ms. Hilda Espinoza, General Director for
Environmental Protection – MARENA.
Km. 12.5 Carretera Norte, In front of the Duty Free Zones Corp.
Telef.: 263-2830 and 263-2832/Fax: 263-2354, 263-2620, and 233-1505
Post Office Box 5123, Managua, Nicaragua, C.A.
211Annex 55
With nothing further to add, I remain,
Cordially,
[Signed and sealed.]
Edda Martínez
Director for Environmental Oversight and Protection
cc: Hilda Espinoza, Dir. DGCA – MARENA
Sergio Cordonero, Water Resources – INETER
File 037-2006
212 Annex 55
Memorandum from Edda Martínez Director for Environmental Oversight
and Protection DGCA, MARENA to José Luis Galeno Director
SERB – SENMARENA, Reference DGCA-EM-M 396
10 October 2006 (3)
REPUBLIC OF
NICARAGUA
[EMBLEM]AMERICA
Government of Nicaragua
Ministry for the Environment
and Natural Resources
MARENA
____________
[Stamped Received
by Executive Secretary
Southeast Nicaragua
Biosphere Reserve
_11 Octobrer 2006]_
MEMORANDUM
REF: DGCA-EM - M 396
TO : José Luis Galeno
Director SERB – SEN
MARENA
FROM: Edda Martínez [Signed and sealed]
Director for Environment Oversight and Protection
DGCA - MARENA
DATE : 10 October 2006
REF : Forwarding Environmental Impact Study
I am writing to inform you that we have received the Environmental Impact Study
for the Río San Juan Dredging Project to be executed in the Río San Juan Province.
Therefore, I am forwarding herewith a copy of the Final Environmental Impact
Study and Addenda for your comments and anal ysis. I should also express that we are
requesting your cooperation in order that we may receive your comments no later than
Thursday, 26 October 2006.
Please forward your comments to Ms. Hilda Espinoza, General Director for
Environmental Protection – MARENA.
With nothing further to add, I greet you cordially.
cc: Hilda Espinoza, Dir. DGCA – MARENA
File 037-2006
213Annex 55
Memorandum from Edda Martínez Director for Environmental Oversight
and Protection DGCA, MARENA to Iván Ortega Director for
Protected Areas, MARENA, Reference DGCA-EM-M 397
10 October 2006 (4)
REPUBLIC OF
CENTRAL AMERICA
[EMBLEM]
Government of Nicaragua
Ministry for the Environment
and Natural Resources General Directorate for
MARENA Environmental Protection
____________
[Stamped Received, Reception
by MARENA, Protected Areas
_11 Oct. 2006]_
MEMORANDUM
REF: DGCA-EM – M 397
TO : Iván Ortega
Director for Protected Areas, MARENA
FROM: Edda Martínez [Signed and sealed]
Director for Environment Oversight and Protection
DGCA - MARENA
DATE : 10 October 2006
REF : Forwarding Environmental Impact Study
I am writing to inform you that we have received the Environmental Impact Study
for the Río San Juan Dredging Project to be executed in the Río San Juan Province.
Therefore, I am forwarding herewith a copy of the Final Environmental Impact
Study and Addenda for your comments and analysis. I should also express that we are
requesting your cooperation i n order that we may receive your comments no later than
Thursday, 26 October 2006.
Please forward your comments to Ms. Hilda Espinoza, General Director for
Environmental Protection – MARENA.
With nothing further to add, I greet you cordially.
cc: Hilda Espinoza, Dir. DGCA – MARENA
File 037-2006
214 Annex 56
Memorandum from Iván Ortega Gasteazoro, MARENA Director General for
Protected Areas to Hilda Espinoza Urbina, Director General of MARENA’s
Department of Environmental Quality
25 October 2006
215216 Annex 56
REPUBLIC OF
NICARAGUA
CENTRAL AMERICA
[EMBLEM
And slogan: Gobierno Bolaños¡Nueva Era!]
Government of Nicaragua
Ministry for the Environment
and Natural Resources
General Directorate for Protected Areas
____________
[Stamped Received, Reception, #3165
by MARENA, Environmental Control
_26 Oct. 2006]_
MEMORANDUM
TO : Ms. Hilda Espinoza
General Director for Environmental Protection
FROM: Iván Ortega Gasteazoro [Signed and sealed]
General Director for Protected Areas
REF : Forwarding comments and analysis on Environmental Impact Study
Dredging of Río San Juan
DATE : 25 October 2006
This is i n response to the Memo from Ms. Edda Martínez, Director for
Environmental Oversight and Protection, dated 10 October 2006, forwarding the
Environmental Impact Study regarding th e Río San Juan Dr edging Project in order that
this General Directorate for Protected Areas analyze it and make comments.
In this regard, I am glad to convey that in general this General Directorate finds
the Study is accep table. However, we recommend that the following changes be
incorporated during the approval process in order not to delay this initiative which is so
important to our national interest.
1. Regarding the Environmental Impact Evaluation:
In Section 4.2 Impact Eval uation and Analysis, symbols used in the Core Cause and
Effect, are confusing since they are not explained in the table. Box no. 4.1 uses five
symbols (G, M, P, T, t), however, combinations such as BT, PP, Gr, PD, etc., also
1
217Annex 56
appear in the table with no explanation of their meaning. The table should be practical
and easy to understand.
2. Regarding the Environmental Action Program
In practical terms, this is the most important program of the study, however, it is not
explained with the necessary depth.
It is important that the Environmental Plan Budget be guaranteed by the entity or
contractor responsible for implementing the project , to ensure its compliance. The
Environmental Plan cannot be implemented without a budget.
Regarding the Contingency Plan in the Event of Hydrocarbons Spills.
Although temporary due to the management imperatives of the Wildlife Refuge in the
Biosphere Reserve which is a RAMSAR Site that requires special treatment, t he
negative environmental impact in the event of hydrocarbon contamination is of huge
magnitude. For this reason the Contingency Plan and related activities should include
more details.
Regarding “the Contingency Plan in the Event of Hydrocarbons Spills,” in conformity
with the highest international standards , and national legislation and regulations, this
plan should detail procedures to be followed to avoid leaks and spills.
On Page 20, (2.2.4. Residue Management) the document states that MARENA will
specify the characteristics of the system and procedures for preventing leaks and
spills (of hydrocarbons). These specifications should conform to international
standards and regulations that have been established for the hydrocarbons industry
and to the technical rules applicable at ports and Nicaraguan fuel storage facilities.
On the other hand, it is important to emphasize that all procedures and their cost are
the responsibility of the contractor. In the project implementation budget the
contractor should guarantee the international standards required for the RAMSAR
Site Wildlife Refuge in the Biosphere Reserve.
Due to its international importance and international commitments regarding the area,
in the execution of this project, due consideration should be given to obtaining letters
of guarantee from the company executing the Environmental Action Program and the
Contingency Plan once it is more developed. This should be specified in the bidding
procedure as a requisite for work in the Protected Area.
Also, the contractor should demonstrate possession of the necessar y equipment and
trained personnel required in the event of fuel leaks and spills. Further, the contractor
should have its own Contingency Plan which should be approved by the authorities.
2
218 Annex 56
The document mentions that the “Normal Procedures for the Management of Fuel in
Water” will be carried out. In this regard, it is necessary for these procedure s to be
detailed or that the norms to be applied be specified.
During fuelling for the dredging, transport of fuel, etc., booms should be used around
the vessel.
Also, the dredging project and supporting vessels should be adequately supplied with
oil-absorbing sheets and absorbent pads in case of leaks or spills.
Permanent and temporary personnel working on the project should be adequately
trained in the use of these implements.
The contract should be specific regarding the necessary allocation of resources (a
helicopter) for action in the event of an emergency due to a hydrocarbon spill . Also,
the plan should identify in advance the company or entities with the helicopters and
include telephone numbers, addresses and contact persons.
The description of the project doe s not mention whether the dredging will also take
place at night. If that is the case, the pertinent mitigations measures should be in
place.
3. Regarding the Landscape Restoration Program
The Oversight and Monitoring Program is not detailed enough to allow for evaluation
of its effectiveness. It should be enhanced.
Material to be deposited in the dumps does not guarantee the growth of the replanted
vegetation. According to descriptions of th e material to be extracted it will basically
consist of a combination of sand and gravel with a low percentage of mud and clay
which will not allow for adequate propagation. Monitoring of the growth of replanted
vegetation up to the second month (60) days, which is contemplated in the program,
does not guarantee appropriate regeneration of vegetation. For this reason it is
suggested that monitoring take place for more than a semester and this should be
taken into account in the budget.
The origin of the replanted vegetation (greenhouses, etc.) should also specified.
The Landscape Restoration Program should end with a Summation Document
(Record) to be authenticated by the Environmental Supervisor who should be
designated by the Biosphere Reserve before the evaluation and approval of the
measures to be adopted and complied with.
4. Regarding Socio-economic matters
3
219Annex 56
It is important that the plan consider some recommendations for the prevention of
problems with the local residents and for developing a good relationship with them.
The speed at which associated vessels travel should be regulated in order to avoid
accidents caused by waves createdas the vessels move.
To avoid hunting, personnel of the dredging project should be oriented to avoid t he
purchase of wild animals to be used as mascots or food.
Information on the location and availability of dredging material should be made fully
available to the authorities and the local population.
The Contingency Plan should consider immediate communication with the residents
downstream who should be oriented to avoid bathing and taking water from the river
for the duration of an emergency.
Cordially,
cc: Ms. Edda Martínez, Director for Environmental Oversight and Protection
File
4
220 Annex 57
Letter from Noel S. Salinas Alvarado of EPN to Zacarías Corea
of CORASCO, Reference GT-0954-11-2006
23 November 2006
221222 Annex 57
REPUBLIC OF
NICARAGUA
CENTRAL AMERICA[EMBLEM]
Government of Nicaragua
Naitonal Ports Company EPN
____________
[Stamped Received, Reception
MARENA
_24 Nov. 2006]_
23 November 2006
GT-0954-11-2006
Engineer Zacarias Corea
General Manager
CORASCO
Dear Mr. Corea:
In a meeting held between your office and MARENA on 9 November 2006 it was
agreed that 15 November 2006 was the deadline for you to submit the Environmental
Action Plan for the Río San Juan Dedging Project, with the corrections requested by the
MARENA Directorate for Environmental Protection. However, to this date you have not
submitted these and thus the document has yet to be approved.
In view of the above we are requesting that at the latest Monday, 27 November
2006 you submit to the MARENA Directorate for Environmental Protection amendments
made to the document in order to finalize the Recommendations and Environmental
Permit that will make it possible to begin work on the project.
I hope to have your kind attention to this matter and I greet you,
Cordially,
[Signed and sealed.]
Engineer Noel S. Salinas Alvarado
Technical Manager
cc: Directorate for Environmental Protection, MARENA
Engineer María Lourdes Bravo
Chronological File
Teléf(s) Planta: 266-2059/ 266-3039/ 266-3274/ 266-2468/ Ext. (238))
Fax: 266-7376/ 266-7973 e-mail:[email protected]
223224 Annex 58
Work Report of Enrique Jardiel Arteaga Núñez, Second Chief of
the National Police, Río San Juan Delegation to Commissioner
José Miguel Pérez Solis, Head of Police Division
Río San Juan
20 June 2008
225226 Annex 58
Republic of Nicaragua
National Police
Río San Juan
San Carlos, 20 June 2008
Commissioner
José Miguel Pérez Solis
Head of Police Division
Río San Juan
RE: WORK REPORT
Dear Chief,
Yesterday we returned from the visit you ordered to the San Juan de Nicaragua
populace for supervision of police work and police surveillance of the coast and for
evaluation of navigational conditions along the Río San Juan and nearby springs.
We arrived in San Juan de Nicaragua on 12 June and immediat ely went to the
Chief of Police in the area, Captain Luis Armando González Vega , and informed him of
the purpose of our mission.
On the first day of work, 13 June 2008, we evaluated the relationship of the chief
with the local authorities, the local civilian judge, the Municipal Mayor, the Assistant
Municipal District Attorney, the Immigration Division, MARENA, MINED and SILAS,
etc. They all said they have good working relations and collaboration with the Chief of
National Police.
On 14 June 2008, w e had a work meeting with the staff and reviewed all aspects
of police discipline, administrative work, food and clothing needs , as well as compliance
with work orders you have communicated; and regarding work plans and proposed
objectives of the National Directorate.
On 15 June 2008, we made a review of the aquatic patrol sectors of the San Juan
River, using a boat and a 40 HP motor belonging to the division; we thus travelled
upriver to an area known as The Delta and observed that some parts of the river are rather
dry and difficult to navigate by the larger boats.
227Annex 58
On our return, we had the opportunity to enter through a caño that conducted us to
a lagoon known as Harbour Head. According to Captain González ’s explanation, that
caño and the lagoon as well as the swamp of the same name are Nicaraguan and periodic
surveillance must be carried out given that the area is besieged by Costa Rican poachers
who also invade the biological reserve in search of mountain hogs and other animals and
even wood which they then trade in their country.
It is advisable to bring this up in a future meeting with the Costa Rican authorities
so that they may also engage in surveillance on their border and avoid degradation of the
environment.
At the time we passed thr ough the area we did not observe any of these
clandestine hunters nor any Costa Rican guards or locals from the area.
On 16 June 2008 we visited the area known as Cangrejera where we have been
informed that the populace engages in drug dealing and where drug traffickers
presumably travel in search of refuge and places to sell drugs. Thus, the Chief of Police,
Captain González, ordered some vigilance and control in the area.
On 17 June 2008, we went through Río Indio and studied the area known as
Spanish Creek. It is known that some small drug dealers travel through this area and
collect the drugs at sea which they then transport to the interior of the country through
Río Indio and then through the Biological Reserve.
Having nothing further to report, I await your instructions and extend my
greetings.
Fraternally,
[S]
Commissioner
Enrique Jardiel Arteaga Núñez
Second Chief of the National Police
Río San Juan Delegation
228 Annex 59
Letter from EPN Executive President, Virgilio Silva Munguía to
Hilda Espinoza Urbina, Director General of MARENA’s Department
of Environmental Quality, Reference PE-VSM-0754-07-2008
15 July 2008
229230 Annex 59
[Logo]
Government of National Reconciliation
and Unity of Nicaragua [Logo National Ports Company
The People are the President! of Nicaragua
___________
Stamped received
16 July 2008
Public Information Service
MARENA
______________
Managua, 15 July 2008
PE-VSM-0754-07-2008
Ms. Hilda Espinoza, Esq.
Director for Environmental Protection
MARENA
Dear Ms. Espinoza:
In response to a request from the community of San Juan de Nicaragua, the
National Ports Company is proceeding to begin the preliminary act ivities to initiate clean
up of the course of the Río San Juan in the most critical areas. These activities that are
labor intensive.
Therefore, we are requesting environmental authorization for work which consists
of the clean up of inorganic waste. As part of this request we are submitting attached the
Report of Exploration of the Río San Juan and Observations Regarding its Clean Up and
Dredging for guaranteeing it navigation , written by our Company and which is in the
possession of your institution.
With nothing further to report, I thank you for your attention to this mattand I
greet you,
Cordially,
[Signed and sealed.]
Virgilio Silva Munguía
Executive President
cc: Juanita Argeñal – Minister, MARENA
MARENA Office, Río San Juan
Technical Div.
Chronological file: GT-LAQG-1106-07-08
231232 Annex 60
Memorandum from Julio C. Ordoñez L. to Executive President,
Virgilio Silva Munguía ( accompanying report)
13 August 2008
233234 Annex 60
[Logo]
Government of National Reconciliation
and Unity of Nicaragua
The People are the President!
___________
Signed received
18 August 2008
______________
M E M O R A N D U M
TO : MR. VIRGILIO SILVA M., ESQ., EXECUTIVE PRESIDENT
FROM : ENGINEER JULIO C. ORDOÑEZ, TECHNICAL ADVISER
REF : MARENA ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT
DATE : 13 AUGUST 2008
I am pleased to forward herewith a brief report regarding meetings held with
representatives of MARENA for the purpose of obtaining an Environmental Permit for
the Project for Improved Navigation on the Río San Juan.
As decided with MARENA the most important thing is to carry out a site visit so
that once this requisite has been met the above mentioned permit may be issued. Once the
EPN has the Administrative Resolution issuing the Permit, work can start on
development of the Project budget which would take into consideration all details and
requisites specified by Marena.
In this regard, I suggest that the Technical Management assign as soon as possible
the pertinent functionary to coordinate and carry out the visit to the project together with
functionaries of INETER, MTI, MARENA, and CORASCO, in order to comply with this
requisite for obtaining an Environmental Permit.
Cordially,
[Handwritten note: “Coordinate jointly with Mr. Ordoñez visit to San Juan de Nicaragua with these
institutions.)
cc: Engineer Lester A. Quinte
Engineer José Genet B.
File
235Annex 60
REPORT REGARDING PERMIT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY OF THE
RÍO SAN JUAN NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
This report has its origin in the letter dated 18 July 2008 addressed to Mr. Virgilio
Silva M., Esq. by Engineer Roberto Araquistaín Cisneros (Vice Minister) of the Ministry
for the Environment and Natural Resources (MARENA, by its Spanish acronym),
regarding the Environmental Permit that should be issued by said institution in order that
the Río San Navigation Improvement Project may be executed. The Executive President
of the EPN designated Engineer Julio C. Ordoñez to follow up on this correspondence.
The first meeting in MARENA was held on 6 August 2008 as requested by
Engineer Araquistaín who was accompanied by Ms. Hilda Espinosa, Esq., Director for
Environmental Protection of said institution . The EPN was accompanied by Engineer
Mario Aguilar of Corasco who acted as the representative of the consultant.
After reviewing the pertinent documentation prepared by the consult ing firm
Corea & Associates, S.A.) – CORASCO, MARENA concluded that it would approve all
the deposit sites for dredge residue material proposed by the consultant except those
located between the mouth of the Río San Juanillo and the Bocana (surge) of the Río
San Juan. In this regard, MARENA suggested that these sites could be substituted by the
space on the strip of land facing the San Juan de Nicaragua village. This strip of land
presently separates the Río Indio from the Caribbean Sea.
As a courtesy we were allowed access to the Draft of the Technical Order and
Administrative Decision on the case. This document was given to the repres entative of
the EPN who gave it to the consultant so he could review it and prepare for the following
meeting everything that is pertinent to his responsibilities.
Ms. Espinosa stated that in order to retake up the authorization of the
environmental permit applied for by the EPN it was necessary to at least carry out a visit
to the site of the project to confirm that conditions prevalent at the time of the study are
the same, besides verifying the site recommended by MARENA as a substitute for the
two deposit sites. Other details regarding issuance of the MARENA permit were to be
discussed at the next meeting which was to take place on 12 August 2008.
236 Annex 60
As proposed by MARENA, the second meeting took place on the morning of 12
August in the EPN offices. It was presided by EPN and attended by the following
persons:
Engineer Milton Medina Marena
Engineer Elsa Vivas Marena
Engineer Álvaro Flores Corasco
Engineer Mario Aguilar Corasco
Engineer Julio Ordoñez EPN
The meeting began with a request by the EPN t o know the minimal requisites it
should comply with in order to obtain as soon as possible the Marena Environmental
Permit for the Río San Navigation Improvement Project.
Two fundamental aspects discussed in the meeting as to the project were as
follows:
• Compliance with the Minimal Requisites for obtaining the Environmental
Permit.
• Other requisites to be complied with, as contained in the Draft
Administrative Resolution and which ar e applicable to the Project but
certainly should not delay issuance of the Environmental Permit.
Regarding the first point, it was agreed that a Commission would visit the site as a
requisite for issuance of the Environmental Study permit. The Commission’s members
were as follows:
Engineer Sergio Cordonero INETER
Engineer Luis García MTI (DGTA)
A Representative from the MARENA
Directorate for Environmental Protection MARENA
A Representative from the Dept. of Protected Areas MARENA
A Representative of the San Juan de Nicaragua Office MARENA
Two representatives CORASCO
237Annex 60
One representative EPN
One oceanographer, pending to be designated CORASCO
Marena would provide the boat for the trip.
As recommended by Marena, the EPN representative would be Engineer Alberta
Smith, from Technical Management, who during the time that the Study was taking place
had participated in several missions with the same purpose.
Engineer Roberto Araquistaín and Hilda Espinosa, Esq., requested that for the
purpose of facilitating this mission, EPN cover the costs of personnel and lo gistics
required by Marena, Ineter and DGTA, as has been the practice regarding this same
project. Once the visit had taken place and with the ensuing r ecommendations, it was
expected that Marena would be amenable to issuing the Environmental Permit for th e
Project.
The second point discussed was everything related to what the institution or
contractor in charge of the project should comply with, including the clarification of
certain concepts, for example, the protection of riverbanks, the use of wood was te as
protective structures and for social availability, the stripping and restoration of topsoil in
corresponding areas for the deposition of dredged material, reforestation, etc.
The Administrative Resolution Document contains innumerable rules that must be
complied during exe cution of the project. These rules in fact constitute a series of
technical specifications that must be observed in the contract for execution of the project.
The Administrative Resolution Document also suggests the costs involved.
It is good to remember that the Administrative Resolution specifies that in
estimating the project’s costs, contracting the services of a trained and experienced
professional Environmental Overseer must be taken into consideration.
Project costs estimates must also include an inspector designated by MARENA -
SERBSEN whose function will be to follow up on environmental protection throughout
work on the project. This is necessary due to the characteristics of the zone.
238 Annex 60
The entity responsible for the project must ensure vigilance of the residue deposit
sites in order that living quarters not be constructed there; it must also ensure the security
of industrial personnel.
Because the project will be developed in a border area, the EPN must coordinate
personnel’s security with other local institutions such as the Army, the Police, the
Municipal Government, etc.
Another point to be taken into account regarding issuance of the Environmental
Permit, is its renewal in the event that the project is not completed wi thin the 18 months
following its issuance.
239240 Annex 61
EPN Memorandum from Arosman Mendieta Jerez,
Supervising Engineer to Lester Quintero Gomez,
Technical Div. Manager, National Ports Company
(accompanying minutes), Reference IS-AMJ-12-09-08
23 September 2008
241242 Annex 61
[Logo] [Logo: of the National Ports Company]
Government of National Reconciliation
and Unity of Nicaragua
The People are the President!
___________
Stamped received
23 September 2008
National Ports Company
Technical Management
______________
M E M O R A N D U M
SUPERVISING ENGINEERS-TECHNICAL MANAGEMENT
IS-AMJ-12-09-08
TO : ENGINEER LESTER QUINTERO G.
Technical Div. Manager
FROM : ARCHITECT AROSMAN MENDIETA JEREZ
Supervising Engineer [Signed and sealed.]
REF : RÍO SAN JUAN VISIT REPORT
DATE : Tuesday, 23 September 2008
This is to hereby inform you that in compliancewith programmed visits by the
Institutional Commission (MARENA, INETER, MTI and EPN) as of 17 September 2008
with the representative of CORASCO who did the Environmental Impact Study , a trip
through the stretch of the Río San Juan between the Río Colorado Delta and the mouth of
the Río San Juan into the Caribbean Sea was carried out in order to do an onsite
inspection of sites selected for the dumping of residue dre dge material, which are crucial
according to MARENA.
We visited the following points:
Dumping site #0:
This is an island in front of a warehouse owned by Cdr. Edén Pastora; a possible site for
depositing residue dredge material from the Río San Juan jitney, if necessary.
[Logo and slogan:
In Unity the People Triunph.] National Ports Company
243Annex 61
The locations of Dumping sites no. 1 and 2 were changed due to their proximity to river
plant areas; river plants area prime source of food for manatees.
The locations of Dumping sites no. 3 and 4 were changed, as well as two sites on Isla
Salomón (island).
MARENA, INETER AND MTI request that EPN determine the type of dredging
equipment to be used as well as their technical specifications.
It was recommended that the volume of residue dredge material to be dumped in
Dumping sites no. 0, 1 and 2 be revised as a change in the dredging equipment may be
necessary.
The Inspection Team integrated by representatives of MARENA, INETER, MTI and
EPN will submit a Technical Report on the visit and its results will be incorporated in the
final resolution issued by the EPN as a request for the Environmental Permit.
cc: Chronological file
[Logo and slogan:
In Unity the People Triunph.] National Ports Company
244 Annex 61
[Handwritten]
Minutes of site visit to the Río San Juan Dredging Project.
Meeting in the San Carlos, Río San Juan offices of MARENA on Saturday, 20
September 2008 at 8:00am of the Institutional Commission integrated by MARENA,
EPN, MTI-DGTAN, INETER and CORASCO, as a consultant, after the Inspection Visit
to each of the locations referred to as dumping sites in the document entitled “Final
Report of the Environmental Impact Study for the Río San Juan Navigation Improvement
Project” and those added as per the letter addressed to Hilda Espinoza, Esq., by Engineer
Mario Aguilar (CORASCO) on 31 October 2006.
The following points were discussed:
1. Except dumping site locations no. 1 and 2, all dumping site locations indicated
in the document entitled “Final Report of the Environmental Impact Study for
the Río San Juan Improvement Project” are confirmed, as well as other
locations selected during the Inspection Visit of the Institutional Commission
which took place on 11-16 October 2006. During the visit dumping site
locations no. 1 and 2were relocated to the following coordinates: site no. 1,
206250E and 120920N; and site no. 2, 207205E and 1207483N.
2. The Commission recommends that the volume of residue dredge material to
be dumped in Dumping sites no. 1 and 2 be revised to clarify the dimensions
of these sites and their impact on the environment.
3. It was agreed that a meeting should be held on 26 September at 9:00am in the
EPN offices.
4. It was recommended that EPN state the dredging equipment and their
technical specifications.
5. The Inspection Team integrated by MARENA, INETER, and MTI wrote a
detailed Technical Report on the visit and its results will be included in the
Final Resolution issued by the EPN as the applicant for the Environmental
Permit.
Signed:
Milton Medina Caled MARENA [Signature]
Arosmán Mendieta Jerez EPN [Signature]
Félix Romero López EPN [Signature]
Luis García Olivares MTI-DGTA [Signature]
José [illegible..] P. INETER [Signature]
Elsa Vivas Soto MARENA [Signature]
Rigoberto López V. MARENA [Signature]
Mario Aguilar L. CORASCO [Signature]
245246 Annex 62
Letter from Engineer Leonardo Zacarias Corea T. General Manager
Corea & Associates (CORASCO) to Roberto Araquistaín
Vice Minister MARENA
21 October 2008
247248 Annex 62
[Co. Logo.]
