Links

Site search
Document search
Contact

The Court

History
Members of the Court
Presidency
Chambers and Committees
Judges ad hoc
How the Court Works
Financial Assistance to Parties
Annual Reports

The Registry

Registrar
Organizational Chart of the Registry
Texts governing the Registry
Library of the Court
Employment
Judicial Fellowship Programme
Internships
Procurement

Cases

List of All Cases
Judgments, Advisory Opinions and Orders

Basic Documents

Charter of the United Nations
Statute of the Court
Rules of Court
Practice Directions
Other Texts

Jurisdiction

Contentious Jurisdiction
Advisory Jurisdiction

Press Room

Press releases
Calendar
Media Services
Multimedia
Frequently Asked Questions

Practical Information

Directions
Visits
Official holidays
Basic Toolkit
Links
Frequently Asked Questions

Publications

Introduction

Permanent Court of International Justice

Series A: Collection of Judgments (1923-1930)
Series B: Collection of Advisory Opinions (1923-1930)
Series A/B: Collection of Judgments, Orders and Advisory Opinions (from 1931)
Series C: Acts and documents relating to Judgments and Advisory Opinions given by the Court / Pleadings, Oral Arguments and Documents
Series D: Acts and Documents concerning the organization of the Court
Series E: Annual Reports
Series F: General Indexes
Other documents


Français

Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan: New Zealand intervening)

Overview of the case

On 31 May 2010, Australia instituted proceedings against Japan in respect of “Japan’s continued pursuit of a large‑scale program of whaling under the Second Phase of its Japanese Whale Research Program under Special Permit in the Antarctic (‘JARPA II’), in breach of obligations assumed by Japan under the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling (‘ICRW’), as well as its other international obligations for the preservation of marine mammals and the marine environment”.

As basis for the jurisdiction of the Court, Australia invoked the provisions of Article 36, paragraph 2, of the Court’s Statute, referring to the declarations recognizing the Court’s jurisdiction as compulsory made by Australia and Japan on 22 March 2002 and 9 July 2007, respectively.

On 20 November 2012, New Zealand filed in the Registry a declaration of intervention in the case. Relying on Article 63, paragraph 2, of the Statute, it contended that, as a party to the ICRW, it had a direct interest in the construction that might be placed upon the Convention by the Court in its decision in the proceedings.

In an Order of 13 February 2013, having noted that New Zealand met the requirements set out in the Statute and the Rules of Court, the Court found that the declaration of intervention was admissible. Public hearings were held from 26 June to 16 July 2013, during which oral arguments were presented by Australia and Japan, and the experts that each Party had asked to be called were heard by the Court. New Zealand presented oral observations on the subject‑matter of its intervention.

In its Judgment rendered on 31 March 2014, the Court first found that it had jurisdiction to entertain the case, rejecting Japan’s argument that the dispute fell within the scope of a reservation contained in Australia’s declaration recognizing the Court’s jurisdiction as compulsory. It then turned to the question of the interpretation and application of Article VIII of the 1946 Convention, paragraph 1 of which states that the parties “may grant to any of [their] nationals a special permit authorizing that national to kill, take and treat whales for purposes of scientific research”.

With respect to the interpretation of this provision, the Court noted that even if a whaling programme involves scientific research, the killing, taking and treating of whales pursuant to such a programme does not fall within Article VIII unless these activities are “for purposes of” scientific research. To determine this point and, in particular, to ascertain whether a programme’s use of lethal methods is for purposes of scientific research, the Court considered whether the elements of a programme’s design and implementation were reasonable in relation to its stated scientific objectives.

Regarding the application of Article VIII, paragraph 1, the Court noted that JARPA II could broadly be characterized as “scientific research”. However, it considered that the evidence before it did not establish that the programme’s design and implementation were reasonable in relation to achieving its stated objectives. The Court concluded that the special permits granted by Japan for the killing, taking and treating of whales in connection with JARPA II were not “for purposes of scientific research”, pursuant to Article VIII, paragraph 1, of the 1946 Convention.

The Court then turned to the implications of that conclusion, in light of Australia’s contention that Japan had breached several provisions of the Schedule annexed to the Convention. Having found that Japan had indeed breached some of the provisions invoked (namely the moratoriums on commercial whaling and factory ships, and the prohibition on commercial whaling in the Southern Ocean Sanctuary), it considered the question of remedies. Since JARPA II was an ongoing programme, it ordered Japan to revoke any extant authorization, permit or licence to kill, or take or treat whales in relation to it, and to refrain from granting any further permits under Article VIII, paragraph 1, of the Convention, in pursuance of that programme.


This overview is provided for information only and in no way involves the responsibility of the Court.

Institution of proceedings

Written proceedings

Declaration of Intervention by New Zealand

20 November 2012
Procedure(s): Intervention
Available in:
English French

Written Observations of New Zealand

4 April 2013
Procedure(s): Intervention
Available in:
English French

Oral proceedings

Verbatim record 2013/7

Public sitting held on Wednesday 26 June 2013, at 10 a.m., at the Peace Palace, President Tomka presiding, in the case concerning Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan: New Zealand intervening)
Available in:
Original Language
Translation
(bilingual version) Translation

Verbatim record 2013/8

Public sitting held on Wednesday 26 June 2013, at 3 p.m., at the Peace Palace, President Tomka presiding, in the case concerning Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan: New Zealand intervening)
Available in:
Original Language
Translation
(bilingual version) Translation

Verbatim record 2013/9

Public sitting held on Thursday 27 June 2013, at 10 a.m., at the Peace Palace, President Tomka presiding, in the case concerning Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan: New Zealand intervening)
Available in:
Original Language
Translation
(bilingual version) Translation