COREA Y ASOCIADOS S.A. (CORASCO)
[Corea & Associates (Corasco, by its Spanish Acronym]
De estatua Montoya 1½ al Norte, Managua, Nicaragua – No. Ruc 060791-9534
Tel.2685833-5 and 266-8174 and266-8176, Fax 2685834, E- mail [email protected]
_______________
Stamped received
21 October..
_______________
Managua, 21 October 2008
Engineer
Roberto Araquistaín
Vice Minister
MARENA
Project: Río San Juan Improved
Navigation Project
Dear Mr. Araquistaín:
Our company, Corea & Associates (CORASCO) was responsible for the
Environmental Impact Study for the Río San Juan Improved Navigation Project. In the
context of our consulting collaboration with the National Ports Company (EPN) in the
site visit to dredge residue material dumping sites for their approval, we are forwarding
three (3) sets of two (2) pages each, containing:
1. Blueprint for the location of the dumping sites definitely decided upon, and;
2. Table with the coordinates of the location of the dumping sites.
As the company responsible for support to the EPN in final submission to
MARENA of the document which conduce to the issuance of the Environmental Permit
for the above mentioned project, we are thus complying with our responsibility.
With nothing further to inform on this matter, I reiterate that I am at your service.
Cordially,
[Signed and sealed.]
Engineer Leonardo Zacarias Corea T.
General Manager
Corea & Associates (CORASCO)
cc: Engineer José Santos Genet Director for Operations, EPN
Architect Lester Quintero G. Technical Manager, EPN
Ms. Hilda Espinoza, Esq. Director DGCA – MARENA
Engineer Milton Medina MARENA
File
249250 Annex 63
Letter from Carlos Robelo Raffone, Nicaraguan Ambassador in Geneva
and Permanent Representative of Nicaragua before the United Nations
and other International Organizations to Anada Tiéga, Ramsar Secretary
General, RAMSAR
30 November 2010
251252Annex 63
253254 Annex 64
Letter from Carlos Robelo Raffone, Nicaraguan Ambassador in Geneva
and Permanent Representative of Nicaragua before the United Nations
and other International Organizations to Anada Tiéga,
Ramsar Secretary General
2 December 2010
255256Annex 64
257258 Annex 65
Letter from Eng. LesterA. Quintero G. Technical Manager,
National PortAuthority to Ms. Hilda Espinoza Director General
Environmental Quality MARENA,
Reference GT-LACQG-0402-04-2011
5 April 2011
259260 Annex 65
Managua, April 5, 2011
GT-LACQG-0402-04-2011
Ms. Hilda Espinoza
Director General
Environmental Quality
MARENA
Hand delivered
Dear Ms. Espinosa:
We hereby inform you that as a result of the high cost of dredging forty- two kilometers and with
the understanding that the priority at this stage is to ensure navigability of smaller vessels, the
Office of the President of the Republichas decided to modify the dimensions and length of the
navigation channel along the stretch between Delta and San Juanillo to 32.77 kilometers, according
to the study carried out by consultant CORASCO S.A.
It should be noted that EPN shall perform the necessary topographic and bathymetric surveys to
quantify the volume and determine the definitive length.
Having no other matters of reference, I remain
Cordially yours,
/s/ Illegible
Eng. Lester A. Quintero G.
Technical Manager
Cc: Executive Presidency
General Manager
MARENA Minister
MARENA Deputy Minister
File
Chronological file
Nicaragua
en el ALBA
CRISTIANA,SOLIDARIA,
SOCIALISTA
261262 Annex 66
Letter from H.E. Mr. Jorge Urbina-Ortega, co-Agent of Costa Rica
to the Registrar of the ICJ, Reference ECRPB-025-12
3 July 2012
263264265266Annex 66
267Annex 66
268Annex 66
269Annex 66
270Annex 66
271Annex 66
272Annex 66
273Annex 66
274 Annex 67
Diplomatic Note from the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Nicaragua
to the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Costa Rica,
Reference MRE/DGAJ/127/03111
24 March 2011
275276 Annex 67
MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS
Managua, Nicaragua
Note No. MRE-DGAJ/127103111
The Department of International Legal Affairs, Sovereignty and Territory cordially salutes
the Honorable Foreign Policy Directorate General of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and
Worship of the Republic of Costa Rica and presents its most energetic protest for reiterated
violations to our air space, which have been acknowledged and publicized through
statements by the highest ranking authorities of the Government of Cos ta Rica and verified
by Nicaragua.
Such violations occurred in Nicaraguan territory on March 8, 9, 11, 14, 15, 16 and 19 of
2011 in the sectors of Harbor Head, Punta de Castilla and Delta, including the disputed
territory, and were carried out by Costa Ri can Cessna 172-type airplanes, Bell 206 and H-
500 MD helicopters, all of them belonging to the air surveillance service of the Ministry of
Public Security of that country.
Such actions constitute a violation and contempt of the order issued by the Interna tional
Court of Justice in its resolution of March 8, 2011 and tend to aggravate the situation in the
disputed territory.
The Republic of Nicaragua demands that facts like these not be repeated as such practices
do not contribute to improve neighbourly relations between our countries.
The Department of International Legal Affairs, Sovereignty and Territory of the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Nicaragua avails itself of this opportunity to present to
the Foreign Policy Directorate Ge neral of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Worship of
the Republic of Costa Rica the assurances of its distinguished consideration.
Managua, March 24, 2011
HONORABLE
FOREIGN POLICY DIRECTORATE GENERAL
Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Worship
Republic of Costa Rica
277278 Annex 68
Diplomatic Note from the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Costa Rica
to the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Nicaragua,
Reference DM-DVM-217-2011
30 March 2011
279280 Annex 68
T he Minister of Foreign Affairs and Worship
San Jose, March 30, 2011
DM-DVM-217-2011
Dear Mr. Minister:
I am pleased to salute Your Excellencyon the occasion of addressing you in relation
to the provisional measures ordered by the International Court of Justice on March 8, 2011.
In this regard, in paragraph 86 of the order issued, the Court indicated the following
provisional measure:
“Notwithstanding point (1) above, Costa Rica may dispatch civilian
personnel charged with t he protection of the environment to the disputed
territory, including the caño, but only in so far as it is necessary to avoid
irreparable prejudice being caused to the part of the wetland where that
territory is situated; Costa Rica shall consult with the Secretariat of the
Ramsar Convention in regard to these actions, give Nicaragua prior notice of
them and use its best endeavours to find common solutions with Nicaragua in
this respect.”
Accordingly, Costa Rica informs the Government of Nicaragua that, in coordination
with the Secretariat of the Ramsar Convention, a visit has been scheduled to the place of
the wetland indicated by the Court as the disputed territory – ex hypothesi- by a mission
comprised by technical staff from the Secretariat of the Ramsar Convention and Costa
Rican civil personnel charged with the protection of the environment. The purpose of the
aforesaid mission is to make a preliminary evaluation of the situation of the wetland, in
order to determine those actions as may be necess ary to avoid irreparable prejudice to that
part of the wetland.
His Excellency
Mr. Samuel Santos Lopez
Minister of Foreign Affairs
Republic of Nicaragua
281Annex 68
…No. 2
DM-DVM-217-2011
For that purpose, the aforesaid mission will be entering into the wetland on April 5
through 7, with the possibility of broadening the mission if, in consultation with the
Secretariat of the Ramsar Convention, such extension is deemed necessary. Further, t he
mission shall enter into the place in a leased civilian helicopter. Upon carrying out the
aforesaid evaluation and the respective consultations with the Secretariat of the Ramsar
Convention, the actions that are deemed necessary for the protection of the wetland in
accordance with the provisions set forth by the International Court of Justice will be
communicated in a timely manner.
Accept, Mr. Minister, the assurances of my distinguished consideration.
/s/ illegible
Carlos A. Roverssi Rojas
Minister ad interim
[Seal:] Minister of Foreign Affairs and Worship
San Jose, Costa Rica
282 Annex 69
Diplomatic Note from the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Nicaragua
to the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Costa Rica,
Reference MRE/DM/AJST/349/04/11
1 April 2011
283284 Annex 69
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Nicaragua
Managua, April 1, 2011
MRE/DM/AJST/349/04/11
His Highest Excellency Mr. Minister
I am writing to you, regarding the Note DM -DVM-217-2011 dated March 30, 2011, signed by
the Acting Minister Roverssi Carlos Rojas, in which is communicated to the Government of
Nicaragua, that in coordination with the Secretariat of the Ramsar Convention, a visit has been
scheduled from 5 to 7 April, to the territory that the International Court of Justice, has qualified
as a disputed territory in its order issued on March 8 this year.
In this regard, the Government of National Reconciliation and Unity of the Republic of
Nicaragua, as a faithful compliant of the decisions of that International Tribunal, and in
accordance with the provisions of the Charter of the United Nations, wishes to express to the
illustrious Government of Costa Rica the following:
1. The first provisional measure issued by the Cour t in paragraph 86 (1) of the Order , contains
the general rule governing the situation in the disputed area until the Court rules on the
merits. This rule mandates that:
"Each Party shall refrain from sending to, or maintaining in the disputed territory, including the
caño, any personnel civilian, police or security"
2. Paragraph 86 (2) contains a single and very limited exception to this general rule by stating
that:
"Notwithstanding point (1) above, Costa Rica may dispatch civilian personnel charge d with the
protection of the environment to the disputed territory, including the caño, but only in so far as
it is necessary to avoid irreparable prejudice being caused to that part the wetland where that
territory is situated: Costa Rica sh all consult with the Secretariat of the Ramsar Convention in
regard to these actions, give Nicaragua prior notice of them and use its best endeavours to find
common solutions with Nicaragua in this respect"
285Annex 69
Page / 2
MRE/DM/AJST/349/04/11
3. To use th is exception Costa Rica must have elements that indicate that there is danger of
irreparable damage being caused to the disputed territory, the Ramsar Secretariat should be
consulted in this regard and also consider that there is danger of irreparable harm and finally
giving notice to Nicaragu a but also "use its best endeavours to find common solutions with
Nicaragua in this regard"
4. In this regard, the dispatch of costa ricancivilian personnel can not be in order to make a
"preliminary assessment" of the wetland as expressed in your note , but as deemed necessary
to prevent irreparable harm. Nicaragua considers that since the date of the Order of the Co urt
being this less than a month ago, no irreparable harm was found or demonstrated in the
disputed area, the deployment of staff to the disputed area could only be justified if there was
a need that arose after the Order to make that visit.
5. In any case, the Ramsar authorities should make an assessment of the information on which
Costa Rica bases it request to seek entry to the disputed area. This information and RAMSAR ´s
assessment should be communicated to Nicaragua in order to comply with the mandate of the
Court that Costa Rica should use "its best endeavours to find common solutions with
Nicaragua"
6. In relation to RAMSAR, Nicaragua recalls that experts of that Organization visited Nicaragua
on March 12 to make an assessment of the wetlands. RAMSAR´s inspection did not include a
visit to the disputed area in order not to contravene the provisions of the Court, but i t did
include the areas in which Nicaragua has sovereignty not disputed by Costa Rica, including the
so-called Head Harbor Lagoon and con tours of the disputed area. Nicaragua has not received
any report from RAMSAR on its findings from the visit and thus express our observations, prior
to formalizing the report, so there is no information that would indicate a fact that could
motivate the need to coordinate action to ensure environmental protection and / or help to
avoid actions that cause irreparable damage to both sides from the disputed area.
7. The exception to the general rule prohibiting the entrance of the Parties to the disputed ar ea
is explained by the Court in paragraphs 79 and 80 of the Order. These paragraphs also refer and
quote verbatim the article 5 of the
286 Annex 69
Page / 3
MRE/DM/AJST/349/04/11
RAMSAR Convention which emphasizes the need for cooperation of the Parties in cases of
transnational wetlands.
8. Because of this, Nicaragua considers that in order to comply with the mandate of the Court
to notify Nicaragua and to make "its best endeavours to find common solutions", a simple
notifications 2 days prior to the visit, in which no explanation of the compelling reasons is given,
it´s not enough.
9. Nicaragua considers that the correct way to proceed is to receive from Costa Rica the reasons
for the visit and evaluation of those reasons by RAMSAR. We also consider necessary that the
assessment by RAMSAR takes into account the visit by its experts to Nicaragua on March 12 ,
that included the areas around the disputed area located in undisputed Nicaragua n territory,
including the Harbor Head Lagoon and the San Juan River that surround and feed the wetlands
in dispute.
10. Because of this, Nicaragua considers that the entrance to the disputed area on the terms set
by Costa Rica does not comply with the provisions of the Order of the Court of March 8, 2011.
11. Nicaragua considers that the most appropriate time to coordinate these activities would be
at the meeting scheduled for April 12 in which high authorities of both Parties will attend. To
this date we believe that there is sufficient time for Costa Rica and RAMSAR Author ities to
report the elements mentioned above.
I take this opportunity to express the assurances of my highest esteem and consideration.
(Signature)
Samuel Santos López
His Excellency
Rene Castro Salazar
Minister of Foreign Affairs
Republic of Costa Rica
287288 Annex 70
Diplomatic Note from the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Costa Rica
to the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Nicaragua,
Reference DM-225-11
4 April 2011
289290 Annex 70
THE FOREIGN MINISTER [OF COSTA RICA]
04 April 2011
DM-225-11
His Highest Excellency Mr. Minister
I refer to your note MRE/DM/AJST/349/04/11 of April 1, 2011, regarding the activities
coordinated by Costa Rica with the Ramsar Secretariat to be carried out in Humedal Caribe
Noreste, whose purpose is to evaluate the necessary measures to prevent irreversible damage to
the wetland.
Costa Rica acknowledges receipt of the aforementioned note, but rejects Nicaragua’s
interpretation of the provisional measures indicated by the International Court of Justice, as well
as the application of this interpretation to the activity duly reported by Costa Rica in its note-
DM-DVM-217-2011 dated March 30 2011. This activity will take place in full compliance with
the second provisional measure indicated by the International Court of Justice in its providence
of March 8, 2011. The existence of a risk of irreversible damage is the very reason why the Court
indicated such a measure. Civilian personnel responsible for the protection of the environment of
Costa Rica, in consultation with the technical mission of the Secretariat of the Ramsar
Convention, based on existing technical evidence, considers necessary an in situ visit for an
assessment of the situation of the wetland as a result of human activities conducted in the
northern area of Isla Portillos , in order to implement those actions necessary to avoid causing
irreparable damage to that part of the wetland. Consequently, Costa Rica reiterates in its entirety
the notice sent to Nicaragua in the note DVM-DM-217-2011 of March 30, 2011.
Costa Rica will inform Nicaragua in a timely manner the results of the visit and the
technical assessments resulting from it, and will advocate so that both countries take joint actions
required to protect both Humedal Caribe Noreste and the Humedal Refugio de Vida Silvestre Rio
San Juan, which coexist in area.
Also in the spirit of cooperation and good neighborliness required for the conduction of
our relations, and considering that the order of the International Court of Justice of March 8,
2011 calls on both countries to cooperate in the protection of the environment , Costa Rica
considers that there is no reason why the protective measures to be implemented in the Humedal
Caribe Noreste, to prevent irreparable damage, be a cause for the manifestations of disapproval
that have been made public by Nicaragua.
291Annex 70
Moreover, in the same spirit Costa Rica attaches to this note, the minutes of the meeting
held between the technical mission of the Secretariat of the Ramsar Convention, and officials of
the Ministry of Environment, Energy and Telecommunications, in charge of environmental
protection in Costa Rica.
Costa Rica takes note of the information mentioned in note MRE/DM/AJST/349/04/11on
the visit of a delegation of the Secretariat of the Ramsar Convention to the Nicaraguan area
surrounding Isla Portillos, including Los Portillos Lagoon. In accordance with A rticle 5 of the
abovementioned Convention and the providence issued by the Court on March 8, 2011, Costa
Rica expressed the wish that both parties share all actions necessary for the protection of
wetlands Costa Ricans and Nicaraguans in this area.
Receive, Your Excellency, the assurances of my highest consideration.
/Signed and sealed/
Carlos Roverssi Rojas
Minister a.i.
His Highest Excellency
Samuel Santos Lopez
Minister for Foreign Affairs
Republic of Nicaragua
292 Annex 71
Note from the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Nicaragua
to the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Costa Rica,
Reference MRE/DVM/AJST/500/11/11
29 November 2011
293294 Annex 71
Note from the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Nicaragua, to the Minister of Foreign
Affairs of Costa Rica, Ref: MRE/DVM/AJST/500/11/11, Managua, 29 November 2011.
Managua, 29 November 2011
MRE/DVM/AJST/500/11/11
Mr. Minister:
I have the honor to address you on the occasion of referring to aspects of the construction of a
120 kilometer road (approximately) which your Government is developing in the area
between Boca San Carlos and the Delta.
This road runs parallel to, and is a short distance from, the San Juan River of Nicaragua and
drains into the river. Besides destroying the flora and fauna of a very extensive zone of
common wetlands as a result of these activities, there is also the dumping of the residue
resulting from land removal and other forms of residue into our San Juan River.
These projects have been covered extensively by the press in your country. The 17 October
2011 edition of Costa Rica’s Diario La Nación points out that “The Government is
constructing a 120 kilometer road parallel t o the border with Nicaragua, in order to avoid the
use of the San Juan River by the population and the Police for their travel”. The article further
states that the route will extend to the area which was determined by the International Court
of Justice as an area in dispute by its 8 March 2011 order.
Also, the authorities of your country have confirmed the advanced stage of the project. In
statements to Costa Rican newspaper, La Prensa Libre, The Minister for Public Security,
Mr. Mario Zamora Cordera, rev ealed that the road parallel to the Río San Juan will be
completed in December 2011.
The Government of Nicaragua reminds the Government of Costa Rica that a project of this
nature should have an Environmental Impact Assessment due to their characteristics.
Furthermore, this study should have been sent to the Government of Nicaragua due to the
proximity to Nicaragua of this project and in conformity to International Law and the Order of
the International Court of Justice on 8 March 2011 and Article 5 of the RAMSAR
Convention, which stipulates that “in the case of a wetland extending over the territories of
more than one contracting party or where a water system is shared by Contracting Parties.
They shall at the same endeavor to coordinate and support present and future policies and
regulations concerning the conservation of wetlands and their flora and fauna”.
In this regard, the National Reconciliation and Unity Government of the Republic of
Nicaragua can only qualify this construction project as contrary t o the cited norms of
295Annex 71
International Law as well as paragraph 86, number (3) of the abovementioned International
Court of Justice Order.
Because of the above the Government of Nicaragua demands the immediate suspension of
these projects until their environmental impact can be assesed.
Mr. Minister, I extend the assurances of my distinguished consideration.
Manuel Coronel Kautz
Minister by Law
To H.E.Enrique Castillo Barrantes
Minister of Foreign Affairs
Republic of Costa Rica
296 Annex 72
Diplomatic note from the Minister of Foreign Affairs and Worship
of Costa Rica to the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Nicaragua,
Reference DM-AM-601-11
29 November 2011
297298 Annex 72
Note from the Minister of Foreign Affairs and Worship of Costa Rica to the Minister of
Foreign Affairs of Nicaragua, Ref: DM-AM-601-11, 29 November 2011.
The Minister for Foreign Relations and Cult
29 November 2011
DM-AM-601-11
His Excellency Mr. Minister:
I extend my greeting to your Excellency on the occasion of referring to statements of
high level authorities of the Government of Nicaragua. According to these statements a road
being constructed by Costa Rica in an area on the co mmon border with Nicaragua will
supposedly cause environmental damage to Nicaraguan territory.
In relation to this issue, the Government of Nicaragua knows very well that the
reasons Costa Rica has been obliged to develop this infrastructure project are r elated to
Nicaragua’s activities in the border area.
At the same time, Costa Rica considers that the project mentioned is not affecting
Nicaraguan territory. Nonetheless, in the spirit of a good neighbor policy and environmental
protection, as well as in compliance with pertinent agreements on this matter, the Government
of Costa Rica is willing to hear Nicaragua’s concerns regarding the construction of this road.
In this regard, my Government invites the Government of Nicaragua to present
formally the re asons for which it considers that there may be environmental damage or
damage to Nicaragua’s interests. For this purpose, Costa Rica requests to receive serious and
objective scientific information that proves Nicaragua’s allegation. In the same spirit, my
country expects the same attitude from the Government of Nicaragua regarding projects that
may affect Costa Rican territory.
Finally and also in the context of the facilitation process led by the Governments of
Guatemala and Mexico, Costa Rica is in the best disposition to accept the participation of
both States in the discussion and analysis of common environmental issues.
Mr. Minister, please receive the assurances of my consideration.
/s/ [seal]
Enrique Castillo Barrantes
H.E.Samuel Santos López
Minister of Foreign Affairs
Republic of Nicaragua
[Stamped:]
Nicaragua Embassy
San José, Costa Rica
Office of the Ambassador
29/11/11, 10
Received by: /s/ [illegible]
299300 Annex 73
Note from the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Nicaragua to
the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Costa Rica,
Reference MRE/DVS/VJW/0685/12/11
10 December 2011
301302 Annex 73
Note from the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Nicaragua, to the Minister of Foreign
Affairs of Costa Rica, Ref: MRE/DVS/VJW/0685/12/11, Managua, 10 December, 2011.
MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS
th
Managua, 10 December 2011
MRE/DVS/VJW/0685/12/11
Dear Mr. Minister:
The National Reconciliation and Unity Government regrets to communicate that, in relation to
th
your note DM -AM-601-11 dated 29 November 2011, considers inappropriate and
inadmissible to request Nicaragua to point out the damages that may result f rom the project
that your government is constructing in the right bank of the San Juan of Nicaragua River.
The Government of Nicaragua considers that such expression is the result of a wrong
interpretation of the obligation of your distinguished government to present to Nicaragua,
prior to the commencement of the road, the Environmental Impact Assessment and the
Environmental Management Plan, both of them being a fundamental requisite to carry out a
project of such a magnitude.
Trying to invert the logic in regard to the obligations of Costa Rica implies not assuming the
commitments with mother nature, International Law and the bilateral and multilateral
Conventions and Treaties that your government has subscribe in defense of the environment
and biodiversity, among which we can mention the Regional Convention for the Management
and Conservation of the Natural Forest Ecosystems and the development of forest plantations
signed in Guatemala on 29 thOctober 1993, Stockholm Declaration, Rio Declaration, Agenda
21 and the February 2, 1971 Convention on Wetlands of International Importance especially
as Waterfowl Habitat (RAMSAR), whose Article 5 was highlighted in paragraph 79 of the
Order of the International Court of Justice dated March 8 2011: “ Article 5.- The contracting
parties shall consult with each other about implementing obligations arising from the
Convention especially in the case of a wetland extending over the territories of more than one
Contracting Party or where a water system is shared by Contracting Parties. They shall at the
same time endeavor to coordinate and support present and future policies and regulations
concerning the conservation of wetlands and their flora and fauna”.
The government of Costa Rica far from informing its own people and Nicaragua about the
project, has kept them hidden. Furthermore, high ranking people of the government have
made misleading statements in the media by affirming that the project had been ceased.
Independently of the above mentioned, it is evident that the construction of the road seriously
affects the environment and the rights of Nicaragua. If the project is not ceased it would have
irreversible and transcendental ecological and environmental consequences.
Among the many consequences that can be highlighted are the following:
303Annex 73
1- Dumping of trees and soil along the route of the road into the river flow, difficulting
and risking the navigation in its waters, over which Nicaragua has the dominion and
sovereign jurisdiction based on the Treaty of 15 thApril 1858 and the Cleveland Award
nd
of 22 March 1888.
2- Removal and sedimentation of fragile soils resulting in an increased and excessive
sedimentation of the waters of the Nicaraguan river.
3- Impact over the hydrological resources, particularly affecting fishing in the river
because of the changes in the quality of the water.
4- Destruction of the natural habitat of the bank by removing the immediate vegetation to
the river flow for the construction of the road, affecting the tree diversity around it.
5- Interception of the natural flow of the waters that flow through the south basin to the
San Juan River by modifying the drainage of the surrounding wetlands at the lower
San Juan and its delta.
6- Erosion of the soil banks in places where a certain slope exists and resulting in the
sedimentation of clay soils to the San Juan of Nicaragua River.
7- Decrease or alteration of the aquatic life due to the water cloudiness resulting from the
sediments of the road construction.
8- Destruction of the inherent scenic values and eco-tourism potential of the river course.
I point out that the above list does not exhausts all the consequences and responsibilities of
Costa Rica related to the execution of this project, including the incursions in Nicaraguan
territory and the violations of the demarcation monuments.
The obligation of Costa Rica to inform Nicaragua about the Environmental Impact
Assessment prior to the commencement of the project cannot be reinstated by calling upon
facilitators. Nicaragua cannot accept anything less than the ceasing of the project until it has
had the chance to receive and analyze the Environmental Impact Assessment on the project.
I take this opportunity to express the assurances of my consideration.
His Excellency Enrique Castillo
Minister of Foreign Affairs and Cult
Republic of Costa Rica
Seal
Embassy of Costa Rica
Managua, Nicaragua
Date: 10/12/2011
Time: 7:05 pm
Received by: Edwin Arias
304 Annex 74
Diplomatic note from the Minister of Foreign Affairs and Worship of
Costa Rica to the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Nicaragua,
Reference DVM-AM-286-11
20 December 2011
305306 Annex 74
Seal of the Republic of Costa Rica
The Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs and Cult
December 20, 2011
DVM-AM-286-11
Honorable Minister:
I greet Your Excellency on occasion of referring to notes MRE/DVM/AJST/500/11/14 dated
November 29 and MRE/DVS/VJW0685/12/11 dated December 10, both of the current year.
In reference to both notes, the Government of Costa Rica rejects the affirmations tha t
construction of a dirt road in the northern area of Costa Rica “severely affects the environment
and the rights of Nicaragua”. The alleged “consequences” of this work, enumerated by the
Government of Nicaragua, is in no way evidence that it caused damage s to Nicaragua, and it
therefore rejects the alleged protest. Costa Rica is still waiting for Nicaragua to contribute strong
evidence as to the location of the irreversible damages caused to the San Juan River alleged by
Nicaragua.
It is contradictory that Nicaragua should demand from Costa Rica the “presentation to Nicaragua
prior to beginning road construction, of the Environmental Impact Study and the Environmental
Management Plan”. Nicaragua itself has systematically refuse s to provide information to C osta
Rica and to submit the corresponding studies for all of the works that it develops in the border
area, including dre dging of the San Juan River. These works also include stream cutting and
deviation of the natural riverbed. Allow me to remind Nicaragu a that it continues dredging works
in the San Juan River, which according to Nicaragua’s own studies, suppose the removal of more
than three million cubic meters of sediment . All of these sediments currently dumped in the San
Juan River Wildlife Refuge wet lands, a Ramsar Convention Site, in addition to the sediments
already dumped in the North Caribbean Wetlands of Costa Rica, also a Ramsar Site.
Likewise, I recall that Nicaragua has also built an airport with an extension of two kilometers
directly in the same San Juan River Wildlife Refuge Wetlands, in an area adjacent to Costa Rican
territory and the San Juan del Norte Bay, joint property with Costa Rica. Nicaragua did not fulfill its
international obligation to serve notice to the Secretariat of the Ram sar Convention, much less to
inform Costa Rica, about either of the works, neither dredging with the subsequent dumping of
sediments into the wetlands or the airport construction.
Nicaragua also builds a large -scale bridge in the San Juan River and announ ced construction of a
dam that in the words of President Ortega himself will have devastating effects for the
environment in the region. Costa Rica neither received notice about any type of studies for these
works.
The purpose of the works carried out by Costa Rica, under the protection of a National Emergency
Decree, is to safeguard the integrity of its territory and bring development to that area of the
307Annex 74
country. These works, undertaken with minimum possible impacts, are a consequence of the
serious actions that Nicaragua made and continues to make in the borderline area . This includes
the continuous defilementof the Ruling that Dictates Interim Measures issued by the International
Court of Justice on March 8, 2011, by sponsoring the constant presence of members of the
Sandinista Youth Organization in Costa Rican territory in the northern sector of Portillos Island,
known as Aragon Farm. All of the above, without mentioning the devastation of several hectares
of primary forest, as well as construction of an artificial canal in the North Caribbean Wetlands, in
Costa Rican Territory.
Despite evidence that the reasons that move Nicaragua to launch the aggressive campaign against
Costa Rica are not environmental ; nevertheless, Costa Rica maintains its willingn ess to listen to
any legitimate concern with due backup. In this sense, and given that Nicaragua alleges that this
could cause damages to the San Juan River, Costa Rica requests immediate remittance of the
existing studies about such river. Costa Rica espe cially request information relating to historical
records on turbidity in its waters, chemical composition, historical sediment load, and all scientific
data pertinent to the assessment of the river´s condition, and detect any possible affectations.
Lastly, and given its relation with the Nicaraguan policy to disavow the established boundaries and
threatening Costa Rican national security, the Government of Costa Rica avails itself of this
occasion to introduce its most energetic protest for the events that took place yesterday, Monday
December 29. Given that, a group of about 15 Nicaraguan soldiers penetrated approximately on
kilometer into Costa Rican territory in the Punta Castilla sector, uttering threats against officials of
the Costa Rican Public Forces in the area. This documented event is an unacceptable violation of
Costa Rican sovereignty. This confirms that Costa Rica has sufficient reasons to take measures
provided by international law to protect its national territory, as well as those civil works that
ensure protection of its territorial integrity . It also includes those civil works that ensure full
exercise of its territorial sovereignty and monitor actions carried out by foreign forces in our
country. A llow us to demonstrate those violati ons before the respective international
organizations.
Receive, Honorable Minister, the assurances of my consideration
Illegible Signature,
Carlos A. Rovers Rojas,
Deputy Minister
Stamped Seal: Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Office of the Deputy Minister
San Jose, Costa Rica
Excellency
Mr. Samuel Santos Lopez
Minister of Foreign Affairs
Republic of Nicaragua
English: NCM
308 Annex 75
Diplomatic Note from the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Costa Rica to
the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Nicaragua,
Reference DM-AM-046-12
27 January 2012
309310 Annex 75
T he Minister of Foreign Affairs and Worship
January 27, 2012
DM-AM-046-12
Mr. Minister:
I salute your Excellency on the occasion of addressing you in reference to the
provisional measures ordered by the International Court of Justice on March 8, 2011,
specifically relating to sending civilian personnel charged with the protection of the
environment to the “disputed territory” – ex hypothesi - in order to avoid irreparable
prejudice caused to that part of the Northeast Caribbean Wetland.
According to the work plan presented to, and approved by the Ramsar Convention
Secretariat through letter dated November 7, 2011, Costa Rica will be making a new
technical visit to the aforesaid territory at the beginning of next week for purposes of
complying with the provisions of the court order.
Both the Ramsar Convention Secretariat and the International Court of Justice are
being informed about this visit.
Accept, Sir, the assurances of my consideration.
/s/ illegible
Carlos A. Roverssi Rojas
Minister ad interim
[Seal:]San Jose, Costa RicaAffairs and Worship
His Excellency
Mr. Samuel Santos Lopez
Minister of Foreign Affairs
Republic of Nicaragua
311312 Annex 76
Diplomatic Note from the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Nicaragua to
the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Costa Rica,
Reference MRE/DM-AJ/116/02/12
13 February 2012
313314 Annex 76
The Minister of Foreign Affairs
Managua, February 13, 2012
MRE/DM-AJ/116/02/12
Mr. Minister:
I am writing to you on this occasion to let you know that this
Ministry has been duly informed of violations of Nicaraguan air
space in the last months.
In this regard, the Government of Reconciliation and National Unity
of the Republic of Nicaragua has refrained from sending formal
protest notes to the Republic of Costa Rica to avoid situations that
could cause tension in the relations between both countries, and
striving to achieve mechanisms t hat promote the adoption of
mutually agreed solutions, it has been pro posing dialogue
mechanisms between Nicaragua and Costa Rica before the national
and international public opinion. In this regard, diverse m edia have
informed about the proposals made by President Daniel Ortega
Saavedra in 2011 and duringthis year.
In accordance with the information obtained and verified, Cessna -
type air planes flying the Costa Rican flag have flown over
Nicaragua’s air space on various occasions during this year.
According to this information, this type of violation acts have
occurred, inter alia, on the June 17, 22 and 29, July 21 and 25, August
4, 8, 19 and 27, September 3, 7, 9, 22 and 23, October 22 and
November 3, all in 2011, and on January 24 of this year, and it should
be added that 15 illegal overflights were reported during the period
comprised between the months of August and December of 2010, as
well as 17 illegal overflights during the period comprised between
January and May of two thousand eleven.
[Seal:] MINISTER OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS
Managua
REPUBLIC OF NICARAGUA
CENTRAL AMERICA
/s/ illegible /s/ illegible
His Excellency
Mr. Jose Enrique Castillo Barrantes
Minister for Foreign Affairs and Worship
Republic of Costa Rica
315Annex 76
Page N° 2
MRE/DM-AJ/116/02/12
February 13, 2012
The aforesaid overflights have not counted with the authorization of
the competent Nicaraguan authorities. I wish to inform you that
among the places illegally flown over in the Republic of Nicaragua
are Harbor Head Lagoon and San Juan de Nicaragua River.
In second place, on behalf of the Government of Reconciliation and
National Unity of the Republic of Nicaragua, I wish to express that
this Ministry has been informed about the NOTAM issued by Mr.
Jorge Fernandez, Director General of Costa Rica’s Civil Aeronautics
Directorate General, including location coordinates found in
Nicaraguan territory and air space, to name a few , latitude
10°55.00'N and long itude 083°40.00 'W, as well as the line that
unites the points between latitude 10 °51.64'N and longitude
083°40.12'W and latitude 10°55.15' and longitude 083°39.86'W.
Finally, my Government has seen with great surprise the statements
made by Mr. Luis Alberto Rojas Bolaños, Director of the Tortuguero
Conservation Area, published in the mass media, in which he affirms
that overflights are carried out in the disputed terri tory and along
the border together with that country’s Public Force. In this respect,
such affirmations show that fail ing to process and obtain the
respective “overflight and/or landing” permits violates national
sovereignty, international law, the order i ssued by the International
Court of Justice on March 8, 2011, and provisions of A rticles 3, 11
and 12 of the Chicago Convention.
Based on the foregoing, I present the most energetic protest and
request your Government take the necessary measures so that acts
of this nature are not repeated.
My Government considers that these facts do not contribute to the
compliance of your Government with the provisional measure
ordered by the International Court of Justice on March 8 last, so as
not to aggravate or extend the dispute before the Court, or mak e it
more difficult to resolve.
I avail myself of this opportunity to assur e Your Excellency of my
highest consideration.
/s/ illegible
Samuel Santos Lopez
[Seal:] MINISTER OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS
Managua
REPUBLIC OF NICARAGUA
CENTRAL AMERICA
316 Annex 77
Diplomatic Note from the Minister of ForeignAffairs and Worship of
Costa Rica to the Minister of ForeignAffairs of Nicaragua,
Reference DM-AM-045-12,
26 January 2012 (1)
Diplomatic Note from the Minister of ForeignAffairs of Nicaragua
to the Minister of ForeignAffairs and Worship of Costa Rica
Reference MRE/DM-AJ/118/02/12,
13 February 2012 (2)
Diplomatic Note from the Minister of ForeignAffairs and Worship of
Costa Rica to the Minister of ForeignAffairs of Nicaragua,
Reference DM-AM-144-12,
14 March 2012 (3)
317318 Annex 77
Diplomatic Note from the Minister of ForeignAffairs and Worship of
Costa Rica to the Minister of ForeignAffairs of Nicaragua,
Reference DM-AM-045-12,
26 January 2012 (1)
The Minister of Foreign Affairs and Worship
26 January 2012
DM-AM-045-12
Dear Excellencythe Minister:
I am greeting your Excellency with reference to your note DVM-AM-286-11, dated
20 December 2011.
In referenced note my government requested your s to send all the existing studies
about the San Juan River, especially those having to do with the historical records of the
turbidity of its waters, the chemical composition, the historical sediment load, and all
scientific data that is relevant for thevaluation of the condition of the river, in order to
scientifically assess its situation
In the same note Nicaragua was requested to send all studies about the impact on the
San Juan River caused by the construction of a bridge, in a sector close to San Carlos de
Nicaragua, to be able to determine joint courses of action, should they be necessary.
A request was also made for technical and environmental information about the
construction of an airport near th e San Juan del Norte Bay, in the Río San Juan wetland
wildlife refuge, to be able to determine if this bay, of which Costa Rica is co -owner, is being
impacted.
Given that Costa Rica has not received any information to this respect, I reitera te
again our interest in receiving it promptly.
Please accept the assurances of my consideration.
[firma] [sello]
Carlos A. Roverssi Rojas
Minister a.i.
His Excellency
Samuel Santos López
Minister of Foreign Affairs
Republic of Nicaragua
319Annex 77
Diplomatic Note from the Minister of ForeignAffairs of Nicaragua
to the Minister of ForeignAffairs and Worship of Costa Rica
Reference MRE/DM-AJ/118/02/12,
13 February 2012 (2)
The Minister of Foreign Affairs
Managua, 13 February 2012
MRE/DM-AJ/118/02/12
Dear Minister,
I am writing to you with reference to your Notes DV M-AM-286-11 dated 20
December 2011 and DM-AN-045-12 dated 26 January of this year, in which
you wish to refer among other things, to aspects of sovereignty and the
environment.
With regards to the reques t for studies about the impact on the
environment that the 160 kilometer long road that your country is building
parallel to the San J uan River will cause; Nicaragua is surprised that Costa
Rica is unaware of the obligations for burden of proof provided under
International Law, as conventions relative to the environment are,
particularly de RAMSAR Convention.
For this reason, in regard to your specific request for technical documents,
it was up to your government to present them even before starting the
construction work.
It surprises my government that the Republic of Costa Rica continues to
emphasize supposed damages caused by Nicaragua’s cleaning of the San
Juan River. Your government presented this issue to the International Court
of Justice during the Public Hearings that took place in January 2011,
without providing any supporting evidence as was expressed by the Court in
its Order of 8 March 2011, paragraph 82 that states:
“82. Whereas it cannot be concluded at this stage from the
evidence adduced by the Parties that the dredging of the San
Juan river is creating a risk of irreparable prejudice to Costa
Rica’s environment or to the flow of the Colorado river;
whereas nor has it been shown that, even if there were such
a risk of prejudice to rights Costa Rica claims in the present
case, the risk would be imminent; and whereas the Court
concludes from the foregoing that in the circumstances of the
case as they now stand the second provisional measure
requested by Costa Rica should not be indicated”
His Excellency
José Enrique Castillo Barrantes
Minister of Foreign Affairs and Worship [signature] [seal]
Republic of Costa Rica
Your office
320 Annex 77
Page 2
MRE/DM-AJ/118/02/12
13 February 2012
A contrario sensu, the road that Costa Rica is constructing parallel to the
River is causing damages to navigation and the environment by spilling
sediment into the riverbed, and the small handi craft cleaning equipment
hardly competes with the more than seven hundred pieces of equipment
and machinery of your country that are destroying the soil, the vegetation
and the water sources that feed the San Juan River.
As to your reference to the construction of an airport in an area “adjacent”
to Costa Rican territory and of a major bridge over the San Juan River, I
would like to state that both projects were properly open to public tendering
and have received advice, supervision and financing of International
Organizations and donating countries respectively. For the airport I would
like to mention the International Civil Aviation Organization and the Inter-
American Development Bank , and for the bridge , funds of the Japanese
Cooperation, and it has even been shown that this bridge would benefit
both countries.
Prior to their approval, t he consulting and donating organizations and
countries have seen the required documentation, about technical matters
and matters relating to the protection of the environment among other
things, unlike the pro cedure for the c onstruction of a road parellel to the
San Juan River by your country, which was carried out without tendering
and without fulfill ing basic requirements like the environmental impact
study and action plan.
Both projects are far away from Costa Rican territory and not at a few
meters distance like the mentioned road that Costa Rica is building. As
regards your allusion to the fact that the airport is located adjacent to what
you identify as “San Juan Bay, jointly owned by Costa Rica”, I should clarify
to you that this bay ceased to exist many years ago, hence so did any right
that Costa Rica can claim over it.
About the announcement of the construction of a dam; that is a project for
which the respective studies of feasibility are still being conducted, and it
will be carried out with all the requirements imposed by International Law.
321Annex 77
Page 3
MRE/DM-AJ/118/02/12
13 February 2012
As regards to what is stated in the last paragraph of Note DVM -AM-286-11
concerning the supposed incursion of 15 soldiers of the Nicaraguan Army on
Costa Rican territory in the Punta de Castilla sector on 19December 2011,
on the ground of whi ch, unsubsta ntiatedly, you attempt to justify the
construction of a road parallel to the San Juan River, to which I have
referenced in Notes MRE/DVM/AJST/500/11/11 and MRE/DV S/VJW/
0685/12/11 dated 29 November 2011 and 10 December 2011 respectively;
after investigati ng the case , in the name of the Government of
Reconciliation and National Unity, I strongly reject such a claim, because
this never happened.
The only incursions known to my country are the ones carried out by
officers and officials of your Government on N icaraguan territory, by
overflights as we have indicated in Note MRE/DM-AJ/116/02/12 as well as
by individuals coming from your country to prey on the Nicaraguan plant
and animal life, which will occur more often with the construction of the
road.
I take this opportunity to renew the assurances of my consideration.
[firma]
[sello]
Samuel Santos López
322 Annex 77
Diplomatic Note from the Minister of ForeignAffairs and Worship of
Costa Rica to the Minister of ForeignAffairs of Nicaragua,
Reference DM-AM-144-12,
14 March 2012 (3)
The Minister of Foreign Affairs and Worship
San José, 14 March 2012
DM-AM-144-12
Excellency:
I am writing to you with reference to your note MRE/DM-AJ/118/02/12, dated 13
February 2012, by means of which your Government responds to two Costa Rican notes.
Firstly, I refer to the request made by Costa Rica about technical information relating
to the quality of the waters of the San Juan River , and about the impact of the infrastucture
works that are being carried out by Nicaragua in the border area. The information requested
by Costa Rica from your country about the situation of the waters of the San Juan R iver and
that your country refuses to provide, only demonstrates that the alleged damages of which
Nicaragua accuses Costa Rica are non-existent.
Also, the fact that infrastucture works , being carried out by Nicaragua in the border
area, are financed or endorsed by third countries or financial organizations, in no way implies
that these works don’t affect the environm ent or Costa Rica. Nicaragua never presented
reports of any kind to the Republic of Costa Rica about these works.
As to your rejection of the damages caused by the dredging of the San Juan River by
Nicaragua, my country reiterates that they are real. The mere fact that representatives of your
government have acknowledged that the dredging is really intended for the construction of an
interoceanic canal, is irrefutable proof of this and of the non- compliance by Nicaragua with
its international obligations.
In relation to you allusion to the fact that Costa Rica has supposedly lost its rights
over the San Juan del Norte Bay, or, where appropriate, over the territory that comprises the
area where the Bay was situated in 1858 – if indeed it has ceased to exist --, this is entirely
unsupported and unfounded and my country rejects it outright. In accordance with the
referenced Treaty and international law, Costa Rica’s rights of condominium over the San
Juan del Norte and Salinas Bays are intact and they include not only the water column but
also the airspace, the soil and subsoil of the aforementioned bays.
Finally, Costa Rica reaffirms the contents of its letter of protest against the
illegitimate incursion of Nicaraguan soldiers on Costa Rican territory.
I take this opportunity to renew the assurances of my consideration.
[firma] [sello]
Enrique Castillo Barrantes
Minister
His Excellency
Samuel Santos López
Minister of Foreign Affairs
Republic of Nicaragua
323324 Annex 78
EXCERPTS
Joint Declaration of the Presidents of the Republics of Costa Rica,
RafaelAngel Calderon Fournier and Nicaragua,
Mrs. Violeta Barrios de Chamorro, Managua,
Republic of Nicaragua
31 January 1991 (1)
Final Record of the IV Binational Nicaragua-Costa Rica meeting
12 – 13 May 1997 (2)
Final Record of the V Binational Nicaragua-Costa Rica meeting
19 – 20 October 2006 (3)
VII Meeting of the Nicaragua-Costa Rica, Bi-national Commission
3 October 2008 (4)
325326 Annex 78
Joint Declaration of the Presidents of the Republics of Costa Rica, Rafael Angel
Calderon Fournier and Nicaragua, Mrs. Violeta Barrios de Chamorro, Managua,
Republic of Nicaragua, 31 January 1991 (1)
VII.- Upon analyzing and assessing the state of the bilateral relations between their countries,
they agreed to create a Binational Commission in order to strengthen and deepen the bonds of
cooperation between their respective peoples and governments
*******
Final Record of the IV Binational Nicaragua-Costa Rica meeting, 12 – 13 MAY 1997 (2)
2.b.1.2. Development of a project for detailed, large-scale maps in the border area between
Punta de Castilla and Peñas Blancas
*******
Final Record of the V Binational Nicaragua-Costa Rica meeting, 19 – 20 October 2006
(3)
3. SUB COMMISSION FOR BORDER AFFAIRS
The delegations agreed that in the first semester of 2007 it was necessary to organize a work
plan for the restoration and replacement of the main border markers, as well as the border
markers installed in conf ormity with the 1858 Jérez -Cañas Border Treaty and the Alexander
Decisions.
…
The Delegations agreed that the IGN and the INETER should continue geodesic studies in
order to determine the precise location of Marker I. For this purpose, during the first qua rter
of 2007, they will carry out the necessary coordination.
*******
327Annex 78
VII Meeting of the Nicaragua-Costa Rica, Bi-national Commission, 3 October 2008 (4)
19. Also, both Delegations welcomed the signing of a Letter of Agreement between the
National Geographic Institute of the Public Works and Transport Ministry of Costa Rica and
the Nicaraguan Territorial Studies Institute on Geographical Information, Cooperation and
Exchange. See addendum.
In the first actions derived from the Letter of Agreement both Institutes agree to exchange
during the fourth trimester of the year 2008, all the necessary information in order that
geodetic coordinates be consistent with the land border markers between both countries in
view of the ratification of the process for increasing the markers jointly installed to date. They
also agree to initiate coordinated preparatory measures for the development of the basic
compatible cartography in the common border area.
*******
328 Annex 79
Minutes of the Public Consultation in San Juan de Nicaragua
9 August 2006 (1)
Certification of the Municipal Council of San Juan de Nicaragua
10 August 2006 (2)
329330 Annex 79
Minutes of the Public Consultation in San Juan de Nicaragua
9 August 2006(1)
San Juan de Nicaragua, 9 August 2006
RECORD
The Municipality of San Juan de Nicaragua, MARENA and the National port Authority
(EPN) invited the population, the civil andmilitary authorities, of this Municipality, to the
presentation of the Environmental Impact Document FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF
NAVIGATION ON THE SAN JUAN DE NICARAGUA RIVER (Delta of the Colorado -
San Juan de Nicaragua). This activity was held in the auditor ium of the soup kitchen for
children of this town.
The Study was prepared and presented by the experts hired for that purpose by the company
COREA Y ASOCIADOS S.A.
After having heard the analysis and technical explanations of the Social, environmental,
hydrogeological, situation and the environmental management program and its plans for
monitoring and environmental control, contingency planning, environmental education
program, and the environmental restoration program.
These programs are all integrally designed to minimize, protect and restore the negative
impacts that the project might have on the ecological environment of the river due the action
of the Dredging.
We, the local authorities, the population and the institutions present, have been satisfied, not
only with the explanations but that a project of great importance for the development of this
municipality is becoming a reality, that we have been requesting for a long time , and it is
only in this year 2006 that a promise, made so many times, is fulfilled.
Given in the Municipality of San Juan de Nicaragua of the Río San Juan Department on the
ninth day of the month of August of the year two thousand and six.
Therefore, to attest to our satisfaction we sign:
[seal] [signatures]
331Annex 79
Certification of the Municipal Council of San Juan de Nicaragua
10 August 2006(2)
MUNICIPALITY
SAN JUAN DE NICARAGUA
Río San Juan Department
CERTIFICATION No.
The undersigned Secretary of the Mu nicipal Council certifies that a fter having heard the
analysis and technical explanations of the Social, Environmental situation , and the
environmental management program and its programs for monitoring and environmental
control, contingency planning, environmental management program and environmental
restoration program.
We know that all these programs are integrally designed to minimize, protect and restore the
negative impacts that the project might cause to the ecological environment of the river due
to the action of the dredging.
We, the local authorities, the public, and the representatives of the institutions present, have
been satisfied, so that during the debate on the report about the environmental impact that the
dredging might cause there was no disagreement from the population, since a project of great
importance for the development of this municipality is becoming a reality.
Given in the Municipality of San Juan de Nicaragua (Greytown) Río San Juan Department on
the tenth day of the month of August of the year 2006
[signature]
Hilario Alberto Ballestero Casanova
Secretary of the Municipal Council
San Juan de Nicaragua, R.S.J.
332 Annex 80
Affidavit of José Magdiel Pérez Solis (Police)
15 December 2010
333334 Annex 80
AFFIDAVIT OF JOSÉ MAGDIEL PÉREZ SOLIS (POLICE)
335Annex 80
AFFIDAVIT
[SEAL] LEGAL INSTRUMENT NUMBER ONE HUNDRED FIFTY TWO (152).-
(NOTARIZED STATEMENT).- In Managua City, at six in the afternoon of December fifteen
two thousand ten.- Before me, WALNER ABRAHAM MOLINA PÉREZ, Lawyer and Notary
Public of the Republic of Nicaragua, with domicile and residence in this city, duly authorized by
its Excellence Supreme Court of Justice to practice in this profession of Notary Public during the
five years prior to April fifteen two t housand and thirteen, personally appears Mr. JOSÉ
MAGDIEL PÉREZ SOLIS , identifying himself with Identification Document Number: uno,
seis, cuatro, slash, two, eight, cero, nine, five, seven, slash, cero, cero, cero, cero, M (164-
280957-0000M), adult, married, Major Police Commissioner of the Nicaraguan National Police,
with domicile in San Carlos City, Department of Río San Juan, in transit in this city; whom I
attest to personally know, and whom under my judgment has the necessary civil and legal
capacity to contract and obligate himself, and specially to execute this instrument. Manifests as
follows: First: I am a citizen of the Repub lic of Nicaragua, born in Es telí City, Department of
Estelí, on September twenty eight, nineteen fift y seven. I currently have my domicile in San
Carlos, Department of Río San Juan.- Second: I was appointed Chief of the Departmental
Delegation of the National Poli ce in the Río San Juan Department on March, two thousand and
eight (2008), a position that I have until this day. The San Juan Delegation has fifteen (15)
officers located in San Juan de Nicaragua, and twen ty one (21) officers that constitute the Rural
Intervention Group (GIR), which is activated a ccordingly with the operations done in the zone,
against narcotics trafficking and so on. In San Juan de Nicaragua we have a one hundred fifteen
horsepower motorboat with capacity for ten people, which we use for constant patrol activities in
the Harbor Head Lagoon area and its streams, when they are navigable. During winter, patrol
activities have, as an access point, the bar locatein the Caribbean just in front of the Harbor
Head Lagoon, due to the water flood that create s this access point. Al so, during winter, the
streams turn navigable, and so we can carry out inspection patrol activities there. Nevertheless,
we cannot cover certain parts of the streams that are not navigable due to sedimentation. Patrol
activities are carried out once or twice a week, sometimes jointly with the Nicaraguan Army and
sometimes only by the National Police. Since tw o thousand and eight (2008), up to this day, I
have never seen Costa Rican presence in the zone.- In two thousand and eight (2008) we
received a visiting delegation of the Costa Rican Public Force, in San Carlos, for meeting the
336 Annex 80
Nicaraguan National Police, where police-relate d information was exchanged, and where the
presence of Nicaraguan National Police throughout the south east zone of Nicaragua, including
the Harbor Head zone, was informed. Communica tions between the Nicaraguan National Police
and the Costa Rican public Forces have always been fluent and it is va lid to comment that we
have never had any problems, even more, we have always exchanged, in a reciprocal manner, all
kind of information for fugitive capturing.- The National Police Operational Plan in the Harbor
Head zone, and all the San Juan River zone has not changed, keeping its permanent nature.- - As
this was expressed by the party in appearance, well instructed by Me, the Notary Public, about
the scope, merit and legal consequences of this act, its purpose, the one in its General Provisions
that assure its validity, of the Special ones it c ontains, of the ones involving waivers and explicit
or implicit provisions.- I read this affidavit to the party in appearance, whom agrees, approves
and ratifies.- Signed jointly with Me, the Notary P ublic that certify all what was done.- (s) José
M. Pérez S.-
Done before Me, from the back of the Folio Number One Hundred Thirty Seven
(137) to the front of the Folio Number One Hundred Thirty Eight (138) of my REGISTRY
NUMBER TWENTY THREE (23) that I file this year.- On the request of the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Nicaragua, I issue this FIRST AFFIDAVIT, composed of
ONE (1) Useful Folio, that I rubric, sign and seal in Nicaragua City at six thirty on the afternoon
of December fifteen, two thousand and ten.-
[SEAL]
[SIGNED]
- 2 -
337338 Annex 81
Affidavit of Gregorio de JesúsAburto Ortiz (Police)
15 December 2010
339340 Annex 81
AFFIDAVIT OF GREGORIO DE JESÚS ABURTO ORTIZ (POLICE)
341Annex 81
AFFIDAVIT
[SEAL] LEGAL INSTRUMENT NUMBER ONE HUNDRED FORTY EIGHT
(148).- (NOTARIZED STATEMENT).- In Managua City, at two in the afternoon of December
fifteen two thousand and ten.- Before me, WALNER ABRAHAM MOLINA PÉREZ, Lawyer
and Notary Public of the Republic of Nicaragua, with domicile and residence in this city, duly
authorized by its Excellence Supreme Court of Jus tice to practice in this profession of Notary
Public during the five years prior to April fifteen two thousand and thirteen, personally appears
Mr. GREGORIO DE JESÚS ABURTO ORTIZ , identifying himself with Identification
Document Number: zero, four, one, dash, zero, eight, ze ro, five, five, five, dash, zero, zero,
zero, one, Q (041-080555-0001 Q) , adult, married, Major Police Commissioner of the
Nicaraguan National Police, with domicile in Jinote pe City, Department of Carazo, in transit in
this city; whom I attest to personally know, and whom under my judgment has the necessary
civil and legal capacity to contract and obligate himself, and specially to execute this instrument.