Verbatim record 2013/10

Public sitting held on Thursday 27 June 2013, at 3 p.m., at the Peace Palace, President Tomka presiding, in the case concerning Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan: New Zealand intervening)
Available in:
Original Language
Translation
(bilingual version) Translation

Verbatim record 2013/11

Public sitting held on Friday 28 June 2013, at 10 a.m., at the Peace Palace, President Tomka presiding, in the case concerning Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan: New Zealand intervening)
Available in:
Original Language
Translation
(bilingual version) Translation

Verbatim record 2013/12

Public sitting held on Tuesday 2 July 2013, at 3 p.m., at the Peace Palace, President Tomka presiding, in the case concerning Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan: New Zealand intervening)
Available in:
Original Language
Translation
(bilingual version) Translation

Verbatim record 2013/13

Public sitting held on Wednesday 3 July 2013, at 10 a.m., at the Peace Palace, President Tomka presiding, in the case concerning Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan: New Zealand intervening)
Available in:
Original Language
Translation
(bilingual version) Translation

Verbatim record 2013/14

Public sitting held on Wednesday 3 July 2013, at 3 p.m., at the Peace Palace, President Tomka presiding, in the case concerning Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan: New Zealand intervening)
Available in:
Original Language
Translation
(bilingual version) Translation

Verbatim record 2013/15

Public sitting held on Thursday 4 July 2013, at 10 a.m., at the Peace Palace, President Tomka presiding, in the case concerning Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan: New Zealand intervening)
Available in:
Original Language
Translation
(bilingual version) Translation

Verbatim record 2013/16

Public sitting held on Thursday 4 July 2013, at 3 p.m., at the Peace Palace, President Tomka presiding, in the case concerning Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan: New Zealand intervening)
Available in:
Original Language
Translation
(bilingual version) Translation

Verbatim record 2013/17

Public sitting held on Monday 8 July 2013, at 10 a.m., at the Peace Palace, President Tomka presiding, in the case concerning Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan: New Zealand intervening)
Available in:
Original Language
Translation
(bilingual version) Translation

Verbatim record 2013/18

Public sitting held on Tuesday 9 July 2013, at 4.30 p.m., at the Peace Palace, President Tomka presiding, in the case concerning Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan: New Zealand intervening)
Available in:
Original Language
Translation
(bilingual version) Translation

Verbatim record 2013/19

Public sitting held on Wednesday 10 July 2013, at 10 a.m., at the Peace Palace, President Tomka presiding, in the case concerning Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan: New Zealand intervening)
Available in:
Original Language
Translation
(bilingual version) Translation

Verbatim record 2013/20

Public sitting held on Wednesday 10 July 2013, at 3 p.m., at the Peace Palace, President Tomka presiding, in the case concerning Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan: New Zealand intervening)
Available in:
Original Language
Translation
(bilingual version) Translation

Verbatim record 2013/21

Public sitting held on Monday 15 July 2013, at 10 a.m., at the Peace Palace, President Tomka presiding, in the case concerning Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan: New Zealand intervening)
Available in:
Original Language
Translation
(bilingual version) Translation

Verbatim record 2013/22

Public sitting held on Monday 15 July 2013, at 3 p.m., at the Peace Palace, President Tomka presiding, in the case concerning Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan: New Zealand intervening)
Available in:
Original Language
Translation
(bilingual version) Translation

Verbatim record 2013/23

Public sitting held on Tuesday 16 July 2013, at 10 a.m., at the Peace Palace, President Tomka presiding, in the case concerning Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan: New Zealand intervening)
Available in:
Original Language
Translation
(bilingual version) Translation

Other documents

Orders

Order of 13 July 2010

Fixing of time-limits for the filing of the initial pleadings
Available in:
English French Bilingual

Judgments

Summaries of Judgments and Orders

Summary 2014/3

Summary of the Judgment of 31 March 2014
Available in:
English French

Press releases

Press release 2010/16

1 June 2010
Australia institutes proceedings against Japan for alleged breach of international obligations concerning whaling
Available in:
English French

Press release 2010/23

20 July 2010
Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan) - Fixing of time-limits for the filing of the initial pleadings
Available in:
English French

Press release 2012/18

18 May 2012
Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan) - Closure of written proceedings
Available in:
English French

Press release 2012/34

22 November 2012
Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan) - New Zealand files a declaration of intervention in the proceedings under Article 63 of the Statute
Available in:
English French

Press release 2013/2

13 February 2013
Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan) - The Court authorizes New Zealand to intervene in the proceedings
Available in:
English French

Press release 2013/7

11 April 2013
Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan : New Zealand intervening ) - The Court to hold public hearings from Wednesday 26 June to Tuesday 16 July 2013
Available in:
English French

Press release 2013/14

12 June 2013
Public hearings in the case concerning Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan: New Zealand intervening) - Public admission and media accreditation - Live and on-demand webcasts
Available in:
English French

Press release 2013/16

17 July 2013
Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan: New Zealand intervening) - Conclusion of the public hearings - Court to begin its deliberation
Available in:
English French

Press release 2014/13

4 March 2014
Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan: New Zealand intervening) - The Court to deliver its Judgment on Monday 31 March 2014 at 10 a.m.
Available in:
English French

Press release 2014/14

31 March 2014
Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan: New Zealand intervening) - The Court finds that Japan's whaling programme in the Antarctic (JARPA II) is not in accordance with three provisions of the Schedule to the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling
Available in:
English French

© International Court of Justice 2017-2021 – All rights reserved.