Manifests as follows: First: I am a citizen of the Republic of Nicaragua, born in Jinotepe City,
Department of Carazo, on May ei ght, nineteen fifty five. I curently have my domicile in
Jinotepe City, Department of Carazo- Second: From nineteen seventy ni ne (1979) to nineteen
eighty three I was appointed Chief of the Polic e Delegation of Río San Juan. Our main duty
consisted in keeping public security at south east Nicaragua, specifically at the San Juan, El
Castillo, Greytown, Harbor Head and the Caribbean coast line zone s, and to cooperate with the
Popular Sandinista Army, today’s Nicaraguan Army, in the defense of the country’s sovereignty.
At that time, the nearest town to the Harbor Head lagoon was Greyto wn, point in which the
Army had the Borderline Guard Troops (TGF).- I recall that the TGF detachment was located in
a rustic construction, a stall, supported by a wooden base in the Harbor Head swamp.- The Police
Delegation, of which I was appointed Chief, was located up river, in San Carlos. Under our
patrol and security activities, it is important to point out that we had permanent presence in the
Harbor Head zone, where we carried out constant patrol activities. The patrol activities were
carried out by two methods, one by small “panga” boats, and the other by walking where it was
possible. Our patrols in “pangas” or low power ed boats, were carried out through the different
entrance routes of the Head Harbor lagoon. Due to the vegetation characteristics in the zone, we
had to be preventive and cautious while carrying out patrols, wh ich is the reason why we used
the streams that connect the San Juan River with the Harbor Head lagoon, looking for counter
342 Annex 81
revolutionaries, narcotics traffickers, law fugitives and, in general, all kinds of operations that
were and are included in the National Police mandate.- Since two thousa nd four (2004) through
two thousand five (2005) I was appointed Chief of the Police Detachment at Río San Juan. In
this new period, the Police post was in the same position where it is now, with a strong structure;
I have to say that during 2004 and 2005 there was no presence of Costa Rican civil authorities or
public forces in the Harbor Head zone. The Costa Rican public fo rce body always kept itself up
in the Sarapiquí River. Our pa trol missions were sometimes conducted jointly with the Naval
Force members, whom had a post point in Gr eytown. The operations carried out basically
consisted in contingents against wild life traffick ing and drug trafficking. Related to the later, it
is important to point out the capture of the “Tarzanes” criminal organization that was involved in
the assassination of four policemen located in Bluefields. We also shared patrol activities with
public servers of the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (MARENA), to prevent
natural resources trafficking.- As this was expr essed by the party in app earance, well instructed
by Me, the Notary Public, about the scope, merit a nd legal consequences of this act, its purpose,
the one in its General Provisions that assure its validity, of the Special ones it contains, of the
ones involving waivers and explicit or implicit provisions.- I read this affidavit to the party in
appearance, whom agrees, approves and ratifies.- Signed jointly with Me, the Notary Public that
certify all what was done.- (s) Gregorio Aburto O.- (s) Molina.- Notario.-
Done before Me, from the back of th e Folio Number One Hundred Thirty Four
(134) to the front of the Folio Number One Hundred Thirty Five (135) of my REGISTRY
NUMBER TWENTY THREE (23) that I file this year.- On the request of the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Nicaragua, I issue this FIRST AFFIDAVIT, composed of
ONE (1) Useful Folio, that I rubric, sign and seal in Nicaragua City at two thirty on the afternoon
of December fifteen, two thousand and ten.-
[SEAL]
[SIGNED]
- 2 -
343344 Annex 82
Affidavit of Luis Fernando Barrantes Jiménez (Police)
15 December 2010
345346 Annex 82
AFFIDAVIT OF LUIS FERNANDO BARRANTES JIMÉNEZ (POLICE)
347Annex 82
AFFIDAVIT
[SEAL] LEGAL INSTRUMENT NUMBER ON E HUNDRED FIFTY (150).-
(NOTARIZED STATEMENT).- In Managua City, at four in the afternoon of December fifteen
two thousand and ten.- Before me, WALNER ABRAHAM MOLINA PÉREZ , Lawyer and
Notary Public of the Republic of Nicaragua, w ith domicile and residence in this city, duly
authorized by its Excellence Supreme Court of Jus tice to practice in this profession of Notary
Public during the five years ex piring April fifteen two thousand and thirteen, personally appears
Mr. LUIS FERNANDO BARRANTES JIMÉNEZ , identifying himself with Identification
Document Number: zero, zero, one, dash, two, seven, zero, seven, five, nine, dash, zero, zero,
two, nine, H (001-270759-0029 H) , adult, married, Major Po lice Commissioner of the
Nicaraguan National Police, with domicile in Ch inandega City, Department of Chinandega, in
transit in this city; whom I attest to personally know, and wh om under my judgment has the
necessary civil and legal capacity to contract and obligate himself, and specially to execute this
instrument. Manifests as follows: First: I am a citizen of the Republ ic of Nicaragua, born in
Managua City, Department of Managua, on July tw enty seven, nineteen fi fty nine. I currently
have my domicile in Managua City, Department of Managua- Second: Since nineteen ninety
seven (1997) through nineteen ninety nine (1999), I was appointed Chief of the Police
Delegation at San Juan River.- At that time the National Police presence at San Juan River of
Nicaragua was constant, and had the duty of ensu ring public order and security in the zone
between the Harbor Head lagoon and the surrounding streams, where we constantly had patrols
to prevent crime and drug trafficking, which wa s already serious, a zone in which we never
found the presence of any Costa Rican civil authority or public fo rce, there were only
Nicaraguans. We were also present at the more sedimentary zone, at the river margin, which was
considered a high risk zone.- At that time, Arnoldo Alemán, ex President, visited the zone of San
Juan River twice, as is usual, security operations were set up which included the presence of
three fellow officers at the Harbor Head swamp. The duty of these officers of the National Police
at Harbor Head was to secure the perimeter. As part of the security operations the Harbor Head,
San Juan River, San Juan del Norte and surrounding zones were flown over by a helicopter
belonging to the Nicaraguan Army; Harbor Head was an area that was included in our security
operations, in special operations and in constant patrol activities of the National Police because it
was considered Nicaraguan territory. During the pe riod in which I rendered my service as Chief
348 Annex 82
of the Delegation of the National Police at San Ju an River, we never received any complaint or
protest from any Costa Rican authority or public force and, in the same way; we never saw any
presence of Costa Rican civil or public force aut horities at Harbor Head.- As this was expressed
by the party in appearance, well instructed by Me , the Notary Public, about the scope, merit and
legal consequences of this act, its purpose, the one in its General Provisions that assure its
validity, of the Special ones it contains, of the ones involving waivers and explicit or implicit
provisions.- I read this affidavit to the party in appearance, whom agrees, approves and ratifies.-
Sing jointly with Me, the Notary Public that certify all what was done.- (s ) L. F. Barrantes.- (s)
Molina.-
Done before Me, from the front of the Folio Number One Hundred Thirty Six
(136) to the back of the same Folio of my REGISTRY NUMBER TWENTY THREE (23) that I
file this year.- On the request of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Nicaragua, I
issue this FIRST AFFIDAVIT, composed of ONE (1) Useful Folio, that I rubric, sign and seal in
Nicaragua City at four thirty on the afternoon of December fifteen, two thousand and ten.-
[SEAL]
[SIGNATURE]
- 2 -
349350 Annex 83
Affidavit of Douglas Rafael Pichardo Ramírez (Police)
15 December 2010
351352 Annex 83
AFFIDAVIT OF DOUGLAS RAFAEL PICHARDO RAMÍREZ (POLICE)
353Annex 83
AFFIDAVIT
[SEAL] LEGAL INSTRUMENT NUMBER ONE H UNDRED FORTY NINE (149).-
(NOTARIZED STATEMENT) .- In Managua City, at three in the afternoon of December
fifteen two thousand and ten.- Before me, WALNER ABRAHAM MOLINA PÉREZ, Lawyer
and Notary Public of the Republic of Nicaragua, with domicile and residence in this city, duly
authorized by its Excellence Supreme Court of Jus tice to practice in this profession of Notary
Public for the five years prior to April fifteen two thousand and thirteen, personally appears Mr.
DOUGLAS RAFAEL PICHARDO RAMÍREZ , identifying himself with Identification
Document Number: zero, eight, four, dash, zero, one, on e, zero, five, six, dash, zero, zero,
zero, zero, Y (084-011056-0000Y), adult, married, Major Police Commissioner of the
Nicaraguan National Police, with domicile in Ch inandega City, Department of Chinandega, in
transit in this city; whom I attest to personally know, and wh om under my judgment has the
necessary civil and legal capacity to contract and obligate himself, and specially to execute this
instrument. Manifests as follows: First: I am a citizen of the Republ ic of Nicaragua, born in
Chinandega City, Department of Chinandega, on Ma y first, nineteen fifty six. I currently have
my domicile in Chinandega City, Department of Chinandega- Second: From nineteen eighty two
(1982) to nineteen eighty seve n (1987), I was appointed Chief of the Police Delegation of San
Juan del Norte, now known as San Juan de Nicar agua, period in which th e regional conflicts
were related to armed conflicts with the counter revolutionary forces.- From nineteen ninety two
(1992) to nineteen ninety-four (1994), I was appointed as Second Chief of the National Police
Delegation in San Carlos, San Juan River, years during which the na ture of the patrol activities
had changed. In such days, the counter revoluti onary forces were already expelled from the
country’s south east, and our patrol activities corresponded to keeping the security of those
citizens that lived in what was known as Greytown, as well as a co nstant battle against narcotics
trafficking groups in what is now known as San Juan de Nicaragua, which covered the zone
between Harbor Head and the Caribbean coast line up to Punta Castilla.- In two thousand eight
(2008), I was appointed as Second Chief at the [illegal] Drug Dire ctorate of the Special Forces
Detachment of the National Police in that z one, carrying out several operations, including the
one known as “Plan Todo Incluido”, that covere d among other things, overseeing the commonly
utilized routes for narcotics trafficking, as it was the case in Harbor Head. At that time we fluidly
navigated from the river’s Delta to its mouth using one hundred fifteen (115) horsepower motor
354 Annex 83
boats. During winter time, the Harbor Head’s canals became navigable, but not all of them, there
were some places in which we pushed the boats. Even though, these canals were included in our
patrol activities. Things are different in summer time when the river conditions change and most
of the streams become dry and not navigable. During our constant patrol activities throughout all
the Harbor Head zone and its st reams, Indio River, the lagoon and the San Juan River we never
found any Costa Rican authorities neither civil servants.- As this was expressed by the party in
appearance, well instructed by Me, the Notary Public, about the scope, merit and legal
consequences of this act, its purpose, the one in its General Provisions that assure its validity, of
the Special ones it contains, of the ones involving waivers and explic it or implicit provisions.- I
read this affidavit to the party in appearance, whom agrees, approves and ratifies.- Signed jointly
with Me, the Notary Public that certify all what was done.- (s) Douglas R. Pichardo R.- (s)
Molina.- Notario.-
Done before Me, from the front of th e Folio Number One Hundred Thirty Five
(135) to the front of the Folio Number One Hundred Thirty Six (1 36) of my REGISTRY
NUMBER TWENTY THREE (23) that I file this year.- On the request of the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Nicaragua, I issue this FIRST AFFIDAVIT, composed of
ONE (1) Useful Folio, that I rubric, sign and seal in Nicaragua City at three thirty on the
afternoon of December fifteen, two thousand and ten.-
[SEAL]
[SIGNED]
- 2 -
355356 Annex 84
Affidavit of SubanAntonio Yuri Valle Olivares (Police)
15 December 2010
357358 Annex 84
AFFIDAVIT OF SUBAN ANTONIO YURI VALLE OLIVARES (POLICE)
359Annex 84
AFFIDAVIT
[SEAL] LEGAL INSTRUMENT NUMBER ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY
ONE (151).- (NOTARIZED STATEMENT).- In the city of Managua, at five in the afternoon
on the fifteenth day of December of the year two thousand and ten.- Before me, WALNER
ABRAHAM MOLINA PÉREZ, Lawyer and Notary Public of the Republic of Nicaragua, with
domicile and residence in this city, duly authorized by its Excellence Supreme Court of Justice to
practice in this profession of Notary Public during the five years that expires on the fifteenth of
April of the year two thousand and thirteen, appears the person of Mr. SUBAN ANTONIO
YURI VALLE OLIVARES, identifying himself with Identification Document Number: zero,
zero, one, dash, zero, seven, zero, six, six, one, dash, zero, zero, five, six, B (001-070661-
0056B), adult, married, Mayor Police Commissioner of the Nicaraguan National Police, with
domicile in Masaya City, Department of Masaya, in transit in this city; whom I attest to
personally know, and whom under my judgment has the sufficient necessary civil and legal
capacity to contract and obligate himself, and specially to execute this action. Manifests as
follows: First: I am a citizen of the Republic of Nicaragua, born in Managua City, Department
of Managua, on June seven, nineteen sixty one. I currently have my domicile in Masaya City,
Department of Masaya.- Second: Since nineteen ninety eight (1998) through nineteen ninety
nine (1999), I was designated Second Chief of the National Police Delegation in San Juan River,
period during which I recall carrying out patrols, in cooperation with members of the Nicaraguan
Army, along all the San Juan River zone, to strength the presence of the government. These
patrols were carried out by land, sea or by the air. The National Police has had a permanent
presence in Harbor Head, boat patrols have been carried out throughout the streams and constant
security contingents have been taken in different zones when required.- The only Costa Rican
presence has been the rural guard or public force post located in the Delta, from the San Juan
River Delta throughout the river’s mouth we never saw any presence of Costa Rican civil
authorities or public force.- As this was expressed by the party in appearance, well instructed by
Me, the Notary Public, about the scope, merit and legal consequences of this act, its purpose, the
one in its General Provisions that assure its validity, of the Special ones it contains, of the ones
involving waivers and explicit or implicit provisions.- I read this affidavit to the party in
appearance, whom agrees, approves and ratifies.- Signed jointly with Me, the Notary Public, that
certify all what was done.- (s) Yuri Valle.- (s) Molina. Notario.-
360 Annex 84
Done before Me, from the back of the Folio Number One Hundred Thirty Six
(136) to the front of the Folio Number One Hundred Thirty Seven (137) of my REGISTRY
NUMBER TWENTY THREE (23) that I file this year.- On the request of the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Nicaragua, I issue this FIRST AFFIDAVIT, composed of
ONE (1) Useful Folio, that I rubric, sign and seal in the City of Managua City at five thirty on
the afternoon of December fifteen, two thousand and ten.-
[SEAL]
[SIGNATURE]
- 2 -
361362 Annex 85
Affidavit of Mr. Juan Francisco Gutierrez Espinoza
15 December 2010
363364 Annex 85
AFFIDAVIT
[SEAL] LEGAL INSTRUMENT NUMBER ONE HUNDRED FOURTY THREE
(143).- (NOTARIZED STATEMENT).- In the city of Managua, at eight in the morning on the
fifteenth day of December in the year two thousand and ten.- Before me, WALNER
ABRAHAM MOLINA PÉREZ, Lawyer and Notary Public of the Republic of Nicaragua, with
domicile and residence in this city, duly authorized by its Excellence Supreme Court of Justice to
practice in this profession of Notary Public during the five years prior to April fifteen two
thousand and thirteen, personally appears Mr. JUAN FRANCISCO GUTIÉRREZ
ESPINOZA, identifying himself with Identification Document Number: zero, zero, one, dash,
one, three, zero, one, six, one, dash, zero, zero, four, eight, X (001-130161-0048 X), adult,
married, Military in active duty, with domicile in Managua; whom I attest to personally know,
and whom under my judgment has the necessary civil and legal capacity to contract and obligate
himself, and specially to execute this instrument. Manifests as folloFirst: I am a citizen of
the Republic of Nicaragua, born in Managua City, on January thirteen, ni▯neteen sixty one. I
currently have my domicile in Managua City, Department of Managua- Second: During nineteen
eighty two (1982) through nineteen eighty three (1983); nineteen eig▯hty eight (1988) through
nineteen ninety one (1991) I was an officer of the War Marine Force, now known as the
Nicaraguan Naval Force, my duties included carrying on patrol throughout the San Juan River
and the south east zone of Nicaragua, and from two thousand (2000) through two thousand two
(2002), I was located at the Bluefields base, patrolling the Nicaraguan coast line up to Punta
Castilla. My instructions were to carry on guarding patrols throughout t▯he entire zone of the
Nicaraguan coast line, including Punta Castilla up to Cabo Gracias a Dios. During winter
months, when the barrier located at Harbor Head was broken, we were allowed to enter in boats,
twenty-three feet long with fifty five and seventy five horsepower.- Sin▯ce nineteen eighty seven
(1987) 115 horsepower boats were used; during winter we used to enter Harbor Head through the
streams that connect it to the san Juan River, even during summer the Harbor H▯ead lagoon was
accessed through its streams, even though it was more complicated and more than once we had
to push the boats stuck in the sedimentary sand banks due to the river’s low flow. Our orders
were always to defend our territory and protect our sovereignty, therefo▯re we patrolled the
northern and southern parts of the country.- During my service time we never saw any Costa
Rican civil authority or public force in the zone that covers Harbor Head, the San Juan River,
365Annex 85
and San Juan del Norte, or boats different than Nicaraguan.- During the ▯eighties, our patrol
activities mainly responded to fighting against the counter revolutionary forces led by Comander
Edén Pastora. To effectively comply with our duty as the Nicaraguan Army we had to protect the
zone so as to protect our national territory, therefore the Border Guard Troops had a base in the
swamps of Harbor Head, which was burned together with the town in Greytown, under
Comander Edén Pastora’s orders.- In the nineties (90), our mission ▯turned to be, among others,
protecting our security against narcotic traffickers, poachers, and keeping a permanent protection
of our sovereignty.- As this was expressed by the party in appearance, w▯ell instructed by Me, the
Notary Public, about the scope, merit and legal consequences of this act, its purpose, the one in
its General Provisions that assure its validity, of the Special ones it ▯contains, of the ones
involving waivers and explicit or implicit provisions.- I read this affidavit to the party in
appearance, whom agrees, approves and ratifies.- Sing jointly with Me, the Notary Public that
certify all what was done.- (s) J. F. Gutiérrez.- (s) Molina.- Notario.-
Done before Me, from the front of the Folio Number One Hundred Thirty On▯e
(131) to the back of the same Folio of my REGISTRY NUMBER TWENTY THREE (23) that I
file this year.- On the request of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of th▯e Republic of Nicaragua, I
issue this FIRST AFFIDAVIT, composed of ONE (1) Useful Folio, that I r▯ubric, sign and seal in
Nicaragua City at eight thirty in the morning of December fifteen, two thousand and ten.-
[SEAL]
[SIGNED]
- 2 -
366 Annex 86
Affidavit of Mr. Manuel Salvador Mora Ortiz
15 December 2010
367368 Annex 86
AFFIDAVIT
[SEAL] LEGAL INSTRUMENT NUMBER ONE HUNDRED FORTY FOUR (144).-
(NOTARIZED STATEMENT).- In Managua City, at nine in the morning of December fifteen
two thousand and ten.- Before me, WALNER ABRAHAM MOLINA PÉREZ , Lawyer and
Notary Public of the Republic of Nicaragua, with domicile and residence in this city, duly
authorized by its Excellence Supreme Court of Jus tice to practice in this profession of Notary
Public during the five years prior to April fifteen two thousand and thi▯rteen, personally appears
Mr. MANUEL SALVADOR MORA ORTIZ , identifying himself with Identification
Document Number: five, six, seven, dash, one, six, zero, two, five, three, dash, zero, zero,
zero, zero, V (567-160253-0000V) , adult, married, Military in retirement, with domicile in
Managua City, whom I attest to personally know, and whom under my judgment has the
necessary civil and legal capacity to contract and obligate himself, and specially to execute this
instrument. Manifests as follows: First: I am a citizen of the Republic of Nicaragua, born in San
Jorge City, Municipality of the Department of Rivas, on February sixteen, nineteen fifty three. I
am currently retired and have my domicile in Managua City.- Second: I entered the Port
Captaincy in El Castillo, Municipality of Río San Juan, on nineteen seventy nine (1979). My
duties included patrolling from San Carlos to Greytown. I was designated as the Caribbean
Commander, a position that I held from nineteen eighty one (1981) through nineteen eighty three
(1983) and from two thousand two (2002) through two thousand seven (2007). In the Caribbean
I used to patrol the whole coast line through Punta Castilla. During the period in which I
patrolled the Caribbean coast line, Harbor Head zone was accessed through two points: during
winter and on certain occasions during summer, with difficulties due to the low flow, through the
streams that connect the San Juan River with Harbor Head, and during winter through the bar in
front of Punta Castilla, this because during winter due to the water flows Harbor Head was
straightly accessible through the Caribbean and then going up to the San Juan River through its
different streams, and accordingly complying with the patrolling orders in defense of
sovereignty, during summer it was even possible to walk through the sand bar up to Harbor
Head, occasions in which I never saw any Costa Rican authority. During my service time, we
never found official Costa Rican boats sailing through the San Juan River, the Caribbean coast
line, Harbor Head, or the streams that connect it to the San Juan River. During nineteen eighty
three (1983) multiple operations were conducted in the south east zone of Nicaragua up to Punta
369Annex 86
Castilla; for search and control of the counter revolutionary forces tha▯t had San Juan del Norte
and its neighboring zones as base points. Part of these operations were conducted for controlling
narcotics trafficking activities and smuggling of general consumption products, which was
common in that period. After nineteen eighty four (1984), in which the “contra” was “kicked
out” from San Juan del Norte, patrolling activities from the San Juan River to Punta Castilla
increased through the sea and through the streams that connect the river with Harbor Head.-
Until two thousand seven (2007), we never saw Costa Rican civil authorities or public forces in
the Harbor Head zone, neither in its streams, the River San Juan or the Caribbean coast line; only
in one occasion we stopped a Costa Rican Coast Guard in the sea, near Punta Castilla, on
superior orders we released it 25 miles prior arriving to Bluefields, in Monkey Point, place to
which it was being transported by us.- As this was expressed by the party in appearance, well
instructed by Me, the Notary Public, about the scope, merit and legal consequences of this act, its
purpose, the one in its General Provisions that assure its validity, of ▯the Special ones it contains,
of the ones involving waivers and explicit or implicit provisions.- I read this affidavit to the party
in appearance, whom agrees, approves and ratifies.- Signed jointly with Me, the Notary Public
that certify all what was done.- (s) M. MORA O.- (s) Molina. Notario.-
Done before Me, from the back of the Folio Number One Hundred Thirty
One (131) to the back of the Folio Number One Hundred Thirty Two (132) of my REGISTRY
NUMBER TWENTY THREE (23) that I file this year.- On the request of the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Nicaragua, I issue this FIRST AFFIDAV▯IT, composed of
ONE (1) Useful Folio, that I rubric, sign and seal in Nicaragua City at nine thirty in the morning
of December fifteen, two thousand and ten.-
[SEAL]
[SIGNED]
- 2 -
370 Annex 87
Affidavit of Norman Javier Juárez Blanco (Military)
15 December 2010
371372 Annex 87
AFFIDAVIT OF NORMAN JAVIER JUÁREZ BLANCO (MILITARY)
373Annex 87
AFFIDAVIT
[SEAL] LEGAL INSTRUMENT NUMBER ONE HUNDRED FOURTY FIVE
(145).- (NOTARIZED STATEMENT).- In Managua City, at ten in the morning of December
fifteen two thousand and ten.- Before me, WALNER ABRAHAM MOLINA PÉREZ, Lawyer
and Notary Public of the Republic of Nicaragua, with domicile and residence in this city, duly
authorized by its Excellence Supreme Court of Jus tice to practice in this profession of Notary
Public during the five years prior to April fifteen two thousand and thirteen, personally appears
Mr. NORMAN JAVIER JUÁREZ BLANCO , identifying himself with Identification
Document Number: zero, eight, six, slash, zero, five, zero, two, seven, three, dash, zero, zero,
zero, zero, X (086-050273-0000X) , adult, married, active Military, with domicile in Managua
City, Department of Managua, whom I attest to personally know, and whom under my judgment
has the necessary civil and legal capacity to c ontract and obligate hims elf, and specially to
execute this instrument. Manifests as follows: First: I am a citizen of the Republic of Nicaragua,
born in El Viejo City, Municipality of the Department of Chinandega, on February five, nineteen
seventy three. I currently have my domicile in Managua City, Department of Managua.- Second:
In two thousand (2000) I was transferred to San Juan de Nicaragua, as ▯a Marine of the Naval
Force of the Nicaraguan Army, our duties consisted in three or four patrol journeys per week in
the Harbor Head zone, Indio Rive r and San Juan River, the patrol activities were carried out in
motorboats for six people. Duri ng our patrol activiti es we used to verify boat documentation
such as patents, navigational permits, and all the necessary documentation for navigating the San
Juan River. It usually took us from fifteen to twenty five minutes to go from my base post in San
Juan de Nicaragua to Harbor Head through the Caribbean pass, sometimes entering through the
bar, during the rainy season, or through different streams and arri ving Harbor Head, to continue
our pre established patrol route.Being the defense, security and protection of sovereignty a
typical mission of the Army, it corresponds to us constant patrol activities in our territory, which
include navigating in 115 horsepower boats thr ough the streams located in Harbor Head, which
are navigable during the winter season, although not in all of them.- As this was expressed by the
party in appearance, well instructed by Me, the Notary Public, about the scope, merit and legal
consequences of this act, its purpose, the one in its General Provisions that assure its validity, of
the Special ones it contains, of the ones involving waivers and explic it or implicit provisions.- I
read this affidavit to the party in appearance, whom agrees, approves and ratifies.- Singned
374 Annex 87
jointly with Me, the Notary Public that certify all what was done(s) Noman J. Juárez B..- (s)
Molina.-
Done before Me, from the back of the Folio Number One Hundred Thirty Two
(132) to the front of the Folio Number One Hundred Thirty Three (133) of my REGISTRY
NUMBER TWENTY THREE (23) that I file this year.- On the request of the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Nicaragua, I issue this FIRST AFFIDAVIT, composed of
ONE (1) Useful Folio, that I rubric, sign and seal in Nicaragua City at ten thirty on the morning
of December fifteen, two thousand and ten.-
[SEAL]
[SIGNED]
- 2 -
375376 Annex 88
Affidavit of Denis Membreño Rivas (Military)
15 December 2010
377378 Annex 88
AFFIDAVIT OF DENIS MEMBREÑO RIVAS (MILITARY)
379Annex 88
AFFIDAVIT
[SEAL] LEGAL INSTRUMENT NUMBER ONE HUNDRED FOURTY SEVEN
(147).- (NOTARIZED STATEMENT) .- In the city of Managua Department of Managua, at
one in the afternoon on the fifteenth day of Decemb er of the year two thousand and ten.- Before
me, WALNER ABRAHAM MOLINA PÉREZ, Lawyer and Notary Public of the Republic of
Nicaragua, with domicile and residence in this c ity, duly authorized by its Excellence Supreme
Court of Justice to practice in this profession of Notary Public during a five year period before
the fifteen day of April in the year two t housand and thirteen, pe rsonally appears Mr. DENIS
MEMBREÑO RIVAS, identifying himself with Identification Document Number: two, eight,
one, dash, one, six, zero, seven, five, six, dash, zero, zero, zero, seven, V (281-160756-0007
V), adult, married, Military in active duty, with domicile in Managua, Department of Managua.-
Manifests as follows: First: I am a citizen of the Republic of Nicaragua, born in León City,
Department of León, on July sixt een, nineteen fifty six (1956), I have been a member of the
Nicaraguan Army since July nineteen, nineteen seventy nine (1979). I am currently Major
General, acting as Inspector General of the Nicaraguan Army.- Second: On the day of March
ten, two thousand eight, in Managua City, before Notary Public Walner Abraham Molina Pérez,
I rendered my Notary Affidavit, which, by this public instrument I will extend.- Third: The
creation of the Militar Sur Detach ment in nineteen ninety two ( 1992) for separate attention of
San Juan river, coincides with the current San Juan de Nicaragua town foundation.- Intelligence
reports to that date suggested that San Juan de Nicaragua was turning into a focal point of
criminal activity, due to the distance, its access to the Indio and San Juan de Nicaragua rivers, the
Caribbean Sea and its closeness to Costa Rican territo ry.- Initially it was decided to take care of
the situation by carrying on periodical patrol activities and in approximately nineteen ninety-five
(1995) a military base point was installed for dealing with these criminal activities.- This military
base point was equipped with a small motor boat fo r fluvial patrol activities in the Indio and San
Juan de Nicaragua rivers, in the boundary zone of Punta Castilla, the Harbor Head lagoon and its
adjacent streams, which were used for smuggling and other criminal activities.- Costa Rica never
placed any forces in the Punta Castilla sector, the Harbor Head lagoon or its adjacent streams.-
The closest post to the border zone in the Caribb ean Sea were located in Puerto Lindo and Barra
de Colorado, where they continue to be.- They never requested any navigational permits on the
San Juan de Nicaragua Delta, neither for security nor for tourism reasons.- As this was expressed
380 Annex 88
by the party in appearance, well instructed by Me , the Notary Public, about the scope, merit and
legal consequences of this act, its purpose, the one in its General Provisions that assure its
validity, of the Special ones it contains, of the ones involving waivers and explicit or implicit
provisions.- I read this affidavit to the party in appearance, whom agrees, approves and ratifies.-
Sing jointly with Me, the Notary Public that certify all what was done.-
Done before Me, from the back of the Folio Number One Hundred Thirty
Three (133) to the front of the Folio Number One Hundred Thirty Four (134) of my REGISTRY
NUMBER TWENTY THREE (23) that I file this year.- On the request of the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Nicaragua, I issue this FIRST AFFIDAVIT, composed of
ONE (1) Useful Folio, that I rubric, sign and seal in Nicaragua City at one in the afternoon of
December fifteen, two thousand and ten.-
[SEAL]
[SIGNED]
- 2 -
381382 Annex 89
Affidavit of Farle Isidro Roa Traña
16 December 2010
383384 Annex 89
AFFIDAVIT
[SEAL] LEGAL INSTRUMENT NUMBER ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY-THREE
(153). (NOTARIZED STATEMENT).- In the city of Managua, at eight o’clock in the morning on
the sixteenth day of December in the year two thousand and ten. Before me, WALNER
ABRAHAM MOLINA PÉREZ ; Attorney and Notary Public, of the Republic of Nicaragua,
domiciled in and resident of this city, duly authorized by the Most Honorab▯le Supreme Court of
Justice to practice the profession of Notary during the five-year period that expires on the fifteenth
day of April in the year two thousand and thirteen, appears for himself and in his own behalf Mr.
FARLE ISIDRO ROA TRAÑA , identified with Identification Card Number two, eight, one,
dash, zero, five, zero, eight, six, eight, dash, zero, zero, one, nine, B (281-050868-0019B ), of
legal age, single, Assistant Commissioner of the N ational Police of Nicaragua, Licentiate in Law,
with domicile in the city of Managua, Department of Managua, whom I certify that I know
personally and who in my judgment has the sufficient civil and legal capacity necessary to bind and
contract, especially for the granting of this act, manifests the followFIRST: I am a citizen in
the Republic of Nicaragua, born in the city of León, Department of León, on the fifth of August,
nineteen hundred and sixty-eight. Currently I have my domicile in the city of Managua, Department
of Managua. SECOND : I have been a member of the Police Institution since the year nineteen
hundred and eighty-seven. During my years of service I have worked in the Department of Public
Security, National Police of León, in the year two thousand I was transferred to the position of
Investigation Specialist at the National Judicial Assistance Department, in the year two thousand
and three I was named Section Head of Drug Crimes, at the Judicial Assistance Department, and in
the year two thousand and five I was named Head of the Drug Department at the Judicial Assistance
Department, which position I currently hold. Among my functions as Head of the aforementioned
Department I am responsible for investigating cases of drug trafficking, organized crime, and
money laundering on a national level. As a result of my position I was appointed to handle the case
of the Organized Crime family called “Los Tarzanes,” and other members. THIRD: Within the
framework of the joint operations between the National Police and the Nicaraguan Army to fight
Drug Trafficking and Organized Crime, an operation was begun on the first of October in the year
two thousand and ten, at approximately 4:50 in the afternoon on the Indio Maíz River, Caño Roca,
jurisdiction of the Autonomous Region of the South Atlantic (RAAS); where Officers from the
Naval Force of the Nicaraguan Army, First Lieutenant Albert William Solís, who was in command
of the
385Annex 89
speedboat registered 061, along with Gabriel Enrique Olivas and other of▯ficers, was performing
patrol work due to information from the Department of Police Intelligence and the Naval District of
the South Atlantic. The information indicated that in this location, illegal activities had been
performed for three weeks to the day. FOURTH: Once the officers of the Naval District were close
to the bank of Caño Roca, they were able to observe two citizens in a suspicious and nervous
posture, and therefore they proceeded to follow those two citizens, who fled to a rustic encampment
on the same bank of Caño Roca (sixty-three kilometers to the south of the city of Bluefields); and
therefore First Lieutenant Albert William Zapata Solís and his subordinates in pursuit of these two
citizens were able to detect another four citizens, and they proceeded to arrest the six citizens. When
interviewing the six citizens they identified themselves with the following names: Carlos Alberto
Barriendo Lovo, Policarpo Casildo Blanco, Pedro Alberto Ortega Ramírez, José Israel Ayala Funez,
Lorenzo Casildo Alvarez, and Rafael Antonio García Rivera, all Hondur▯an nationals. In the
inspection performed onsite, forty plastic barrels were found with the capacity to store
approximately sixty gallons each; of these twenty-seven barrels were filled with gasoline and three
were empty; six combat weapons and their ammunition were also seized from them, which were as
follows: A CAL brand 5.56 rifle, Serial Number FN1320 with number 1-75; an AKM rifle serial
number BA225230; an AKM rifle Serial Number AH2657P; an AKM rifle Serial Number 544463;
and AKM rifle Serial Number KR9225; and a AKM rifle Serial Number 2554. FIFTH: Once the
inspection was performed, both the suspects and the evidence found were transferred to Coast
Guard 401 of the Naval Forces of the Army of Nicaragua, and the Commandant thereof, Lieutenant
Commander Roberto Scoot Campos Barrios, proceeded to interview the suspects, ascertaining that
they had another encampment in San Juan de Nicaragua, the area of the caños [i.e., small channels]
around the Harbort [sic] Head lagoon, where there were two speedboats and fuel, and therefore h▯e
notified his superiors who ordered him to go to San Juan de Nicaragua, together with the suspects.
They were remanded into custody at the San Juan de Nicaragua Post of the Southern Mili▯tary
Detachment of the Nicaraguan Army. SIXTH: Then, at six in the afternoon on that same day,
October first in the year two thousand and ten, Commodore Jesús Wilfredo Castañeda Arosteguí,
aboard Speedboat 065, left the Naval base, Atlantic Naval District of the Naval Forces of the
Nicaraguan Army, located in the Port of El Bluff, headed toward San Juan de Nicaragua, spending
the night in that locale. At five o’clock in the morning on the second day of October in the year two
thousand and ten, Commodore Castañeda Arosteguía, with an team of marine infantry from the
Naval Forces, moved onboard speedboat 065 and
386 Annex 89
auxiliary boat 061, headed toward the Harbor Head zone and its surrounding caños, conducting an
exploration in the caños and swamps of the Harbor Head Lagoon, finding two unnamed Cigarette
speedboats, which were as follows: A Cigarette fiberglass boat, light bl▯ue on the outside and white
inside, unnamed, containing eleven plastic barrels with a capacity of approximately sixty gallons
each; of these barrels some were full and others empty; a black Ritchie brand compass; two black
Duncan 1000 brand 12-volt batteries, one double control and one single c▯ontrol; a rudder; two sump
pumps; three Yamaha brand outboard engines, each 200 hp with no model or serial number; and
three steel propellers. The second was an Eduardono boat, fiberglass with no name, blue on the
outside and lead, containing three plastic barrels with a capacity of sixty gallons each, a rudder, a
black Dantorth compass, a Yamaha brand double control, two Comber brand twelve-volt batteries
and a sump pump, two Yamaha brand outboard engines, 200 hp each, model 6G6, serial number
200AET-C1043168 and model 6G6 Serial Number 200AET-X1043393, and two steel propellers.
These naval vessels were being guarded by two people who, when seeing th▯e armed forces, fled to
the south; they were not captured, but it was possible to ascertain that▯ one of the two people who
ran away was [Nicaraguan] citizen Agustín Reyes Aragón, who was fully identified by Commodore
Castañeda Arosteguí, who is familiar with this citizen’s connection to illegal activities, from
intelligence sources in the Police and in the Army. SEVENTH. On the fourth day of October in the
year two thousand and ten, the National Police of Nicaragua began an inv▯estigation into the crime
of Organized Crime, Fabrication, Trafficking, Holding, and Using Restricted Arms and Illegal
Financing of Psychotropic Narcotics and other Controlled Substances. During the investigation
undertaken in this case it was determined that the Honduran citizens arrested were the persons in
charge of the transfer of fuel, custody, and food to other boats that transported drugs on the high
seas and needed to be refueled to continue their route that runs from the south to the north in the
Caribbean sea, indicating citizen Agustín Reyes Aragón as the pers▯on who had contracted them to
perform such work. EIGHTH: In relation to the Nicaraguan citizen Agustín Reyes Aragón, with▯
Identification Card Number 604-050563-0000F, an investigation has been under way since the year
two thousand and eight in the area of the municipality of San Juan de Nicaragua, by the National
Police of Nicaragua; in the course of that investigation it was ascertained that there is a organization
of drug traffickers comprised of Agustín Reyes Aragón, Simeón Reyes Aragón,
387Annex 89
with Identification Card Number 601-0250273-003B, Alejandro Reyes Aragón, with Identification
Card Number 603-240469-0002S; Silvio Reyes Aragón, with Identification Card Number 604-
271167-0002X; these are known as “Los Tarzanes.” In the same intelligence work, the
aforementioned persons work with and rely on the citizens named Marcos Reñazco Padilla,
Miguel Reñazco Padilla, Carlos Padilla Oporta, and José Angel Padilla. In the case of the
Reñazco Padilla, they were investigated and indicted for the deaths of four members of the National
Police, which event occurred in the Bluefields Police Delegation, on the fourth of May of two
thousand and four, when they were on shift. The aforementioned persons have a police record of
drug trafficking of which they were convicted, having completed their sentence and been released.
NINTH: In the case of the “Los Tarzanes” group, through police intelligence work it was
ascertained that they are led by Agustín Reyes Aragón, these peopl▯e are hired by international drug
trafficking structures for logistical support and security when loading ▯drugs, specifically cocaine
that crosses from the south to the north through our jurisdictional waters on the Caribbe▯an coast,
where this band “Los Tarzanes” assume responsibility for performing the refueling work for the
boats coming from the South, and they also perform the work of receiving and storing cargos of
drugs to subsequently transfer those drugs to the north of the continent. In the case of citizens
Reñazco Padilla, they are used to drive the boats that Mr. Agustín Reyes Aragón uses, which they
hide in the Harbor Head area and its caños, for subsequent transfer on its route toward the North.
TENTH: As background, the National Police of Nicaragua has neutralized cases of drug trafficking
related to Agustín Reyes Aragón, among which I mention the following: In the middle of the year
two thousand and eight, a drug operation was performed in the place known as “Tiara Key,” where
fifteen kilos of cocaine and Two Hundred and Eighty Five Thousand Nine H▯undred and Forty
Dollars were seized; an AK rifle, a 38 revolver and two boats and their engines were also seized.
These drugs had been sold by Agustín Reyes Aragón, Simeón Reyes Aragón, Alejandro Reyes
Aragón, and Silvio Reyes Aragón. A second case that is known from intelligence information
related to Agustín Reyes Aragón is the seizure of forty-nine FAL rifles and 85 magazines with three
hundred and twenty projectiles seized in the Tiara Keys. It was ascertained that the destination of
these rifles was San Andrés Island; it was not possible to ascertain ▯the source of these rifles. But it
was determined that the rifles were transferred to the place, where they were seized by the National
Police, in a boat owned by Agustín Reyes Aragón. A third operation that involved Agustín Reyes
Aragón and the other three aforementioned persons was called Operation “Zapatera,” where the
388 Annex 89
seizure of two hundred and fifty kilos of cocaine was made. In this case Agustín Reyes Aragón and
three aforementioned people received the drugs on the high seas and then they delivered those d▯rugs
to an unidentified person who lives in the Department of Chontales; the Aragón brothers delivered
these drugs in the Rio San Juan area. This person transferred the drugs to Zapatera Island by boat;
that island is located in the area of Lago de Nicaragua. The drugs were seized by the National Police
in this area, but the person who hid the drugs on that island, when he detected the presence of the
police, left the drugs hidden in the place where the Police seized them. The last case that I am aware
of occurred in the year two thousand and nine, in the sector known as Kukalaya, jurisdiction of
Bluefields, where seven sacks containing cocaine were seized, for a tota▯l of two hundred and nine
kilos; these drugs were transferred to that location by Agustín Reyes▯ Aragón, with the support of
Simeón, Alejandro, and Silvio, all with surnames Reyes Aragón. These are the four cases that the
National Police of Nicaragua has investigated which, through intelligence work, implicate Agustín
Reyes Aragón and the three aforementioned people, as well as Marcos Reñazco Padilla and his
brothers. ELEVENTH. After the operations undertaken from the first through the fourth of O▯ctober
in the year two thousand and ten, when the six Honduran citizens were ar▯rested, and the two boats,
barrels of fuel and other evidence linked to the supplying of fuel to boats that transport drugs to the
north of the continent were seized, and as a result of this investigation, the participation of Agustín
Reyes Aragón and his aforementioned family members in this case was ascertained, as well as the
participation of Marcos Reñazco Padilla; a request for information was made at the end of the
month of October to Mr. Jorge Rojas, Director of the Judicial Investigation Agency ▯(OIJ) in Costa
Rica, which we attached to this Notarized Statement; as well as from Mr. Juan José Andrade,
Director of the Public Forces of Costa Rica. TWELFTH: The investigations undertaken by the
National Police together with Naval Intelligence of the Army of Nicaragua, were duly documented
and remitted to the Public Ministry, which took criminal action against the six Hondurans arrested
and against Agustín Reyes Aragón, who is currently a fugitive from▯ Nicaraguan justice. So stated
by the appearer, well instructed by Me the Notary, on the scope, value, and legal importance of this
act, its purpose, that of the general Clauses that ensure its validity, ▯that of the special ones that it
contains, that of those that involve waivers and explicit and implicit stipulations. I read this
document to the appearer, who is
389Annex 89
in agreement with it, approves, approves [sic] and ratifies. He signs together with me the Notary, I
certify everything that is stated. (s) F.I. ROA T. (s) Molina. Notary.
Executed before Me, from the front of Folio Number One Hundred and Thirt▯y-Eight (138)
to the reverse of Folio Number One Hundred and Forty (140) of my REGISTER
NUMBER TWENTY-THREE (23) which I keep in this year. And at the request of the
Ministry of Foreign Relations of the Republic of Nicaragua, I issue this FIRST OFFICIAL
COPY comprised of THREE (3) Used Pages, which I sign, seal, and stamp in the city of
Managua, at eight thirty o’clock a.m. on the sixteenth day of December in the year two
thousand and ten.
[stamp:] WALNER ABRAHAM MOLINA PEREZ
Attorney and Notary Public
REPNUOCAICAGUA
CENTARMALRICA
[signature]
390 Annex 89
[logo] [logo]
Republic of Nicaragua
NATIONAL POLICE
Legal Advice
“Always at your service”
PHOTOCOPY CERTIFICATION
The undersigned Deputy Chief of the Legal Advice Division of the National Police,
Commissioner Jaime Antonio Vanegas Vega, Attorney and Notary Public, certifies and
attests that the present photocopy conforms to its original which was duly collated and
corresponds to the Request for Cooperation from Mayor Commissioner Glenda Zavala
Peralta, Head of the Directorate of Legal Assistance of the National Police of Nicaragua,
to Mr. Jorge Rojas, Director of the Judicial Investigation Organization of Costa Rica, the
twenty-third of October in the year two thousand and ten, and contains two useful pages
that were signed, initialed, and sealed in the city of Managua, on the t▯wenty-seventh day
of December, in the year two thousand and ten.
[Signature; Seal]
Commissioner
JAIME ANTONIO VANEGAS VEGA
Deputy Chief of the Legal Advice Division
HONOR, SECURITY, SERVICE
Faustino Ruiz Building, Managua, Nicaragua, Tel. (505) 2774130-9 Ext.1049-1061 Fax. 1214
E-mail: [email protected]
391Annex 89
[logo] [logo]
Republic of Nicaragua
NATIONAL POLICE
Directorate of Legal Assistance
National Police…always at your service!
Managua 23 October 2010
Mr. Jorge Rojas
Director of the Judicial Investigation Organization (OIJ)
SAN JOSE, COSTA RICA
Release-
RE: Request for cooperation.
On the date 1 October 2010, at approximately 16:30 hours in an operation conducted by
the Naval Force of the Army of Nicaragua, against Organized Crime, in the area of Rio
Punta Roca to the north of Barra del Rio Maiz, in Nicaraguan territory, six individuals of
Honduran origin were captured, who were being pursued based on intelligence that they
were conducting activities linked to drug trafficking.
The captured people were:
1- Carlos Alberto Barrientos Lobo, age 29, laborer, and with domicile in
Sinai Colon, Honduras.
2- Policarpo Casildo Blanco, age 33, sailor, and with domicile in
Departamento Gracias a Dios, Honduras.
3- Pedro Alberto Ortega Ramirez, age 20, refrigerator technician, with
domicile in La Ceiba, Honduras.
4- José Israel Ayala Fúnez, age 45, laborer, and with domicile facing Hotel
Faria, La Ceiba, Honduras.
5- Lorenzo Casildo Alvarez, age 25, laborer, and with domicile in La Ceiba,
Honduras.
6- Rafael Antonio Garcia Rivera, age 38, farmer, and with domicile in
Colonia Esperanza, La Ceiba, Honduras.
In the same operation, a boat, 40 plastic barrels with a capacity of 60 gallons, and six
guns of different types and calibers were also seized from the arrested individuals.
The aforementioned arrested individuals were indicted for the crimes of FINANCING
OF NARCOTIC, PSYCOTROPIC AND CONTROLLED SUBSTANCESORGANIZED
392 Annex 89
CRIMES, AND OTHERS, according to the police file number 1188-2010. They are
currently in custody under the jurisdiction of the court of the Criminal District of
Bluefields, Autonomous Region of the South Atlantic (RAAS).
In the fulfillment of the investigations undertaken, the group known as “los Tarzane▯s”
was identified, comprised of the following individuals: Agustín Reyes Aragón, identif▯ied
with card number 604-050563-0000F, leader of the group, Ermenegildo Santos Reyes
Aragón, identified with identity card number 603-130454-0001Y, Alejandro Reyes
Aragón quo is identified with identity card number 603-240469-0002S, Simeón Eladio
Reyes Aragón, who is identified with identity card number 601-020273-0003B, José
Inocenic Reyes Aragón with identity card number 601-281275-0003M, Nicolás Antonio
Reyes Aragón, identity card number 601-100977-0001Q, Silvio Reyes Aragón, identity
card number 604-271167-0002X, all of Nicaraguan nationality, who, at the moment of
the operation, were participating together with the arrested individuals, in drug trafficking
activities, and during the pursuit fled and entered Costa Rican territory, from the southern
part of the municipality of San Juan de Nicaragua.
These individuals are accused of being responsible for crimes of organized crime, drug
trafficking, and others under Nicaragua’s criminal laws.
Based on the information and history known, we considered it important to alert you
about the dangers of these individuals.
Pursuant to the commitment and common interests of our countries to combat organized
crime and drug trafficking, as well as the mutual cooperation, assistance and exchange
between our police institutions, we request your support for the locatio▯n and arrest or
seizure of the above-referenced people, requesting that we please be inf▯ormed about any
news about these issues.
All of the foregoing is for the purpose of law enforcement and the judicial formalities still
pending against these individuals in our country.
I thank you for your attention, and I reiterate my highest consideration and esteem.
Attentively,
[Signature; Seal]
Mayor Commissioner
Glenda Anabell Zavala Peralta
Head of the Directorate of Legal Assistance
National Police of Nicaragua
393394 Annex 90
Declaration of Elsa Maria Vivas Soto, Agrocultural Engineer,
General Department of Environmental Quality of the Ministry
of the Environment and Natural Resources
20 December 2010
395396 Annex 90
[seal] Government of National
REPUBLIC OF NICARAGUA
CENTRAL AMERICA Reconciliation and Unity
The People, President!
DECLARATION OF ELSA MARIA VIVAS SOTO, AGROCULTURAL ENGINEER,
GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY OF THE MINISTRY
OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
1. My name is Elsa María Vivas Soto and I am an Agricultural Engineer, with a Master’s in
Environmental Management. I work for the Ge neral Department of Environmental Quality
(DGCA) of the Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources (MARENA).
2. My position is Specialist in Environm ental Management, for which I have the
professional skills that DGCA requires for perfor ming the work of a technician in charge of
inspecting projects that require an Environmental Permit, the principal functions being:
answering requests for projects, wo rks, or activities that require an environmental permit that
DGCA receives and reviews in accordance with th e precepts of the Environmental Assessment
System; supporting the MARENA Territorial Offices when so required, with supervision for
compliance with the environmental requirement s established in the Environmental Permits
issued; preparing regulatory inst ruments regarding environmental quality; and participating on
institutional and inter-institutional committees. Likewise I am part of the inter-institutional
technical team that evaluated the Environmental Impact Study for the IMPROVEMENT OF
NAVIGATION ON THE SAN JUAN DE NICARAGUA RIVER Project.
3. The National Port Company of Nicaragua (EPN) requested au thorization for an
Addendum to the project called IMPROVEMENT OF NAVIGATION ON THE SAN JUAN
DE NICARAGUA RIVER, related to cleaning a caño [i.e., small channel] that connects the San
Juan river to the Habor Head lagoon.
4. Based on the aforementioned request, I made two visits to the site, the first being between
September 7 and 8 of 2009, and the second from November 24 to 26, 2010.
5. My inspection visits were made under th e direction of the General Department of
Environmental Quality (DGCA) and the Director of MARENA’ s Department of Environmental
Evaluation and Protection, as part of the procedures established in the Environmental
Assessment System of Nicaragua, to answer a nd process the request for an environmental
permit.
September 2009 Visit
6. I made my first visit in the company of me mbers of EPN, and the objective of the visit
was to inspect the site where EPN wanted to perform the activities indicated in the Addendum to
the project IMPROVEMENT OF NAVIGATION ON THE SAN JUAN DE NICARAGUA
RIVER.
7. The information presented by EPN established that one of its expansion activities would
397Annex 90
consist in the cleaning of the caño that connects the San Juan River to the Harbor Head Lagoon,
in Nicaraguan territory, which was going to be performed with manual equipment (through the
use of shovels, pickaxes and manual saws), to recover navigability in a section of approximately
1,560 meters.
8. My visit started at MARENA’s Management Ce nter Office, located in the Municipality
of San Juan de Nicaragua. We proceeded to vis it the facility where the local administration and
management office for the project’s operations was located, which belongs to EPN, and after that
we started the inspection tour of the caño, which was mostly performed in a small boat, the
starting point being the Harbor Head Lagoon.
9. While we were traveling through the caño, the fluidity of the water could be seen, which
allowed small vessels such as the boat that we were in to navigate up to a certain point. The caño
had a width of some five mete rs, surrounded by a riparian, floode d forest. We traveled through
the caño until we found a layer of sediment and dried fallen trees that prevented the passage of
water and transportation toward the San Juan Rive r side [of the caño], thus affecting the flow
volume, the depth and the width of the caño. Due to this sedimentation of the section, we were
forced to continue the trip on foot, because th e sedimentation made navigation through the caño
difficult.
10. The need to remove the sediment to restor e the flow volume of th e caño was visible, so
that it could again flow from the Lagoon to its natural mouth in the San Juan River. The need to
remove the vegetation that obstructed the caño was also visible, to improve its navigability as
part of the sustainable development of the region.
11. Based on the field inspection, together with the information in the Addendum presented
by EPN, I was able to determine that the work would be environmentally viable for the following
reasons:
• The activities would be performed using traditional methods, which would cause low,
insignificant and reversible environmental impacts.
• The weather conditions and the type of ecosystems would allow for the natural
regeneration of the plant life on the banks of the caño; principally pioneer and rapid-
growth species.
• The sediment extracted from the manual cleaning would not represent any danger to the
natural species of the area because the soil is silty, the plant material is organic, and when
it is deposited in another site it would aid in the natural regeneration of plant species.
• The impacts on the water quality are considered low-intensity, which would only
temporarily affect, for example, parameters such as: transparency, color, and turbidity
due to suspended sediment; this quality would return once the activities were over.
• Moreover the activities would be performed under the cond itions to be established in the
environmental permit.
398 Annex 90
12. With respect to a change in the hydrological regime, it was obvious that the proposed
project was limited, very specific and it would not be capable of significantly altering the natural
characteristics of the area (that is, the River or the Lagoon), because the recovery of the natural
flow volume of the caño does not represent any risk, either to the river or to the Lagoon, taking
into account that the volume of water that flows through the caño is insignificant compared to the
volume of water that flows through the San Juan river.
13. Upon completing the visit I informed my MA RENA colleagues that the recovery of the
navigability of the caño, by clearing it under certain conditions, was legal and environmentally
viable, because it would comply with the applicable legal standards.
I attach as ANNEX I photographs taken during this first visit.
November 2010 Visit
14. I made my second inspection visit in the company of members of EPN and the
MARENA delegates for San Juan de Nicaragua. The visit cons isted of evaluating compliance
with the conditions established in the E nvironmental Permit granted by MARENA for the
Addendum to the IMPROVEMENT OF NAVIGATION ON THE SAN JUAN DE
NICARAGUA RIVER project issued under Administrative Resolution No. 38-2008, and its
expansion under Administrative Resolution No. 38-2008-A1.
15. The visit began in the facilities of the pr oject office located in San Juan de Nicaragua;
from there we went to the site, located off the San Juan River, where the caño clearing activity
was being performed.
16. In a brief meeting, prior to starting the trip through the caño, I had the opportunity to
speak with project personnel and the environmental specialist that EPN had designated to ensure
environmental supervision and compliance. In my capacity as representative of the
environmental authority (MARENA), I explained to them the objec tives of the visit, which was
aimed at the environmental control and monitori ng of the expansion activities started and the
verification and evaluation of compliance with the conditions established in the permit.
17. On that occasion, our entire trip through th e caño was undertaken in a small boat, from
the San Juan River to the Harbor Head Lagoon. Th e caño area near the river, which a year ago
was filled with sediment, had become a section navigable by small boats. The depth at the time
of my visit was between 1 to 1.20 meters.
18. While we advanced we were able to see that the workers, who were performing the caño
clearing activities, were civilia ns, workers from the area, with manual equipment, such as
shovels, pickaxes and buckets. Fine dirt, branches and parts of trees that were in the caño were
being extracted, without using machinery, dredging equipment, or other specialized equipment,
according to the information presented by EPN a nd in accordance with the requirements of the
MARENA resolution.
399Annex 90
19. At that time I saw a manual saw, which was not being used, however it is worth
mentioning that it can be used to cut down trees, branches, and roots embedded in the water,
typical of flood-prone forests.
20. I did not see any worker present on the Cost a Rican bank of the ca ño, nor did I see any
destruction of vegetation on the Costa Rican side indicating that it was done during the cleaning
activities.
21. In some specific areas, within the area cove red by the trip, I was able to see that some
trees were being cut down, which had to be cut down to be able to finish clearing the caño. That
cutting represented a minimum impact, because it was very limited and they would be replanted
using a ratio of ten trees for every one cut down, according to MARENA’s orders.
22. During the trip, we also saw that the wo rkers were extracting from the caño small
amounts of sediment (sandy and silty soil), pieces of roots and trees and they were placing them
on the Nicaraguan bank, in order to be moved to mo re stable sites at a distance of between 30
and 50 meters from the bank, so as to avoid thei r returning to the rive r through runoff. During
my visit I did not see any debris at all deposited on the Costa Rican bank of the caño.
23. At no time did we see the construction or presence of permanent encampments of any
type. The only thing that was seen was the work of a group of laborers who live in the area, who
were working in different shifts, comprised of be tween 60 to 80 people per shift, due to the type
of physical cleaning activity.
24. All of the workers traveled daily on boats from the town of San Juan de Nicaragua to the
cleaning site. We also saw in the area near the ca ño that no stores of fuel were kept that could
jeopardize the quality of water or the area. The pr ogress of the cleaning activities in the caño at
the time of the visit was approximately 50%.
25. In general, based on the information provided by EPN, as well as my own detailed tour
through the area, I reached the conclusion that the work was being performed in accordance with
the requirements of the Environmental Permit, which I reported to MARENA as required by
internal regulations.
I attach as ANNEX II photographs taken during this second visit.
Given in the city of Managua on the twentieth day of the month of December of the year two
thousand and ten.
[signature]
Elsa María Vivas Soto, Engineer
Specialist in Environmental Management
General Department of Environmental Quality, MARENA
400 Annex 90
Annex I Photos
The tour began at c
Harbor Head Lagoon.c
Photo 1. Tour through
a section of the cañco
that was still navicgable.
Photo 2. From this
point on, navigation
begins to be difficult.c
The tour was conductced
in two small boats.c
401Annex 90
Photo 3. Section of the
caño with sedimentvation.
The tree branches havnging
over the caño's chanvnel
impeded continuation of the
tour in the small bovat.
402 Annex 90
Annex II Photos
Deposits of small quañntities of sedimentñs
Vegetation (Yolillo and grass) when
entering the caño fñrom the San Juan and tree branches ñon the Nicaraguan ñbank
River
Manual cleaning work
Manual cleaning work
403Annex 90
Sediment deposits lon the Nicaraguan lshore; observe the lsmall hills and
adjacent area with little vegetation due to other activities.
Workers on the Niclaraguan bank of thel caño, adjacent arela without vegetatioln
(trees). Observe thel natural regeneratilon.
404 Annex 90
On the Nicaraguan vshore, area affectved Observe area with sovme felled trees.
by human activities vwith little Observe also the typve of soil (sandy), v
vegetation, not cauvsed by the cleaning v
firm land (not floovded).
activities. The bavnk was only used to v
deposit sediments vand tree branches. v
Observe another areva on the Nicaraguavn
More conserved areav, where
side with felled treves on the bank. some tree branches vand trunks
are deposited.
405Annex 90
Observe the uncleañred state, in the ñMangrove-type vegetñation at the exit oñf
intermediate part oñf the caño, with
sedimentation (without clearing the caño towards Harñbor Head
activity)
406 Annex 91
El Nuevo Diario, Press Notice of the Availability of the
Environmental Impact Document for the Project
“Dredging of the San Juan River”
7 August 2006
407408 Annex 91
[EPN logo] [MARENA logo]
GOVERNMENT OF NICARAGUA
NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT DOCUMENT
DREDGING OF THE SAN JUAN RIVER
MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES MARENA
Informs the general public that the Empresa Por tuaria Nacional [National Port Company] –
EPN, has requested an Environmental Permit for the Dredging project of the San Juan River.
The Environmental Impact Document will be available for consultation by any interested party,
th th
from Wednesday the 9 to Tuesday the 15 of August of this year, in the following locations at
the following times:
MARENA DELEGATION FOR THE SAN JUAN RIVER, from 8AM to 5PM,
TOWN HALL OF EL CASTILLO, from 8AM to 5PM,
TOWN HALL OF SAN JUAN DEL NORTE, from 8 AM to 5PM,
th th th th
AnthWednesday the 9 , Friday the 11 , Monday the 14 , Tuesday the 15 and Wednesday the
16 of August of this year at:
DOCUMENTATION CENTER AT MARENA CENTRAL, Kilometer 12.5 highway north,
Managua, from 8AM to 5PM.
Opinions regarding the environmental impacts of the project should be made in writing and
submitted to the Dirección General de Calidad Ambiental [Department of Environmental
Quality] (DGCA) of MARENA, Post Office Box No. 5123, duly signed by their authors who
must record their relevant particulars, until Monday, the 14 of August, 2006.
[logo] Government of Nicaragua
Ministry of the Environment
and Natural Resources
[Handwritten: El Nuevo Diario, Edition No. 9332, Monday, 7 August 2006, page 4B]
409410 Annex 92
Ticotimes.net, “Costa Rican Police Forces Sent to Nicaraguan Border”
22 October 2010 (1)
El Nuevo Diario, Nicaragua Encourages Costa Ricans to join the
military reserves on the anniversary of the abolition of the Costa Rican▯ army
1 December 2010. (2)
411412 Annex 92
Ticotimes.net, “Costa Rican Police Forces Sent to Nicaraguan Border”
22 October 2010 (1)
http://www.ticotimes.net/Current-Edition/News-Briefs/Costa-Rican-Police…-
to-Nicaraguan-Border_Friday-October-22-2010
Costa Rican Police Forces Sent to Nicaraguan Border
Posted: Friday, October 22, 2010 - By Adam Williams
BREAKING NEWS UPDATE: Costa Rican police arrive near Río San Juan.
Costa Rican policemen load supplies onto a plane at Base 2 of the Juan Santa Maria airport in
San Jose, on October 22, 2010. Tensions on the Costa Rica -Nicaragua border grew on
Thursday evening regarding the dredging of the San Juan river. Costa Rican authorities are
accusing the neighbouring country of dumping sediments on their side while residents of the
area have reported Nicaraguan intrusion. AFP PHOTO/ Yuri CORTEZ
Costa Rican policemen load supplies onto a plane at Base 2 of the Juan Santa Maria airport in
San Jose, on October 22, 2010. Tensions on the Costa Rica -Nicaragua border grew on
Thursday evening regarding the dredging of the San Juan river. Costa Rican authorities are
accusing the neighbouring country of dumping sediments on their side while residents of the
area have reported Nicaraguan intrusion. AFP PHOTO/ Yuri CORTEZ
Early this morning, about 70 members of the Costa Rican National Police boarded planes a t
Juan Santamaría International Airport near San José and flew to the Barra del Colorado
airstrip in the northeast corner of the country, near the Nicaraguan border. The deployment of
413Annex 92
police to the zone was ordered by the Security Ministry. On Thursday eve ning, the ministry
said that Costa Rica would send officers to investigate reports that Nicaraguan troops had
entered Costa Rican territory along the Río San Juan, which forms the eastern portion of the
border between the two countries.
According to a statement from the foreign minster's office, the reason for the deployment was
to “assure the safety of Costa Rican citizens” near the border and to investigate the legitimacy
of reports by residents of the zone of intrusions by the Nicaraguan military into Costa Rican
territory.
On Thursday, Marco Reyes, who owns a 210- hectare farm along the Río San Juan, told The
Tico Times that Edén Pastora, known as Comandante Cero, had entered into his property
during the week and claimed that the land belonged to Nicaragua. Pastora, who is a Sandinista
revolutionary hero, said that Nicaragua needed the land for the dredging of the Río San Juan,
which began Monday in San Juan del Norte, at the mouth of the river at the southern end of
Nicaragua's Caribbean coast.
In an interview with a Nicaraguan television network, La Prensa TV, Pastora stated that the
land, which is on Isla Calero in northeast Costa Rica, “doesn’t belong to anyone” and that “no
one had defined the border” between the two countries.
“We have received several reports of Nicaraguan activity on the Costa Rican side of the Río
San Juan,” said Costa Rican Security Minister José María Tijerino in a press conference
Thursday night. “We plan to go to the region to assess the reports and assure that no further
harm is done to Costa Rican land or citizens.”
On Thursday, the foreign minister’s office submitted a formal protest to the Nicaraguan
ambassador in Costa Rica, Harold Rivas, demanding that Nicaragua cease the dredging until
the issues of reported harm to Costa Rican interests was addressed. The protest claimed that
the dredging had resulted in large amounts of sediments being pushed to the Costa Rican side
of the river and that several Costa Rican citizens had reported damages to goods and property.
On Friday, a representative of the Nicaraguan Embassy in San José told The Tico Times that
Rivas would not issue a response to the Costa Rican protest until a later date.
According to the personnel of several fishing lodges in Barra del Colorado, dozens of armed
Costa Rican police in military fatigues were participating in training activities on the village
soccer field, in the small town's center. Throughout the day, helicopters and planes came and
left the Barra del Colorado airstrip, reportedly to get aerial views of activities along the Río
San Juan, north of the town.
“We are hearing very loud helicopters and planes,” said RoseAnne Cody, the general manager
of the Silver King Lodge in Barra del Colorado. “It is not our quiet little village anymore.”
For daily updates on the border conflict along the Río San Juan, visit www.ticotimes.net
414 Annex 92
El Nuevo Diario, Nicaragua Encourages Costa Ricans to join the
military reserves on the anniversary of the abolition of the Costa Rican▯ army
1 December 2010. (2)
December 1, 2010
Encourages Costa Ricans to join the military reserves on the anniversary of the
abolition of the Costa Rican army
San José, Costa Rica | END
Chinchilla calls Ortega a coward
* In a strong speech, she ordered to accelerate the formation of the Border Police and
meanwhile further militarizes the border zone
* Police posts located at the mouth of Rio Colorado and at the mouth of the San Carlos and
Sarapiquí rivers will be boosted.
Sixto Valladares | National news
President Laura Chinchilla instructed the security minister to send more police forces to the
Nicaraguan border, especially to increase surveillance in the posts located near Rio Colorado,
while calling the acts of President Ortega bully -boy acts, and “only cowards are valiant with
the defenseless”.
“I have instructed the public security minister (José María Tijerino) to boost the police
presence along the northern border, without affecting at all our compliance of the resolution
approved by the OAS over the zone of Isla Portillo in Calero Island”, announced Chinchilla in
an act to celebrate the abolition of the Costa Rican army.
“Special attention will be received by the posts located at the mouth of Rio Colorado and at
the mouth of the San Carlos and Sarapiqui rivers, as well as patrolling in the Barra del
Colorado and Tortuguero channels”, she added.
“I have also asked to speed up the process of formation of the border police through special
training sessions that will be received by a group of securitofficers”, indicated Chinchilla,
who asked Costa Ricans to join the reserves of the security force.
The deployment of more Costa Rican troops was announced two days after Daniel Ortega
indicated that part of the San Juan River near Rio Colorado will be dredged in mid-December.
Earlier, Ortega had expressed interest in asking the International Court of Justice to grant
Nicaraguans the right to navigate on the Colorado River while the San Juan River wa s
dredged.
415Annex 92
Call to Reserve
“I also asked to speed up the process of formation of the border poli ce through special
training sessions that will be received by a group of security officers”, added Chinchilla, who
asked Costa Ricans to join the reservesof the security force.
In the same speech, Chinchilla said that “we will not allow, listen carefully , any more
violations to our territorial integrity”.
Earlier, Chinchilla said that “today let me remind these gentlemen in the north with their
overblown words, bully-boy acts and use of force, I want to remind them that only cowards
are valiant with the defenseless. We will not allow, listen carefully, any more violations to our
sovereignty and territorial integrity”.
“We will not be derailed by the shenanigans and whims of political leaders from other
confines. It will not be those who will steer us awa y from our country’s almost sacred
tradition (of not having an army). We will not be dragged by their repeated provocations into
scenarios of violence and aggression to which they are accustomed”, she added.
While Chinchilla read a bellicose speech, Foreign Minister René Castro continued to hold
briefing meetings in New York with delegations from the member States of the UN Security
Council.
416 Annex 93
El 19 Digital, “Nicaragua will go to The Hague for delimitation of the
border with Costa Rica”
available at http://www.el19digital.com/index.php?option=
com_content&view=article&catid=23:nacionales&id=17616:
presidente-de-nicaragua-sentara-posicion-oficial-sobre-tema-del-
rio-san-juan&Itemid=12
2 November 2010
417418 Annex 93
Government committed to peace
Nicaragua will go to The Hague for delimitation of the border with Costa Rica
2 November 2010 | El 19 Digital
The president of Nicaragua, Commander Daniel Ortega Saavedra announced that our country
will go to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague to clearly defin e the border
with Costa Rica, which aims to take over our San Juan River, source of National Pride.
The Nicaraguan president made the announcement late this Tuesday, after Costa Rica’s threat
of wanting to go to the Organization of American States (OAS) to get Nicaragua to stop the
cleanup of the San Juan River and withdraw the troops that are protecting the south of our
territory from the presence of drugtraffickers.
On that topic, he pointed out that it is n ot up to the OAS to rule on issues of border
delimitation between countries, that it is falls under the jurisdiction of the ICJ.
In addition, he confirmed that Nicaragua will not stop the cleanup of our San Juan River, or
the fight against drug trafficking, which is a fight of principles, said the president.
“I want to officially m ake it known that Nicaragua will take the appropriate steps, in the
immediate future, to present this case before the International Court of Justice in The Hague
and then may the Court say who is right (...) don’t let weapons say it, don’t let threats say it,
419Annex 93
let the Court say it; it is the one that has the power to do so, that has the tools to do so, that has
the information to do so, the OAS does not have any of that”, Daniel said in announcing the
official position of the Government of Nicaragua on this topic.
The president read excerpts of the Judgment of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The
Hague, about the rights of our nation over the San Juan River. In it, the supreme rule of our
country over the River is recognized and the Nicaraguan people are granted the power to
dredge or cleane this body of water.
“Nicaragua has the right to dredge the San Juan in order to return the flow of water to that
obtaining in 1858 even if this affects the flow of water to other present day recipients of this
flow such as the Colorado River “, indicates the Judgment of The Hague, read by the
Nicaraguan president.
Imperialist interests
President Daniel affirmed that our country has been the victim of foreig n imperialist interests
that want to make us lose more Nicaraguan territory at our borders.
Commander Daniel noted that , historically, foreign imperialist powers have sought to make
Nicaragua lose its territory, and that Colombia is currently signing agreements with Honduras
and Costa Rica for this verypurpose.
“It has been in the geopolitical vision of Costa Rica, fueled by Colombia, to take over the San
Juan River”, the president categorically stated.
He denied that cleaning our river is affecting Costa Rican territory. He further noted that this
work will have its greatest impact when coming closer to the mouth of the San Juan, which is
also Nicaraguan territory.
He also affirmed that Nicaragua has reinforced military presence in some areas of the San
Juan River where drug traffickers have tried to cross theborder.
He reiterated the need to form a binational commission to clearly establish, through the
placement of markers, the border between Nicaragua and Costa Rica.
“They're sending a belligerent message in Costa Rica, there is a belligerent message in Costa
Rica”, he said, even though that country says it has no army.
He stated that these belligerent messages are not appropriatein Latin America, when what one
is looking for is the solution of conflicts in a peaceful way.
Government committed to peace
He recalled that historically, Nicaragua has always turnedto The Hague, which has resulted in
rulings favorable for our country.
420 Annex 93
He further affirmed that Nicaragua is not falling for any provocation, despite the fact that
Costa Rica has doubled its milita ry presence along the border and the Costa Rican media are
presenting a ficticious war atmosphere.
If only this movement of Costa Rican “military forces” to the area were to combine forces
with Nicaragua to fight drug trafficking, he said.
That is why there must be a definitive delimitation of the border, through the placement of
markers, he said.
“We submit to the judge, we do not submit to force, or the use of force”, he explained.
He hopes that Costa Rican President Laura Chinchilla shares this view, as well as her
officials.
Moreover, he called on comrade Dennis Moncada, Ambassador of Nicaragua to the OAS , to
address the organization this Wednesday to confirm this position worthy of our nation.
This is a government that wants Peace and that is committed to those sacred lyrics of our
National Anthem, which read that the blood of our brothers should no longer flow, not only of
Nicaraguans, but of Central Americans and Latin Americans, he said.
“The outcome should not be a n outcome of confrontation, not a single drop of blood should
flow here, there must be an outcome and the challenge we give the Costa Rican authorities, is
to go to the International Court of Justice in The Hague”, he pronounced.
421422 Annex 94
A.M. Costa Rica Third NewsPage, Costa Rica mobilizes troops
along Nicaraguan line, available at
http://www.amcostarica.com/102210.htm
(last visited 21 July 2012)
22 October 2010
423424 Annex 94
http://www.amcostarica.com/102210.htm
A.M. Costa Rica
Your daily English-language news source -Monday through Friday
Costa Rica mobilizes troops along Nicaraguan line
By the A.M. Costa Rica staff
Posted at 12:45 p.m.
Costa Rica has begun a military operation along its northern border in response to reports that
Nicaraguan soldiers have entered an area along the Río San Juan, ran off farm workers, killed
cattle and began dredging.
The security ministry released this photo Friday of dredging operations on the San Juan
Barra del Colorado, the small village in northeast Costa Rica, has become an armed camp.
The local community center has been taken over as a command center, and security ministry
aircraft, fixed wing and helicopters, are making numerous flights.
At least 50 security ministry troops are on the ground, and many are in battle dress with heavy
weaponry, said reports from the community.
The Barra del Colorado airport was closed to civil ian flights earlier today. Planes were
diverted to Tortugero.
Costa Rica does not have an army, but Fuerza Pública officers resembled soldiers. They were
wearing battle helmets, carrying M -16 rifles and a few weapons described as 50 -caliber
machine guns. Some are practicing dismounting from a helicopter, the reports said. Many are
dressed in camouflage and wearing bullet-proof vests that say "Police."
In Nicaragua, Eden Pastora, the ex -guerrilla who is in charge of the dredging operation,
claimed today on television that an island in the San Juan really belongs to his country. Costa
Rica says that the island is Tico soil. It is leased by the government to a farmer, whose son
reported being threatened by Nicaraguan troops as long ago as Oct. 8.
425Annex 94
Costa Rican troops were being brought to the staging area by the newly remodeled Caribou
aircraft. Officials were making overflights of the disputed zone with helicopters.
José María Tijerino, the security minister, said Thursday night that Costa Rica has filed a
formal protest with Nicaragua over the dredging operation, which seeks to deepen the mouth
of the Río San Juan where it enters the Caribbean. Tijerino said that the material dredged from
the river was being depositing via a 12-inch pipe onto Costa Rican soil.
The river is the boundary between the two countries, but the international line is on the south
bank.
He made no mention of an impending military action. President Laura Chinchilla told
reporters earlier Friday that the troop deployment was preventative.
Barra del Colorado residents have been prohibited from visiting the community center, and
red cones have been set out as a line of restriction.
426 Annex 95
TicoTimes.net, Adam Williams, “Tough talk as Costa Rica - Nicaragua
border tightens”
14 January 2011
427428 Annex 95
Tough talk as Costa Rica - Nicaragua border tightens - Printable Version Page 1 of 3
Tough talk as Costa Rica - Nicaragua border tightens
Posted: Friday, January 14, 2011 - By Adam Williams
While the case against Nicaragua entered the World Court in the Netherlands, the president and Security
Ministry made defensive moves along the northern border, vowing to construct roadways, fences and heliports
at spots along the Río San Juan.
AFP
International showdown: The Río San Juan dispute reaches The Hague, Netherlands.
As the border dispute between Costa Rica and Nicaragua went before the International Court of Justice this
week in the Netherlands, Costa Rican President Laura Chinchilla and Public Security Minister José María
Tijerino took steps at home that indicate an increased concern for security along the border.
Last weekend, Tijerino announced that work had begun in late December to enhance security along three
Costa Rican rivers that join the Río San Juan, which serves as the bordetween Nicaragua and Costa Rica.
The Costa Rican government will set up heliports where the Colorado, Saripiquí and San Carlos rivers join the
Río San Juan. Tijerino said the heliports will be used to facilitate government air traffic and to monitor security
along the border. The only existing airstrip near the border is located in Barra del Colorado, in the northeast
corner of the Limón province on the Colorado River.
“If Costa Rica doesn’t take seriously the need to protect its territory, not only we are going to continue living in
situations as terrible as the last few months, but also drug trafficking will continue unabated,” Chinchilla said
Tuesday .
http://www.ticotimes.net/layout/set/print/Current-Edition/Top-Story/New…-... 7/16/2012
429Annex 95
Tough talk as Costa Rica - Nicaragua border tightens - Printable Version Page 2 of 3
The Public Security Ministry also announced plans to install fences around the border’s river deltas to control
access in an around the area. New roads will provide better access to border regions. According to the Public
Works Ministry, an estimated $2 million will be invested on infrastructure projects to facilitate travel to border
communities near the conflict zone, which are currently only accessible by boat.
“We will do whatever it takes,” Tijerino told the daily La Nación. “The government has decided to defend
territorial integrity. We will be thorough with our defense efforts to defend the sovereignty of national territory.”
Tijerino added that the added security measures would be permanent, and any unidentified boats entering
Costa Rican territory would be intercepted.
In addition to the new security measures along the border, Chinchilla told members of the press on Tuesday
that a potential “national defense tax” may be created to pay for the cost of the increased border security
efforts.
Chinchilla said that the number of police forces on the border will likely increase in the next two months. In
2008, former President Osca r Arias reduced the number of border police.
“This government’s goal is to have a trained police force along the border,” Chinchilla said Tuesday. “To do so,
it is very probable that part of the upcoming fiscal reform will include a national defense tax to fund these
efforts.”
In many border towns, including Barra del Colorado, police presence is scarce in normal times, and those
officers that are working there say they often feel powerless to stop crime. Last October, the police force in
Barra del Colorado dropped from three to two for a population of 3,000 residents (TT, Oct. 15, 2010).
The Costa Rican plan to boost border security comes only weeks after Nicaraguan lawmakers passed a
defense-law package that included a National Defense Law, National Security Law and Border Law. Those
laws could result in further militarization of the Nicaraguan side of the border (NT, Dec. 14, 2010).
Will Court Ruling Help?
On Tuesday, Costa Rica presented its case against Nicaragua at the world court in The Hague. The Costa
Rican delegation presented satellite imagery contained in a report by the United Nations Institute for Training
and Research (UNITAR). Costa Rica commissioned the UNITAR report late last year, and shared it with a
handful of Costa Rican environmentalists who signed non-disclosure forms that prevented them from
commenting before the case went to trial.
Costa Rican Foreign Minister René Castro hoped input from local environmentalists would help boost the
countr y’s case against Nicaragua’s destruction of protected wetlands near the border (TT, Dec. 24, Dec. 17,
2010) .
The UNITAR report compares satellite images of the Isla Calero during a time frame from 1979 to 2010 to
reveal recent environmental alteration to the region, while also alluding to potential effects of the river
dredging .
“There is apparently an area of active land removal on a [bend] of the San Juan River approximately 400
meters to the south of the newly created channel,” the report says. “If the removal continues, it could redirect
the flow of San Juan approximately 175 meters to the west, likely increasing river flow velocity downstream;
such an increase in water velocity could also have the effect of accelerating erosion along the newly created
river channel to the north.”
The report noted that a morphological review of the area was conducted in 1979, 1986, 2005, and from 2007
to 2010. The images show that the area had been relatively stable during the last 30 years, with few
indications of change until the late months of 2010.
“Based on an analysis of satellite imagery recorded on Nov. 19 and Dec. 14, 2010, there is strong evidence
that a new river channel leading from the San Juan River to the Los Portillos lagoon was constructed between
August and November 2010.”
Castro posted on his Facebook page that “there aren’t rivers, nor have there ever been rivers between the San
Juan and the Los Portillos lagoon on the Isla Calero.”
Nicaragua also presented its case, claiming that Costa Rica “creates a dispute” every time Nicaragua begins
work on the Río San Juan” (see separate story, P. 7). Carlos Argüello, a member of the Nicaraguan
delegation, said undefined international borders caused the dispute.
http://www.ticotimes.net/layout/set/print/Current-Edition/Top-Story/New…-... 7/16/2012
430 Annex 95
Tough talk as Costa Rica - Nicaragua border tightens - Printable Version Page 3 of 3
After Tuesday’s hearings, Castro said he was confident Costa Rica had presented a strong case during its first
day of court
“We laid out our arguments,” he said. “There has been irreversable damage done to Costa Rican territory and
we feel the court has heard our arguments. Our position is very consistent, as it has been since this issue
began.”
President Chinchilla agreed: “The more the world knows about this situation, the more the world will agree with
Costa Rica,” she said.
http://www.ticotimes.net/layout/set/print/Current-Edition/Top-Story/New…-... 7/16/2012
431432 Annex 96
La Prensa, Nicaragua, “Costa Rican Foreign Minister
starts tour against Nicaragua”
17 January 2011
433434 Annex 96
(17 January 2011)
Costa Rican Foreign Minister startstour against Nicaragua
By Josué Bravo
CORRESPONDENT / COSTA RICA
Today in London, UK, the Costa Rican Foreign Minister, René Castro, started a tour o f
several European nations to speak about what he considers a Nicaraguan military invasion, in
addition to asking for suspension of aid t o Nicaragua as a means of pressure, as he has
previously stated.
During his visit to London, Castro was received at the British Foreign Office by Henry
Bellingham, Minister of State responsible for United Nations and Conflict Issues, with whom
he discussed issues of the bilateral agenda and spoke about the implications of the conflict
with Nicaragua.
“Foreign Minister Castro spoke of the diplomatic efforts being made by the country aimed at
achieving the immediate withdrawal of the Nicaraguan troops from (what this country
considers to be) Costa Rican territory ”, the Costa Rican Ministry of Foreign Affairs
informed.
“He also spoke about the hearing held recently before the International Court of Justice and
the need for the Court to issue the requested provisional measures aimed at stopping the
serious devastation”, added the Ministry.
435436 Annex 97
EFE, “Deputies call the Foreign Minister of Costa Rica
a ‘bully’ and ‘outdated’”
20 September 2011
437438 Annex 97
20 September 2011
Managua, Nicaragua | EFE
Deputies call the Foreign Minister of Costa
Rica a “bully” and “outdated”
In response to statements he made about the government of Nicaragua last week
By elnuevodiario.com.ni | Nacionales
The Foreign Minister of Costa Rica, Enrique Castillo. ARCHIVE / END
Deputies of Nicaragua today branded the foreign minister of Costa Rica Enrique Casti"ao
bully" and " outdated". L ast week he called the government of Daniel Ortega, whom he
accused of invading Costa Rican territory in October 2010, a "xenophobic enemy".
The head of the Sandinista parliamentary group in the National Assembly of Nicaragua,
Edwin Castro, said today that Castillo's statements have “no basis whatsoever”.
“These positions are outdated”, Castro told reporters.
Castillo, in statements published lastSaturday b y Costa Rican newspaper La Nació n,
criticized the Ortega government for what he called an “invasion” by Nicaragua of a wetland
that Costa Rica considers to be in its Caribbean territory of Isla Portillos.
“I think we have to consider (the Nicaraguan government) as an enemy as long as they keep
usurping” the Costa Rican territory, Castillo confirmed.
439Annex 97
“There is a vengeful motivation, which is based on xenophobia tha t the Ortega government
feeds to the Nicaraguan people, which is also practiced by the Nicaraguan Government. It's a
xenophobic government against Costa Rica”, the official added.
Given this statement, today Nicaraguan liberal opposition legislator Wilfredo Navarro
described the foreign minister of Costa Rica as “irresponsible” and “a bully”.
“He contradicts the behavior of the Costa Rican people, who are civil people and (Cast illo)
definitely is a bully, gangster style, who thinks he can intimidate Nicaragua”, said Navarro.
He maintained that the Nicaraguans do not want a war, but stressed that they know “how to
respond firmly and rigorously to any attack”on their sovereignty.
Meanwhile, the President of the National Assembly of Nicaragua, Sandinista deputy René
Núñez, called for waiting for the International Court of Justice to resolve the conflict.
“We will not support any militaristic action”, he said thereon.
The Nicaraguan deputies referred to the matter at the end of a formal meeting in the San
Jacinto hacienda, 42 kilometers north of Managua.
During the meeting this Tuesday, legislators commemorated the 155th anniversary of the
Battle of San Jacinto, whe re General Jos é Dolores Estrada , at the head of 180 patriots ,
defeated the troops of American filibuster William Walker, who sought to take over Central
America.
Nicaragua and Costa Rica maintain a territorial dispute since last October, when the latter
accused Nicaragua of invading the wetland Managua knowsas Harbor Head with military and
civilians and causing environmental damage to it.
The case is in the hands of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague , which last
March ordered the two countries to refrain from sending security personnel, military or
civilian, to the disputed area, and called upon them to coordinate their actions against drug
trafficking and organized crime at the border.
Last August, the Costa Rican government protested to that of Nicaragua about the presence in
the area of dispute of about a hundred members of the Sandinista Youth, a group sympathetic
to Daniel Ortega, and demanded their departure from the place.
However, the following day Ortega publicly supported these young people, which Costa Rica
called a mockery of the measures ordered by the ICJ.
440 Annex 98
University Seminar, “Environmental damage feared due to
construction of highway parallel to Rio San Juan”,
1 November 2011
441442 Annex 98
University Seminar, “Environmental damage feared due to construction of highway
parallel to Río San Juan” , Tuesday, 1 November 2011.
Environmental damage feared due to construction of highway parallel to
Río San Juan
Tuesday, 1 November 2011, 23:43
By Ernesto Ramírez ([email protected] )
University Seminar
Environmentalists and persons involved in natural resources protection fear that the highway
being constructed by the Government parallel to the Río San Juan will have a serious
environmental impact and that in the end the “medicine will be worse than the illness.”
The highway, planned by President Laura Chinchilla’s administration in the context of the
border conflict with Nicaragua, affects the area’s ecology and a large area characterized by
biodiversity considered “strategic” and of enormous importance by environmental advocates.
Development of the project is based on an emergency decree (36440) issued by Chinchilla
last 21 February and published in the official daily “La Gaceta” on 7 March.
This decree allows several Government entities, including the Transportation Ministry and the
National Highway Safety Council, to operate under exception, which allows them to override
permit procedures and other regulations.
Have profound environmental impact studies been done regarding the San Juan zone
highway? Is Costa Rica really facing an emergency when in March the Court in The Hague
issued precautionary measures and Nicaraguan troops abandoned territory of t he Caleros-Los
Portillos island long ago? How much awareness is there regarding the impact of this route in a
zone of enormous environmental importance such as the bi national basin of the San Juan?
This and another series of questions are of concern to se veral ecologists and environmental
advocates who do not hide their fear that the highway will cause serious damage to protected
systems in the zone and will, in the context of the conflict that broke out in October of last
year, in fact give Nicaragua armsagainst Costa Rica.
(See separate item: MINAET [Spanish acronym] vigilant against serious impact, said the
Deputy Minister.)
According to geologist, Allan Astorga, any project similar to the one promoted for the border
with Nicaragua involves environmenta l risks. He stated to UNIVERSIDAD that for this
reason “it should be developed and implemented under an effective environmentally minded
procedure in order to avoid damage.”
443Annex 98
Environmental lawyer and Costa Riva UNIVERSITY professor, Álvaro Sagot, also expressed
concern regarding the project since it is unknown if it is guided by the concepts of
environmental viability.
“It is very simple. The necessary Environmental Impact Studies are being passed over by way
of a decree. No one can say that there is or will not be any environmental impact regarding
biodiversity,” he commented.
Nicolás Boeglin, an international law expert recalled that the San Juan region has biological
corridors that are protected by law.
“From the ecological standpoint, this is a vulnerable zone. Certain precautionary measures
have to be taken in the construction of a highway,” he indicated.
The vice-president of the Environment Court, Yamileth Mata, admitted that she was even
unaware of the construction of the highway. She did not discard e ventual intervention by the
body regarding the viability of the project.
On the other hand, Uriel Juárez, Secretary General of the National Environmental Technical
Secretariat (SETENA, by its Spanish acronym), told UNIVERSITY that this body has not
been consulted, nor have its criteria on the highway and its possible risks been requested.
“There has been no request or inquiry regarding criteria here,” he indicated.
The director of the Tortuguero Conservation Area, Luis Rojas, said that that entity of the
SINAC (Spanish acronym) “participated in some instances of consultation” regarding about
30 kilometers under its jurisdiction. He commented to this weekly that “Every project
involves risks.”
Miguel Zamora, assistant director of the Arenal -Huetar Norte Conservation Area, reported
that this entity in carrying out an “routine investigation” to verify what is happening in his
area. “We have not been consulted on this project,” he assured.
Mauricio Álvarez, of the Environmental Booths of the University of Costa Rica, as well as
Gino Biamonte, director of the ecology group APREFLOFAS, also expressed his fear.
Separately they both stated, “The area is too sensitive and vulnerable.”
Legislator Claudio Mon ge of the Citizens Action Party (PAC, by its Spanish acronym)
warned, “We are investigating, I will not allow an environmental disaster.”
MINAET is watchful against serious impact
Environment, Energy and Telecommunications Vice Minister, Lorena Guevara, s aid that
entity is watchful in order that the environmental balance of the San Juan zone not be
affected. Below are parts of her answers to questions sent to her by e-mail.
444 Annex 98
How was MINAET involved in supervision of the project since it is located in protected
corridors?
The decree referred to responds to a “particular or sui generis” emergency, since it was issued
in the middle of the situation and process caused by the Nicaraguan violation of Costa Rica’s
sovereignty, particular in Calero island, and because of the environmental damage caused in
our homeland.
Due consideration should be given to the particular nature of the event that led to the decree
and the General Emergency Plan developed to address it. This was essentially a political
phenomenon with many effects and variants that are difficult to pinpoint. Under these
circumstances, the constitutional system provides special rules that allow the Executive
Branch to address emergency situations, so that action can be as prompt and decisive as the
circumstances merit thus minimizing the consequences of natural and other disasters.
Was the risk and environmental impact of this project evaluated?
In the present situation and given latent threat of further incursions from Nicaragua, Costa
Rica must design vigilance mechanisms and ensure permanent presence of its police forces in
the conflict zone at the southernmost part of the Colorado Delta, and t he border side of the
Río San Juan. Phase One of the General Emergency Plan includes concrete action by seven
institutions: the Ministry for Public Security, the Costa Rican Electrical Energy Institute, the
National Risk Prevention and Emergency Commission, the Costa Rican Red Cross, the Costa
Rican Social Security Fund, the Environment Energy and Telecommunications Ministry, and
the National Highway Commission. Activity of the CONAVI (Spanish acronym) includes the
construction of an artery parallel to the Río San Juan, and in the case of the MINAET -
National System for Reserve Arjeas, these entities have the role of constant environmental
monitoring and surveillance over national wildlife reserves in the region.
Which is the supervising entity? Why wasn’t the SETENA included? Who did the
environmental impact studies, if there were any?
In the case of the MINAET, the intention is to provide the SINAC with the necessary
conditions and resources for protection and surveillance. The MINAET -SINAC has been
careful that the projects cause as little environmental impact as possible, since the primary
purpose of the road parallel to the Río San Juan is to safeguard life and physical integrity,
property and the environment in the face of disasters and dangerous events t hat may occur.
The other entities have been accountable and have proceeded in compliance with the
regulations regarding an extraordinary situation provided by a decree of this nature. As a
member of the National Emergencies Commission, the MINAET has been informed of the
actions resulting from this emergency decree, and at a technical level the SINAC has been
responsible for the actions established in the General Emergency Plan. It should be mentioned
the route parallel to the Río San Juan was established a long the two kilometer wide northern
border strip where human activity has been evident for many years.
445446 Annex 99
El País, Costa Rica, “Chinchilla Defends Highway Criticized
by Nicaragua, Rejects Dialogue”,
(Source: EFE / 13 December 2011).
14 December 2011
447448 Annex 99
El País, Costa Rica “Chinchilla defends highway criticized by Nicaragua, rejects
dialogue”, Wednesday, 14 December 2011 (Source: EFE / 13 December 2011)
El País.cr
Wednesday, 14 December 2011 – Costa Rica
Chinchilla defends highway criticized byNicaragua, rejects dialogue
Source: EFE / 13 December 2011
San José, 13 Dec (EFE) – The president of Costa Rica, Laura Chinchilla, said today
that her country the right and the need to construct a highway on territory near the border with
Nicaragua. She r ejected dialogue with that nation which has criticized the project due to
alleged environmental damage.
Everything we are doing is according to the law. We issued and emergency decree due
to national necessity and it is on that basis that we have develope d the projects. We are not
taking even one step back,” express Chinchilla today in the press conference following the
weekly meeting with her cabinet.
The 120 kilometer highway is being constructed on Costa Rican territory. It connects
20 communities near the Río San Juan, under Nicaraguan sovereignty, which runs along the
border and was the only communication channel between the settlements.
“Our only action has been to bring development to a northern border population which
can now enjoy communication through Costa Rica territory,” said Chinchilla.
The president emphasized that the dwellers themselves donated land from cattle
ranches to facilitate construction of the highway. She ensured that the communities have also
benefitted from newly acquired elec trical service, running water and schools, as well as the
creation of some 7,000 jobs.
In recent weeks, the Nicaraguan Government has complained to Costa Rica for
supposed environmental damage to the Río San Juan provoked by the highway and has
demanded that the project be detained until environmental impact studies are revealed.
Nonetheless, Chinchilla reiterated that her country has the right to construct the project
with no explanation to Nicaragua and dismissed the idea of serious environmental damage .
She ensured that there is a mitigation plan as is the case with any “national project”.
“We have no reason to offer explanations to the Government of Nicaragua,” said the
president.
Chinchilla recalled that Nicaragua “has paid no mind” to the precautiona ry measures
mandated by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in a case regarding Nicaragua’s supposed
449Annex 99
invasion of a piece of Costa Rican territory near the Río San Juan where is supposedly caused
environmental damage to wetlands protected by international conventions.
“There will be no dialogue until Nicaragua complies with instructions issued by the
Court,” said Chinchilla.
The ICJ ordered both countries to abstain from deploying civilian, military or police
personal to the zone in controversy, but in recent months Costa Rica has denounced the
constant presence there of members of the “Sandinista youth.”
According to the Nicaraguan Government the Sandinista youth have gone there for
environmental protection tasks.
On 5 December Costa Rica presented the ICJ in The Hague, an aide memoire with
initial written allegations against Nicaragua regarding the territorial dispute.
450 Annex 100
El Nuevo Diario, Nicaragua, “Outrage everywhere over San Juan River
parallel highway, No Studies Done for Costa Rican Highway”
15 December 2011
451452 Annex 100
El Nuevo Diario, Nicaragua, “Outrage everywhere over San Juan River parallel
highway, No Studies Done for Costa Rican Highway”, 15 December 2011.
El Nuevo Diario
15 December 2011
Outrage everywhere over San Juan River parallel highway
No Studies Done for Costa Rican Highway
*Costa Rican Foreign Foreign Minister Confesses: “Emergency Decree” exempted Costa
Rica from environmental impact study on the project
José Adán Silva and Sixto Valladares
[National News Section]
A statement by the Nicaraguan Academy for Geography and History on the ecological
disaster caused by Costa Rica in the Río San Juan as a result of its construction of a highway
parallel to the waterway calls on the Government of Nicaragua and international
environmental protection organiza tions to sue the Government of San José for this action,
which according to the organization, is being carried out out of revenge and resentment, and
out of disregard for the Nicraguan and Central American ecosystem.
The statement by the prestigious cultural and scientific institution of the country points
out that the construction of this highway Laura Chinchilla’s government is reflecting
“disregard for world concern for the conservation of tropical rain forests, reflects unfortunate
resentment toward Nicaragua and discredits Costa Rica as a green country.”
The statement by the Academy consists of five points in which it denounces on the
world level and draws attention in Central America, regarding the damage to nature on the
istmus caused by the destru ctive Costa Rican projects at a time when the region is most
vulnerable in the face of the climate change due to environmental destruction.
An attack on Central America
According the statement, “The cross-border impact of this near fet acompli is an attack
against Central American natural patrimony. In this regard, Nicaragua should resort to the
International Court of Justice for precautionary measures directed to mitigating the ravages
caused to the present, and to suspension of the mentioned construction.”
This 120 kilometer highway does not contribute to the progress of the almost non-
existent Costa Rican Caribbean population, but rather alters the ecosystem created by the river
and its basin and prevents Costa Ricans’ practice of eco- tourism through their exercise of
their right to limited navigation along the mentioned stretch of the lower course of the Río
San Juan. In fact residue dumped into the river will destroy one of the few waterways of the
continent (by finishing off its fauna among other irre parable damage) and compromises the
453Annex 100
navigability of the Río Colorado, a tributary of the Río San Juan located on Costa Rican
territory,” added the Academy.
Developing this highway violates all bilateral, regional and international conventions
and treaties signed by the two countries for the promotion of responsibility for environmental
protection, and which prohibit dumping sediment and other pollutants into a neighboring
country.
Finally, Costa Rica has disregarded Nicaragua’s claim that a country canno t destroy
the environment of a neighboring country as this constitutes an unfriendly and irrational
attitude,” pointed out the Nicaraguan Academy for Geography and History.
“There are no environmental impact studies”
As if ratifying the “unfriendly and irrational attitude,” the Costa Rican Foreign
Minister himself, Enrique Castillo, confessed yesterday to the Costa Rican press that the
environmental demolition work was not the subject of environmental impact studies because
they were carried out in the context of an emergency decree that “exempted” them from these
requirements.
True to their incendiary and nationalist rhetoric, the Costa Rican Foreign Minister
reiterated that his country is not obligated to any kind of explanation, “nor to suspend its work
being carried out as a consequence of an emergency provoked by Nicaragua, because we are
being invaded by 500 Nicaraguan army soldiers disguised as ecology monitors that work
along the border.”
“Nicaragua has not presented an environmental impact asses sment on the Brito
project, on the construction of an airport that is already completed in the wetlands zone
protected by RAMSAR to the north of our border, or on its invasion of Isla Portillos (Harbour
Head), on its dredging which whereby residue has been dumped on Costa Rican territory,” he
expressed.
This is a sovereign project we are carrying out under a decree that exempts us from
environmental impact studies, that is why we owe no explanations,” confessed the official
thus revealing that behind these projects there is no study for mitigating environmental
damage in the zone. We still do not know who will represent Costa Rica in the SICA summit,
said Castillo.
And when will the lawsuit be presented?
According to former Nicaraguan foreign minister, Norman Caldera, the government of
president Daniel Ortega should request precautionary measures before the International Court
of Justice in order to stop environmental demolition while experts jointly request bilateral
dialogue to which has been adamantly opposed by Costa Rica.
The government should have acted long ago and requested precautionary measures to
detain these projects. It should have filed a lawsuit long ago. This is not a matter of issuing
454 Annex 100
Notes to an entity that is outright disinterested in dialogue. What is the matter with the
government that it has not acted?” Caldera asked.
Religious, environmental, indigenous and community, political, civil society and
business voices have joined this demand that Nicaragua act more firmly and decisively to stop
the environmental degradation. According to former diplomat Julio Icaza the main problem is
that “neither of the two presidents has the will or the political maturity”.
To each his role
Icaza is of the opinion that the conflict which begun last ye ar should have been
discussed bilaterally “for the good of both nations.”
However, since that time the high level officials from both countries have committed
countless errors “in that there has been no capacity for a serious dignified dialogue toward
imaginative solutions in the management of this rich and promising border area.”
Icaza said that each government is using the conflict over the Río San Juan for benefit
through so-called patriotic speeches and rousing nationalist sentiment. “He is absorbed i n the
accumulation of power and uses nationalism to obtain more of it; she seeks to use the conflict
to distract from her ineffectiveness and the lack of popularity her government has come to.
While they maintain these positions there will be no progress,” according to Icaza.
Insistence on dialogue
“This problem will be resolved there are mature government with vision, led by true
statesmen with a vision for the future and enough will to resolve the conflict and not for using
it for solving internal problems,” said Icaza.
Mario Herdocia, an international relations expert agrees, “The best instrument is
dialogue between Costa Rica and Nicaragua. There has a been a vacuum in the bilateral
relation in that these two neighbors and brothers must learn to solve their differences through
dialogue and negotiation.
According to Herdocia the dialogue is “the opportunity for Costa Rica to present the
environmental impact assessment and for Nicaragua to present its concerns so they may come
to an agreement.
Muscle and rhetoric
The former ambassador to Costa Rica, Mauricio Díaz indicated that even though “to
the present they have not come to the boiling point,” the tension has precluded the possibility
of a solving the conflict through bilateral dialogue.
“Ortega has been all rhetoric and Mrs. Laura’s reaction has been more muscle than
brains. She is endangering Costa Rican eco- democracy,” according to his observation while
alerting that regardless of the discourses behind the Costa Rican projects lie true social
455Annex 100
concerns for both riverbanks of the waterway, for the potential damage to the ecosystem as a
result of the project underway.
Not 120 kilometers but 160
Official information on the projects made public yesterday in San José by the
President of Costa Rica, indic ate that the highway in reality consists of 160 kilometers and
extends from the Costa Rica Delta to the village of Los Chiles. This includes reparation to 300
additional kilometers of accesses to the main highway in order to “connect” 2,500 families
living the area.
In Nicaragua the issue has generated total opposition from environmental groups that
are taking legal and court action to sue the Chinchilla government: they are doing studies,
they are on site filming, taking notes, gathering testimony and oth er carry out other activity
relevant to their competence.
The Ministry for the Environment updated information on the environmental
destruction for the Central American Integration System (SICA, by its Spanish acronym), the
UNESCO, the Central American Court and the United Nations System for the Environment.
(Matilde Córdova and María Adelia Sandoval collaborated with this article.)
456 Annex 101
El Nuevo Diario, Nicaragua, “Costa Rica affirms Central American
Court is politicized in favor of Nicaragua”. Source: EFE
7 January 2012
457458 Annex 101
Costa Rica affirms Central American Court ispoliticized in favor of Nicaragua
Source: EFE │ 7/1/2012
Costa Rican Foreign Minister Enrique Castillo reaffirmed that his country does not recognize the
Central American Court of Justice (CCJ) and denounced that this regional body “is politicized”
in favor of Nicaragua within the framework of a bilateral conflict concerning the construction of
a road on Costa Rican soil.
“The CCJ, to which Costa Rica is not a member and has never recognized or accepted its
jurisdiction and competence, once again tries to forcefully impose itself, claiming attributions it
does not have", said Castillo in a statement published today in the local press.
He added that the Court does this “to serve the interests of the Government of Nicaragua, which
opposes the construction of a ru ral road in Costa Rican territory, and to seek power and
legitimacy it lacks".
On December 19 last, the CCJ, seated in Managua, upheld a complaint filed by two Nicaraguan
environmental organizations ag ainst Costa Rica for the construction of a 120 km road on the
south bank of the boundary San Juan River in Costa Rican territory.
The Government of Nicaragua has affirmed that this road is causing environmental damage to
the San Juan R iver under Nicaraguan sovereignty, and therefore also filed a complaint with the
International Court of Justice (ICJ).
Costa Rica has stated that the gravel road is necessary to connect and bring development to some
twenty Costa Rican towns, where the only communication route was the San Juan River.
According to the Costa Rican Foreign Minister, “The CCJ is a politicized body and also
prejudiced against Costa Rica" and also pointed out that the president of that c ourt “has already
prejudged” by publicly referring to the sanc tions that the c ourt will impose and by calling his
country “the rebel Costa Rica”.
“A court like this attempts against the integrity of SICA (Central American Integration System)
and its laudable objectives", expressed Castillo.
The diplomat recalled that the Costa Rican Legislative Assembly never approved the Statute of
1995, which stipulated “the integration, functioning and attributions" of the Court.
Castillo added that his country did not approve the Statute because the attributions of the CCJ are
unconstitutional as it would become “a supranational power".
The CCJ, created by the Tegucigalpa Protocol in 1991, is composed of two ju stices from El
Salvador, Honduras and Nicaragua and their respective alternates , and it is foreseenthat two
459Annex 101
justices from Guatemala will soon be incorporated. Belize, Costa Rica and Panama have not yet
ratified the Statute of the Court.
This conflict is a new chapter in the tense relation between both countries since October 2010
when Costa Rica denounced a Nicaraguanmilitary and civilian incursion to its territory as part of
the San Juan River dredging works.
On that same year, the Costa Rican Government denounced Nicaragua before the International
Court of Justice in The Hague for invading its territory and causing se rious environmental
damage in the zone, especially in wetlands protected by international agreements.
460 Annex 102
El Nuevo Diario, Nicaragua, “Costa Rican Vice-President suggests
eating the San Juan”
23 January 2012
461462 Annex 102
23 January 2012
With tourism objectives for the debatable road
Costa Rican Vice-President suggests eating the San Juan
Sixto Valladares, National News Correspondent
San José, Costa Rica
Costa Rican Second Vice President Alfio Piva invited his compatriots to “eat the
Río San Juan,” while suggesting the inhabitants of communities on the border with
Nicaragua work with their government on a plan for tourism development of the river ,
including its surrounding land, and taking advantage of the mentioned path which runs
parallel to the Nicaraguan waterway.
“This border area is one of Costa Rica’s most beautiful, and you should now us e
to your advantage the inauguration of the road running parallel to the river. I invite Costa
Ricans to visit Tiricias and other areas so you can come and eat the Río San Juan,” said
Piva while flan ked by First Vice President Luis Liberman during the inauguration of a
project bringing electricity to that Nicaragua border area.
Piva, who called himself a seasoned environmenta list, immediately explained,
“When I say I will eat the San Juan, this is a metaphor because I believe the river is full
of a great variety of fish and shrimp.”
Nicaraguan presence
At 10:30am, before the ceremony had started, a Nicaraguan Government
helicopter was seen flying over the Río San Juan.
The unarmed white and light blue aircraft was flying at medium speed a short
distance from Costa Rican airspace, according toLa Nación daily newspaper published in
neighboring Nicaragua.
According to the same newspaper, minutes later while Liberman was speaking a
vessel with ten Nicaraguan military personnel seen in the river moved on without
stopping.
Seconds later, Liberman said that the government would not waiver in its
determination to put an end t o the border area path initiated months before the Harbour
Head conflict erupted.
Costa Rica’s First Vice President then warned that “no foreign government and no
Court that is not recognized by us can tell us what we can and cannot do.”
463Annex 102
Liberman was referring to the recent resolution of the Central American Court of
Justice (CCJ by its Spanish acronym) which orders the Laura Chinchilla Government to
stop construction of a road with stretches that are parallel to the Río San Juan, and which
has apparently caused ecological damage to the Nicaraguan river.
464 Annex 103
La Nacion, Costa Rica “Conavi Built a Dirt Road along the Border
without a Single Design Plan”
23 May 2012
465466 Annex 103
160 KM CONSTRUCTION WORK PARALLEL TO THE SAN JUAN RIVER LACKED
DESIGN
Conavi Built a Dirt Road along the Border without a Single Design Plan
Lack of design plans might have raised costs and cause accelerated deterioration of the road
Government did not anticipate drainage systems nor did it perform a topographic survey to
find the best layout
ESTEBAN OVIEDO [email protected] 12:00 A.M. 23/05/2012
Conavi built a 160- kilometer dirt road along the border with N icaragua, without a single
design plan to evidence the layout for opening the road or to determine the characteristics it
should have.
RELATED NOTES
Absence of design might end up in higher costs, environmental problems and fast
deterioration of the proj ect, stated Olman Vargas, Executive Director of the Federated
School of Engineers and Architects (CFIA).
The construction work lacked a topographic survey to define the route with the least
amount of obstacles. In addition, ditches, culverts or river cros sings not designed. Now, as
the National Roadway Council (Conavi for its acronym in Spanish) itself admitted, the dirt
road has many slopes with gradients greater than those due and curves not apt for proper
vehicle transit.
The inexistence of design plans confirmed to this news media by CFIA, Conavi and the
company, Compañía Asesora de Construcción e Ingenieria SA (Cacisa for its acronym in
Spanish). The latter hired in January of the current year to provide project supervision
support.
The dirt road construction began in December 2010, in the wake of the conflict that arose
with Nicaragua in October of that same year over the occupation Calero Island.
Conavi spent a bit over ¢20.000 million in the Project, which includes habilitation of 440
km in access roads.
Nine hundred (900) machines - Fourteen months after works began, when Cacisa joined
the work efforts, it found 900 machines working along the border without any design plans.
Roberto Cambronero, an engineer from Cacisa, described it like this: “ We arrived at a
cutting drawer, a cut on both sides (of the dirt road). Then we asked the person in charge,
how much before finishing? What are you doing? ‘Oh, I’m cutting’. Moreover, how much
467Annex 103
do you still have to do? He did not know because there were no design plans, and you can
perfectly well say, ‘leave it here’”.
José Manuel Sáenz, Cacisa partner, added that a design would allow for calculating the
width and the slope cut, which require topographic stakes placed.
To open the route, Conavi hired companies with trucks or excavators that charge on a per
hour basis.
According to Cambronero, the Head of Conavi should define the layout. This is an engineer
surnamed Serrano who is now suspended due to an investigation about supposed handouts
in the project.
Gerardo Prada, also a partner at Cacisa, said the machine operators received orders to open
the dirt road on the riverbank. Nonetheless, he and Saenz sustained that even so, it was
necessary to avoid topographic obstacles such as hills, wetlands or very steep plots of land.
For Saenz, the kilometers closest to the area in conflict properly made under the chosen
manner due to the urgency; but the rest deserved a basic plan: “We are in the XXI Century.
This requires a design, this road is like going from San Jose to Moin, and it is a very large
road. To think about making 150 kilometers with just machines, without design (…) I’m
referring to mere professional diligence… it is not done in this manner”.
The CFIA Director also expressed concern due to the lack of drainage: “A great deal of the
investment might end up lost with a few rainfalls.”
No One Responsible – Vargas confirmed that the School of Professionals decided that
Conavi did not report to them who was the professional responsible for the work and did
not deliver any design plans to them.
According to Vargas, the fact that work began under the umbrella of an emergency decree
(signed in March 2011) did not exempt Conavi from making those reports.
Jose Luis Salas, Executive Director of Conavi, s ustained that design plans were not
available due to an emergency. “There was no time”, he explained.
Salas sustained that Conavi and Cacisa make topographic surveys to review the geometric
design, improve slopes, curves and water contention systems. He denied that the absence of
design plans due to force majeure caused a rise in costs.
Marcela Cantero collaborated
468 Annex 104
La Nación, Costa Rica “Government avoided applying
environmental control in border trail”
24 May 2012
469470 Annex 104
Assessment of damage to the environment began a year after the start of construction
Government avoided applying environmental control in border trail
Minaet ( the Ministry of Environment , Energy and Telecommunications ) discarded
environmental Consulting for economic reasons
Environmental report reveals damage to wetlands, forests and rivers
Ernesto Rivera [email protected] 12:00 a.m. 24/05/2012
For a year the government avoided establishing environmental controls and had no plan to
mitigate the damage to nature caused by the construction of the Juan Mora Porras trail, on the
border with Nicaragua.
Between December 2010 and December 2011, the machinery advanced along 160 kilometers
of forests, grasslands, rivers and wetlands without assessing the impact on the environment, or
conducting a forest inventory, or appointing a team to exercise the environmental regency of
the project.
In November last year there was an initiative on the board of directors of the National
Emergency Commission (CNE) to hire a team of consultants and assess the damage caused by
the work and propose mitigation measures during construction.
However, the Deputy Minister of Environment, Ana Lorena Guevara, decided not to make
such contracts for e conomic reasons and to carry out the assessments and recommendations
using in-house professionals from her own ministry.
Under the protection of executive decree 36.440, issued on 7 March 2011 by President Laura
Chinchilla, the construction was exempted from needing prior approval of an environmental
impact study.
A year and a half after the work was started, a study by the Ministry of Environment reveals
that during the work wetlands were altered and primary forests were cut down in the area
between the Medio Queso River and Boca de San Carlos. Also, sediments were accumulated
in a wetland between the river mouth of Sarapiquí River and Caño La Tigra stream.
Deputy minister Guevara claimed that they began to think of assessing environmental damage
in October last year, when criticisms were spread from Nicaragua concerning the effects that
the construction of the border trail was creating on the environment.
“In November 2011 the road was already in its execution phase, there was no possibility to
prevent it; what could be done was to take mitigation and compensation measures because the
damage was already done”, Guevara admitted.
Economic reasons. In November last year the Ministry of Environment claimed economic
reasons for not hiring a team of biologists, forestry engineers, geographers, sociologists and
471Annex 104
lawyers who were to assess the impact of the project and propose measures to mitigate
environmental damage.
The then deputy minister of Environment, Andrei Bourrouet, was in charge of elaborating the
terms of reference for that contract.
“I was asked to elaborate the terms of reference for an interdisciplinary team that would
assess the environmental damage, I did, but a different person had the responsibility to make
this initiative happen”, said Bourrouet.
Deputy Minister Ana Lorena Guevara, who succeeded Bourrouet in the post, claimed that she
consulted the issue with the high level committee, c omposed of the deputy ministers of the
Presidency, Mauritius Boraschi, of Foreign Affairs, Carlos Roverssi as well as of Security,
Walter Navarro, and that the decision not to hire the consultants was taken collegially.
Deputy Minister Boraschi noted that each institution was responsible for its own specific area.
“Deputy minister Guevara told us that Minaet had the technical capacity to do the job and we
accepted that”.
Deputy minister Carlos Roverssi offered a similar account. “Minaet told us that they could
assess the environmental impact and develop a mitigation plan. Each institution is responsible
for its own area and the others acceptedwhat deputy minister Guevara proposed to us”.
472 Annex 105
Press release from CONAVI to the public
25 May 2012
473474 Annex 105
Press release from CONAVI to the public
Because of the serious questions posed by the media about the actions taken by the National
Roads Authority ( CONAVI) in relation to the construction of R oute 1856 and in order to
provide citizens with stronger evidence to enable it to form a comprehensive and objective
opinion of the circumstances in which the work has been developed, the National Roads
Authority clarifies:
1. The first thing that needs to be understood is that the works on R oute 1856 were done in a
context of national emergency and faced with a situation that clearly and obviously affected
the sovereignty and security of our country. Failing to recognize and understand that this was
the situation, would lead any person to make judgments of opinion based on an incomplete
assessment of the facts and circumstances.
2. The work on R oute 1856 was done under those circumstances. Therefore it must be
understood that some of the determining factors of the action taken were to act quickly but
within the framework of discretion, that is, motivated based on the best interests of the nation.
In fact, an Emergency Decree was issued in order to give context to the nature of the situation.
3. As the Costa Rican people will understand, in these circumstances i t could not be expected
that the works of the route be developed within the framework of standard procedures but
rather under the exceptions provided for in the Constitution and the laws of the Republic. In
this respect, it should be understood that the work of starting the trail could not be subjected
to the procedures for development of infrastructure projects that take into account, for
example, stages of conceptualization, feasibility, design and management of the work. But,
not having done that is not synonymous with acting without a proper and speedy analysis for
the decision that was made.
4. To say at this stage that there was a lack of blueprints or that it was not reported who the
professional responsible for the work was, are assessments that we believe are inappropriate
within the framework of the best interests of the nation, which have motivated our actions.
5. The route was built as a trail, nothing more or less, under the conditions indicated and that
is the way it is; in a development process in which all the work done on it improves it and will
increase the level of performance.
6. It is also necessary to clarify that in addition to the trail, whose length is currently estimated
at 160 kilometers, significant works were done on several acc ess roads to the trail itself. In
fact the total length of access roads that were worked on exceeds 332 kilometers. In other
words, the total work done covered over 492 kilometers of roads.
7. The above is very important because we have to understand then that the work associated
with Route 1856 must be appraised in a comprehensive way, at a regional level and not as a
single communication route. The impact of this set of actions is causing a real transformation
of the entire border region of our country, bringing development and hope to the Costa Ricans
in that area.
475Annex 105
8. Unfortunately the events early this month concerning the management and administration
of the work have come to overshadow the positive aspects of the work performed. About this,
CONAVI wishes to reiterate that the necessary actions will be taken in order to punish those
who should be punished . We respectfully await the processes of the Public Ministry and of
our Internal Audit to proceed accordingly.
9. Media coverage should not be the only source of information , but each complex element of
what has been presented must be judged. Allow us to say that we at CONAVI are the first to
feel committed to care for the the best interests of the nation, but demanding responsibility
and punishing those who deserve it.
10. We would like to take this opportunity to inform the Costa Rican people that both MOPT
(Ministry of Public Works and Transport ) and CONAVI are working to safeguard the route .
We would also like to say that we are preparing a work plan for the continuation of the works
and we assure you that those works will be done using the prescribed procedures and with
levels of control to avoid the mistakes made during the first phase of the project.
11. There is work to do: we need to finish the ballasting, place drainage systems and sewers,
we have to put up bridges, some of them very expensive. However, in a gradual way we will
be improving the road so that it can be used properly to benefit the people in the area, and in
general, for development of the country.
We end this note by stating that despite the vicissitudes thatoccurred and the difficulties we
encounter in our quest to do things right, we at CONAVI will continue to meet our
responsibilities while at the same time properly informing the Costa Rican people, not only
about Route 1856, but about the large number of projects and work we do on the National
Road Network.
25 May 2012
476 Annex 106
El Pais, Costa Rica, “Faced with Criticism, Conavi Confirms to Have
Done Work on 332 Kilometers of Roads around Route 1856”
26 May 2012
477478 Annex 106
Faced with criticism, Conavi confirms to have done work on 332 kilometers of roads
around Route 1856
Source: Carlos Salazar Fernández | 2012-05-26. El Pais.cr
Section of Route 1856 near Delta Costa Rica. Photo by Carlos Salazar.
San José, 26 M ay (elpais.cr) – Given the wave of criticism for corruption, lack of
environmental studies and plans, among others, to build the trail known as Route 1856, the
National Roads Authority (Conavi) defended all actions taken and says to have done work on
332 kilometers of road, in addition to the 160 of the new road.
In a statement, published on the Presidential webpage, Conavi maintains that these works
were done in a context of national emergency, "and faced with a situation that clearly and
obviously affected the sovereignty and security of our country”.
“Failing to recognize and understand that this was the situation, would lead any person to
make judgments of opinion based on an incomplete assessment of the facts and
circumstances”, says the bulletin.
Conavi argues that with those conditions it was necessary to act quickly, "but within the
framework of discretion, that is, motivated based on the best interests of the nation. In fact, an
Emergency Decree was issued in order to give context to the nature of the situation”.
479Annex 106
After insisting on legality, Conavi added that for this reason it should be understood that the
work of starting the trail could not be subjected to the procedures for development of
infrastructure projects that tak e into account , for example, stages of conceptualization,
feasibility, design and management of the work.
“But, not having done that is not synonymous with acting without a proper and speedy
analysis for the decision that was made”, it is added.
“The route was built as a trail, nothing more or less, under the conditions indicated and that is
the way it is; in a development process in which a ll the work done on it improves it and will
increase the level of performance”, it is explained.
It is stressed that it is necessary to clarify that in addition to the trail, whose length is currently
estimated at 160 kilometers, significant works were done on several access roads to the trail
itself. In fact the total length of access roads that were worked on exceeds 332 kilometers.
Conavi went on to say that "the above is very important because we have to understand then
that the work associated with Route 1856 must be appraised in a comprehensive way, at a
regional level and not as a single communication route”.
On allegations of corruption, the Conavi bulletin says that the necessary action s will be taken
in order to punish those who should be punished. "We respectfully await the processes of the
Public Ministry and of our Internal Audit to proceed accordingly”, thus is stated.
After promising that the mistakes made will not be repeated, the government promises that the
work will continue and that it will be done using the prescribed procedures and with control
levels.
“There is work to do: we need to finish the ballasting , place drainage systems and sewers, we
have to put up bridges, some of them very expensive. However, in a gradual way we will be
improving the road so that it can be used properly to benefit the people in the area , and in
general, for development of the country”, thus finishes the statement.
480 Annex 107
La Nacion, Costa Rica “Serious errors expose trail to risk of
collapse during the rainy season”
28 May 2012
481482 Annex 107
UCR laboratory inspected Juan Mora Porras route
Serious errors expose trail to risk of collapse during the rainy season
Investments could be lost due to lack of drainage and poorly designed landfills
Lanamme: poor quality of work does not reflect the investment of ¢20,000 million
Ernesto Rivera, Esteban Oviedo and Ronny Rojas [email protected] 12:00 a.m.
28/05/2012
Much of the ¢20,000 million that the country has invested in building the trail bordering with
Nicaragua, could be lost during the next rainy season.
That is the warning given by engineers of the National Laboratory of Materials and Structural
Models (Lanamme) of the University of Costa Rica, after inspecting, at the beginning of this
month, 97 of the 160 kilometers of this road.
In their report, the experts say that the lack of adequate drainage and the instability of the cut
and fills that were performed on route 1856 could become a headache with the arrival of the
rains.
“In its present condition, t he border trail presents a high risk of collapse during the rainy
season”, is one of the conclusions of the study.
According to the Lanamme report, the consequences of this possible collapse would result in
“a substantial loss of the investments made so far”.
During the tour, carried out between Delta Costa Rica and the Pocosol River, the Lanamme
mission determined that the steep slopes and the irregular layout of the road were made based
on the experience of the machine operators, without taking into acc ount geotechnical or
topographical information.
Government authorities have refused to comment on the implications of the study since they
claim that they do not know about it yet.
Expensive transports. The goal for Lanamme was to technically assess the configuration,
quality and functionality of the works carried out on the trail border.
Another of their findings was the use of unsuitable materials to stabilize the road surfaceand
their transport from far away.
The inspectors found that in some locations large river rocks had been placed as a surface
layer.
In other places, very sandy materials had been used that are easily displaced by traffic, wind
or water.
483Annex 107
“Most of the time, these river materials were hauled from far away and they represent a
significant cost. In any case, it is inadmissible to use materials with undesirable
characteristics”, says the report in its conclusions.
The Government announced the construction of the trail as an alternative to using the San
Juan River for the transit of people and goods at the border with Nicaragua.
Its construction was carried out under the protection of emergency decree number 36.440,
signed by President Laura Chinchilla, which permitted the availability of lots of funds and the
avoidance of the controls of environmental legislation.
The Lanamme report advises that, despite the state of emergency, the design problems could
have been solved in a short time, using georeferencing techniques and software to guide the
engineering of the work.
They used containers. One of the threats that the border trail is currently facing is the lack of
adequate drainage to channel the flow of rain that will fall during the coming months.
The engineers found out that during the construction of the route containers were placed (the
kind that is used to transport goods) as structures for water drainage.
Due to falling materials, these containers are already deformed and at risk of collapse, as is
evidenced by the photographs included in the report.
“As long as it is not clear what the implications of the study are, or what the validity is of the
statements made in it, it would be irresponsible to make any comment”, the minister of
Communication, Francisco Chacón, said yesterday to La Nación.
Meanwhile, Luis Salas, executive director of the National Roads Authority (Conavi), pointed
out that he would like to read the document before expressing an opinion.
“The objective was to grow to, not to build immediately , a road as we all may have wanted.
Of course the geometric design was not carried out, because it is a trail”, Salas asserted.
484 Annex 108
Crhoy.com, “EngineersAssociation: ‘Emergency Decree does not
justify absence of engineering principles’”, available at
http://www.crhoy.com/colegio-de-ingenieros-decreto-de-emergencia-
no-justifica-ausencia-de-principios-de-ingenieria/
30 May 2012
485486 Annex 108
Engineers Association : “ Emergency Decree does not justif y absence of engineering
principles”
30 May 2012
12:13 am
Engineers Association assures that the government should acknowledge mistakes made on the
trail and find a solution. CRH
The Executive Director of the Costa Rican Association of Engineers and Architects (CFIA),
Olman Vargas, stated that in the construction of the border trail the basic principle of
engineering was broken and that there is no excuse that can justify the construction of the
road without any previous study or construction plan.
Thus he responded to statements that were given yesterday at a press conference by the
Deputy Foreign Minister Carlos Roverssi, the Minister of Transport Luis Llack, the Minister
of Environment René Castro, the Minister of Communication Francisco Chacon and the
Minister of Security Mario Zamora. The ministers said that the emergency decree justified the
manner in which the work on the border trail had been started and that the road was only a
transit route that did not require the technical details of a more urban street.
“We do not share the views of some representatives of the central government; to perform
work without following the proper steps of engineering can not be justified by urgency. I do
not know how it is in other fields of endeavor, but at least in engineering everything should be
adequately designed and planned. There are basic previous studies that need to be carried out
even if it is a trail”, said Vargas.
According to Vargas, there is a process that is logical, natural and inherent to engineering
which is to establish a whole series of previous and basic studies to determine the topography
and based on that to make a design that allows for solving any technical problems that ar e
found along the way. Following that, the construction work is carried out, but to say “that due
to the corresponding emergency (and which in this case we do not understand either; what
was it?) that whole process had to be skipped, does not seem logical”, Vargas pointed out.
487Annex 108
View of part of the border trail. The CFIA says that the emergency decree can not justify the
mistakes made in the work. CRH
The President of the CFIA commented that it could be understood that the reason for creating
an emergency decree was to use the emergency funds, which were important and could be
used in the development of the project, “but that does not justify that things have not been
done the way they should be done i n terms of engineering. That's like saying that because a
house is of social interest we will build it the wrong way and using bad materials, and it does
not matter if it falls down because it is not a house that is going to be built with technical
standards”.
According to the director of the CFIA, one should always work with the technical regulations
that apply, especially when there are few resources and there is the need to optimize them, as
is the case with the public resources used for route 1856; “that requires that things are done in
the best way possible”.
Despite the justifications given by the Government regarding the construction of the trail,
Vargas considers that just building about 160 km in the conditions and geography of a country
like Costa Rica is a substantial construction, even if it is located in a rural area.
“We are going to suggest to the Government, as has been done on other occasions, what
should be done from now on to protect the investments that were made, and especially to
redirect the investments in a way that allows the project to be brought into the appropriate
conditions, particularly from a technical point of view. That should be the G overnment's
position and they should say that they acknowledge everything that is wrong and will seek for
what can be done to protect the investments and we will correct everything that has to be done
from now on. It would not seem prudent or appropriate to try to defend what has not been
done right”, concluded Vargas.
488 Annex 109
Diario Extra, “Government acknowledges mistakes in
the construction of the trail”, available at
http://www.diarioextra.com/2012/mayo/30/nacionales13.php
30 May 2012
489490 Annex 109
GOVERNMENT ACKNOWLEDGES MISTAKES IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF
THE TRAIL
MIREN MARTÍNEZ / KRISSIA MORRIS
After weeks of silence, government officials came
forward to meet the information disclosed in the media
about route 1856, popularly known as the border trail.
They acknowledge d errors such as the lack of
blueprints and environmental impact studies for the
construction of it. They justified that the latter was due
to the urgent need to have a road in that area as
quickly as possible.
According to the Minister of Communication
Francisco Chacon, it is justified,in view of the route 1856, Juan Mora Porras,
under construction.
emergency decree issued in February of last year for
the construction of the border trail, that not all the requirements had been fulfilled, such as
those blueprints.
Meanwhile, Deputy Foreign Minister Carlos Roverssi stated that there is no environmental
impact which damages the San Juan River , as the presence of significant sedimentation has
not been detected.
On this matter he further argued that there is no evidence proving irreversible damage and that
the work will continue with mitigation plans.
Fishman demands accountability
Luis Fishman, faction leader of the Social Christian Unity Party PUSC, misses no chance to
clear up any lingering doubts. Taking advantage of the audience with Finance Minister Edgar
Ayales that took place yesterday at the meeting of the Ordinary Standing Committee for
Financial Affairs, in relation to the presentation of a fiscal strategy, Fishman took the
opportunity to hand over a letter demanding information about the 32 companies that have
participated in the border trail and that have been paid ¢17,550 million.
“We want to know the tax status of these companies, if they are properly registered, if they
have paid taxes and all information concerning the case”, declared Fishman.
491492 Annex 110
La Nación, Costa Rica, “Chinchilla: There may be errors,
but road project should continue”
31 May 2012
493494 Annex 110
President agrees all facts regarding construction should be made public
Chinchilla: There may be errors, but road projectshould continue
She is open to recognizing and correctinglapses if they were present
Insists above all project should proceed to avoid damage by rains
Carlos A. Villalobos [email protected] , 12:00am, 31 May 2012
Geneva, Switzerland. President Laura Chinchilla agreed yesterday that all details regarding the
construction of the border road should be revealed and that, if committed, errors should also be recognized.
However, she insisted that work on the project should continue.
This was her response after Carlos Roverssi, Vice Minister for Foreign Affairs, on Tuesday described as
a smear campaign information disseminated by the press regarding the lack of delineations plans and
environmental guarantees in construction of the route parallel to the Río San Juan.
According to a statement by Chinchilla during her last day on a trip to Eur ope, “Our intention is that
everything be clarified and made public, to eliminate doubts regarding the plans and intentions behind the
trocha construction, and that if errors have to be admitted, or procedures adjusted, this be done.”
She immediately made clear that despite what has happened her Government will assign more resources
to the project in order that be completed, “We cannot allow this project to go to waste, the work need not
stop.” She also insisted that this will not be a four-lane highway.
“This project began with the opening of the trocha, that is why the project has come to be called “La
Trocha” (“The Road”). I would like to remind Costa Rica that this is precisely how the road to Limón was
initiated, by opening a road,” she affirmed.
What should follow now is the stabilization of the road in order to prevent the winter from rendering a
waste the 22 million colones invested in the 160 kilometres of road and some 400 kilometres of nearby
routes.
The President said that more sophisticat ed projects are on the way such as “bridges with specific
delineation plans,” and that their total cost will be determined in the next few days.
A recent report by the National Laboratory on Structural Materials and Models of the University of
Costa Rica (Lanamme) warned that the monies invested in the La T rocha could go to waste due to
construction errors such as the lack of adequate draining, and instability due to inadequate land removal.
At the beginning of May Chinchilla ordered Francisco Jiménez, t hen Minister of Public Works, to
criminally process two officials of the National Highways Council (CONAVI by its Spanish acronym) for
receiving bribes from companies on contract with the project.
495Annex 110
The president also demanded Jiménez ’s resignation and the removal of former CONAVI executive
director Carlos Acosta Monge.
Instructions on resources. In a 1 September 2011 meeting of the Highways Co uncil Board of Directors,
Acosta stated that Chinchilla had requested that he “assign resources for continuation of work on the
Calero routes.” The search for more resources was discussed during the meeting.
Yesterday, in responded to questions on the matter the President responded “I cannot refer to what may
have happened in CONAVI in the past. I can say that in general my message in meetings with officials and
in public statements was always that we intended to seek and obtain the necessary financing in order to
consolidate the project during our government.”
The day before yesterday, La Nación also revealed that between December 2010 and March 2011 the
CONAVI secretly spent about 6 million colones , after the October 2010 Nicaraguan invasion of Calero
Island on the Caribbean side of the border.
At that time , the institution rented equipme nt with no prior public bidding although the Emergency
Presidential Decree mandating the project was published later on 7 March 2011. The President expressed
her preference that information on the matter be offered in writing.
496 Annex 111
Crhoy.com, “Path construction supervisors informed problems and
the lack of oversight”,available at http://www.crhoy.com/supervisores-
de-trocha-senalaron-problemas-e-inexistencia-de-controles/
11 June 2012
497498 Annex 111
Path construction supervisors informed problems and the lack of oversight
11 June 2012
12:28 am
Path construction supervisors informed defects and the lack of oversight. CRH
Since last January t he Construction and Engineering Consulting Company (CASIS A by its Spanish
acronym), responsible for the oversight of work on Route 1856, has been requesting labor, machinery and
outside contracts records from the National Highways Council (CONAVI by its Spanish acronym), as well as
inventories of supplies. According to a stateme nt by José Manuel Sáenz, an engineer with that company, to
crhoy.com, these documents have not been made available.
CASISA has sought them in order to verify justification for CONAVI disbursements and its order s for the
operation of more than 900 pieces of equipment used in route 1856.
“If that oversight existed, we were nevergiven access to it. We requestedthe information from one of those
in charge on behalf of the CONAVI ( an engineer by the name of Serr ano) but it was never made avai lable so
we proceeded to gather it on our own,” said Sáenz as he assured that the information was sought from the
moment CACISA began to supervise the project in January 2012. “We do not know what the functioning was
before we became involved, the CONAVI should have that information, but we never had access to it.”
However, the director of CONAVI, José Luis Salas, assured that these oversight mechanisms did exist.
“There was a procedure and when CACISA became involved they integrated into that procedure. The engineer
in charge (Serrano) presented the invoices and the information, and wrote a report. Then CONAVI followed the
protocol for disbursements for payment because justification for the payments was documented, the protocol
was in place and it continued to be observed before and after CACISA became involved,” according to Salas.
He commented that even if records cannot be referred to in the strict sense, the information always existed.
“To the extent that I have been able to corroborate, there was always information to back up those decisions.”
499Annex 111
Luis Llach, the Minister for Public Works and Transportation said, “I do not know how to answer that
question, I don’t know if records were kept or if there was documentation of the projects, or if it is require d by
entities involved in the investigation. I would not be able to tell you what happened with that information.”
When asked who was responsible for this type of control he said he did not know and that “these questions
are very difficult to answer. In t his case those responsible for the project could answer and I do no know who
they are. What I can say is that ultimate responsibility was with CONAVI.”
Notes:
Sáenz commented that when his company became involved as the oversight entity, besides requestin g the
documentation, they pointed out a series of “things that were missing and that this was counterproductive to the
progress of the project.”
More than 900 pieces of equipment and 35 companies worked on the construction of the path . This,
together with what was pointed out by Sáenz and the opinion of Ricardo Castro, the ex -president of the
Chamber for Construction, points to a grave error that must now be corrected if the funds are available…
500
Volume III - Annexes 27-111